DOCSLIB.ORG

Waterloo OSD Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waterloo OSD Environmental Impact Statement WATERLOO OVER STATION DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT i Sydney Metro | Pitt Street North Over Station Development EIS ii Sydney Metro | Pitt Street North Over Station Development EIS Sydney Metro City & Southwest: Waterloo Over Station Development Environmental Impact Statement Applicable to: Sydney Metro City & Southwest Author: Ethos Urban Owner Sydney Metro Status: FINAL Version: 02 Date of issue: 14 November 2018 Review date: 14 November 2018 © Sydney Metro 2018 Table of Contents Glossary and Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 14 Statement of Validity ........................................................................................................................... 16 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 18 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 18 Waterloo Integrated Station Development ............................................................................. 18 Sydney Metro City & Southwest planning approval .............................................................. 20 Waterloo Metro Quarter State Significant Precinct ................................................................ 21 Planning relationship between Waterloo Station and Metro Quarter OSD ........................... 22 Planning context .................................................................................................................... 22 Project aims ........................................................................................................................... 23 Project needs and benefits .................................................................................................... 24 The concept proposal ............................................................................................................ 25 Assessment of impacts and mitigation measures ................................................................. 27 Framework for the management of design and environmental impacts ............................... 33 Community consultation ........................................................................................................ 34 Conclusion and justification ................................................................................................... 35 Next steps .............................................................................................................................. 35 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 37 1.1. Purpose of this Statement ...................................................................................... 37 1.2. Sydney Metro City & Southwest – Chatswood to Sydenham ................................ 38 1.2.1. Overview ................................................................................................................ 38 1.2.2. Integrated Station Development ............................................................................. 40 1.2.3. Planning relationship between Waterloo Station and Metro Quarter OSD ............ 42 1.2.4. Planning relationship between Metro Quarter OSD and the Waterloo Metro Quarter State Significant Precinct .......................................................................... 45 1.3. Overview of proposed Metro Quarter OSD ............................................................ 46 1.4. Need for the project ................................................................................................ 47 1.5. Objectives of the development ............................................................................... 48 1.6. Analysis of alternatives ........................................................................................... 49 1.6.1. Alternative option – do nothing ............................................................................... 49 1.6.2. Alternative option – alternative building envelope designs .................................... 49 1.6.3. Preferred option ...................................................................................................... 62 2.0 Planning context .................................................................................................................. 63 2.1. State significant precinct ........................................................................................ 63 2.1.1. Relationship between the Metro Quarter OSD and Waterloo Estate SSP ............ 64 2.2. State significant development ................................................................................ 67 2.3. Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements ......................................... 68 2.4. Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 requirements for the EIS .......................................................................................................................... 79 2.5. Other Approvals ..................................................................................................... 81 3.0 The site ................................................................................................................................. 82 Page 2 of 342 Sydney Metro City & Southwest | Waterloo Over Station Development Environmental Impact Statement 3.1. Location .................................................................................................................. 82 3.2. Legal Description of the site ................................................................................... 85 3.3. Development on the site pre-demolition ................................................................. 85 3.4. Surrounding development ...................................................................................... 88 3.4.1. To the north ............................................................................................................ 88 3.4.2. To the east ............................................................................................................. 89 3.4.3. To the south ........................................................................................................... 89 3.4.4. To the west ............................................................................................................. 89 3.4.5. New and forthcoming development near the site ................................................... 89 3.5. Transport and accessibility ..................................................................................... 90 3.6. Open Space ........................................................................................................... 96 3.7. Heritage .................................................................................................................. 99 3.8. Topography / finished levels ................................................................................ 100 3.9. Flooding and stormwater ...................................................................................... 100 3.10. Community services, arts and culture .................................................................. 101 3.11. Utilities and infrastructure ..................................................................................... 103 3.12. Easements and covenants ................................................................................... 