DOCSLIB.ORG

This Document Was Printed at State Expense. Information on the Cost Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Document Was Printed at State Expense. Information on the Cost Of This document was printed at state expense. Information on the cost of publication may be obtained by contacting FWP Paid Advertisement Appears only in publication printed and distributed by FWP Subject Index 12‑hour Closure. .............................. 108 Glandular Scents. .............................. 15 Permit To Modify A H Archery Equipment (PTMAE). ...... 113 Aerial Spotting ................................... 14 Harvest Survey. ............................... 113 Pets & Parasites. ............................. 113 AISPP .............................................. 108 Horn Possession. .............................. 15 Predators and Nongame Hunting. ..... 16 Antelope HD Regulations. ................. 96 How to use these Regulations ........... 12 Prerequisite Licenses. ..................... 108 Antler/Horn/Skull Possession. ........... 15 Hunter Education. ............................ 108 Private Land. ..................................... 16 Archery. ............................................. 14 Hunter Education Requirements. .... 108 Public Land. ....................................... 17 Archery Hunters Hunter Orange Requirement. ............ 15 Public Roadways. .............................. 15 Bow and Arrow License..................109 Hunter with a Disability .................... 113 R Hunter Orange. ..................................15 Hunter, Youth. .................................. 112 Radio‑Collared Animals. .................. 113 Armed Forces. ................................. 108 Hunting Bow. ..................................... 14 Railroad Access. ................................ 17 Artificial Light. .................................... 14 Hunting District Regulations Refund Policy. ...................................111 Availability of Licenses & Permits. ... 109 Antelope...................................... 97-103 Reminders for 2018 ........................... 13 B Deer & Elk. ................................... 34-75 Replacement Licenses. ................... 110 Baiting................................................ 14 Hunting Hours............................ 15, 119 Residency. ....................................... 108 Bear Country, Montana is. ................. 22 I Resident. ......................................... 108 Block Management. ......................... 113 Identification Guide for Antelope, Deer Resident With a Disability Bonus Point System. ........................111 and Elk. .......................................... 20 Conservation License. .................. 113 Bow and Arrow License. .................. 109 Inspection of Wildlife.......................... 15 Restitution.......................................... 16 Bowhunter Education. ..................... 108 Internet (Online) Licensing. ............. 108 Restricted Area Descriptions. .......18‑19 C Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact .. 15 S Check Stations. ................................. 15 K Shotgun. ............................................ 17 Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD). ..... 11 Kill Site Verification. ........................... 15 Shoulder Seasons ............................. 10 Closed Areas. ...............................18‑19 L Simulated Wildlife. ............................. 16 Conservation License. ..................... 108 Landowner Preference. ....................111 Skull Possession. .............................. 15 Contacts. ........................................... 12 Lawful Methods of Hunting ................ 14 State Game Preserves. ..................... 17 Crossbows. ........................................ 17 Laws and Regulations. .................14‑17 State School Trust Lands. ................. 17 D Legal Descriptions State Wildlife Management Areas (WMA). ........................................... 17 Deadlines......................................... 110 Antelope....................................103-107 Stream Access................................... 17 Deer B Licenses. ..................... 109, 110 Deer and Elk. ............................... 75-90 Sunrise‑Sunset Tables. .................... 119 Deer Permit. .................................... 109 Restricted Area Descriptions. .... 18-19 SuperTag Lottery. ............................ 110 Disease or parasite transmission. ... 113 License & Permit Availability T Dogs. ................................................. 15 Chart......................................114–115 Table of Contents............................... 12 Drawing Applications. ...................... 110 License Discount Opportunities. .......111 Tapeworm. ....................................... 113 Drawing Statistics License Validation and Tagging. ........ 17 Traditional Handguns. ....................... 17 Antelope..............................................96 Littering. ............................................. 15 Transport of Wildlife. .......................... 16 Deer. ....................................................32 M Maps Tribal Land. ........................................ 17 Elk ....................................................33 Index Two‑way Communication. ................. 15 Duplicate Bow Hunter Certificates. .. 