ISSN 0100-7203 RBGO eISSN 1806-9339 Gynecology & Obstetrics
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia Number 2 • Volume 43 • Pages 81–154 • February 2021 ISSN 0100-7203
RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Editor in Chief
Marcos Felipe Silva de Sá Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Former Editors
Jean Claude Nahoum Sérgio Pereira da Cunha Rio de Janeiro, RJ (1979–1989) Ribeirão Preto, SP (1994–1997) Clarice do Amaral Ferreira Jurandyr Moreira de Andrade Rio de Janeiro, RJ (1989–1994) Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil (1997–2015)
Associated Editors
Agnaldo Lopes da Silva Filho Fabrício da Silva Costa Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Monash University, Melbourne, Universidade de São Paulo, Campinas, SP, Brazil Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil Victoria, Australia Marcos Nakamura Pereira Alessandra Cristina Marcolin Fernanda Garanhani de Castro Surita Instituto Fernandes Figueira, Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Campinas, SP, Brazil Maria Celeste Osório Wender Ana Katherine da Silveira Gonçalves Fernando Marcos dos Reis Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil Maria Laura Costa do Nascimento Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Andréa da Rocha Tristão Gabriel Costa Osanan Campinas, SP, Brazil Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Melânia Maria Ramos de Amorim “Júlio de Mesquite Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil Angélica Nogueira Rodrigues Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Gustavo Salata Romão Campina Grande, PB, Brazil Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto, Mila de Moura Behar Pontremoli Salcedo Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde Antonio Rodrigues Braga Neto Helena von Eye Corleta de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Omero Benedicto Poli Neto Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Conrado Milani Coutinho Ilza Maria Urbano Monteiro SP, Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Patrícia El Beitune Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Campinas, SP, Brazil Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde Corintio Mariani Neto João Paulo Souza de Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Paula Andrea de Albuquerque Salles Navarro São Paulo, SP, Brazil SP, Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Cristina Laguna Benetti Pinto José Carlos Peraçoli Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Renato Moretti-Marques Campinas, SP, Brazil Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Daniel Guimarães Tiezzi José Geraldo Lopes Ramos São Paulo, SP, Brazil Universidade de São Paulo,Ribeirão Preto, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Ricardo Carvalho Cavalli Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Diama Bhadra Andrade Peixoto do Vale José Guilherme Cecatti Ricardo Mello Marinho Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Universidade de São Paulo, Campinas, SP, Brazil Faculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Campinas, SP, Brazil José Maria Soares Júnior Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil Eddie Fernando Candido Murta Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Rosana Maria dos Reis Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Julio Cesar Rosa e Silva Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Uberaba, MG, Brazil Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil SP, Brazil Edward Araujo Júnior Lucia Alves da Silva Lara Rosiane Mattar Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil SP, Brazil São Paulo, SP, Brazil Elaine Christine Dantas Moisés Lucia Helena Simões da Costa Paiva Rodrigo de Aquino Castro Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Campinas, SP, Brazil São Paulo, SP, Brazil Eliana Aguiar Petri Nahas Luiz Carlos Zeferino Silvana Maria Quintana Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Universidade de São Paulo, “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil Campinas, SP, Brazil Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Editorial Board
Sophie Françoise Mauricette Derchain Iracema de Mattos Paranhos Calderon Newton Sergio de Carvalho Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do Paraná, Campinas, SP, Brazil “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil Curitiba, PR, Brazil Alex Sandro Rolland de Souza João Luiz Pinto e Silva Nuno Henrique Malhoa Migueis Clode Instituto de Medicina Integral Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisboa, Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil Campinas, SP, Brazil Portugal Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa e Silva João Paulo Dias de Souza Olímpio Barbosa Moraes Filho Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil PE, Brazil Aurélio Antônio Ribeiro da Costa João Sabino Lahorgue da Cunha Filho Paulo Roberto Nassar de Carvalho Universidade de Pernambuco, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Instituto Fernandes Figueira-Fiocruz, Recife, PE, Brazil Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Belmiro Gonçalves Pereira José Carlos Peraçoli Renato Augusto Moreira de Sá Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal Fluminense, Campinas, SP, Brazil “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, SP, Brazil Niterói, RJ, Brazil Carlos Augusto Alencar Junior José Juvenal Linhares Rintaro Mori Universidade Federal do Ceará, Universidade Federal do Ceará, National Center for Child Health Fortaleza, CE, Brazil Campus de Sobral, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil and Development, Tokyo, Japan Carlos Grandi Joshua Vogel Roberto Eduardo Bittar Universidad de Buenos Aires, Department of Reproductive Health and Universidade de São Paulo, Buenos Aires, Argentina Research, World Health Organization, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Cesar Cabello dos Santos Geneva, Switzerland Rosane Ribeiro Figueiredo Alves Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Juvenal Soares Dias-da-Costa Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Campinas, SP, Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, GO, Brazil Délio Marques Conde Pelotas, RS, Brazil Roseli Mieko Yamamoto Nomura Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Hospital Materno Infantil de Goiânia, Laudelino Marques Lopes São Paulo, SP, Brazil Goiânia, GO, Brazil University of Western Ontario, Rossana Pulcinelli Vieira Francisco Dick Oepkes London, Ontario, Canada Universidade de São Paulo, University of Leiden, Leiden, Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza São Paulo, SP, Brazil The Netherlands Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Ruff o de Freitas Junior Dino Roberto Soares de Lorenzi São Paulo, SP, Brazil Universidade Federal de Goiás, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Luis Otávio Zanatta Sarian Goiânia, GO, Brazil Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Sabas Carlos Vieira Diogo de Matos Graça Ayres de Campos Campinas, SP, Brazil Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler PI, Brazil Eduardo Pandolfi Passos Instituto Nacional do Câncer, Sebastião Freitas de Medeiros Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Luiz Henrique Gebrim Cuiabá, MT, Brazil Edmund Chada Baracat Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Selmo Geber Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Manoel J. B. Castello Girão, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil Eliana Martorano Amaral Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Silvia Daher Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Campinas, SP, Brazil Marcelo Zugaib São Paulo, SP, Brazil Francisco Edson Lucena Feitosa Universidade de São Paulo, Shaun Patrick Brennecke Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, São Paulo, SP, Brazil University of Melbourne Parkville, CE, Brazil Marcos Desidério Ricci Victoria, Australia George Condous Universidade de São Paulo, Técia Maria de Oliveira Maranhão Nepean Hospital in West Sydney, Sidney, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Australia Maria de Lourdes Brizot Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil Giuseppe Rizzo Universidade de São Paulo, Toshiyuki Hata Università degli Studi di Roma São Paulo, SP, Brazil University Graduate School of Medicine, “Tor Vergata”, Roma, Italy Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge Kagawa, Japan Gutemberg Leão de Almeida Filho Universidade Estadual Paulista Wellington de Paula Martins Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Universidade de São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Botucatu, SP, Brazil Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Editorial Offi ce
Bruno Henrique Sena Ferreira
Editorial Production
Thieme Medical Publishers ISSN 0100-7203
Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations
Society Board (2020–2024) Presidency and Executive Staff
President Av. Brigadeiro Luís Antônio, 3421 - Sala 903 - Agnaldo Lopes da Silva Filho (MG) Jardim Paulista, São Paulo, SP, Brazil CEP: 01401-001 Administrative Director Phone.: (+55 11) 5573-4919 Sérgio Podgaec (SP) www.febrasgo.org.br Scientifi c Director [email protected] César Eduardo Fernandes (SP) Financial Director RBGO Editorial Offi ce Olímpio B. de Moraes Filho (PE) Professional Status Defence editorial.offi [email protected] Maria Celeste Osório Wender (RS) Vice-president of North Region Ricardo de Almeida Quintairos (PA) Vice-president of Northeast Region Carlos Augusto Pires C. Lino (BA) Vice-president of Middle West Region Marta Franco Finotti (GO) Vice-president of Southeast Region Marcelo Zugaib (SP) Vice-president of South Region Almir Antônio Urbanetz (PR) Volume 43, Number 2/2021 RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Editorial
81 We have Vaccine for COVID-19! What to Recommend for Pregnant Women? Silvana Maria Quintana
Original Articles
Obstetrics
84 Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section according to the Robson Classifi cation Groups Karina Biaggio Soares, Vanessa Cristina Grolli Klein, José Antônio Reis Ferreira de Lima, Lucas Gadenz, Larissa Emile Paulo, and Cristine Kolling Konopka
91 Factors Associated with Exclusive Breastfeeding in a Maternity Hospital Reference in Humanized Birth Gabriela Pinheiro Brandt, Alan Messala A. Britto, Camila Carla De Paula Leite, and Luciana Garangau Marin
High Risk Pregnancy
97 Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Maria Carolina Wensing Herdt, Flávio Ricardo Liberal Magajewski, Andressa Linzmeyer, Rafaela Rodolfo Tomazzoni, Nicole Pereira Domingues, and Milla Pereira Domingues
107 Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity are Related to Persistent Hyperglycemia in the Postpartum Period Patricia Moretti Rehder, Anderson Borovac-Pinheiro, Raquel Oliveira Mena Barreto de Araujo, Juliana Alves Pereira Matiuck Diniz, Nathalia Lonardoni Crozatti Ferreira, Ana Claudia Rolim Branco, Aline de Fatima Dias, and Belmiro Gonçalves Pereira
113 Risk Factors for Postpartum Hemorrhage and its Severe Forms with Blood Loss Evaluated Objectively – A Prospective Cohort Study Anderson Borovac-Pinheiro, Filipe Moraes Ribeiro, and Rodolfo Carvalho Pacagnella
Basic And Translational Science /Endometriosis
119 Follicular Fluid from Infertile Women with Mild Endometriosis Impairs In Vitro Bovine Embryo Development: Potential Role of Oxidative Stress Vanessa Silvestre Innocenti Giorgi, Rui Alberto Ferriani, and Paula Andrea Navarro
Menopause
126 The Eff ectiveness of Melissa Offi cinalis L. versus Citalopram on Quality of Life of Menopausal Women with Sleep Disorder: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial Mahboobeh Shirazi, Mohamad Naser Jalalian, Masoumeh Abed, and Marjan Ghaemi
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda online www.thieme-connect.com/products RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics Volume 43, Number 2/2021
Urogynecology
131 Eff ect of Preoperative Urodynamic Study on Urinary Outcomes after Transobturator Sling Pedro Rincon Cintra da Cruz, Aderivaldo Cabral Dias Filho, Gabriel Nardi Furtado, Rhaniellen Silva Ferreira, and Ceres Nunes Resende
Oncology
137 Malignant Uterine Neoplasms Attended at a Brazilian Regional Hospital: 16-years Profi le and Time Elapsed for Diagnosis and Treatment Elaine Cristina Candido, Nelio Neves Veiga Junior, Monique Possari Minari, Maria Carolina Szymanski Toledo, Daniela Angerame Yela, and Julio Cesar Teixeira
Case Report
145 Transmediastinal Gunshot Wound in a Pregnant Patient with Stable Hemodynamics Ozhan Ozdemır and Cemal Resat Atalay
Letter to the Editor
148 Management of Ectopic Pregnancy and the COVID-19 Pandemic Rujittika Mungmunpuntipantip and Viroj Wiwanitkit
Febrasgo Statement
150 Vaccination in women with cancer Nilma Antas Neves, Júlio César Teixeira, André Luis Ferreira Santos, Fabíola Zoppas Fridman, and Cecília Maria Roteli-Martins
Complementary material is available online at www.rbgo.org.br.
Cover design: © Thieme Cover image source: © Thieme
© 2021. Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights Revista Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia is an official publication of the reserved. RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics/Revista Brasileiro de Ginecologia e Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (Brazilian Obstetrícia is published monthly by Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda., Rua Federation of Association of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Febrasgo), It is do Matoso, 170, Rio de Janeiro 20270-135, Brazil. listed in Isi - Web of Science, Web of Knowledge (Emerging), MEDLINE / Editorial comments should be sent to [email protected]. Articles may PubMed, Index Medicus, Scopus (Sci Verse), SCImago, SciELO (Scientific be submitted to this journal on an open-access basis. For further informa- Electronic Library Online), LILACS (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe tion, please send an e-mail to [email protected]. The content of this em Ciências da Saúde, Index Medicus Latino Americano), and Portal de journal is available online at www.thieme-connect.com/products. Visit our Periódicos Capes (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Web site at www.thieme.com and the direct link to this journal at www. Superior). Thieme Medical Publishers is a member of the CrossRef initiative. rbgo.com.br. ISSN 0100-7203
Some of the product names, patents, and registered designs referred to in this medical knowledge, neither the authors, editors, or publisher, nor any other publication are in fact registered trade marks or proprietary names even though party who has been involved in the preparation of this work, warrants that specifi c reference to this fact is not always made in the text. Therefore, the the information contained here in is in every respect accurate or complete, appearance of a name without designation as proprietary is not to be construed and they are not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results as a representation by the Publisher that it is in the public domain. obtained from use of such information. Because of rapid advances in the All rights, including the rights of publication, distribution, and sales, as well medical sciences, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages as the right to translation, are reserved. No part of this work covered by the should be made. Readers are encouraged to confirm the information con- copyrights hereon may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means— tained herein with other sources. For example, readers are advised to check graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or the product information sheet included in the package of each drug they information and retrieval systems—without written permission of the Publisher. plan to administer to be certain that the information contained in this publi- Important Note: Medical knowledge is ever-changing. As new research cation is accurate and that changes have not been made in the recommended and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and dose or in the contraindications for administration. This recommendation is drug therapy may be required. The authors and editors of the material here- of particular importance in connection with new or infrequently used drugs. in have consulted sources believed to be reliable in their efforts to provide Although all advertising material is expected to conform to ethical information that is complete and in accord with the standards accepted at (medical) standards, inclusion in this journal does not constitute a guar- the time of publication. However, in view of the possibility of human er- antee or endorsement of the quality or value of such product or of claims ror by the authors, editors, or publisher of the work herein, or changes in made by its manufacturer. THIEME Editorial 81
Editorial We have Vaccine for COVID-19! What to Recommend for Pregnant Women? Silvana Maria Quintana1
1 Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2021;43(2):81–83.
