DOCSLIB.ORG

MLA and Extradition Treaty List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MLA and Extradition Treaty List INTERNATIONAL MLA & EXTRADITION AGREEMENTS THE UK IS PARTY TO Bilateral UK Extradition Agreements Algeria Haiti Panama Argentina Hong Kong SAR Paraguay Bolivia India Peru Brazil Iraq Philippines Chile Kosovo Thailand Colombia Liberia Uruguay Cuba Libya United Arab Emirates Ecuador Mexico United States of America N El Salvador Morocco - Guatemala Nicaragua - N - Indicates signed, but not yet in force Bilateral UK MLA Agreements Algeria Guyana* Paraguay* Antigua & Barbuda* Hong Kong SAR Philippines Argentina* India Romania* Australia* Ireland Saudi Arabia* Bahamas* Italy* Spain* Bahrain* Jordan Sweden* Barbados* Kazakhstan Thailand Brazil Libya Ukraine* Canada Malaysia United Arab Emirates Chile* Mexico 1* | 2* Uruguay* N China Morocco United States of America Colombia Netherlands* Vietnam Ecuador* Nigeria* - Grenada* Panama* - * - Indicates Restraint & Confiscation or Drug Trafficking MLA treaty N - Indicates signed, but not yet in force Updated April 2016, International Criminality Unit, Home Office 1 Key EU Measures European Arrest Warrant Framework Decision (2002/584/JHA) 2000 Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (‘MLAC’) & Protocol - Implementation - Extended to Norway and Iceland Freezing Order Framework Decision (2003/577/JHA) Confiscation Order Framework Decision (2006/783/JHA) Schengen Acquis - UK Participation in Articles 48-53 EU-Japan Agreement on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters - Implementation Key Council of Europe Multilateral Agreements the UK has Ratified 1957 Convention on Extradition – Reservations and Declarations - List of Signatories – Additional Protocol – Second Additional Protocol – Third Additional Protocol – Fourth Additional Protocol 1959 Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters - List of Signatories 1978 Additional Protocol to Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters - List of Signatories 2001 Second Additional Protocol to Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters - List of Signatories 2001 Convention on Cybercrime (“the Budapest Convention”) – List of Signatories 2005 Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism (“the Warsaw Convention”) – List of Signatories 1990 Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime - List of Signatories Key UN Multilateral Agreements the UK has Ratified 1988 United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ('Vienna Convention') - List of Signatories 2000 United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime 2000 ('UNTOC') - List of Signatories 2003 United Nations Convention against Corruption ('UNCAC') - List of Signatories Commonwealth Schemes 2011 Commonwealth Scheme Relating to Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ('Harare Scheme') 2002 Commonwealth Scheme Relating to Extradition ('London Scheme') Updated April 2016, International Criminality Unit, Home Office 2 Agreements Extended by UK Crown Dependencies Overseas Territories Channel Islands; 1957 Convention on Extradition Isle of Man Isle of Man; 1959 Convention on Mutual Jersey; None Assistance in Criminal Matters Guernsey 1978 Additional Protocol to European Convention on Mutual Jersey None Assistance in Criminal Matters British Virgin Islands; Cayman Islands; Isle of Man; Bermuda; Vienna Convention Jersey; Guernsey Turks & Caicos Islands; Anguilla; Montserrat Gibraltar; British Virgin Islands; Cayman Islands; Isle of Man; Falkland Islands; UNTOC Jersey; Guernsey Bermuda; Anguilla; Turks and Caicos Islands Isle of Man; UNCAC Jersey; British Virgin Islands Guernsey Hong Kong SAR Isle of Man None Mexico Isle of Man None Thailand Isle of Man None Ukraine Isle of Man None USA Isle of Man None Anguilla; USA-UK & Cayman Islands on British Virgin Islands; Mutual Assistance in Criminal None Matters Montserrat; Turks & Caicos Islands USA-Bermuda Mutual Legal N/A N/A Assistance Treaty See www.gov.uk/uk-treaties for further information Updated April 2016, International Criminality Unit, Home Office 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones
    The articles contained in Disarmament Forum are the sole responsibility of the individual authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the United Nations, UNIDIR, its staff members or sponsors. The names and designations of countries, territories, cities and areas employed in Disarmament Forum do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Printed at United Nations, Geneva GE.05-00859—June 2011—4,000 UNIDIR/2011/3 ISSN 1020-7287 Printed on recycled paper Table of contents 1 Editor’s note Kerstin Vignard Nuclear-weapon-free zones 3 Peeling the orange: regional paths to a nuclear-weapon-free world Michael Hamel-Green 15 The Treaty of Pelindaba: towards the full implementation of the African NWFZ Treaty Noël Stott 27 The Arctic: top of the world to be nuclear-weapon-free Jan Prawitz 39 Possible elements of an NWFZ in the Middle East Nabil Fahmy and Patricia Lewis 51 The role of civil society in promoting a WMDFZ in the Middle East Chen Kane 63 UNIDIR focus Editor’s note Kerstin Vignard Nuclear-weapon-free zones (NWFZs)—from the 1967 Treaty of Tlatelolco to the 2006 Treaty of Semipalatinsk—are an important and concrete contribution to the nuclear disarmament regime. There has been renewed interest in the establishment of new zones, with talk of a zone in the Arctic and in the Middle East. Progress with current NWFZs is also being made—the protocols to the Treaty of Pelindaba were submitted to the US Senate in May 2011 for consent to ratification, making the United States the final nuclear-weapon state to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick
    [Show full text]
  • KUNGL KRIGSVETENSKAPS- AKADEMIENS Handlingar Och
    Anvisningar till författare KUNGL KRIGSVETENSKAPSAKADEMIENS HANDLINGAR OCH TIDSKRIFT KUNGL Ur Svenska Krigsmanna Sällskapets Handlingar 1797 Carl Deléns Tryckeri Stockholm Författaren ansvarar för att artikel som insän- KRIGSVETENSKAPS- ds är språkgranskad och genomarbetad och sänder originalmanuskript i Word till redak- AKADEMIENS Vi gustaf adolph med Guds nåde, Sveriges, tionen på [email protected]. Författarens namn, Handlingar och Tidskrift Götes och Vendes Konung, m m. Arfving till adress, e-postadress, telefon- och faxnummer Danmark och Norrige, Hertig till Schleswig, an ges i mailet. Författare till inträdesan- NR 4/2013 Holstein, m m. förande och årliga redo visningar bör begränsa antal tecken (inkl blanksteg) till högst 30 000 THE ROYAL Göre veterligt: att såsom Vi med mycket nöje resp 60 000. inhämtat den berömliga omsorg, som det inrät- SWEDISH ACADEMY tade Svenska Krigsmanna Sällskapet föresatt sig Vetenskapliga artiklar inom Akademiens att hafva ospard, till förbättrande och utvid- område bör innehålla 7-10 000 ord (d v s max OF WAR SCIENCES gande af de till Krigs Vettenskapen hörande 50 000 tecken utan blanksteg = max 60 000 Proceedings and Journal delar, hvarigenom så väl Krigsmän, hvilka tecken med blanksteg = max 20 A4-sidor i NR 4/2013 dels grånat under vapnen, dels jemte dessa på normal text med 12 punkter). Artikeln skall stridens bana af ära och mandom sig utmärkt, starta med ett abstract på engelska om det är som ock andre Embets- och Tjenstmän, kände en artikel skriven på skandinaviskt språk eller Multi-, tri- eller rent av åter bipolärt? för deras grundliga insigter, nu beflita sig, att på skandinaviskt språk om artikeln är skriven av Mats Bergquist under fredens lugn bidraga till allänt väl; Alltså, på engelska.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones
    The articles contained in Disarmament Forum are the sole responsibility of the individual authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the United Nations, UNIDIR, its staff members or sponsors. The names and designations of countries, territories, cities and areas employed in Disarmament Forum do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Printed at United Nations, Geneva GE.05-00859—June 2011—4,000 UNIDIR/2011/3 ISSN 1020-7287 Printed on recycled paper Table of contents 1 Editor’s note Kerstin Vignard Nuclear-weapon-free zones 3 Peeling the orange: regional paths to a nuclear-weapon-free world Michael Hamel-Green 15 The Treaty of Pelindaba: towards the full implementation of the African NWFZ Treaty Noël Stott 27 The Arctic: top of the world to be nuclear-weapon-free Jan Prawitz 39 Possible elements of an NWFZ in the Middle East Nabil Fahmy and Patricia Lewis 51 The role of civil society in promoting a WMDFZ in the Middle East Chen Kane 63 UNIDIR focus Editor’s note Kerstin Vignard Nuclear-weapon-free zones (NWFZs)—from the 1967 Treaty of Tlatelolco to the 2006 Treaty of Semipalatinsk—are an important and concrete contribution to the nuclear disarmament regime. There has been renewed interest in the establishment of new zones, with talk of a zone in the Arctic and in the Middle East. Progress with current NWFZs is also being made—the protocols to the Treaty of Pelindaba were submitted to the US Senate in May 2011 for consent to ratification, making the United States the final nuclear-weapon state to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Copenhagen Arctic NWFZ Report
    CONFERENCE ON AN ARCTIC NUCLEAR-WEAPON-FREE ZONE COPENHAGEN, 10-11 AUGUST, 2009 Arranged by the Danish Institute for International Studies, Parliamentary Network for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament, the Danish and Canadian National Groups of Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, the Swedish Branch of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, and the International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms, with financial support from the Hermod Lannung Foundation. PROGRAM August 10, Danish Institute for International Studies Strandgade 71, 1401 Copenhagen K Lunch: 12.00-12.30 Closed Round Table Discussions (12.30-15.00) Chair: Alexa McDonough 12.30-12.40: Introductions 12.40-13.10: Hon Matt Robson Former New Zealand Disarmament Minister 13.10-13.30: Erik Gant, Acting Executive Secretary Arctic Council Indigenous Peoples Secretariat 13.30-13.50: Dr. Jan Prawitz, Swedish National Group Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs 13.50-14.00: Discussion 14.00-14.15: Break 14.15-14.35: Torbjørn Graff Hugo Norske Leger Mot Atomv˚aben and Middle Powers Initiative 14.35-14.50: Prof. Gunnar Westberg, Director at Large International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War 14.50-15.00: Discussion Public Meeting (15.30-17.30) Chair: Cindy Vestergaard 15.30-15.40: Cindy Vestergaard Danish Institute for International Studies Introduction of the speakers and organizations 15.40-16.00: Prof. Michael Hamel-Green Executive Dean Victoria University, Australia 16.00-16.20: Dr. Adele Buckley Canadian National Group Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs 16.20-16.35: Break 16.35-16.55: Steven Staples, President The Rideau Institute on International Affairs, Canada 16.55-17.30: Discussion from the floor August 11, H.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Control of Outer Space Joe C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Kentucky Kentucky Law Journal Volume 52 | Issue 2 Article 6 1963 Legal Control of Outer Space Joe C. Savage University of Kentucky Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Air and Space Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Savage, Joe C. (1963) "Legal Control of Outer Space," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 52 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol52/iss2/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Notes LEGAL CONTROL OF OUTER SPACE In keeping with the general proposition that many of man's pur- plexing problems have been caused because physical science has usually advanced at a faster pace than the science by which man governs himself, the modern assault on the vast unknown of space threatens to catch man unprepared. In the very dawn of the day in which man will be both working and living in space, he is without rules by which his life must be governed. It is important that these rules be formulated before that day when living in space for extended periods of time becomes a reality. This note will explore both the unknowns of space and the unknowns of space law as it exists today.
