DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Issuing Annual Catch Limits To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Issuing Annual Catch Limits To DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For issuing annual catch limits to the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission for a subsistence hunt on bowhead whales for the years 2019 and beyond May 2018 Prepared by U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service DOC | NOAA | NMFS This page intentionally left blank. Bowhead Whale DEIS | May 2018 ES-ii DOC | NOAA | NMFS Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Issuing Annual Catch Limits to the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission for a Subsistence Hunt on Bowhead Whales for the Years 2019 and Beyond May 2018 Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Office of International Affairs and Seafood Inspection Responsible Official: John Henderschedt, Director Office of International Affairs and Seafood Inspection For Further Information Contact: Office of International Affairs and Seafood Inspection Attn: Carolyn Doherty National Marine Fisheries Service 1315 East West Highway, Room 10711 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 (301) 427-8385 Cooperating Agencies: Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission Abstract: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) proposes to issue annual catch limits to the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC) to allow continuation of its subsistence hunt for bowhead whales from the Western Arctic stock from 2019 onward, under the Whaling Convention Act (WCA) and the Cooperative Agreement with the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC), and subject to International Whaling Commission (IWC)-set catch limits. Under the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW), the IWC has adopted management principles for setting subsistence catch limits for the Western Arctic stock of bowhead whales based upon the needs of Native hunters in Alaskan villages and in Russian Federation villages along the Chukotka Peninsula, and may adopt catch limits for specific years. NMFS issues the AEWC the United States’ share of this catch limit. The subsequent hunt is managed under the WCA and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), cooperatively by NMFS and the AEWC. The purpose of this action is twofold: to manage the conservation and sustainable subsistence utilization of the Western Arctic stock of bowhead whales (as required under the ICRW, the WCA, the MMPA, and other applicable laws) and to fulfill the Federal Government’s trust responsibility to recognize the cultural and subsistence needs of Alaska Natives. Bowhead Whale DEIS | May 2018 ES-iii DOC | NOAA | NMFS The IWC will conduct its next meeting in September 2018 in Florianopolis, Brazil, and based on the management advice of the IWC Scientific Committee, is likely to adopt a catch limit for 2019 through 2024 or 2025 at the same or similar levels as the previous quota block. This DEIS considers five Alternatives and Alternative 4 is the preferred alternative. Under Alternative 4, NMFS would grant the AEWC the U.S. portion of a maximum annual strike limit of 100 strikes, i.e., 67 annual strikes plus up to 33 unused strikes from previous years which can be carried forward, subject to limits, and added to the annual strike quota of subsequent years. These strike limits would be subject to the U.S. portion of a maximum total of 336 landed whales over any six-year period. This Alternative is preferred because it meets the purpose and need of this action, and it achieves the socio-cultural benefits of the subsistence hunt at minimal environmental cost. Bowhead Whale DEIS | May 2018 ES-iv DOC | NOAA | NMFS This page intentionally left blank. Bowhead Whale DEIS | May 2018 ES-v DOC | NOAA | NMFS DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR ISSUING ANNUAL CATCH LIMITS TO THE ALASKA ESKIMO WHALING COMMISSION FOR A SUBSISTENCE HUNT ON BOWHEAD WHALES FOR THE YEARS 2019 AND BEYOND Prepared by U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service May 2018 Bowhead Whale DEIS | May 2018 ES-vi DOC | NOAA | NMFS This page intentionally left blank. Bowhead Whale DEIS | May 2018 ES-vii DOC | NOAA | NMFS List of Tables Table Number Table Title Page Number Table ES-1 Bowhead Whale Subsistence Harvest EIS Effects at a Glance ES-xxxii Table ES-2 Summary of Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects of the ES-xxxv Alternatives and Other Activities in the Project Area on Bowhead Whales Table ES-3 Summary of Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects of the ES-xxxviii Alternatives and Other Activities in the Project Area on Other Wildlife Table ES-4 Summary of Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects of the ES-xl Alternatives and Other Activities in the Project Area on the Sociocultural Environment Table 3.4-1 AEWC Community Population and Ethnicity 