DOCSLIB.ORG

The Presidential Inauguration Commemorative Medals (Picms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Presidential Inauguration Commemorative Medals (Picms The Presidential Inauguration Hui and Tong Meng Hui / Tung Men Hui. Between 1895 Commemorative Medals (PICMs) and 1911, Dr. Sun organized numerous uprisings against the Manchu Dynasty. When the revolution in Wuchang Republic of China (1912 - 1924) broke out on October 10, 1911, Dr. Sun was in exile in the United States lobbying for financial support from King Kwok Chinese overseas and from the western governments. In December 1911, Dr. Sun returned to Shanghai and was Introduction immediately elected by the revolutionaries as the Provisional President. This article explores the presidential inauguration commemorative medals (PICM) of the Republic of China On January 1, 1912, Dr. Sun declared the establishment issued between 1912 and 1924 and discusses the political of the Provisional Government of the Republic of China / military figures who became the Presidents of the in Nanjing / Nanking. Nevertheless, due to the lack of Republic of China during that period. The outbreak of financial support and unity between different factions of the Revolution on October 10, 1911 did not result in the the revolutionaries, the tide of war with the Imperial swift collapse of the Manchu / Qing / Ching Dynasty. Army under the command of Yuan Shi-kai was turning Though China was eventually declared a republic in early against the revolutionary forces. On the brink of defeat, 1912, the establishment of a Republican Government in Dr Sun was forced to compromise with Yuan. As a result, Beijing / Peking (also called the Beiyang / Peiyang on February 12, 1912, the baby emperor Pu Yi was Government) only marked the beginning of power dethroned. Dr. Sun resigned from the Provisional struggles and civil wars which resulted in frequent Presidency and recommended Yuan as the 2nd changes in the presidency of the Republic of China. Provisional President. When Yuan broke his promise and established a dictatorship in 1913, Dr. Sun organized the Second Revolution against Yuan, but his efforts were unsuccessful. Dr. Sun spent the rest of his life building the Nationalist Party/Kuomintang and fighting the warlords. Figure 1: Dr. Sun Yat-sen. Dr. Sun Yat-sen (lst Provisional President: January 1, 1912-April 1, 1912) Dr. Sun Yat-sen (1866-1925) (Figure 1) was the national founder of the Republic of China. He was the leader of the secret organizations, Xing Zhong Hui / Hsin Chung Figure 2: Yuan Shi-kai/Yuan Shih-kai. 2 JOMSA Yuan Shi-kai (2nd Provisional President: March 10, 1912-October 9, 1913, 1st President: October 10, 1913-June 6, 1916) Yuan Shi-kai / Yuan Shih-kai (1859-1916) (Figure 2) emerged quickly in the political arena after the disastrous defeat of Imperial China in the Sino-Japanese War in 1894. Yuan was an advocate of the westernization of the Imperial Army. Consequently, in 1895, Yuan was appointed as the Commander of the "Newly Created Army" which later formed the Beiyang ! Peiyang Army Group. During the Boxer Rebellion in 1900, unlike most Chinese officials who adopted a hostile attitude towards foreigners, Yuan suppressed the Boxers in Shantung Province and prevented the clash of his troops with the Allied Forces of the Eight Nations. After the death of Li Hong-zhang / Li Hung-chang in 1901, Yuan succeeded Li as the Viceroy of the Zhili ! Chihli (which covered Beijing), as Beiyang Commissioner, and as commander of the Beiyang Army Group. After the Revolution broke out, Yuan was appointed as the Prime Minister of Cabinet on November 1, 1911 and charged with the suppression of the revolutionaries. Yuan took advantage of the situation by fighting and negotiating with the revolutionaries on the one hand and urging the Manchu Court to abdicate on the other hand. Eventually, in February 1912, the baby emperor, Pu Yi, Figure 3: Li Yuan-hong/Li Yuan-hung. was dethroned and Dr Sun Yat-sen also resigned from the Provisional Presidency. On March 10, 1912, Yuan who was not a revolutionary himself, was the commander was inaugurated in Beijing as the 2nd Provisional of the brigade in which the junior officers started the President. Afterwards, Yuan changed the capital from Revolution in Wuchang, Hubei Province, on October Nanjing to Beijing to further strengthen his power. 