The Bulletin 60 YEARS of SUBWAY SERVICE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Bulletin 60 YEARS of SUBWAY SERVICE ERA BULLETIN — JULY, 2016 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 59, No. 7 July, 2016 The Bulletin 60 YEARS OF SUBWAY SERVICE Published by the Electric TO THE ROCKAWAYS Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box by Bernard Linder 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. June 28, 1956 was an important day. Sub- day express running time is about 99 way trains started operating to the Rocka- minutes, but midnight locals take a little long- For general inquiries, ways. The first trains were the 6:38 PM er — 112 minutes. th contact us at bulletin@ Rockaway Park and the 6:48 PM B. 25 Long Island Rail Road trains were providing erausa.org. ERA’s Street-Wavecrest trains from Euclid Avenue. service to the Rockaways long before sub- website is Rockaway riders were able to enjoy more way service was extended there. Unfortu- www.erausa.org. frequent service and a cheaper ride than the nately, the railroad trains operated on a Editorial Staff: Long Island Rail Road previously provided. wooden trestle where fires occurred fre- Editor-in-Chief: But passengers from the mainland leaving quently. On May 7, 1950, another fire de- Bernard Linder Rockaway stations paid an additional fare stroyed this trestle and the railroad was una- Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor: and passengers boarding at Rockaway sta- ble to spend large sums of money to repair it. Ronald Yee tions paid two fares for trips beyond the sec- To provide service on this busy route, the North American and World ond zone. For trips within the second zone, City of New York decided to buy it. On June News Editor: passengers paid two fares, received an iden- 11, 1952, the Rockaway Line was sold to the Alexander Ivanoff tification ticket, and got a refund when leav- city for $8.5 million, and the portions still op- Contributing Editor: Jeffrey Erlitz ing. erated by the Long Island Rail Road were Because of a delay in delivering equipment, leased back to it. Production Manager: power was inadequate and trains operated in During the transition period, LIRR service David Ross series for 3.70 miles between Howard Beach was curtailed. Service to Hamilton Beach and Broad Channel. The original running was reduced after the trestle fire, after which ©2016 Elect ric time from Euclid Avenue was 44 minutes to trains terminated at Ozone Park from Octo- th Railroaders ’ B. 25 Street and 40 minutes to Rockaway ber 2, 1955 to June 8, 1962. Pursuant to the Association, Park. Less than a month later, July 22, 1956, lease with the City of New York, LIRR operat- Incorporate d sufficient power was available and running ed service over the city-owned portion be- time was speeded up eight minutes. tween Ozone Park and White Pot Junction. During the summer, rush hour E trains op- The lease was renewed in 1956 and 1959, erated from 179th Street to B. 25th Street (6 and expired June 10, 1962. LIRR discontin- In This Issue: trains) and Rockaway Park (6 trains). At oth- ued operation and the property reverted to From er times 4-car shuttles operated from Euclid the City of New York. After the trestle fire, Recognition to Avenue to both terminals. Effective Septem- LIRR trains were rerouted via Valley Stream ber 16, 1956, A trains ran between 207th to Far Rockaway and Rockaway Park. Ser- Dominance— Street and B. 25th Street except during the vice was reduced again on October 2, 1955 The New York midnight hours, when shuttles still operated and all trains terminated at Far Rockaway. Connecting to Euclid Avenue. Six rush hour A trains ran NYC Transit replaced the burned wooden Railroad between 207th Street and Rockaway Park trestle with an embankment built of sand while shuttles ran to Euclid Avenue at other dredged from Jamaica Bay, upon which (Continued) th tracks were supported by steel and concrete …Page 2 