Hydrologic Characterization of the Fountain Formation: Prospective Aquifer Storage and Recovery Targets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Hydrology Days 2017 Hydrologic Characterization of the Fountain Formation: Prospective Aquifer Storage and Recovery Targets Daniel F. Collazo Department of Geosciences, Colorado State University Abstract. Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) is a method of water storage that typically involves using the same well to inject water into and recover water from an aquifer. Benefits of ASR include lower capital costs than surface storage methods as well as negligible loss due to evaporation. This method of storing water shows promise for northern Colorado because of the location of existing water supply infrastructure and bedrock aquifers along the Front Range. A potential storage zone for ASR in northern Colorado is the Fountain Formation. The Fountain is a Pennsylvanian-Permian arkosic conglomeratic sandstone with interbedded siltstone and shale that outcrops along the Front Range of northern Colorado. The Fountain is about 800 ft (244 m) thick and dips to the east which gives it the potential for large storage capacity and large yields. This study characterizes the geology and hydrology of the Fountain Formation to assess the feasibility of the Fountain as a storage zone for ASR in northern Colorado. The wide range of facies present in the Fountain were classified and the air permeability of each was measured. Data on existing wells in the Fountain was collected from the Colorado Division of Water Resources AquaMap to estimate the hydraulic properties of the formation. The Fountain has 144 wells in Larimer County with depths of up to 1100 feet and yields ranging from 0.45 to 300 GPM. Calculated specific capacity for wells in the Fountain ranges from 0.0008 to 5 GPM/ft. The Fountain Formation has relatively low measured permeability, but is utilized as a water source along the Front Range and shows the potential for large storage capacity and yields. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Cyclicity, Dune Migration, and Wind Velocity in Lower Permian Eolian Strata, Manitou Springs, CO
Cyclicity, Dune Migration, and Wind Velocity in Lower Permian Eolian Strata, Manitou Springs, CO by James Daniel Pike, B.S. A Thesis In Geology Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCES Approved Dustin E. Sweet Chair of Committee Tom M. Lehman Jeffery A. Lee Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School August, 2017 Copyright 2017, James D. Pike Texas Tech University, James Daniel Pike, August 2017 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my greatest thanks to my advisor Dr. Dustin Sweet, who was an excellent advisor during this research. Dr. Sweet was vital throughout the whole process, be it answering questions, giving feedback on figures, and imparting his extensive knowledge of the ancestral Rocky Mountains on me; for this I am extremely grateful. Dr. Sweet allowed me to conduct my own research without looking over my shoulder, but was always available when needed. When I needed a push, Dr. Sweet provided it. I would like to thank my committee memebers, Dr. Lee and Dr. Lehman for providing feedback and for their unique perspectives. I would like to thank Jenna Hessert, Trent Jackson, and Khaled Chowdhury for acting as my field assistants. Their help in taking measurements, collecting samples, recording GPS coordinates, and providing unique perspectives was invaluable. Thank you to Melanie Barnes for allowing me to use her lab, and putting up with the mess I made. This research was made possible by a grant provided by the Colorado Scientific Society, and a scholarship provided by East Texas Geological Society.
[Show full text]
To Download Elementary School Geology Packet
Garden of the Gods Park Contact: Bowen Gillings City of Colorado Springs Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Email: [email protected] P: (719) 219-0108 Program updates can be found at: https://gardenofgods.com/educational/edu- 1/school-field-trips Land Use Acknowledgement: We gratefully acknowledge the native peoples on whose ancestral homeland we gather, as well as the diverse and vibrant Native communities of Colorado today. Geology of the Park Program Welcome! We look forward to sharing the geological story of Garden of the Gods with your students. We align with current Colorado Academic Standards for K-5 Earth and Space Science. Goals: Students recognize the exceptional geological wonder of the Garden of the Gods. Students gain a broad understanding of the geological events that shaped the Pikes Peak region Students gain a broad understanding of and appreciation for the science of geology. Students identify the three rock types and the three geological processes. Students recognize the geological formations in the Park, their ages, and composition. 1 Teacher Reference Guide: Basic Geology of Garden of the Gods The Pike’s Peak region has been shaped by millions of years of mountain building and erosion. There have been three different mountain building events in the geological history of this area: 1. The Ancestral Rockies (320-310 million years ago). The erosion of these first Rocky Mountains formed the sedimentary Fountain Formation and the Lyons Sandstone layers. 2. The Laramide Orogeny (70-65 million years ago). This process uplifted the Front Range. The layers seen in the Garden were forced upright as the land broke along the Rampart Range Fault.