10, 1911. His subordinates pushed him to join the Violating his promise to uphold the Provisional revolutionaries and assume the role of the Military Constitution, Yuan plotted the assassination of Song Jiao- Governor ! Dou Du of the Revolutionary Military yen, the majority leader in the National Assembly in Government of Hubei Province. Then, he was elected as March 1913, and then successfully suppressed the Second the Provisional Vice-President when Dr Sun Yat-sen was Revolution organized by Dr Sun. elected as the 1 st Provisional President in Shanghai. He was also the Vice-President during Yuan Shi-kai’s On October 10, 1913, Yuan was inaugurated in Beijing presidency. He became an adherent of Yuan and took an as the 1st President of the Republic of China. In 1914, active role in the suppression of the revolutionaries. Yuan established his dictatorship by dissolving the Nevertheless, in December 1913, Yuan forced Li to resign National Assembly and abolishing the Provisional as the Military Governor of Hubei Province, causing Li Constitution. In December 1915, Yuan even proclaimed to lose his military power. In return, when Yuan himself the "Hong Xian" Emperor. Opposition proclaimed himself the "Hong Xian" Emperor, Li throughout the country immediately arose. Yuan had’to withdrew his support to Yuan by refusing to accept the suspend his monarchical movement in March of 1916 title of honor conferred by Yuan. and died on June 6, 1916. After Yuan’s death in 1916, Li, as the Vice-President, Li Yuan-hong (President: became the President. But the real power was in the hands June 7, 1916-July 30, 1917) of the Prime Minister, Duan Ji-rui / Tuan Chi-jui (1865- 1936) (Figure 4) who was the warlord of the Anhui/ Li Yuan-hong/Li Yuan-hung (1864-1928) (Figure 3), Anhwei clique. In 1917, Li disagreed with Duan over Vol. 55, No. 1 3 (Duan was born in Anhui Province. The warlords under his leadership were called the Anhui clique.) Feng, with his power base in Jiangsu Province, also built up his Zhili clique (as Feng was born in Zhili). Figure 4: Duan Ji-rui/Tuan Chi-Jui. the issue of China’s participation in the First World War against Germany. Hoping that another warlord, Zhang Xun, would help counterbalance the power of Duan, Li Figure 5: Feng Guo-zhang/Feng Kuo-chang. brought Zhang Xun to Beijing in June, 1917. However, Zhang Xun, who was an imperialist, betrayed Li by After the resignation of Li Yuan-hong, Feng took over restoring the boy emperor, Pu Yi, to the throne and forced the duties of the Acting President on July 6, 1917 in Li to abolish the Republican Government. As a Nanjing. Then, on August 1, 1917, the inauguration consequence of the swift defeat of Zhang’s troops by a ceremony was conducted in Beijing. After that, the coalition force under the command of Duan in July, 1917, conflicts of interests between Feng and Duan were Duan re-captured Beijing and Li resigned. intensified, particularly over the issue of the unification of China which was divided between different warlords Feng Guo-zhang (Acting President: and the revolutionaries in Guangzhou / Canton. With his August 1, 1917-October 10, 1918) power base mainly in the central provinces of China, Feng advocated the peaceful unification of China by Feng Guo-zhang/Feng Kuo-chang (1859-1919) (Figure means of negotiation. On the other hand, with his power 5), like Duan Ji-rui, was originally a subordinate of Yuan bases mainly in the northern provinces, Duan, as the Shi-kai in the Beiyang Army Group back in the 1890s. Prime Minister of the Republic, ordered the forces of When the Revolution broke out in 1911, Feng and Duan the Zhili clique in the central provinces to conquer the were both key commanders in the Imperialist Army. The southern provinces. By doing so, Duan wanted to reduce victories of Feng in Hubei Province forced Dr. Sun Yat- the strengths of both the Zhili clique and southern sen to compromise with Yuan, and during Yuan’s provinces, leaving room for the expansion of the Anhui presidency, Feng became the Military Governor of clique. The takeover attempt by Duan was however Jiangsu / Kiangsu Province. Because of self-interests, neutralized by Cao Kun / Tsao Kun, a warlord of the Feng opposed Yuan’s monarchical movement. After Zhili clique, who took an uncooperative attitude towards Yuan’s death in 1916, power went to Feng and Duan Duan’s order. To retaliate, claiming that the term of five who became the Vice-President and Prime Minister years for the 1st Presidency was about to expire since respectively. When Duan consolidated his power in Yuan Shi-kai’s inauguration on October 10, 1913, Duan Beijing by building his Anhui clique among the warlords organized an election for the 2nd President in September 4 JOMSA .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Re-Evaluating the Communist Guomindang Split of 1927