times. A trains operating between 207 Street and Far Rockaway furnish the longest pilings. A new signal system was installed, ride on the transit system, 32.29 miles. Mid- (Continued on page 4) NEXT TRIP: WEEKEND TRIP TO ROCHESTER/CLEVELAND/BUFFALO1 — OCTOBER 15-17 NEW YORKERA DIVISION BULLETIN BULLETIN — JULY, OCTOBER, 2016 2000 FROM RECOGNITION TO DOMINANCE: THE NEW YORK CONNECTING RAILROAD (BRIDGING THE BAY AND CONNECTING THE PIECES) by George Chiasson (Continued from June, 2016 issue) LIRR ON THE CULVER LINE, RELATIONSHIP enter the Bay Ridge Branch, cross above the Brighton WITH THE BAY RIDGE BRANCH, AND OTHER Beach Railroad, and proceed onto the Manhattan RAPID TRANSIT VENTURES Beach Branch for their final leg to the shore and its rich- The undeniable mobility movement toward trolleys ness of attractions. This special service was offered in and elevated trains in the rapidly developing city of addition to LIRR’s trains between Bay Ridge and Coney Brooklyn eventually drew the Prospect Park & Coney Island, and the Gravesend racing specials out of Long Island to a closer affiliation with Long Island Rail Road Island City, each of which had been using the Culver through the 1890s, with its outright purchase being con- Line south of Parkville Junction since 1885 and 1886. It summated on January 24, 1893. Culver’s former com- was taken seriously enough to generate the creation of pany had already been operating a healthy chunk of its a substantial railroad terminal at Manhattan Beach it- service into the “Union Depot” at 36th Street & 5th Ave- self. For whatever reason (we might speculate that nue for some time, being readily supplied with passen- Corbin’s preferred clientele didn’t respond to the availa- gers that transferred from the Fifth Avenue “L” above bility of through service over the elevated system as he since June 7, 1890. For its first two years (until July 14, had hoped) this particular routing nevertheless turned 1892) this service was operated in equal partnership out to be a single-season affair upon its conclusion on with trains of the Brooklyn, Bath & West End Railroad, October 30, with similar, jointly-operated trains consist- but after being financially wooed by the South Brooklyn ing of BER equipment and crews sticking to the Culver Railroad and Terminal, the cohort company traded inter- Line for their whole trip to Coney Island beginning with est in the Union Depot for a separate deal to run about the 1896 season that May. This was Corbin’s final act half of its trains into the adjacent 39th Street Ferry, as far as coordinated service between the Brooklyn “L”s which had seen little use for several years. From there and LIRR was concerned, for he died in an unfortunate patrons could access boats that steamed directly to and accident on June 4. The schedule of existing seasonal from Lower Manhattan instead of being required to navi- specials then stayed the course through the summer of gate the dawdling, uncomfortable “L” system before and 1897, but by that time the Brooklyn traction empire was after each trip. This indeed proved to be a more attrac- in an optimal stage of development and without Corbin tive alternative and all remaining West End operations to harness it in a fashion directed toward the benefit of (by then operated entirely with electric streetcars) vacat- his own interests, LIRR’s newer, younger management ed Union Depot in favor of the 39th Street facility on (guided by another New Englander, successor Presi- June 29, 1895. dent William H. Baldwin) seemed inclined to acquiesce Meanwhile, Corbin was infatuated with the potential to the competitive realities and let LIRR withdraw from line-haul utility that the “L”s could offer, with his favored the local transportation scene over time. Culver and Manhattan Beach operations in line to be Owing to unfavorable business arrangements with prime beneficiaries. He joined the Board of the Brooklyn connecting steamboat operators, both