108 Antelope........................................ 91-95 U Duplicate Certificates....................... 108 Deer & Elk. ................................... 23-31 Motorized Vehicles. ........................... 15 Unlawful Methods of E Hunting Game Animals..............14‑15 Elk Drawing Statistics. ....................... 33 MT-PLAN ......................................... 113 Muzzleloader (requirements). ............ 17 Unlocking Public Lands ................... 113 Elk License. ............................. 109, 110 W Elk Permit. ....................................... 109 N Night Vision Equipment. .................... 15 Waste of Game. ................................. 17 F Weapons Restrictions. ....................... 17 Fees..................................................111 Nongame Species, Classification. ..... 16 Nonresident, Obtaining a License. .. 108 Weapons Restricted Areas ...........18‑19 Firearm Hunters................................. 15 Weed Control. .................................. 113 Firearm Hunter Orange ..................... 15 O Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) ............... 16 Weed‑Free Hay. .............................. 113 Firearms. ........................................... 14 Online Licensing. ............................. 108 WMA. ................................................. 17 Furbearers, Classification. ................. 16 Outfitters and Guides......................... 16 Wolves. .............................................. 21 Furbearer Traps. ................................ 15 Y G P Party Applications. ........................... 110 Youth Age 11.................................... 112 Game Damage Hunt Roster Rules. 108 Permit To Hunt From a Youth Hunter. ................................... 112 General Information. ........................ 113 Vehicle (PTHFV)........................... 113 Youth Hunter, Opportunities. ........... 112 General Regulations. ....................15‑16 4 Turn In Poachers. Enough is Enough! Make the call: 1-800-TIP-MONT (1-800-847-6668) Waiting for new shoulder season page for 2018 10 Turn In Poachers. Enough is Enough! Make the call: 1-800-TIP-MONT (1-800-847-6668) http://fwp.mt.gov/cwd WHAT IS CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE? WHY IS CWD MANAGEMENT IMPORTANT? CWD is a progressive, fatal neurological disease that effects deer, elk and • Helps manage long term population decline in infected herds. (Some states moose. It has been present for some years in states and Canadian provinces have seen more than 40% decline in mule deer.) north, east and south of Montana, but was first found in wild deer in the state • Decreases prevalence and likelihood of spread. in 2017 during focused CWD surveillance throughout south central Montana. • Helps slow the decline of wildlife related recreation opportunities. CWD has not been shown to spread to people, pets, livestock or wildlife • Controls potential declines in property value. outside of the deer family. However, the World Health Organization and • CWD has broader impacts to Montana’s hunting and outdoor legacy. the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend not consuming meat from an animal known to be infected with CWD. The CDC also recommends that hunters have deer tested if they were harvested in DON’T ACCIDENTALLY SPREAD CWD areas where CWD is known to be present. To Montana from other states Animals may carry the disease for years, and appear perfectly healthy. In their It is unlawful to transport into Montana from states or Canadian provinces that final months, however, they appear emaciated with drooling and drooping have experienced CWD a whole carcass, whole head, brain or spinal column heads and ears, among other symptoms (see http://fwp.mt.gov/cwd). from white-tailed deer, mule deer, moose or elk. Those states and provinces WHERE IS CWD? include Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, During the 2017 general game animal season CWD was discovered in deer Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, in Carbon County just north of Wyoming (as a result of intensive sampling at Wisconsin, Wyoming, Alberta and Saskatchewan. check stations in south central Montana) and in northern Liberty County near • Keep in mind that “evidence of sex requirements” must always be met
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alkalic-Type Epithermal Gold Deposit Model
    Alkalic-Type Epithermal Gold Deposit Model Chapter R of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–R U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Photographs of alkalic-type epithermal gold deposits and ores. Upper left: Cripple Creek, Colorado—One of the largest alkalic-type epithermal gold deposits in the world showing the Cresson open pit looking southwest. Note the green funnel-shaped area along the pit wall is lamprophyre of the Cresson Pipe, a common alkaline rock type in these deposits. The Cresson Pipe was mined by historic underground methods and produced some of the richest ores in the district. The holes that are visible along several benches in the pit (bottom portion of photograph) are historic underground mine levels. (Photograph by Karen Kelley, USGS, April, 2002). Upper right: High-grade gold ore from the Porgera deposit in Papua New Guinea showing native gold intergrown with gold-silver telluride minerals (silvery) and pyrite. (Photograph by Jeremy Richards, University of Alberta, Canada, 2013, used with permission). Lower left: Mayflower Mine, Montana—High-grade hessite, petzite, benleonardite, and coloradoite in limestone. (Photograph by Paul Spry, Iowa State University, 1995, used with permission). Lower right: View of north rim of Navilawa Caldera, which hosts the Banana Creek prospect, Fiji, from the portal of the Tuvatu prospect. (Photograph by Paul Spry, Iowa State University, 2007, used with permission). Alkalic-Type Epithermal Gold Deposit Model By Karen D. Kelley, Paul G. Spry, Virginia T. McLemore, David L. Fey, and Eric D. Anderson Chapter R of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–R U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Subduction Cycles Under Western North America During the Mesozoic and Cenozoic Eras