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School March 2019 Nationalism and the Communists: Re-Evaluating the Communist Guomindang Split of 1927 Ryan C. Ferro University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Scholar Commons Citation Ferro, Ryan C., "Nationalism and the Communists: Re-Evaluating the Communist Guomindang Split of 1927" (2019). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7785 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nationalism and the Communists: Re-Evaluating the Communist-Guomindang Split of 1927 by Ryan C. Ferro A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-MaJor Professor: Golfo Alexopoulos, Ph.D. Co-MaJor Professor: Kees Boterbloem, Ph.D. Iwa Nawrocki, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 8, 2019 Keywords: United Front, Modern China, Revolution, Mao, Jiang Copyright © 2019, Ryan C. Ferro i Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………….…...ii Chapter One: Introduction…..…………...………………………………………………...……...1 1920s China-Historiographical Overview………………………………………...………5 China’s Long
    [Show full text]
  • 20 JOMSA Only Foreign Head of State to Receive the Award Was the Taisho Emperor of Japan
    (“Grand Merit Order”) instead of Da Bao Zhang (“Grand President Yuan on the anniversary of the Wuchang Precious Order”). Uprising but declined by Sun The sash for the sash badge (Figure 8) was Imperial • Li Yuanhong – awarded October 10, 1912 by President Yuan to Vice President Li on the anniversary of the yellow) and was worn over the left shoulder.21 The Wuchang Uprising insignia was to be worn on formal dress although it could also be worn with informal attire where required • The Taisho Emperor of Japan – awarded November for diplomacy.22 10, 1915 by President Yuan • Feng Guozhang (Figure 9) – awarded July 6, 1917 by President Li Yuanhong to Vice President Feng • Xu Shichang (Figure 10) – awarded October 10, 1918 by President Xu Shichang to himself on the anniversary of the Wuchang Uprising • Duan Qirui – awarded September 15, 1919 by President Xu Shichang to Premier Duan Qirui • Cao Kun (Figure 11)– awarded October 10, 1923 by President Cao Kun to himself on the anniversary of the Wuchang Uprising • Zhang Zuolin – awarded around 1927 by Zhang Zuolin to himself as Grand Marshal of China24 Seven were presidents (or equivalent, in the case of Zhang Zuolin). Notwithstanding the 1912 Decree, the Grand Order was also awarded to vice-presidents and premiers Figure 8: Illustration of the Republican Grand Order sash badge reverse with the name of the Order (Da Xun Zhang, 大勋章) in seal script. Compare the characters to that of the Imperial Grand Order in Figure 5 (www.gmic.co.uk). The regulations provided for the surrender or return of the insignia upon the death of the recipient, or upon conviction of criminal or other offences.23 Given the chaotic times of the early Republic, this did not necessarily occur in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comintern in China
    The Comintern in China Chair: Taylor Gosk Co-Chair: Vinayak Grover Crisis Director: Hannah Olmstead Co-Crisis Director: Payton Tysinger University of North Carolina Model United Nations Conference November 2 - 4, 2018 University of North Carolina 2 Table of Contents Letter from the Crisis Director 3 Introduction 5 Sun Yat-sen and the Kuomintang 7 The Mission of the Comintern 10 Relations between the Soviets and the Kuomintang 11 Positions 16 3 Letter from the Crisis Director Dear Delegates, Welcome to UNCMUNC X! My name is Hannah Olmstead, and I am a sophomore at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. I am double majoring in Public Policy and Economics, with a minor in Arabic Studies. I was born in the United States but was raised in China, where I graduated from high school in Chengdu. In addition to being a student, I am the Director-General of UNC’s high school Model UN conference, MUNCH. I also work as a Resident Advisor at UNC and am involved in Refugee Community Partnership here in Chapel Hill. Since I’ll be in the Crisis room with my good friend and co-director Payton Tysinger, you’ll be interacting primarily with Chair Taylor Gosk and co-chair Vinayak Grover. Taylor is a sophomore as well, and she is majoring in Public Policy and Environmental Studies. I have her to thank for teaching me that Starbucks will, in fact, fill up my thermos with their delightfully bitter coffee. When she’s not saving the environment one plastic cup at a time, you can find her working as the Secretary General of MUNCH or refereeing a whole range of athletic events here at UNC.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Palace Machine Work Palace Machine the Making