[Show full text]
Garden of the Gods at Colorado Springs: Paleozoic and Mesozoic Sedimentation and Tectonics Marcus R
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Liberty University Digital Commons Liberty University DigitalCommons@Liberty University Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Biology and Chemistry 2010 Garden of the Gods at Colorado Springs: Paleozoic and Mesozoic Sedimentation and Tectonics Marcus R. Ross Liberty University, [email protected] William A. Hoesch Steven A. Austin John H. Whitmore Timothy L. Clarey Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/bio_chem_fac_pubs Part of the Biology Commons, and the Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Ross, Marcus R.; Hoesch, William A.; Austin, Steven A.; Whitmore, John H.; and Clarey, Timothy L., "Garden of the Gods at Colorado Springs: Paleozoic and Mesozoic Sedimentation and Tectonics" (2010). Faculty Publications and Presentations. Paper 114. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/bio_chem_fac_pubs/114 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology and Chemistry at DigitalCommons@Liberty University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Liberty University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Geological Society of America Field Guide 18 2010 Garden of the Gods at Colorado Springs: Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentation and tectonics Marcus R. Ross Department of Biology and Chemistry, Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia 24502, USA William A. Hoesch Consultant, 9310 Fanita Parkway, Santee, California 92071, USA Steven A. Austin Austin Research Consulting Inc., 23619 Calle Ovieda, Ramona, California 92065, USA John H. Whitmore Science and Mathematics Department, Cedarville University, Cedarville, Ohio 45314, USA Timothy L. Clarey Geosciences Department, Delta College, University Center, Michigan 48710, USA ABSTRACT Exposed along the southeast ﬂ ank of the Colorado Front Range are rocks that beautifully illustrate the interplay of sedimentation and tectonics.
[Show full text]
Geologic Characterization 111 Date 7/31/91 List of Appendices
Characterization GEOLOGIC Prepared by ? TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ........................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Characterization .............................. 1 1.2.1 Literature Search .... ........................... 1 1.2.2 Core Processing and Description ..................... 2 1.2.3 Reprocessing of Seismic Data ........................ 2 1.2.4 Grain Size Analysis .............................. 2 1.2.5 Geologic Report ................................ 3 1.3 Location and General Setting ...., ........................ 3 1.4 Previous Studies ...................................... 5 2.0 STRATIGRAPHY ....................................... 7 Precambrian ......................................... 2.1 7 2.2 Paleozoic And Mesozoic Sedimentary Section ................ 2.2.1 Fountain Formation (PennsylvanianPermian) ............ 7 2.2.2 Lyons Sandstone Formation (Permian) ................ 7 2.2.3 Lykins Formation (PermianrTriassic) ................. 10 2.2.4 Ralston Creek Formation (Jiurassic) .................. 10 2.2.5 Momson Formation (Jurassic) ...................... 10 2.2.6 Dakota Group (Lower Cretaceous) ................... 10 2.2.7 Benton Shale Formation (Lower/Upper Cretaceous) ....... 11 2.2.8 Niobrara Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 11 2.2.9 Pierre Shale Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............. 11 2.2.10 Fox Hills Sandstone Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ....... 12 2.2.1 1 Laramie Formation (Upper Cretaceous) ............... 12 2.2.12
[Show full text]
The Lower Palaeozoic Shale Gas Play in Southern Scandinavian: Rocks, Risks and Resources Schovsbo N., Nielsen A.T