On January 17, 2021, two vaccines were approved by ANVISA quality that protect against 22 diseases, in addition to for emergency use to help combat COVID-19: Coronavac and other immunobiologicals. Covishield/Oxford. The first vaccine is composed of inacti- Vaccines are substances that aim to induce specificim- vated (killed) viruses, was produced by the Chinese company munity by preventing invasion or eliminating pathogens Sinovac and in Brazil, will be produced by the Butantã circulating in the host or neutralizing microbial toxins, but Institute (São Paulo). The second is an adenovirus non- without causing disease in the recipient. It is very important replicating viral vector vaccine and was produced by the to know the composition of vaccines, especially to indicate pharmaceutical company Serum Institute of India in part- their use in the pregnancy-puerperal cycle. Vaccines con- nership with AstraZeneca/Oxford University. In Brazil, it will taining live (attenuated or modified) or inactivated (killed) be produced by the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio antigen are considered safe techniques and have been known de Janeiro. for more than 80 years. Recently, thanks to the evolution of In view of the worrying and prolonged scenario of the scientific research, subunit or recombinant vaccines, vac- COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential that Brazilian scientific cines using viral vectors, replicating or non-replicating, and societies share scientific knowledge free of political ideolo- nucleic acid vaccines such as messenger RNA (mRNA) have gies with their peers and position themselves based on the been developed. available evidence in relation to vaccines against COVID-19. Vaccines prepared with attenuated antigens contain the In this context, gynecologists and obstetricians have living but weakened form of the antigen, promoting a robust requested guidelines on the indication of these vaccines in immune response with a prolonged duration, sometimes for pregnant, puerperal and nursing women. I will highlight the rest of life. The main representatives of this group are some points I consider important to support my opinion with BCG, chickenpox, rubella, mumps, measles and yellow fever. which I will conclude this editorial. As a general rule, they are not recommended during preg- Vaccines occupy a prominent position among the pil- nancy. Inactivated vaccines consist of dead antigens after lars of public health and allow both the eradication of their exposure to chemical and physical agents and induce a diseases such as smallpox, and a significant reduction in less lasting immune response, requiring more doses to diseases such as polio, rubella, tetanus and whooping induce prolonged protection. Vaccines for influenza (flu), cough,whichusedtobecommoninthepast.1 Two hepatitis A and rabies stand out in this group. All vaccines in programs offered by the Brazilian Ministry of Health to this group can be used by pregnant women, but influenza the population through the National Health Service (Bra- vaccines are expressly recommended during pregnancy and zilian SUS) should be a reason for pride for all Brazilians: the postpartum period.2 Toxoid vaccines contain inactivated the STI/AIDS program and the National Immunization bacterial toxin and lead to weak immunization with need for Program, active since 1973. The National Immunization a booster dose after a few years, such as tetanus and Program of the Ministry of Health offers free of charge to diphtheria vaccines, both recommended during the preg- the Brazilian population a set of vaccines of excellent nancy-puerperal cycle. Recombinant vaccines are produced
Address for correspondence © 2021. Federação Brasileira de DOI https://doi.org/ Silvana Maria Quintana, Av. Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights 10.1055/s-0041-1726090. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14049-900, reserved. ISSN 0100-7203. Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil This is an open access article published by (e-mail: [email protected]). Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/) Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda., Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil 82 Editorial
by genetic engineering techniques in which other agents are from the obstetric point of view, higher rates of preterm birth – programmed to produce the desired antigenic fraction by and operative deliveries were observed.3 5 In Brazil, data stimulating a very effective immune response. Vaccines released by the Ministry of Health showed that SARS CoV-2 against hepatitis B and acellular pertussis are recombinant infection was the main cause of severe acute respiratory and recommended for application during pregnancy and the syndrome (SARS) in pregnant women in the third trimester puerperal period. Viral vector vaccines insert a modified and the mortality rate, especially in cases of concomitant virus protein into another genetically weakened virus that is comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension and obesity, unable to replicate in the human body. When this vaccine is was alarmingly high. According to a study by FIOCRUZ and a injected into the body, the immune system promotes an group of Brazilian researchers, Brazil is the country with the immune response to this protein that was hidden within the highest number of deaths by COVID-19 in women in the vector, leading to the production of antibodies and other pregnancy-puerperal cycle in the world.6,7 Therefore, national defense cells capable of protecting the individual. Finally, and international data available so far allow to state that nucleic acid vaccines such as messenger RNA (mRNA) contain women during the pregnancy-puerperal cycle are part of a molecule with the SARS CoV-2 genetic code with instruc- the group at higher risk for complications from COVID-19, tions for cytoplasm ribosomes to initiate the synthesis of maternal death and unfavorable obstetric outcomes. In view of specific proteins of the surface of this virus. When these these results, in January 2021, the Ministryof Health released a proteins are exposed to the immune system, they will be technical standard8 recommending the withdrawal of preg- identified as an antigen, thereby triggering the immune nant and postpartum women from face-to-face work given the response with the production of antibodies. There are still important risks of COVID-19 to their health, reaffirming that no controlled studies on the use of these vaccines in pregnant they are a risk group for this infection. women. The National Immunization Program of the Ministry Throughout these 11 months of the pandemic, the world of Health recommends that pregnant women routinely population has been experiencing a major health crisis. We receive three vaccines to protect against five diseases: Hep- are facing a serious epidemiological situation with no pros- atitis B, DPT (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus) and influenza. If pect of a short-term resolution. When women in the preg- needed, other vaccination schedules should be individual- nancy-puerperal cycle acquire SARS CoV-2 infection, they ized and discussed with the pregnant/puerperal woman. are at a higher risk for progressing to severe conditions and After the authorization for emergency use of vaccines for death, and this is even more relevant if they have comorbid- COVID-19 by ANVISA, at this time for priority groups such as ities. The medications used to treat severe cases of this health professionals, it is natural to question whether we infection have not been tested for efficacy and safety in should/can recommend these vaccines for women in the this group of women. In view of this scenario, the arrival pregnancy-puerperal cycle and/or breastfeeding their chil- of vaccines against COVID-19 brought hope of controlling the dren. Although the published clinical trials on vaccines against situation, but given the lack of information on efficacy and COVID-19 indicate safety and efficacy in the populations safety in pregnant and puerperal women, doubts arise evaluated, there is no data on the immunogenicity, efficacy regarding its recommendation. In this context, International or safety of these vaccines in women in the pregnancy- Societies such as the American College of Obstetrics and puerperal cycle, as no clinical trial for these vaccines included Gynecology (ACOG),9 the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine this population. However, I emphasize that the Coronavac (SMFM)10 and the Royal College11 mentioned the need to vaccine contains inactivated (killed) viruses, a technique include pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials, and with proven safety during the pregnancy-puerperal cycle for recommended that vaccines against COVID-19 should not be several years. In addition, the official package insert of this denied to this group of women, especially if they are health vaccine classifies the product as class B for use during preg- professionals or have comorbidities. Note that the mRNA nancy, that is, there are no studies in pregnant women, but vaccine was the type released in these countries. In Brazil, studies in animals have not shown fetal damage. The other the FEBRASGO Vaccine Commission12 released a note that vaccine approved in Brazil, Covishield is a recombinant vaccine pregnant and lactating women belonging to the risk group that uses chimpanzee adenovirus non-replicating viral vector may receive the vaccine after assessing the risks and benefits technology. Although it is a relatively recent technique, in in a decision shared between the woman and her doctor. theory, the vaccine is safe for use during pregnancy. Considering the increase in maternal morbidity and mor- Pregnant women experience important adaptations of tality associated with COVID-19 and previous experience their organism to provide adequate nutrition and oxygenation with inactivated (killed) virus vaccines demonstrating the to the fetus, thus their predisposition to viral infections during safety and efficacy of these immunobiologicals in pregnant this period. Studies comparing the behavior of COVID-19 in women, the concern to indicate this vaccine due to the lack of pregnant women with non-pregnant women showed that data on efficacy and safety is not a justification for denying pregnant women who acquired SARS CoV-2 and developed the vaccine to pregnant and puerperal women, especially symptoms of the infection were at a higher risk for: requiring those working as health professionals or who have comor- hospitalization; developing severe conditions with admission bidities. In fact, this group should be considered a priority to to intensive care units (ICU); progressing to respiratory failure receive vaccines against COVID-19. and requiring invasive ventilation (orotracheal intubation); Obviously, information about the lack of data on efficacy and and consequently, were at greater risk of death. In addition, safety, and about the performance of vaccines against COVID-19
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. Editorial 83 in populations already studied should be clearly exposed to study of the impact of influenza during pregnancy among women pregnant and puerperal women. The pregnant-puerperal wom- in middle-income countries. Reprod Health. 2018;15(01):159. an’s decision to be vaccinated must be taken after receiving this Doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0600-x 3 Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, Yap M, Chatterjee S, Kew T, et al; for information and considering the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection PregCOV-19 Living Systematic Review Consortium. Clinical man- for pregnant women, their individual risk for COVID-19 infec- ifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of tion and progression to serious illness (comorbidities, active coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review health professional), and the vaccine safety. After these consid- and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;370:m3320. Doi: 10.1136/bmj. erations, if the pregnant woman decides not to be vaccinated, m3320 her decision must be respected. The health professional must 4 Zambrano LD, Ellington S, Strid P, Galang RR, Oduyebo T, Tong VT, et al; CDC COVID-19 Response Pregnancy and Infant Linked address the issue of vaccination in the prenatal consultation, Outcomes Team. Update: characteristics of symptomatic women including the vaccine against COVID-19 in addition to all of reproductive age with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in- vaccines recommended during pregnancy and the puerperal fection by pregnancy status - United States, January 22-October 3, period, expose evidence-based information, assess the pregnant 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(44):1641–1647. woman’s risk and respect the woman’s decision. Doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6944e3 5 Di Mascio D, Sen C, Saccone G, Galindo A, Grünebaum A, Yoshi- For puerperal and lactating women, who were also ex- matsu J, et al. Risk factors associated with adverse fetal outcomes cluded from clinical trials, there are no data on the excretion in pregnancies affected by Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): of this substance in breast milk, but obviously, if puerperal a secondary analysis of the WAPM study on COVID-19. J Perinat women infected with SARS CoV-2 are allowed to breastfeed, Med. 2020;49(01):111–115. Doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0539 that is, if the disease is compatible with breastfeeding, 6 Nakamura-Pereira M, Betina Andreucci C, de Oliveira Menezes M, vaccination should be directed at these women.13 Knobel R, Takemoto MLS. Worldwide maternal deaths due to COVID-19: A brief review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;151(01): Finally, it is a fact that pregnant women are at a higher risk 148–150. Doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13328 of progressing to severe COVID-19 and that being a health 7 Takemoto MLS, Menezes MO, Andreucci CB, Nakamura&Pereira professional or having comorbidities such as diabetes, obe- M, Amorim MMR, Katz L, et al. The tragedy of COVID-19 in Brazil: sity, hypertension can add risk to the lives of these women. In 124 maternal deaths and counting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; addition, a significant number of pregnant women will 151(01):154–156. Doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13300 potentially be eligible to receive the vaccine against 8 do Trabalho MPProcuradoria Geral do Trabalho Nota Técnica 01/2021 do GT Nacional COVID-19. Nota Técnica sobre a proteção COVID-19 before the development of clinical trials to define à saúde e igualdade de oportunidades no trabalho para trabalha- fi ef cacy and safety. We could lose many lives unless we adopt doras gestantes em face da segunda onda da pandemia do COVID a more pragmatic position. I argue that pregnant women 19 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 12]. Available from: https:// who have comorbidities or continue working as health www.conjur.com.br/dl/nota-tecnica-gestante1.pdf professionals should be part of the priority group to receive 9 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vacci- the vaccine against COVID-19. The final decision whether or nating pregnant and lactating patients against covid-19 [Inter- net]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 27]. Available from: https://www. not to receive the vaccine will be made by the woman after acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/ receiving the appropriate information. This same principle 2020/12/vaccinating-pregnant-and-lactating-patients-against- applies with even greater emphasis to puerperal and lactat- covid-19 ing women. Regardless of the decision to vaccinate, antenatal 10 Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Society for Maternal-Fetal care must be maintained and all pregnant women should Medicine (SMFM) Statement: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in preg- nancy [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 27]. Available from: receive guidance on infection prevention with emphasis on https://s3.amazonaws.com/cdn.smfm.org/media/2591/ hand hygiene, social distance and wearing a mask. SMFM_Vaccine_Statement_12-1-20_(final).pdf 11 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Updated ad- Conflicts to Interest vice on COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy and women who are None to declare. breastfeeding [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/updated-advice-on-covid-19- vaccination-in-pregnancy-and-women-who-are-breastfeeding/ References 12 Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia 1 Guimarães R. Anti-Covid vaccines: a look from the Collective (FEBRASGO) Importância da vacinação materna [Internet]. 2020 Health. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25(09):3579–3585. Doi: [cited 2020 Dec 21]. Available from: https://www.febrasgo.org.- 10.1590/1413-81232020259.24542020 br/pt/campanhas/campanha-gestante-consciente/item/1130- 2 Dawood FS, Hunt D, Patel A, Kittikraisak W, Tinoco Y, Kurhe K, importancia-da-vacinacao-materna et al; Pregnancy and Influenza Multinational Epidemiologic 13 COVID-19 vaccine [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 12]. (PRIME) Study Working Groupà The Pregnancy and Influenza Available from: http://www.e-lactancia.org/breastfeeding/covid- Multinational Epidemiologic (PRIME) study: a prospective cohort 19-vaccine/product/
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. THIEME 84 Original Article
Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section according to the Robson Classification Groups Risco gestacional como fator determinante para cesariana de acordo com os grupos da Classificação Robson Karina Biaggio Soares1 Vanessa Cristina Grolli Klein1 José Antônio Reis Ferreira de Lima1 Lucas Gadenz1 Larissa Emile Paulo1 Cristine Kolling Konopka1
1 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universidade Federal de Address for correspondence Cristine Kolling Konopka, MD, PhD, Av. Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil Roraima, 1000, Cidade Universitária, Camobi, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil (e-mail: [email protected]). Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2021;43(2):84–90.
Abstract Objective To analyze and compare the frequency of cesarean sections and vaginal deliveries through the Robson Classification in pregnant women attended at a tertiary hospital in two different periods. Methods Cross-sectional, retrospective study of birth records, comprising 4,010 women, conducted from January 2014 to December 2015 in the only public regional referral hospital for the care of high- risk pregnancies, located in Southern Brazil. Results The overall cesarean section rate reached 57.5% and the main indication was the existence of a previous uterine cesarean scar. Based on the Robson Classification, Keywords groups 5 (26.3%) and 10 (17.4%) were the most frequent ones. In 2015, there was a ► pregnancy significant increase in the frequency of groups 1 and 3 (p < 0.001), when compared ► high-risk pregnancy with the previous year, resulting in an increase in the number of vaginal deliveries ► parturition (p < 0.0001) and a reduction in cesarean section rates. ► cesarean section Conclusion The Robson Classification proved to be a useful tool to identify the profile ► robson classification of parturients and the groups with the highest risk of cesarean sections in different periods in the same service. Thus, it allows monitoring in a dynamic way the indications and delivery routes and developing actions to reduce cesarean rates according to the characteristics of the pregnant women attended.
Resumo Objetivo Analisar e comparar a frequência de partos cesáreos e vaginais através da classificação de Robson em gestantes atendidas em um hospital terciário em dois períodos distintos. Métodos Estudo transversal retrospectivo de registros de nascimento, compreen- dendo 4.010 mulheres, realizado de janeiro de 2014 a dezembro de 2015 no único hospital público de referência regional para atendimento de gestações de alto risco, localizado no sul do Brasil. A via de parto foi avaliada e as mulheres foram classificadas de acordo com a Classificação de Robson.
received DOI https://doi.org/ © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e January 8, 2020 10.1055/s-0040-1718446. Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. accepted ISSN 0100-7203. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the August 13, 2020 Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, published online distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. January 19, 2021 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda., Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section Soares et al. 85
Resultados A taxa geral de cesariana foi de 57,5% e a principal indicação foi a existência de cicatriz uterina por cesariana prévia. Quando aplicada a Classificação de Robson, os grupos mais frequentes foram o 5 (26,3%) e o 10 (17,4%). No ano de 2015, ocorreu um aumento significativo da frequência dos grupos 1 e 3 (p < 0,001), quando Palavras-chave comparado ao ano anterior, resultando em aumento do número de partos vaginais ► gestação (p < 0,0001) e redução das taxas de cesariana. ► gravidez de risco Conclusão AClassificaçãodeRobsonmostraserumaferramentaútilparaidentificar ► trabalho de parto operfil das parturientes e os grupos com maior risco de cesariana em diferentes ► cesárea períodos em um mesmo serviço. Desta forma, permite monitorar de forma dinâmica as ► classificação de indicações e vias de parto e desenvolver ações para redução das taxas de cesariana robson conforme as características das gestantes atendidas.
Introduction hand, if one takes into consideration only childbirths per- formed in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS, in the Surgical interventions are necessary when labor does not have Portuguese acronym), the number of vaginal deliveries is the expected physiological progression. However, nowadays, higher (59.8%) than that of cesarean sections (40.2%).8 there is a remarkable global increase in cesarean section rates, Santa Maria County, which has one of the reference as documented in different countries worldwide.1 These pro- regional obstetric services for high-risk pregnancies in the cedures help reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and countryside of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, recorded only mortality when they are properly indicated. Although safe, 32.9% of vaginal deliveries in 2010.7 Despite this finding, cesarean sections comprise surgery-inherent risks such as there are no regional studies that can be compared with infection, bleedings, thromboembolic events, placental abnor- national and international data. malities (placenta previa, placental abruption, placenta accreta) The Robson Classification, which was developed by Robson in future pregnancies, chronic pain and internal adhesions.2 In in 2001,9 has been suggested by the WHO as the standard addition, there are newborn-associated risks such as prematu- instrument to evaluate and monitor cesarean section rates in rity, transient tachypnea or respiratory distress syndrome.2,3 different hospital services.4 This classification allows distrib- According to the World Health Organization (WHO), uting all pregnant women in groups based on individual childbirth care aims at assuring the safety of mothers and features such as number of childbirths, number of previous newborns by intervening as little as possible in this process cesarean sections, gestational age, fetal presentation and twin and by performing cesarean sections in case of real need. The pregnancy.9,10 Given the clarity, objectivity and easy applica- internationally accepted ideal cesarean section rate ranges tion of this classification method, it has been used to survey, from 10 to 15% of childbirths; this range is based on lack of monitor and compare cesarean section rates within and benefit on mortality rates when cesarean sections exceed between institutions; it also allows analyzing these data, as 10% of childbirths, as shown in previous studies.4 well as identifying safe alternatives to help reducing cesarean – However, Brazilian rates are much higher than the estab- section rates.11 14 lished limit. According to Nakamura-Pereira et al.,5 cesarean The present study has analyzed childbirths performed at sections account for 51.9% of childbirths in the country. In this the Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria (HUSM, in the study, high-risk pregnant women had significantly greater Portuguese acronym), as well as classified them based on the cesarean section rates compared with low-risk women in Robson Classification, to help better understanding the real the public sector. Older primiparous and more educated situation of cesarean section indications and the profile of pregnant women who have access to private services are childbirths performed in the investigated institution. The more susceptible to abdominal delivery indications based on results may collaborate with the creation of strategies to nonclinical factors.6 The increased number of cesarean deliv- reduce the high cesarean rates in Brazilian institutions. eries changes from region to region in the country, mainly between the public and private care sectors. Southern Brazil Methods has one of the highest cesarean section rates in the country; it accounted for 58,1% of all childbirths in 2010, whereas the The current research is a retrospective cross-sectional study Southeastern region accounted for 58.3% and the Midwestern comprising data about the hospitalization of pregnant wom- region for 57.4%. The Northern and Northeastern regions en who had vaginal or cesarean delivery at the Obstetric recorded the lowest cesarean delivery indices in 2010–44.4% Center of the HUSM (a regional reference hospital for high- and 41.8%, respectively.7 The number of cesarean sections, risk pregnancies) from January 2014 to December 2015. Data which presented an upward curve, decreased by 1.5% in 2015; were collected through the review of medical records. Par- 55.5% of 3 million deliveries performed in Brazil were cesarean turients whose data did not allow their classification into sections, whereas 44.5% were vaginal deliveries. On the other Robson groups were excluded from the study.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. 86 Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section Soares et al.
