DOCSLIB.ORG

[List of Stocks Registered on National Securities Exchanges]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
[List of Stocks Registered on National Securities Exchanges] F e d e r a l R e s e r v e Ba n k O F D A LLA S Dallas, Texas, July 29, 1953 To All Banking Institutions in the Eleventh Federal Reserve District: On June 9, 1953 we sent you a copy of Amendment No. 12 to Regulation U which is to become effective August 1, 1953. A principal provision of the amendment is that a bank loan for the purpose of purchas­ ing or carrying a “redeemable security” issued by an “ open-end company” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, whose assets customarily include stocks registered on a national securities exchange, shall be deemed under the regulation to be a loan for the purpose of purchasing or carrying a stock so registered. The amendment also provides that in determining whether or not a security is a “ redeemable security,” a bank may rely upon any reasonably current record of such securities that is published or specified in a publication of the Board of Governors. This, of course, adopts the same procedure as that specified in the regulation for determining whether or not a security is a “ stock registered on a national securities exchange,” and in the past the Board has published a “ List of Stocks Registered on National Securities Exchanges.” This list has now been revised and expanded to include also a list of “redeem­ able securities” of the type covered under the regulation by Amendment No. 12 thereto. A copy of this list dated June, 1953 and listing such stocks and securities as of March 31, 1953 is enclosed. This list supersedes the “List of Stocks Registered on National Securities Exchanges” as of January 31, 1952, which was issued in May, 1952, and the Supplementary Lists issued in August, 1952 and February, 1953. Yours very truly, R. R. GILBERT, President This publication was digitized and made available by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Historical Library ([email protected]) List of Stocks Registered on National Securities Exchanges and o f Redeemable Securities of Certain Investment Companies As of March 31, 1953 (PREPARED FOR PURPOSES OF REGULATION U) BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WASHINGTON June 1953 Foreword This list is divided into two parts: Part I— “ Stocks registered on a national securities exchange.” .............................................. p. 3 Part II— “ Redeemable securities” issued by “ open-end” investment companies whose assets customarily include stocks registered on a national securities exchange ......................... p. 35 The purpose of the list is to facilitate compliance by banks with the provisions of Regula­ tion U of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, entitled “ Loans by banks for the purpose of purchasing or carrying stocks registered on a national securities exchange.” Regulation U applies to all banks in the United States, including both members and non­ members of the Federal Reserve System. Any inquiry relating to the regulation should be addressed to the Federal Reserve Bank of the district in which the inquiry arises. Sections 3(b)(2) and 3(c) of Regulation U provide as follows: “ (2) A loan for the purpose of purchasing or carrying a ‘redeemable security’ (i.e. a redeemable proportionate interest in the issuer’s assets) issued by an ‘open-end com­ pany’, as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, whose assets customarily include stocks registered on a national securities exchange, shall be deemed to be for the purpose of purchasing or carrying a stock so registered. “ (c) In determining whether or not a security is a ‘stock registered on a national securities exchange’ or a ‘redeemable security’ described in section 3(b) (2), a bank may rely upon any reasonably current record of such securities that is published or specified in a publication of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.” A security admitted to unlisted trading privileges on a national securities exchange in accordance with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is considered, as pro­ vided by section 12 (f) of the that Act, a “security registered on a national securities exchange.” Certain other securities, however, which are listed on an exchange but which are exempted from registration, either by the Act or temporarily by the Securities and Exchange Commission, are not “ securities registered on a national securities exchange” within the meaning of the Act. This list was compiled as of March 31, 1953. Additions and changes will be indicated in supplementary lists which will be issued from time to time. Acknowledgement is made to the Securities and Exchange Commission for assistance in prep­ aration of this list. A bank may rely upon the list in determining, for the purposes of Regu­ lation U, whether or not a security is a “ stock registered on a national securities exchange,” and whether or not it is a “ redeemable security” of an “open-end” investment company whose assets customarily include stocks so registered, but the Board of Governors of the Federal Re­ serve System does not otherwise assume any responsibility