DOCSLIB.ORG

ZONING MAP R O N 20 LYN 20 CARO CLE ITTLES E CIR L L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ZONING MAP R O N 20 LYN 20 CARO CLE ITTLES E CIR L L A B C D E F G H I J K L M N B-4 SCITUATE 21 21 NORWELL River h t ZONING MAP r o N 20 LYN 20 CARO CLE ITTLES E CIR L L S LANE C N R Town of R I O T C I N V I E M N E E T A A R A R E N T S D M D I T H I M W D S O R U A E O N H P A N A T R Y I C D D E E I R E L R V Trount's I T O V C STREE I SPRING R L N R D S E T T Y Island D LE A R T W A R 8 A D Marshfield, Massachusetts W B N T E A S N SL A A I E L 19 D 19 A M 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles SU O M N S M T E S R R EE P T O E I N G T D I 1 inch = 0.25 miles H U R R N D T O S R E R A R IV E D E B M O T C E A E AM ONS R D M T POINT S IVE U DR N G I N 18 O I R 18 N S B P Prepared By: T O S M S R W Lewis T A E T R E I C N T E E Pond P T S E S S E T E T O R R R P T S o E E T u S O t L U L H L M D h S T by: NMP T M E GL R R SPRING STREET WELL E E E W S R N R O H E N C S O T N A O Massachusetts Geographic Information Systems O ND R T HIGHLA D R R R L O N E T EET L STR C I H W E I T H L E R-1 L L 17 E R L 17 O T N E S P C A E A LE A C R E A N T B-4 S T O Y HIGHLAND STREET A R E A THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS THE ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF E S i N E CO N T W RN I W U v H S S ILL T A M LA A T R Y T NE E e E E R M MARSHFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS, REFERRED TO IN THE ZONING BYLAW OF M T E E P E r D R E L R S Wales T L T E EDGE S L P W A THE TOWN OF MARSHFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS WHICH WAS APPROVED OOD O A R E S LANE N I Pond N W N A IN N TE E A W R S W N G O IE AT THE APRIL 27, 2015 ANNUAL TOWN MEETING. L O D V F E L D T A W N E E E NE RA U U D N E R E S G VE o G L O A IN R N E E R A C Y R R A G A P L Y E A V V U D M D U E N L R A I O V A A P S P E V E E R L N N F P O T H R T A G E R O r W N I T A O S D D H E R T A E R I A T N U D E D W E O D R A G T U S E R W I N A N T E O V N E D L L t N N N I Y A R E A C E I E A N J A O T E R L T ATTEST: P A T R A Y E L O K I N U R H E N S V S S E C Y P O T E IL D R C A T T R S H E F T O E A T N A E W EP A O E A H RANDALLS H D R N T I S R O U E C E C R E G A T T W h I M L T L T I D CREEK R O D T A H V E O AT S R O U A C P N P E N 16 A E E WAY L E N L A L T E E W O U A D E A A R T I M R T T T R LL O M L A H G 16 T T C E E ____________________________ P S R T S I T A B O S M U H A A E O D I R T L R P T E N A I A R C R R C L S R E D R P R A C I H O H I R T T S A T E E A A Town Clerk N A E D T A M T L R T P S E E I E T A L E E R R E M W M D D E T B i L W R U E N E T I E R A T A A A v V R O R A E E D S Y N H R A E E A N H D S E X L E O J O O B E e R C P L T Y A M O I E A S Y F L C C R L L M T F IR A L S YE L E T S WA I E E S E L L E T N A S C A D R D E Y MA U LAN R O E N This map is a zoning map, its purpose is for regulatory interpretation K P O Note: r K H OA M U Y A R L A M H U A Y S AD A O ST T P O P E A T R RO D R P L O A R E D S I E N A N A N E O T B W D R K L PL = Property Line of district boundaries. K E R R I W E O P R O O R E I S W D N L O H C T N E D W A W O E E H O D S I D T A N L O A U L T O IG A A A D BU R R M H E CL = Centerline N D R W D E F O T A R C D S O O R L E D O Y T A D L O R E T D ER ET R E A F E SLP = Straight Line Projection Final determinations regarding interpretation of any and all Local D D R I E ST D A V R CE E D D N A E T B AR EW T R A S O R T and State Laws pertaining to this map shall be made by the O O O SLC = Straight Line Connection S Y E L A N O E D R 15 R P A H T S OA G D R E E D L C H EA M R Humarock T L H W A I O D W Y R S O S A R A appropriate department. Wetland boundaries shown are R E M C T L D A R D E H U O A A S D I L O R R 15 I A E T R R H W E I D A W T E N C C C O E R F D E L I Distances are from centerlines of streets or approximate and based on aerial photography. Field inspection U H Y D D A Y E L E N R S H R T D I I A L N G E I B O A B L D S N D Y A H R E A M I H A A R A R L B D A T I A RO -N 3 A P A is required for precise delineation. A A M O from centerlines of intersections unless L V O R R L L R D R I D D D W L R O W T E O R R E O I W R T A E S A O A N Y PIN D A D A CA O D otherwise noted NON D E L D CHET A Y E R A L L P P O I H N TRA L PL O IL A S Y Y R A E R I H L The Property lines shown on this map are not intended to be used K L M A R S L E A B Y C R Y E NAPIER O V N A I L A I R B R W D H for legal property boundary determinations or parcel level analysis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Massachusetts Commercial Fishing Port Profiles
