DOCSLIB.ORG

FEDERAL REGISTER INDEX January–November 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FEDERAL REGISTER INDEX January–November 2020 FEDERAL REGISTER INDEX January–November 2020 Federal Aviation Administration ( Mar 12); 14559 ( Mar 13); 14784, 14789 ( Mar 16); 15919, 15922, 15938, RULES 15946 ( Mar 20); 17478, 17490 ( Mar 30); 18428 ( Apr 2); 19381 ( Apr 7); 19875 ( Apr 9); 21759 ( Apr 20); 30601 ( May 20); 41177 ( Jul 9); 44453, Accepted Means of Compliance; Airworthiness Standards: 44464 ( Jul 23); 45767, 45776 ( Jul 30); 46531 ( Aug 3); 47013 ( Aug 4); Normal Category Airplanes – 59400 ( Sep 22) 52260, 52263 ( Aug 25); 52895 ( Aug 27); 53152, 53156 ( Aug 28); 54891, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points: 54893, 54896, 54900 ( Sep 3); 55169 ( Sep 4); 59175, 59178 ( Sep 21); Charlevoix, MI – 74259 ( Nov 20) 59406 ( Sep 22); 63434, 63438 ( Oct 8); 64949, 64952, 64955, 64961, Coeur D'Alene, ID – 65677 ( Oct 16) 64963 ( Oct 14); 65190, 65197, 65200 ( Oct 15); 65674 ( Oct 16); 67965 Delavan, WI – 71534 ( Nov 10) ( Oct 27); 69129 ( Nov 2); 70051 ( Nov 4); 70439 ( Nov 5); 71238, 71240 Fallon, NV – 74855 ( Nov 24) ( Nov 9); 71529 ( Nov 10); 73401 ( Nov 18); 75838 ( Nov 27) Granby, CO – 62572 ( Oct 5); 64014 ( Oct 9) Anjou Aeronautique Torso Restraint Systems – 22953 ( Apr 24) Hartford, KY – 69148 ( Nov 2) Aspen Avionics, Inc. – 45990 ( Jul 31); 49944 ( Aug 17) Hermiston, OR – 62578 ( Oct 5) ATR - GIE Avions de Transport Regional Airplanes – 20396, 20411 ( Apr 13); Incorporation by Reference Amendments – 67267 ( Oct 22) 21762 ( Apr 20); 29596 ( May 18) Leadville, CO – 62577 ( Oct 5) ATR – GIE Avions de Transport Regional Airplanes – 73407 ( Nov 18) McChord, WA – 67442 ( Oct 23) ATR—GIE Avions de Transport Régional Airplanes – 65672 ( Oct 16) Montezuma, GA – 69147 ( Nov 2) Austro Engine GmbH Engines – 43987 ( Jul 21); 45075 ( Jul 27); 70442 ( Nov 5) Multiple Air Traffic Service Routes Due to the Decommissioning of the Aviat Aircraft Inc. – 49962 ( Aug 17) Greene County, Mississippi, VHF Omnidirectional Range – 64377 Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited Helicopters – 14786 ( Mar 16); ( Oct 13) 49941 ( Aug 17); 59661 ( Sep 23); 60356 ( Sep 25) Northcentral United States – 67439 ( Oct 23) Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. Helicopters – 7653 ( Feb 11) Norway, ME – 74857 ( Nov 24) Bell Textron Inc. (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bell Helicopter Paris, ID – 72917 ( Nov 16) Textron Inc.) Helicopters – 35555 ( Jun 11); 40584 ( Jul 7); 45779 ( Jul 30); Pendleton, OR – 62575 ( Oct 5) 57671 ( Sep 16); 69485 ( Nov 3) Petersburg, WV – 67441 ( Oct 23) Blanik Aircraft CZ s.r.o. – 49235 ( Aug 13) Toccoa, GA – 74854 ( Nov 24) Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes – 439, 457 ( Jan 6); 6752 ( Feb 6); 7857 ( Feb 12); Truckee, CA – 74852 ( Nov 24) 8145 ( Feb 13); 10974, 10978 ( Feb 26); 11284, 11286 ( Feb 27); 18431 Vicinity of New Hope, KY – 67649 ( Oct 26); 72918 ( Nov 16) ( Apr 2); 20394 ( Apr 13); 26842 ( May 6); 35175 ( Jun 9); 36318 ( Jun 16); Vicinity of Texoma, OK – 67648 ( Oct 26) 41180 ( Jul 9) Waterloo, IA – 71535 ( Nov 10) Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes – 46533 ( Aug 3); 47635 ( Aug 6); 60887 ( Sep 29) Yakima, OR – 62573 ( Oct 5) CFM International, S.A., Turbofan Engines – 14413 ( Mar 12) Yakima, WA – 65203 ( Oct 15) Cirrus Design Corporation Airplanes – 35553 ( Jun 11) Airspace Designations; Incorporation by Reference – 