for the list. Each registered stock is followed by abbreviations of the names of national securities ex­ changes on which it is listed or is admitted to unlisted trading privileges, as follows: AMS— American Stock Exchange* NYS— New York Stock Exchange BSE— Boston Stock Exchange PBS—Philadelphia-Baltimore Stock Exchange CBT— Chicago Board of Trade PIT— Pittsburgh Stock Exchange CIN— Cincinnati Stock Exchange SLS— Salt Lake Stock Exchange DSE— Detroit Stock Exchange SFM— San Francisco Mining Exchange LAS— Los Angeles Stock Exchange SFS— San Francisco Stock Exchange MSE— Midwest Stock Exchange STS— Standard Stock Exchange, Spokane NOS— New Orleans Stock Exchange WSE—Washington Stock Exchange In cases in which a registered stock is not listed on an exchange but is admitted to unlisted trading privileges thereon, the abbreviation of the name of the exchange is followed by an asterisk (*). Where the name of an issuer is not followed by the designation of any particular issue of its stock, it is the common or capital stock of the issuer. * On January 5, 1953 the name of the New York Curb Exchange was changed to the American Stock Exchange. I. LIST OF STOCKS REGISTERED ON NATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGES Allen Electric & Equipment- C o._______________ DSE Allen Industries, I n c .----------------------------------------NYS Abbott Laboratories— Alles & Fisher, Inc._____________________ BSE, AMS* Common _______________________ NYS, SFS, MSE Allied Chemical & Dye Corp.— 4% cumulative conv. preferred_NYS, MSE, SFS LAS*, NYS, BSE*, PBS*, SFS* ABC Vending Corporation __________________ AMS Allied International Investing C orp.-------------- AMS A C F-Brill Motors Company— Allied Kid Company ___________________________ NYS C om m on _____________________________________ NYS Allied Laboratories, I n c .________________________MSE W arrants for Common _____________________ AMS Allied Mills, In c._______________________________ NYS Acme Aluminum Alloys, I n c .---------------------------AMS Allied Products Corp., (M ich.) _______________ AMS Acme Mining C o. _____________________________ SFM Allied Stores Corp.— Acme Steel Company ---------------------------- NYS, MSE C om m on _______________ NYS, BSE*, PBS*, CIN* Acme Wire Company _________________________AMS* 4% cumulative p re fe rre d ____________________NYS Adam Hat Stores, Inc. -------------------------------- AMS Adams Express Company------------NYS, BSE*, PBS* Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co.— J. D. Adams Manufacturing Co_______________ MSE Common _SFS*, NYS, MSE, BSE*, PBS*, LAS* Adams-Millis Corp.---------------------------------- NYS, PBS* 3 1A% cumulative convertible preferred _____ NYS Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.---------- NYS, MSE* Alpha Portland Cement C o.____________________NYS Adm iral C o r p ._____ DSE*, NYS, MSE, BSE*, PBS* Altes Brewing C o._______________________ AMS, DSE LAS, SFS Aluminium, L td.________________________ N YS, SFS Advance Aluminum Castings Corp.----------------- MSE Aluminum Company of America— Aeco C orp ora tion ______________________________LAS C o m m o n _______________PBS*, BSE*, PIT*, NYS Aero Supply Manufacturing Co., In c. ----------AMS $3.75 cumulative preferred _________________ AMS* Aetna Ball & Roller Bearing C o .---------------------MSE Aluminum Goods Manufacturing C o . _________AMS* Affiliated Gas Equipment, Inc.— Aluminum Industries, I n c .______________CIN, AMS C om m on _______________________________MSE, NYS Amalgamated Leather Cos., Inc.— $3 cumulative p r e fe rr e d --------------------- MSE, NYS Common _______________________________NYS, PBS* Agnew Surpass Shoe Stores, Ltd. ---------------- AMS* 6% cumulative convertible p r e fe rr e d _______NYS Ainsworth Manufacturing Corp.-------- AMS*, DSE*, Amalgamated Sugar Co.— MSE C om m on _____________________________________ NYS A ir Associates, Inc., N. J. --------------------------------AMS 5% cumulative preferred _____________________ SLS* Air Reduction Company, Inc.— Ambrook Industries, In c. _____________________AMS C om m on ________________ NYS, BSE*, PBS*, SFS* Amerada Petroleum Corp.______ NYS, BSE*, PBS* 4 % % cumulative conv. preferred ---------------- NYS American Agricultural Chemical Co______NYS, BSE Airfleets, Incorporated ------------------------------------- AMS American Air Filter Company, Inc.— Airway Electric Appliance Corp.-------------------AMS 5% cumulative convertible preferred _____ AMS Ajax Petroleums, Ltd. ------------------------------------AMS American Airlines, Inc.— Akron Brass Mfg. Co., Inc.-----------------------------
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fact Sheet: Treasury Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement
    U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EMBARGOED UNTIL 11 a.m. (EDT), September 7, 2008 CONTACT Brookly McLaughlin, (202) 622-2920 FACT SHEET: TREASURY SENIOR PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac debt and mortgage backed securities outstanding today amount to about $5 trillion, and are held by central banks and investors around the world. Investors have purchased securities of these government sponsored enterprises in part because the ambiguities in their Congressional charters created a perception of government backing. These ambiguities fostered enormous growth in GSE debt outstanding, and the breadth of these holdings pose a systemic risk to our financial system. Because the U.S. government created these ambiguities, we have a responsibility to both avert and ultimately address the systemic risk now posed by the scale and breadth of the holdings of GSE debt and mortgage backed securities. To address our responsibility to support GSE debt and mortgage backed securities holders, Treasury entered into a Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with each GSE which ensures that each enterprise maintains a positive net worth. This measure adds to market stability by providing additional security to GSE debt holders – senior and subordinated-- and adds to mortgage affordability by providing additional confidence to investors in GSE mortgage-backed securities. This commitment also eliminates any mandatory triggering of receivership. These agreements are the most effective means of averting systemic risk and contain terms and conditions to protect the taxpayer. They are more efficient than a one-time equity injection, in that Treasury will use them only as needed and on terms that the Treasury deems appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquidity in the Street: a 1914 Innovation
    What Happened to Liquidity When World War I Shut the NYSE? William L. Silber Revised November 2003 The author is the Marcus Nadler Professor of Finance and Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University. He wishes to thank Yakov Amihud, Amit Arora, Menachem Brenner, Kenneth Garbade, William Greene, Joel Hasbrouck, Jane Hsu, Yang Lu, Anthony Saunders, Gideon Saar, Mitchell Stephens, Richard Sylla, Paul Wachtel, Ingo Walter, Steven Wheeler and Robert Whitelaw for helpful comments and assistance. Contact information: NYU, Stern School of Business, 44 West 4th Street, New York, N. Y. 10012. Telephone: 212- 998-0714. Email: [email protected] JEL Classifications: G1, N0, N2 Keywords: Liquidity, NYSE, World War I 1 Abstract What Happened to Liquidity When World War I Shut the NYSE? The suspension of trading on the New York Stock Exchange for more than four months following the outbreak of World War I fostered a substitute market on New Street as a source of liquidity. The New Street market suffered from impaired price transparency because its transactions were not disseminated on the NYSE ticker and its quotations were blacklisted at the leading newspapers. This paper shows that despite the incomplete information flow and the somewhat wider bid-ask spreads compared with the New York Stock Exchange, New Street offered economically meaningful liquidity services. The interference with price transparency turned an individual stock’s reputation for liquidity into an important added variable in explaining the structure of bid-ask spreads on New Street. 2 I. Introduction It is not so surprising that the outbreak of World War I forced the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to close.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing a Venture Capital Term Sheet
    Preparing a Venture Capital Term Sheet Prepared By: DB1/ 78451891.1 © Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Purpose of the Term Sheet................................................................................................. 3 II. Ensuring that the Term Sheet is Non-Binding................................................................... 3 III. Terms that Impact Economics ........................................................................................... 4 A. Type of Securities .................................................................................................. 4 B. Warrants................................................................................................................. 5 C. Amount of Investment and Capitalization ............................................................. 5 D. Price Per Share....................................................................................................... 5 E. Dividends ............................................................................................................... 6 F. Rights Upon Liquidation........................................................................................ 7 G. Redemption or Repurchase Rights......................................................................... 8 H. Reimbursement of Investor Expenses.................................................................... 8 I. Vesting of Founder Shares..................................................................................... 8 J. Employee
    [Show full text]
  • Operating and Capital Improvement Budget July 1, 2018 - Jurte 30, 2019 Fiscal Year 2019