During hospitalization for childbirth, labor care was man- aged according to the hospital service protocols. The evolution of births was monitored using a partogram and fetal vitality was accessed by intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate and cardiotocography if abnormal fetal heart rate or in high-risk pregnancies. A high-risk pregnancy was considered the one with increased risk for complications for the pregnant woman, the fetus or the newborn. Risk factors for a high-risk pregnancy were considered existing health conditions, such as high blood pressure, diabetes, thyropathies, hematopathies, infectious diseases, heart diseases, obesity, multiple births, among others. Parturients were distributed into 10 groups based on the Robson Classification by following instructions provided in the base article.9 Data were subjected to descriptive and analytical analyses. The chi-squared test was used to calcu- late differences between Robson groups in 2014 and 2015; Fig. 1 Comparison between delivery routes per year. Chi-squared p < 0.05 was set as statistically significant. test, p < 0.0001. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the investigated institution (CAAE 58212416.3.0000.5346). childbirths, whereas cesarean section before labor corre- Results sponded to 24.6% of cases (►Table 1). In the case of induced childbirths, 41.5% of nulliparous women and 57.4% of mul- A total of 4,061 births were recorded in the period and 51 were tiparous women evolved to vaginal delivery. Nulliparous excluded from the research due to incomplete data, remaining women who were subjected to induced delivery evolved to 4,010 for analysis. The mean maternal age was 26.2 ( 7.1) years cesarean section, whereas multiparous women evolved to old, the mean number of childbirths was 1.2, the mean gesta- vaginal delivery (p < 0.0001). tional age at birth was 37.8 weeks (►Table 1), and 49.4% of the Cesarean section was the most adopted delivery route pregnant women had at least one cesarean section prior to the (57.6% of cases); however, this rate changed depending on assessed pregnancy. Of the total number of childbirths, vaginal the number of childbirths (►Table 1) and on the investigated deliveries corresponded to 1,702 (42.4%) and cesarean sections period (►Fig. 1); 49.7% of the total number of nulliparous to 2,308 (57.6%) comprised cesarean sections. Sixty-one cases women and 62.6% of the total of multiparous women evolved of fetal death (1.5%) were recorded throughout the studied to cesarean section. The main indications for cesarean sec- period; 83.6% of them happened in preterm pregnancies. tion comprised previous cesarean section (39.7%), nonreas- Parturients were hospitalized for spontaneous delivery in suring fetal status (16.4%), cephalopelvic disproportion 49.7% of cases, induced deliveries accounted for 25.7% of (12.6%), induction failure (8.4%) and pelvic presentation of
Table 1 Demographic and obstetric features of Parturients
Total (n ¼ 4,010) Nulliparous (n ¼ 1,568) Multiparous (n ¼ 2,442) Maternal age 26.2 ( 7.1) 21.9 ( 5.78) 28.9 ( 6.48) Previous pregnancies 2.4 ( 1.60) 1.1 ( 0.40) 3.3 ( 1.52) Number of childbirths 1.2 ( 1.44) 0 (0) 2.0 ( 1.35) Number of previous cesarean sections 0.6 ( 0.98) 0 (0) 0.9 ( 1.12) Miscarriages 0.2 ( 0.51) 0.1 ( 0.39) 0.3 ( 0.57) Gestational age 37.8 ( 4.51) 37.7 ( 3.96) 37.8 ( 4.83) Hospitalization due to spontaneous labor 1,991 (49.7%) 760 (48.5%) 1,231 (50.5%) Induced labor 1,031 (25.7%) 627 (40.0%) 404 (16.5%) Cesarean section without labor 988 (24.6%) 181 (11.5%) 807 (33.0%) Delivery type Vaginal delivery 1,693 (42.2%) 782 (49.9%) 911 (37.31%) Instrumented delivery 9 (0.2%) 6 (0.4%) 3 (0.1%) Cesarean section 2,308 (57.6%) 780 (49.7%) 1,528 (62.6%)
Deliveries at Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria, from January 2014 to December 2015; Mean standard deviation; number and percentage of cases.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section Soares et al. 87
tion. The age group 20 years was associated with sponta- neous and induced labor onset (p < 0.0001), whereas the age group between 26 and 40 years old was associated with cesarean section without labor (p < 0.0001), as shown in ►Fig. 2. The age group 20 years old was also associated with vaginal deliveries (p < 0.0001), whereas the others were associated with cesarean sections; such association was only significant in the age group between 26 and 40 years old (p < 0.0001). Based on the comparative analysis between 2014 and 2015, the number of childbirths increased from 1,769 in 2014 to 2,241 in 2015, mainly at the expense of the total number of vaginal deliveries (►Fig. 1). In 2014, vaginal deliveries accounted for 37.9% of childbirths, whereas cesar- ean sections accounted for 62.1% of cases. In 2015, vaginal deliveries accounted for 46.1% of childbirths, whereas cesar- ean sections accounted for 53.9% of cases. The number of cesarean deliveries was larger in 2014 than in 2015, whereas 2015 recorded higher rates of vaginal deliveries than 2014 Fig. 2 Labor onset time divided into groups, based on age group. (p < 0.0001). Another important aspect was the attendance of a greater number of healthy pregnant women in 2015. In the fetus (7.4%). In the studied periods (2014 and 2015), 2014, the number of high-risk pregnancies was 17.4% and in previous cesarean sections were the main indication for 2015, 14.1% (p ¼ 0.016). operative delivery and the number of previous cesareans, After data collection, parturients were distributed into 10 one or two or more did not vary (p ¼ 0.141). groups based on the Robson Classification (►Table 2). Most The stratification of pregnant women by age group women were allocated to group 5 (26.4%), which was fol- revealed differences in labor onset and in delivery evolu- lowed by groups 10 (17.5%) and 2 (16.0%).
Table 2 Cesarean section distribution based on Robson 10-group classification
Births Features 2,308/ Rate per Cesarean section Contribution from Group 4,010 group rate per group each group 1 Nulliparous, single fetus, cephalic presenta- 125/517 12.9% 24.2% 3.1% tion, > 37 weeks, spontaneous labor 2 Nulliparous, single fetus, cephalic presenta- 422/642 16.0% 65.7% 10.5% tion, > 37 weeks, induced labor or cesarean sec- tion before labor 3 Multiparous, no previous cesarean section, single 59/491 12.2% 12.0% 1.5% fetus, cephalic presentation, > 37 weeks, spontaneous labor 4 Multiparous, no previous cesarean section, single 181/364 9.1% 49.7% 4.5% fetus, cephalic presentation, > 37 weeks, induced labor or cesarean section before labor 5 Multiparous with at least 1 previous cesarean 930/1,057 26.4% 80.0% 23.2% section, single fetus, cephalic presentation, > 37 weeks 6 Nulliparous, single fetus in pelvic presentation 80/81 2.0% 98.8% 2.0% 7 Multiparous, single fetus in pelvic presentation, 76/78 1.9% 97.4% 1.9% likelihood of previous cesarean section 8 Anywomanwithtwinpregnancy;likelihoodof 64/68 1.7% 94.1% 1.6% previous cesarean section 9 Any woman with oblique or transverse fetal pre- 12/12 0.3% 100.0% 0.3% sentation; likelihood of previous cesarean section 10 Any woman with a single fetus in cephalic presen- 359/700 17.5% 51.23% 8.9% tation, < 37 weeks, likelihood of previous cesarean section
Deliveries at the Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria, from January 2014 to December 2015.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. 88 Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section Soares et al.
tioned study in comparison to 23.2% in the study conducted at our institution).15,16 Although Santa Maria County has two public maternity hospitals – one for high-risk pregnancies (HUSM) and an- other for habitual-risk pregnancies –,intheyear2015,the HUSM was the only reference for pregnant women treated by the SUS, both at local and regional levels, because the habitual-risk maternity hospital was temporarily closed. Thus, the HUSM conducted both high-risk and habitual- risk childbirths. This specific event has affected the total number of childbirths, as well as increased the vaginal delivery rate and the number of spontaneous childbirths in the institution in 2015, a fact that proportionally increased the number of pregnant women in groups 1 and 3. The HUSM presented results similar to the ones recorded by Tapia et al. (2016)17 in Latin America and by Yadav et al. (2016)18 in India when it started to perform all childbirths, not just the high-risk ones.17,18 Therefore, the comparison between Rob- son Classification results and data available in the literature Fig. 3 Robson groups analysis per year. Chi-squared test, p < 0.001. allowed observing that the frequency of pregnant women in each group was associated with population type, as it was also reported by Zahumensky et al. (2019),14 who compared Based on the analysis of 2014 and 2015 (in separate), three Slovak centers presenting different healthcare profiles: Robson groups 5 and 10 (►Fig. 3) were the most frequent one tertiary center with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), ones. However, based on the association between the evaluat- intensive care unit (ICU) and two other centers that only ed years (2014 and 2015) and Robson classification groups, treated pregnant women with gestational age > 32 weeks. there was a significant increase in the number of pregnant The aforementioned study has found differences in the most women in groups 1 and 3 in 2015 (p < 0.001). The number of recurrent Robson groups in each service, as well as cesarean cases in Group 1 increased from 10.7% to 14.6% in 2014, and section rate variations from service to service. This outcome from 9.9% to 14.1% in Group 3. Thus, Group 1 became the third highlighted the influence of healthcare profile on the deliv- most frequent one in 2015; it took the position of Group 2 in ery and cesarean rates in each service.14 2014, although most women remained in groups 5 and 10. Based on results of the present study, most women Thus, the year of 2015 had higher number of parturients belonged to group 5 during data collection at the HUSM – without comorbidities (p ¼ 0.016), greater number of primip- this group accounted for 25% of childbirths. This finding arous and multiparous women with spontaneous onset of confirms the fact that the incidence of previous cesarean labor without previous cesarean sections (p < 0.001) and sections was the main indication for cesarean section in the higher rates of vaginal delivery (p < 0.0001). However, despite investigated service. Group 10 was the second most frequent the lower rate of cesarean section in 2015, there was no one, corresponding to births before the 37th gestational reduction in the need for newborns to be admitted to the week. This finding is justified by the fact that the investigated neonatal therapy unit (p ¼ 0.542) nor reduction in the number hospital is the only regional reference center for high-risk of fetal deaths (p ¼ 0.777). pregnancies, including prematurity cases. The distribution of parturients into Robson groups Discussion changes from service to service depending on the profile of pregnant women. In comparison to other studies that have The comparison between 2014 and 2015 has shown changes applied the Robson Classification in Brazil, a WHO survey in the profile of parturients; Robson groups 1 and 3 increased conducted in Latin America has shown that the most fre- and, consequently, the number of vaginal deliveries also quent groups were 1 and 3.15 According to a study conducted increased in 2015. This difference between the investigated in a tertiary hospital in Campinas County, the main groups years is justified by the fact that the profile of pregnant were 1 and 5.11 Groups 1, 3 and 10 were the most frequent in women changed between 2014 and 2015. In other words, the Peru, whereas an analysis of childbirths conducted in India introduction of habitual-risk pregnant women in the group based on the same classification method has also found that treated in the investigated service has generated a healthcare groups 1 and 3 were the most frequent.16,17 On the other profile with tendencies similar to the ones reported by hand, Zahumensky et al. (2019)14 compared three different Senanayake et al. (2019),15 who conducted a study with Slovak obstetric centers and found differences in the fre- 7,504 women in Sri Lanka. According to the aforementioned quency of cesarean sections, mainly in groups 1, 2 and 5. researchers, groups 1 and 3 were the most prevalent ones, Group 1, which was the largest group in the three services, whereas Group 5 was the one that mostly increased the accounted for the most significant difference between the cesarean section rates (29.6% of indications in the aforemen- absolute and relative numbers of cesarean sections.14
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section Soares et al. 89
Since the HUSM is a reference center for high-risk preg- in countries investigated by Vogel et al. (2015),13 there is a nancies in the central region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul worldwide trend toward increased numbers of obstetric inter- and has a neonatal ICU, this hospital receives a large number ventions, as well as increased labor induction rates and larger of referrals for cesarean sections (indicated in the county of number of cesarean sections without labor. This outcome also origin of the pregnant women), for induced or preterm labor highlights the association between the increased number of management, as well as for other maternal and fetal com- women with previous cesarean section and the increased plications such as premature rupture of membranes, mater- number of cesarean delivery indications in countries present- nal hypertension and twin pregnancy, which may lead to ing moderate or low HDI.13 preterm births. These conditions make groups 2, 5 and 10 the According to the Department of Informatics of the SUS most frequent ones in the service. Women who have had one (DATASUS, in the Portuguese acronym), the state of Rio cesarean section, as the ones in Group 5, are important Grande do Sul recorded 37% of vaginal deliveries in 2014. determinants of the overall high cesarean section rates. Based on the current results, the HUSM recorded a vaginal Strategies focused on reducing the frequency of cesarean delivery rate equal to 37.7% in 2014; this value was in sections should encourage women to avoid clinically unnec- compliance with the ones recorded for the state.7 However, essary primary cesarean sections, correctly manage labor in since the HUSM also performed habitual-risk deliveries in women with history of cesarean delivery, perform the exter- 2015, the vaginal delivery rate increased to 46% and reached nal cephalic version for pelvic presentations, as well as values higher than the mean recorded for the state. vaginal delivery of twins with the first fetus in cephalic The secondary and retrospective data source used in presentation, and reduce iatrogenic preterm delivery.13,14 the present study may have led to selection and measure- Another important effort focused on reducing cesarean ment bias. The case loss rate was low; it accounted for delivery rates lies on labor induction when childbirth is 1.5% of cases, which were excluded from the analysis. It indicated. According to a Portuguese study, the cesarean happened because the variables required to classify preg- section rate resulting from labor induction reached 20.9%; nant women based on the Robson Classification were not this number corresponded to 23% of the total number of available in the hospital records. Despite these limitations, cesarean sections. According to the aforementioned study, themainstrengthofthepresentstudyliesonthefactthat the Foley catheter for cervical preparation was the most it was the first research focused on analyzing childbirth adopted method in labor induction cases comprising preg- profiles at the HUSM, which is a reference regional tertia- nant women with previous cesarean section. These cases ry hospital with high-risk pregnancy representativeness were associated with high rates of labor induction failure in the SUS. and, consequently, with high rates of cesarean sections due Although the Robson classification is a great tool to help to their direct association with Robson group 5.18 identifying and monitoring the main groups at risk of being According to studies available in the literature, induction subjected to cesarean section, many countries and institu- failure rates range from 23.4 to 33.8%.19,20 The present study tions have been questioning the risk of bias when the method recorded the following induction failure rates: 42.5% for is used to compare different maternity hospitals due to multiparous women and 58.5% for primiparous women, different care levels and maternal features. A recently pub- which corresponded to the 4th largest cesarean section lished Italian study has shown that higher complexity hos- age.21,22 Since the HUSM is a regional reference for high- pitals are associated with higher cesarean section rates and risk deliveries – including prematurity and maternal pathol- with maternal features such as maternal age and gestational ogy cases –, the large number of induced delivery failures in diabetes, which are seen as independent risk factors for this hospital has an impact on cesarean section rates. Such cesarean section.23,24 number also represents the risk of having another cesarean Based on the current results, the cesarean section rate in section in the future, a fact that hinders intervention meas- the HUSM is higher than that found in other national and ures focused on reducing cesarean section rates in the international studies, but it is similar to the rate recorded investigated service, in the short term. In addition, different for the state, as reported by Brunherotti et al. (2019),25 who induction methods and induction failure concepts may found a cesarean section rate of 60.7% in Southern Brazil. hinder the analysis of and the comparison between studies. Since Group 5 presents a larger number of cesarean sections Despite the recommendation of the WHO to maintain than the other groups, and since the incidence of previous cesarean section rates in, at most, 15%, the national cesarean cesarean section is the main indication for cesarean sec- delivery rate reached 52% in 2009; the present study recorded tions, it is necessary to take actions focused on changing the the following rates for the HUSM: 62.1% in 2014 and 53.9% in current scenario, mainly on raising the awareness about 2015.7 Cesarean deliveries in Campinas County accounted for first cesarean section avoidance when it is not really 46.6% of the total number of childbirths from 2009 to 2013.11 necessary. Based on another WHO survey, which was conducted in The Robson 10-group Classification System was a useful several countries, cesarean sections performed in Brazil tool in the initial analysis of childbirth profiles in the service from 2010 to 2011 accounted for 47% of childbirths.12 The investigated herein. This classification allows monitoring the cesarean section rate between 2008 and 2010 reached 30.1% in evolution of cesarean section rates in the hospital, based on Peru, whereas in India it reached 25.1% between 2004 and actions aimed at reducing cesarean section rates, labor26 and 2013.16,17 Regardless of the Human Development Index (HDI) achieving rates closer to the ones recommended by the WHO.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. 90 Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section Soares et al.