2000-2010 83 Table 3.4-2 Portion of AEWC Community Residents Living Below Poverty Level 84 Table 3.5-1 Estimated Edible Pounds of Bowhead Whale 2007 – 2017 86 Table 3.5-2 Community Subsistence Harvest Levels by Species Group (Pounds 87 per Capita) Table 3.5-3 Proportion of Subsistence Food Provided by Taxa 88 Table 3.5-4 Rates of Participation in Bowhead Subsistence Activities 89 Table 4.1-1 Criteria for Determining Impact Level for Effects on Bowhead 116 Whales Table 4.1-2 Criteria for Determining Impact Level for Effects on Other Wildlife 117 Table 4.1-3 Criteria for Determining Impact Level for Effects on Socio-cultural 118 Resources Table 4.1-4 Past, Present, and RFFAs Considered in the Impact Analyses 124 Table 4.1-5 RFFAs Considered in the Cumulative Impact Analyses 126 Table 4.6.3-1 Percentage occurrence of observed reactions by spring-migrating 160 bowhead and beluga whales to helicopter and fixed-wing aircraft, overall and by aircraft altitude and lateral distance Table 4.6.6-1 Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions Related to 169 Mining in the Project Area Table 4.11-1 Summary of Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects of the 199 Alternatives and Other Activities in the Project Area on Bowhead Whales Table 4.11-2 Summary of Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects of the 202 Alternatives and Other Activities in the Project Area on Other Wildlife Table 4.11-3 Summary of Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects of the 204 Bowhead Whale DEIS | May 2018 ES-viii DOC | NOAA | NMFS Alternatives and Other Activities in the Project Area on the Sociocultural Environment Bowhead Whale DEIS | May 2018 ES-ix DOC | NOAA | NMFS List of Figures Figure Number Figure Title Page Number Figure 1.1.2-1 Historic and Current Bowhead Whaling Villages in Alaska, Canada, 2 and the Russian Federation. Figure 3.2-1 Circumpolar area occupied by the four bowhead whale stocks 30 Figure 3.2.1-1 Abundance estimates for the Western Arctic stock of bowhead 32 whales, 1978-2011 (Givens et al. 2013), as computed from ice- based counts, acoustic data, and aerial transect data collected during bowhead whale spring migrations past Point Barrow, Alaska. Figure 3.2.1-2 Annual number of Western Arctic bowhead whales landed and 37 struck by Alaska Native villages in Alaska, 1998-2016. Figure 3.2.1-3 Range map for Western Arctic bowhead whales based on satellite 38 telemetry data. Figure 3.2.1-4 Core-use areas of Western Arctic bowhead whales (n = 54) tagged 40 with satellite transmitters (2006-2011). Figure 3.2.3-1 Number of bowhead whales landed by subsistence hunters in 44 the U.S., Canada and the Russian Federation, 1974-2016. Figure 3.2.4-1 Blubber concentrations of PCBs and DDTs determined in male 49 bowhead whales sampled in 1992 and 1993. Figure 3.2.7-1 Increase in Arctic vessel activity from 2008-2013 52 Figure 3.2.7-2 Vessel track lines for vessels of 400 gross tons or greater 53 (excluding fishing vessels), with proposed United States and Russian Federation two-way vessel traffic routes in the Bering Strait and Bering Sea shown in red. Figure 3.5-1 Bowhead whale subsistence use areas. U.S. Beaufort and Chukchi 92 Seas. 2011. Figure 3.5.2-1 Summary of the number of bowhead whales landed by year in 99 each village between 1974 and 2016. Figure 3.5.2-2 Total of Western Arctic bowhead whales landed by AEWC villages 101 from 1974-2016. Figure 3.5.2-3 Efficiency of the Western Arctic bowhead whale subsistence hunt, 104 1973- 2016 Figure 4.6.3-1 Received levels of underwater sound from (A) Bell 212 helicopter 159 and (B) Twin Otter fixed-wing aircraft flying directly overhead vs. aircraft altitude, hydrophone depth, and (for Twin Otter) airspeed. Bowhead Whale DEIS | May 2018 ES-x DOC | NOAA | NMFS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 2-D two-dimensional 3-D three-dimensional AAC Alaska Administrative Code ABF Alaska Board of Fisheries ACIA Arctic Climate Impact Assessment ADF&G Alaska Department of Fish and Game AEWC Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission AGIA Alaska Gasline Inducement Act AMAP Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme AOGCM Atmosphere-Ocean Global Climate Model APP Alaska Pipeline Project ASAMM Aerial Survey of Arctic Marine Mammals ASAP Alaska Stand Alone Gas Pipeline AWI Animal Welfare Institute AWSC Alaska Waterways Safety Committee BCBS Bering-Chuckchi-Beaufort Seas Bcf billion cubic feet BOEM Bureau of Ocean Energy Management BOEMRE Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement BPXA BP Exploration BWASP Bowhead Whale Aerial Survey Project CAA Conflict Avoidance Agreement Cd cadmium CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations CI Confidence Interval cm centimeters CO2 carbon dioxide COP ConocoPhillips Company COPA ConocoPhillips
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toxic Menu – Contamination of Whale Meat