Editorial Board: Katarzyna Sobień, Joanna Roszkowska-Remin, Anna Bagińska, Ireneusz Dyrka, Marcin Janas Graphic design by: Monika Cyrklewicz Cover photo: Katarzyna Skurczyńska-Garwolińska Layout: Bloor Typesetting: Anna Majewska, Jadwiga Gac-Jachowicz © Polish Geological Institute – National Research Institute Warsaw 2014 ISBN 978-83-7863-381-5 Endorsement: Business support: P O L S K A http://infolupki.pgi.gov.pl Contents ORAL PRESENTATIONS GAS SHALE FORMATIONS IN CARPATHo-DANUBIAN AREA – AN OVERVIEW Anastasiu N. .......................................................................................................... 11 SHALE GAS POTENTIAL IN CARBONIFEROUS UNITS OF THE SOUTH PORTUGUESE ZONE: A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Barberes G., Fonseca P., Pena dos Reis R., Pimentel N., Azevedo M. ....................................................... 12 HYDROCARBON ANOMALIES IN THE CARBONIFEROUS UNITS OF THE SOUTH PORTUGUESE ZONE USING THE Thorium-NORMALIZED METHOD (GaMMA RADIAtion) Barberes G., Pena dos Reis R., Pimentel N., Fonseca P., Azevedo M. ....................................................... 13 OIL SHALE FORMATION IN THE UPPER CRETACEOUS NENJIANG FORMATION OF THE SONGLIAO BASIN (NE China) Bechtel A., Jia J., Sachsenhofer R.F., Liu Z., Strobl S.A.I., Sun P. ............................................................ 14 SILURIAN BLACK SHALES IN RUSSIA Bogolepova O.K., Gubanov A.P. ........................................................................................ 15 CLAY MINERALOGY AND MAJOR ELEMENT GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE UPPER TRIASSIC
[Show full text]
Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
[Show full text]
Pennsylvanian Stratigraphy of the Colorado Springs Quadrangle, Colorado
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1947 Pennsylvanian Stratigraphy of the Colorado Springs Quadrangle, Colorado. Kenneth Phelps Mclaughlin Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mclaughlin, Kenneth Phelps, "Pennsylvanian Stratigraphy of the Colorado Springs Quadrangle, Colorado." (1947). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 7899. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/7899 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the master's and doctor's degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Library are available for inspection. Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author. Bibliographical references may be noted3 but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission# Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work# A library which borrows this thesis for use by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions, LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 119-a PENN3YLVAHIAN STRATIGRAPHY OF THE COLORADO SFRIN3S Q U A D R A T E , COLORADO A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanicg ! College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Geology by Kenneth Phelps McLaughlin B«A«, University of Missouri, 1939 M.A., University of Missouri, 1941 May, 1947 UMI Number: DP69277 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
[Show full text]
Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]
Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, 411 379 Bear River Formation, 163 Abo Formation, 281, 282, 286, 302 seismicity, 22 Bear Springs Formation, 315 Absaroka Mountains, 111 Appalachian Orogen, 5, 9, 13, 28 Bearpaw cyclothem, 80 Absaroka sequence, 37, 44, 50, 186, Appalachian Plateau, 9, 427 Bearpaw Mountains, 111 191,233,251, 275, 377, 378, Appalachian Province, 28 Beartooth Mountains, 201, 203 383, 409 Appalachian Ridge, 427 Beartooth shelf, 92, 94 Absaroka thrust fault, 158, 159 Appalachian Shelf, 32 Beartooth uplift, 92, 110, 114 Acadian orogen, 403, 452 Appalachian Trough, 460 Beaver Creek thrust fault, 157 Adaville Formation, 164 Appalachian Valley, 427 Beaver Island, 366 Adirondack Mountains, 6, 433 Araby Formation, 435 Beaverhead Group, 101, 104 Admire Group, 325 Arapahoe Formation, 189 Bedford Shale, 376 Agate Creek fault, 123, 182 Arapien Shale, 71, 73, 74 Beekmantown Group, 440, 445 Alabama, 36, 427,471 Arbuckle anticline, 327, 329, 331 Belden Shale, 57, 123, 127 Alacran Mountain Formation, 283 Arbuckle Group, 186, 269 Bell Canyon Formation, 287 Alamosa Formation, 169, 170 Arbuckle Mountains, 309, 310, 312, Bell Creek oil field, Montana, 81 Alaska Bench Limestone, 93 328 Bell Ranch Formation, 72, 73 Alberta shelf, 92, 94 Arbuckle Uplift, 11, 37, 318, 324 Bell Shale, 375 Albion-Scioio oil field, Michigan, Archean rocks, 5, 49, 225 Belle Fourche River, 207 373 Archeolithoporella, 283 Belt Island complex, 97, 98 Albuquerque Basin, 111, 165, 167, Ardmore Basin, 11, 37, 307, 308, Belt Supergroup, 28, 53 168, 169 309, 317, 318, 326, 347 Bend Arch, 262, 275, 277, 290, 346, Algonquin Arch, 361 Arikaree Formation, 165, 190 347 Alibates Bed, 326 Arizona, 19, 43, 44, S3, 67.
