Esmaile A. SHAKMAN* and Ragnar KINZELBACH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Esmaile A. SHAKMAN* and Ragnar KINZELBACH ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2007) 37 (1): 7–15 DISTRIBUTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF LESSEPSIAN MIGRANT FISHES ALONG THE COAST OF LIBYA * Esmaile A. SHAKMAN and Ragnar KINZELBACH Allgemeine und Spezielle Zoologie, Universität Rostock, Germany Shakman E.A., Kinzelbach R. 2007. Distribution and characterization of Lessepsian migrant fishes along . the coast of Libya. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 37 (1): 7–15 Background. The Lessepsian migrant ichthyofauna along the approximately 2000 km of the Libyan coastline has been poorly known. A comprehensive study, addressing this issue, was needed and therefore the presently reported research project is intended to close the gap, through identifying the fish species and assessing their dis - tribution. Materials and Methods. The catches of commercial fisheries vessels were monitored and examined in a stan - dardized procedure between January 2005 and March 2006. The project covered a total of 4273 specimens, com - prising 1901 specimens of Siganus luridus , 1885 specimens of Siganus rivulatus , and 487 specimens of fourteen other Lessepsian fish species. Results. Sixteen Lessepsian fish species, representing 14 families, were recently found along the Libyan coast, two of which are considered to be first records for Libya: Herklotsichthys punctatus (Rüppell, 1837) and Liza carinata (Valenciennes, 1836). Approximately 50% of the immigrants were found along the entire stretch of the Libyan coast, 12.5% in the east and central regions, and 37.5% were restricted to the eastern part of the Libyan coast. All were found in the coastal area (1–50 m depth), 12.5% on the vegetation, 31.25% on sandy bottoms, 12.5% on rocks, while the majority of them (43.75%) were pelagic. Regarding the size, 75% were medium, 18.75% large, and 6.25% were categorized as small. Conclusions. The north African coast (west of the Nile delta)—compared with the Levantine- and Anatolian coast of the Mediterranean Sea—was considered to be settled by immigrants from the Red Sea with some delay, due to sea currents. If so, this situation has changed meanwhile at least for fishes. More than 37% of the record - ed Lessepsian fish species are of commercial value, especially rabbitfish ( Siganus spp.). The future research should be focussed on monitoring the stocks, especially of the commercially valuable species, regarding the biol - ogy and ecology of the Lessepsian migrants. Also, possible further additions to the fish fauna, by new invaders, . should be recorded Keywords: biogeography, bioinvasions, Libya, Lessepsian migration, marine fish INTRODUCTION of species, which have passed from the Mediterranean The term “Lessepsian migration” was coined by Por into the Red Sea; these are named anti-Lessepsian (1978) for the migration of organisms from the Red Sea migrants (Por 1978). into the eastern Mediterranean through the Suez Canal. The fish fauna of the Mediterranean has already Many species, which were able to adapt rapidly to the new undergone considerable change, as can be illustrated by environment, spread into the Mediterranean and estab - the following selected case studies. Papaconstantinou lished new populations. Information on the comparative (1990) reported that 11 species had reached the Aegean life histories of the immigrants is necessary (a) for an Islands (Dodecanese, Cyclades) through swimming along understanding of the selective mechanisms controlling the the coast of Anatolia. Twenty-two Lessepsian fish species passage through the Suez Canal, (b) for an assessment of live on the coasts of the eastern Mediterranean- and the adaptive changes of the newly established “neopopu - Aegean seas, with some of them becoming commercially lations”, and (c) for an evaluation of the extensive ecolog - important ( Torcu and Mater 2000). In 2002, thirty-three ical changes which invading species may produce in their Lessepsian fish species were documented on the new areas of distribution (Ben-Tuvia 