DOCSLIB.ORG

Hu Eth Manita Hiopia Arian R Respon Nse Fu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hu Eth Manita Hiopia Arian R Respon Nse Fu Humanitarian Response Fund Ethiopia Annual Report 2014 Office for Coorddination of Humanitarian Affairs 1 | P age CONTENTS NOTE FROM THE HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR ................................................................ 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 7 HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT ........................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................ 12 INFORMATION ON CONTRIBUTORS ................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................ 15 ALLOCATION OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................... 15 2.1 Allocation Strategy ......................................................................................................... 15 2.2 Allocation Breakdown .................................................................................................... 18 2.2.1 Allocation by Agency Type ...................................................................................... 18 2.2.2 Allocation by Location ............................................................................................. 18 2.2.3 Allocation by Sector ................................................................................................ 19 2.2.4 Acceptance versus Rejection Rate ......................................................................... 19 2.3 Fund Performance ......................................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER 3 ............................................................................................................................... 22 ALLOCATION RESULTS ........................................................................................................ 22 Nutrition ................................................................................................................................... 22 WASH ...................................................................................................................................... 26 Health ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Agriculture ............................................................................................................................... 30 Protection (Refugee Response) .............................................................................................. 33 Non-Food Items and Emergency Shelter ................................................................................ 36 Common Services ................................................................................................................... 37 CHAPTER 4 ................................................................................................................................ 40 ACCOUNTABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT..................................................................... 40 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND WAY FORWARD ............................................................... 43 CONCLUSIONS AND WAY FORWARD .................................................................................... 43 GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................ 44 ANNEXES: .................................................................................................................................. 46 2 | Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Government of Ethiopia Review Board The Office for the Coordination of OCHA extends its appreciation to Review Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) commends Board members who, through their the Government of Ethiopia (GoE) for dedicated participation in proposal review promoting a collaborative environment that meetings, ensured a timely and needs-based enables all humanitarian partners to supports response to emergencies throughout its efforts to provide emergency assistance Ethiopia. The collective effort of Review to disaster-affected populations and to build Board members, who include Cluster Leads national capacity for disaster prevention, (UN Agencies) and representatives from mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery Humanitarian International Non- and rehabilitation. The Disaster Risk Governmental Organizations (HINGOs1), Management (DRM) – Strategic Programme the Red Cross Movement, the Consortium of and Investment Framework (DRM-SPIF), a Christian Relief and Development tool developed to facilitate an effective Association (CCRDA) and the Ethiopian implementation of the National DRM Government is essential to making the Fund policy, was launched in 2014. A DRM-SPIF transparent and accountable to all Steering Committee and Taskforces have stakeholders. been established to support the Government This year, the Board met 24 times to review in operationalizing the DRM policy and and provide funding recommendations to 38 DRM-SPIF including development of applications. The Board also reviewed and guidelines and operational documents. A supported no-cost extensions and comprehensive risk assessment data for the reprogramming requests. OCHA Woreda Disaster Risk Profile was collected acknowledges the contributions made by from 300 woredas, of which profiles were Save the Children Fund, whose two-year developed for 200 woredas and Contingency tenure concluded at the end of the year and Plans for 50 woredas. who was replaced by HelpAge International. Donors Clusters OCHA gratefully