A Technical Review Document on the Ecological, Social and Economic Features of the North Sea Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Technical Review Document on the Ecological, Social and Economic Features of the North Sea Region Work Package 1 EC FP7 project # 212881 A technical review document on the ecological, social and economic features of the North Sea region van Hal, R.1, Paramor, O.A.L2, Le Quesne, W.J.F.3, Aanesen, M.4, Hegland, T.5, Armstrong, C. 4, Raakær, J.5, van Hoof, L.J.W.1, van Overzee, H.M.J.1, Frid, C.L.J.2, Valesco, F.6 & Piet, G.J.1 1. Wageningen IMARES, PO Box 68, 1970 AB Ijmuiden, The Netherlands 2. School of Biological Sciences, Biosciences Building, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK 3. CEFAS, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, UK 4. Norwegian College of Fishery Science, University of Tromsø, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway 5. Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 5, P.O. Box 159, DK – 9100, Aalborg, Denmark 6. Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia, Centro Oceanografico de Santander, PO Box 240, 39080 Santander, Spain Acknowledgements Much of the material used in this report is sourced from published material from the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES) and the Oslo Paris Commission (OSPAR). We acknowledge this input as the work of an extensive scientific community. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 1 OVERVIEW OF THE NORTH SEA 3 1.1 Ecological environment 4 1.1.1 Physical and Chemical Features 4 1.1.2 Spatial and temporal distribution of salinity 9 1.1.3 Spatial and temporal distribution of nutrients 12 1.1.4 pH, pCO2 profiles 14 1.1.5 Habitats 16 1.1.6 Biological Features 22 1.1.7 What constitutes Good Ecological Status? 28 1.2 Human Activities 38 1.2.1 Shipping 38 1.2.2 Shipping Marine Aggregate Extraction 39 1.2.3 Offshore wind farms 40 1.2.4 Tourism 42 1.2.5 Aquaculture 43 1.2.6 Dumping 44 1.2.7 Oil and Gas 44 1.2.8 How human activities are likely to develop 46 1.3 Socio-economic ‘environment’ 53 1.3.1 Institutional Governance Setup of Fisheries Management in the North Sea 53 1.3.2 Selected Reforms of the Current EU Fisheries Governance System 71 1.3.3 Management tools 81 1.3.4 Socio-Economic considerations 83 2 INTERACTION BETWEEN THE ECOSYSTEM AND FISHERIES CASE STUDIES 89 2.1 Description of fisheries case studies 89 2.1.1 Mixed flatfish Beam trawl 89 2.1.2 Sandeel industrial fisheries 93 2.1.3 Herring pelagic fisheries 95 2.1.4 Mixed demersal whitefish trawl fishery 96 2.2 Description of the ‘Social and Ecological Component by Pressure matrix ’ 98 2.2.1 Socio Economic variables in the Matrix 98 2.2.2 Biological variables in the Matrix 101 2.2.3 Reading the SECPM 102 2.3 Social and Ecological Component by Pressure matrix 103 2.4 Ecological Matrix elements supporting evidence 107 i 2.4.1 Mixed flatfish Beam trawl 107 2.4.2 Sandeel industrial fisheries 124 2.4.3 Herring pelagic fisheries 131 2.4.4 Mixed demersal whitefish trawl fishery 137 2.5 Synergistic effects of the case study fisheries with other human activities 148 2.5.1 Mixed flatfish Beam trawl 148 2.5.2 Sandeel industrial fisheries 149 2.5.3 Pelagic herring fisheries 149 2.5.4 Demersal mixed whitefish fisheries 149 2.6 Models of fishing effects 150 2.6.1 Modelling the mortality of fish 150 2.6.2 Modelling the mortality of benthos 152 3 WHAT PEOPLE THINK 153 4 CONCLUSIONS 154 5 REFERENCES 155 APPENDIX 1: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF EUTROPHICATION 168 APPENDIX 2: FURTHER READING SECTION 1.2.8 169 APPENDIX 3: SOCIO-ECONOMIC VARIABLES 170 ii SUMMARY It is recognised that much of the information and knowledge currently available to develop an ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Europe is not being used effectively as it is so widely dispersed (Connolly and Rice, 2005). The aim of this Work Package was to integrate the existing knowledge on ecological and socio-economical issues in the North Sea region. Chapter one gives an overview of this knowledge, starting with a description of the physical and chemical features of the North Sea that form the conditions within which the biological features have evolved and now depend. The biological features are described, from benthic and algal communities to the fish communities, marine mammals and sea birds. The first section of this chapter also provides a description of Good Environmental Status (GES) and the process of determining and managing GES. The second section considers the human activities occurring and impacting on the North Sea environment, including an overview of existing activities and potential future activities. The final section of chapter one provides a description of the socio-economic environment. This section focuses on fisheries management at an European scale, but with specific attention for North Sea issues. It provides an overview of the institutional setup underlying the governance system of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) of the European Union. The position and jurisdiction of the