    Toxic Menu Contamination of Whale Meat and Impact on Consumers’ Health ry, P rcu CB e a m n d n i D h D c i T . R wh at ale me A review by Dr. Sandra Altherr and Sigrid Lüber Baird‘s beaked whale, hunted and consumed in Japan, despite high burdens of PCB and mercury © Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) © 2009, 2012 (2nd edition) Title: Jana Rudnick (Pro Wildlife), Photo from EIA Text: Dr. Sandra Altherr (Pro Wildlife) and Sigrid Lüber (OceanCare) Pro Wildlife OceanCare Kidlerstr. 2, D-81371 Munich, Germany Oberdorfstr. 16, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland Phone: +49(089)81299-507 Phone: +41 (044) 78066-88 [email protected] [email protected] www.prowildlife.de www.oceancare.org Acknowledgements: The authors want to thank • Claire Bass (World Society for the Protection of Animals, UK) • Sakae Hemmi (Elsa Nature Conservancy, Japan) • Betina Johne (Pro Wildlife, Germany) • Clare Perry (Environmental Investigation Agency, UK) • Annelise Sorg (Canadian Marine Environment Protection Society, Canada) and other persons, who want to remain unnamed, for their helpful contribution of information, comments and photos. - 2 - Toxic Menu — Contamination of Whale Meat and Impact on Consumers’ Health Content 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Contaminants and pathogens in whales .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the EXPERT MEETING to DEVELOP TECHNICAL GUIDELINES to REDUCE BYCATCH of MARINE MAMMALS in CAPTURE FISHERIES
    FIAO/R1289 (En) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report ISSN 2070-6987 Report of the EXPERT MEETING TO DEVELOP TECHNICAL GUIDELINES TO REDUCE BYCATCH OF MARINE MAMMALS IN CAPTURE FISHERIES Rome, Italy, 17−19 September 2019 Cover illustration: Alberto Gennari (2019) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 1289 FIAO/R1289 (En) Report of the EXPERT MEETING TO DEVELOP TECHNICAL GUIDELINES TO REDUCE BYCATCH OF MARINE MAMMALS IN CAPTURE FISHERIES Rome, Italy, 17–19 September 2019 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2020 Required citation: FAO. 2020. Report of the Expert Meeting to Develop Technical Guidelines to Reduce Bycatch of Marine Mammals in Capture Fisheries. Rome, Italy, 17–19 September 2019. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 1289, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/CA7620EN The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN: 978-92-5-132150-8 ISSN: 2070-6987 (print) © FAO, 2020 Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Japan Supports Whaling
    An edited version of this paper has been accepted for publication in the Journal of International Wildlife and Policy WHY JAPAN SUPPORTS WHALING Keiko Hirata* 1. INTRODUCTION Japan is one of the few states in the world that adamantly supports whaling. For decades, Tokyo has steadfastly maintained its right to whale and has aggressively lobbied the International Whaling Commission (IWC) for a resumption of commercial whaling. Japan’s pro-whaling stance has invited strong international criticism from both environmental groups and Western governments, many of which view Tokyo as obstructing international efforts to protect whales. Why has Japan adhered to a pro-whaling policy that has brought the country international condemnation? Its defiant pro-whaling stance is not consistent with its internationally cooperative position on other environmental matters. For the past decade, Tokyo has been a key player in international environmental regimes, such as those to combat ozone depletion and global warming.1 If Japan is serious about environmental protection and desires to play a role as a ‘green contributor,’2 why hasn’t it embraced the anti-whaling norm, 3 thereby joining other states in wildlife protection and assuming a larger role in global environmental leadership? *Research Fellow, Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, Irvine, California, USA. E-mail: [email protected]. 1 Isao Miyaoka, 1980s and Early 1990s: Changing from an Eco-outlaw to a Green Contributor, 16 NEWSL. INST. SOC. SCI. U. TOKYO, 7-10 (1999). 2 Id. at 7. 3 Robert L. Friedheim, Introduction: The IWC as a Contested Regime, in TOWARD A SUSTAINABLE WHALING REGIME, 1-45 (Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 30 June 2005 ISSN 1192-3539
    Number 30 June 2005 ISSN 1192-3539 Editorial MAKAH TRIBE PURSUES RIGHT TO HUNT The Digest continues to provide news on whaling research to On February 14 2005, the Makah Indian tribe of Washington researchers and libraries in many countries, and we appreciate State filed an application with the National Oceanic and hearing from researchers regarding the work they are doing in Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) requesting a waiver of diverse study areas. We aim to publish information on whaling the take moratorium under the Marine Mammal Protection Act research carried out in the social sciences, history, archeology for a ceremonial and subsistence harvest of up to 20 gray and law, and in other relevant fields (such as, e.g., the whales