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland, the Kingdom of Norway and the United Ireland, the Kingdom Of
    1 . 1 . 73 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 2/ 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COUNCIL DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES of 1 January 1973 adjusting the instruments concerning the accession of new Member States to the European Communities THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Republic of Germany, the French Republic, the Ita­ lian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Having regard to the Treaty between the Kingdom Kingdom of the Netherlands (Member States of the of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the European Communities), the Kingdom of Denmark, French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Ireland , the Kingdom of Norway and the United Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Nether­ Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland con­ lands (Member States of the European Communities), cerning the accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of Ireland, the Kingdom of Norway and the United Norway and the United Kingdom of Great Britain Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to and Northern Ireland concerning the accession of the the European Economic Community and to the Euro­ Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of Nor­ pean Atomic Energy Community : way and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the European Economic Com­ munity and to the European Atomic Energy Com­ 'Article 3 munitary, and in particular Article 2 thereof ; Having regard to the Decision of the Council of the This Treaty, drawn up in a single original
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K. 1996 Classification of Countries of Citizenship
    303 Appendix K Appendix K. 1996 Classification of Countries of Citizenship Country of Citizenship (Single Citizenship) Canada Canada, by birth Canada, by naturalization Other countries of citizenship Afghanistan Comoros Honduras Albania Congo Hong Kong 7 Algeria Costa Rica Hungary Andorra Côte d’Ivoire 2 Iceland Angola Croatia India Antigua and Barbuda Cuba Indonesia Argentina Cyprus Iran Armenia Czech Republic Iraq Australia Czechoslovakia, n.i.e. 3 Ireland, Republic of (Eire) Austria Denmark 4 Israel Azerbaijan Djibouti Italy Bahamas Dominica Jamaica Bahrain Dominican Republic Japan Bangladesh Ecuador Jordan Barbados Egypt Kazakstan Belarus El Salvador Kenya Belgium Equatorial Guinea Kiribati Belize Eritrea Korea, North Benin Estonia Korea, South Bhutan Ethiopia Kuwait Bolivia Fiji Kyrgyzstan Bosnia and Herzegovina Finland Laos Botswana France and Dependencies 5 Latvia Brazil French responses 6 Lebanon Brunei Darussalam Gabon Lesotho Bulgaria Gambia Liberia Burkina Faso Georgia Libya Burundi Germany Liechtenstein Cambodia 1 Ghana Lithuania Cameroon Greece Luxembourg Cape Verde Grenada Macedonia 8 Central African Republic Guatemala Madagascar Chad Guinea Malawi Chile Guinea-Bissau Malaysia China, People’s Republic of Guyana Maldives Colombia Haiti Mali Singapore Statistics Canada – Cat. No. 92-351-UIE 1996 Census Dictionary – Final Edition 304 Appendix K Malta Slovakia Marshall Islands Slovenia Mauritania Solomon Islands Mauritius Somalia Mexico South Africa, Republic of Micronesia, Federated States of Spain Moldova, Republic of Sri Lanka Monaco Stateless 16 Mongolia Sudan Morocco Suriname Mozambique Swaziland Myanmar 9 Sweden Namibia Switzerland Nauru Syria Nepal Taiwan Netherlands and Dependencies 10 Tajikistan New Zealand and Dependencies 11 Tanzania, United Republic of Nicaragua Thailand Niger Togo Nigeria Tonga Norway Trinidad and Tobago Oman Tunisia Pakistan Turkey Palau 12 Turkmenistan Palestine/West Bank/Gaza Strip 13 Tuvalu Panama U.S.S.R., n.i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Icsid/8 Contracting States and Measures Taken By
    ICSID/8 CONTRACTING STATES AND MEASURES TAKEN BY THEM FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE CONVENTION (July 2020) Attached are listings, prepared by the Secretariat pursuant to Administrative and Financial Regulation 20, of: Contracting States, including dates of entry into force for each of them of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (Art. 68 of the Convention) - ICSID/8-A Exclusions of Territories by Contracting States (Art. 70 of the Convention) - ICSID/8-B Designations by Contracting States Regarding Constituent Subdivisions or Agencies (Art. 25(1) and (3) of the Convention) - ICSID/8-C Notifications Concerning Classes of Disputes Considered Suitable or Unsuitable for Submission to the Centre (Art. 25(4) of the Convention) - ICSID/8-D Designations of Courts or Other Authorities Competent for the Recognition and Enforcement of Awards Rendered Pursuant to the Convention (Art. 54(2) of the Convention) - ICSID/8-E Legislative or Other Measures Relating to the Convention (Art. 69 of the Convention) - ICSID/8-F ICSID/8-A CONTRACTING STATES Listed below are the 155 Contracting States, together with the dates on which the Convention entered into force for them: Entry into Force Contracting State of Convention Afghanistan July 25, 1968 Albania November 14, 1991 Algeria March 22, 1996 Argentina November 18, 1994 Armenia October 16, 1992 Australia June 1, 1991 Austria June 24, 1971 Azerbaijan October 18, 1992 Bahamas, The November 18, 1995 Bahrain March 15, 1996 Bangladesh April 26, 1980 Barbados