Commission, Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), Regional Advisory Councils (RACS) and the European parliament are also described. Reform of the current CFP framework is also discussed in the light of on-going criticism that it is not able to ensure efficient and uniform control and enforcement of its legislation. In response to this criticism, the Commission is currently taking action to overhaul the control and enforcement system of the CFP as a core priority. The reformed framework is projected to enter into force from 2010. Existing and potential fisheries management tools are also described. These tools can be divided into three overarching groups; input (e.g. area and time restrictions) and output (e.g. TACs and discard regulations) management, as well as economic incentive mechanisms (e.g. Individual Tradable Quotas and subsidies). Finally, there is an overview of the socio- economic considerations of European fisheries and fishing dependent communities. Chapter two focuses on four fisheries cases studies in the North Sea, chosen based on their importance in the area, their likely impact on the environment and data availability. The first case study is the mixed flatfish beam trawl, a Dutch dominated fishery in the southern North Sea mainly targeting valuable flatfish species as sole (Solea vulgaris) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). This fishery is heavily debated due to the high impact of the heavy beams used on habitat structure. The second case study is the sandeel industrial fishery, which is controlled by the Danish and Norwegians and it is the largest single species fishery in the North Sea. This fishery is under pressure due to the low standing stock of the North Sea sandeel. The third case study is the herring pelagic fisheries, which is possibly one of the best managed fisheries in which a number of the actors active in this fishery have received the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label. The final case study is the mixed demersal whitefish trawl fishery predominantly active in the Northern North Sea which targets demersal roundfish species including cod (Gadus morhua), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) and whiting (Merlangius merlangus). Following the description of these fisheries case studies, this chapter attempts to combine the impacts of the case study fisheries, with the effect of socio-economic component, on an extended list of ecological components (e.g. habitats, the food web, all individual components of the food web etc.) in a pressure matrix, termed the Social and Ecological Component by Pressure Matrix (SECPM). The SECPM provides an overview of the interactions between the fishery and various component of the fishery system, ecological and socio-economic. The matrices by case study were followed by and extensive description of the impact on the specific Ecological components, which is supporting evidence for the inclusion of the interaction in the SECPM. 1 Chapter two also identifies the problem of synergistic effects of the fisheries cases studies with other human activities and drivers (e.g. climate) and demonstrates that studies which consider the impact of specific activities in isolation may underestimate their system-level effects. Even though climate control is beyond the scope of North Sea management, it effects need to be considered in assessment and management of human activities and impacts within the region. Finally, this chapter describes two models for calculating the effect of the fisheries cases on the mortality of benthic and fish communities. These models are available for further use within the MEFEPO project. The aim of Chapter 3 was to identify and collate data from national and international marine consultative initiatives. However, it became clear that previous stakeholder consultations and responses have revealed very little information that could be used in a forward-looking manner to support the MEFEPO project in the development of operational objectives and identification of operational challenges to introducing an ecosystem approach. This is because the present governance framework at both national and international level is very dynamic, and consultative processes are undergoing rapid changes, and the introduction of the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) has set a new standard for stakeholder consultation. There is limited information on the performance of this type of stakeholder consultation, therefore details of this important vehicle for stakeholder consultation in the EU cannot be incorporated at this stage. However, this work is planned for the next work packages of the MEFEPO project. 2 1 Overview of the North Sea The boundaries of the North Sea have been delineated by a number of organisations (including OSPAR and ICES) for management purposes. MEFEPO will use the North Sea boundaries as delineated by the North Sea Regional Advisory Council (NS RAC) (Figure 1.1) as this spatial unit is used to present socio-economic information on the fishing industry to the European Union.