50779 ( Aug 18) Continental Aerospace Technologies, Inc. (Type Certificate previously held Airworthiness Directives: by Continental Motors, Inc.) Reciprocating Engines – 49954 ( Aug 17) 328 Support Services GmbH (Type Certificate Previously Held by AvCraft Daher Aircraft Design, LLC (Type Certificate Previously Held by Quest Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Aircraft Design, LLC) Airplanes – 15052 ( Mar 17) Airplanes – 21757 ( Apr 20) Daher Aircraft Design, LLC (Type Certificate previously held by Quest 328 Support Services GmbH (Type Certificate previously held by AvCraft Aircraft Design, LLC), Airplanes – 41906 ( Jul 13); 48102 ( Aug 10) Aerospace GmbH; Fairchild Dornier GmbH; Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH) Dassault Aviation Airplanes – 5313 ( Jan 30); 6744 ( Feb 6); 7860 ( Feb 12); Airplanes – 29601 ( May 18) 11280, 11289 ( Feb 27); 14143 ( Mar 11); 17487 ( Mar 30); 20405 ( Apr 13); Aermacchi S.p.A. Airplanes – 27109 ( May 7) 52254 ( Aug 25); 54888 ( Sep 3); 62990 ( Oct 6); 69142, 69144 ( Nov 2); Airbus Airplanes – 66873 ( Oct 21) 73404 ( Nov 18) Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (Type Certificate Previously Held by C De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held Series Aircraft Limited Partnership (CSALP); Bombardier, Inc.) by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes – 6749 ( Feb 6); 17473 ( Mar 30); 30595 Airplanes – 14792 ( Mar 16) ( May 20); 64958 ( Oct 14) Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (Type Certificate Previously Held by C De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate previously held Series Aircraft Limited Partnership; Bombardier, Inc.) by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes – 35177 ( Jun 9) Airplanes – 27670 ( May 11) DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Gliders – 47638 ( Aug 6) Airbus Defense and Space S.A. (Formerly Known as Construcciones Diamond Aircraft Industries Airplanes – 42687 ( Jul 15) Aeronauticas, S.A.) Airplanes – 11275 ( Feb 27) Embraer S.A. (Type Certificate Previously Held by Empresa Brasileira de Airbus Helicopters – 8150 ( Feb 13); 15924, 15933 ( Mar 20); 19077, 19080 Aeronautica S.A.) Airplanes – 36312 ( Jun 16) ( Apr 6); 30589 ( May 20); 30840 ( May 21); 31042 ( May 22); 34957 ( Jun 8); Embraer S.A. Airplanes – 453 ( Jan 6) 37549 ( Jun 23); 41910 ( Jul 13); 45765 ( Jul 30); 50770 ( Aug 18); 56161 Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes – 436, 451 ( Jan 6); 13475 ( Mar 9); 19656 ( Sep 11); 59416 ( Sep 22); 60883 ( Sep 29); 63431, 63440 ( Oct 8); 69126, ( Apr 8); 30592 ( May 20) 69131 ( Nov 2); 69488 ( Nov 3); 70955 ( Nov 6); 71235 ( Nov 9); 73604, GA8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd Airplanes – 52266 ( Aug 25) 73607, 73613, 73615 ( Nov 19); 75834 ( Nov 27) GE Aviation Czech s.r.o. (Type Certificate previously held by WALTER Airbus Helicopters (previously Eurocopter France) – 22584 ( Apr 23) Engines a.s., Walter a.s., and MOTORLET a.s.) Turboprop Airbus Helicopters (Type Certificate Previously Held by Eurocopter France) Engines – 71229 ( Nov 9) Helicopters – 27665 ( May 11); 47641 ( Aug 6) GE Aviation Czech SRO Turboprop Engines – 45069 ( Jul 27) Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH – 69493 ( Nov 3) GE Aviation Czech SRO Turboprop Engines (Type Certificate previously Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Helicopters – 45066 ( Jul 27); 49233 held by WALTER Engines AS, Walter a.s., and MOTORLET AS) – 