[Show full text]
EIS-0386-DEIS-02-2007.Pdf
Draft WWEC PEIS September 2007 DOCUMENT CONTENTS VOLUME I Executive Summary Chapter 1: Why Are Federal Agencies Proposing to Designate Energy Corridors in the West? Chapter 2: What Are the Alternatives Evaluated in This PEIS? Chapter 3: What Are the Potential Environmental Consequences of Corridor Designation and Land Use Plan Amendment? Chapter 4: How Are Cumulative Impacts Evaluated? Chapter 5: What Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Might Be Caused by Corridor Designation and Land Use Plan Amendment? Chapter 6: The Relationship between Local Short-Term Uses of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity Chapter 7: What Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources Would Be Involved with Implementation of the Alternatives? Chapter 8: List of Preparers Chapter 9: References Chapter 10: Glossary VOLUME II Appendix A: Proposed Land Use Plan Amendments Appendix B: Summary of Public Scoping Comments for the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Designation of Energy Corridors on Federal Land in the 11 Western States (DOE/FS-0386) Appendix C: Tribal Consultation Appendix D: Federal and State Regulatory Requirements Potentially Applicable When Designating Energy Corridors Appendix E: Energy Transport Technologies and Hypothetical Energy Transport Projects Appendix F: Section 368 Corridor Parameters Appendix G: Sensitive Resource Areas That Would Be Intersected by Proposed West-wide Energy Corridors Appendix H: Geographic Information System Data Appendix I: Summary of WWEC PEIS Webcasts for Corridor Review and Revision, 6/19/06 to 4/24/07
[Show full text]
Paleontological Technical Report: Cdot Project Nh 0242-040, Us Highway 24 West Corridor, Manitou Springs to Interstate 25, El Paso County, Colorado
PALEONTOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT: CDOT PROJECT NH 0242-040 , US HIGHWAY 24 WEST CORRIDOR, MANITOU SPRINGS TO INTERSTATE 25, EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared for: Dr. Christian J. Zier, Director Centennial Archaeology, Inc. 300 E Boardwalk, Bldg. 4-C Fort Collins, CO 80525 Prepared by: Paul C. Murphey, Ph.D. and David J. Daitch Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Paleontology 4614 Lonespur Ct. 470A Brook Circle Oceanside CA 92056 Boulder CO 80302 760-758-4019, 303-514-1095 303-818-6072, 303-442-0527 www.rockymountainpaleontology.com Prepared under State of Colorado Paleontological Permit 2008-36 December 31, 2008 CDOT Project NH-0242-40: Paleontological Technical Report 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 DEFINITION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES........... 4 3.0 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 6 4.0. LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS......................................... 7 4.1. Federal................................................................................................................................. 7 4.2. State..................................................................................................................................... 8 4.3.
[Show full text]
RESEARCH Provenance of Pennsylvanian–Permian
RESEARCH Provenance of Pennsylvanian–Permian sedimentary rocks associated with the Ancestral Rocky Mountains orogeny in southwestern Laurentia: Implications for continental-scale Laurentian sediment transport systems Ryan J. Leary1, Paul Umhoefer2, M. Elliot Smith2, Tyson M. Smith3, Joel E. Saylor4, Nancy Riggs2, Greg Burr2, Emma Lodes2, Daniel Foley2, Alexis Licht5, Megan A. Mueller5, and Chris Baird5 1DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY, SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO 87801, USA 2SCHOOL OF EARTH AND SUSTAINABILITY, NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY, FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA 86011, USA 3DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77204, USA 4DEPARTMENT OF EARTH, OCEAN AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA V6T1Z4, CANADA 5DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98195, USA ABSTRACT The Ancestral Rocky Mountains system consists of a series of basement-cored uplifts and associated sedimentary basins that formed in southwestern Laurentia during Early Pennsylvanian–middle Permian time. This system was originally recognized by aprons of coarse, arkosic sandstone and conglomerate within the Paradox, Eagle, and Denver Basins, which surround the Front Range and Uncompahgre basement uplifts. However, substantial portions of Ancestral Rocky Mountain–adjacent basins are filled with carbonate or fine-grained quartzose material that is distinct from proximal arkosic rocks, and detrital zircon data from basins adjacent to the Ancestral Rocky Moun- tains have been interpreted to indicate that a substantial proportion of their clastic sediment was sourced from the Appalachian and/or Arctic orogenic belts and transported over long distances across Laurentia into Ancestral Rocky Mountain basins. In this study, we pres- ent new U-Pb detrital zircon data from 72 samples from strata within the Denver Basin, Eagle Basin, Paradox Basin, northern Arizona shelf, Pedregosa Basin, and Keeler–Lone Pine Basin spanning ~50 m.y.
[Show full text]
The Colorado Plateau
The Colorado Plateau An OUGS Severnside Field Trip 2015 The Colorado Plateau 2015 Introduction This was to be another Severnside trip, but one with a new organiser! Janet Hiscott and Tom Sharpe had devised the idea for this trip when talking about what he would do in his retirement from the Museum of Wales. The large group of 27 members that collected in Denver at the end of September 2015 were the beneficiaries of this chat. We were all eager to explore the Colorado Plateau with Janet and Tom to guide us. The Colorado Plateau is an area between the Rockies and the Basin and Range Province and extends through parts of 4 states, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona. (Fig. 1) It contains some of the most famous and most visited National Parks of the USA and we were here for 17 days to be introduced to the geology, paleontology and human interaction with and exploitation of the region. The Rockies have been through several cycles of uplift and erosion since the Precambrian, the most recent period of uplift started 5Ma ago and the area has seen a change in elevation of 5000ft. There was associated volcanic activity, building volcanoes and causing a redistribution of metals by heated fluids. The latter having been exploited by man in the Colorado Mineral Belt. The debris eroded from the Rockies during these successive periods of upift was deposited in the plains surrounding them. These sediments, and marine deposits from a period of inundation by an inland sea, form the level beds that comprise the Colorado plateau.
[Show full text]