Recommended publications
  • Seafood Group Project Final Report
    University of California, Santa Barbara Bren School of Environmental Science and Management From Sea to Table: Recommendations for Tracing Seafood 2010 Group Project Jamie Gibbon Connor Hastings Tucker Hirsch Kristen Hislop Eric Stevens Faculty Advisors: Hunter Lenihan John Melack Client: Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Sustainable Seafood Initiative From Sea to Table: Recommendations for Tracing Seafood From Sea to Table: Recommendations for Tracing Seafood As authors of this Group Project report, we are proud to archive this report on the Bren School’s website such that the results of our research are available for all to read. Our signatures on the document signify our joint responsibility to fulfill the archiving standards set by the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management. Jamie Gibbon Connor Hastings Tucker Hirsch Kristen Hislop Eric Stevens The mission of the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management is to produce professionals with unrivaled training in environmental science and management who will devote their unique skills to the diagnosis, assessment, mitigation, prevention, and remedy of the environmental problems of today and the future. A guiding principal of the School is that the analysis of environmental problems requires quantitative training in more than one discipline and an awareness of the physical, biological, social, political, and economic consequences that arise from scientific or technological decisions. The Group Project is required of all students in the Master’s of Environmental Science and Management (MESM) Program. It is a three-quarter activity in which small groups of students conduct focused, interdisciplinary research on the scientific, management, and policy dimensions of a specific environmental issue.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecosystem Model of the North Sea to Support an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management: Description and Parameterisation
    Science Series Technical Report no.142 An ecosystem model of the North Sea to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries management: description and parameterisation S. Mackinson and G. Daskalov Science Series Technical Report no.142 An ecosystem model of the North Sea to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries management: description and parameterisation S. Mackinson and G. Daskalov This report should be cited as: Mackinson, S. and Daskalov, G., 2007. An ecosystem model of the North Sea to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries management: description and parameterisation. Sci. Ser. Tech Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 142: 196pp. This report represents the views and findings of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders. © Crown copyright, 2008 This publication (excluding the logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium for research for non-commercial purposes, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being re-used accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. This publication is also available at www.Cefas.co.uk For any other use of this material please apply for a Click-Use Licence for core material at www.hmso.gov.uk/copyright/licences/ core/core_licence.htm, or by writing to: HMSO’s Licensing Division St Clements House 2–16 Colegate Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax: 01603 723000 E-mail: [email protected] List of contributors and reviewers Name Affiliation
    [Show full text]
  • A Biotope Sensitivity Database to Underpin Delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the Seas Around England and Scotland
    English Nature Research Reports Number 499 A biotope sensitivity database to underpin delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the seas around England and Scotland Harvey Tyler-Walters Keith Hiscock This report has been prepared by the Marine Biological Association of the UK (MBA) as part of the work being undertaken in the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). The report is part of a contract placed by English Nature, additionally supported by Scottish Natural Heritage, to assist in the provision of sensitivity information to underpin the implementation of the Habitats Directive and the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. The views expressed in the report are not necessarily those of the funding bodies. Any errors or omissions contained in this report are the responsibility of the MBA. February 2003 You may reproduce as many copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains, jointly, with English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Marine Biological Association of the UK. ISSN 0967-876X © Joint copyright 2003 English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Marine Biological Association of the UK. Biotope sensitivity database Final report This report should be cited as: TYLER-WALTERS, H. & HISCOCK, K., 2003. A biotope sensitivity database to underpin delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the seas around England and Scotland. Report to English Nature and Scottish Natural Heritage from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the UK. [Final Report] 2 Biotope sensitivity database Final report Contents Foreword and acknowledgements.............................................................................................. 5 Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction to the project ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Where Does Your Seafood Come From?
