DOCSLIB.ORG

Carles Puigdemont, President of Catalonia in Exile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carles Puigdemont, President of Catalonia in Exile Case 15- Carles Puigdemont, President of Catalonia in exile Image source: Wikimedia Commons The 130th President of the “Generalitat de Catalunya”, is currently in exile in Belgium after the German justice refused to extradite him to Spain. On his complaint before UN’s Human Rights Committee, Carles Puigdemont reports that Spain has infringed his right to stand for election, his right to go into partnership with other politicians and parties with a shared goal (Catalonia becoming independent from Spain), and his right to freedom of peaceful political expression in support of the independence of Catalonia. The president, who has been dismissed by the Spanish government after declaring independence, was elected again on 21st December for a new term. Spanish authorities impeded his re-election even though he has never been convicted for any crime or deprived of his political rights by a court of law. Description On 30 October, three days after the declaration of independence in the Catalan Parliament, José Manuel Maza, the chief state prosecutor, lodged a complaint against President Puigdemont and his government before the Central Court in Madrid for alleged charges of rebellion, sedition and embezzlement of public funds. President Puigdemont left to Brussels with four of his ministers, reason why on 2 and 3 November they didn’t appear before the court in Madrid to testify. From Belgium, he asked the international community to get involved in the Catalan conflict, accusing the Spanish government of conducting an offensive against Catalan institutions and their officers and, at the same time, he justified their absence before Spanish justice saying that they wouldn’t have a fair trial. The Judge Carmen Lamela issued a European Arrest Warrant against Carles Puigdemont and the four ministers, who went before Belgian justice “not to evade justice’s action but only to defend themselves in a fair and impartial process” as hey said. Brussels first-instance judge provisionally released them before giving a final response to the extradition request. Before the reply, Spanish justice revoked the European Arrest Warrant but not the Spanish one, by which if the persons accused would tread Spanish soil they could be arrested. President Puigdemont, from Brussels, stood for the elections called by Spanish government on 21 December as the leading candidate of Junts per Catalunya, a new political party. Despite the fact that his group came second in the elections, just behind extreme right-wing unionist party Ciudadanos, pro-independence politicians still held the majority in the Parliament, so he became the candidate for President. However, he couldn’t be physically in the chamber during the investiture, so he was banned from taking the office –as well as Jordi Sànchez, the second on the party list, who was in pretrial detention. On 23 March 2018, taking advantage of the fact that Carles Puigdemont was in Finland, the examining magistrate Pablo Llarena issued a new Arrest Warrant for rebellion and funds’ embezzlement. Two days later while, President Puigdemont was coming back to Brussels, he was arrested in Germany. On 5 April, the Schleswig-Holstein’s court refused to extradite him for rebellion and he was set free on 6 April with precautionary measures. Judge Llarena decided to reduce President Puigdemont’s charge (from rebellion to sedition) but the court also refused this offense and chose to preserve the possibility to extradite him only on the basis of misappropriation of public funds. That’s the reason why judge Pablo Llarena dropped again the European Arrest Warrant and President Carles Puigdemont came back to Brussels. However, judge Llarena suspended him and the other defendants from their duties. Before In his role of Catalonia’s President, Carles Puigdemont was the main promoter of Catalonia’s independence referendum on 1 October 2017 as pro-independence parties, who held the majority in the Parliament, had promised in their electoral rolls. The referendum was held in the middle of great police violence and 90% of votes were “yes”. That same day, Puigdemont said he would take the results to the Parliament. Ten days later, Puigdemont declared independence, but immediately after he withheld the effects of such a declaration, waiting for an international mediation which never arrived. On 21 October, the Spanish government announced the implementation of the Spanish Constitution section 