DOCSLIB.ORG

Space Coast Regional Airport Statutes Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Truck at Space Coast Regional Airport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Space Coast Regional Airport Statutes Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Truck at Space Coast Regional Airport News from the Florida Department of Transportation Aviation and Spaceports Office Florida Flyer www.dot.state.fl.us/aviation Fall 2015 INSIDE 3 Zoning Requirements Revisited Greg Jones discusses airport zoning requirements noted in Chapter 333 of the Florida Courtesy of Space Coast Regional Airport Statutes Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting truck at Space Coast Regional Airport. 6 Space Coast 2015 Florida Aviation Awards Regional Airport Brian Blanchard and Andy by Michael D. Powell, C.M., ACE Keith announced the winners at the Florida Airports pace Coast Regional Airport (TIX) Two runways Council Conference Sis located five miles south of Titus- Space Coast Regional Airport has ville on Florida’s Space Coast. The air- two intersecting runways. The primary port is a corporate and charter aviation runway, 18/36, is 7,320 feet long and 150 facility offering turbo-engine mainte- feet wide, and is presently marked with 8 nance and repair, aircraft sales, and two a displaced threshold of 319 feet. This full-service FBOs. Space Coast Region- runway can accommodate small general Shuttle Landing al Airport is the closest airport to Ken- aviation, business/corporate, and com- Facility Turned Over nedy Space Center, and it has easy ac- mercial service aircraft. The airport has cess to I-95, the Beachline (528), U.S. 1, an instrument landing system (ILS) lo- to Space Florida and the beaches of Cape Canaveral and calizer approach to Runway 36. The sec- Cocoa Beach. The facility will be used ondary runway, 09/27, is 5,000 feet long Space Coast Regional Airport is and 100 feet wide and can accommo- as a testing ground for new owned and managed by the Titusville- date both single-wheel and dual-wheel technologies and companies Cocoa Airport Authority, and it serves general aviation aircraft. Currently, six Titusville, Cocoa, and the Space Coast in Brevard County. See Space Coast, page 4 MANAGER’S CORNER The 2015/2016 Florida Department of Transportation budget was signed into law by Governor Scott on Tuesday, June 23, 2015. The budget, totaling $10 billion, includes a $9.1 billion work program and funds a variety of projects, including space- port infrastructure and highway beautification. Of the more than $9 billion in the work program, the aviation program received a budget of $365 million, including ap- proximately $30 million for spaceport development. The appropriations again reflect a significant state investment in Florida’s robust and ever-evolving system of aviation and aerospace transportation infrastructure. Aaron N. Smith State Aviation Manager There were five special appropriations included in the Aviation Development Appropriation Bill passed by the Senate. Four airport specific appropriations were vetoed. The fifth special appropriation was $10 million for Space Florida. The net result was, more or less, a break even. “The appropriations To put the Fiscal Year 2016 aviation budget in perspective, here are the totals for again reflect a Fiscal Year 2011 to Fiscal Year 2015: significant state FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 investment in $120M $184M $174M $180M $320M Florida’s robust The increase in aviation program funding in Fiscal Year 2015 resulted from state and ever-evolving investment in both Orlando International Airport and Tampa International Airport capacity improvement projects, which continue with the current budget. Fort Lauder- system of aviation dale–Hollywood International Airport’s new parallel runway was a significant ac- complishment and required significant investment, receiving well over $100 million and aerospace over multiple fiscal years. transportation Fact: The Florida Department of Transportation is the only state agency that oper- ates on a “cash flow” basis; that is, for most transportation projects in Florida, the De- infrastructure.” partment begins design and construction before the total amount of cash is available to fund the project. The Department anticipates that future revenues will be available to finance current projects. The Department is not required to have funds “on hand” to cover all existing contractual obligations, and it may let contracts against revenue it expects to