45062 ( Aug 13); 59413 ( Sep 22); 62979 ( Oct 6) ( Jul 27) Airbus SAS Airplanes – 2284 ( Jan 15); 2627 ( Jan 16); 4199, 4201 ( Jan 24); General Electric Company Turbofan Engines – 8386 ( Feb 14); 20151 5308, 5310 ( Jan 30); 6741, 6747, 6755, 6757 ( Feb 6); 7655 ( Feb 11); 7863 ( Apr 10); 27909 ( May 12); 37000 ( Jun 19); 40586 ( Jul 7); 57666 ( Sep 16); ( Feb 12); 8148 ( Feb 13); 8383 ( Feb 14); 11277, 11282 ( Feb 27); 14409 1 Federal Aviation Administration 60898 ( Sep 29); 61811 ( Oct 1); 63193 ( Oct 7); 63443 ( Oct 8); 64375 Textron Aviation, Inc., (Type Certificate Previously Held by Cessna Aircraft ( Oct 13); 68431 ( Oct 29) Company) Airplanes – 74595 ( Nov 23) Glasflugel – 57965 ( Sep 17) Thales AVS France SAS Global Positioning System/Satellite Based Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Airplanes – 8153 ( Feb 13); 14562 Augmentation System Receivers – 20586 ( Apr 14) ( Mar 13); 36143 ( Jun 15); 37333 ( Jun 22); 71232 ( Nov 9) The Boeing Company Airplanes – 433, 449 ( Jan 6); 2624 ( Jan 16); 2867 Gulfstream Aerospace LP Airplanes – 44462 ( Jul 23) ( Jan 17); 3254 ( Jan 21); 5304 ( Jan 30); 6738 ( Feb 6); 7865, 7868 ( Feb 12); Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Propellers – 36145 ( Jun 15) 8717 ( Feb 18); 10036 ( Feb 21); 10969 ( Feb 26); 11291 ( Feb 27); 13477 Honda Aircraft Company LLC – 15926 ( Mar 20) ( Mar 9); 15056 ( Mar 17); 15930 ( Mar 20); 16237 ( Mar 23); 17480, 17483 Honeywell International Inc. Turbofan Engines – 57668 ( Sep 16) ( Mar 30); 18862 ( Apr 3); 20408 ( Apr 13); 23452 ( Apr 28); 29598 International Aero Engines AG (IAE) Turbofan Engines – 20402 ( Apr 13) ( May 18); 31046 ( May 22); 34090 ( Jun 3); 37547 ( Jun 23); 38055 ( Jun 25); International Aero Engines AG Turbofan Engines – 22956 ( Apr 24) 39470 ( Jul 1); 42689 ( Jul 15); 44456 ( Jul 23); 45762 ( Jul 30); 48465 International Aero Engines LLC, Turbofan Engines – 15054 ( Mar 17); 21073 ( Aug 11); 52257, 52268 ( Aug 25); 54885 ( Sep 3); 59180 ( Sep 21); 60048 ( Apr 16) ( Sep 24); 62981, 62993, 63002 ( Oct 6); 64009 ( Oct 9); 72555 ( Nov 13); International Aero Engines, LLC Turbofan Engines – 15943 ( Mar 20) 74560 ( Nov 20) Kidde Aerospace and Defense – 65193 ( Oct 15) Various Restricted Category Helicopters – 68429 ( Oct 29) Learjet Inc. Airplanes – 30837 ( May 21) Viking Air Limited (Type Certificate previously held by Bombardier, Inc.; Leonardo S.p.A (type certificate previously held by Agusta S.p.A) Canadair Limited) Airplanes – 443 ( Jan 6) Helicopters – 44459 ( Jul 23) Viking Air Limited Airplanes – 49957 ( Aug 17) Leonardo S.p.A. Helicopters – 10971 ( Feb 26); 37551 ( Jun 23); 45773 Weatherly Aircraft Company – 27667 ( May 11) ( Jul 30); 52893 ( Aug 27); 59409 ( Sep 22) XtremeAir GmbH Airplanes – 38052 ( Jun 25) Leonardo S.p.a. Helicopters – 55171 ( Sep 4); 55781 ( Sep 10); 59404, 59411 Yabora Industria Aeronautica S.A. (Type Certificate previously held by ( Sep 22); 60894 ( Sep 29); 66469 ( Oct 20); 73610 ( Nov 19) Embraer S.A.) – 27112 ( May 7) Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Yabora Industria Aeronautica S.A. (Type
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1993 (179Kb Pdf)