in any 5-year period. performing and graphic arts). A glance at this issue of the Digest indicates that research on whaling in diverse research The filing of this application is the result of a series of federal fields continues, published and communicated at whaling court rulings in a lawsuit filed by the Fund for Animals and the symposia and workshops, and that whaling and whale cultures Humane Society of the United States on January 10, 2002. The continue in various countries and provide opportunities today most recent court decision on June 7, 2004 left the Makah with for those wanting to study in situ whaling. Readers are two alternatives: (1) comply with the court decision by (a) reminded that the INWR Website, www.ualberta.ca/~inwr/ preparing a full environmental impact statement (EIS) and (b) contains further information on whaling and whaling research, seek either a permit or a permit waiver under the Marine and useful links to other whaling research websites Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) for taking a quota of gray whales; or (2) appeal the court decision to the US Supreme LITTLE DIOMEDE ISLANDERS LAND SEASON’S Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Driven by Demand
    Driven By Demand Dolphin drive hunts in Japan and the involvement of the aquarium industry WDCS, the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society April 2006 All information in this report may be reproduced for educational purposes provided written credit is given to WDCS. The report itself and photographs contained within it may not be reproduced without the prior written approval of WDCS. We have taken care to ensure the accuracy of information within this report. We are concerned about whale and dolphin hunts wherever they occur, and welcome comments, updates and new information. Please send information to: [email protected]. WDCS UK Brookfield House, 38 St. Paul Street, Chippenham, Wiltshire SN15 1LJ, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)1249 449 500, Fax: +44 (0)1249 449 501, www.wdcs.org WDCS North America 70 East Falmouth Hwy, East Falmouth, MA 02536, USA Tel: +1 508 548 8328, Fax: +1 508 457 1988, www.whales.org WDCS Germany WDCS, Altostr. 43, 81245 Munich, Germany Tel: +49 (0) 89 6100 2393, Fax: +49 (0) 89 6100 2394, www.wdcs-de.org WDCS Australasia WDCS, PO Box 720, Port Adelaide Business Centre, Port Adelaide, South Australia 5015, Australia Tel: 1300 360 442, Fax: 088 44 74 211, www.wdcs.org.au WDCS Argentina WDCS, Francisco Beiro 3731, (B1636CHM) - Olivos, Prov. Buenos Aires, Argentina Tel+Fax: +54 11 479 06 870, www.wdcs.org Acknowledgements This report was written by Courtney S.Vail and Denise Risch, and edited by Cathy Williamson. Japanese translation was provided by: Sakae Hemmi, Elsa Nature Conservancy. Our sincere thanks to Sakae Hemmi, Nanami Kurasawa, Sue Fisher, Mark Simmonds, Hardy Jones, Philippa Brakes, Clare Perry and Nicolas Entrup for their help in the production of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Artisanal Whaling in the Atlantic: a Comparative Study of Culture, Conflict, and Conservation in St
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2010 Artisanal whaling in the Atlantic: a comparative study of culture, conflict, and conservation in St. Vincent and the Faroe Islands Russell Fielding Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Fielding, Russell, "Artisanal whaling in the Atlantic: a comparative study of culture, conflict, and conservation in St. Vincent and the Faroe Islands" (2010). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 368. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/368 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. ARTISANAL WHALING IN THE ATLANTIC: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CULTURE, CONFLICT, AND CONSERVATION IN ST. VINCENT AND THE FAROE ISLANDS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology Russell Fielding B.S., University of Florida, 2000 M.A., University of Montana, 2005 December, 2010 Dedicated to my mother, who first took me to the sea and taught me to explore. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation has benefitted from the assistance, advice, inspiration, and effort of many people. Kent Mathewson, my advisor and major professor, provided the kind of leadership and direction under which I work best, offering guidance when necessary and allowing me to chart my own course when I was able.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking Ranks