155 which involved direct rule of Madrid on Catalonia; this was passed on 27 October by the Spanish Senate and the result was the de facto impeachment of Puigdemont and his ministers (even though they never bent to that decision). That same day, the Catalan Parliament declared the independence of Catalonia. The outcome Knowing for a fact that should he decide to come back to Spain he would surely be arrested and that he would have what he deemed an unfair trial, Catalonia’s President decided to stay back in Brussels. From there, he leads an international campaign to denounce Spain’s lack of democracy and to reclaim Catalan governmental institutions. He also pushes policies aiming at the materialization of the Catalan Republic and defends civil and politic rights from “El Consell de la República” (Republic’s Council). Violated laws Two of the fundamental rights that have been violated to President Carles Puigdemont as well as to the members of his government and of the Parliament of Catalonia are, on the one hand, the right to political participation, since the government he presided over was dismissed and Parliament dissolved based on the application by the Spanish Senate on October 27, 2017 of (direct rule over Catalonia’s) Article 155 of the Spanish Constitution. This precept does not provide for any of the two above mentioned measures undertaken. Moreover, the right to presumption of innocence was also violated since although President Puigdemont made himself available to the judicial authorities of Belgium, as soon as he reached that country, yet Spanish justice still considers him as a "fugitive of justice" and takes for granted his condition of guilty based on the orders it has dictated, whereas President Puigdemont has not yet been judged. Furthermore, Spain also violates the right to the personal freedom and integrity of the President, since in spite of always having presented himself before the judicial authorities of the countries he has travelled to and in spite of the arrest warrants dictated by the Supreme Court having been withdrawn, the Spanish authorities have not ceased using personal and technological tracking means to have him located, by which reason there are different judicial investigations open in various countries. With regard to the judicial process initiated against members of his government, MPs of the Parliament of Catalonia, and social leaders of civil society’s independentist associations for the alleged crimes of rebellion, sedition, embezzlement of public funds and disobedience (which will be soon brought to the courts), it has violated, in the first place, President Puigdemont’s right to effective legal protection; since he has not been allowed to defend himself from such serious charges before the Supreme Court as long as he would not hand himself over to the Spanish judicial authorities, in contravention of current legislation. The principle of criminal legality (which means that the acts of those who are accused must involve a specific crime in order to be able to initiate a judicial process) has been violated as well in his case. In this regard, it should be remembered that in the case of President Puigdemont’s detention in Germany, the Superior Court of Justice of Schleswig-Holstein ruled on July 12, 2018, that the alleged rebellion crime that was alleged against MHP Puigdemont does not exist in the present case and that it is up to the Spanish judicial authorities to investigate the alleged offence of public funds’ embezzlement. This German court’s ruling prompted the immediate withdrawal by the Spanish Supreme Court of the international arrest warrant that had been transferred to the German authorities as well as the others that had been sent to Belgium and Scotland for the extradition of other members of the Catalan government. Nevertheless, the Catalan Government members continue to be accused of these crimes by Spain, in spite of not being prosecuted because of these. Although at this time there is no international arrest warrant activated, the Spanish judicial authorities have once more violated President Puigdemont’s rights to political participation, since although in the elections of December 21, 2017 convened by the Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, he was elected as MP and was proposed to be restored to his lawful position of “Molt Honorable President of the Generalitat de Catalunya”, the Spanish Constitutional Court prevented President Puigdemont from taking office. For his part, the Supreme Court has suspended him as deputy considering him to be accountable for