Conclusion referral hospital in Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;129(03): 236–239. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.026 The Robson Classification proved to be a useful tool to identify the 12 Torloni MR, Betrán AP, Souza JP, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, Merialdi M. Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic profile of parturients and the groups with the highest risk of review. PLoS One. 2011;6(01):e14566. Doi: 10.1371/journal. cesarean sections in different periods in the same service. Thus, it pone.0014566 allows monitoring in a dynamic way the indications and delivery 13 Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, routes and developing actions to reduce cesarean rates according et al; WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn to the characteristics of the pregnant women attended. Health Research Network. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. Contributors 2015;3(05):e260–e270. Doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X All authors participated in the concept and design of the 14 Zahumensky J, Psenkova P, Nemethova B, Halasova D, Kascak P, present study; analysis and interpretation of data; draft- Korbel M. Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates at three university ing or revising of the manuscript, and they have approved hospital labor units using the Robson classification system. Int J the manuscript as submitted. All authors are responsible Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;146(01):118–125. Doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12842 15 Senanayake H, Piccoli M, Valente EP, Businelli V, Mohamed R, for the reported research. Fernando R, et al. Implementation of the WHO manual for Robson classification: an example from Sri Lanka using a local database Conflict of Interests for developing quality improvement recommendations. BMJ The authors have no conflict of interests to declare. Open. 2019;9(02):e027317. Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027317 16 Betrán AP, Gulmezoglu AM, Robson M, Merialdi M, Souza JP, Wojdyla D, et al. WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal References health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections. Reprod 1 Patah LEM, Malik AM. Modelos de assistência ao parto e taxa de Health. 2009;6:18. Doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-6-18 cesárea em diferentes países. Rev Saude Publica. 2011;45(01): 17 Tapia V, Betrán AP, Gonzales GF. Caesarean section in Peru: 85–94. Doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102011000100021 analysis of trends using the Robson classification system. PLoS 2 Silver RM. Implications of the first cesarean: perinatal and future One. 2016;11(02):e0148138. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148138 reproductive health and subsequent cesareans, placentation issues, 18 Yadav RG, Maitra N. Examining cesarean delivery rates using the uterine rupture risk, morbidity, and mortality. Semin Perinatol. Robson’s ten-group classification. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016; 2012;36(05):315–323. Doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.013 66(Suppl 1):1–6. Doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0738-1 3 Kozhimannil KB, Arcaya MC, Subramanian SV. Maternal clinical 19 Vargas S, Rego S, Clode N. Robson classification system applied to diagnoses and hospital variation in the risk of cesarean delivery: induction of labor. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(09): analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database. PLoS Med. 513–517. Doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667340 2014;11(10):e1001745. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001745 20 Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, 4 Organização Mundial da Saúde. Declaração da OMS sobre taxas de Scheve EJ. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induc- cesáreas [Internet]. GenebraOrganização Mundial da Saúde2015 tion of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105 [cited 2019 Mar 01]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/ (04):690–697. Doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38 bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_por.pdf 21 Thangarajah F, Scheufen P, Kirn V, Mallmann P. Induction of labour 5 Nakamura-Pereira M, do Carmo Leal M, Esteves-Pereira AP, et al. in late and postterm pregnancies and its impact on maternal and Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in neonatal outcome. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76(07): Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reprod Health. 793–798. Doi: 10.1055/s-0042-107672 2016;13(Suppl 3):128. Doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7 22 Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, da Silva AA. [Epidemiology of preterm 6 Dias MAB, Domingues RMSM, Pereira APE, FonsecaSC, daGamaSGN, birth: current trends]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010;32(02): Theme Filha MM, et al. Trajetória das mulheres na definição pelo 57–60. Doi: 10.1590/S0100-72032010000200001 parto cesáreo: estudo de caso em duas unidades do sistema de saúde 23 Gabbay-Benziv R, Hadar E, Ashwal E, Chen R, Wiznitzer A, suplementar do estado do Rio de Janeiro. Cien Saude Colet. 2008;13 Hiersch L. Induction of labor: does indication matter? Arch (05):1521–1534. Doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232008000500017 Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(06):1195–1201. Doi: 10.1007/ 7 Ministério da Saúde DATASUS. Indicadores e dados básicos [In- s00404-016-4171-1 ternet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Mar 01]. Available from: http://tabnet. 24 Gerli S, Favilli A, Franchini D, De Giorgi M, Casucci P, Parazzini F. Is datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?idb2012/f08.def the Robson’s classification system burdened by obstetric pathol- 8 Valadares C. Pela primeira vez número de cesarianas não cresce no ogies, maternal characteristics and assistential levels in compar- país. Agência Saúde [Internet] 2017 Mar 10 [cited 2019 Mar 01]. ing hospitals cesarean rates? A regional analysis of class 1 and 3. Available from: http://portalms.saude.gov.br/noticias/%20agen- J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(02):173–177. Doi: cia-saude/27782 10.1080/14767058.2017.1279142 9 Robson MS. Classification of cesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med 25 Brunherotti MAA, Prado MF, Martinez EZ. Spatial distribution of Rev. 2001;12(01):23–39. Doi: 10.1017/S0965539501000122 Robson 10-group classification system and poverty in southern 10 Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F. Quality assurance: The 10-Group and southeastern Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;146(01): Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, 88–94. Doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12831 and cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 1): 26 Bolognani CV, Reis LBSM, Dias A, Calderon IMP. Robson 10-groups S23–S27. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.026 classification system to access C-section in two public hospitals of 11 Ferreira EC, Pacagnella RC, Costa ML, Cecatti JG. The Robson ten- the Federal District/Brazil. PLoS One. 2018;13(02):e0192997. Doi: group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary 10.1371/journal.pone.0192997
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. THIEME Original Article 91
Factors Associated with Exclusive Breastfeeding in a Maternity Hospital Reference in Humanized Birth Fatoresassociadosaoaleitamentomaternoexclusivo em uma maternidade referência em parto humanizado Gabriela Pinheiro Brandt1 Alan Messala A. Britto2,3 Camila Carla De Paula Leite1 Luciana Garangau Marin1
1 Maternidade Bairro Novo, Curitiba, PR, Brazil Address for correspondence Gabriela Pinheiro Brandt, Rua Barão de 2 Programa de Oncovirologia, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Antonina, 522, Curitiba - PR, 80530-050, Brazil Janeiro, RJ, Brazil (e-mail: [email protected]). 3 Department of Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2021;43(2):91–96.
Abstract Objective To analyze the factors associated with the prevalence of exclusive breast- feeding (EBF) for up to six months in mother/infant binomials cared for at a usual-risk maternity hospital. Methods The present is a descriptive, longitudinal, prospective, quantitative study. Socioeconomic, obstetric and perinatal variables from 101 mother/infant binomials in a Public Maternity Hospital in the city of Curitiba, state of Paraná, Brazil, were investigated during hospitalization after delivery and 6 months after birth. For the statistical analysis, the Chi-squared test was used. The variables that showed values of p < 0.25 for the Chi-squared test were also submitted to an odds ratio (OR) analysis. Keywords Results The prevalence (42.6%) of EBF was observed. Most women (93.1%) had had ► breastfeeding more than 6 prenatal consultations, and the variables maternity leave and support to ► weaning breastfeeding were associated with EBF. Support to breastfeeding by professionals and ► humanization family members increased 4-fold the chance of maintenance of EBF (OR ¼ 0.232; 95% ► natural childbirth confidence intercal [95%CI]: 0.079 to 0.679; p ¼ 0.008). Cracked nipples were the ► cesarean section biggest obstacle to breastfeeding, and low milk production was the main responsible factor for weaning. Conclusion The encouragement of breastfeeding and the mother’sstayforalonger period with the child contributed to the maintenance of EBF until the sixth month of life of the infant.
Resumo Objetivo Analisar os fatores associados à prevalência do aleitamento materno exclusivo (AME) até seis meses em binômios mãe/recém-nascido atendidos em uma maternidadederiscohabitual.
received DOI https://doi.org/ © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e May 7, 2020 10.1055/s-0040-1718450. Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. accepted ISSN 0100-7203. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the August 14, 2020 Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, published online distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. January 19, 2021 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda., Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil 92 Exclusive Breastfeeding in a Maternity Hospital Reference in Humanized Birth Brandt et al.
Métodos Trata-se de um estudo descritivo, longitudinal, prospectivo e quantitativo. Foram investigadas variáveis socioeconômicas, obstétricas e perinatais de 101 binô- mios mãe/recém-nascido de uma maternidade pública em Curitiba-PR no interna- mento após o parto e 6 meses após o nascimento. Para a análise estatística, utilizou-se o teste do qui-quadrado. As variáveis cujo teste do qui-quadrado tiveram valores de p < 0,25 foram testadas para análises de razão de probabilidades (RP). Resultados Observou-se a prevalência (42,6%) do AME. A maioria das mulheres (93,1%) havia realizado mais de 6 consultas de pré-natal, e as variáveis licença maternidade e apoio para amamentar estiveram associadas ao AME. O apoio para Palavras-chave amamentar por parte do profissional e do familiar aumentou em 4 vezes a chance da ¼ fi ► aleitamento materno permanência em AME (RP 0,232; intervalo de con ança de 95% [IC95%]: 0,079 a p ¼ fi ► desmame 0.679; 0,008). A ssura foi o maior obstáculo para a amamentação, e a baixa ► humanização produção de leite, o principal responsável pelo desmame. ► parto normal Conclusão O incentivo ao aleitamento e a permanência da mãe por mais tempo com ► cesárea a criança contribuíram para a manutenção do AME até o sexto mês de vida do bebê.
Introduction Methods
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends exclu- The present is a descriptive, longitudinal, prospective study sive breastfeeding (EBF) on demand, in the first six months of with a quantitative approach. It was performed in a habitual- life, and, later, breastfeeding must be supplemented with risk public maternity hospital in the city of Curitiba, state of other foods up to 2 years of age or older.1 It is said that an Paraná (PR), Brazil, a reference in humanization, with the infant is in EBF when he/she feeds only on breast milk, BFHI reputation. The inclusion criteria were: women aged without consuming other foods or liquids.2 This is the 18 years who gave birth to live newborns at term ( 37 most complete food, and it meets the nutritional needs in weeks), by normal delivery or cesarean section, at the the first six months of life.3 The benefits of breastfeeding go maternity hospital. Women who had premature births, beyond nutritional gains, as breast milk has immunological stillbirths, whose newborn or themselves were transferred properties, favors cognitive development, and protects to high-complexity care, and who did not answer the second infants from diseases such as dehydration, diarrhea and questionnaire were excluded. pneumonia, which are important causes of infant mortality.4 Data were collected in two moments: 1) by interview in For the puerperal woman, it promotes the affective bond the maternity hospital, within the first 48 hours of life, in the with her baby, prevents bleeding, and reduces the risk of months of January and February 2019; and 2) through a developing cancer.3 phone call with the mother, at 6 months of life of the infant, Increasing EBF rates are a goal to be achieved worldwide, in August 2019. The collection was prospective and used 2 and the WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNI- structured questionnaires, composed of 12 and 10 questions – CEF) promote and encourage the continuity of EBF.2 6 In respectively, prepared by the researchers and previously 2011, the global EBF rate in infants from 0 to 6 months was of tested. In the first questionnaire, socioeconomic, obstetric 35%, and it increased to 40% in 2019.2,7 In Brazil, although the and perinatal variables were collected, while in the second, EBF index is gradually increasing, its maintenance is ob- we collected information about the duration of the EBF and served for shorter periods than the recommended six the type of breastfeeding the infant was on at six months.8 months. ►Fig. 1 shows the flowchart of the data collection Research3,4,6 shows that the duration and continuity of and the selection of mother/infant binomials based on the EBF are linked to socioeconomic variables such as age and inclusion and exclusion criteria. maternal schooling, family income and occupation, and to In the first contact, the women who agreed to participate obstetric and perinatal variables, such as assiduous par- signed the free and informed consent form (FICF), with a total ticipation in prenatal care, delivery and type of assistance of 141 participants. Telephone contact was obtained with only received during childbirth, as well as the support provided 101 participants in the second collection, even after 3 attempts by the professionals and family members to breastfeeding. to call at different dates and times. We analyzed the outcome Given the aforementioned information, the present study and the type of breastfeeding according to the classification by intended to analyze the factors associated with the prev- the WHO: EBF, when the infant is fed only breast milk, without alence of EBF for up to six months in mother/infant the addition of other foods or liquids; breastfeeding (BF), binomials cared for at a maternity of usual risk that is when, in addition to breast milk, the infant is fed other liquid reference in good practices in care for childbirth, with and/or solid foods; and mixed breastfeeding (MBF), when the Baby–Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) reputation. infant is fed breast milk and baby formula.9
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. Exclusive Breastfeeding in a Maternity Hospital Reference in Humanized Birth Brandt et al. 93
Table 1 Breastfeeding outcome (n ¼ 101)
Variable n % Breastfeeding Yes 75 74.3 No 26 25.7 Breastfeeding type Exclusive breasfeeding 43 42.6 Breastfeeding 19 18.8 Mixed breastfeeding 13 12.9 Weaning 26 25.7
nicipality of Curitiba (under opinion No. 3,060,900 on December 6, 2018).
Results
Overall, 101 mother/newborn binomials were interviewed, most of which were still breastfeeding (74.3%) (►Table 1). As for the type of breastfeeding at six months of life, 42.6% remained on EBF, and almost a third of the sample continued to breastfeed, but not exclusively (BF ¼ 18.8%; MBF ¼ 12.9%), and only 25.7% of the infants weaned early (►Table 1). Regarding the characteristics of the population, the most prevalent maternal age group was 20 to 34 years (80.2%), and just over 80% of the mothers had more than 8 years of Fig. 1 Flowchart of the data collection and selection of mother/infant schooling (►Table 2). It is noteworthy that there were no binomials. illiterate women, and that 71.3% of them had at least We collected socioeconomic variables (age and maternal graduated from High School. The most frequent family schooling, family income, occupation and maternity leave), income was more than 2 minimum wages (74.3%), and half obstetric variables (type of delivery, parity, and number of of the women reported contributing to the houehold income, prenatal consultations), and variables related to good peri- since they worked (49.5%; ►Table 2). As for the employment natal practices (skin-to-skin contact [when the infant stays relationship, 36.6% were employed with a formal contract, with the mother immediately after the birth for at least and 12.9% declared themselves self-employed. Regarding 1 hour], breastfeeding in the first hour of life, and support to maternity leave, 38.6% enjoyed a period of 4 to 6 months breastfeeding from a professional or family member) to look of maternity leave. Most women were primiparous (47.5%), for an association with EBF. Regarding the variable maternal had a normal birth (73.3%), and had regular prenatal care schooling, illiterate women and those with incomplete ele- with more than 6 consultations (93.1%). Regarding good mentary education were included in the ‘less than 8 years of practices, skin-to-skin contact stood out as the experience schooling’ group, while those with complete elementary most lived by women (78.2%), which results in a good rate of education up to complete higher education were included breastfeeding in the first hour of life (65.3%). Also notewor- in the ‘more than 8 years of schooling’ group. The factors that thy is the high prevalence of ‘support to breastfeeding’ made breastfeeding difficult and the factors that motivated (74.3%), showing the engagement of the team and family weaning were also analyzed. members in breastfeeding. This support was defined as a set The information was tabulated in Excel 2016 (Microsoft of practices and information that the puerperal woman Corp., Redmond, WA, US) spreadsheets, and the statistical received from the multiprofessional team during hospitali- analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the zation, and, later, the support she received at home from the Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US), version family to continue breastfeeding. 21.0. The absolute and relative frequencies were calculated, The comparison between the mother/infant binomials in addition to the search for an association of the variables who maintained EBF with those that did not, and the with EBF through the chi-squared test of independence, in association with the socioeconomic, obstetric and perinatal which values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. The variables were performed using the Chi-squared test variables that had values of p < 0.25 in the Chi-squared test (►Table 2). Regarding the socioeconomic variables, only were tested for an analysis of the odds ratio (OR) using the maternity leave was statistically different among the groups. MedCalc web site (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ra- Contrary to expectations, the women who did not take tio.php). The present research was submitted to analysis and maternity leave maintained EBF for longer periods when approved by the Ethics in Research Committee of the mu- compared with those who took leave (p ¼ 0.02). The obstetric
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. 94 Exclusive Breastfeeding in a Maternity Hospital Reference in Humanized Birth Brandt et al.