1978). The number Anatolian coast (Bilecenoglu and Taşkavak 2002). For the of Lessepsian migrant species exceeds by far the number Egyptian coast, several authors have recorded Lessepsian * Correspondence: , Mr. Esmaile A. Shakman, Allgemeine und Spezielle Zoologie, Universität Rostock, Universitätsplatz 2, D-18055 Rostock, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 8 and Shakman Kinzelbach fish species ( Ben -T uvia 1976, El-Sayed 1994). Two forsskali (Fourmanoir et Guézé, 1976); and Indian scad, Lessepsian fish species were recorded in Italy: Siganus Decapterus russelli (Rüppell, 1830) (cf. Bilecenoglu and luridus (Rüppell, 1829) appeared along the shallow Kaya 2006, Çinar et al. 2006, Corsini et al. 2006, Golani waters of the Pelagic Islands (Azzurro and Andaloro 2006, Golani and Sonin 2006). 2004), whilst Fistularia commersonii Rüppell, 1838 was Although it is clear that migrant Lessepsian fish recorded on the eastern coast of Lampedusa ( Azzurro et species have had an enormous impact on the eastern al. 2004) . Ktari and Boualal (1971) reported S. luridus for Mediterranean ecosystem, there has been no thorough the first time on the Tunisian coast. In 1974, S. luridus and study to assess this impact (Golani 2002). Many S. rivulatus Forsskål 1775 were recorded for the first time Lessepsian fish species have been recorded in Libyan in the Gulf of Gabes ( Ktari and Ktari 1974). After that, six waters (Stirn 1970, Zupanovic and El-Buni 1982, Indo-Pacific fish species were recorded in Tunisian waters Al-Hassan and El-Silini 1999, Ben-Abdallah et al. 2005, as newcomers ( Parexocoetus mento (Valenciennes, 1847); Shakman and Kinzelbach 2006, Shakman and Kinzelbach Pempheris vanicolensis Cuvier, 1831; Stephanolepis 2007). There is no comprehensive study of the Lessepsian diaspros Fraser-Brunner, 1940 ; S. luridus ; S. rivulatus ; marine species in this area, particularly of the fish species, and Priacanthus hamrur (Forsskål 1775) ) ( Bradai et al. and so the objectives of this paper are to present the dis - 2004). The bluespotted cornetfish, F. commersonii , was tribution and characterization of fish species along the also recorded along the Tunisian coast ( Ben-Souissi et al. almost 2000 km of Libyan coast and a general contribu - 2004). In the Adriatic Sea, Sphyraena pinguis Günther, tion to knowledge of exotic marine fish species in the 1874 was recorded in 2001 (Pallaoro and Dulčić 2001), Mediterranean Sea. and afterwards S. rivulatus was recorded for the first time in the same area ( Dulcic and Pallaoro 2004). The silver - MATERIALS AND METHODS stripe blaasop, Lagocephalus sceleratus (Gmelin, 1789), This study was carried out on samples collected has become an abundant species in the eastern between January 2005 and March 2006 along the Libyan Mediterranean, immediately after its first record (Akyol et coast at the depths of 1–50 m. The pelagic and benthic sam - al. 2005, Bilecenoglu et al. 2006). More recently, the fol - ples were collected with a trammel net (inner mesh 26 mm, lowing alien species were included to Mediterranean outer mesh 120 mm). The study area was divided to three ichthyofauna; Japanese threadfin bream, Nemipterus main regions according to topography and environment japonicus (Bloch, 1791); teira batfish, Platax teira (east region, Sirt Gulf, west region). Two sites were (Forsskål, 1775); peacock wrasse, Iniistius pavo selected in the east region (Tubruk, Benghazi), one site in (Valenciennes, 1840); Red Sea goatfish, Parupeneus the Sirt Gulf (Musrata), and two sites in the west region Fig. 1. Map of the Libyan coast, showing cities adjacent to the sampling sites 9 Lessepsian migrant fishes in Libya 80 70 60 e 50 g a t n 40 e c r 30 e P 20 10 0 l l l l n c e e y y m a n i a a i r i o g k d u o g c r i i a c c m n r t r a r m a d l o s l n a e a e r e t e m s o m e p m o m n g c m m e o o v c C Abundance Size Habitat Commercial value Characterization Fig. 2. Characterization of Lessepsian fish species along the Libyan coast 60 50 40 e g a t n e 30 c r e P 20 10 0 Along Libyan coast East and Sirt gulf East region Distribution Fig. 3. Distribution of Lessepsian fish species along