an alleged crime of rebellion, thus altering with this decision the parliamentary majorities chosen by Catalan voters and consequently violating their political rights as voters as well. References Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó. L’Enciclopèdia.cat (in Catalan): https://www.enciclopedia.cat/EC-GEC-0520804.xml Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó. Wikipèdia (in Catalan): https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carles_Puigdemont_i_Casamaj%C3%B3 Carles Puigdemont, from mayor of Girona to President of Catalonia La Vanguardia, 9 January 2016 (in Spanish): https://www.lavanguardia.com/politica/20160109/301290104228/carles-puigdemont-president- generalitat.html President Puigdemont: “I am committed to working to explain and to implement, to prepare and to guarantee, to stabilize and to calm” Generalitat de Catalunya, 12 January 2016 (in Catalan): http://www.president.cat/pres_gov/AppJava/president/actualitat/noticies/290123/president- puigdemont-comprometo-treballar-explicar-implicar-preparar-garantir-estabilitzar- asserenar.html?mode=static Parliament invests Carles Puigdemont as President of the Generalitat. Palau del Parlament, Sunday 10 January 2016.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Critical Discourse Analysis of Artur Mas's Selected
    Raymond Echitchi “Catalunya no és Espanya”: A critical discourse... 7 “CATALUNYA NO ÉS ESPANYA”: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF ARTUR MAS’S SELECTED SPEECHES Raymond Echitchi, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This article is a Critical Discourse Analysis of secessionist discourse in Catalonia in the light of a selection of speeches given by Artur Mas. This work aims at deciphering the linguistic strategies used by Mas to construct a separate Catalan identity in three of his speeches, namely his acceptance, inauguration and 2014 referendum speeches. The analysis of these speeches was carried out in the light of Ruth Wodak’s Discourse-historical Approach to Critical Discourse and yielded the identification of three sets strategies to which Artur Mas mostly resorts; singularisation and autonomisation strategies, assimilation and cohesivation strategies and finally continuation strategies. Keywords: Catalonia, sub-state nationalism, secessionism, Critical Discourse Analysis. Resumen: Este artículo analiza, mediante el Análisis Crítico del Discurso, las disertaciones secesionistas en Cataluña de los discursos de Artur Mas. En este trabajo, se pretende captar las estrategias lingüísticas utilizadas por Mas para construir una identidad catalana separada en tres discursos que presentó; en su investidura, su toma de posesión y antes de celebrar el referéndum de 2014. El análisis de estos discursos se llevó a cabo a la luz de la aproximación histórica discursiva de Ruth Wodak y dio lugar a la identificación de tres tipos de estrategias en estos discursos: las estrategias de singularización y autonomización, las estrategias de asimilación y cohesión y las estrategias de continuidad. Palabras clave: Cataluña, nacionalimo sub-estatal, secesionismo, Análisis Crítico del Discurso.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Contemporary Nationhood in the Museums and Heritage Centres of Catalonia Colin Breen*, Wes Forsythe**, John Raven***
    170 Constructing Contemporary Nationhood in the Museums and Heritage Centres of Catalonia Colin Breen*, Wes Forsythe**, John Raven*** Abstract Geographically, Spain consists of a complex mosaic of cultural identities and regional aspirations for varying degrees of autonomy and independence. Following the end of violent conflict in the Basque country, Catalonia has emerged as the most vocal region pursuing independence from the central Spanish state. Within the Catalan separatist movement, cultural heritage sites and objects have been appropriated to play an intrinsic role in supporting political aims, with a variety of cultural institutions and state-sponsored monumentality playing an active part in the formation and dissemination of particular identity-based narratives. These are centred around the themes of a separate and culturally distinct Catalan nation which has been subject to extended periods of oppression by the varying manifestations of the Spanish state. This study addresses the increasing use of museums and heritage institutions to support the concept of a separate and distinctive Catalan nation over the past decade. At various levels, from the subtle to the blatant, heritage institutions are propagating a message of cultural difference and past injustice against the Catalan people, and perform a more consciously active, overt and supportive role in the independence movement. Key words: Catalonia, museums, heritage, identity, nationhood Across contemporary Europe a range of nationalist and separatist movements are again gaining momentum (Borgen 2010). From calls for independence in Scotland and the divisive politics of the Flemish and Walloon communities in Belgium, to the continually complicated political mosaic of the Balkan states, there are now a myriad of movements striving for either greater or full autonomy for their region or peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentación De Powerpoint