103 4.0 The development ............................................................................................................... 104 4.1. Description of the proposal .................................................................................. 104 4.2. Key development information ............................................................................... 106 4.3. Design influences ................................................................................................. 107 4.4. Building envelope ................................................................................................. 115 4.4.1. Podium ................................................................................................................. 116 4.4.2. Mid-rise buildings ................................................................................................. 119 4.4.3. Taller buildings ..................................................................................................... 119 4.5. Land use ............................................................................................................... 120 4.5.1. Non-residential podium ........................................................................................ 120 4.5.2. Residential mid-rise and taller buildings ............................................................... 124 4.6. Gross Floor Area .................................................................................................. 124 4.7. Pedestrian access and connectivity ..................................................................... 126 4.8. Vehicular access and parking .............................................................................. 130 4.9. Design guidelines and design excellence strategy .............................................. 132 4.9.1. Design guidelines ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Sydney Water
    The history of Sydney Water Since the earliest days of European settlement, providing adequate water and sewerage services for Sydney’s population has been a constant challenge. Sydney Water and its predecessor, the Metropolitan Water Sewerage and Drainage Board, has had a rich and colourful history. This history reflects the development and growth of Sydney itself. Over the past 200 years, Sydney’s unreliable rainfall has led to the development of one of the largest per capita water supplies in the world. A truly reliable water supply was not achieved until the early 1960s after constructing Warragamba Dam. By the end of the 20th Century, despite more efficient water use, Sydney once again faced the prospect of a water shortage due to population growth and unreliable rainfall patterns. In response to this, the NSW Government, including Sydney Water, started an ambitious program to secure Sydney’s water supplies. A mix of options has been being used including water from our dams, desalination, wastewater recycling and water efficiency. Timeline 1700s 1788 – 1826 Sydney was chosen as the location for the first European settlement in Australia, in part due to its outstanding harbour and the availability of fresh water from the Tank Stream. The Tank Stream remained Sydney’s main water source for 40 years. However, pollution rapidly became a problem. A painting by J. Skinner Prout of the Tank Stream in the 1840s 1800s 1880 Legislation was passed under Sir Henry Parkes, as Premier, which constitutes the Board of Water Supply and Sewerage. 1826 The Tank Stream was abandoned as a water supply because of pollution from rubbish, sewage and runoff from local businesses like piggeries.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandra Canal Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan
    Floodplain Risk Management Study City of Sydney Alexandra Canal Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan Alexandra Canal Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan APPENDIX A COMMUNITY BROCHURE, SURVEY AND PHOTOGRAPHS 20 May 2014 Cardno Page E1 W:\_Current Projects\4948 AlexandraCanal FRMSP\Report\R001-W4948-Alex Canal FPRMSv6.docx Alexandra Canal Catchment Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan March 2013 The City of Sydney is preparing a Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan for the Alexandra Canal Catchment area and we would like your help. The study will tell us about the type of flood mitigation solutions feasible for the catchment and help us plan for and manage any flood risks. Good management of flood risks can help reduce damage and improve social and economic opportunities. To access the questionnaire online visit cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au The City of Sydney has engaged Study area and flooding issues Floodplain risk Cardno to assist with the preparation The Alexandra Canal catchment includes management options of the Alexandra Canal Floodplain Risk the suburbs of Alexandria, Rosebery, The following list of floodplain risk Management Study and Plan. Erskineville, Beaconsfield, Zetland, management options are examples The Alexandra Canal Flood Study was Waterloo, Redfern, Newtown, Eveleigh, of the type of strategies that could be completed by Cardno in 2011, giving the Surry Hills and Moore Park. considered to minimise risk and reduce City of Sydney a better understanding of The majority of the catchment includes the impact of flooding in the catchment. the nature of flooding in your area. The residential, commercial and industrial land These options will be investigated in next step in the NSW Government Flood uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Inventory Sheet
    Heritage Inventory Sheet Item Name Parramatta Road Milestone Recommended Name Parramatta Road Milestones Group Site Image Address Parramatta Road, between Dartbrook Road and Station Street, Auburn NSW 2144; and Parramatta Road, between Platform Street and Delhi Street, Lidcombe NSW 2144. Lot/Section/DP - - - Draft Cumberland LEP ID I295 Former LEP ID A51 (Auburn LEP) Parramatta Road Milestone; and A52 (Auburn LEP) Parramatta Road Milestone. Heritage Conservation Not included Area Date Updated March 2020 Significance Level LOCAL Site Type Level 1 Built Level 2 Exploration, Survey and Events Heritage Study 2019 – Extent Heritage Pty Ltd Curtilage Map Note: Former item number used to identify individual milestones. Revised curtilage recommended – refer below Heritage Study 2019 – Extent Heritage Pty Ltd Statement of Significance The Parramatta Road Milestones Group are of local significance for their historic, associative, aesthetic and representative heritage values. The milestones are historically significant in their role of marking the distance of the journey along Parramatta Road from Parramatta to Sydney. They are a tangible reminder of the continuing importance of Parramatta Road as a main highway between Sydney, Parramatta and the West. While some milestones are no longer located in their exact original location, they relate to their original location and mark the significance of Parramatta Road and the construction of roads by the Department of Main Roads. The milestones are associated with the Department of Main Roads in 1934 and their implementation of the "Type D" milestones for use in urban situations. The milestones have aesthetic significance through their notable lettering and form, and their role as a landscape element.