Table 2 Association of exclusive breastfeeding and socioeconomic, obstetric and perinatal variables (n ¼ 101)
Variable Exclusive breastfeeding p-value Total Yes No n(%) n(%) n(%) 43 58 101 Age 18–19 years 4 (9.3) 5 (8.6) 0.96 9 (8.9) 20–34 years 34 (79.1) 47 (81.0) 81 (80.2) > 35 years 5(11.6) 6 (10.4) 11 (10.9) Schooling < 8 years 11(25.6) 8 (13.8) 0.71 19 (18.8) > 8 years 32 (74.4) 50 (86.2) 82 (81.2) Family income 2 minimum wages 9 (20.9) 17 (29.3) 0.56 26 (25.7) > 2 minimum wages 34 (79.1) 41 (70.7) 75 (74.3) Currently employed Yes 19 (44.2) 31 (53.4) 0.26 50 (49.5) No 24 (55.8) 27 (46.6) 51 (50.5) Maternityleave Yes 13(30.2) 26(44.8) 0.02 39 (38.6) No 30 (69.8) 32 (55.2) 62 (61.4) Birth type Normal 30 (69.8) 44 (75.9) 0.31 74 (73.3) Cesarean section 13 (30.2) 14 (24.1) 27 (26.7) Parity First pregnancy 19 (44.2) 29 (50.0) 48 (47.5) 2–3 pregnancies 21 (48.8) 24 (41.4) 0.75 45 (44.6) 4 pregnancies 3 (7.0) 5 (8.6) 8 (7.9) Prenatal consultation < 6 3(7.0) 4 (6.9) 0.98 7 (6.9) 6 40 (93.0) 54 (93.1) 94 (93.1) Skin-to-skin contact Yes 30 (69.8) 49 (84.5) 0.07 79 (78.2) No 13 (30.2) 9 (15.5) 22 (21.8) Breastfeeding in the first hour Yes 26 (60.5) 40 (69.0) 0.37 66 (65.3) No 17 (39.5) 18 (31.0) 35 (34.7) Support to breastfeeding Yes 38 (88.4) 37 (63.8) 0.005 75 (74.3) No 5 (11.6) 21 (36.2) 26 (25.7)
Source: Data of the survey, 2019. Note: p < 0.05. Table 3 Main difficulties with breastfeeding and reasons for variables type of delivery, prenatal consultations,andparity weaning (n ¼ 101) did not present a statistically significant difference among the women who maintained EBF or not at six months Variable n % (►Table 2). As for the variables related to good perinatal Difficulty breastfeeding No 54 53.5 practices, EBF was more prevalent among the women who ¼ received support to breastfeed than among the women who N 101 Fissure 23 22.8 did not maintain EBF (p ¼ 0.005), and the variable skin-to- Mastitis 5 5.0 skin contact, despite not having presented a statistically Engorgement 1 1.0 fi signi cant difference, tended to be lower among the Lowmilkproduction 18 17.8 mother/infant binomials who maintained EBF. Reason for weaning Return to work 7 26.9 Then, we evaluated whether the variables maternity leave, N ¼ 26 support to breastfeeding (which were associated with breast- Lowmilkproduction 11 42.3 feeding) and skin-to-skin contact (which tended to be associ- By option 8 30.8 ated with breastfeeding) were risk or protective factors for EBF through the calculation of the OR. This analysis showed Source: Research data, 2019. that taking maternity leave tended to increase the probabili- ty of maintenance of the EBF (OR ¼ 0.533; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.232 to 1.225; p ¼ 0.138), and skin-to-skin breastfeeding 4-fold (OR ¼ 0.232; 95%CI: 0.079 to 0.679; contact tended to decrease this probability (OR ¼ 2.359; 95% p ¼ 0.008). CI: 0.90 to 6.1845; p ¼ 0.081). In contrast, professional and Finally, the factors that made breastfeeding difficult and family support to breastfeeding increased the chance of that influence weaning were investigated (►Table 3).
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. Exclusive Breastfeeding in a Maternity Hospital Reference in Humanized Birth Brandt et al. 95
Approximately half of the interviewees (46.5%) reported The studied population had a high rate of normal delivery some difficulty in breastfeeding, the most predominant (73.3%), the most recommended route for birth by the WHO. being ‘nipple fissure’ (22.8%), followed by the complaint of Cesarean section, in turn, is considered a hindrance to low ‘milk production’ (17.8%). Weaning affected 25.7% of the breastfeeding in the first hour of life, a variable that has population, and low milk production appears as the main already been related to the longer duration of breastfeed- driver (42.3%), followed by weaning by maternal option ing.3,8 Although two thirds of the mothers studied had (30.8%) and return to work (26.9%). breastfed in the first hour of life, there was no association between this variable and EBF. 13 Discussion A Cochrane review sought randomized trials on skin-to- skin contact and breastfeeding, and concluded that mothers In view of the benefits for the mother/infant binomial and the who had skin-to-skin contact breastfed exclusively for longer – WHO recommendations regarding the maintenance of EBF in periods.5 13 Although skin-to-skin contact was more fre- the first six months of life of the infant, the aim of the present quent among women who weaned in this particular sample, study was to describe the socioeconomic, obstetric and the practice is encouraged by the WHO, and it corresponds to perinatal aspects related to childbirth care that influenced step four of the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding in the EBF in an usual-risk maternity, a reference in good practices BFHI.12 in childbirth and birth care. There was a high rate of Women who received ‘support to breastfeeding’’ were 4 breastfeeding (73.4%) among the population studied, in times more likely to maintain EBF (p ¼ 0.008). The support addition to EBF rates (42.6%) above the data estimated for network for the puerperal woman must start in the prenatal Brazil (38.6%) and the world (40%), according to data from the period, and remain during the care received at the hospital and UNICEF.7 In Brazil, EBF rates have been gradually increasing, after discharge, since, due to the difficulties that arise during and although they are almost twice as high as those in the breastfeeding period, the puerperal woman can seek middle- and upper-income countries (23.9%), they are still support and continue to breastfeed.6 The support of the far behind the rates of countries like Rwanda (86.9%), Bur- partner in this network reinforces the importance of family undi (82.3%) and Sri Lanka (82%), which have the highest EBF members involvement in the whole process of gestating, rates in the world.7 In the state of Pernambuco, Brazil, a study giving birth and maternal. The importance of the team in revealed that the median period of EBF was of only 60.84 maintaining EBF during hospitalization at the maternity hos- days, which indicates that the good practices of the institu- pital is highlighted, as the mother/infant binomials discharged – tion studied here and the BFHI seem to have positively on EBF are 2.5 times more likely to maintain the EBF.3 14 The influenced the maintenance of EBF.8 hospital where the present study took place offers support AgeisoneofthefactorsthatcanaffectEBF.Someauthors through the promotion, protection and encouragement of believe that women over the age of 30 breastfeed longer than breastfeeding during the entire hospitalization. This is done younger women, and that adolescence can be a weaning through guidance and assistance in breastfeeding, added to the factor.3,4 In the present study, most women were aged between good practices of care during childbirth. The maternity in 20 and 34 years, but age was not associated with EBF. Likewise, question has an Interdisciplinary Committee on Breastfeeding, theEBFwasnotrelatedtoschooling.Therearereportsthat which is composed of an engaged multidisciplinary team mothers with more than eight years of schooling breastfeed (doctors, nurses, nutritionist, social worker and speech thera- more,astheyhavemoreaccesstoinformation.3 In addition, the pist) and promotes courses, workshops, lectures, research and low level of schooling can also delay the beginning of prenatal discussions in this field, with the objective of supporting care, which directly results in successful breastfeeding.3 In breastfeeding and increasing breastfeeding rates. The assis- contrast, the higher level of schooling of the women can tance team works with individualized care and daily physical increase the rate of formal employment and result in an early examination of the breasts to identify nipple fissures, engorge- return to work, which influenced the early weaning of 7 of the ment and solve the doubts of the women during the entire 26 patients who stopped breastfeeding before 6 months.8 hospitalization. The maternity hospital also has an exclusive In the present study, women who did not take maternity breastfeeding support room, a pleasant and reserved place, leave breastfed more. There are studies that state that the which is ideal for individualized and differentiated care. All mother's presence at home is positive for the continuity of women should be instructed on the importance of breastfeed- EBF, while others claim the opposite.3,10 In the present study, ing, on the correct position to breastfeed, on milking the all unemployed women belonged to the group who did not breasts when necessary, and on the prevention of fissures receive maternity leave, so we believe that staying at home and other complications, and as to when to seek help and for this population is a factor that protects breastfeeding. professional support. Regular prenatal care with more than six consultations Difficulties in breastfeeding usually occur in cascade. The and mainly with quality of care and guidance is a greatly for position of the mother/infant binomial affects the grip and the success of breastfeeding.2,8 A high adherence to prenatal suction, which can result in nipple fissure that generates care was observed in the studied group (93% had had 6 pain.5 Due to pain, the puerperal woman tends to offer the consultations). A longitudinal study2 with 531 infants in breast less often to the infant, which increases the likelihood 2012 found that the absence of prenatal care increased the of low milk production or results in breast engorgement.15 chance of reducing breastfeeding time by 173%. Nipple fissure, the most frequent complaint in this
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. 96 Exclusive Breastfeeding in a Maternity Hospital Reference in Humanized Birth Brandt et al.
population, is seen in the literature as an important factor for 3 Margotti E, Margotti W. [Factors related to exclusive breastfeed- weaning.15 Although many women have reported insuffi- ing in babies born in a child-friendly hospital in a northern – cient milk production, it is known that, biologically, the Brazilian capital]. Saúde Debate. 2017;41(114):860 871. Doi: 10.1590/0103-1104201711415 production is sufficient for their children. This statement 4 Cavalcanti SH, Caminha MdeF, Figueiroa JN, Serva VMSBD, Cruz denotes the insecurity that usually disappears over time, if RSBLC, de Lira PIC, Batista Filho M. Factors associated with 6 the mother receives adequate guidance and support. breastfeeding practice for at least six months in the state of The bias of postpartum memory failure and the fact that Pernambuco, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015;18(01):208–219. the second part of the data collection was performed by Doi: 10.1590/1980-5497201500010016 telephone, which may allow for some misunderstanding in 5 Carreiro JA, Francisco AA, Abrão ACFV, Marcacine KO, Abuchaim ESV, Coca KP. Breastfeeding difficulties: analysis of a service the questions used, are the main limitations of the present specialized in breastfeeding. Acta Paul Enferm. 2018;31(04): study. Thus, it is necessary to conduct new studies with the local 430–438. Doi: 10.1590/1982-0194201800060 population, and to compare different institutions to promote 6 Amaral LJX, Sales SdosS, Carvalho DPSRP, Cruz GKP, Azevedo IC, current results that strengthen breastfeeding assistance. Ferreira Júnior MA. [Factors that influence the interruption of exclusive breastfeeding in nursing mothers]. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2015;36(Spec No):127–134. Doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2015. Conclusion esp.56676 7 United Nations Organization. [UNICEF: only 40% of children in the The factors that were associated with the duration of EBF in world receive exclusive breastfeeding early in life] [Internet]. New the present study were staying at home with the child longer, York: United Nations; 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 15]. Available from: and the support of the professional or family members to https://nacoesunidas.org/unicef-apenas-40-das-criancas-no- breastfeeding, which reduced the chance of interrupting EBF mundo-recebem-amamentacao-exclusiva-no-inicio-da-vida/ 8 Santos EMD, Silva LSD, Rodrigues BFS, de Amorim TMAX, da Silva four-fold. Although the other variables discussed here are not CS, Borba JMC, Tavares FCLP. [Breastfeeding assessment in chil- fi fl signi cant, it is known that good practices re ect on all of dren up to 2 years of age assisted in primary health care of Recife assistance provided and throughout the life of the in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil]. Cien Saude Colet. 2019;24 mother/infant binomial. Finally, data on the factors associat- (03):1211–1222. Doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018243.126120171 ed with early weaning provide a basis to support interven- 9 Ministério da Saúde Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde Departamento tions and discussions capable of improving the quality of de Atenção Básica. [Child health: breastfeeding and complemen- tary feeding]. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2015 care for the maternal and infant population. 10 Campos AMS, Chaoul CdeO, Carmona EV, Higa R, do Vale IN. Exclusive breastfeeding practices reported by mothers and the Contributors introduction of additional liquids. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015; All authors participated in the concept and design of the 23(02):283–290. Doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0141.2553 present study, in the analysis and interpretation of data, in 11 Silva CM, Pereira SCL, Passos IR, Santos LC. [Factors associated the draft or revision of the manuscript, and they have with skin-to-skin contact between mother / child and breastfeed- ing in the delivery room]. Rev Nutr. 2016;29(04):457–471. Doi: approved the manuscript as submitted. All authors are 10.1590/1678-98652016000400002 responsible for the reported research. 12 D’Artibale EF, Bercini LO. The practice of the fourth step of the baby-friendly hospital initiative. Esc Anna Nery. 2014;18(02): Conflict of Interests 356–364. Doi: 10.5935/1414-8145.20140052 The authors have no conflict of interests to declare. 13 Moore ER, Bergman N, Anderson GC, Medley N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11(11):CD003519. Doi: 10.1002/ References 14651858.CD003519.pub4 1 World Health Organization. Guideline: protecting, promoting and 14 Cruz NACV, Reducino LM, Probst LF, Guerra LM, Ambrosano GMB, supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and Cortellazzi KL, et al. [Association between the type of breastfeed- newborn services [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2017 [cited 2019 Oct ing at discharge of the newborn and at six months of life]. 20]. Available from: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/ Cad Saude Colet. 2018;26(02):117–124. Doi: 10.1590/1414- guidelines/breastfeeding-facilities-maternity-newborn/en/ 462x201800020349 2 Ferreira HLOC, Oliveira MF, Bernardo EBR, Almeida PC, Aquino PS, 15 Moraes BA, Gonçalves AC, Strada JKR, Gouveia HG. Factors associ- Pinheiro AKB. Factors associated with adherence to exclusive ated with the interruption of exclusive breastfeeding in infants up breastfeeding. Cien Saude Colet. 2018;23(03):683–690. Doi: to 30 days old. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2017;37(spe):e2016-0044. 10.1590/1413-81232018233.06262016 Doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2016.esp.2016-0044
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. THIEME Original Article 97
Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Tendência temporal do near miss e suas variações regionais no Brasil de 2010 a 2018 Maria Carolina Wensing Herdt1 Flávio Ricardo Liberal Magajewski1 Andressa Linzmeyer1 Rafaela Rodolfo Tomazzoni1 Nicole Pereira Domingues1 Milla Pereira Domingues1
1 Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Tubarão, SC, Brazil Address for correspondence MariaCarolinaWensingHerdt,Avenida José Acácio Moreira, 787, Bairro Dehon, Tubarão, SC, Brazil Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2021;43(2):97–106. (e-mail: [email protected]).
Abstract Cases of maternal near miss are those in which women survive severe maternal complica- tions during pregnancy or the puerperium. This ecological study aimed to identify the temporal trend of near-miss cases in different regions of Brazil between 2010 and 2018, using data from the Hospital Information System (HIS) of the Unified Brazilian Health System (SUS, in the Portuguese acronym). Hospital admission records of women between 10 and 49 years old with diagnosis included in the 10th Revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) and codes indicating near- Keywords miss events were selected. From 20,891,040 admissions due to obstetric causes, 766,249 ► near miss (3.66%) near-miss cases were identified, and 31,475 women needed admission to the ► maternal mortality intensive care unit (ICU). The cases were found to be more predominant in black women ► hospital records over 35 years old from the North and Northeast regions. There was a trend of increase in ► complications of near-miss rates of 13.5% a year during the period of the study. The trend presented a pregnancy different behavior depending on the level of development of the region studied. The main ► morbidity causes of near miss were preeclampsia (47%), hemorrhage (24%), and sepsis (18%).