acknowledges the The HRF gratefully acknowledges the generous financial support of donors to the important role played by Cluster leads who HRF which allowed time-critical are an important technical partner to the humanitarian interventions to support HRF. Cluster leads drive the review process chronic water, nutrition and agricultural and compile and submit comments on the needs. Donor funding also supported the technical merit of the proposals made by national effort in controlling the sudden Review Group members. They also provide outbreak of desert locust and help finance to close follow-up of the recommendations kick start the response efforts of made to the applicant organizations. accommodating the first arrivals of South Appreciation is also extended to World Food Sudanese refugees. As in past years, the UK Programme (WFP) and the United Nations was HRF’s largest supporter, contributing Children’s Fund (UNICEF) for managing 74 per cent of total funds received for the the supply pipelines (Corn-Soya Blend year, followed by the Governments of (CSB)/Oil) and Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Sweden (18 per cent), Switzerland (5 percent) and Ireland (3 percent). 1 HelpAge, World Vision Ethiopia and Child Fund. 5 | Page Food (RUTF) which are critical in ensuring achievement of common deliverables and minimum preparedness for rapid advancing learning opportunities within the humanitarian response. sector. Implementing Partners OCHA Staff and Management The HRF could not have fulfilled its OCHA acknowledges colleagues in the mandate without the active involvement of country office (including sub-offices) for its NGO and UN partners who responded to their expertise and timely input to project the needs of disaster-affected communities applications, in OCHA headquarters for the across Ethiopia, helping people and families valuable administrative services they to survive and rebuild their lives, and provided, including processing of restoring safety, dignity and hope. The very Memorandum of Understandings (MOUs) active participation of HRF partners in and disbursement of payments, and in ‘peer-to-peer’ monitoring missions in 2014, Funding Coordination Section (FCS) in an essential feature of HRF-supported OCHA New York headquarters for the high- projects, was consistently cited as level advisory services provided to the HRF contributing to the successful outcome of in the administration and management of projects by facilitating smooth engagement pooled funds. with government authorities, promoting the 6 | Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2014 Humanitarian Response Fund • 169,417 refugees were supported (HRF) funding strategy prioritized lifesaving through nutrition, WASH, health and interventions with limited engagements in emergency shelter/non-food items livelihood support. Despite significant needs interventions. across all sectors, the humanitarian response in Ethiopia remained underfunded given Complementarity with the Central more high-profile emergencies around the Emergency Response Fund (CERF) world during the year. As a result, the continued. In 2014, the HRF in support of national Humanitarian Requirements the Humanitarian Coordinator facilitated the Document (HRD) was only 58 per cent allocation of $33 million from CERF ($21 funded at the end of the year. million through the Rapid Response window and $12 million from the Underfunded The numbers of HRF donors declined from window). This included a $15 million nine in 2011 to four in 2014 with a donor special CERF allocation to countries income of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Land Use and Land Cover Change on Soil Erosion in Erer Sub
    land Article Effect of Land Use and Land Cover Change on Soil Erosion in Erer Sub-Basin, Northeast Wabi Shebelle Basin, Ethiopia Gezahegn Weldu Woldemariam 1,* and Arus Edo Harka 2 1 Geoinformation Science Program, School of Geography and Environmental Studies, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, 3220 Dire Dawa, Ethiopia 2 Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering Department, School of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Haramaya Institute of Technology (HiT), Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, 3220 Dire Dawa, Ethiopia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +251-091-096-1491 Received: 1 July 2019; Accepted: 10 August 2019; Published: 5 April 2020 Abstract: Land use and land cover change (LULCC) is a critical factor for enhancing the soil erosion risk and land degradation process in the Wabi Shebelle Basin. Up-to-date spatial and statistical data on basin-wide erosion rates can provide an important basis for planning and conservation of soil and water ecosystems. The objectives of this study were to examine the magnitude of LULCC and consequent changes in the spatial extent of soil erosion risk, and identify priority areas for Soil and Water Conservation (SWC) in the Erer Sub-Basin, Wabi Shebelle Basin, Ethiopia. The soil loss rates were estimated using an empirical prediction model of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) outlined in the ArcGIS environment. The estimated total annual actual soil loss at the sub-basin level was 1.01 million tons in 2000 and 1.52 million tons in 2018 with a mean erosion rate of 1 1 1 1 75.85 t ha− y− and 107.07 t ha− y− , respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Seroprevalence of Foot and Mouth Disease in Traditionally Managed Cattle in East and West Hararghe Zones, Ethiopia