    BREAKING RANKS Denmark goes it alone on whaling policy An analysis by Dr. Sandra Altherr and Jennifer Lonsdale A report commissioned by ABOUT THE AUTHORS GLOSSARY Sandra Altherr, biologist, co-founder of Pro ASW Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling Wildlife. Has attended annual meetings of the International Whaling Commission EU European Union (IWC) as an observer since 1998. CITES Convention on International Trade Jennifer Lonsdale, co-founder and director in Endangered Species of Wild of the Environmental Investigation Agency. Fauna and Flora Has attended meetings of the International Whaling Commission as an observer since IWC International Whaling Commission 1987. JARPA Japanese Whale Research Program The Report was commissioned by under Special Permit in the SHIFTING VALUES, an agency based in Antarctic Vienna, Austria, working towards a shift of our values within species and JARPN Japanese Whale Research Program environmental conservation and animal under Special Permit in the protection efforts. western North Pacific JCNB The Canada/Greenland Joint Commission on Conservation and Management of Narwhal and Shifting Values e.U. Beluga Scheidlstr. 45 A-1180 Vienna NAMMCO The North Atlantic Marine Austria Mammal Commission [email protected] www.shiftingvalues.com NGO Non-Governmental Organisation RMP Revised Management Procedure - the computer model by which catch limits for baleen whales would be calculated should commercial whaling be resumed RMS Revised Management Scheme - the scheme that would manage commercial whaling should it be resumed in the future . STCW Small-Type Coastal Whaling 2 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 2. INTRODUCTION 7 3. DENMARK'S BALANCING ACT BETWEEN ITS OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AND THE EU 9 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the International Cachalot Assessment Research Planning Workshop, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 1-3 March 2005
    Report of the International Cachalot Assessment Research Planning Workshop, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 1-3 March 2005 October 2005 Tim D. Smith Randall R. Reeves John L. Bannister Editors U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Report of the International Cachalot Assessment Research Planning Workshop, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 1-3 March 2005 Tim D. Smith1, Randall R. Reeves2, and John L. Bannister3, Editors 1 National Marine Fisheries Service, 166 Water St., Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA 2 Okapi Wildlife Associates, 27 Chandler Ln., Hudson, Quebec I0P 1H0, CANADA 3 The Western Australia Museum, Francis St., Perth, Western Australia 6000, AUSTRALIA October 2005 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-72 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., USN (ret.), Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere National Marine Fisheries Service William T. Hogarth, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries The preparation of this document was supported jointly by the US Marine Mammal Commission and the US National Marine Fisheries Service. MMC support was through Grant No. 19Z007 to the University of New Hampshire, Professor A.A. Rosenberg and Affiliate Professor Tim D. Smith, Principal Investigators. NMFS support was through the Protected Species Branch of the Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole, MA. This document will initially be issued only online. It will be available at: http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/online.htm It will be available in PDF format so that a paper copy can be easily printed out. It may subsequently be issued on paper as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Whaling in St. Vincent and the Grenadines
    HUMPBACK WHALING IN BEQUIA, ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES The IWC’s Failed Responsibility A report for the International Whaling Commission by the Animal Welfare Institute | June 2012 HUMPbacK WHALING INTRODUCTION Since the Caribbean nation of St Vincent and the Grenadines (hereafter SVG) joined the International Whaling Commission (IWC or Commission) IN BEQUIA, in 1981, whalers on the Grenadine island of Bequia are reported to have struck and landed twenty-nine humpback whales (Megaptera ST VINCENT AND novaeangliae) and struck and lost at least five more. While this constitutes a small removal from a population of whales estimated to number over THE GRENADINES 11,0001, it does not excuse the IWC’s three decades of inattention to many problems with the hunt, including the illegal killing of at least nine The IWC’s Failed Responsibility humpback whale calves. Humpback whaling in SVG commenced in 1875 as a primarily commercial activity. In the 1970s, the focus of the operation changed from whale oil for export to meat and blubber for domestic consumption and a small scale artisinal hunt continued in Bequia despite the IWC’s ban on hunting North Atlantic humpback whales. In 1987, the IWC accepted SVG’s assurances that the Bequian whaling operation would not outlast its last surviving harpooner and granted SVG an Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling (ASW) quotai. Since then, the IWC has renewed SVG’s ‘temporary’ ASW quota six more times, including doubling it in 2002, two years after the harpooner died. With the exception of a handful of countries
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint for U.S. Whale Conservation