LIRR and its Pro- Elevated Railroad Company in 1894 and ultimately in- spect Park & Coney Island affiliate dropped all passen- fluenced his fellow board members to allow a direct, ger service from its Bay Ridge terminal to Manhattan physical connection between the Fifth Avenue “L” and Beach and Coney Island (Culver Depot) after the 1897 the Culver Line which left the existing structure between season ended. Having been significantly enlarged from 5th and 6th Avenues and ramped to the surface, tying its original state between 1892 and 1895, trains and boats at the Bay Ridge facility were by then interacting into the “Prospect Park & South Brooklyn R.R.” (the th connecting trackage that had opened in 1890) as it en- at a newer, larger deep water port at the foot of 65 tered Union Depot. On August 5, 1895 a jointly- Street. This included the freight side of operations as operated seasonal service (at least in an administrative well as passenger trains, with LIRR doubled in size at sense, the equipment and crews were provided by the site relative to the neighboring Sea Beach Railroad. BER) was inaugurated which originated at the Washing- Thereafter, commencing in May, 1898, LIRR trains to Coney Island originated from both Union Depot ton (Sands) Street elevated station next to the Brooklyn th Bridge, traversed the Fifth Avenue Elevated to 36th (nominal) and the newer 39 Street Ferry (seasonal), Street, and then took this new ramp connection to the following the Culver Line for the length of their journeys. Culver Line. On Gravesend (McDonald) Avenue, be- By this final season, the Culver Line had a slightly differ- tween the present-day Foster and Elmwood Avenues, ent range of stations than it had possessed ten years was “Parkville Junction,” where a left-hand turn-out had (Continued on page 3) been added to allow these through excursion trains to 2 ERA BULLETIN — JULY, 2016 From Recognition to Dominance cessions to, and cooperation from the BRT: one from 39th Street Ferry to Manhattan Beach, the other from (Continued from page 2) Long Island City to the Gravesend Race Track by way earlier, but still not those which completely resembled of Parkville Junction.
Recommended publications
  • Wanderings Newsletter of the OUTDOORS CLUB INC
    Wanderings newsletter of the OUTDOORS CLUB INC. http://www.outdoorsclubny.org ISSUE NUMBER 108 PUBLISHED TRI-ANNUALLY Jul-Oct 2014 The Outdoors Club is a non-profit 501(c) (3) volunteer-run organization open to all adults 18 and over which engages in hiking, biking, wilderness trekking, canoeing, mountaineering, snowshoeing and skiing, nature and educational city walking tours of varying difficulty. Individual participants are expected to engage in activities suitable to their ability, experience and physical condition. Leaders may refuse to take anyone who lacks ability or is not properly dressed or equipped. These precautions are for your safety, and the wellbeing of the group. Your participation is voluntary and at your own risk. Remember to bring lunch and water on all full day activities. Telephone the leader or Lenny if unsure what to wear or bring with you on an activity. Nonmembers pay one-day membership dues of $3. It is with sorrow that we say goodbye to Robert Kaye, the brother of Alan Kaye, who died in January. We have been able to keep the dues the same, and publish the Newsletter because of Robert’s benevolence to the Club. Robert wanted to make sure that the Club would continue after Alan’s death. Please join Bob Susser and Helen Yee on Saturday, October 18th, at the New York Botanical Gardens for a memorial walk in honor of Robert Kaye. CHECK THE MAILING LABEL ON YOUR SCHEDULE FOR EXPIRATION DATE! RENEWAL NOTICES WILL NO LONGER BE SENT. It takes 4-6 weeks to process your renewal. Some leaders will be asking members for proof of membership, so please carry your membership card or schedule on activities (the expiration date is on the top line of your mailing label).