    Where Does Your Seafood Come From? Author contact information Wynn W. Cudmore, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Northwest Center for Sustainable Resources Chemeketa Community College P.O. Box 14007 Salem, OR 97309 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 503-399-6514 Published 2009 DUE # 0757239 1 NCSR curriculum modules are designed as comprehensive instructions for students and supporting materials for faculty. The student instructions are designed to facilitate adaptation in a variety of settings. In addition to the instructional materials for students, the modules contain separate supporting information in the "Notes to Instructors" section, and when appropriate, PowerPoint slides. The modules also contain other sections which contain additional supporting information such as assessment strategies and suggested resources. The PowerPoint slides associated with this module are the property of the Northwest Center for Sustainable Resources (NCSR). Those containing text may be reproduced and used for any educational purpose. Slides with images may be reproduced and used without prior approval of NCSR only for educational purposes associated with this module. Prior approval must be obtained from NCSR for any other use of these images. Permission requests should be made to [email protected]. Acknowledgements We thank David Lonsdale and Richard O’Hara of Chemeketa Community College for their thoughtful reviews. Their comments and suggestions greatly improved the quality of this module. We thank NCSR administrative assistant, Liz Traver,
    [Show full text]
  • Padrões De Distribuição Da Abundância Larvar De Crustáceos Decápodes Na Baía De Cascais
    UNIVERSIDADE DO ALGARVE FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DO MAR E DO AMBIENTE PADRÕES DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO DA ABUNDÂNCIA LARVAR DE CRUSTÁCEOS DECÁPODES NA BAÍA DE CASCAIS DISSERTAÇÃO PARA A OBTENÇÃO DO GRAU DE MESTRE EM BIOLOGIA MARINHA ESPECIALIZAÇÃO EM ECOLOGIA E CONSERVAÇÃO MARINHA CARLA ISABEL DE ALMEIDA SANTINHO FARO 2009 UNIVERSIDADE DO ALGARVE FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DO MAR E DO AMBIENTE PADRÕES DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO DA ABUNDÂNCIA LARVAR DE CRUSTÁCEOS DECÁPODES NA BAÍA DE CASCAIS DISSERTAÇÃO PARA A OBTENÇÃO DO GRAU DE MESTRE EM BIOLOGIA MARINHA ESPECIALIZAÇÃO EM ECOLOGIA E CONSERVAÇÃO MARINHA CARLA ISABEL DE ALMEIDA SANTINHO FARO 2009 Dissertação realizada no Instituto Nacional dos Recursos Biológicos – IPIMAR (Lisboa) entre Abril de 2007 e Fevereiro de 2009, Orientada por: Doutora Antonina dos Santos Investigadora do INRB-IPIMAR e Doutora Margarida Castro Professora associada da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente da Universidade do Algarve. Agradecimentos Gostaria de agradecer a todas as pessoas que tornaram possível a realização deste trabalho. Em primeiro lugar o meu agradecimento muito especial à minha orientadora Doutora Antonina dos Santos que tão bem me aconselhou durante a realização deste trabalho. Muito obrigado por ter acreditado sempre, pelo apoio e incentivo, pela paciência, por me ensinado tanto e por estar sempre disponível para me ajudar. O meu enorme obrigado à Professora Doutora Margarida Castro por ter aceite ser minha orientadora e por me ter amparado sempre perante as dificuldades que surgiram desde o início. Muito obrigado pela confiança, pela paciência, pela sua disponibilidade e pelos conhecimentos que me transmitiu. Agradeço às minhas colegas de gabinete e laboratório, Cátia e Joana, por me terem acolhido tão bem e me terem ajudado em tudo e mais alguma coisa sempre que precisei.