    MASSACHUSETTS COMMERCIAL FISHING PORT PROFILES The Massachusetts Commercial Fishing Port Profiles were developed through a collaboration between the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, the University of Massachusetts Boston’s Urban Harbors Institute, and the Cape Cod Commercial Fishermen’s Alliance. Using data from commercial regional permits, the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program’s (ACCSP) Standard Atlantic Fisheries Information System (SAFIS) Dealer Database, and harbormaster and fishermen surveys, these profiles provide an overview of the commercial fishing activity and infrastructure within each municipality. The Port Profiles are part of a larger report which describes the status of the Commonwealth’s commercial fishing and port infrastructure, as well as how profile data can inform policy, programming, funding, infrastructure improvements, and other important industry- related decisions. For the full report, visit the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries website. Key Terms: Permitted Harvesters: Commercially permitted harvesters residing in the municipality Vessels: Commercially permitted vessels with the municipality listed as the homeport Trips: Discrete commercial trips unloading fish or shellfish in this municipality Active Permitted Harvesters: Commercially permitted harvesters with at least one reported trans- action in a given year Active Dealers: Permitted dealers with at least one reported purchase from a harvester in a given year Ex-Vessel Value: Total amount ($) paid directly to permitted harvesters by dealers at the first point of sale file Port Port SCITUATE Pro Located on the South Shore, Scituate has three harbors: Scituate, North River, and South River- Humarock. Permitted commercial fisheries, which may or may not be active during the survey period, include: Lobster Pot, Dragger, Gillnetter, Clam Dredge, Scallop Dredge, Rod & Reel, For Hire/ Charter.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Michael Graikoski and Porter Hoagland1 I. Introduction Along The
    COMPARING POLICIES FOR ENCOURAGING RETREAT FROM THE MASSACHUSETTS COAST Michael Graikoski and Porter Hoagland1 I. Introduction Along the US Atlantic coast, the lands and infrastructure located on barrier islands and beaches and in backbay estuarine environments face mounting threats from king tides, storm surges, and sea-level rise.2 From the late 19th century to the present, sea-level rise on the United States’ Atlantic coast has been more rapid than any other century-scale increase over the last 2000 years.3 Even slight increases in sea-level rise now have been hypothesized to significantly increase the risks of coastal flooding in many places.4 In New England, some of the most severe northeast storms (“nor’easters”) have become notorious for consequent extreme losses of coastal properties. Some 1 Michael Graikoski, Guest Student, Marine Policy Center, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution & Porter Hoagland, Senior Research Specialist, Marine Policy Center, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. This article was prepared under award number NA10OAR4170083 (WHOI Sea Grant Omnibus) from the US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Northeast Regional Sea Grant Consortium project 2014-R/P-NERR- 14-1-REG); award number AGS-1518503 from the US National Science Foundation (Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems [CNH]); award number OCE-1333826 from the US National Science Foundation (Science and Engineering for Sustainability [SEES]) to the Virginia Institute of Marine Science; and with support from the J. Seward Johnson Fund in Support of the Marine Policy Center. The authors thank Chris Hein, John Duff, Di Jin, Peter Rosen, Andy Fallon, Billy Phalen, and Sarah Ertle for helpful insights and suggestions and Jun Qiu for help with the map of Plum Island in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scituate's Coast in 2070