    [Show full text]
  • Your Family's Guide to Explore NYC for FREE with Your Cool Culture Pass
    coolculture.org FAMILY2019-2020 GUIDE Your family’s guide to explore NYC for FREE with your Cool Culture Pass. Cool Culture | 2019-2020 Family Guide | coolculture.org WELCOME TO COOL CULTURE! Whether you are a returning family or brand new to Cool Culture, we welcome you to a new year of family fun, cultural exploration and creativity. As the Executive Director of Cool Culture, I am excited to have your family become a part of ours. Founded in 1999, Cool Culture is a non-profit organization with a mission to amplify the voices of families and strengthen the power of historically marginalized communities through engagement with art and culture, both within cultural institutions and beyond. To that end, we have partnered with your child’s school to give your family FREE admission to almost 90 New York City museums, historic societies, gardens and zoos. As your child’s first teacher and advocate, we hope you find this guide useful in adding to the joy, community, and culture that are part of your family traditions! Candice Anderson Executive Director Cool Culture 2020 Cool Culture | 2019-2020 Family Guide | coolculture.org HOW TO USE YOUR COOL CULTURE FAMILY PASS You + 4 = FREE Extras Are Extra Up to 5 people, including you, will be The Family Pass covers general admission. granted free admission with a Cool Culture You may need to pay extra fees for special Family Pass to approximately 90 museums, exhibits and activities. Please call the $ $ zoos and historic sites. museum if you’re unsure. $ More than 5 people total? Be prepared to It’s For Families pay additional admission fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting
    Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting April 2021 Committee Members P. Foye, Chair N. Zuckerman, Vice Chair A. Albert J. Barbas N. Brown M. Fleischer R. Glucksman R. Herman D. Jones K. Law R. Linn D. Mack J. Samuelsen V. Tessitore Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Wednesday, 4/21/2021 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MARCH 17, 2021 CPOC Committee Minutes - Page 3 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2021 - 2022 CPOC Committee Work Plan - Page 4 4. PRESIDENT’S REPORT President's Report - Page 6 5. CAPITAL PROGRAM UPDATE Progress Report on Signals and Train Control - Page 10 IEC Project Review on Signals and Train Control - Page 14 6. CAPITAL PROGRAM STATUS Commitments, Completions, and Funding Report - Page 31 MINUTES OF MEETING MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE March 17, 2021 New York, New York 10:00 A.M. Because of the ongoing COVID‐19 public health crisis, the MTA Chairman convened a one‐day, virtual Board and Committee meeting session on March 17, 2021, which included the following committees: Long Island Rail Road and Metro‐North Railroad; New York City Transit; MTA Bridges and Tunnels; ; Finance Capital Program Oversight Committee; Corporate Governance. To see a summary of the CPOC Committee meeting, please refer to the March 17, 2021 Board minutes in the April Board Book available here on the Board materials website: https://new.mta.info/transparency/board‐and‐committee‐meetings/april‐2021 ________________________________________________________________________________ Master Page # 3 of 46 - Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 4/21/2021 2021- 2022 CPOC Committee Work Plan I.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Socioeconomic Conditions
    Chapter 3: Socioeconomic Conditions A. INTRODUCTION This chapter analyzes whether the proposed actions would result in changes in residential and economic activity that would constitute significant adverse socioeconomic impacts as defined by the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual.1 The proposed actions would result in the redevelopment of an underutilized site with an approximately 214,000- square-foot (sf), 60-foot-tall commercial building currently anticipated to be a BJ’s Wholesale Club along with up to three other retail stores on the second level, 690 parking spaces, and approximately 2.4 acres of publicly accessible waterfront open space. The Brooklyn Bay Center site (“project site”) is located at 1752 Shore Parkway between Shore Parkway South to the east, Gravesend Bay (Lower New York Bay) to the west, and between the prolongation of 24th Avenue to the north and the prolongation of Bay 37th Street to the south. The objective of the socioeconomic conditions analysis is to determine if the introduction of the retail uses planned under the proposed actions would directly or indirectly impact population, housing stock, or economic activities in the local study area or in the larger retail trade area. Pursuant to the CEQR Technical Manual, significant impacts could occur if an action meets one or more of the following tests: (1) if the action would lead to the direct displacement of residents such that the socioeconomic profile of the neighborhood would be substantially altered; (2) if the action would lead to the displacement of substantial numbers of businesses or employees, or would displace a business that plays a critical role in the community; (3) if the action would result in substantial new development that is markedly different from existing uses in a neighborhood; (4) if the action would affect real estate market conditions not only on the site anticipated to be developed, but in a larger study area; or (5) if the action would have a significant adverse effect on economic conditions in a specific industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson River Libery State Libery