receive in the future. In order to manage the Department’s available cash in the future, the Department is required by law to forecast its future expenditures, obligations, and revenue. Please note that the July 1 aviation adopted work program snapshots are posted at www.dot.state.fl.us/aviation/workProgram.shtm. FLORIDA FLYER 2 Fall 2015 Zoning Requirements Revisited by Greg Jones s the new Airspace and Land Use for emphasis. zoning regulations in compliance with AManager for the Florida Depart- In F.S. 333.02(1), the legislature de- F.S. 333.03 and such regulations are not ment of Transportation (FDOT), I have clares in strongly worded language that on file with the FDOT, then the FDOT had the opportunity to participate in the “an airport hazard endangers the lives has height zoning authorization for the review and drafting of proposed revi- and property of users of the airport and proposed construction. sions to Florida Statute (F.S.) 333, Air- of occupants of land in its vicinity . port Zoning. As you may know, this was are public nuisances and . in the in- Details from F.S. 333.03 a collaborative effort with many dif- terest of the public health, public safety, F.S. 333.03 addresses the require- ferent stakeholders. Unfortunately, the and general welfare . be prevented ment of political subdivisions to adopt, bill providing for revision of the statute . to the extent legally possible, by the administer, and enforce adequate air- failed to pass prior to final adjournment exercise of the police power, without port zoning regulations: of the legislature. It is anticipated that compensation.” F.S. 333.03(1)(a) provides that every a revised bill will be resubmitted to the political subdivision having an airport 2016 Legislature. As a result, we are still Important requirements hazard area within its territorial limits working with the existing statute. To accomplish this vital goal, the shall by 1977, adopt, administer, and legislature provides in F.S. 333 the fol- enforce, under the police power and in Provisions to note lowing requirements: the manner and upon the conditions pre- The effort to revise the statute F.S. 333.025(1): To prevent the scribed in F.S. 333.03 for such airport brought to light several provisions of erection of structures dangerous to air hazard area. the statute which airport owners and navigation . each person shall secure F.S. 333.03(b) addresses the situa- zoning authorities should take note of from the Department of Transportation tion where the airport is owned or con- and ensure compliance with the statute. a permit for the erection, alteration, or trolled by a political subdivision and the Although the proposed revised statute modification of any structure . which airport hazard area is within the terri- provides for clarification and consolida- would exceed the federal obstruction torial limits of a different political sub- tion of certain permitting provisions, the standards as contained in 14 C.F.R. ss. division: In such case the two political permitting requirements will essentially 77.21, 77.23, 77.25, 77.28, and 77.29. subdivisions shall either: remain the same but in many instances However, there are exemptions to 1. “By interlocal agreement . require more complete compliance. this requirement: adopt, administer, and enforce airport This is of significance to the obligation F.S. 333.025(1): However, permits zoning regulations applicable to the air- of political subdivisions to “adopt, ad- from the Department of Transportation port hazard area in question; or” minister, and enforce . airport zoning will be required only within an airport 2. “By ordinance or resolution duly regulations for such airport hazard area hazard area where federal standards are adopted, create a joint airport zoning [any area of land or water upon which an exceeded and if the proposed construc- board, which board shall have the same airport hazard might be established].” tion is within a 10 nautical-mile radius power to adopt, administer, and enforce “Airport hazard” means any structure of the geographical center of a publicly airport zoning regulations applicable to or tree or use of land which exceeds the owned or operated airport, a military the airport hazard area in question.” federal obstruction standards contained airport, or an airport licensed by the F.S. 333.03(c) then specifies what in 14 C.F.R, Part 77, Subpart C, Stan- state for public use. the airport zoning regulations should dards for Determining Obstructions to F.S. 333.025(4): When political require as