Resumo Casos de near miss materna são aqueles em que as mulheres sobrevivem a graves complicações maternas durante a gravidez ouopuerpério.Esteestudoecológicoteve como objetivo identificar a tendência temporal de casos de near miss em diferentes regiões do Brasil entre 2010 e 2018, utilizando dados do Sistema de Informações Hospitalares (SIH) do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Foram selecionados registros de internação de mulheres entre 10 e 49 anos com diagnóstico incluído na 10ª revisão da Classificação Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde (CID-10) e códigos indicando eventos de near miss.Das Palavras-chave 20.891.040 internações por causas obstétricas, 766.249 (3,66%) casos de near miss foram ► near miss identificados, e 31.475 mulheres necessitaram de internação na unidade de terapia intensive ► mortalidade materna (UTI). Constatou-se que os casos são mais predominantes em mulheres negras com mais de 35 ► registros hospitalares anos da região Norte e Nordeste. Houve uma tendência de aumento nas taxas de near miss de ► complicações da aproximadamente 13,5% ao ano durante o período do estudo. A tendência apresentou um gravidez comportamento diferente, dependendo do nível de desenvolvimento da região estudada. As ► morbidade principais causas de near miss foram pré-eclâmpsia (47%), hemorragia (24%), e sepse (18%).
received DOI https://doi.org/ © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e April 20, 2020 10.1055/s-0040-1719144. Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. accepted ISSN 0100-7203. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the September 14, 2020 Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, published online distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. January 19, 2021 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda., Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil 98 Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Herdt et al.
Introduction causes of maternal mortality.9 The identification of these cases is increasingly recognized as a useful strategy for assessing the The health of woman and child is a priority in the modern quality ofobstetric care. In other words, maternal near miss is a world, and losses during the pregnancy-puerperium cycle and sensitive and relevant indicator related to women’s health childhood are considered unacceptable to families and socie- care, and it seems to be associated with the level of human and ty.1 Rosendo and Roncalli2 demonstrated that the reduction of social development in different societies.10 the rates of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality The clarification of the temporal trend of maternal near depends on investments and the restructuring of the assis- miss, which is the main age range affected and its risk factors, tance provided to pregnant women and newborns to improve contributes to the expansion of knowledge on a subject that is its quality, which includes training and qualification of doctors not as much discussed, and can serve as a tool for monitoring and health professionals for promotion of safer maternity. To the network and add to the endorsement of public policies that achieve this, they must be able to manage pregnancy, child- protect women from maternal complications and, conse- birth, and risky situations or complications in women and/or quently, reduce the mortality and morbidity rates of this newborns.3 group. It is estimated that 273,000 maternal deaths occurred in The question that guided this research was: which were the world in 2011. However, reduction of the maternal mortali- the temporal trends of maternal near miss and its regional ty rate (MMR) has been slow, 2.3% a year, since 1990. In Brazil, variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018. between 2000 and 2014, the average maternal mortality rate was 55.7 deaths/100,000 live births. Despite the good perfor- Methods mance as a nation, it is important to take a closer look at mortality rates in the macro-regions of the country, which This was an observational ecological study that analyzed tem- presented considerable disparity. From every 100,000 live poral series of data from the Hospital Information System of the births, 78.6 mothers died in the North region in 2014. The Unified Brazilian Health System (HIS/SUS, in the Portuguese Northeast presented the second-highest maternal mortality acronym). Records of women between 10 and 49 years old from rate (71.3 deaths/100,000 live births), followed by the South- different regions of Brazil, admitted between 2010 and 2018, west (54.6 deaths/100,000 live births), Central-West (54.3 were considered. The selectionwas done according to thefields: deaths/100,000 live births), and South (37.6 deaths/100,000 main diagnosis, secondary diagnosis, macro-region, race, and live births).4 admission to the ICU. Most pregnancies evolve in a physiological and healthy The database was composed following the algorithm pre- way, and end in uneventful labor, but among the spectrum of sented in ►Table 1, using the tabulation software, Tabwin. healthy pregnancy and maternal death, we can identify First, all hospital records of women living in Brazil, admitted several harmful conditions for women.5 The Maternal Mor- between 2010 and 2018, were selected, totaling 59,911,177 bidity Working Group of the World Health Organization admissions. Then, filters of age (10 to 49 years old) and main (WHO), when analyzing the epidemiology of the pregnan- diagnosis included in Chapter XV - Pregnancy, childbirth, and cy-obstetric-puerperal cycle, established and validated the the puerperium -ofthe10th Revision of the International concept of maternal near miss (near maternal death) or Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity (SAMM), which are situa- Table 1 Risk rates (x100 deliveries) of admissions due to a near- tions in which certain women almost died from complica- miss event by macroregion and year of occurrence tions that occurred during pregnancy, childbirth or the puerperium, but somehow survived.6 In practical terms, a Year\ North Northeast Southeast South Central- Total pregnant woman is considered a case of near miss when she Region West faces serious life-threatening conditions similar to those that 2010 6.40 5.65 5.31 4.78 5.57 5.52 lead to death, but survives. 2011 6.83 5.73 5.28 4.69 4.98 5.52 To standardize these criteria, the WHO developed a clas- 2012 6.87 5.90 5.38 4.67 4.34 5.55 sification based on three axes of severe maternal morbidity: 2013 6.95 5.91 5.33 4.83 4.66 5.58 clinical, laboratory and management markers. In addition to 2014 6.94 6.12 5.16 4.61 4.13 5.52 this classification, there are two more widely used classi- 2015 6.17 5.99 5.10 4.66 4.57 5.39 fi 7 cations, one elaborated by Mantel et al. and Waterstone 2016 6.67 6.91 5.54 5.79 5.12 6.11 8 et al., both being based on different approaches, with 2017 7.70 7.92 6.18 6.42 5.57 6.88 different specificities and sensitivities. The classification 2018 8.17 7.89 6.42 6.61 6.08 7.11 adopted by the WHO makes it possible to identify the Mean 6.95 6.41 5.52 5.18 4.99 5.89 most serious cases, with a higher risk of death; however, Spearman 0.5 0.97 0.55 0.53 0.34 0.64 the Waterstone criteria and the Mantel criteria, by using Beta 0.63 0.89 0.71 0.82 0.37 0.80 clinical disorders or identifiable organ dysfunctions, expand p-value 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.32 0.06 the possibility of detecting the cases.7,8 Taking into account that near miss cases occur more Spearman ¼ Spearman coefficient of correlation; Beta ¼ mean annual frequently than maternal deaths, their study allows a broader variation (near-miss cases/100 deliveries/year); p-value (ANOVA). ¼ p < identification of the risk factors most associated with the 0.05.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Herdt et al. 99
Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Prob- systems as long they are related to pregnancy, childbirth, and lems (ICD-10)11 were applied, resulting in 20,891,040 women the puerperium, whereas Waterstone’s criteria include clin- admitted as the population of the study. ical diagnoses of the most frequent pathological conditions To select the records of admissions due to SAMM - near of pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium, such as severe miss - the ICD-10 codes corresponding to the near-miss preeclampsia, hemorrhage, sepsis, and uterine rupture.7,8 diagnosis were used according to the criteria and definitions Admission records that contained procedures regarding established by Mantel et al.7 and Waterstone et al.,8 as seen clinical complications of pregnancy were removed because in Chart 1.7,8 Mantel’s criteria include conditions that are the codes related to the complications do not discriminate typical of organic dysfunctions in organs and human body their severity and could encompass any complication, even
Chart 1 Near miss classification
Mantel’s criteria A.1 Organ dysfunction Criteria/definitions Generic categorization of diagnoses [ICD-10 Codes] Pulmonary edema [J81] 1. Cardiac dysfunction Cardiomyopathy; congestive heart failure 1.1 Pulmonary edema [I11.0; I42.0; I42.1; I42.8; I42.9; I43.8; I46; I46.0; 1.2 Cardiac Arrest I46.9; I50.0; I50.1; I50.9; O75.4; O90.3; R57.0] 3. Immunological dysfunction Infection; sepsis; genital tract and pelvic infection complicating abortion 3.1 Admission to the ICU for sepsis Peritonitis; salpingitis [A02.1; A22.7; A26.7; A32.7; 3.2 Emergency hysterectomy for sepsis A40; A40.0; A40.1; A40.2; A40.3; A40.8; A40.9; A41; A41.0; A41.1; A41.2; A41.3; A41.4; A41.5; A41.8; A41.9; A42.7; A54.8; B37.7; K35.0; K35.9; K65.0; K65.8; K65.9; M86.9; N70.0; N70.9; N71.0; N73.3; N73.5; O03.0; O03.5; O04.0; O04.5; O05.0; O05.5; O06.0; O06.5; O07.0; O07.5; O08.0; O08.2; O08.3; O41.1; O75.3; O85; O86; O86.0; O86.8; O88.3; T80.2] 4. Respiratory dysfunction 4.1 Intubation and ventilation for more than 60 minutes except for Respiratory failure; respiratory arrest; embolism general anesthesia 4.2PeripheralO2saturation< 90% for more than 60 minutes Embolism complicating abortion [I26.9; J80; J96; J96.0; 4.3 Ratio Pa O2/ FiO2 3 J96.9; O03.7; O04.7; O05.2; O06.2; O06.7; O88.1; Ratio Pa O2/ FiO2 300 mm Hg R09.2] 5. Renal dysfunction Renal failure following abortion [O08.4; R34] 5.1 Oliguria, defined as diurese < 400 ml/24 hour 5.2 Acute urea deterioration to 15 mmol/l or Acute kidney failure [E72.2; I12.0; I13.1; I13.2; creatinine > 400 mmol/l N17; N17.0; N17.1; N17.2; N17.8; N17.9; N18.0; O08.4; O90.4] Mantel’s criteria A.1 Organ dysfunction Criteria/definitions Generic categorization of diagnoses [ICD-10 Codes] 6. Liver dysfunction Liver dysfunctions; viral hepatitis complicating pregnancy, childbirth 6.1Jaundiceduringpreeclampsia and the puerperium [K72; K72.0; K72.9; O26.6; O98.4] 7.Metabolicdysfunction Diabetesmellituswithcomaorketoacidosis[E10.0; (Continued)
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. 100 Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Herdt et al.
Chart 1 (Continued)
7.1DiabeticKetoacidosis E10.1;E11.0;E11.1;E12.0;E12.1;E13.0;E13.1; E14.0; E14.1] 7.2 Thyrotoxic crisis Thyrotoxicosis; metabolic disorder following abortion [E05; E05.0; E05.1; E05.2; E05.3; E05.4; E05.5; E05.8; E05.9; E06.0; E07; E07.8; E07.9; O08.5] 8. Coagulation dysfunction Disseminated intravascular coagulation; coagulation deficiencies 8.1 Acute thrombocytopenia requiring transfusion of platelets [D65; D68; D68.9; D69.4; D69.5; D69.6; D82.0; O45.0; O72.3] 9.Sub-arachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage Intracerebral hemorrhage; stroke; vertebral venous thrombosis during pregnancy [G93.6; I60; I60.0; I60.1; I60.2; I60.3; I60.4; I60.5; I60.6; I60.7; I60.9; I61; I61.0; I61.1; I61.2; I61.3; I61.4; I61.5; I61.6; I61.8; I61.9; I64; I69.1; O22.5] Waterstone’s criteria Criteria/codes Generic categorization of diagnoses [ICD-10 Codes] 1.Severepreeclampsia Moderate,severeorunspecified pre-eclampsia; pre-existing hyper- tension with superimposed proteinuria [O11; O14.0; O14.1; O14.9] 2. Eclampsia Eclampsia complicating pregnancy, childbirth or the puerperium [O15; O15.0; O15.1; O15.2; O15.9] 3. HELLPc syndrome 4.Severehemorrhage Delayedorexcessivehemorrhagecomplicatingabortion.Placenta previa with hemorrhage. Premature separation of placenta [D62; O03.1; O03.6; O04.1; O04.6; O05.1; O05.6; O06.1; O06.6; O07.1; O07.6;O08.1; O44.1; O45.0; O45.8; O45.9; O46; O46.0; O46.8; O46.9; O67.0; O67.8; O67.9; O69.4; O72; O72.0; O72.1; O72.2] 5. Sepsis Infection; septicemia; genital tract infection complicating abortion. Peritonitis. Salpingitis [A02.1; A22.7; A26.7; A32.7; A40; A40.0; A40.1; A40.2; A40.3; A40.8; A40.9; A41; A41.0; A41.1; A41.2; A41.3; A41.4; A41.5; A41.8; A41.9; A42.7; A54.8; B37.7; K35.0; K35.9; K65.0; K65.8; K65.9; M86.9; N70.0; N70.9; N71.0; N73.3; N73.5; O03.0; O03.5; O04.0; O04.5; O05.0; O05.5; O06.0; O06.5; O07.0; O07.5; O08.0; O08.2; O08.3; O41.1; O75.3; O85; O86; O86.0; O86.8; O88.3; T80.2] 6. Uterine rupture Rupture of uterus before or during labor. Disruption of cesarean delivery wound [O71.0; O71.1; O90.0] Waterstone’s criteria Criteria/definitions Generic categorization of diagnoses [ICD-10 Codes] 1. Acute abdomen Acute abdomen [R10.0] 2.Diseasecausedbyhumanimmunodeficiency virus d Infection caused by the human immunodeficiency virus [B20; B20.0; B20.1; B20.4; B20.8; B20.9]
Abbreviations: ICD-10, 10th Revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems; ICU, Intensive care unit; HELLP syndrome, hemolysis (H), high levels of liver enzymes (EL) and low platelet count (LP).
those not related to severe maternal morbidity, what would ICD-10 were removed – a total of 425 cases, which is less than allow the same patient to be included twice (by the main 0.05% of the cases considered. diagnosis and by the procedure they were submitted to). For each year of the temporal trend, the rate of SAMM was Importantly, the admissions due to near-miss events consid- calculated by dividing the number ofhospital admissions due to ered were chosen based on the application of the criteria for severe maternal morbidity by the total number of deliveries sequential selection, eliminating the risk of duplicates. during the same period, multiplied by 100. That is, the rate of To perform the temporal analysis of near-miss cases in SAMM ¼ (near-miss cases/total of deliveries) 100. The denom- Brazil, all admission records with codes included in Chapter inator considered the number of deliveries included in the XV of ICD-1011 were selected, totalizing 765,824 cases. Near- database according to the main diagnosis included in each miss cases with secondary diagnosis in other chapters of the inpatient hospital authorization (IHA) found at the HIS/SUS and
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Herdt et al. 101 not the number of live births, since it is not possible to The collection sequence performed to meet the goals of distinguish between the births that are financially supported this research can be understood more clearly in the flowchart by the SUS and those that are not in the Brazilian Live Birth below (►Fig. 1): Information System (SINASC, in the Portuguese acronym). Only admissions supported by the SUS between 2010 and 2018 were Results included in this study. The absolute and relative frequencies of admissions for The retrospective research of women admitted to any hos- near-miss events were described according to the most pital, anywhere in the country, due to complications related recent criteria. The age was stratified in 5-year intervals to pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium, financially with the intent to estimate the frequency and near-miss supported by the SUS, during a 9-year period (2010–2018), rates according to different age groups in the reproductive resulted in a total of 20,891,040 admissions. From this total, cycle. 766,249 admissions (3.66%) due to SAMM - near miss, were The average annual variation of each series, obtained by selected. From these cases, it was verified that 31,475 simple linear regression (Beta coefficient - β), was used to women (4.1%) needed to be admitted to the intensive care analyze the trends of severe acute maternal morbidity. The unit (ICU) (►Table 1). strength of the time-event correlation was obtained by ►Table 1 shows that near-miss rates presented a trend of calculating the Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The sta- increase in every region of Brazil. The Northeast region had tistical significance was calculated by the analysis of vari- the most expressive increase. The time-event correlations in ance (ANOVA), and 95% was adopted as the significance level all regions, except North and Central-West, represented by (p < 00.5). the Spearman correlation test, were strong and significant For being an ecological study with population aggregation (p < 0.05). Brazil, as a whole, presented a positive average analysis without research subjects and of public access, it was variation of 0.80 near-miss cases per every 100 deliveries a not necessary to subject it to registration and analysis of the year, which represents an increase of 13.5% a year. Women Ethics Committee of Research involving Human Beings, accord- from the North region presented a risk of a near-miss event ing to Resolution no. 510/2016 of the National Health Council 25% higher than those from the Central-West region, which (CNS) (Article 1, Paragraph one of one, clauses III and V). had the lowest average risk rate.
Fig. 1 Schematic flowchart of the data collection process and selection of near-miss cases.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. 102 Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Herdt et al.