    Seroprevalence of foot and mouth disease in traditionally managed cattle in East and West Hararghe zones, Ethiopia M. Yahya1 Z. Hailemariam2 L.B. Amare2* T. Rufael3 Keywords Summary Cattle – Foot and mouth disease Serological evidence of exposure to foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) virus – ELISA – Immunodiagnosis – was assessed in traditionally managed cattle in 21 districts of East and West Morbidity – Ethiopia. Hararghe zones in Oromiya State, Ethiopia, through a cross-sectional sur- vey conducted between November 2008 and March 2009. Sera collected from 504 cattle were tested for antibodies against FMDV using a commer- INFECTIEUSE PATHOLOGIE cial ELISA. Antibodies to FMDV were detected at an overall prevalence rate ■ of 11.6% [95% confidence interval (95CI): 8.6–14.5%]. In West Hararghe the seroprevalence was significantly (p < 0.05) higher (25.7%; 95CI: 19.6– 31.9%) than in East Hararghe (1.4%; 95CI: 0.0–3.3%). Location [odds ratio (OR) 0.87], altitude (OR 0.62), and age (OR 1.12) were found to be signifi- cant infection risk factors. Cattle sampled in the lowlands had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher FMDV seroprevalence (36.2%) than those in the highlands (3.4%). Furthermore, cattle in districts dominated by agropastoralists and those closer to the pastoral and agropastoral communities of Somali (6.4%) and Afar (21.3–46.1%) regional states showed higher seropositivity. The study found that FMDV circulated in the areas at a relatively low frequency, which may however increase because of unrestricted movement of animals within the region and across borders. Owing to the extensive livestock production system and difficulties in controlling livestock movement, alternative control strategies involving targeted surveillance, enhanced early disease recognition and reporting, and prophylactic vaccination are suggested as feasible options of FMD control in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • PASIDP-II Baseline Survey Report-Aug- 2019
    MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE (MoA) Final Baseline Survey Report Participatory Small-Scale Irrigation Development Programme II (PASSIDP II) RFP NO: RFP-PASIDPII /01/2017 August 2019 Addis Ababa Final Report Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................. I II. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 1 2.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................. 1 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROGRAM ......................................................... 3 2.2.1 Target Areas ....................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Target Groups .................................................................... 3 2.2.3 Development Objective and Components ............................... 4 2.3 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM ............................................................ 4 2.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY ........................................................... 4 2.5 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY ................................................................ 5 2.5.1 General .............................................................................. 5 2.5.2 Specific objectives ............................................................... 5 III. METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH OF THE STUDY .................... 12 3.1 APPROACH ............................................................................... 12 3.2 METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION .................................................... 12
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Displacement Monitoring Report (Oct – Dec 2015)
    INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT MONITORING REPORT October - December 2015 Executive Summary 1 TIGRAY The International Organization for Migration (IOM) Special Liaison Office (SLO) in AFAR Addis Ababa, with funding from the European Commission for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (ECHO), works with the Government of Ethiopia and humanitarian AMHARA partners to conduct internal displacement monitoring in multiple regions in Ethiopia. 65,766 The objective is to bring about timely and accurate data, on the causes, number of BENISHANGUL 7,945 GUMZ individuals displaced, locations of displacement as well needs verses response, in order DIRE DAWA ADDIS ABABA to improve humanitarian response and to advocate for durable solutions. HARERI OROMIA The Internal Displacement Monitoring Report (IDMR) is compiled and presented GAMBELLA on a quarterly basis. It is an activity jointly undertaken by IOM, National Disaster SOMALI 2,870 Management Coordination Council (NDMCC), Regional Disaster Prevention and SNNP 29,745 Preparedness Bureaus (DPPBs), humanitarian partners, and NGO partners in order to ensure a more targeted, coordinated and needs based response. The quarterly IDMR 76,170 for the period October to december 2015 incorporated a trend analysis comparing the 495 same quarter in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015; with the intention to show the reader the New displacement by Region scale, dynamics and seasonal trends of internal displacement over time. (October - December 2015) 2 Methodology The methods used to collect data for the quarterly Internal Matrix (DTM) and IDP registrations in ‘protracted’2 IDP sites. In Displacement Monitoring Report were: Key informant interviews with addition, IOM used census data and government led joint multi- local authorities and IDP representatives, Focus Group Discussions agency assessment reports to validate the data.