    THE TRUTH ABOUT CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE Last update: 28 November 2019 This document is subject to the evolution of the events it contains and will be periodically updated. Please note the date of the last update and, if necessary, request the latest version from: [email protected] This edition has only been updated to include the sentences of the trial that were published on 14 October. The verb tenses of the previous version have been maintained, without prejudice to the fact that a last update can be made by adjusting the concordances. Contents CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE 1. Timeline of the Independence bid THE CATALAN INDEPENDENCE BID ON TRIAL 2. The acts of 2017 and their prosecution 3. The five Articles of Spain’s Criminal Code that landed the procès defendants in the dock 4. Safeguards for the accused during the trial 5. Independence and safeguards of the Spanish legal system 6. Private prosecution: What is it? 7. The trial and sentences THE TRUTH ABOUT SPAIN AND ITS CATALAN REGION 8. The secessionists’ falsehoods 9. Spain is a state made up of Autonomous Communities 10. The price Catalonia is paying for the independence bid 11. Spain in international rankings QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS APPENDIX CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE 1. Timeline of the Independence bid 11 SEPT Massive demonstration day (or Diada) for independence 2012 “Consultative process” • Promoted by the Catalan Regional 9 NOV Government [known as the Govern], presided by Artur Mas. 2014 Suspended by Spain’s Constitutional Court. • According to the Catalan regional administration [known as the Generalitat] 2,305,290 citizens voted and 80.76% of them voted in favour of independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 17Th June 2019 Dear Bureau Members of the European
    Brussels, 17th June 2019 Dear Bureau Members of the European Parliament, Newly elected MEPs Carles Puigdemont, Antoni Comín and Oriol Junqueras, have been prevented from taking office as Members of the European Parliament by the Spanish authorities after the European election on 26th of May. The list led by Carles Puigdemont and Antoni Comín received 1.025.411 votes, and the list led by Oriol Junqueras received 1.257.484 votes. On 14th of June 2019, elected MEP Oriol Junqueras –in pre-trial detention for 593 days for having organized the Catalan self-determination referendum in 2017– has been banned by the Spanish Supreme Court to leave the prison in order to take the MEP credential. Furthermore, on the 13th of June 2019, the Spanish Electoral Board imposed elected MEPs Carles Puigdemont and Antoni Comín –in exile since October 2017– to be personally in Madrid in order to take their seats as MEPs. The decisions taken by the Spanish authorities banning newly elected MEPs from taking office and attending to the European Parliament’s constitutive plenary session on the 2nd July 2019 are a clear violation of their political rights and a disregard of more than 2 million European citizens that voted for them. These acts of the Spanish authorities attempt against the political rights of the MEP-elected Carles Puigdemont, Oriol Junqueras, Antoni Comín and more than 2 million European citizens that voted for them. An unacceptable breach of the Rules of Procedures of the European Parliament, the consolidated Treaties of the EU, the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regions of Spain