    .. Geological Society of America Special Paper 299 1995 Subduction cycles under western North America during the Mesozoic and Cenozoic eras Peter L. Ward U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 977, Menlo Park, California 94025 ABSTRACT An extensive review of geologic and tectonic features of western North America suggests that the interaction of oceanic plates with the continent follows a broad cycli- cal pattern. In a typical cycle, periods of rapid subduction (7-15 cdyr), andesitic vol- canism, and trench-normal contraction are followed by a shift to trench-normal extension, the onset of voluminous silicic volcanism, formation of large calderas, and the creation of major batholiths. Extension becomes pervasive in metamorphic core complexes, and there is a shift to fundamentally basaltic volcanism, formation of flood basalts, widespread rifting, rotation of terranes, and extensive circulation of flu- ids throughout the plate margin. Strike-slip faulting becomes widespread with the creation of new tectonostratigraphic terranes. A new subduction zone forms and the cycle repeats. Each cycle is 50-80 m.y. long; cycles since the Triassic have ended and begun at approximately 225, 152, 92, 44, and 15 Ma. The youngest two cycles are diachronous, one from Oregon to Alaska, the other from central Mexico to Califor- nia. The transitions from one cycle to the next cycle are characterized by rapid and pervasive changes termed, in this chapter, “major chaotic tectonic events.” These events appear to be related to the necking or breaking apart of the formerly sub- ducted slab at shallow depth, the resulting delamination of the plate margin, and the onset of a new subduction cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle
    Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle Feasibility Study: Part 1 - Downtown Transit Center & Downtown Circulator Shuttle (Part of CEPPA #5) DRAFTDecember 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. Downtown Columbia Transit Center ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Downtown Columbia Circulator Shuttle ............................................................................................... 12 Appendix A. Regional Transit System Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Appendix B. Regional Transit Market Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 Appendix C. Transit Circulator Design ................................................................................................................ 64 Appendix D. Transit Center Site Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 764 Appendix E. Transit Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 79 DRAFT Page i• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. Table of Figures Figure 1 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Bus Service Performance Review
    2021 Wake Transit-Funded Bus Services Annual Performance Review – Town of Cary Discussion Disposition Matrix Project Route/Project CAMPO Question Project Sponsor Response/Disposition Sponsor Route 4: High House Road's productivity is starting The Town discussed the myriad of challenges facing Route 4’s performance. These include a hit to ridership during the pandemic as a result of not to rebound from its pandemic slump. Does current serving the Cary Senior Center next to Bond Park. During the quarters in which the senior center was not served, on-time performance was stellar. The ridership data follow the trend of relatively stronger senior center poses operational challenges via an unprotected left turn on High House Road and due to the pace of boarding and alighting. Service TO004-A: Sunday Service – mid-day and weekend ridership? If not, how do you providing direct access to shopping centers and residential communities that deviates from the route’s directness of travel along the corridor has also All Routes, Holiday Hours explain the increase in productivity? While posed challenges to successful on-time performance. Town staff removed a U-turn on Maynard Rd and has recommended removing some of the and Extended Paratransit; productivity is improving, Route 4 is still not where it shopping center deviations to increase on-time performance. It was further noted that a good amount of the on-time underperformance noted in Q3 of TO004-B: Increase Midday should be, and neither is its on-time performance. FY21 could be a result of operator error, as service changes with new turn-by-turn instructions were initiated during the quarter, and it takes time for Frequencies How does the Town plan on increasing productivity operators to get used to the changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Resources of Fluorine in the United States