    [Show full text]
  • On Farm Diversity Conservation Assessment and Characterization Of
    South Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2021; 1(2): 01-05 E-ISSN: 2788-9297 P-ISSN: 2788-9289 SAJAS 2021; 1(2): 01-05 On farm diversity conservation assessment and Received: 01-05-2021 Accepted: 03-06-2021 characterization of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L)) Chala Tamiru Moench) landraces in Eastern Hararghe, Ethiopia Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute, Harar Biodiversity Centre, Ethiopia Chala Tamiru Abstract This study was aimed at providing an assessment on farm diversity conservation status and the characterization of sorghum landraces to document diversity of sorghum landrace, characterize variety and assess how farmers in the study area practices seed management system of indigenous sorghum landrace at farming community. Eighty House hold from eight kebeles in four woredas of eastern Hararghe zone were chosen and reviewed. Structured questionnaire survey of households, focused group discussions, key informant interviews and field observations were used to collect data. The main traits farmers use to prefer a given variety over the other were maturity, yield potential, animal feed, grain size, grain color, tillering capacity, market demand. With look upon distribution category, most of the recorded landraces of sorghum were endangered and rare. Farmers from different study locations have reported several landraces to be endangered. Most of the recorded landraces of sorghum were endangered and rare which is near to threatened indicating the need for conservation of the landraces. On-farm conservation can remain workable, depending on the sensitivity of landraces to different factors causes farmers varieties become extinct and their capacity to develop and adapt to these factors. It can provide options to farmers and community to adapt to factors that causes farmers varieties lost.
    [Show full text]
  • In Gurewa District, East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia
    RELEVANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF FARMER TRAINING CENTERS (FTCs) IN GUREWA DISTRICT, EAST HARARGHE ZONE, OROMIA REGIONAL STATE, ETHIOPIA. Suleymen Abdureman Omer1 Haramaya University Tesfaye Lemma Tefera2 Haramaya University Fekadu Beyene Kenee3 Haramaya University Abstract Agriculture is the backbone of Ethiopia country economic development strategy and the main source of livelihood in terms of employment, generating foreign currency and raw materials for industries. Farmer Training Centers (FTCs) was established as a means to develop human resource and enhance innovation needed to transform the sector to productive and market oriented system. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the relevance and effectiveness of FTCs in Gurawa woreda in terms of changes in knowledge, attitude and practical levels, and explore institutional linkages with of the FTCs. This study used cross-sectional survey method to obtain the necessary data in 2018/19 production season. The data was obtained from 120 (60 trained and 60 untrained) randomly selected respondents from 4 kebeles using probability proportion to size sampling method. In addition, KII, FGD, and review of available record at FTCs were used for data collection. Relevance of FTCs were obtained based on the identifications of farmers’ needs and constraints, content of training, training delivery methods, selection criteria of trainees and appropriateness of period, duration and schedules of trainings were vary among the sampled in the area. Effectiveness of FTCs were identified based on the obtained result of knowledge, attitude and practical assessment of trained and untrained farmers, their mean difference of trained farmers towards the given technologies and commodities were significantly higher than untrained farmers at 1%, 1%, and 5% (p=0.01,0.01 and 0.05) of probability level respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Oromiya 4 Zone Code Wereda Code Town Code West