the Libyan coast East region 100 90 Sirt region 80 West region e 70 g a 60 t n 50 e c r 40 e P 30 20 10 0 r i s s s a r u u ta i ii a n s s s s f o s d t a u n b o ro i u tu . p n ri la s g o a s p m s a H . e u u in s d r s a o t id lu v t p r je e a u n c U n . ri b . e d i q u n e S . o m . m d s c u r . S m . o la p c S S m A o S d . o c n H C c . u A . S . F S Fig. 4. The distribution in percentage of each Lessepsian fish species along the Libyan coast e e a y a e d l e e i e d i a a a i a e e h e d e d d h m a i a a d i i p t e a e t i a e e d d d n n a r n a e d i a a n i i e m F i e e e r a r a d d a d d o a n i a a i g c a i i h b i d r l d r r d l e i i r i a n i n n p l y y o u e r m p a l g n a a t m r h h n a h m o u u u o g g s e t l a i i p p y i p e c S S S S C H S F A C M S P M M S y l a l k a i u r h e s e p b o a m m b g a I a r r n A h a g u f s f a a n o f s l o i a r l l t M a A h y u a i e f a l l b S n i i a i a H a S , s a z z z r , L 1 a , a y h h l d a m r 0 w l r g g a r G h a a a h a a s s O h a , f f a Y l a e , s d h a K h r M M a a a e s n t A e o , , M s a e K b e o a a d b u y u s t t r a a a l m o f a t t a o u m l h h k - n t r r i o a a s s a e k o d r e m l t t l a u m e o o i a b a a a a a u a r r a p a B B M M S M A G N S T S S B B H ) Table 1 h s ) List of Lessepsiat n fish species of the Libyan coast fi ) l ) e l h e h e l r s s d u e i fi fi s k ) e m e r r l c e i e e a fi y m ( g v p e a l r m r e t
Recommended publications
  • Prioritized Species for Mariculture in India
    Prioritized Species for Mariculture in India Compiled & Edited by Ritesh Ranjan Muktha M Shubhadeep Ghosh A Gopalakrishnan G Gopakumar Imelda Joseph ICAR - Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Post Box No. 1603, Ernakulam North P.O. Kochi – 682 018, Kerala, India www.cmfri.org.in 2017 Prioritized Species for Mariculture in India Published by: Dr. A Gopalakrishnan Director ICAR - Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Post Box No. 1603, Ernakulam North P.O. Kochi – 682 018, Kerala, India www.cmfri.org.in Email: [email protected] Tel. No.: +91-0484-2394867 Fax No.: +91-0484-2394909 Designed at G.K. Print House Pvt. Ltd. Rednam Gardens Visakhapatnam- 530002, Andhra Pradesh Cell: +91 9848196095, www.gkprinthouse.com Cover page design: Abhilash P. R., CMFRI, Kochi Illustrations: David K. M., CMFRI, Kochi Publication, Production & Co-ordination: Library & Documentation Centre, CMFRI Printed on: November 2017 ISBN 978-93-82263-14-2 © 2017 ICAR - Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi All rights reserved. Material contained in this publication may not be reproduced in any form without the permission of the publisher. Citation : Ranjan, R., Muktha, M., Ghosh, S., Gopalakrishnan, A., Gopakumar, G. and Joseph, I. (Eds.). 2017. Prioritized Species for Mariculture in India. ICAR-CMFRI, Kochi. 450 pp. CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................................. i Preface .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Platax Teira (Forsskål, 1775) Frequent Synonyms / Misidentifications: None / Platax Orbicularis (Non Forsskål, 1775)
    click for previous page Perciformes: Acanthuroidei: Ephippidae 3619 Platax teira (Forsskål, 1775) Frequent synonyms / misidentifications: None / Platax orbicularis (non Forsskål, 1775). FAO names: En - Spotbelly batfish. 34 cm standard length 25 cm standard length Diagnostic characters: Body orbicular and strongly compressed, its depth more than twice length of head and 0.9 to 1.2 times in standard length. Head length 2.7 to 3.5 times in standard length. Large adults (above 35 cm standard length) with bony hump from top of head to interorbital region, the front head profile almost vertical; interorbital width 42 to 50% head length. Jaws with bands of slender, flattened, tricuspid teeth, the middle cusp slightly longer than lateral cusps; vomer with a few teeth, but none on palatines. Five pores on each side of lower jaw. Preopercle smooth; opercle without 20 cm 12 cm 9.4 cm spines. Dorsal fin single, with V or VI spines standard length standard length standard length and 29 to 34 soft rays, the