    © 2017 American University Model United Nations Conference All rights reserved. No part of this background guide may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever without express written permission from the American University Model United Nations Conference Secretariat. Please direct all questions to [email protected] A NOTE Julia Clark Chair Estimats Diputats del Parlament de Catalunya, Dear Diputats of the Parliament of Catalonia, My name is Julia Clark and I’ll be serving as your Chair for the Parliament of Catalonia. I cannot wait to meet all of you in February. Time is of the essence and the Catalan Republic needs creating! As for a little bit about myself: MUN is my life! Last year, I served on the AmeriMUNC Secretariat as the Charges D’Affaires and currently I am an Assistant Head Delegate of the AU Model United Nations competitive travel team. I have done MUN for seven years, competing at 24 conferences across the US and Canada, and I once chaired a conference in the Netherlands! I’m proud to say that AmeriMUNC will be my eighth time chairing. Outside of MUN, I am also the President of my sorority, Phi Mu. If you have any questions about greek life or collegiate MUN, I’d love to chat via email or at the conference. I’m personally very excited to be forming our own new nation, the Catalan Republic. I just studied abroad for four months in Madrid, Spain and was at the center of the real life action surrounding the Catalan independence movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalonia, Spain and Europe on the Brink: Background, Facts, And
    Catalonia, Spain and Europe on the brink: background, facts, and consequences of the failed independence referendum, the Declaration of Independence, the arrest and jailing of Catalan leaders, the application of art 155 of the Spanish Constitution and the calling for elections on December 21 A series of first in history. Examples of “what is news” • On Sunday, October 1, Football Club Barcelona, world-known as “Barça”, multiple champion in Spanish, European and world competitions in the last decade, played for the first time since its foundation in 1899 at its Camp Nou stadium, • Catalan independence leaders were taken into custody in “sedition and rebellion” probe • Heads of grassroots pro-secession groups ANC and Omnium were investigated over September incidents Results • Imprisonment of Catalan independence leaders gives movement new momentum: • Asamblea Nacional Catalana (Jordi Sànchez) and • Òmnium Cultural (Jordi Cuixart), • Thousands march against decision to jail them • Spain’s Constitutional Court strikes down Catalan referendum law • Key background: • The Catalan Parliament had passed two laws • One would attempt to “disengage” the Catalan political system from Spain’s constitutional order • The second would outline the bases for a “Republican Constitution” of an independent Catalonia The Catalan Parliament factions • In the Parliament of Catalonia, parties explicitly supporting independence are: • Partit Demòcrata Europeu Català (Catalan European Democratic Party; PDeCAT), formerly named Convergència Democràtica de Catalunya
    [Show full text]
  • Osservatorio Settimanale
    Osservatorio settimanale Volerelaluna.it 27/04/2019 di: Elena Marisol Brandolini CRONACA DEL PROCESSO AGLI INDIPENDENTISTI CATALANI / 11 Undicesima settimana del processo all’indipendentismo catalano presso il Tribunal Supremo di Madrid: finita, almeno per il momento, la carrellata delle testimoninaze degli agenti di Policía Nacional e Guardia Civil, è il turno di rappresentanti delle istituzioni, dell’associazionismo, di ex- consiglieri della Generalitat. A sfilare davanti alla Corte sono politici come il vice-presidente della Generalitat Pere Aragonés, allora segretario alla consiglieria di Economia, che però non testimonia perché implicato in altre istruttorie riguardanti l’1 ottobre, e il vice-sindaco di Barcellona Gerardo Pisarello, candidato alle elezioni del 28 aprile per la Camera nella lista catalana En Comú Podem, collegata con Unidas- Podemos. O come le sindache di Vilanova i la Geltrú, Neus Lloveras, che nell’autunno catalano era presidente dell’AMI (Associació de Municipis per la Independència), e di Sant Vicenç dels Horts, Maite Aymerich, cittadina di residenza di Oriol Junqueras (imputato, già vicepresidente del Governo della Generalitat). O ancora, Joan Ignasi Elena, che fu coordinatore delPacte Nacional pel Referèndum, l’ultimo tentativo fatto dalla Catalogna per richiedere un referendum concordato con lo Stato e naufragato al principio dell’estate del 2017. A passare per il banco dei testimoni sono Maritxell Ruiz, consigliera della Presidenza fino al 14 luglio 2017, quando decise di rinunciare all’incarico per motivi personali che non avevano a che vedere con la celebrazione del referendum dell’1 ottobre, la quale dichiara che, pur essendo a quell’epoca evidente che ci sarebbe stato un aumento del conflitto con lo Stato, «nel Governo si parlava sempre di un referendum pattuito».