a minimum. Air Navigation or Navigational Aids or subdivisions have adopted adequate For those not familiar with F.S. 333, Facilities, sections 77.21, 77.23, 77.25, airspace protection in compliance with it includes sections regarding the pro- 77.28, and 77.29, which creates a hazard F.S. 333.03 and such regulations are on cedure for adoption of zoning regula- to air navigation. file with the Department of Transporta- tions, airport zoning requirements, In 2011, the Federal Aviation Ad- tion, a permit for such structures shall procedures for permits and variances, ministration (FAA) amended Part 77, not be required from the Department of appeals, administration of airport zon- Subpart C, renumbering and rewording Transportation. ing regulations, boards of adjustment, the paragraphs but essentially retain- Considering the requirements judicial review, acquisition of air rights, ing the same standards. The existing above, it could be argued by an appli- and enforcement and remedies. F.S. 333 references the pre-2011 Part 77, cant that if the proposed construction It should be noted that F.S. 333.13 Subpart C numbering and wording. The exceeds federal obstruction standards provides that every violation of this proposed revision to F.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1993 (179Kb Pdf)
    February 4, 1993 KSC Contact: Bruce Buckingham KSC Release No. 10-93 Notice To Editors/News Directors: KSC NEWS CENTER OFFICE HOURS FOR PEGASUS ARRIVAL The NASA B-52 aircraft carrying the Orbital Sciences Cor- poration Pegasus rocket is scheduled to arrive at KSC on Sunday, Feb. 7, with launch targeted for Feb. 9. The aircraft is currently scheduled to depart Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., at about 10:00 a.m. EST on Sunday with a single refueling stopover planned at Sheppard AFB, Texas. If weather permits, arrival of the aircraft at KSC's Shuttle Landing Facility should be about 4:30 p.m. EST. Status updates regarding the cross-country flight will be made on KSC's codaphone over the weekend. This can be reached by calling 407/867-2525. Public Affairs officers will be in the KSC Press Site office by 9:30 a.m. Sunday in order to provide status updates by phone. The office, however, will not officially open until it is deter- mined the aircraft will in fact be arriving at KSC. If it is determined that the aircraft will be successful in completing the day-long trip to KSC on Sunday, the office will officially open at 3:00 p.m. In that event, media interested in viewing the B-52/Pegasus arrival should plan on calling the KSC news center at 407/867-2468 for departure times to the Shuttle Landing Facility. News media who do not possess current credentials must con- tact the Public Information Office before close of business Friday, Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbiter Processing Facility
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Shuttle: Orbiter Processing From Landing To Launch he work of preparing a space shuttle for the same facilities. Inside is a description of an flight takes place primarily at the Launch orbiter processing flow; in this case, Discovery. Complex 39 Area. TThe process actually begins at the end of each acts Shuttle Landing Facility flight, with a landing at the center or, after landing At the end of its mission, the Space Shuttle f at an alternate site, the return of the orbiter atop a Discovery lands at the Shuttle Landing Facility on shuttle carrier aircraft. Kennedy’s Shuttle Landing one of two runway headings – Runway 15 extends Facility is the primary landing site. from the northwest to the southeast, and Runway There are now three orbiters in the shuttle 33 extends from the southeast to the northwest fleet: Discovery, Atlantis and Endeavour. Chal- – based on wind currents. lenger was destroyed in an accident in January After touchdown and wheelstop, the orbiter 1986. Columbia was lost during approach to land- convoy is deployed to the runway. The convoy ing in February 2003. consists of about 25 specially designed vehicles or Each orbiter is processed independently using units and a team of about 150 trained personnel, NASA some of whom assist the crew in disembarking from the orbiter. the orbiter and a “white room” is mated to the orbiter hatch. The The others quickly begin the processes necessary to “safe” the hatch is opened and a physician performs a brief preliminary orbiter and prepare it for towing to the Orbiter Processing Fa- medical examination of the crew members before they leave the cility.