    February 4, 1993 KSC Contact: Bruce Buckingham KSC Release No. 10-93 Notice To Editors/News Directors: KSC NEWS CENTER OFFICE HOURS FOR PEGASUS ARRIVAL The NASA B-52 aircraft carrying the Orbital Sciences Cor- poration Pegasus rocket is scheduled to arrive at KSC on Sunday, Feb. 7, with launch targeted for Feb. 9. The aircraft is currently scheduled to depart Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., at about 10:00 a.m. EST on Sunday with a single refueling stopover planned at Sheppard AFB, Texas. If weather permits, arrival of the aircraft at KSC's Shuttle Landing Facility should be about 4:30 p.m. EST. Status updates regarding the cross-country flight will be made on KSC's codaphone over the weekend. This can be reached by calling 407/867-2525. Public Affairs officers will be in the KSC Press Site office by 9:30 a.m. Sunday in order to provide status updates by phone. The office, however, will not officially open until it is deter- mined the aircraft will in fact be arriving at KSC. If it is determined that the aircraft will be successful in completing the day-long trip to KSC on Sunday, the office will officially open at 3:00 p.m. In that event, media interested in viewing the B-52/Pegasus arrival should plan on calling the KSC news center at 407/867-2468 for departure times to the Shuttle Landing Facility. News media who do not possess current credentials must con- tact the Public Information Office before close of business Friday, Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Coast Regional Airport Statutes Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Truck at Space Coast Regional Airport
    News from the Florida Department of Transportation Aviation and Spaceports Office Florida Flyer www.dot.state.fl.us/aviation Fall 2015 INSIDE 3 Zoning Requirements Revisited Greg Jones discusses airport zoning requirements noted in Chapter 333 of the Florida Courtesy of Space Coast Regional Airport Statutes Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting truck at Space Coast Regional Airport. 6 Space Coast 2015 Florida Aviation Awards Regional Airport Brian Blanchard and Andy by Michael D. Powell, C.M., ACE Keith announced the winners at the Florida Airports pace Coast Regional Airport (TIX) Two runways Council Conference Sis located five miles south of Titus- Space Coast Regional Airport has ville on Florida’s Space Coast. The air- two intersecting runways. The primary port is a corporate and charter aviation runway, 18/36, is 7,320 feet long and 150 facility offering turbo-engine mainte- feet wide, and is presently marked with 8 nance and repair, aircraft sales, and two a displaced threshold of 319 feet. This full-service FBOs. Space Coast Region- runway can accommodate small general Shuttle Landing al Airport is the closest airport to Ken- aviation, business/corporate, and com- Facility Turned Over nedy Space Center, and it has easy ac- mercial service aircraft. The airport has cess to I-95, the Beachline (528), U.S. 1, an instrument landing system (ILS) lo- to Space Florida and the beaches of Cape Canaveral and calizer approach to Runway 36. The sec- Cocoa Beach. The facility will be used ondary runway, 09/27, is 5,000 feet long Space Coast Regional Airport is and 100 feet wide and can accommo- as a testing ground for new owned and managed by the Titusville- date both single-wheel and dual-wheel technologies and companies Cocoa Airport Authority, and it serves general aviation aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbiter Processing Facility