    [Show full text]
  • (1) Application of CMS to Overseas Territories/Autonomous Regions of Parties (2) Reservations Regarding Species in the CMS Appendices
    (1) Application of CMS to Overseas Territories/Autonomous Regions of Parties (2) Reservations regarding species in the CMS Appendices Country Territories Application of CMS Reservations regarding species, and date entered Argentina Lama vicugna (Appendix I): 10.10.91 BGBl. 1994 II, p. 776 Australia Christmas Island, Cocos Islands, Norfolk Commonwealth of Australia, its Territories and Post-COP11 (2014) Australia entered a Island, Lord Howe Island, Coral Sea Island territorial waters reservation on the listing on Appendix II of the Territory, Ashmore and Cartier Islands, Heard Source: Australian national report to COP5 Bigeye thresher shark (Alopias superciliosus), Territory, Mcdonald Islands, Australian Common thresher shark (A. vulpinus), Pelagic Antarctic Territory thresher shark (A. pelagicus), Scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) and the Great hammerhead shark (S. mokarran). The notification to the German Foreign Office was dated 1 December 2014; the Note Verbale of the Foreign Office was dated 21 January 2015. Bolivia Vicugna vicugna (Appendix I): On accession: 01.03.03 Chile Easter Island, Juan Fernandez Islands, Islas de los Desventurados, Isla Sala y Gomez; Antarctic (53-90 W) China (not Party Hong Kong Hong Kong: In accordance with China/United to CMS) Kingdom joint declaration and the Note Verbale of June 1997 Cuba Chelonia mydas, Caretta caretta and Eretmochelys imbricata (Appendix I and II) On accession: 01.02.08 Denmark Faeroes and Greenland CMS does not apply to the Faeroes nor to Note verbale from DK embassy to FRG dated Greenland, whose autonomous authorities are 20.12.02: responsible for nature conservation matters in Amendments in regard of these regions. Balaenoptera bonaerensis (Appendix II), B.
    [Show full text]
  • Inuit, Danish, and European Subjects in the Making
    Privileges, Rights and Advantages: Inuit, Danish, and European Subjects in the Making Hanne Petersen 1 A Privileged Time ……….……….……….……….……….………. 206 2 The “Devolution” of the “Danish Empire” and the Situation of Greenland ……….……….……….…………. 207 3 Differential Rights and Multiple Identities – Subjects in Process in the Conglomerate State of Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands ……………. 209 4 Privilege & Subjecthood ……….……….……….……….………… 211 5 Equal Rights and Modern Citizenship ……….……….…………. 211 6 Multiple Selves in Complex Legal Contexts ……….……….…….. 212 7 Postmodern Privileges and the New Elites ……….……….……… 213 8 Overlapping and Post-national Legal Regimes ……….………….. 214 9 Connecting Mobile and Privileged Inuit/Humans in Stratified Societies? ……….……….……….……….…………... 215 10 European Legal Culture in Transformation ……….…………….. 216 References ……….……….……….……….……….……….………. 217 Scandinavian Studies In Law © 1999-2012 206 Hanne Petersen: Privileges, Rights and Advantages 1 A Privileged Time In March 1998 I bought a book in the only bookshop in Nuuk, the capital of Greenland. It was written or edited by the husband of the most famous contemporary Greenlandic artist, Aka Høegh, born in 1947, who might actually be called the national artist of Greenland.1 Her husband, Ivars Silis, is an engineer, who was born in 1940 in Riga. His parents fled from Latvia to Denmark in 1944, and he didn’t see Latvia again until 1985. He grew up in Denmark and was trained as an engineer. After having worked for 3 years as a geophysicist he specialised in polar expeditions and polar photography and has since worked as a photographer, writer and TV- producer. In 1976 he married Aka Høegh, and now lives in Qaqortoq, Southern Greenland. The book I bought was published in 1992 and was called “Letters from Latvia” consisting of about 22 letters written to Ivars Silis by a Latvian woman in the period from 1988 – 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • The Islands of the Danish Realm: the Quest for Sovereignty in Iceland, Greenland, and the Faroe Islands
    The Islands of the Danish Realm: The Quest for Sovereignty in Iceland, Greenland, and the Faroe Islands by Masters of Arts in Island Studies Thesis Candidate Ryan Boulter University of Prince Edward Island April 28, 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Library and Bibliothèque et 1^1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-32082-2 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-32082-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce,Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve,sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet,distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform,et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]