    Operating and Capital Improvement Budget July 1, 2018 - Jurte 30, 2019 Fiscal Year 2019 PortAuthority.o rg This page intentionally left blank Board of Directors Officers Jeffrey W. Letwin, Esq., Chairperson of the Board of Directors Jennifer M. Liptak, Vice Chairperson of the Board of Directors Senator Jim Brewster, Secretary of the Board of Directors Directors Representative Dom Costa Robert J. Kania, Jr. Ann Ogoreuc D. Raja John L. Tague, Jr. Stephanie Turman Robert Vescio Michelle Zmijanac 2 | P a g e Chief Executive Officer Katharine Eagan Kelleman Officers and Assistant General Managers Barry Adams, Chief Human Resources Officer Michael Cetra, Chief Legal Officer Jeffrey Devlin, Chief Information Officer David Huffaker, Chief Development Officer William Miller, Chief Operations Officer James Ritchie, Chief Communications Officer Peter Schenk, Chief Financial Officer Heinz 57 Center 345 Sixth Avenue Floor 3 Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2327 (412) 566-5500 www.portauthority.org 3 | P a g e FY 2019 Operating and Capital Table of Contents Improvement Budget Board of Directors ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Officers and Assistant General Managers ..................................................................................................... 3 Regional and Port Authority Profile .............................................................................................................. 6 Allegheny County .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STARRETT-LEHIGH BUILDING, 601-625 West 26Th Street, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission October 7, 1986; Designation List 186 LP-1295 STARRETT-LEHIGH BUILDING, 601-625 west 26th Street, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1930-31; Russell G. and Walter M. Cory, architects; Yasuo Matsui, associate architect; Purdy & Henderson, consulting engineers. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 672, Lot 1. On April 13, 1982, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Starrett-Lehigh Building, and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 20). The hearing was continued to June 8, 1982 (Item No. 3). Both hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Four witnesses spoke in favor of designation, and a letter supporting designation was read into the record. Two representatives of the owner spoke at the hearings and took no position regarding the proposed designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Starrett-Lehigh Building, constructed in 1930-31 by architects Russell G. and walter M. Cory with Yasuo Matsui as associate architect and Purdy & Henderson as consulting engineers, is an enormous warehouse building that occupies the entire block bounded by West 26th and 27th Streets and 11th and 12th Avenues. A cooperative venture of the Starrett Investing Corporation and the Lehigh Valley Railroad, and built by Starrett Brothers & Eken, the structure served originally as a freight terminal for the railroad with rental manufacturing and warehouse space above. A structurally complex feat of engineering with an innovative interior arrangement, the Starrett-Lehigh Building is also notable for its exterior design of horizontal ribbon windows alternating with brick and concrete spandrels.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Preferred Stock
    FIXED INCOME 101 CONTRIBUTOR Jason Giordano U.S. Preferred Stock Director Fixed Income Indices Preferred stock is a hybrid security that reflects characteristics of both [email protected] stocks and bonds. Typically, the dividends paid by preferred shares generate higher yields than common stock and investment-grade corporate bonds (see Exhibit 1). Therefore, preferred shares could serve 1 as a potential source of significant current income. In addition, their relatively low correlations with traditional asset classes, such as common stocks and bonds, may provide potential portfolio-diversification and risk- reduction benefits. In Exhibit 1, the highlighted period from June 2014 to June 2016 reflects the turmoil in the high-yield markets and interest rate hike during that time. Note the interest rate sensitivity (similar to debt) and volatility (similar to equity) of the S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index (TR). Exhibit 1: Relative Performance Versus Corporate Bonds (2014-2016) Typically, the dividends paid by preferred shares generate higher yields than common stock and investment-grade corporate bonds. Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. Data from June 2014 to June 2016. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Chart is provided for illustrative purposes and reflects hypothetical historical performance. Please see the Performance Disclosure at the end of this document for more information regarding the inherent limitations associated with back-tested performance. In low-interest-rate environments with narrow credit spreads, preferred stocks behave similarly to bonds. In periods of high volatility, they behave more like stocks. When used as a complement to traditional fixed income asset classes, preferred securities may provide an opportunity for enhanced total return, while potentially reducing overall volatility.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Preferred Stock: Basic Concepts