    Geology and Resources of Fluorine in the United States GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 933 COVER PHOTOGRAPHS 1. Asbestos ore 8. Aluminum ore, bauxite, Georgia 1 2 3 4 2. Lead ore, Balmat mine, N . Y. 9. Native copper ore, Keweenawan 5 6 3. Chromite-chromium ore, Washington Peninsula, Mich. 4. Zinc ore, Friedensville, Pa. 10. Porphyry molybdenum ore, Colorado 7 8 5. Banded iron-formation, Palmer, 11. Zinc ore, Edwards, N. Y. Mich. 12. Manganese nodules, ocean floor 9 10 6. Ribbon asbestos ore, Quebec, Canada 13. Botryoidal fluorite ore, Poncha Springs, Colo. 11 12 13 14 7. Manganese ore, banded rhodochrosite 14. Tungsten ore, North Carolina Geology and Resources of Fluorine in the United States Edited by DANIEL R. SHAWE With sections by D. R. SHAWE, R. E. VAN ALSTINE, R. G. WORL, A. V. HEYL, R. D. TRACE, R. L. PARKER, W. R. GRIFFITTS, C. L. SAINSBURY, and J. B. CATHCART GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 933 An evaluation of the geochemistry, geographic distribution, and geologic environments of fluorine, and descriptions of major United States fluorine mineral deposits UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 76-600061 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02901-4 APPRAISAL OF MINERAL RESOURCES Continuing appraisal of the mineral resources of the United States is conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey in accordance with the provisions of the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-631, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • AZSTRIP Chapter 3.Pdf
    Arizona Strip Draft Plan/DEIS Chapter 3: Affected Environment CHAPTER 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT.................................3.1 RESOURCES .......................................................................................... 3.1 AIR .......................................................................................................................................3.1 Overview...........................................................................................................................3.1 Parashant Air.....................................................................................................................3.2 Vermilion Air ....................................................................................................................3.2 Arizona Strip FO Air.........................................................................................................3.2 WATER................................................................................................................................3.3 Overview...........................................................................................................................3.3 Water Rights .................................................................................................................3.3 Surface Water Resources ..............................................................................................3.3 Ground Water Resources ..............................................................................................3.6 Parashant
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon Council Oa Where to Go Camping Guide
    GRAND CANYON COUNCIL OA WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE GRAND CANYON COUNCIL, BSA OA WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE Table of Contents Introduction to The Order of the Arrow ....................................................................... 1 Wipala Wiki, The Man .................................................................................................. 1 General Information ...................................................................................................... 3 Desert Survival Safety Tips ........................................................................................... 4 Further Information ....................................................................................................... 4 Contact Agencies and Organizations ............................................................................. 5 National Forests ............................................................................................................. 5 U. S. Department Of The Interior - Bureau Of Land Management ................................ 7 Maricopa County Parks And Recreation System: .......................................................... 8 Arizona State Parks: .................................................................................................... 10 National Parks & National Monuments: ...................................................................... 11 Tribal Jurisdictions: ..................................................................................................... 13 On the Road: National
    [Show full text]
  • Park County Hazard Mitigation Plan Final Draft