spines hidden in front margin of fin, the last spine longest; anal fin with III spines and 21 to 26 soft rays; juveniles with pelvic fins and anterior soft rays of dorsal and anal fins elongated, but pelvic fins not reaching much past vertical at rear end of anal-fin base; pectoral fins shorter than head, with 16 to 18 rays; caudal fin truncate. Scales small and rough. Lateral line complete, with 56 to 66 scales. Colour: yellowish silvery or dusky, with a black (or dusky) bar through eye and another dark bar from dorsal-fin origin across rear edge of operculum and pectoral-fin base to belly, where it usually encloses a black blotch, with another smaller black vertical streak often present at origin of anal fin; median fins dusky yellow, with black margins posteriorly; pelvic fins yellow, dusky yellow or blackish.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Technical Meeting on the Lessepsian Migration and Its Impact
    EastMed TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS 04 REPORT OF THE TECHNICAL MEETING ON THE LESSEPSIAN MIGRATION AND ITS IMPACT ON EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN FISHERY NICOSIA, CYPRUS 7 - 9 DECEMBER 2010 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS REPORT OF THE TECHNICAL MEETING ON THE LESSEPSIAN MIGRATION AND ITS IMPACT ON EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN FISHERY NICOSIA, CYPRUS 7 - 9 DECEMBER 2010 Hellenic Ministry of Foreign Affairs ITALIAN MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND FORESTRY POLICIES Hellenic Ministry of Rural Development and Food GCP/INT/041/EC – GRE – ITA Athens (Greece), 7-9 December 2010 i The conclusions and recommendations given in this and in other documents in the Scientific and Institutional Cooperation to Support Responsible Fisheries in the Eastern Mediterranean series are those considered appropriate at the time of preparation. They may be modified in the light of further knowledge gained in subsequent stages of the Project. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of FAO or donors concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the determination of its frontiers or boundaries. ii Preface The Project “Scientific and Institutional Cooperation to Support Responsible Fisheries in the Eastern Mediterranean- EastMed is executed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and funded by Greece, Italy and EC. The Eastern Mediterranean countries have for long lacked a cooperation framework as created for other areas of the Mediterranean, namely the FAO sub-regional projects AdriaMed, MedSudMed, CopeMed II and ArtFiMed. This fact leaded for some countries to be sidelined, where international and regional cooperation for fishery research and management is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Fishes of the Gulf of Mannar Ecosystem, Tamil Nadu, India
    Available online at: www.mbai.org.in doi: 10.6024/jmbai.2016.58.1.1895-05 Check list of fishes of the Gulf of Mannar ecosystem, Tamil Nadu, India K. K. Joshi*, Miriam Paul Sreeram, P. U. Zacharia, E. M. Abdussamad, Molly Varghese, O. M. M. J. Mohammed Habeeb1, K. Jayabalan1, K. P. Kanthan1, K. Kannan1, K. M. Sreekumar, Gimy George and M. S. Varsha ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, P. B. No.1603, Kochi - 682 018, Kerala, India. 1Tuticorin Research Centre of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Tuticorin - 628 001, Tamil Nadu, India. *Correspondence e-mail: [email protected] Received: 10 Jan 2016, Accepted: 25 Jun 2016, Published: 30 Jun 2016 Original Article Abstract Introduction Gulf of Mannar Ecosystem (GOME) covers an area spread over Rameswaram and Kanyakumari for about 19000 km2 and lies between India is blessed with a vast region of coral reefs and 78°11’E and 79°15’ E longitude and 8°49’N and 9°15’N latitude. The mangroves and these regions support very rich fauna of flora 21 coral islands form a network of habitats for different kinds of fishes and constitute rich biodiversity of marine organisms. Gulf and marine organisms. Fish samples were collected during April 2005 of Mannar Ecosystem (GOME) covers an area spread over to March 2010 from different centers viz., Vembar, Tharuvaikulam, Rameswaram and Kanyakumari to about 19,000 km2. GOME Vellapatti, Therespuram, Tuticorin, Alangarathattu, Pazhaykayal, lies between 78°11’00” E and 79°15’00” E longitude and Punnakayal, Kayalpattinam, Veerapandiapattinam, Thiruchendur and 8°49’00” N and 9°15’00” N latitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Online First Article Comparison of Body Height