    Cooperative Preferred Stock: Basic Concepts Preferred stock offerings are sometimes used by cooperatives to meet their capitalization needs. In contrast to other types of cooperative stock, preferred stock: • may be sold to member and non-members, which expands the potential number of equity investors; • offers dividends and other preferential terms to its shareholders. Preferred stock, however, may not be appropriate for every situation in which a cooperative is raising equity. Some basic information about cooperative stock and securities is essential when considering the possibility of offering preferred stock.1 STOCK BASICS One tool that a business can use to raise money for start-up or growth is to sell shares of stock in their businesses. The shareholder, by purchasing the stock, has made an equity investment that is “at risk,” with no guarantee of a return. In return for the equity investment, stock gives shareholders certain ownership rights that are laid out in the terms associated with the stock. The terms define voting and redemption rights and requirements, and any claims on earnings. The stockholder’s ownership control is exercised through the level of voting rights associated with the share of stock. A shareholder’s number of votes increases with the number of shares owned. The terms are set by the business that issues the stock. The “class” of a stock – class A, class B, etc. – is a label assigned by the business to stock shares that are issued with the same purpose and general set of terms. The class name by itself has no stand-alone legal meaning. Stocks are securities, which are legally defined as a monetary investment made in an enterprise with the expectation of a profit from the efforts of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Liquidity in Emerging Market Exchanges
    ENHANCING LIQUIDITY IN EMERGING MARKET EXCHANGES ENHANCING LIQUIDITY IN EMERGING MARKET EXCHANGES OLIVER WYMAN | WORLD FEDERATION OF EXCHANGES 1 CONTENTS 1 2 THE IMPORTANCE OF EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GROWING LIQUIDITY page 2 page 5 3 PROMOTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A DIVERSE INVESTOR BASE page 10 AUTHORS Daniela Peterhoff, Partner Siobhan Cleary Head of Market Infrastructure Practice Head of Research & Public Policy [email protected] [email protected] Paul Calvey, Partner Stefano Alderighi Market Infrastructure Practice Senior Economist-Researcher [email protected] [email protected] Quinton Goddard, Principal Market Infrastructure Practice [email protected] 4 5 INCREASING THE INVESTING IN THE POOL OF SECURITIES CREATION OF AN AND ASSOCIATED ENABLING MARKET FINANCIAL PRODUCTS ENVIRONMENT page 18 page 28 6 SUMMARY page 36 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Trading venue liquidity is the fundamental enabler of the rapid and fair exchange of securities and derivatives contracts between capital market participants. Liquidity enables investors and issuers to meet their requirements in capital markets, be it an investment, financing, or hedging, as well as reducing investment costs and the cost of capital. Through this, liquidity has a lasting and positive impact on economies. While liquidity across many products remains high in developed markets, many emerging markets suffer from significantly low levels of trading venue liquidity, effectively placing a constraint on economic and market development. We believe that exchanges, regulators, and capital market participants can take action to grow liquidity, improve the efficiency of trading, and better service issuers and investors in their markets. The indirect benefits to emerging market economies could be significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted Department of Architecture August 10, 2018
    Transactional Terrains: Partnerships, Bargains and the Postwar Redefinition of the Public Realm, New York City 1965-1980 by Deepa Ramaswamy M.A, Architectural Association School of Architecture, 2010 M. Arch., Virginia Tech, 2005 Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture: History and Theory of Architecture at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2018 D 2018 Deepa Ramaswamy. All rights reserved. C= w The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part C in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signatu ARCHIVES Author:re of Signature redacted Department of Architecture August 10, 2018 Certified Signature redacted by: Arindam Dutta Associate Professor of the History of Architecture, Dissertation Supervisor Accepted Signature redacted by: Sheila Kennedy Chair, Deptment Committee on Graduate Studies I Committee Members Chair Arindam Dutta Associate Professor of the History of Architecture, Dissertation Supervisor Readers Mark Jarzombek Professor of the History and Theory of Architecture Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reader Timothy Hyde Associate Professor of the History of Architecture Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Felicity Scott Professor of Architecture Graduate School of Architecture and Planning Columbia University 3 4 Transactional Terrains: Partnerships, Bargains and the Postwar Redefinition of the Public Realm, New York City 1965-1980 by Deepa Ramaswamy Submitted to the Department of Architecture on August 23,2018 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture: History and Theory of Architecture Abstract This dissertation traces the architectural and urban history of the privatization of the public realm.