    11 ASIAN HISTORY Siebert, (eds) & Ko Chen Making the Machine Palace Work Edited by Martina Siebert, Kai Jun Chen, and Dorothy Ko Making the Palace Machine Work Mobilizing People, Objects, and Nature in the Qing Empire Making the Palace Machine Work Asian History The aim of the series is to offer a forum for writers of monographs and occasionally anthologies on Asian history. The series focuses on cultural and historical studies of politics and intellectual ideas and crosscuts the disciplines of history, political science, sociology and cultural studies. Series Editor Hans Hågerdal, Linnaeus University, Sweden Editorial Board Roger Greatrex, Lund University David Henley, Leiden University Ariel Lopez, University of the Philippines Angela Schottenhammer, University of Salzburg Deborah Sutton, Lancaster University Making the Palace Machine Work Mobilizing People, Objects, and Nature in the Qing Empire Edited by Martina Siebert, Kai Jun Chen, and Dorothy Ko Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Artful adaptation of a section of the 1750 Complete Map of Beijing of the Qianlong Era (Qianlong Beijing quantu 乾隆北京全圖) showing the Imperial Household Department by Martina Siebert based on the digital copy from the Digital Silk Road project (http://dsr.nii.ac.jp/toyobunko/II-11-D-802, vol. 8, leaf 7) Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout isbn 978 94 6372 035 9 e-isbn 978 90 4855 322 8 (pdf) doi 10.5117/9789463720359 nur 692 Creative Commons License CC BY NC ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0) The authors / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2021 Some rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, any part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise).
    [Show full text]
  • From Textual to Historical Networks: Social Relations in the Bio-Graphical Dictionary of Republican China Cécile Armand, Christian Henriot
    From Textual to Historical Networks: Social Relations in the Bio-graphical Dictionary of Republican China Cécile Armand, Christian Henriot To cite this version: Cécile Armand, Christian Henriot. From Textual to Historical Networks: Social Relations in the Bio-graphical Dictionary of Republican China. Journal of Historical Network Research, In press. halshs-03213995 HAL Id: halshs-03213995 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03213995 Submitted on 8 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ARMAND, CÉCILE HENRIOT, CHRISTIAN From Textual to Historical Net- works: Social Relations in the Bio- graphical Dictionary of Republi- can China Journal of Historical Network Research x (202x) xx-xx Keywords Biography, China, Cooccurrence; elites, NLP From Textual to Historical Networks 2 Abstract In this paper, we combine natural language processing (NLP) techniques and network analysis to do a systematic mapping of the individuals mentioned in the Biographical Dictionary of Republican China, in order to make its underlying structure explicit. We depart from previous studies in the distinction we make between the subject of a biography (bionode) and the individuals mentioned in a biography (object-node). We examine whether the bionodes form sociocentric networks based on shared attributes (provincial origin, education, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Threading on Thin Ice: Resistance and Conciliation in the Jade Marshal’S Nationalism, 1919-1939
    THREADING ON THIN ICE: RESISTANCE AND CONCILIATION IN THE JADE MARSHAL’S NATIONALISM, 1919-1939 Mengchuan Lin A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History (Modern China). Chapel Hill 2013 Approved by: Michael Tsin Miles Fletcher Klaus Larres ©2013 Mengchuan Lin ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii Abstract Mengchuan Lin: Threading On Thin Ice: Resistance and Conciliation in the Jade Marshal’s Nationalism, 1919-1939 (Under the direction of Michael Tsin) The 1920s marked a decade in the history of modern China which is typically referred to as the period of warlords. This period was characterised by political chaos, internal division and internecine warfare between various cliques of military strongmen who controlled China’s numerous provinces. These de facto military dictators of China, known as warlords in historical literature, were customarily construed to be avaricious and self-serving despots who ruled their large territories with little regard for the welfare of their subjects or that of the Chinese nation. My thesis aims to revise these previously held assumptions concerning the historical agency of Chinese warlords by investigating the unusual conduct of a particularly influential warlord: Wu Peifu. Wu’s display of deeply seated nationalistic tendencies throughout his political career, I argue, complicates our understanding of the impact that Chinese warlords exerted on the rise of Chinese national
    [Show full text]
  • How China's Censorship and Influence Affect Films Worldwide