    [Show full text]
  • Texture Modification of the Shuttle Landing Facility Runway at Kennedy Space Center
    NASA Technical Paper 3626 Texture Modification of the Shuttle Landing Facility Runway at Kennedy Space Center Robert H. Daugherty and Thomas J. Yager Langley Research Center • Hampton, Virginia National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center • Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 May 1997 The use of trademarks or names of manufacturers in this report is for accurate reporting and does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, of such products or manufacturers by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Available electronically at the following URL address: http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ltrs/ltrs.html Printed copies available from the following: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information National Technical Information Service (NTIS) 800 Elkridge Landing Road 5285 Port Royal Road Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934 Springfield, VA 22161-2171 (301) 621-0390 (703) 487-4650 Abbreviations: ALDF Aircraft Landing Dynamics Facility ATD average texture depth BPT British Pendulum Tester CAT Computerized Axial Tomography ITTV Instrumented Tire-Test Vehicle KSC Kennedy Space Center LG longitudinally grooved LSRA Landing-Systems Research Aircraft RTLS return-to-launch site SLF Shuttle Landing Facility STS Space Transportation System TG transversely grooved +++ !!! Summary margin for errors in the final approach for landing or for anomalies during the landing rollout. The KSC SLF in This paper describes the test procedures and the cri- Florida has a unique runway that was constructed in the teria used in selecting an effective runway-surface- mid-1970's that is approximately 5 mi from the Shuttle texture modification at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) launch pads and provides the STS program with the Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) to reduce Orbiter tire capability to land safely in the event of an RTLS or poor wear.
    [Show full text]
  • UFC 3-400-02 Design: Engineering Weather Data
    UFC 3-400-02 20 September 2018 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DESIGN: ENGINEERING WEATHER DATA APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED UFC 3-400-02 20 September 2018 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DESIGN: ENGINEERING WEATHER DATA Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use. Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder. Indicate the preparing activity beside the Service responsible for preparing the document. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity) AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/) Change No. Date Location This UFC supersedes UFC 3-400-02, dated February 2003. UFC 3-400-02 20 September 2018 FOREWORD The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the most stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable. UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction.
    [Show full text]
  • AAAE Delivers for Airport Executives
    AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES MEDIAKIT 1 Industry Friends and Colleagues: As we prepare for 2010, Airport Magazine is developing articles that will address industry concerns about the nation’s economic recovery; share lessons learned from the recession and the price of fuel and its impact on air service; provide timely information on regulatory and legislative issues; fulfill the far-ranging needs of airports for training information; describe the lessons airports have learned on subjects that include ARFF, technology and airfield and terminal improvements; and much more. Every feature and department in Airport Magazine is designed to deliver relevant, timely and insightful information to our readers. We have crafted our 2010 editorial calendar with these goals in mind. The 2010 lineup combines familiar topics — such as baggage screening, concessions and winter operations — with emerging ones that include NextGen and green airports. Our format will be as varied as our selection of articles: we’ll have roundtables with industry experts; articles written by airport officials; interviews with government and industry officials; and photo features to highlight aspects of our industry. Our ambitious plans for 2010 would not be possible, however, without the faithful support of Airport Magazine’s advertisers. For more than 20 years, companies that advertise to the airport community have trusted Airport Magazine to deliver their message to this audience. For potential advertisers, please consider this: by choosing our magazine to communicate your message, you are supporting not just an advertiser-funded magazine, but an entire association — the American Association of Airport Executives. All of us at Airport Magazine look forward to working with you in 2010 and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE AVIATION Economic Impact Study 3 2 5 7 1 4 6 Technical Report 2019 Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Study Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Communicating Results ................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Florida’s Airports ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Study Conventions ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.5.1 Study Terminology .............................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Report Organization .................................................................................................................... 12 2. Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 FDOT District Results ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WAAS PAN Report (January 2021)