    This fantasy map depicts the Second Ave subway as a fully built out system with a 8th Ave Exp., Fulton St Exp. Broadway Lcl., Astoria Lcl., 4th Ave Exp. 2nd Ave Exp., Fulton St lcl. Wakefield- Eastchester-Dyre Ave Astoria-Ditmars Blvd to 241st St four track trunk line running down 2nd Ave, three branch lines in the Bronx to 207th St to Lefferts Blvd, Rockaways Langdale St to Cross Island Pkwy 5 Stillwell Ave via Bridge 2 Fordham, Co-op City, and Throgs Neck, service along the Queens Blvd line with an 6th Ave Exp., Grand Concourse Lcl., 2nd Ave Lcl., Throgs Neck Lcl., Bushwick Exp., Atlantic Exp. extended Hillside Ave subway, service to south Brooklyn via the Brighton Beach Culver Line Exp. Fulton St Exp. Francis Lewis Blvd to Midtown via Nereid Ave E Gun Hill Rd to Stillwell Ave E Tremont Ave to Far Rockawy Forest Hills, to Downtown via Atlantic Ave Wakefield 5 and West End lines, and service to south Jamaica and Far Rockaway via the Fulton St subway with an extension out to Cross Island Blvd. Broadway Exp., Astoria Lcl 8th Ave Lcl., Fulton St Lcl. Brighton Beach Exp. 7th Ave Lcl. 168th St to Euclid Ave Riverdale 233rd St Baychester Ave Astoria-Ditmars Blvd to 242nd St, Bronx to South Ferry For more information Stillwell Ave via Bridge visit vanshnookenraggen.com Free Subway Transfer 6th Ave Exp., Grand Concourse Exp., Broadway Lcl., Queens Blvd Lcl., 7th Ave Exp., White Plains Lcl., Co-op City Eastern Pkwy Lcl. Woodlawn Woodlawn West End Lcl. 4th Ave Lcl.
    [Show full text]
  • NYC TRANSIT's RESPONSE to DECEMBER 2010 BLIZZARD INTRODUCTION on Sunday, December 26, 2010 and the Early Hours of Monday, Dece
    MTA/OIG Report #2011-07 December 2011 NYC TRANSIT’S RESPONSE TO DECEMBER 2010 BLIZZARD Barry L. Kluger MTA Inspector General State of New York INTRODUCTION On Sunday, December 26, 2010 and the early hours of Monday, December 27, over two feet of snow fell on the New York metropolitan area accompanied by high winds. The blizzard was not predicted until just 24 hours before and hit New York City with even more force than anticipated. New York City Transit (NYC Transit) service was dramatically curtailed on both buses and subways by 9:00 PM. Many customers and employees traveling aboard subway cars and buses became stranded during the evening of the blizzard and as the night wore on. Their isolation increased by having little to no communication with outside parties. NYC Transit estimates that approximately 650 buses were stuck in the snow, while some 500 people were stranded aboard subway cars overnight. The recovery process was lengthy, with passengers still being rescued on Monday morning. Full service was not restored for several days. Following the storm and subsequent clean up, the Chairman of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) charged the various MTA agencies (including NYC Transit) with conducting internal reviews of their responses to the December blizzard to identify weaknesses and make recommendations for improvement. Best practices from other transit properties were to be analyzed by MTA along with the need for long-term technological improvements in communication and storm response capability. In June 2011, MTA officials presented to the MTA Board the proposed final agency report on MTA Storm Performance Review.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin the MILEPOSTS of THE
    ERA BULLETIN — JANUARY, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 1 January, 2017 The Bulletin THE MILEPOSTS OF THE Published by the Electric NEW YORK SUBWAY SYSTEM Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box by ERIC R. OSZUSTOWICZ 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. Many of us are familiar with the chaining three former divisions (plus the Flushing and system for the tracks of the New York sub- Canarsie Lines) had one zero point. Most of For general inquiries, or way system. Each track on the system has a these signs have been removed due to vari- Bulletin submissions, marker every 50 feet based on a “zero point” ous construction projects over the years and contact us at bulletin@ for that particular track. For example, the ze- were never replaced. Their original purpose erausa.org. ERA’s ro point for the BMT Broadway Subway is is unknown, but shortly after their installation, website is just north of 57th Street-Seventh Avenue. The they quickly fell into disuse. www.erausa.org. southbound local track is Track A1. 500 feet Over the years, I have been recording and Editorial Staff: south of the zero point, the marker is photographing the locations of the remaining Editor-in-Chief: A1/5+00. One hundred fifty feet further south, mileposts before they all disappear com- Bernard Linder the marker is A1/6+50. If you follow the line pletely. These locations were placed on a Tri-State News and all the way to 14th Street-Union Square, one spreadsheet. Using track schematics show- Commuter Rail Editor: Ronald Yee will find a marker reading A1/120+00 within ing exact distances, I was able to deduce the North American and World the station.