    Pakistan J. Zool., pp 1-7, 2021. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20191113021130 Comparison of Body Height, Body Length, Full Length and Body Weight Growth Curves of the Longfin Batfish, Platax teira Chen Zeng1,2, Baosuo Liu1,4, Kecheng Zhu1,4, Liang Guo1,2, Huayang Guo1,4, Nan Zhang1,4, Quan Yang1,3, Jing Wen Yang1,4 and Dianchang Zhang1,4* 1Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, 510300, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China 2 College of Fisheries, Tianjin Agricultural University, 300392, Tianjin, China Article Information 3National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Received 13 November 2019 Revised 24 December 2019 Shanghai Ocean University, 201306, Shanghai, China Accepted 08 January 2020 4Guangdong Provincial Engineer Technology Research Center of Marine Biological Available online 08 July 2020 Seed Industry, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China Authors’ Contribution CZ, BL and DZ conceived and designed the experiments. CZ, QY and ABSTRACT BL performed the experiments. CZ, HG, NZ, LG and JWY collected the samples. CZ analyzed the data and To study the growth and development rules of the longfin batfish Platax teira, three nonlinear models, wrote the paper. CZ, QY, KZ and DZ logistic, Gompertz and Bertalanffy, were used in the study to fit and analyse the body height, body length, assisted in writing and proofreading. full length and body weight growth curves of the fish at the age of 2-8 months. The results showed that the three nonlinear curves could fit the body height, body length, full length and body weight growth curves Key words of the P.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Two Species of Fishes from West Bengal, India and Additional New Ichthyofaunal Records for the Indian Sundarbans
    International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 2020; 8(2): 06-10 E-ISSN: 2347-5129 P-ISSN: 2394-0506 (ICV-Poland) Impact Value: 5.62 First record of two species of fishes from West Bengal, (GIF) Impact Factor: 0.549 IJFAS 2020; 8(2): 06-10 India and additional new ichthyofaunal records for the © 2020 IJFAS www.fisheriesjournal.com Indian Sundarbans Received: 04-01-2020 Accepted: 08-02-2020 Priyankar Chakraborty, Kranti Yardi, Prasun Mukherjee and Priyankar Chakraborty Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Subhankar Das Environment Education and Research (BVIEER), Bharati Abstract Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) Five species of fishes viz., Ichthyscopus lebeck, Lagocephalus spadiceus, Platax teira, Caesio University, Pune, Maharashtra, caerulaurea and Thysanophrys celebica are recorded from the Indian Sundarbans, the deltaic bulge of the India Ganges River in the State of West Bengal, India. Thysanophrys celebica and Lagocephalus spadiceus forms the first record for the state of West Bengal, India. Diagnostic characteristics and notes on Yardi Kranti distribution are provided in this paper. The present paper subsidises the already existing list of Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of ichthyofaunal resources from the Indian Sundarbans region to provide a better understanding of the role Environment Education and Research (BVIEER), Bharati of different species in the functioning of the ecosystem. Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, Pune, Maharashtra, Keywords: Taxonomy, biodiversity, distribution, ichthyology, mangroves, first record India 1. Introduction Prasun Mukherjee The Sundarban mangrove forests comprise about 2114 sq.km of forest cover in the state of School of Water Resources [1] Engineering, Jadavpur West Bengal, India which is about half the total estimate for mangroves of coastal India .