    Satellite Navigation Branch, ANG-E66 NSTB/WAAS T&E Team WIDE AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT January 2021 Report #75 Reporting Period: October 01 to December 31, 2020 http://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405 WAAS Performance Analysis Report January 2021 DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL VERSION DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE DATE 0.1 Initial Version of Document 01/27/2021 0.2 Technical Edit 01/28/2021 0.3 Peer Review 02/05/2021 1.0 Final Report 02/10/2021 Report 75 ii WAAS Performance Analysis Report January 2021 Executive Summary Since 1999, the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Test Team at the FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center has reported GPS performance as measured against the GPS Standard Positioning Service (SPS) Signal Specification in quarterly GPS Performance Analysis Network (PAN) Reports. In addition to the GPS PAN reports, the WAAS Test Team has provided quarterly reports on WAAS performance. The current WAAS PAN Report #75 provides WAAS performance data from the October 01 through December 31, 2020 reporting period. This report provides the following results: accuracy, availability, coverage, safety index, range accuracy, WAAS broadcast message rates, geostationary satellite ranging availability, WAAS airport availability, WAAS Code Noise and Multipath analysis, WAAS reference station survey validation, and WAAS Signal Quality Monitoring. The following table shows observations for accuracy and availability made during the reporting period for Continental United States (CONUS) and Alaska sites (the international sites are presented in the body of this report). Localizer Performance (LP) service is available when the calculated horizontal protection level (HPL) is less than 40 meters.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Version June/July 2016
    IDWEST FLYER M AGAZINE JUNE/JULY 2016 Published For & By The Midwest Aviation Community Since 1978 midwestflyer.com Finding a fi x for TFRs Just about anyone who has planned a fl ight in or near a major metro area has had to worry about temporary fl ight restrictions (TFRs) at one time or another. Scrolling through dozens, even hundreds, of NOTAMs to identify TFRs that are relevant to your fl ight can be daunting. The sheer number can make it easy to miss something. But when you have access to good graphics, you can instantly see if a TFR will a ect your fl ight. Unfortunately, graphics aren’t available for every TFR. And when graphics are unavailable or are inaccurate, the number of violations goes way up. That’s why AOPA will be helping to lead an e ort to improve TFR graphics, from how the information is delivered to how it is depicted. Back in 2015, we started asking questions about the scope and extent of problems we were seeing with TFRs that either had no graphics or, maybe worse, showed incorrect graphics. After uncovering recurring issues, we asked the FAA to provide an authoritative online source of TFR information, provide TFR information in a consistent format so that automated systems used by third-party vendors can translate it into accurate graphics, and work to make the text of TFR NOTAMs more user friendly for pilots. This April, the FAA responded by formally tasking the RTCA Tactical Operations Committee to address the issues we raised and report back with recommendations within six months.
    [Show full text]
  • Cecil Spaceport Master Plan 2012
    March 2012 Jacksonville Aviation Authority Cecil Spaceport Master Plan Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Project Background ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 History of Spaceport Activities ........................................................................................ 1-3 1.3 Purpose of the Master Plan ............................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Strategic Vision .............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.5 Market Analysis .............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.6 Competitor Analysis ....................................................................................................... 1-6 1.7 Operating and Development Plan................................................................................... 1-8 1.8 Implementation Plan .................................................................................................... 1-10 1.8.1 Phasing Plan ......................................................................................................... 1-10 1.8.2 Funding Alternatives ............................................................................................. 1-11 CHAPTER 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Minutes CFASPP STATEWIDE STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING April 16, 2009, 1:00 PM Orlando International Airport