    [Show full text]
  • CROSS HARBOR FREIGHT PROGRAM Needs Assessment
    CROSS HARBOR FREIGHT PROGRAM Needs Assessment September 2010 Cross Harbor Freight Program Needs Assessment A. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND OPPORTUNTIES The greater New York/New Jersey/Connecticut region is the financial center of the United States economy, the nation’s largest consumer market, and a major hub of entertainment, services, fashion, and culture. The region receives, processes, and distributes raw materials, intermediate products, and finished consumer goods, which move to and from the rest of the United States and countries around the world. To fully understand the existing freight market for the region and forecast its future conditions, a 54-county, multi-state Cross Harbor modeling study area has been established, comprising portions of southern New York, northern and central New Jersey, western and southern Connecticut, and a portion of eastern Pennsylvania (see Figure 1). In 2007, more than 920 million tons of freight moved to, from, within, and through the 54- county Cross Harbor modeling study area by surface transportation modes (truck and rail). Excluding through traffic, nearly 690 million tons were handled, and 93.2 percent of this tonnage was handled by truck. By 2035, it is forecast that nearly 1.2 billion tons of freight will be moved to, from, within, or through the study area by truck and rail. Excluding through traffic, more than 860 million tons will be handled by truck and rail, and 92.5 percent of this tonnage will be handled by truck. Between 2007 and 2035, the study area truck tonnage will increase by around 160 million tons and rail tonnage will increase by around 18 million tons (excluding through traffic).
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the G Line
    Review of the G Line ,. July 10, 2013 NYC Transit G Line Review Executive Summary Executive Summary The attached report provides a comprehensive review of operations on the G line. Based on NYC Transit’s standard measures of On-Time Performance and Wait Assessment, the G performs well relative to the average subway line. At the same time, the G differs from other NYC Transit subway lines because the route is relatively short and never enters Manhattan, and thus serves primarily as a feeder/distributor with most riders transferring at least once before reaching their destinations. This review identifies a number of opportunities to improve operations on the G line, with recommendations chiefly intended to provide more even train headways and passenger loading, as well as to improve customer communication. Key Findings: While G ridership has grown significantly in recent years, it still remains relatively low compared to the rest of the system, and average passenger loads on the G are within service guidelines during both peak and off-peak hours. Scheduling the G train around the busier and more frequent F train causes uneven headways and passenger loads on the G, most significantly during the afternoon peak period, when G service is scheduled at the minimum guideline frequency of 6 trains per hour (an average 10-minute headway). G riders make twice as many transfers as the average subway rider; this high transfer rate is inconvenient for customers who must wait for multiple trains. Trains shorter than the platform length cause uncertainty about where the G train stops, contributing to uneven passenger loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the a and C Lines
    Review of the A and C Lines ,. December 11, 2015 Page intentionally left blank AC Line Review Executive Summary Executive Summary The attached report provides a comprehensive review of operations on the A and C lines. Combined, the two lines serve 800,000 riders a day across three boroughs and connect to many of the most important intermodal hubs in New York City. The A differs from most other New York City Transit subway lines in that its route splits three ways at its southern end in eastern Queens. It is also exceptionally long, at 32 miles between 207 St and Far Rockaway-Mott Av. Like many other subway lines, it merges several times with other