    October 28, 2015 Directed by Hollywood, Edited by China: How China’s Censorship and Influence Affect Films Worldwide Sean O’Connor, Research Fellow, Economics and Trade and Nicholas Armstrong, Esq., Research Fellow Disclaimer: This paper is the product of professional research performed by staff of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, and was prepared at the request of the Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission’s website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.- China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 108-7. However, the public release of this document does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission, any individual Commissioner, or the Commission’s other professional staff, of the views or conclusions expressed in this staff research report. Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................3 Background ................................................................................................................................................................4 China’s Growing Film Market ...................................................................................................................................5 China’s Film Industry Development ......................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033
    Ill DEMCHUGDONGROB’S EARLY CAREER 1919-1928 The Ruling Prince of His Own Banner After the old Prince Namjilwangchug died, there was not an actual ruling prince of the Sunid Right Banner for almost seventeen years. Therefore, Demchugdongrob’s assumption of power as jasag was a momentous and happy occasion for the whole ban­ ner. It also relieved, at least ostensibly, his “ official” mother (the Turned khatun, the first wife of his father) and the elderly officials of the banner of their heavy responsibilities.' During 1919, Prince De’s first year in charge of the banner administration, a group of Buriyad Mongolian intellectuals initiated the Pan-Mongolian movement, and in late February convened a meeting of delegates from Buriyad and Inner Mongolia at Dau- ria, in Siberia. They decided to organize a government for all Mongolia and sent repre­ sentatives to the Paris Peace Conference to strive for international recognition ofMon­ golia’s independence. Because it had already established its own government. Outer Mongolia rejected the invitation, but some Inner Mongols, especially the leaders of the Hulunbuir area in the far north of Inner Mongolia, were willing to Join, and the Naiji- Toyin Khutugtu of Hohhot Turned (Inner Mongolia) was recognized as their leader. Though this movement failed to achieve its goal of recognition at the Paris con­ ference, it influenced all of Mongolia. Even though the activities of Japanese militarists and the White Russian leader, Semenov, overshadowed this movement, it still helped to rouse a common Mongolian desire for unity and independence. Although Demchugdong- rob was not involved in these matters, he was inevitably influenced by them.
    [Show full text]
  • Warlord Era” in Early Republican Chinese History
    Mutiny in Hunan: Writing and Rewriting the “Warlord Era” in Early Republican Chinese History By Jonathan Tang A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Wen-hsin Yeh, Chair Professor Peter Zinoman Professor You-tien Hsing Summer 2019 Mutiny in Hunan: Writing and Rewriting the “Warlord Era” in Early Republican Chinese History Copyright 2019 By Jonathan Tang Abstract Mutiny in Hunan: Writing and Rewriting the “Warlord Era” in Early Republican Chinese History By Jonathan Tang Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Wen-hsin Yeh, Chair This dissertation examines a 1920 mutiny in Pingjiang County, Hunan Province, as a way of challenging the dominant narrative of the early republican period of Chinese history, often called the “Warlord Era.” The mutiny precipitated a change of power from Tan Yankai, a classically trained elite of the pre-imperial era, to Zhao Hengti, who had undergone military training in Japan. Conventional histories interpret this transition as Zhao having betrayed his erstwhile superior Tan, epitomizing the rise of warlordism and the disintegration of traditional civilian administration; this dissertation challenges these claims by showing that Tan and Zhao were not enemies in 1920, and that no such betrayal occurred. These same histories also claim that local governance during this period was fundamentally broken, necessitating the revolutionary party-state of the KMT and CCP to centralize power and restore order. Though this was undeniably a period of political turmoil, with endemic low-level armed conflict, this dissertation juxtaposes unpublished material with two of the more influential histories of the era to show how this narrative has been exaggerated to serve political aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Fortifications, Modern Firepower, and Warlord Politics a Study on the Siege of Xi'an and Its Historical Significance