    BLUEPRINT FOR U.S. WHALE CONSERVATION AN ACTION PLAN FOR THE U.S. GOVERNMENT International Fund for Animal Welfare 1350 Connecticut Ave, NW Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: 202.296.3860 Fax: 202.296.3802 Email: [email protected] www.ifaw.org/whaleblueprint 1 CONTENTS List of Abbreviations and Acronyms 3 Executive Summary 4 Whales and Whale Protection 6 Status of the World’s Whales 6 Why Save Whales? 7 International Agreements and Forums 10 U.S. Legislation 12 Threats to Whales 15 Commercial Whaling 16 Entanglement and Entrapment 21 Ship Strikes and Shipping Noise 27 Navy Sonar 36 Oil, Gas, and Other Industrial Development 40 Pollution 47 Cumulative Threats 53 Complete List of Recommendations 57 2 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ACCOBAMS Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans in the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea, and contiguous Atlantic Area ALWTRT Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Team APPS Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships ATBA Area to be Avoided ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry BOEM U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management CCAMLR Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora COLREGS International Regulations for Avoiding Collisions at Sea CWA Clean Water Act EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act IFAW International Fund for Animal Welfare ICRW International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling IMO International Maritime Organization IWC
    [Show full text]
  • TWENTY FIFTH MEETING of the COUNCIL 5 – 6 April 2017, Nuuk, Greenland
    NAMMCO/25/23 TWENTY FIFTH MEETING OF THE COUNCIL 5 – 6 April 2017, Nuuk, Greenland DOCUMENT 23 MARINE MAMMALS: A MULTIFACETED RESOURCE Submitted by: Planning Group for the Marine Mammals as Food Resources (MMFR) project Action requested: ▪ For information Background: This document has been developed by the Secretariat and it represents part I of the MMFR project. The document has been reviewed by the Planning Group. Marine Mammals: A multifaceted Resource © NAMMCO Greenlandic boy with dried humpback whale meat © F. Ugarte Marine Mammals: A multifaceted Resource 1. Why not consider Marine Mammals? 5 2. Marine Mammals, an Abundant and Logical Resource in the North 6 2.1 An abundant resource in a world of scarcity. 6 2.2 An abundant resource 7 2.2.1 Pinnipeds 7 2.2.2 Cetaceans 9 2.3 A highly valued and therefore carefully managed resource 9 2.3.1 Strict management of resources ensuring healthy stocks 9 2.3.2 A responsibly managed resource – welfare issues 13 3. Marine Mammals, a Green-Blue Resource 15 3.1 A natural Resource 15 3.2 A Resource in balance with the Environment 15 3.3 A Resource contributing to Blue Growth 17 4. Marine Mammals under Threat 18 4.1 A Changing Arctic as Background 19 4.2 Uncontrolled direct removals 19 4.2.1 Ship strikes 20 4.2.2 By-catch and entanglement 20 4.3 Insidious undercover anthropogenic stressors 20 4.3.1 The soft killers: contaminants and microplastics 20 4.3.2 Anthropogenic disturbances 21 4.4 Precautionary management needed and an appeal to join forces 22 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 32 June 2006 ISSN 1192-3539
    Number 32 June 2006 ISSN 1192-3539 EDITORIAL This month, the 58th Annual Meeting of the International soon as possible in accordance with advice from Norwegian Whaling Commission (IWC) convenes in St. Kitts and Nevis. It scientists. was during the 42nd IWC meeting held in Noordwijk, the Norwegian whalers will also be allowed to hunt minke whales Netherlands, in 1990 that a decision was taken to establish the in a larger part of the Jan Mayen area beginning in 2006, a International Network for Whaling Research. It was decided the measure requested by whalers following small catches in this network would produce a newsletter, organize conferences and region of the Greenland Sea in previous years; in 2005, only workshops on whaling topics, and seek to interest an academic five of the allowable catch of 145 animals in the Jan Mayen press in publishing books on whaling. The first INWR area were taken. Recent marketing campaigns and the conference was held in Winnipeg, Canada, on community- development of new products appear to have stimulated the based whaling in the northern regions, followed by others in demand for whale meat. Washington DC, Lake Tahoe (Nevada), Quebec City, Halifax (Canada), Bodø (Norway), and Berkeley (California). The Norway uses a model developed by the International Whaling INWR newsletter (INWR Digest No. 1) began publication in Commission (IWC) to calculate the annual minke quota. At October 1992, and continues to be mailed to individual present, Norwegian and international scientists are working to subscribers and libraries; it is also accessible on the INWR improve the model after preliminary analyses indicate that the website.
    [Show full text]