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Fish Parasitic Isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda) from the Gulf of Thailand
    animals Article New Records of Fish Parasitic Isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda) from the Gulf of Thailand Watchariya Purivirojkul * and Apiruedee Songsuk Animal Systematics and Ecology Speciality Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 November 2020; Accepted: 2 December 2020; Published: 4 December 2020 Simple Summary: Parasitic isopods were reported found from marine fishes from many habitat in the world. In Thailand, there is not much study on this parasitic group. This work has compiled all published parasitic isopods documents in Thailand from year 1950 to present include collecting samples from the Gulf of Thailand during the period 2006–2019. New host records were found from four species of parasitic isopods (Cymothoa eremita, Smenispa irregularis, Nerocila sundaica, Norileca triangulata) and two species of parasitic isopods (Argathona macronema, Norileca triangulata) were found first time in the central Indo-Pacific region. Abstract: From a total of 4140 marine fishes examined, eight species of parasitic isopods were reported from marine fishes in the Gulf of Thailand. These isopods were identified in two families, Corallanidae (Argathona macronema and Argathona rhinoceros) and Cymothoidae (Cymothoa eremita, Cymothoa elegans, Smenispa irregularis, Nerocila sundaica, Norileca indica and Norileca triangulata). Most of these parasitic isopods were found in the buccal cavity of their fish hosts with one host recorded as follows: C. eremita was found from Nemipterus hexodon, C. elegans was found from Scatophagus argus, N. sundaica was found from Saurida tumbil. The majority of the isopod specimens recorded in this study was S.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Atlantic Spadefish Chaetodipterus Faber (Broussonet, 1782) in the Mediterranean Sea: Is It a New Aquarium Release?
    BioInvasions Records (2020) Volume 9, Issue 1: 89–95 CORRECTED PROOF Rapid Communication First record of the Atlantic spadefish Chaetodipterus faber (Broussonet, 1782) in the Mediterranean Sea: is it a new aquarium release? Ioannis Giovos1,*, Francesco Tiralongo2,3, Joachim Langeneck4, Alexander Kaminas1, Periklis Kleitou1,5, Fabio Crocetta6 and Nikos Doumpas1 1iSea, Environmental Organization for the Preservation of the Aquatic Ecosystems, Thessaloniki, Greece 2Ente Fauna Marina Mediterranean, Scientific Organization for Research and Conservation of Marine Biodiversity, Avola, Italy 3Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Science, University of Catania, Catania, Italy 4Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy 5Marine and Environmental Research (MER) Lab Ltd., Limassol, Cyprus 6Department of Integrative Marine Ecology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, I-80121 Napoli, Italy Author e-mails: [email protected] (IG), [email protected] (FT), [email protected] (JL), [email protected] (AK), [email protected] (PK), [email protected] (FC), [email protected] (ND) *Corresponding author Citation: Giovos I, Tiralongo F, Langeneck J, Kaminas A, Kleitou P, Abstract Crocetta F, Doumpas N (2020) First record of the Atlantic spadefish Chaetodipterus The Atlantic spadefish Chaetodipterus faber (Broussonet, 1782) belongs to the faber (Broussonet, 1782) in the family Ephippidae Bleeker, 1859 and is a widely distributed species in the Western Mediterranean Sea: is it a new aquarium Atlantic. In this work we present the record of a single specimen of C. faber release? BioInvasions Records 9(1): 89–95, captured by a professional fisher in Argosaronikos Gulf, Greece. The present https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2020.9.1.12 sighting, reported through the citizen science project “Is it Alien to you? Share it!!!”, Received: 14 November 2019 constitutes the first record of this species in the Mediterranean Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Coral Fish Fauna of Xisha Islands, China
    Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e63945 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e63945 Taxonomic Paper Checklist of the coral fish fauna of Xisha Islands, China Shuting Qiu‡, Bin Chen ‡,§, Jianguo Du‡,§, Kar-Hoe Loh |, Jianji Liao‡¶, Xinming Liu , Wen Yang‡ ‡ Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen, China § Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory ofMarine Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Xiamen, China | Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia ¶ Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Guangxi, China Corresponding author: Jianguo Du ([email protected]) Academic editor: Yahui Zhao Received: 04 Feb 2021 | Accepted: 01 Mar 2021 | Published: 08 Mar 2021 Citation: Qiu S, Chen B, Du J, Loh K-H, Liao J, Liu X, Yang W (2021) Checklist of the coral fish fauna of Xisha Islands, China. Biodiversity Data Journal 9: e63945. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.9.e63945 Abstract Background The Xisha Islands are composed of the Yongle Islands and the Xuande Islands in Hainan Province, China. It has one of the highest species diversity in the world and is also a typical oceanic distribution area of coral reefs globally. The ichthyofauna of the Xisha Islands were recorded by underwater visual census in May 2019 and July 2020. The survey data were combined with previous records of species into the checklist of the Xisha Islands presented herein. A total of 691 species, belonging to 24 orders and 97 families, was recorded. The major families were Labridae, Pomacentridae, Serranidae, Chaetodontidae, Hexanchidae, Lutjanidae, Scaridae, Gobiidae, Scorpaenidae and Carangidae. In this study, the Coral Fish iversity Index (CFDI) of six families (Chaetodontidae, Pomacanthidae, Pomacentridae, Labridae, Scaridae and Acanthuridae) was 229, indicating 756 coral fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Size Structure and Reproductive Status of Exploited Reef-Fish Populations at Kamiali Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea
    Size Structure and Reproductive Status of Exploited Reef-Fish Populations at Kamiali Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea Ken Longenecker, Ross Langston, Holly Bolick, and Utula Kondio Honolulu, Hawaii November 2012 COVER Eight-year-old John Giamsa (center), helps Ross Langston (left), prepare histological sections of fish gonads for rapid reproductive analysis. Size Structure and Reproductive Status of Exploited Reef-Fish Populations at Kamiali Wildlife Management Area, Papua New Guinea Ken Longenecker1, Ross Langston1, Holly Bolick1, and Utula Kondio2 (1) Pacific Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawaii 96817, USA (2) Kamiali Wildlife Management Area Lababia, Morobe Province, PNG Bishop Museum Technical Report 59 Honolulu, Hawaii November 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright © 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012-016 to the Pacific Biological Survey Contents List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 6 List of Figures................................................................................................................................. 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 10 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 12
    [Show full text]
  • GENUS Chaetodipterus Lacepede, 1802 [=Chaetodipterus Lacepède [B