    AUGUST 2020 A Vision for Scituate’s Coast in 2070 1 APhoto Vision courtesy for Scituate’sof Theresa O’Connor, Coast in Flickr. 2070 | August 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................... 2 Ten-year Action Plan ................................................... 36 Acknowledgments ......................................................... 3 Priorities and Wrestling With Trade-offs to Achieve a Resilient Future .................................... 37 Executive Summary ..................................... 4 Overarching Considerations ...................................... 37 Key components of the community’s vision Impermanence ........................................................ 37 for Scituate’s coast in 2070 ......................................... 6 Coastal Connectivity .............................................. 38 The Vision: A Vibrant and Prioritizing Beaches ............................................... 38 Resilient Coast .............................................. 8 The Harbor ................................................................ 41 Coastal Risks .............................................. 12 Zoning ....................................................................... 42 Utilities ...................................................................... 42 Issues to Plan For .......................................................... 14 Managed Retreat .................................................... 43 Beach Erosion .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Downs Redevelopment
    SUFFOLK DOWN S REDEVELOPMENT Additional Information Document SEPTEMBER 16, 2019 PREPARED BY SUBMITTED TO IN ASSOCIATION WITH Boston Planning & DLA Piper Development Agency CBT Architects Beals and Thomas, Inc. Stoss Landscape Urbanism PROPONENT ARUP The McClellan Highway AKF Development Company, LLC SourceOne c/o The HYM Investment Group, LLC Vertex Haley & Aldrich Boston, MA 02114 Additional Information Document Suffolk Downs Redevelopment Boston, Massachusetts SUBMITTED TO Boston Redevelopment Authority, d/b/a Boston Planning and Development Agency One City Hall Square, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02201 PROPONENT The McClellan Highway Development Company, LLC c/o The HYM Investment Group, LLC One Congress Street, 11th floor Boston, MA 02114 PREPARED BY VHB 99 High Street, 10th Floor Boston, MA 02110 In association with: DLA Piper ARUP CBT Architects SourceOne Beals and Thomas, Inc. Vertex Stoss Landscape Urbanism Haley & Aldrich AKF September 16, 2019 Suffolk Downs Redevelopment Additional Information Document Table of Contents Additional Information Document 1.1 Summary of BPDA Review Process .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Master Plan Project Refinements Since Previous Filings ..................................................................... 2 1.3 PDA Master Plan Document Structure ....................................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Proposed Development Framework ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NSRWA October 01 Newsletter
    RiverWaAptril 200c8 h therivershed.org THE NORTH AND SOUTH RIVERS WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, INC. Looking Back and Looking Forward nnual report time is a great time to take stock of NSRWA’s many ac- complishments during 2007. With a small staff, a cadre of loyal volun- Here are some resolutions from some of teers, and an active, engaged board, we were able to see many projects our more prominent watershed citizens: come to fruition and many goals fulfilled. Some highlights: Kezia Bacon Bernstein, Mari- A• The opening of 50 more acres of clam flats in the North River; ner Newspapers Correspon- • The completion of an interactive Herring Kiosk for display at area libraries; dent - “This year I am trying to • Started the process for designation of a No Discharge Zone for the coastal waters be more vigilant about reducing of Marshfield, Scituate and Cohasset - including the North and South Rivers; and my use of plastic grocery bags. I • Successfully advocated for a condition to be placed on Scituate’s Water keep a mesh shopping bag in my Withdrawal Permit that requires the town to investigate restoring flows to sup- car at all times, and bring mesh port the herring run on First Herring Brook. and canvas bags along with me to the grocery store. The next step will be to use We added new events like our Cranberry Harvest Walk, the North to South these reusable shopping bags in places other than River Paddle, and Rivershed Jeopardy; saw signs installed to denote the Third Her- the grocery store.” ring Brook; installed more rain gardens in the watershed and on the South Shore; and continued to provide input on local and state permit processes for decreasing Representative Frank Hynes, impacts to the watershed from significant development projects.