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Shuttle: Orbiter Processing From Landing To Launch he work of preparing a space shuttle for the same facilities. Inside is a description of an flight takes place primarily at the Launch orbiter processing flow; in this case, Discovery. Complex 39 Area. TThe process actually begins at the end of each acts Shuttle Landing Facility flight, with a landing at the center or, after landing At the end of its mission, the Space Shuttle f at an alternate site, the return of the orbiter atop a Discovery lands at the Shuttle Landing Facility on shuttle carrier aircraft. Kennedy’s Shuttle Landing one of two runway headings – Runway 15 extends Facility is the primary landing site. from the northwest to the southeast, and Runway There are now three orbiters in the shuttle 33 extends from the southeast to the northwest fleet: Discovery, Atlantis and Endeavour. Chal- – based on wind currents. lenger was destroyed in an accident in January After touchdown and wheelstop, the orbiter 1986. Columbia was lost during approach to land- convoy is deployed to the runway. The convoy ing in February 2003. consists of about 25 specially designed vehicles or Each orbiter is processed independently using units and a team of about 150 trained personnel, NASA some of whom assist the crew in disembarking from the orbiter. the orbiter and a “white room” is mated to the orbiter hatch. The The others quickly begin the processes necessary to “safe” the hatch is opened and a physician performs a brief preliminary orbiter and prepare it for towing to the Orbiter Processing Fa- medical examination of the crew members before they leave the cility.
    [Show full text]
  • Texture Modification of the Shuttle Landing Facility Runway at Kennedy Space Center
    NASA Technical Paper 3626 Texture Modification of the Shuttle Landing Facility Runway at Kennedy Space Center Robert H. Daugherty and Thomas J. Yager Langley Research Center • Hampton, Virginia National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center • Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 May 1997 The use of trademarks or names of manufacturers in this report is for accurate reporting and does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, of such products or manufacturers by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Available electronically at the following URL address: http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ltrs/ltrs.html Printed copies available from the following: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information National Technical Information Service (NTIS) 800 Elkridge Landing Road 5285 Port Royal Road Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934 Springfield, VA 22161-2171 (301) 621-0390 (703) 487-4650 Abbreviations: ALDF Aircraft Landing Dynamics Facility ATD average texture depth BPT British Pendulum Tester CAT Computerized Axial Tomography ITTV Instrumented Tire-Test Vehicle KSC Kennedy Space Center LG longitudinally grooved LSRA Landing-Systems Research Aircraft RTLS return-to-launch site SLF Shuttle Landing Facility STS Space Transportation System TG transversely grooved +++ !!! Summary margin for errors in the final approach for landing or for anomalies during the landing rollout. The KSC SLF in This paper describes the test procedures and the cri- Florida has a unique runway that was constructed in the teria used in selecting an effective runway-surface- mid-1970's that is approximately 5 mi from the Shuttle texture modification at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) launch pads and provides the STS program with the Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) to reduce Orbiter tire capability to land safely in the event of an RTLS or poor wear.