    [Show full text]
  • AGL Leafs Gully Power Project Environmental Assessment MP 08 0077
    VOLUME 3 APPENDICES FEBRUARY 2009 AGL Leafs Gully Power Project Environmental Assessment MP 08_0077 Appendix N Historic Heritage Assessment Gas Turbine Power Station Leafs Gully, NSW Historical Heritage Assessment: Desktop Review May 2007 Navin Officer heritage consultants Pty Ltd acn: 092 901 605 Number 4 Kingston Warehouse 71 Leichhardt St. Kingston ACT 2604 ph 02 6282 9415 A Report to URS Australia Pty Ltd fx 02 6282 9416 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGL is currently developing a gas turbine peaking project in Leafs Gully, southwest Sydney, NSW. The location of the development is approximately five kilometres from the southern urban fringe of the Campbelltown local government area, six kilometres northwest of Appin village, between about two and three kilometres west of Appin Road, and between 600 m and two kilometres east of the Nepean River. This report provides a desktop review of historical heritage places in the vicinity of the proposed gas turbine power station, and the station’s impact on the heritage significance of those places. Those places include, ‘Meadowvale’ and ‘Mount Gilead’ homesteads, and the Sydney Water Supply Upper Canal system. Findings The study found that: ‘Meadow Vale’: Is classified as an historic site by the National Trust of Australia (NSW); Fulfils NSW Heritage Office significance criteria a (historical), b (personal association), e (research) and g (characteristics) and has moderate heritage significance for heritage listing at a local level; The distant landscape context of Meadow Vale and has little heritage
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Moore Park, Sydney
    The history of Moore Park, Sydney John W. Ross Cover photographs: Clockwise from top: Sunday cricket and Rotunda Moore Park Zoological Gardens (image from Sydney Living Museums) Kippax Lake Sydney Morning Herald, 30 August, 1869 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Timeline................................................................................................................................................... 3 Sydney Common ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Busby’s Bore ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Moore Park General Cemetery ............................................................................................................. 11 Victoria Barracks ................................................................................................................................... 13 Randwick and Moore Park Toll Houses ................................................................................................ 17 Paddington Rifle Range ......................................................................................................................... 21 Sydney Cricket Ground ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ryde Water Pumping Station