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Arthropods of Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2014) 38: http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1405-48 The marine arthropods of Turkey 1, 1 1 2 Ahmet Kerem BAKIR *, Tuncer KATAĞAN , Halim Vedat AKER , Tahir ÖZCAN , 3 4 1 1 Murat SEZGİN , Abdullah Suat ATEŞ , Cengiz KOÇAK , Fevzi KIRKIM 1 Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey 2 Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technology, Mustafa Kemal University, İskenderun, Hatay, Turkey 3 Faculty of Fisheries, Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey 4 Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technology, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey Received: 29.05.2014 Accepted: 30.07.2014 Published Online: 00.00.2013 Printed: 00.00.2013 Abstract: This recent checklist of marine arthropods found on the coasts of Turkey represents a total of 1531 species belonging to 7 classes: Malacostraca (766 species), Maxillopoda (437 species), Ostracoda (263 species), Pycnogonida (27 species), Arachnida (26 species), Branchiopoda (7 species), and Insecta (5 species). Seventy-five species were classified as alien species in the region. This paper also includes the first record of the amphipod Melita valesi from the Levantine coast of Turkey (Kaş, Gulf of Antalya). Key words: Arthropoda, Black Sea, Sea of Marmara, Aegean Sea, Levantine Sea, Turkey 1. Introduction İzmir Bay (Smirnæ) and the Bosphorus (Constantinopoli). The arthropods, containing approximately 1.2 million Forskål died of malaria in July 1763 and Carsten Niebuhr described species and constituting almost 80% of all edited and published the work of his friend in 1775. In described living animal species, constitute the largest the 19th century, Ostroumoff (1896) participated in the and most successful of the animal phyla.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Realm Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Species' Abundance Trends
    ARTICLES PUBLISHED: 17 FEBRUARY 2017 | VOLUME: 1 | ARTICLE NUMBER: 0067 Cross-realm assessment of climate change impacts on species’ abundance trends Diana E. Bowler1*, Christian Hof1, Peter Haase2, 3, Ingrid Kröncke4, Oliver Schweiger5, Rita Adrian6, 7, Léon Baert8, Hans-Günther Bauer9, Theo Blick10, Rob W. Brooker11, Wouter Dekoninck8, Sami Domisch6, 12, Reiner Eckmann13, Frederik Hendrickx8, Thomas Hickler1, 14, Stefan Klotz5, 15, Alexandra Kraberg16, Ingolf Kühn5, 15, 17, Silvia Matesanz18, Angelika Meschede‡, Hermann Neumann4, Robert O’Hara1, David J. Russell19, Anne F. Sell20, Moritz Sonnewald10, Stefan Stoll2, 21, Andrea Sundermann2, Oliver Tackenberg22, Michael Türkay10†, Fernando Valladares23, Kok van Herk24, Roel van Klink25, Rikjan Vermeulen26, Karin Voigtländer19, Rüdiger Wagner27, Erik Welk15, 17, Martin Wiemers5, Karen H. Wiltshire16 and Katrin Böhning-Gaese1, 22 Climate change, land-use change, pollution and exploitation are among the main drivers of species’ population trends; however, their relative importance is much debated. We used a unique collection of over 1,000 local population time series in 22 commu- nities across terrestrial, freshwater and marine realms within central Europe to compare the impacts of long-term temperature change and other environmental drivers from 1980 onwards. To disentangle different drivers, we related species’ population trends to species- and driver-specific attributes, such as temperature and habitat preference or pollution tolerance. We found a consistent impact of temperature change on the local abundances of terrestrial species. Populations of warm-dwelling species increased more than those of cold-dwelling species. In contrast, impacts of temperature change on aquatic species’ abundances were variable. Effects of temperature preference were more consistent in terrestrial communities than effects of habitat pref- erence, suggesting that the impacts of temperature change have become widespread for recent changes in abundance within many terrestrial communities of central Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Marine Science Vol