    FAMILY Ephippidae Bleeker, 1859 – spadefishes GENUS Chaetodipterus Lacepede, 1802 [=Chaetodipterus Lacepède [B. G. E.] 1802:503, Parephippus Gill [T. N.] 1861:165] Notes: [Histoire naturelle des poissons (Lacepéde) v. 4; ref. 4929] Masc. Chaetodon plumieri Bloch 1787. Type by monotypy. Chetodipterus Rafinesque 1815:83 [ref. 3584] an incorrect subsequent spelling. •Valid as Chaetodipterus Lacepède 1802 -- (Matsuura in Uyeno et al. 1983:385 [ref. 14275], Johnson 1984:465 [ref. 9681], Desoutter 1986:340 [ref. 6212], Castro-Aguirre et al. 1999:455 [ref. 24550], Burgess 2003:1799 [ref. 27101]). Current status: Valid as Chaetodipterus Lacepède 1802. Ephippidae. (Parephippus) [Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia v. 13; ref. 1775] Masc. Ephippus gigas Cuvier 1829. Type by original designation. •Synonym of Chaetodipterus Lacepède 1802 -- (Desoutter 1986:340 [ref. 6212] but with wrong type). Current status: Synonym of Chaetodipterus Lacepède 1802. Ephippidae. Species Chaetodipterus faber (Broussonet, 1782) [=Chaetodon faber Broussonet [P. M. A.] 1782:[27], Pl. [6], Ephippus gigas Cuvier [G.] 1829:191, Chaetodon oviformis Mitchill [S. L.] 1818:247, Chaetodon plumieri Bloch [M. E.] 1787:104, Pl. 211 (fig. 1), Selene quadrangularis Lacepède [B. G. E.] 1802:561, 564, Zeus quadratus Bonnaterre [J. P.] 1788:72, Zeus quadratus Gmelin [J. F.] 1789:1225] Notes: [Ichthyologia, sistens piscium descriptiones et icones. Decas I.; ref. 17287] Jamaica. Mus. Banks (apparently lost). Current status: Valid as Chaetodipterus faber (Broussonet 1782). Ephippidae. Distribution: Western Atlantic. Habitat: freshwater, brackish, marine. (gigas) [Le Règne Animal (Edition 2) v. 2; ref. 995] America. Current status: Synonym of Chaetodipterus faber (Broussonet 1782). Ephippidae. Habitat: brackish, marine. (oviformis) [American Monthly Magazine and Critical Review v.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Species on the Coasts of Turkey
    Mediterranean Marine Science Volume 6/2, 2005, 119-146 Alien species on the coasts of Turkey M. e. ÇiNAR1, M. bileceNoĞlu2, b. ÖztÜRK1, T. KATAGAN1 and V. AYSel3 1.Ege University, Faculty of Fisheries, Department of Hydrobiology, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey 2.Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Arts & Sciences, Department of Biology, 09010 Aydin, Turkey 3.Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Arts & Sciences, Department of Biology, Çanakkale, Turkey e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The compilation of data on alien species reported from the Turkish coasts yielded a total of 263 species belonging to 11 systematic groups, of which Mollusca had the highest number of species (85 species), followed by Crustacea (51), fishes (43) and phytobenthos (39). The Black Sea is represented by a total of 20 alien species, the Sea of Marmara by 48 species, the Aegean Sea by 98 species and the Levantine Sea by 202 species. The majority of aliens found in the Black Sea and the Sea of Marmara were transported via shipping, whereas the Levantine coast is extensively subjected to Lessepsian migration. Benthic habitats (soft and hard substrata) comprise 76% of the total alien species and the pelagic environment is inhabited by thirty-nine species. Almost 50% of aliens collected from the Turkish coasts were found only at 0-10 m depth. Eight species occur at depths deeper than 100 m. The impacts of aliens on the benthic and pelagic ecosytems are presented. Keywords: Alien species; Species list; Impact; Black Sea; Sea of Marmara; Aegean Sea; Levantine Sea; Turkey. Intoduction capable of colonizing every ecosystem on earth, changing the ecological relations within com- Species introduction is one of the major munities, altering evolutionary processes and factors adversely affecting biological diversity causing dramatic changes in native populations, (ELTON, 1958).
    [Show full text]