    [Show full text]
  • UFC 3-400-02 Design: Engineering Weather Data
    UFC 3-400-02 20 September 2018 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DESIGN: ENGINEERING WEATHER DATA APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED UFC 3-400-02 20 September 2018 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DESIGN: ENGINEERING WEATHER DATA Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use. Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder. Indicate the preparing activity beside the Service responsible for preparing the document. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity) AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/) Change No. Date Location This UFC supersedes UFC 3-400-02, dated February 2003. UFC 3-400-02 20 September 2018 FOREWORD The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the most stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable. UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Washington State Aviation System Plan
    2016 Washington State Aviation System Plan March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – Overview ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Overview of 2015 WASP .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Aviation System Performance .................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Prior WSDOT Aviation Planning Studies ................................................................................. 1-3 1.3.1 2009 Long-Term Air Transportation Study ................................................................. 1-3 1.3.2 2012 Aviation Economic Impact Study ........................................................................ 1-4 1.3.3 2013 (and prior) Airport Pavement Management System ........................................... 1-4 1.3.4 2014 Airport Investment Study ................................................................................... 1-5 1.4 Report Layout ......................................................................................................................... 1-5 Chapter 2 – Goals, Objectives, and System Performance Measures ............................................. 2-1 2.1 Process ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6. Transportation September 14
    1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2 APPENDIX 6 3 TRANSPORTATION 4 October 10, 2016 02/10/2020 5 06/30/2020 09/14/2020 6 7 1 APPENDIX 6 2 TRANSPORTATION 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 Section Page 5 I. TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES INVENTORY AND LOS ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 1 6 A. Air Transportation ...................................................................................................................................... 1 7 1. Inventory of Existing Facilities and Services .............................................................................................. 3 8 2. Long-Range Planning Needs Demand/Capacity ........................................................................................ 4 9 3. Demand/Capacity Analysis Long Range Transportation Planning Recommendations ............................. 6 10 B. Marine Transportation ............................................................................................................................... 6 11 1. Washington State Ferry System ................................................................................................................ 7 12 2. Passenger Ferries ..................................................................................................................................... 15 13 3. County Marine Facilities .......................................................................................................................... 16 14 4. Barges and Landing Craft ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE AVIATION Economic Impact Study 3 2 5 7 1 4 6 Technical Report 2019 Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Study Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Communicating Results ................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Florida’s Airports ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Study Conventions ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.5.1 Study Terminology .............................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Report Organization .................................................................................................................... 12 2. Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 FDOT District Results ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WAAS PAN Report (January 2021)
    Satellite Navigation Branch, ANG-E66 NSTB/WAAS T&E Team WIDE AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT January 2021 Report #75 Reporting Period: October 01 to December 31, 2020 http://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405 WAAS Performance Analysis Report January 2021 DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL VERSION DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE DATE 0.1 Initial Version of Document 01/27/2021 0.2 Technical Edit 01/28/2021 0.3 Peer Review 02/05/2021 1.0 Final Report 02/10/2021 Report 75 ii WAAS Performance Analysis Report January 2021 Executive Summary Since 1999, the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Test Team at the FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center has reported GPS performance as measured against the GPS Standard Positioning Service (SPS) Signal Specification in quarterly GPS Performance Analysis Network (PAN) Reports. In addition to the GPS PAN reports, the WAAS Test Team has provided quarterly reports on WAAS performance. The current WAAS PAN Report #75 provides WAAS performance data from the October 01 through December 31, 2020 reporting period. This report provides the following results: accuracy, availability, coverage, safety index, range accuracy, WAAS broadcast message rates, geostationary satellite ranging availability, WAAS airport availability, WAAS Code Noise and Multipath analysis, WAAS reference station survey validation, and WAAS Signal Quality Monitoring. The following table shows observations for accuracy and availability made during the reporting period for Continental United States (CONUS) and Alaska sites (the international sites are presented in the body of this report). Localizer Performance (LP) service is available when the calculated horizontal protection level (HPL) is less than 40 meters.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Version June/July 2016
    IDWEST FLYER M AGAZINE JUNE/JULY 2016 Published For & By The Midwest Aviation Community Since 1978 midwestflyer.com Finding a fi x for TFRs Just about anyone who has planned a fl ight in or near a major metro area has had to worry about temporary fl ight restrictions (TFRs) at one time or another. Scrolling through dozens, even hundreds, of NOTAMs to identify TFRs that are relevant to your fl ight can be daunting. The sheer number can make it easy to miss something. But when you have access to good graphics, you can instantly see if a TFR will a ect your fl ight. Unfortunately, graphics aren’t available for every TFR. And when graphics are unavailable or are inaccurate, the number of violations goes way up. That’s why AOPA will be helping to lead an e ort to improve TFR graphics, from how the information is delivered to how it is depicted. Back in 2015, we started asking questions about the scope and extent of problems we were seeing with TFRs that either had no graphics or, maybe worse, showed incorrect graphics. After uncovering recurring issues, we asked the FAA to provide an authoritative online source of TFR information, provide TFR information in a consistent format so that automated systems used by third-party vendors can translate it into accurate graphics, and work to make the text of TFR NOTAMs more user friendly for pilots. This April, the FAA responded by formally tasking the RTCA Tactical Operations Committee to address the issues we raised and report back with recommendations within six months.
    [Show full text]