    [Show full text]
  • Girona Rebutja La Polèmica Moció Del Reagrupament I L'arrelament D'immigrats
    Girona rebutja la polèmica moció del reagrupament i l'arrelament d'immigrats El Partit Popular es queda sol defensant la moci El PSC, que hi ha donat suport a Salt i Figueres, hi vota en contra, com ERC i ICV, i CiU s'absté El ple de l'Ajuntament de Girona va rebutjar ahir a la nit la polèmica moció que han aprovat municipis com Salt o Figueres i en què es demana que es tinguin en compte els informes municipals per denegar les peticions de reagrupament familiar o d'arrelament dels ciutadans immigrats. Veray i Castel en la votaci坦 d'una de les La moci va arribar al ple de la mà del grup mocions que es van debatre al ple i en municipal del Partit Popular, que es va quedar sol qu竪 es van quedar sols. Foto: D.V. defensant la moci. El PSC va votar-hi en contra, un fet significatiu si es té en compte que la mateixa formaci va ser la que la va proposar i aprovar a Salt o la que hi va donar suport a Figueres. El portaveu del PSC, Joan Pluma, va justificar el vot negatiu perquè va qualificar la proposta de “brindis al sol sense propostes concretes” i va defensar la política de l'equip de govern per “seguir millorant la cohesi social treballant molt i parlant poc”. A més, considera que la llei actual “ja funciona” i recorda que l'Estat ja fa cas dels informes municipals que s'emeten. Aquesta defensa va comportar que la portaveu popular, Concepci Veray, acusés “d'hipocresia i incoherència” els socialistes per no haver-hi donat suport.
    [Show full text]
  • And Catalonia (Spain)
    MEMORANDUMMEMORANDUM D'ENTESAD'ENTESA MEMORANDUMMEMORANDUM OF OF UNDERSTANDING UNDERSTANDING ENTREENTRE EL GOVERNGOVERNRN DEDE CATALUNYACATALUNYA I IEL EL BETWEENBETWEEN THETHE STATESTATE OFOF CALIFORNIACALIFORNIA GOVERNGOVERN DE CALIFORNIA (EUA)(EUA) (USA)(USA) AND AND CATALONIA CATALONIA (SPAIN) (SPAIN) El GovernGovern dede Catalunya Catalunya (d'ara (d'ara endavant endavant The GovernmentGovernment ofof Catalonia Catalonia (hereinafter (hereinafter Catalunya), representat pelpel presidentpresident dede la la Catalonia),Catalonia), representedrepresented byby thethe PresidentPresident ofof GeneralitatGeneralitat dede Catalunya, ii elel GovernGovern dede thethe GovernmentGovernment of Catalonia,Catalonia, andand thethe "Estatl'Estat dede California California (d'ara (d ' araendavant endavant Government of of the StateState ofof California California California),California) , representatrepresentat pel governadorgovernador dede (hereinafter(hereinafter California)California) representedrepresented byby thethe I'Estat,l'Estat, d'arad'ara endavantendavant anomenatsanomenats elsels Governor,Governor, (hereinafter(hereinafter Signatories),Signatories), givengiven signants,signants, vistvist l'interesl'interes reciprocrecfproc d'aprofundir d'aprofundir thethe mutualmutual interestinterest ofof deepeningdeepening theirtheir tiesties ofof els llacosllar;:os d'amistatd'amistat existents,existents, friendship,friendship, MANIFESTENMANIFESTEN DECLAREDECLARE QueQue CaliforniaCalifornia tete elel producteproducte interiorinterior brut brut mes mes
    [Show full text]
  • The Catalan Funding Mechanism
    THE CATALAN FUNDING MECHANISM Ramon TREMOSA I BALCELLS Director of the Economic Theory Department University of Barcelona Contents Summary and introduction 1.- Economic growth and fiscal flows 2. Autonomous Spain: decentralising spending and centralising power 3.- An unchanged financing model 4.- Solidarity determined solely by the State 5.- Conditional tax office 6.- Central government investment not guaranteed 7.- Imprecise legal principle Conclusion: New Catalan financing? Too many unknowns Appendix: macroeconomic effects of the Catalan fiscal deficit with the Spanish State (2002-2010). Tables Bibliography 2 Abstract This paper sets out to analyse the Catalan Generalitat government’s autonomous financing model, which is the product of the new Catalan Statute of 2006. Rather than a change in the region’s financing model, this new Statute defines a cluster or series of financing models that are open to a broad array of possible interpretations, which range from a soft approach to several fiscal federalism mechanisms (in the case of a generous interpretation by the Spanish central government) to the reinforcement of the central government’s discretionary powers to allocate the resources of the common regime autonomous communities (in the case of a stricter interpretation by the Spanish central government). Thus, the improvement or even deterioration of the Generalitat’s autonomous financing in the future depends on the play of political majorities in the State and regional parliaments in Madrid and Barcelona, respectively. The hopes invested in the new Catalan Statute’s ability to insulate the region’s financing in the future from possible hostile absolute majorities in Madrid’s Chamber of Deputies (the most popular justification among Catalan political parties and social forces for a new autonomy statute) seem to fade in view of the final text.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Vicente FENOLL Universitat De València