    REGION - OROMIYA 4 ZONE CODE WEREDA CODE TOWN CODE WEST WELEGA 01 MENE SIBU 01 MENDI 1 NEJO 02 NEJO 1 WERE JIRU 2 GORI 3 GIMBI 03 HOMA 1 LALO ASABI 04 ENANGO 1 DENIGORO 2 KILTU KARA 05 KILTU KARA 1 BOJI DIRMEJ 06 BILA 2 AYIRA GULISO 07 GULISO 1 AYIRA 2 JARSO 08 GEBA DEFINO 1 KONDALA 09 GEBA DEFNO 1 BOJI CHEKORSA 10 CHEKORSA 1 BABO GAMBEL 11 DEBEKA 1 YUBDO 12 YUBDO 1 GENJI 13 GENJI 1 HARU 14 GUYU 1 NOLE KABA 15 BUBE 1 BEGI 16 BEGI 1 KOBER 2 GIMBI /TOWN/ 17 GIMBE 1 SEYO NOLE 18 DEBESO 1 EAST WELEGA 02 LIMU 01 GELILA 1 IBANTU 02 HINDE 1 GIDA KIREMU 03 GIDA AYANA 1 KIREMU 2 GUTEN 3 HORO LIMU 04 BONIYA BUSHE 05 BILO 1 WAYU TUKA 06 GEBA JIMATA 1 GUDEYA BILA 07 JERE 1 BILA 2 GOBU SEYO 08 ANO 1 OROMIYA (Cont'd) ZONE CODE WEREDA CODE TOWN CODE EAST WELEGA 02 SIBU SIRE 09 SIRE 1 DIGA 10 ARJO GUDETU 1 IFA 2 SASIGA 11 GALO 1 LEKA DULECHA 12 GETEMA 1 GUTO GIDA 13 DIGA 1 JIMA ARJO 14 ARJO 1 NUNU KUMBA 15 NUNU 1 WAMA HAGELO 16 NEKEMTE /TOWN/ 17 NEKEMTE 1 ILU ABA BORA 03 DARIMU 01 DUPA 1 ALGE SACHI 02 ALGE 1 SUPE 2 CHORA 03 KUMBABE 1 DEGA 04 DEGA 1 DABO HANA 05 KONE 1 GECHI 06 GECHI 1 BORECHA 07 YANFU 1 DEDESA 08 DENBI 1 YAYU 09 YAYU 1 METU ZURIYA 10 ALE 11 GORE 1 BURE 12 BURE 01 1 SIBU 2 NONO SELE 13 BIRBIRSA 1 OROMIYA (Cont'd) ZONE CODE WEREDA CODE TOWN CODE ILU ABA BORA 03 BICHO 14 BICHO 1 BILO NOPHA 15 NOPA 1 HURUMU 16 HURUMU 1 DIDU 17 LALO 1 MAKO 18 MAKO 1 HUKA /HALU/ 19 HUKA 01 1 METU TOWN 20 METU 1 BEDELE TOWN 21 BEDELE 1 BEDELE ZURIYA 22 - 1 CHEWAKA 23 ILU HARERE 1 DORENI 24 JIMA 04 LIMU SEKA 01 ANTAGO 1 LIMU KOSA 02 LIMU GENET 1 AMBUYE 2 BABU
    [Show full text]
  • Food Supply Prospect
    2006 Food Supply Prospect EWS EARLY WARNING SYSTEM January 2006 Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Agency P.O. Box 5686 Tell. 5518050 / 5158236 E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] Website: www.dppc.gov.et TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE List of Glossary of Local Names and Acronyms 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 10 12 Part One: Food Security Prospects in Pastoral and Agro-pastoral Areas 1.1 Somali Region 12 1.2 Afar Region 16 1.3 Borena Zone (Oromiya Region) 20 1.4 South Omo Zone (SNNPR) 23 24 Part Two: Food Security Prospects in Crop Dependent Areas 2.1 Tigray Region 24 2.2 Amhara Region 28 2.3 Oromiya Region 32 2.4 Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region (SNNPR) 36 2.5 Dire Dawa Administrative council 39 2.6 Harari Region 41 2.7 Benshangul Gumuz Region 43 2.8 Gambella Region 45 Tables: Table 1: Affected Population Needing Food Assistance in 2006 in MT 8 Table 2: Monthly Breakdown of Population Needing Assistance and Food 8 Requirements by Region Table 3: Affected Population and Food aid Requirement for 2006 in Somali by Zone 15 Table 4: Affected Population and Food aid Requirement for 2006 in Afar by Zone 19 Table 5: Affected Population and Food Aid Requirement for 2006 in Amhara by Zone 31 Table 6: Affected Population and Food Aid Requirement for 2006 in Oromiya by Zone 35 Table 7: Affected Population and Food Aid Requirement for 2006 in SNNPR by Zone 38 Table 8: Affected population and food aid requirement for 2006 in Benshangul Gumuz 44 Table 9: Affected population and food requirement for 2006 in Gambella by Zone 46
    [Show full text]
  • Project Implementation Manual Final Draft