    Meeting Minutes CFASPP STATEWIDE STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING April 16, 2009, 1:00 PM Orlando International Airport 1. Call To Order / Introductions –-Chair Chip Seymour called the meeting to order at 1:02 p.m. and asked all in attendance to introduce themselves. Name Region Representing______________ Chip Seymour, Chair Statewide Chair Jacksonville Aviation Authority Greg Donovan Northwest Chair Okaloosa County Airports Tom Sawyer North Central Chair Lake City Municipal Airport Todd Lindner Northeast Chair Jacksonville Aviation Authority Kevin McNamara East Central Chair Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Don Silvernell West Central V-Chair Hernando County Airport Fred Watts Southwest Chair Venice Municipal Airport Diana Lewis Treasure Coast V-Chair St. Lucie County International Airport Steve Rocco Southeast V-Chair Pompano Beach Airpark Other Airports Represented Mike Iguina North Central Gainesville Regional Airport Quincy Wylupek North Central Citrus County Airports John Youell Northeast Palatka Municipal – LT Kay Larkin Field Terry Lloyd East Central Kissimmee Gateway Airport Mikko Huttunen East Central Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Jim Sheppard East Central Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Steve Borowski East Central Valkaria Airport Ed Dingley East Central Valkaria Airport Karina Delerme East Central Daytona Beach International Airport Karen Feaster East Central Daytona Beach International Airport Carl Schweizer East Central Daytona Beach International Airport Roy Sieger East Central Flagler County Airport Steve Lichliter
    [Show full text]
  • Fellow Aviators and Controllers, with the Flyout of the Shuttle Program at KSC Came Significant Changes in Operating Hours, Airs
    Fellow Aviators and Controllers, With the flyout of the Shuttle Program at KSC came significant changes in operating hours, airspace, and accessibility to the airspace around the Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF), ICAO Identifier KTTS. This email is intended to bring you up to speed on the current conditions and serve as the initial step in what I hope will become a working channel for communicating any changes to the status or passing other important information to those of you who fly or control aircraft in this area. Operating Hours: The air traffic control tower at the SLF (call sign “NASA Tower” on VHF 128.55) is now only operational from 0800 – 1700L, Monday through Friday and at other times only when significant activity might warrant its operation. Obviously, the airspace around the SLF Runway is Class D airspace when the tower is operational, but it is Class G airspace (uncontrolled) during periods when the tower is closed. For clarification, there is another facility, the Military Radar Unit (MRU), call sign “Cape Control” on VHF 133.8 which is manned by air traffic controllers, but whose function is not control of aircraft. The MRU’s hours of operation are significantly greater than those of the Tower, but their function is to monitor the airspace controlled by the Eastern Range, including any activated Restricted Airspace. Restricted Airspace: Restricted Area R-2932, which protects non- participating aircraft from hazardous operations on Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS) and much of Kennedy Space Center (KSC) remains active 24 hours per day up to 4999 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Packet
    REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS On-Call General Engineering Consultant Services City of Naples Airport Authority 160 Aviation Drive North Naples, FL 34104 RFQ Issue Date: January 11, 2019 RFQ Submittal Date: February 11, 2019 1 On-Call GEC RFQ 686773.1 12/26/2018 ADVERTISEMENT Request for Qualifications January 11, 2019 On Call General Engineering Consultant In accordance with Florida Statute 287.055, Title 49, United States Code, section 47105(d), Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 18, and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5100-14e, the City of Naples Airport Authority (NAA) invites the submission of Letters of Interest and Statements of Qualifications from all interested and qualified parties with demonstrated expertise in ON CALL GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES at Naples Airport. A copy of the detailed Request for Qualifications and instructions for submittal may be obtained from the Naples Airport Authority online at https://flynaples.com/doing-business-with-the-authority/open-bids/ beginning January 10, 2019. Responses are due no later than 2:00 p.m., February 11, 2019. The NAA reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and to waive any formalities or irregularities in the best interest of the Authority and is not liable for any costs incurred by the responding parties. All Respondents must be licensed in accordance with Florida Laws. The Authority recognizes fair and open competition as a basic tenet of public procurement. Respondents doing business with the Authority are prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, handicap, age or sex. The NAA has a progressive Disadvantaged, Minority, and Women-Owned Business Enterprises Program in place and encourages Disadvantaged, Minority, and Women-Owned Business Enterprises to participate in its RFQ process.
    [Show full text]