    1 NOMINATION FOR ENGINEERING HERITAGE RECOGNITION Ryde Water Pumping Station RYDE WATER PUMPING STATION | 2016 2 Ryde Water Pumping Station is a landmark within the Ryde area of Sydney and is valued for its technical, historical and aesthetic cultural heritage significance. The site of the Ryde Water Pumping Station was chosen to deliver water to the city’s northern suburbs. These suburbs may be defined as being north of Sydney Harbour and north of Parramatta River. The Ryde Water Pumping Station is of high operational importance in Sydney’s water supply system. Illustrating Pumping Station No. 2 (2008) This proposal for Ryde Water Pumping Station to be recognised for its heritage significance has been prepared by Phil Bennett and Simon Wiltshier on behalf of the Engineering Heritage Committee (Sydney). RYDE WATER PUMPING STATION | 2016 3 CONTENTS Introduction …………………………………….……………………………….…..……5 Heritage Award Nomination Form………………………………….…….….…….…..7 Heritage Assessment…………………………………………………..………..….……9 Assessment of Significance 10 Sources 14 Historical Overview……………………………………………………………………..15 Ryde Water Pumping Station No. 1 19 Ryde Water pumping Station No. 2 33 Machinery and Operation 58 Depression and Relief Works 68 WW11 69 Bibliography…………………………………………….……………..…………………75 Interpretation Plan…………………………………………………….…… ………….77 Assessment of Category of Award…………………………………………………...79 APPENDIX 1 …….. (letter of support from owner) APPENDIX 2 …….. (chronological history – Doring Report) APPENDIX 3 ……… (Ryde Pumping Station, Sydney Water Journal 1959) APPENDIX 4 …….. (Heritage listing – NSW Heritage Council) RYDE WATER PUMPING STATION | 2016 4 RYDE WATER PUMPING STATION | 2016 5 INTRODUCTION Reference to the Ryde Water Pumping Station generally means the whole site but where relevant the two pumping stations are referred to as Pumping Station No.1 and Pumping Station No.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage and Conservation Register 2006-07
    1 Heritage and Conservation Register 2006-07 State Conservation Condition Comments Heritage Management Item name Register Plan (CMP) Good Fair Poor listed? prepared? Alexandra Canal Y Y No major works undertaken this financial year Allawah Reservoir (WS 0001) No major works undertaken this financial year Ashfield Reservoir (elevated) (WS 0003) Y Y No major works undertaken this financial year Balmain Reservoir (covered) (WS 0006) No major works undertaken this financial year Balmain Reservoir Valve House No major works undertaken this financial year Bankstown Reservoir (elevated) (WS 0007) Y Y No major works undertaken this financial year Bantry Bay Reservoir (WS 0008) No major works undertaken this financial year Bantry Bay Water Pumping Station (WPS 122) No major works undertaken this financial year Beattie Street Stormwater Channel No.15 No major works undertaken this financial year Beecroft Reservoir (WS 0009) No major works undertaken this financial year Bennelong Stormwater Channel No. 29 No major works undertaken this financial year Berkeley Reservoir (WS 0011) No major works undertaken this financial year Berkeley Reservoir (WS 0012) No major works undertaken this financial year Berowra Reservoir (elevated) (WS 0013) No major works undertaken this financial year Birds Gully Stormwater Channel No.10 No major works undertaken this financial year Blackwattle Bay Stormwater Channel No.17 No major works undertaken this financial year 2 Heritage and Conservation Register 2006-07 State Conservation Condition Comments
    [Show full text]
  • Potts Hill Potts Hill Reservoirs