    /Ancient Fortifications, Modern Firepower, and Warlord Politics A Study on the Siege of Xi'an and its Historical Significance by Kingsley Tsang |fJP=!(Zeng Qingzhang) B.A., The University of British Columbia, 2000 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts . in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of History) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 2 002 © Kingsley Tsang, 2002 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of History The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date August 28, 2002 Abstract The Warlord period (1916-28) is a much-neglected era in modern Chinese scholarship. Scholars tend to ignore it because the events were complicated and the warlords acted without an ideological commitment. They are seen as violent but unsophisticated thugs with minimum affects on the history of Chinese military. The Siege of Xi'an (April to November 1926) demonstrated the fallacy of this assumption and the uniqueness of the warlord military system. The warlords managed to fuse the Chinese and Western military experience in a hybrid warring style.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Manchurian Atlas
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MANCHURIAN ATLAS: COMPETITIVE GEOPOLITICS, PLANNED INDUSTRIALIZATION, AND THE RISE OF HEAVY INDUSTRIAL STATE IN NORTHEAST CHINA, 1918-1954 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY HAI ZHAO CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2015 For My Parents, Zhao Huisheng and Li Hong ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It has been an odyssey for me. The University of Chicago has become both a source of my intellectual curiosity and a ladder I had to overcome. Fortunately, I have always enjoyed great help and support throughout the challenging journey. I cannot express enough thanks to my academic advisors—Professor Bruce Cumings, Professor Prasenjit Duara, and Professor Guy Alitto—for their dedicated teaching, inspiring guidance and continued encouragement. I have also benefited immensely, during various stages of my dissertation, from the discussions with and comments from Professor Salim Yaqub, Professor James Hevia, Professor Kenneth Pomeranz, and Professor Jacob Eyferth. Professor Dali Yang of Political Sciences and Professor Dingxin Zhao of Sociology provided valuable insights and critiques after my presentation at the East Asia Workshop. My sincere thanks also goes to Professor Shen Zhihua at the East China Normal University who initiated my historical inquiry. I am deeply indebted to my friends and colleagues without whom it would not have been possible to complete this work: Stephen Halsey, Paul Mariani, Grace Chae, Suzy Wang, Scott Relyea, Limin Teh, Nianshen Song, Covell Meyskens, Ling Zhang, Taeju Kim, Chengpang Lee, Guo Quan Seng, Geng Tian, Yang Zhang, and Noriko Yamaguchi.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Warlords Republican China During the 1920S by Matthew R
    Asia: Biographies and Personal Stories, Part I A Tale of Two Warlords Republican China During the 1920s By Matthew R. Portwood and John P. Dunn When the wind blows, the grass bends with the wind. —Yuan Shikai Soldiers of Feng Yuxiang practice with their heavy machine guns ca. 1930. Source: US Army Heritage and Educational Center. sually translated into English as “warlords,” junfa were the bane of Chinese, who suffered from their misrule, were Republican China. Some were highly trained officers, others self- all too familiar with the warlords. Sun Yat-sen, made strategists or graduates of the “school of forestry,” a Chinese Ueuphemism for banditry. In the words of a contemporary, they “did more acclaimed “Father of the Republic,” denounced harm for China in sixteen years than all the foreign gunboats could have done in a hundred years.”1 Warlords struggled for power between the death them as “a single den of badgers.” of would-be Emperor Yuan Shikai in 1916 and the end of the republic in 1949. Holdouts dominated remote frontier provinces until 1950; some of their lieutenants fought a decade later to control drug trafficking in the this in his New Yorker satire on the 1936 Xian Mutiny, in which warlord Golden Triangle. Zheng Xueliang kidnapped Guomindong leader Chiang Kai-shek: Warlords began their rise to power during the 1911 Revolution that “Young” Chang (“Old” Chang’s son, but not “Scalawag” Chang or “Red” ended millennia of imperial rule. Leaders like dentist-turned-revolution- Chang) offered to return the Generalissimo to Soong, who didn’t give a ary Sun Yat-sen argued Western-style Republicanism was the new stan- hang, but was only negotiating for his sister (who is married to Chiang).
    [Show full text]