    [Show full text]
  • Century Economy for Baltimore 4
    Banking for a Baltimore Undivided Confronting Race and Class to Increase Opportunity and Equity for People and Neighborhoods For too long, Baltimore’s people and communities have had little or no say in the direction of the government or how tax dollars are spent. They do not determine how their communities are developed, and so they have watched as government has gone into debt to fund the development of downtown areas - while neglecting the very real needs of neighborhoods throughout the rest of the city. The Baltimore uprising of 2015 brought long festering problems to the forefront and showed that Baltimore needs transformational change - not tinkering with the status quo. The investment strategies and policies for the past 60 years are no longer relevant or feasible. A Joshua Harris Administration is ready to enact enabling legislation to fund investment strategies that make sense in 21st century Baltimore. This plan, based upon successful urban policies from throughout the United States and the world, will empower the residents of Baltimore to decide the future direction of their city. I recognize the community economic challenges facing Baltimore will not be fixed by the next Mayor alone, but by a Mayor who authentically involves community in every strata of a community economic development vision. It will be fixed by the people, first at the neighborhood level and then as a united city, working together for a better future. As Mayor, we will work to ensure the full participation of our residents in creating a united 21st century city. The plan will shift power from City Hall, big developers and Wall Street to people, neighborhoods and communities - because the people who are most affected by Baltimore’s problems are the ones who have the solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) Performance Report This Page Is Intentionally Blank to Allow for Duplex Printing
    PAAC System Performance Review November 23, 2016 Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) Performance Report This page is intentionally blank to allow for duplex printing. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits ..................................................................................................... ii Agency Public Transportation Profile ................................................................ iii Fixed-Route Service.................................................................................................................................. iii Paratransit Service ..................................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary .............................................................................................. v Agency Description ................................................................................................................................... v Act 44 Performance Determination...................................................................................................... vii General Findings ....................................................................................................................................... ix Financial Review ....................................................................................................................................... xi Five-Year Performance Targets ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1938
    Fourth Annual Report of the Securities and Exchange Commission Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1938 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1938 For lIII1eby the Superintendent of Documents. Washington. D. C. - - - - - - - - Price III ceJlts SECURITms AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION omoe: 1778 P8lUlSYlvllllla A.venue NW. Washlngton, D. O. COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM O. DOUGLAS, Chairman GEORGE C. MATHEWS ROBERT E. HEALY JEROME N. FRANK JOHN W. HANES 1 FRANCIS P. BRASSOR, Secretary Address All Communications SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. I Resigned June 30, 1938. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Washington, January 3, 1939. SIR: I have the honor to transmit to you the Fourth Annual Report of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in compliance with the provisions of Section 23 (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, approved June 6, 1934, and Section 23 of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, approved August 26, 1935. Respectfully, WILLIAM O. DOUGLAS, Ohairman. The PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, The SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Washington, D. O. m CONTENTS Introduction _ P... 1 Registration of Public Utility Holding Companies .. _ 6 Orders Granting Exemptions from Registration under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 _ 8 Reorganization, Simplification, and Integration of Registered Public Util- ity Holding Companies and Subsidiaries _ 9 Rules, Regulations, and Forms under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 _ 13 Issuance of Securities by Registered Holding
    [Show full text]