    POTTS HILL RESERVOIRS SITE ––– WESTERN PRECINCT HERITAGE INTERPRETATION STRATEGYS T R A T E G Y prepared for SYDNEY WATER by TANNER ARCHITECTS PTY LTD PO Box 660 Darlinghurst 1300 52 Albion Street Surry Hills 2010 Tel: 02 9281 4399 Fax: 02 9281 4337 TA Job No. 09 081 FINAL ISSUE – NOVEMBER 2009 POTTS HILL RESERVOIRS SITE ––– WESTERN PRECINCT HERITAGE INTERPRETATION STRATEGY CONTENTS 111 INTRODUCTION 111 1.11.11.1 GENERAL 111 1.21.21.2 STRUCTURE OF REPORT 111 1.31.31.3 PURPOSE OF THE HERITAGE INTERPRETATION STRATEGY 111 1.41.41.4 SCOPE OF THE HERITAGE INTERPRETATION STRATEGY 222 1.51.51.5 DEFINITIONS 333 1.61.61.6 AUTHORSHIP 333 222 HISTORY AND DESCRIPTDESCRIPTIONION OF THE SITE 444 333 SUMMARY OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE 555 3.13.13.1 STATEMENT OF CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE 555 3.23.23.2 RELATIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF WESTERN PRECINCT 666 3.33.33.3 HERHERITAGEITAGE LISTINGS 666 444 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPDEVELOPMENTMENT 777 4.14.14.1 HERITAGE DESIGN PARAMETERS 161616 555 APPROACH TO THE HERIHERITAGETAGE INTERPRETATION STRATEGY 101010 5.5.5.15. 111 CONSERVATION POLICIES 101010 5.25.25.2 PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH 111111 5.35.35.3 INTERPRETATION RESOURCES 111111 5.45.45.4 INTERPRETATION THEMES 111111 5.55.55.5 INTERPRETATION OBJECTIVES 121212 5.65.65.6 AUDIENCE PROFILE 121212 666 HERITAGE INTERPRETATINTERPRETATIONION STRATEGY 131313 6.16.16.1 OPTIONS FOR INTERPRETIVE MEDIA 131313 6.26.26.2 IMPLEMENTATION 141414 Issue Date Purpose Written Approved P1 November 2009 Issue for Project Team Review VH CMJ A November 2009 Final Issues for Submission VH CMJ TANNER ARCHITECTS ISSUE P1 – NOVEMBER 2009 S:\_Projects\Landcom\091081 Potts Hill Western Precinct\Interpretation\Interpretation Final 091117.doc POTTS HILL RESERVOIRS SITE ––– WESTERN PRECINCT HERITAGE INTERPRETATION STRATEGY 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL This Heritage Interpretation Strategy for the Western (residential) Precinct of the Potts Hill Reservoirs Site was commissioned by Landcom to form part of the Part 3A Project Application for the redevelopment of the Potts Hill Western (residential) Precinct Surplus Lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Historic Cultural Heritage Assessment 20.09.12
    BIOSIS R E S E A R C H Camden Gas Project Amended Northern Expansion: Historic Cultural Heritage Assessment Report for AGL Upstream Investments Pty. Ltd. October 2012 Natural & Cultural Heritage Consultants 8 Tate Street Wollongong 2500 BIOSIS R E S E A R C H Ballarat: 506 Macarthur Street Ballarat, VIC, 3350 Ph: (03) 5331 7000 Fax: (03) 5331 7033 email: [email protected] Brisbane: 72A Wickham Street, Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006 Ph: (07) 3831 7400 Fax: (07) 3831 7411 email: [email protected] Canberra: Unit 16 / 2 Yallourn Street, Fyshwick, ACT, 2609 Ph: (02) 6228 1599 Fax: (02) 6280 8752 email: [email protected] Melbourne: 38 Bertie Street, Port Melbourne, VIC, 3207 Ph: (03) 9646 9499 Fax: (03) 9646 9242 email: [email protected] Sydney: 18-20 Mandible Street, Alexandria, NSW, 2015 Ballarat: Ph: (02) 9690 2777 Fax: (02) 9690 2577 email: [email protected] 449 Doveton Street North Ballarat3350 Wangaratta: 26a Reid Street, Wangaratta, VIC, 3677 Ph: (03) 5331 7000 Fax: (03) 5331 7033 Ph: (03) 5721 9453 Fax: (03) 5721 9454 Email: [email protected] Queanbeyan: Wollongong: 8 Tate Street Wollongong, NSW, 2500 Ph: (02) 4229 5222 Fax: (02) 4229 5500 55 Lorn Road Queanbeyan 2620 email: [email protected] Ph: (02) 6284 4633 Fax: (02) 6284 4699 Project no: s5252 / 11944/13343/14975 BIOSIS RESEARCH Pty. Ltd. A.C.N. 006 075 197 Author: Fenella Atkinson Pamela Kottaras Asher Ford Reviewer: Melanie Thomson Peter Woodley Mapping: Robert Suansri Ashleigh Pritchard Biosis Research Pty. Ltd. This document is and shall remain the property of Biosis Research Pty.