    [Show full text]
  • DEP Bulletin, 07/25/01
    TABLE OF CONTENTS July 25, 2001 Volume 25 Issue 14 Application Codes and Permit Descriptions Pg. 2 General Application Milestone Codes Specific Decision Application Codes Permit Descriptions General Information Pg. 3 DEP Public Notices, Hearings and Events of Interest (Water Quality Pg. 8-13) Pg.4 - 13 Administrative Hearings and Appeals None at this time Environmental Impact Statement and Assessments (EIS and EA) Pg. 14 Permit Applications Filed or Acted Upon: Land Use Regulation Program CAFRA Permit Application Pg. 15 Freshwater Wetlands General Permit Pg. 17 Freshwater Wetlands Individual Permit Pg. 20 Freshwater Wetlands Letter of Interpretation Pg. 20 Freshwater Wetlands Transition Waiver Pg. 24 Stream Encroachment Pg. 26 Waterfront Development Pg. 29 Waterfront Development General Permit Pg. 32 Division of Water Quality Treatment Works Approval (TWA) Pg. 34 DEP Permit Liaisons and Other Governmental Contacts Inside Back Cover Acting Governor Donald T. DiFrancesco, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Robert C. Shinn, Jr., Commissioner General Application Milestone Codes Application Approved F = Complete for Filing M = Permit Modification Application Denied H = Public Hearing Date P = Permit Decision Date Application Withdrawal I = Additional Information Requested R = Complete for Review C = Cancelled L = Legal Appeal of Permit Decision T = Additional Information Received Specific Decision Application Codes AVE PLAN = Averaging Plan PA/SOW = Presence/Absence/State Open Waters Only FP/A = Footprint/Absence of Wet., Waters & Transition Area PA/T = Presence/Absence/Transition Area Only F/F = Farming/Forestry/Silviculture Exemption R = Reductions FP/P = Footprint/Wetlands Present REG = HMDC/Pinelands Exemption FP/SOW = Footprint/State Open Waters Present Only SPEC ACTIVITY = Special Activity (Linear Dev.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scituate's Coast in 2070
    A Vision for Scituate’s Coast in 2070 Draft for public review - July 2, 2020 1 DRAFT: Scituate 2070 Vision Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 The Vision: A Vibrant and Resilient Coast 7 Coastal Risks 11 Issues to Plan For 11 Beach erosion 11 Storm Impacts 14 Sea Level Rise 16 Property Damage 18 Critical Infrastructure 20 Implementation Considerations 21 Understand Resilience Strategies 22 Accommodate 22 Defend 23 Move 25 No intervention 26 Review and build on existing studies/plans 27 Ten-year action plan 29 Priorities and wrestling with trade-offs to achieve a resilient future 29 Impermanence 30 Coastal Connectivity 30 Prioritizing beaches 30 Community Support 31 Funding 32 Regulations 32 The Harbor 33 Zoning 34 Utilities 35 Managed Retreat 35 Coastal Community Character 36 Appendices 38 2 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT JULY 2020 Appendix A: Glossary of key terms 38 Appendix B: Community Engagement Process 39 Appendix C: Relevant land use regulations from other municipalities 44 3 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT JULY 2020 Acknowledgements Thank you to all Scituate residents who participated in this process and shared their input in any form to help shape this vision, particularly those who opened their homes to host and invited friends to a Neighborhood Gathering. Thank you to the Scituate Coastal Advisory Commission, especially the Chair, Louise Pfund Villani, for providing key insights and on-the-ground partnership to spread the word about the vision process through the Commission’s networks. This vision is the result of the shared efforts of a large project team: Kyle Boyd, the Town of Scituate Coastal Management Officer; John Ramsey, Principal Coastal Engineer and Morgan Simms, Coastal Scientist of Applied Coastal Research and Engineering; Josh Fiala, Principal Planner and Darci Schofield, Senior Environmental Planner of the Metropolitan Area Planning Council; Barbara Landau, Noble, Wickersham and Heart, LLP.