    PARK COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FINAL DRAFT PREPARED FOR Park County City of Livingston Tow n o f C l yd e Pa r k AUGUST 2018 respec.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Disasters can strike at any time in any place. In many cases, actions can be taken before disasters strike to reduce or eliminate the negative impacts. These actions, termed mitigation, often protect life, property, the economy, or other values. The Park County Hazard Mitigation Plan addresses sixteen major hazards with respect to risk and vulnerabilities countywide, including in the City of Livingston and the Town of Clyde Park. Through a collaborative planning process, the Park County hazards were identified, researched, and profiled. The major hazards are each profiled in terms of their description, history, probability and magnitude, vulnerabilities, and data limitations. The vulnerabilities to critical facilities, critical infrastructure, existing structures, the population, values, and future development are evaluated for each hazard. Based on the probability and extent of potential impacts identified in the risk assessment, the prioritizations of hazards within Park County are outlined in Table ES-6-1 through Table ES-6-3. Table ES-6-1. Park County Hazard Prioritizations Level Hazard High Hazard Flooding Wildfire Earthquake Hazardous Materials Release Wind Winter Storms and Extended Cold Moderate Hazard Severe Thunderstorms and Tornadoes Communicable Disease and Bioterrorism Avalanche and Landslide Drought Low Hazard Utility Outage Volcano Terrorism, Civil Unrest, and Violence Aviation Accident Railroad Accident ES-1 Table ES-6-2. City of Livingston Hazard Prioritizations Level Hazard High Hazard Flooding Earthquake Hazardous Materials Release Wind Winter Storms and Extended Cold Moderate Hazard Communicable Disease and Bioterrorism Severe Thunderstorms and Tornadoes Urban Fire Drought Utility Outage Low Hazard Ground Transportation Accident Wildfire Aviation Accident Terrorism, Civil Unrest, and Violence Railroad Accident Volcano Table ES-6-3.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study: Part 2 - Downtown Columbia to Oakland Mills Multimodal Connection (Part of CEPPA #3)
    Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Feasibility Study: Part 2 - Downtown Columbia to Oakland Mills Multimodal Connection (Part of CEPPA #3) •^*. Note: This is an initial draft report presented to Howard County by the Howard Hughes Corporation. The County staff is in the October 2011 process of reviewing this document and has not yet accepted it. Any questions or concerns regarding this draft report should be directed to the Howard Hughes Corporation. N NELSON NYGAARD Table off Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1. Purpose for a Route 29 Connection Study ......,.............................,.......,.................,...................,..2 Chapter 2. Findings......................................................................................................................................^^ Chapters. Recommendations .....................,....,..,..........................,.......>.......................................,........,......., 10 Appendix A. Transit Service Impacts.................................................................................................................. 12 Appendix B. Evaluation of Non-hflotorized Access ...................................................,................,,......................24 Appendix C. Trip-MakEng Impact....................................................,,...............................................,.........^ Appendix D. Preliminary Engineering Assessment...........................................................................,..............^?
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of Pipe Spring National Monument and the Western Kaibab-Paiute Indian Reservation, Mohave County, Arizona
    Geologic Map of Pipe Spring National Monument and the Western Kaibab-Paiute Indian Reservation, Mohave County, Arizona By George H. Billingsley, Susan S. Priest, and Tracey J. Felger Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service and the Kaibab-Paiute Tribe Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 2863 2004 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey INTRODUCTION This geologic map is a product of a cooperative project between the U.S. Geological Survey, the National Park Service, and the Kaibab-Paiute Indian Tribe to provide a uniform quality geologic database for this part of the Uinkaret Plateau of the Arizona Strip north of Grand Canyon National Park and west of Fredonia, Arizona. The geologic data will be useful for future geologic, biologic, and hydrologic resource studies of this area conducted by the National Park Service, the Kaibab-Paiute Tribe, the citizens of Moccasin, Arizona, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the State of Arizona, local private ranching organizations, and individuals. Sandy Canyon Wash, Bitter Seeps Wash, and Bulrush Wash are the principal drainages in the map area that flow south into Kanab Creek, the principal drainage of this region that flows south toward the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Moccasin Mountain and Moquith Mountain (Moki Mountain on old maps) form highland plateaus west and north of Moccasin and Kaibab, Arizona. The Vermilion Cliffs are a prominent topographic expression of the landscape that marks the southern and eastern edges of Moccasin and Moquith Mountains. The north edge of the map area abuts the Utah/Arizona State line. Access to the map area is by Arizona State Highway 389 and a short paved road to Pipe Spring National Monument and the towns of Kaibab and Moccasin, Arizona (fig.
    [Show full text]