Table 2 Risk rates (x100 deliveries) of admissions due to a near- rhage two times higher (RR 2.06; CI 95% 1.93 - 2.21; miss event by age group of the patient and year of occurrence p < 0.001) and a 33% higher risk of sepsis when compared with the Central-West region (RR 1.33; CI 95% 1.23–1.44; Year/Age 10–14 15–19 20–29 30–39 40–44 45–49 Total p < 0.001). In the Southeast region, the risk of uterine group rupture was 133% higher than in the Central-West region 2010 6.07 4.44 4.99 7.71 11.64 18.28 5.52 (RR 2.33; CI 95% 1.60-3.40; p < 0.001). The Central-West 2011 6.16 4.49 4.95 7.59 12.52 18.09 5.52 region presented the lowest risk rates for causes related to 2012 6.04 4.47 5.02 7.53 12.22 19.28 5.55 near-miss events, which is the reason why it was used as a 2013 6.38 4.47 5.02 7.59 12.87 19.51 5.58 base of comparison for the regions with higher specific risk. 2014 5.97 4.39 4.91 7.65 12.64 19.29 5.52 Women admitted due to a maternal near miss were 31 2015 5.43 4.21 4.81 7.43 12.98 18.37 5.39 times more likely to be admitted to the ICU (RR 31.32; CI 95%: 28.82 - 34.03, p < 00.001). 2016 5.70 4.56 5.42 8.65 14.24 19.52 6.11 2017 6.90 5.03 6.09 9.63 15.82 22.90 6.88 2018 6.70 5.14 6.26 9.87 16.14 22.39 7.11 Discussion Mean 6.12 4.56 5.26 8.21 13.51 19.61 5.89 The present study verified a trend of increase of 13.5% a year Spearman’s 0.18 0.53 0.56 0.51 0.97 0.85 0.64 in hospital admissions due to near-miss events in Brazil during Beta 0.31 0.65 0.77 0.79 0.92 0.79 0.80 the period of the study. This trend is corroborated by a Brazilian p-value 0.42 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.06 study that analyzed the period between 2000 and 2012 and also verified an increase in the risk rates of near miss.12 Spearman ¼ Spearman coefficient of correlation; Beta ¼ mean annual When taking into account the average rates of SAMM in variation (near-miss cases/100 deliveries/year); p-value (ANOVA). Brazil during the period between 2010 and 2018, there is a risk rate of 5.89 near-miss cases per every 100 deliveries, which is ►Table 2 indicates a trend of increase in all the series of higher than those of other studies that also used the HIS/SUS – rates analyzed, with statistical significance (p < 0.02) from database.2 13 In the population-based study of Sousa et al. in 20 years old on. The increase in risk occurred along with the 2008,14 they analyzed different Brazilian capitals and macro- increase in the maternal age, from 15 years old on, and was regions and found a rate of 44.3/1,000 live births. more prominent in the age groups 40 to 44 and 45 to 49 years Nevertheless, maternal mortality in Brazil remained sta- old (β ¼ 0.917 and 0.792, respectively). Moreover, patients ble during the last few years, contrary to the positive trend in aged 40 to 49 years old presented a chance of having a near- severe maternal morbidity.14 This apparent contradiction miss event almost 3 times higher than the age group with the highlights the importance of discussing near miss, as it is lowest risk—age group 15 to 19 years old (relative risk [RR] possible that the identification of a higher number of cases 2.61; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 2.39–2.89; p < 0.001). might have guaranteed more comprehensive assistance to a With regards to the skin color of the hospitalized women, greater number of women in a risky obstetric situation, black women presented a risk of a near-miss event 19% reducing the more severe outcomes. higher than white women (RR 1.19; CI 95%: 1.06–1.33; The average risk rate of near miss in the Northeast region p < 0.001) (►Table 2). found in the present study (6.41/100 deliveries), despite In ►Table 3, considering the Waterstone’s criteria, the using a different methodology, was higher than the estimates main causes of hospitalization due to a near-miss event were of SAMM presented in the study of Rosendo and Roncalli,2 preeclampsia, with a rate of 2.78 admissions per every 100 which analyzed 167 cities of the State of the Rio Grande do deliveries (47%), followed by severe hemorrhage (24%), sep- Norte between 2008 and 2012 and verified a near-miss rate sis (18%), eclampsia (8%), and uterine rupture (3%).8 Except of 36.76/1,000 obstetric admissions. for the age group 10 to 14 years old, there was a progressive There were severe inequalities between the Brazilian macro- increase in complications due to a near-miss event following regions, especially in relation to human development.15 Astudy the increase in maternal age. Preeclampsia was the most on the evolution of the Human Development Index (HDI) in the prevalent cause of admission due to a near-miss event in Brazilian macro-regions verified that the North and Northeast every age group, followed by severe hemorrhage, predomi- regions presented the highest positive variations in every nant in the intermediate age groups and sepsis, predominant component of the HDI between 2000 and 2010, despite remain- in the extreme age groups. ing with the lowest indexes among all Brazilian regions.16 In a The prevalence of admissions due to a near-miss event broad sense, even with the improvement of the indicators of (Waterstone’s criteria) according to the macro-region of maternal and child health care verified in several studies, occurrence highlighted important differences between socioeconomic and health-care differences are still prevalent them. In the Northeast region, admission for preeclampsia in the North and the Northeast, which might explain the had an incidence 42% higher than in the Central-West region possible negative association between the highest risk rates (RR 1.42; CI 95% 1.34–1.50; p < 0.001), whereas in the South and the lowest indexes of obstetric care verified in these – region, eclampsia had an incidence 39% higher than in the regions.9 20 Moreover, the North region presented a relative Central-West region (RR 1.39; CI 95% 1.23–1.57; p < 0.001). risk of hemorrhage two times higher and a 33% higher risk of of The North region presented a relative risk of severe hemor- infection than the region with the lowest rates. This context
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Herdt et al. 103
Table 3 Rates of admissions due to a near-miss event in Brazil, between 2010 and 2018, by criteria and age group, per every 100 deliveries
Waterstone’s criteria Age groups Criteria 10 to 14 15 to 19 20 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 TOTAL Preeclampsia 2.31 1.91 2.48 4.20 6.45 6.40 2.78 Eclampsia 0.79 0.45 0.41 0.64 0.06 0.00 0.48 Severe hemorrhage 1.40 1.04 1.30 1.96 3.66 5.89 1.43 Sepsis 1.56 1.07 097 1.29 2.25 6.09 1.10 Uterine rupture 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.08 0.13 0.36 0.05 TOTAL 6.13 4.54 5.22 8.18 13.54 19.84 5.86 Mantel’scriteria Age groups Criteria 10 to 14 15 to 19 20 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 TOTAL Cardiac dysfunction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.002 0.00 0.00 Vascular dysfunction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sepsis 1.56 1.07 0.97 1.29 2.25 6.10 1.10 Respiratory dysfunction 0.015 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.01 Abortion 0.002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006 0.00 Acute kidney failure 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.01 0.002 Kidney dysfunction 0.003 0.004 0.007 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.007 Diabetic Ketoacidosis 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.003 0.005 0.00 0.001 Thyrotoxicosis 0.005 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.005 0.00 0.003 Coagulation dysfunction 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.05 Cerebral dysfunction 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.01 0.002 Pulmonary dysfunction 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.04 0.01 TOTAL 1.64 1.14 1.06 1.42 2.45 6.36 1.19 suggests challenges in the access of pregnant women to health With regards to the South region, the RR of eclampsia was care units and specialized treatment, and fits the Three Delays 39% higher than the region with the lowest risk, the Central- Model of Thaddeus and Maine,21 in which patients delay the West. This puts into question the effectiveness and quality of search for assistance due to sociocultural reasons, are not able to prenatal care in the most developed regions of Brazil. Con- access obstetric care, and when they manage to do it, they have cerning prenatal care, Viellas et al.,23 studying the period to wait for a long time to receive treatment. In these regions, between 2011 and 2012, reported a 98.7% coverage of prenatal investments aimed at organizing an efficient and articulate care throughout Brazil, and nearly 100% coverage in the South maternal care network that offers support and qualified human region. However, several obstacles might contribute to low- resources, to provide quality care to pregnant women, are quality prenatal care, such as the existence of structural essential. barriers, unavailability of medicaments and essential exams, The comparative analysis of the main near-miss complica- and problems in the provision of health-care actions involving tions in different Brazilian macro-regions demonstrated that individual attention and clinical care.23 In relation to eclamp- the Southeast region presented a 133% higher risk of uterine sia, which is preceded by well-known medical signs that are rupture. The fact that uterine rupture occurs more commonly easily identifiable in the prenatal examination, the question in women with a c-section scar makes this complication one of that arises is: what is reducing the effectiveness of the prenatal the most concerning. In this sense, the increased risk can be care offered to virtually the whole Brazilian population explained by the higher prevalence of cesarean delivery in the through the Family Health Strategy (FHS)? Concerning the Southeast region of the country. In a study of 2013, Eufrásio22 age groups, the highest near-miss rates are concentrated in the verified a prevalence of 53.03% of cesarean delivery through- population above 40 years old. This was also verified in a study out Brazil, whereas in the Southeast region the prevalence was by Morse that analyzed near-miss prevalence at a reference 59.32%. The high incidence of this type of delivery is concern- hospital in Rio de Janeiro in 2009.24 Several data found the ing, as it is known that it increases the risk of neonatal and literature point to age as a risk factor for the occurrence of maternal morbidity and mortality and has been becoming a obstetric complications, a fact associated with the increase in severe public health care problem in Brazil.22 the number of women pregnant after 40 years old. The
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. 104 Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Herdt et al.
increase in maternal age is related to the higher incidence of constitute the “main diagnosis” field in the HIS-SUS, easier.7,8 comorbidities, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, Nevertheless, the classification adopted by the WHO is more gestational diabetes, obesity, placenta previa, and need for selective for severity as it identifies cases with a higher risk of cesarean section, which are connected to the increase in the death, whereas Waterstone’s criteria tend to encompass a risk of a near-miss event.25 A Finnish study that analyzed the higher number of cases, even the ones that are less severe.8 period between 1997 and 2008 indicated that women in Despite being difficult to systematize the identification of advanced age had a risk of preeclampsia 1.5 times higher near-miss cases, it is essential to understand them to plan for than women under 40 years old.25 the assistance provided during pregnancy, childbirth, and Preeclampsia remained as the complication with the high- the puerperium. Their identification reveals relevant infor- est risk rates in Brazil during the period studied. Adisasmita mation that health-care professionals can use to avoid et al.26 also verified that 57.3% of women in Indonesia pre- maternal morbidity and mortality. Filippi et al.,29 in a study sented hypertensive syndrome as a primary determining involving three countries,—Benin, Ivory Coast, and Morocco factor. Contrarily, studies performed by Rosendo and Roncalli,2 —proposed that near-miss cases should be estimated in two and Cecatti et al.3 presented hemorrhage as the main cause of moments: cases identified at the arrival at hospital, as a good near miss. The explanation for this differencemight befound in indicator of the obstetric care during emergencies; and cases the methodology used by the studies analyzed, which were that happened after admission, as a tool for monitoring the based on self-reported morbidity. Despite severe hemorrhage quality of the obstetric services.29 having a near-miss rate lower than that of preeclampsia, it It is important to emphasize that Brazil is one of the few suffered a trend of increase following the increase of the countries that counts with a well-structured hospital informa- maternal age during the period of the study. This is a relevant tion system, the HIS/SUS, which makes data of reasonable fact considering that, once again, the non-recognition or delay quality available for the analysis of hospital morbidity and in the identification of cases and institution of effective development of preventive measures.30 Its underutilization as therapy are the only possible explanations for this reality. diagnosis and monitoring of the improvement of the quality of With resources, accurate diagnosis and assistance at the right obstetric care in Brazil is a reflection of the stage of Brazil’s moment, hemorrhage can be the most preventable of scientific and technological development. The method used in the maternal mortality causes. Nonetheless, barriers, such as the present research proved to besuitablefor the identification the lack of systematization of assistance in emergencies, of near-miss cases upon analysis of the information from the inadequate medical approach that underestimates blood HIS/UHS. These findings are corroborated by the study of Silva loss, insufficient fluid resuscitation and delay in the surgical et al.,31 performed in the State of Paraná in 2010. approach after errors in the clinical treatment, are quite Regarding the limitations imposed on this paper resulting common in obstetric centers.27 The “Birth in Brazil” survey, from the use of secondary data, we can observe that the performed between February 2011 and October 2012, reliability of the information collected at the SIH/SUS not assessed data about near miss according to the criteria of only depends on the quality of the data filled in hospital the WHO. The near-miss rate found was of 10.2/1,000 live records but also on the competence of professionals who births and 30.8 near-miss cases per every maternal death. Such register the admission diagnoses in hospitals. One should findings are conservative, as cases of abortion and complica- also take into account the fact that the SIH/SUS has as its tions that occurred during the puerperium after the hospital main duty the directing of monetary resources to hospitals, discharge were not included.28 The present study found near- and it is sometimes necessary to change the codes of proce- miss rates almost five times higher than the aforementioned dures to better adjust the financial transfer.31 Still in relation survey. The utilization of Waterstone’sandMantel’sdefini- to the difficulties attributed to this work, it is important to tions widened the criteria used for the diagnosis of maternal highlight some of these characteristics of the ecological near-miss cases, which can be considered a plausible explana- study methodology. One of the restrictive aspects concerns tion for the higher incidence found.7,8 Regarding the result of the databases of the morbidities researched, which may hospitalizations for near miss, we affirm that there was a suffer the influence of the different levels of development proportional tendency of increase between the risk rates of of each region of the country and may impact the near miss and admission to the ICU in Brazil, during thestudied reliability of the information with qualitative errors and period. In other studies, ICU admissions also showed a direct underreporting. relationship with the number of maternal near miss cases, as 2–24 well as an association with a worse prognosis. Conclusion It is important to highlight that the WHO’s criteria for near miss were not used in this research due to the difficulty in The results of the present study demonstrate a trend of correlating them with the ICD-10 diagnoses used by HIS-SUS. increase in the average risk rates of severe acute maternal For the characterization of near-miss cases, the WHO pro- morbidity in Brazil, between 2010 and 2018. The highest poses the use of the diagnosis of organ dysfunction, which near-miss rates were concentrated in the North and North- can be revealed following clinical, laboratory and treatment east region, and cases were more predominant among black criteria.6 The choice for Waterstone’s and Mantel’s criteria to women over 40 years old. The main near-miss causes that identify maternal near-miss cases made the correlation affected Brazilian women were preeclampsia, severe hemor- between the medical conditions and the ICD-10 codes, which rhage, sepsis, and uterine rupture, in this order. Maternal
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Herdt et al. 105