    Mediterranean Marine Science Vol. 5/2, 2004, 53-64 Key for the identification of Mediterranean brachyuran megalopae D. PESSANI, T. TIRELLI & S. FLAGELLA Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell’Uomo, Via Accademia Albertina 17, 10123 Torino, Italy e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Based on larval literature, an identification key has been constructed for the megalopae of 55 species of Mediterranean Brachyura. This key is based mainly on external morphological characteristics visible, by using a microscope, limiting the necessity for dissection of specimens. Characteristics used include presence/absence of ornamentation on the carapace, number of abdominal somites, number and position of setae and/or spines on antennula, antenna, pereiopods and structure of uropods, etc. Partial dissection is only required to count the setae on the scaphognathite margin. Using the above characters, it is also possible to gather almost all the families into groups. However, the megalopae of Portunidae as well as those of the three species of Brachynotus genus are similar to each other and their identification at a specific level requires the use of features somehow variable and difficult to count. In the Majidae, the megalopae of 14 species are already known. The complexity of morphological characters typical of this family makes it difficult to define characters common to all spider crab megalopae. Nevertheless, the key may be an aid for carcinology studies, especially those including sorting and identification of megalopae from plankton samples. Keywords: Larval development; Larval morphology; Key; Decapoda; Brachyura; Mediterranean Sea. Introduction obtaining this phase usually results in a high zoeal mortality. The larval development of Brachyura Of the 138 species of Brachyura totally present (Crustacea, Decapoda) includes two or more in the Mediterranean (d’Udekem d’Acoz, 1999), planktonic stages of zoea and the plankto- one or more zoeal stages are known for 78 benthonic stage of megalopa.
    [Show full text]
  • Chasing Responsible Sourcing: the Case of UK Retailers and Sustainable Seafood
    Master thesis in Sustainable Development 317 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling Chasing Responsible Sourcing: The case of UK retailers and sustainable seafood Serena Chironna DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES INSTITUTIONEN FÖR GEOVETENSKAPER Master thesis in Sustainable Development 317 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling Chasing Responsible Sourcing: The case of UK retailers and sustainable seafood Serena Chironna Supervisor: Gloria Gallardo Evaluator: Roger Herbert Copyright © Serena Chironna and the Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University Published at Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University (www.geo.uu.se), Uppsala, 2016 Content 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Seafood industry: an urgent need for sustainable practices ...................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Fish supply chain: structure, main issues and sustainability challenges ........................................................... 2 1.3 Sourcing responsibly through eco-labelling: The MSC certification ....................................................................... 5 1.3.1 MSC: limitations and critiques .......................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Do You Know the Fish You're Eating?
    Do You Know the Fish You’re Eating? “Third fisherman: …Master, I marvel how the fishes live in the sea. First fisherman: Why, as men do a-land; the great ones eat up the little ones.” — Shakespeare OVERVIEW Students design and conduct research to discover firsthand what type of fish is being sold in their community, where this fish comes from, and whether that fish is an overfished species. This lesson gives students a chance to do their own market research and discover first-hand what type of fish is being sold to the public. It also provides an introduction to fish as an important food source and as an industry controlled partly by supply and demand. The results that emerge from this lesson will likely lead your students to question the role of public education in seafood choices for sustainable fisheries. OBJECTIVES Design a research project. Conduct market research regarding the types and sources of fish sold in the local community. GRADE LEVEL 8-12 SUBJECTS Language Arts Science Social Studies VOCABULARY capacity, commodity, depletion, fishery, overfishing, populations, stocks, sustainability MATERIALS Handout #1: List of overfished and near-overfished fish species Handout #2: Overview of world’s ocean fisheries Handout #3: Sample graphs and charts NATIONAL SCIENCE STANDARDS: This activity supports the following National Academy of Sciences science education standards. Grades 5-8: Unifying Concepts and Processes—Evidence, models, and explanation Standard A: Science as Inquiry—Abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry Standard