    [Show full text]
  • TO: Interested Parties FROM: Tom Ennis SUBJECT: 18 Neptune Road MOA with Massachusetts Historical Commission DATE: April 29
    TO: Interested Parties FROM: Tom Ennis SUBJECT: 18 Neptune Road MOA with Massachusetts Historical Commission DATE: April 29, 2008 Massport requests the opportunity to consult with the Massachuselts Historical Commission ("MHC") and, following an appropriate consultation process, to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement ("MOW) with the MHC with respect to 18 Neptune Road. To facilitate further public comment. Massport has submitted the draft MOA for publication in the Environmental Monitor on April 23,2008. The Environmental Monitor notice will provide for a 20 day public review and comment period ending on May 13,2008. All comments are to be sent to my attention. Thomas W. Ennis Senior Project Manager1 Senior Planner Massport One Harborside Drive East Boston, MA 02128 tennis@,mass~ort.com 617.568.3546 (direct) 617.568.31 15 (fax) At the conclusion of the public comment period, Massport will respond to all comments received and distribute the comments and Massport's response to comments to MHC, Boston Landmarks Commission. and all commenters. DRAFT 2.14.2008 Memorandum of Agreement between the Massachusetts Port Authority and the Massachusetts Historical Commission Regarding 18 Neptune Road East Boston, Massachusetts WHEREAS, the Massachusetts His~oricalCommission (MHC) has determined that the proposed project of the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) to improve safety at Logan by demolishing 18 Neptune Road, a 3-decker house, in East Boston, Massachusetts will have an adverse effect upon 18 Neptune Road pursuant to 950 CMR 71.05(a), a property that meet the criteria ofeligibility for listing in ihe National Register of Historic Places undcr Criteria A, B, and C at the local, state.