near miss stands out as a complement to the investigation of 9 De Souza MA, De Souza TH, Gonçalves AKS. [Determinants of maternal mortality. Its understanding helps the elaboration maternal near miss in an obstetric intensive care unit]. Rev Bras – of strategies for reducing maternal mortality as it allows for a Ginecol Obstet. 2015;37(11):498 504. Doi: 10.1590/SO100- 720320150005286 quicker obtainment of information about obstetric care since 10 Silva KS. Mortalidade materna: avaliação da situação no Rio de women that die go through the stage of organ dysfunction Janeiro, no período de 1977 a 1987. Cad Saude Publica. 1992;8 earlier. Thus, near-miss cases appear as a mean that allows (04):442–453. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-311 1992000400009 strategies for early diagnosis and prevention to be possible 11 World Health Organization. ICD-10: International Statistical Clas- and more effective. Primary prevention policies as well as sification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: 10th Revision. th well-structured programs that guarantee equity in the access 5 ed. Geneva: WHO; 2016 12 Magalhães MC, Raymundo CE, Bustamante-Teixeira MT. Morbid- to healthcare units, diagnosis, and follow-up are essential to ade materna extremamente grave a partir de registros de inter- reverse the current scenario and reduce the burden of this namento hospitalar no Sistema Único de Saúde: algoritmo para morbidity in Brazilian women. identificação dos casos. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant. 2013;13 (01):17–22. Doi: 10.1590/S1519-38292013000100002 Contributors 13 Carvalho BAS, Andrade AGBF, Dantas AS, Figueiredo IM, Silva JA, Rosendo TS, Rocalli A. Temporal trends of maternal near miss in All authors participated in the concept and design of the Brazil between 2000 and 2012. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant. study, as well as in the analysis and interpretation of data; 2019;19(01):115–124. Doi: 10.1590/1806-93042019000100007 draft or revision of the manuscript; and they have ap- 14 Sousa MH, Cecatti JG, Hardy EE, Serruya SJ. Severe maternal proved the manuscript as submitted. All authors are morbidity (near miss) as a sentinel event of maternal death. An responsible for reposted research. attempt to use routine data for surveillance. Reprod Health. 2008; 5:6. Doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-5-6 15 Szwarcwald CL, Escalante JJC, Rabello Neto DdeL, Souza Junior PR, Conflicts of Interests Victora CG. Estimation of maternal mortality rates in Brazil, 2008- fl The authors have no con ict of interests to declare. 2011. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(Suppl 1):S1–S12. Doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00125313 16 Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil [Internet]. 2013 References [cited 2019 Aug 2]. Available from: http://atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/ 1 Silva JMP, Fonseca SC, Dias MAB, Izzo AS, Teixeira GP, Belfort PP. 17 Vidor RC, Sakae TM, Magajewski FRL. Mortalidade por doença de Concepts, prevalence and characteristics of severe maternal Alzheimer e desenvolvimento humano no século XXI: um estudo morbidity and near miss in Brazil: a systematic review. Rev ecológico nas grandes regiões brasileiras. ACM Arq Catarin Med. Bras Saúde Mater Infant. 2018;18(01):7–35. Doi: 10.1590/1806- 2019;48(Suppl 1):94–107. Available from:http://www.acm.org.- 93042018000100002 br/acm/seer/index.php/arquivos/article/view/394/331 2 Rosendo TMSS, Roncalli AG. Prevalência e fatores associados ao 18 Ministério da Saúde Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde Departa- Near Miss Materno: inquérito populacional em uma capital do mento de Análise de Situação em Saúde. Saúde Brasil 2013: uma Nordeste Brasileiro. Cien Saude Colet. 2015;20(04):1295–1304. análise da situação de saúde e das doenças transmissíveis rela- Doi: 10.1590/1413-81232015204.09052014 cionadas a pobreza [Internet]. 10a ed. Brasília (DF): Ministério da 3 Cecatti JG, Souza RT, Pacagnella RC, Leal MC, Moura EC, Santos LM. Saúde; 2014 [cited 2019 Aug 2]. Available from: http://bvsms. Maternal near miss among women using the public health system saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/saude_brasil_2013_analise_situa- in the Amazon and Northeast regions of Brazil. Rev Panam Salud cao_saude.pdf Publica. 2015;37(4-5):232–238 https://scielosp.org/article/rpsp/ 19 Lima MRG, Coelho ASF, Salge AKM, Guimarães JV, Costa PS, Sousa 2015.v37n4-5/232-238/pt [Internet] TCC, et al. Alterações maternas e desfecho gravídico-puerperal na 4 Ministério do Desenvimento Regional. Superintendência do ocorrência de óbito materno. Cad Saude Colet. 2017;25(03): Desenvolvimento do Nordeste. Observatório do Desenvolvimento 324–331. Doi: 10.1590/1414-462x201700030057 do Nordeste (ODNE). Mortalidade materna e infantil. Bol Temá- 20 Souza JP, Sousa MH, Parpinelli MA, Amaral E, Cecatti JG. Self- tico Soc. 2017:1–8. Available from: http://www.sudene.gov.br/ reported maternal morbidity and associated factors among Bra- images/2017/arquivos/boletim-ODNE-sudene-mortalidade- zilian women. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2008;54(03):249–255. maternoinfantil.pdf Doi: 10.1590/S0104-42302008000300019 5 Santana DS, Guida JPS, Pacagnella RC, Cecatti JG. Near miss 21 Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in materno: entendendo e aplicando o conceito. Rev Med (São context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(08):1091–1110. Doi: 10.1016/ Paulo). 2018;97(02):187–194. Doi: 10.11606/issn.1679-9836. 0277-9536(94)90226-7 v97i2p187-194 22 Eufrásio LS. Prevalência e fatores associados ao parto cesárea no 6 Organização Mundial da Saúde. Avaliação da qualidade do cui- contexto regional brasileiro em mulheres de idade reprodutiva dado nas complicações graves da gestação: a abordagem do near [Internet] [tese]. NatalUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do miss da OMS para a saúde materna [Internet]. GenebraOMS2014 Sul2017 [cited 2019 Aug 2]. Available from: https://repositorio. [cited 2019 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.paho.org/clap/ ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/23660 index.php?option¼com_content&view¼article&id¼240:avalia- 23 Viellas EF, Domingues RMSM, Dias MAB, Gama SGN, Theme cao-da-qualidade-do-cuidado-nas-complicacoes-graves-da-ges- Filha MM, Costa JV, et al. Prenatal care in Brazil. Cad Saude tacao-a-abordagem-do-near-miss&Itemid¼234&lang¼es Publica. 2014;30(Suppl 1):S1–S15. Doi: 10.1590/0102- 7 Mantel GD, Buchmann E, Rees H, Pattinson RC. Severe acute 311X00126013 maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition for a near- 24 Morse ML, Fonseca SC, Gottgtroy CL, Waldmann CS, Gueller E. miss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(09):985–990. Doi: Severe maternal morbidity and near misses in a regional refer- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10262.x ence hospital. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2011;14(02):310–322. Doi: 8 Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of 10.1590/s1415-790x2011000200012 severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ. 2001;322 25 Lamminpää R, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. (7294):1089–1093, discussion 1093–1094. Doi: 10.1136/ Preeclampsia complicated by advanced maternal age: a registry- bmj.322.7294.1089 based study on primiparous women in Finland 1997-2008. BMC
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. 106 Temporal Trend of Near Miss and its Regional Variations in Brazil from 2010 to 2018 Herdt et al.
Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:47. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2393- 29 Filippi V, Ronsmans C, Gohou V, et al. Maternity wards or 12-47 emergency obstetric rooms? Incidence of near-miss events in 26 Adisasmita A, Deviany PE, Nandiaty F, Stanton C, Ronsmans C. African hospitals. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(01):11–16. Obstetric near miss and deaths in public and private hospitals in Doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00636.x Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:10. Doi: 10.1186/ 30 Coeli CM. Sistema de informação em saúde e uso de dados 1471-2393-8-10 secundários na pesquisa e avaliação em saúde. Cad Saude Colet. 27 Belfort MA. Overview of postpartum hemorrhage [Internet]. 2010;18(03):335–336 Available from: http://www.cadernos.iesc. WalthamUpToDate Inc2019 [cited 2019 Sep 29]. Available from: ufrj.br/cadernos/images/csc/2010_3/artigos/CSCv18n3_pag335- https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-postpartum- 6.pdf hemorrhage 31 Silva TC, Varela PLR, Oliveira RR, Mathias TAF. Severe maternal 28 Dias MAB, Domingues RMSM, Schilithz AOC, et al. Incidence of morbidity identified in the Hospital Information System of the maternal near miss in hospital childbirth and postpartum: data Brazilian National Health System in Paraná State, Brazil, 2010. from the Birth in Brazil study. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30 Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2016;25(03):617–628. Doi: 10.5123/ (Suppl 1):S1–S12. Doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00154213 s1679-49742016000300017
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. THIEME Original Article 107
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity are Related to Persistent Hyperglycemia in the Postpartum Period Diabetes mellitus gestacional e obesidade estão relacionados à hiperglicemia persistente no período pós-parto Patricia Moretti Rehder1 Anderson Borovac-Pinheiro1 Raquel Oliveira Mena Barreto de Araujo1 Juliana Alves Pereira Matiuck Diniz1 Nathalia Lonardoni Crozatti Ferreira1 Ana Claudia Rolim Branco1 Aline de Fatima Dias1 Belmiro Gonçalves Pereira1
1 Obstetrics Departament, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Address for correspondence Anderson Borovac-Pinheiro, MD, PhD, Campinas, SP, Brazil Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Barão Geraldo, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil (e-mail: [email protected]). Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2021;43(2):107–112.
Abstract Objective To evaluate the obstetric and sociodemographic characteristics of gestational diabetic women who maintained hyperglycemia in the postpartum period (6–12 weeks postpartum). Methods This is a longitudinal cohort study with women who have had gestational diabetes and/or macrosomic children between March 1st, 2016 and March 1st, 2017. Between 6 and 12 weeks after birth, women who had gestational diabetes collected fasting glycemia, glucose tolerance test, and glycated hemoglobin results. The data were collected from medical records and during an interview in the first postpartum consultation. A statistical analysis was performed using frequency, percentage, Chi- Squared test, Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney test, and multivariate Poisson regres- sion. The significance level adopted for the statistical tests was 5%. Results One hundred and twenty-two women were included. Most of the women were younger than 35 years old (70.5%), white, multiparous, and with no history of gestational diabetes. Thirteen percent of the participants developed persistent Keywords hyperglycemia. A univariate analysis showed that maternal age above 35 years, being ► gestational diabetes overweight, having grade 1 obesity and weight gain under 5 kg was related to the ► obesity persistence of hyperglycemia in the postpartum period. ► hyperglycemia Conclusion Maternal age above 35 years, obesity and overweight, and the diagnosis ► postpartum period of gestational diabetes in the first trimester of pregnancy are associated with ► overweight hyperglycemia during the postpartum period.
received DOI https://doi.org/ © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e January 9, 2020 10.1055/s-0040-1721356. Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. accepted ISSN 0100-7203. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the October 5, 2020 Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, published online distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. January 19, 2021 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda., Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil 108 Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity Rehder et al.
Resumo Objetivo Avaliar características sociodemográficas e obstétricas de mulheres com diabetes gestacional que mantêm hiperglicemia no período pós-parto (6–12 semanas pós-parto). Métodos Este é um estudo longitudinal de coorte com mulheres com diagnóstico de diabetes gestacional e/ou macrossomia fetal entre 1° de março de 2016 a 1° de março de 2017. As mulheres coletaram glicemia de jejum, teste de tolerância a glicose e hemoglobina glicada entre 6 a 12 semanas pós-parto. Os dados foram coletados de prontuários médicos e durante entrevista na primeira consulta de revisão pós-parto. Uma análise estatística foi realizada através do cálculo de frequências, porcentagens, teste do qui-quadrado, teste exato de Fisher, teste de Mann-Whitney e regressão multivariada de Poisson. A significância estatística adotada foi de 5%. Resultados Cento e vinte e duas mulheres foram incluídas. A maioria delas tinha menos de 35 anos de idade (70,5%), eram brancas, multíparas, e não tinham história de diabetes gestacional. Treze por cento das participantes desenvolveu hiperglicemia persistente. A análise univariada mostrou que os fatores relacionados com a persis- tência de hiperglicemia no período pós-natal foram: idade materna acima de 35 anos, Palavras-chave sobrepeso, obesidade grau 1 e ganho de peso abaixo de 5 quilos. A análise multivariada ► diabetes gestacional incluiu o diagnóstico no primeiro trimestre como fator de risco para hiperglicemia ► obesidade persistente. ► hiperglicemia Conclusão Mulheres acima de 35 anos, obesidade, sobrepeso e diagnóstico de ► período pós-parto diabetes gestacional no primeiro trimestre estão relacionados com hiperglicemia ► sobrepeso persistente no período pós-parto.
Introduction tum period (6–12 weeks) and evaluate the impact of obesity, overweight, and weight gain. Gestational diabetes (GD) is a condition in which a woman has increased blood glucose levels detected for the first time Methods during pregnancy and does not meet the diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus.1 It affects from 2.4 to 7.2% of pregnan- We performed a prospective cohort study at the Women’s cies in Brazil, and increased rates have been observed due to Hospital of Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil, from the epidemic of obesity and overweight.2 March 2016 to March 2017. Women with GD and/or LGA It is estimated that approximately 58% of the cases of fetuses were invited to participate after delivery, and, if diabetes mellitus in Brazil are due to obesity.3 In pregnant accepted, they signed an informed consent form. The women women with GD, higher body mass index (BMI) was associ- included in the study took part in an interview and had their ated with type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period.4 prenatal card data assessed. Subsequently, women collected Gestational diabetes is related to maternal and fetal fasting glucose, OGTT with 75g of dextrose, and glycated complications, such as neonatal hypoglycemia, macrosomia, hemoglobin results from 6 to 12 weeks postpartum. fetuses being large for gestational age (LGA), and increased The diagnostic criteria for GD, PH, and diabetes mellitus perinatal mortality.5 The worse the maternal glycemic con- were established according to the International Diabetes and trol, the worse the perinatal results will be.6 Gestation Study (IADPSG) and adopted by the American – Between 30 and 84% of all women with GD have a Diabetes Association7 9: GD is considered when women recurrence of the disease in future pregnancies, and one show fasting glycemia values 92 mg/dL and/or 75g OGTT third of the patients will maintain postpartum hyperglyce- with 1h glycemia 180 mg/dL, and/or 2h glycemia 153 mg/ – mia.7 9 In 2014, Weinert et al.10 found that 24.1% of dL; PH is considered when women show fasting glycemia women with GD had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or between 100 and 125 mg/dL and/or OGTTvalues between 140 impaired glucose tolerance within 6 to 12 weeks postpar- and 199 mg/dL; diabetes mellitus is diagnosed when fasting tum. Persistent hyperglycemia (PH) was associated with glycaemia is > 126 mg/dL or OGTT values are > 200 mg/dL.8 family history, a diagnostic 2-h 75g oral glucose tolerance Newborns were classified as LGA based on the intergrowth test (OGTT) in pregnancy, insulin use during pregnancy, curve. and C-section.10 A statistical analysis was performed with mean and The present study aimed to evaluate the profile of GD percentages. Chi-Squared or Fisher exact tests were used women who maintained hyperglycemia during the postpar- to compare categorical variables, and the Mann-Whitney test
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity Rehder et al. 109 was used to compare numerical variables. Multivariate Pois- Table 2 Gestational age at diagnosis, BMI, weight gain during son regression was performed to evaluate the prevalence pregnancy and treatment at current pregnancy ratio to develop PH. The significance level adopted for the statistical tests was 5%, that is, p < 0.05. Diagnosis N (%) The Institutional Ethics Review Board approved the study Gestational age at diagnosis (CAEE: 69791616.8.0000.5404). All research was performed < 12 w 46 (47) following relevant guidelines/regulations. Informed consent 12–24 w 24 (19.7) was obtained from all participants. 24 w 30(33.3) Results Body mass index Normal weight 27 (24.32) We included 177 women, of whom only 122 (69%) underwent Overweight 48 (43.24) laboratory tests, even after phone contact and attempts to Obese I 24 (21.62) reschedule collection. From the 122 women included, 96 had GD diagnosis during antenatal care through altered fasting Obese II 12 (10.82) glycemia values or altered OGTT. Twenty-six women had the Weight gain during pregnancy diagnosis after birthing babies classified as LGA. None of the 26 5 kg 42 (34.71) women had OGTT during antenatal care as a screening. 6–12 kg 45 (37.19) Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics are de- 13–20 kg 31 (25.62) scribed in ►Table 1. Most women were younger than 35 years > 20 kg 4 (2.48) (70.5%), white, multiparous, and with no history of GD. ►Table 2 shows diagnostic and treatment details from Treatment the studied population. Almost 50% of the patients had the Diet No 37 (30.58) Table 1 Baseline characteristics Irregular 46 (38.02) Yes (1,800-2,700 Kcal) 38 (31.40) Variables N (%) Exercises Age Yes 25 (20.66) 20 y 13 (10.66) No 82 (79.34) 21–34 y 73 (59.84) Insulin 35–39 y 30 (24.59) Yes 17 (17.00) 40 y 6 (4.92) No 83 (83.00) Race White 80 (66.12) Missing 22 11 1 15. Non-white 42 (33.88) Parity diagnosis before 12 weeks of pregnancy, and 32.44% were Primiparous 34 (27.87) obese. Seventeen (17%) women used insulin during pregnancy. Multiparous 88 (72.13) During antenatal care, the majority of the participants (68.60%) did not diet for diabetes properly to treat GD: Previous GD 30.58% did not follow any diet, and 38.02% did not adhere Yes 13 (10.66) to dietary recommendations. Regarding physical activity, 25 No 72 (59.02) (20.66%) women reported having performed physical activi- Previous macrosomia ty during pregnancy. Yes 16 (13.11) We found 16 women (13.1%) with PH during the postpar- No 65 (53.28) tum period; 10 had glycated hemoglobin above 6.1, and 11 had altered OGTT (5 women had glycated hemoglobin AND Previous comorbidities altered OGTT). The factors related to the persistence were: Yes 32 (26.23) age >35 years, being overweight, obesity grade 1, and weight No 90 (73.77) gain < 5kg(►Table 3). Familial background DM ►Table 4 shows the influence of initial BMI, gestational DM 2 76 (63.33) age at diagnosis, diet, and exercises on gestational weight gain. The factors that were related to the lowest weight gain DM 1 3 (2.50) were GD diagnosis in the first trimester, correct diet follow- None 41 (34.17) up, and obesity or being overweight at the beginning of the Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; GD, gestational diabetes. pregnancy. The performance of physical activity did not Missing 2. show statistically significant weight gain.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 43 No. 2/2021 © 2021. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved. 110 Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity Rehder et al.
Table 3 Factors related to postpartum hyperglycemia Table 5 Prevalence ratio of developing persistent hyperglycemia