lines. The combination of these traits tends to reduce reliability. In contrast, the C is a shorter line scheduled to run less frequently than the A and many other lines. C service is relatively reliable, even though it has historically been assigned some of the oldest cars in the system. This review has been prepared within the context of NYC Transit’s service planning procedures, and all discussions of service levels take into account established guidelines for designing and scheduling service. NYC Transit determines how many trains run on a given line based on a number of factors, including line capacity, equipment availability, and the Rapid Transit Loading Guidelines. The Guidelines ensure that limited resources are equitably allocated throughout the system by establishing, by time of day, maximum passenger load levels and minimum service frequencies, where operationally feasible. The Guidelines are applied by evaluating average ridership levels at locations where trains are most heavily loaded (“peak load points”) to develop recommended service frequencies, where operationally feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • LIRR Pages PRR Record of Transportation Lines
    NEW YORK ZONE - ASSOCIATED UNES THE LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD COMPANY ALL SITUATE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK LENGTH OF TRACKS. MILES Oeeember 31. 1940 IncreMe and Decrease during 1940 Valuation NAME OF UNE. 0" Section -; [~ ]! Jj l~ ~ ,eoE:! l~ U U THE LONG ISLAND RAI L ROAD CO. - LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD COl1PANY,THE •• 2-N Y Long Island Clty,N.Y.,91 feet east of centre of • • passenger statlon,to Greenport,N.Y.,418 feet east of - Lo:ni~~~~ g~~~:n~~~, ~~!;~~~~. T;~~~: t~ 'whit~p;t:N: y:;" 94.43 31.53 13.42 13.18 60.07 212.63 0.13 0.13 2-N.Y. jilllctlon with Glendale Cut-off, 42 feet east of centre 4.37 4.13 0.33 8.83 - NOR~~ ~~~o~~~g~;e~cH~i:i:R:R:"""""""" ..... 2a.-N.Y. Long Island Clty,N.Y.,Float BrlC1ges J foot of 5th Street, to 460 feet east. of east line of Harold Avenue ••••...• 2.13 2.24 27.87 32.24 - I10NTAUK CUT-OFF,L.I.R,R. Long Island C1tY,N.Y.,junction with North Shore la-N.Y. Freight Branch,4 feet west of centre line- of Dutch- kills Street, to junction with Montauk Branch,154 feet west of centre line of Greenpoint Avenue •.•.•. 1.11 1.03............ 0.80 2.94 ...................... - Long Island 9ity,west line of Pierson Place,701 feet 9-N.Y. from point of switch connection with Montauk Cut- gIdi~~a~o~n~s o£e~~~o~e:I~:I) 7~~:. ~::~~. ::::: ...... 2.33 2.33 .....
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 1997 / Notices 1487
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 1997 / Notices 1487 Surface Transportation Board Street in Georgetown, at milepost 0.54; to continue in control of New York & and MP's undivided one-half interest in Atlantic Railway Company (NYAR), [STB Finance Docket No. 33318] ICC Track No. 48, extending from upon NYAR's becoming a Class III rail Port of ColumbiaÐAcquisition milepost 0.54 south and west 5,470 feet carrier. to a point connecting with GRR's line The exemption was to become ExemptionÐUnion Pacific Railroad 1 Company from Kerr, in Williamson County, TX. effective on December 12, 1996, and the GRR is also acquiring MP's undivided transaction is expected to be Port of Columbia (Port) has filed a one-half interest in the 5,478-foot ICC consummated in the first quarter of verified notice of exemption under 49 Track No. 47, and a 120-foot section of 1997. CFR 1150.31 to acquire approximately Track No. 11, in Georgetown, but as This transaction is related to STB 37.4 miles of rail line owned by Union these will be used as side tracks, no Finance Docket No. 33300, New York & Pacific Railroad Company (UP) between exemption from 49 U.S.C. 10902 is Atlantic Railway CompanyÐOperation milepost 48.0 near Walla Walla, WA, necessary, due to the statutory ExemptionÐThe Long Island Rail Road and milepost 71.3 at Bolles, WA, and exemption for acquisition and operation Company, wherein NYAR seeks to between milepost 0.0 at Bolles, WA, and of side tracks in 49 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]