    [Show full text]
  • MDPH Beaches Annual Report 2008
    Marine and Freshwater Beach Testing in Massachusetts Annual Report: 2008 Season Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health Environmental Toxicology Program http://www.mass.gov/dph/topics/beaches.htm July 2009 PART ONE: THE MDPH/BEH BEACHES PROJECT 3 I. Overview ......................................................................................................5 II. Background ..................................................................................................6 A. Beach Water Quality & Health: the need for testing......................................................... 6 B. Establishment of the MDPH/BEHP Beaches Project ....................................................... 6 III. Beach Water Quality Monitoring...................................................................8 A. Sample collection..............................................................................................................8 B. Sample analysis................................................................................................................9 1. The MDPH contract laboratory program ...................................................................... 9 2. The use of indicators .................................................................................................... 9 3. Enterococci................................................................................................................... 10 4. E. coli...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marine and Freshwater Beach Testing in Massachusetts Annual Report
    Marine and Freshwater Beach Testing in Massachusetts Annual Report: 2015 Season Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health Environmental Toxicology Program http://www.mass.gov/dph/beaches May 2016 PART ONE: THE MDPH/BEH BEACHES PROJECT 4 I. Overview .......................................................................................................... 5 II. Background ...................................................................................................... 5 A. Beach Water Quality & Health: The Need for Testing ...................................................... 5 B. Establishment of the MDPH/BEH Beaches Project .......................................................... 6 III. Beach Water Quality Monitoring ....................................................................... 7 A. Sample collection .............................................................................................................. 7 B. Sample analysis ................................................................................................................ 7 1. The MDPH contract laboratory program .................................................................... 7 2. The use of indicators .................................................................................................. 7 3. Enterococci ................................................................................................................. 8 4. E. coli .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Resilient Scituate, Climate Vulnerability Assessment And
    Building a Resilient Scituate Climate Vulnerability Assessment and Action Plan March 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project was conducted by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) with funding from MAPC’s Planning for MetroFuture District Local Technical Assistance program. METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COUNCIL Officers President Keith Bergman Vice President Erin Wortman Secretary Sandra Hackman Treasurer Taber Keally Executive Director Marc D. Draisen Senior Environmental Planner Darci Schofield GIS/Data Analysis Darci Schofield and Eliza Wallace Town of Scituate Town Administrator James Boudreau Chair, Board of Selectmen Maura C. Curran STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Department of Public Works Kevin Cafferty Engineering Sean McCarthy Director of Planning and Economic Development Brad Washburn Chief of Scituate Fire/Emergency Manager John Murphy Chief of Scituate Police Michael Stewart Board of Health Director Jennifer Keefe Coastal Resource Officer Nancy Durfee Natural Resource and Conservation Officer Amy Walkey Building Commissioner Robert Vogel Council on Aging Director Linda Hayes Director of Facilities Kevin Kelly Recreation Director Maura Clancy Building a Resilient Scituate EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Climate change is the most compelling environmental, economic, and social issue of our time. Scituate, known for its numerous barrier beaches, prominent bedrock headlands, and rich cultural history, is one of the most vulnerable regions in Massachusetts. It is routinely hit hard with coastal storms causing massive storm surge and inundation with even just a lunar high tide. Projected sea level rise and changes in intensity of storm and precipitation events compel the need to Scituate, Winter Storm Riley, March 2018. Source: assess the vulnerability of Scituate’s people and places Simon Brewer as well as plan for protecting its future.
    [Show full text]
  • East Boston Community News: January 10, 1978. Volume 8
    C01111i1Uflity News VOLUME 8, NUMBER 8 ESTABLISHED 1970 JANUARY I 0- JANUARY 24, 1978 FREE Wa'rrant mysteriously disappears Landowner avoids arrest ; property still a dump heap by Michael Rezendes A warrant for the arrest of lots of proprety and lots of money. Louis DeSanctis has been issued He's crapping all over people here because he ignored a summons to and getting away with it." appear in Boston Housing Court. "Where can we go now?" asked DeSanctis faces charges that here- Ferullo. " We're very proud of our fused to comply with an order from neighborhood. We try to keep it up, the Boston Housing Authority (BHA) to keep it clean. We don't think we to clean up his property on the cor- have to live like this:' ner of Orleans and Haynes Streets. Turns nose up at law How.ever, the warrant has a~par- Anna DeFRonzo, Chairperson of ently disappeared somewh~re ;n t~e the Land Use Council, was also not p~per b~e~ucracy. of the city ~ en- surprised that the law was having no mmal diVISion. While the Housmg effect on Louis DeSanctis. "This Be it ever humble_ Court insists that warran~ no. 20994 man is alway~ turning his nose up so for the arrest of DeSanctis was . at the law," she said. DeFronzo ex­ 385 Frankfort St. was a nice place for the home of Mr. and Mrs. John issued on Dec. 15 and sent to pohce plained how, in another incident in Fagone- until the airport moved next door. The Fagone's three-decker headquarters, Mrs.
    [Show full text]