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Watch
    AND Argentine Shortfin Squid Illex argentinus Argentina Jig October 2, 2017 The Safina Center Seafood Analysts Disclaimer Seafood Watch and The Safina Center strive to ensure that all our Seafood Reports and recommendations contained therein are accurate and reflect the most up-to-date evidence available at the time of publication. All our reports are peer-reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science or aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or of The Safina Center or their recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch and The Safina Center are solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. We always welcome additional or updated data that can be used for the next revision. About The Safina Center The Safina Center (formerly Blue Ocean Institute) translates scientific information into language people can understand and serves as a unique voice of hope, guidance, and encouragement. The Safina Center (TSC) works through science, art, and literature to inspire solutions and a deeper connection with nature, especially the sea. Our mission is to inspire more people to actively engage as well-informed and highly motivated constituents for conservation. Led by conservation pioneer and MacArthur fellow, Dr. Carl Safina, we show how nature, community, the economy and prospects for peace are all intertwined. Through Safina’s books, essays, public speaking, PBS television series, our Fellows program and Sustainable Seafood program, we seek to inspire people to make better choices. The Safina Center was founded in 2003 by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MARKETPLACE for SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD Growing Appetites and Shrinking Seas
    THE MARKETPLACE FOR SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD Growing Appetites and Shrinking Seas JUNE 2003 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Overview of the U.S. Seafood Supply 3 Figure 1.1—Alaska Pollock Catch, U.S. vs. Foreign, 1985-1994 3 Figure 1.2—U.S. Commercial Fish Landings, by Volume, 1992-2001 4 Figure 1.3—U.S. Wild Fishery Landings 2000 vs. 2001 4 Figure 1.4—U.S. Seafood Trade, by Volume 1992-2001 5 Figure 1.5—U.S. Seafood Trade, by $ Value 1992-2001 6 Figure 1.6—Leading U.S. Seafood Exports 2000 vs. 2001 6 Figure 1.7—Leading U.S. Seafood Imports 2000 vs. 2001 7 Overview of U.S. Seafood Demand 8 Figure 2.1—U.S. Consumer Expenditures on Seafood, 1993-2001 8 Figure 2.2—U.S. Seafood Consumption Volume, 1992-2001 9 Figure 2.3—U.S. Seafood Consumption 1980-2001 9 Figure 2.4—The Most Consumed Seafood in the U.S. 10 Consumer Attitudes on Sustainability 11 Figure 3.1—Frequency of Seafood Consumption 11 Figure 3.2—Awareness of Seafood Health and Sustainability Issues 12 Figure 3.3—Awareness of Seafood Source, Wild Caught or Farmed 12 Figure 3.4—Factors in Seafood Purchasing 13 Figure 3.5—Seafood Information 15 Figure 3.6—Interest in Types of Seafood Information 15 Figure 3.7—Preferred Seafood Information Channels 16 Figure 3.8—Impact of “Environmentally-Responsible” Seafood Label 17 Figure 3.9—Solutions to Problems with Commercial Fishing 18 Figure 3.10—Likely Consumption of Fish and Seafood Upon Learning of Environmental Concerns 19 Chef, Restaurateur, and Retailer Attitudes on Sustainability 20 Figure 4.1—Awareness of Seafood Health and Sustainability Issues 20 Figure 4.2—Source of Fish and Seafood 21 Figure 4.3—Response to Seafood Environmental Concerns 22 Figure 4.4—Interest in Information About Sustainable Seafood 22 Figure 4.5—Willingness to Act 23 Conclusion 24 Appendices 25 Appendix 1—List of Markets Surveyed 26 Appendix 2—Survey of Consumers 27 Appendix 3—Survey of Chefs and Restaurateurs 34 Appendix 4—Survey of Retailers 37 Statement of Principles 40 Introduction For many Americans, the most salient connection they have to the ocean is the seafood they eat.
    [Show full text]