    THE NATIONAL REGIONAL GOVERNMENT OF OROMIA OROMIA ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHNAGE AUTHORITY Oromia National Regional State Forested Landscape Program (Project ID P156475) Project Implementation Manual Final Draft (2017-2022) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia April 25, 2017 i Abbreviations and Acronyms A/R Afforestation/Reforestation AD Activity Data AF Additional Finance AGP Agricultural Growth Program AWP&B Annual Work Plan and Budget BioCF BioCarbon Fund BMERP Bale Mountains Eco-region REDD+ Project BoANR Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resource BoFEC Bureaus of Finance and Economic Cooperation BoLFD Bureau of Livetsock and Fishery Development BoRLAU Bureau of Rural Land Adminsitration and Use BoWME Bureau of Water, Minerals and Energy BSM Benefit Sharing Mechanism CBO Community Based Organization CPO Cooperative Promotion Office CQS Selection Based Consultants’ Qualifications CRGE Climate Resilient Green Economy DA Development Agent EIO Ethiopian Institute of Ombudsman EMA Ethiopian Mapping Agency ER Emissions Reductions ERPA Emissions Reductions Purchase Agreement ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework FA Force Account FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FREL Forest Reference Emission Level FRL Forest Reference Level GHG Greenhouse GIS Geographic Information System GoE Government of Ethiopia GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism ii GTP Growth and Transformation Plan IBRD International Bank of Reconstruction and Development ICB International Competitive Bidding ICS Improved Cook Stoves IDA International Development
    [Show full text]
  • HRF Master File 2016
    ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Fund Update December 8, 2016 Back 2016 2016 Under Projected No. of Supported Income Allocations Review funding in Projects ‐ 80 hand • UN ‐ 14 • US$ 81.4 • US$ 74 • US$ 0.7 •NGOs ‐ 66 • US 6.6 million million million million 2016 Total Income US$ (million) Balance from 2015 35.0 Saving from prior period 0.3 2016 Donors Contributions US$ (million) 2016 EHF Allocations by Sector United Kingdom (DFID) 27.3 Denmark 4.4 25,000,000 Australia 3.0 Sweden 1.0 Switzerland 1.0 20,000,000 Germany 2.3 Korea 0.5 15,000,000 OFDA 6.7 10,000,000 Total 81.4 5,000,000 2016 Pledges US$ (million) 0 Ireland 2.0 Total 2.0 2016 Allocations US$ (million) Applications completed 71.9 * Applications under Approval/MoU process 0.0 2016 EHF Allocations by Region Application waiting for HC's endorsement 0.0 25,000,000 OCHA HQ Overheads (estimate) 2.2 20,000,000 Total Allocations 74.0 15,000,000 Funding in Hand 7.4 10,000,000 5,000,000 Applications Under Review US $ (million) Applications under consideration 0.7 0 Estimated PSC 0.02 Total 0.7 Projected funding in hand 6.6 N.B: Please note that the figures are as per the Ethiopia office management accounts record. ETHIOPIA EHF Update December 8, 2016 Back Deliverables as per indicators identified in applications funded in 2016 Nutrition Allocated Budget = US$ 22,724,562 Beneficiaries 27,845 SAM 59,490 MAM 43,803 PLW OTP/SC 1,062 OTPs to be established 248 SCs to be established Training 1,304 Health Extension Workers 1,525 Government staff 19,219 Health Development Armies 281 Community volunteers
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Requirements 2014
    Humanitarian Requirements 2014 Credit : UN/Marco Domino Joint Government and Humanitarian Partners’ Document January 2014 Addis Ababa Ethiopia TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS/GLOSSARY ......................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 4 1.1. 2014 ANNUAL HUMANITARIAN REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT ........................................................................... 4 1.2. HUMANITARIAN SITUATION OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 4 2. REVIEW OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 2013 HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE ................................................................................................................... 7 2.1RELIEF FOOD AND TSF .............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 HEALTH AND NUTRITION ...................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE (WASH) .................................................................................................... 13 2.4 AGRICULTURE ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]