    Dr. Carlos LÓPEZ-OLANO Universitat de València. Spain. [email protected] Dr. Vicente FENOLL Universitat de València. Spain. [email protected] Media polarization in the Catalan independence process. A comparative study of its treatment by RT La polarización mediática en el proceso de independencia en Cataluña. Estudio comparativo del tratamiento en RT Dates | Received: 06/11/2019 - Reviewed: 12/12/2019 - In press: 19/12/2020 - Published: 01/01/2020 Abstract Resumen The Catalan procés has undergone intense El procés catalán ha experimentado una intensa polarization in the media, both in the traditional polarización mediática, tanto en medios media and the social networks, where the Russian tradicionales como en redes sociales, donde la corporation RT has been accused of supporting corporación rusa RT ha sido acusada de apoyar the independence movement. From a al independentismo. Desde una perspectiva quantitative perspective, we have carried out a cuantitativa, realizamos un análisis comparado comparative analysis of the coverage of the de la cobertura en Facebook del procés catalán Catalan procés in Facebook by the corporations en las corporaciones RT, BBC y DW. A pesar de la RT, BBC and DW. In spite of RT’s proximity to the proximidad de RT con el independentismo, los independence movement, the results do not resultados no revelan diferencias significativas reveal significant differences between the media entre los medios. Asimismo, las reacciones de los corporations. Even so, users’ reactions to usuarios a las publicaciones en Facebook publications in Facebook suggest sympathy for sugieren su simpatía por el independentismo. Catalan independence. Keywords Palabras clave Catalonia; independence; RT; Facebook; Cataluña; independencia; RT; Facebook; misinformation desinformación López-Olano, C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Myths and Storytelling in Nation Building: the Campaign for the Independence of Catalonia from Spain (2012–2015)
    The Power of Myths and Storytelling in Nation Building: The Campaign for the Independence of Catalonia from Spain (2012–2015) César García Central Washington University ABSTRACT Background There is no nation without its origin story. The recent success of the Catalan campaign for independence (2012–2015) can be explained by a strong capacity to build and convey a story capable of informing, persuading, and eliciting emotional responses from Catalans and other Spaniards. Analysis The recent Catalan nationalism narrative has been forged by updating the foun - dational myths of Catalan nationalism through four main plots—quest, escape, revenge, and transformation—that with a pragmatic character have been able to integrate current affairs into the old myths. Conclusion and implications This article explores the elements of the new Catalan nation - alism narrative by analyzing the interaction of foundational myths, the use of master plots, current affairs, and the means of dissemination. Keywords Nation building; Storytelling; Spain; Separatism RÉSUMÉ Contexte Sans histoire d’origine, il n’y a pas de nation. Le succès récent de la campagne cata - lane pour l’indépendance (2012-2015) s’explique par une forte capacité à imaginer et diffuser une histoire propice à informer, persuader et toucher les Catalans et autres Espagnols. Analyse Le récit récent sur le nationalisme catalan résulte de la mise à jour de mythes fondateurs par l’entremise de quatre intrigues clés—quête, fuite, vengeance et transformation—qui de manière pragmatique ont réussi à resituer les vieux mythes dans l’actualité. Conclusion et implications Cet article explore les éléments du nouveau récit sous-tendant le nationalisme catalan en analysant les correspondances entre les mythes fondateurs, le re - cours à des intrigues clés, l’actualité et les modes de diffusion.
    [Show full text]