    [Show full text]
  • Yan Yean Water Supply System Conservation Management Plan Volume 2: History
    Yan Yean Water Supply System Conservation Management Plan Volume 2: History Final May 2007 Prepared for Melbourne Water © Context Pty Ltd 2007 All rights reserved; these materials are copyright. No part may be reproduced or copied in any way, form or by any means without permission. Project Team: Lesley Alves – Historian Context Pty Ltd - David Helms, Natica Schmeder, Chris Johnston, Jackie Donkin & Fae Ingledew Godden Mackay Logan – Tony Brassil Dr Helen Doyle - Historian Context Pty Ltd 22 Merri Street, Brunswick 3056 Phone 03 9380 6933 Facsimile 03 9380 4066 Email [email protected] ii CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS V PREFACE VI 1 PROVIDING A WATER SUPPLY FOR MELBOURNE 7 1.1 Introduction 7 1.2 Melbourne’s early water supply 7 1.3 Development of Melbourne’s infrastructure 8 1.4 James Blackburn 9 1.5 Development of the Yan Yean water supply system 9 1.5.1 History of the site 9 1.5.2 Blackburn’s water supply scheme 11 1.5.3 Construction of the Yan Yean Reservoir and associated system 13 1.5.4 Improving supply –fixing problems with the system 14 1.5.5 Increasing supply - additions to the system 18 1.6 Role in Melbourne’s development 21 1.7 Developing other water supply systems 22 1.7.1 Maroondah and O’Shannassy Systems 22 1.7.2 Upper Yarra, Thomson, Sugarloaf and other storages 23 2 MANAGING THE WATER SUPPLY 25 2.1 Introduction 25 2.2 Governance 25 2.3 Maintenance 25 3 ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENTS 29 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 The reservoirs 29 3.2.1 Yan Yean Reservoir 29 3.2.2 Service Reservoirs 31 3.2.3 Toorourrong Reservoir 31 3.3 Pipes, mains and aqueducts 32 3.4 Other Australian urban water supply systems 33 3.4.1 Launceston and Hobart 33 3.4.2 Bendigo 33 3.4.3 Brisbane 34 3.4.4 Adelaide 34 3.4.5 Sydney 35 4 THE PRESTON RESERVOIRS 37 4.1 Introduction 37 4.2 Preston Reservoir No.
    [Show full text]
  • S60666 V3 Cover.Cdr
    Camden Gas Project, Northern Expansion: Part 3A Historic Cultural Heritage Assessment, NSW 2010 FINAL FIGURES BIOSIS RESEARCH 98 MountMount WilsonWilsonBilpinBilpin TaranaTarana MountMount WilsonWilsonBilpinBilpin WoyWoy WoyWoy HartleyHartley MountMount VictoriaVictoria WindsorRichmondWindsorRichmond WindsorWindsor BerowraBerowra HamptonHampton BlackheathBlackheath OberonOberon KatoombaKatoomba MonaMona ValeVale HornsbyHornsby PenrithPenrith BlacktownBlacktown BlacktownBlacktown EppingEpping ChatswoodChatswoodManlyManly BlackBlack SpringsSprings JenolanJenolan CavesCaves ParramattaParramatta MulgoaMulgoa WallaciaWallacia StrathfieldStrathfield SydneySydney BankstownBankstownLiverpoolLiverpool SydneySydney HurstvilleHurstville .. SutherlandSutherland NarellenNarellen CamdenCamden CampbelltownCampbelltown MenangleMenangle PictonPicton AppinAppin BuxtonBuxton BargoBargo BellambiBellambi PointPoint Bioregions (IBRA ver. 6.1) TaralgaTaralga Sydney Basin WollongongWollongong South Eastern Highlands MyrtlevilleMyrtleville MittagongMittagong BowralBowral PortPort KemblaKembla MossMoss ValeVale 00 1010 2020 3030 4040 kilometreskilometres (((( (((( (((( (((( LEPPINGTONLEPPINGTON (( (( (((( (((( (((( (((( (((( (((( MDENMDENMDEN VALLEY VALLEYVALLEY WAY WAYWAY MDENMDENMDEN VALLEY VALLEYVALLEY WAY WAYWAY (((( (((( (((( CACACA (((( CACACA (((( GEORGESGEORGESGEORGESGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER CACACA GEORGESGEORGESGEORGESGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVERGEORGES RIVER RIVER RIVER RIVER CACACA GEORGESGEORGESGEORGESGEORGES
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    1.0 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION The Sydney Airport 1.1 Sydney Airport location The airport is situated 8km south of Sydney’s central Environment Strategy 2013 business district (CBD) on a 907 hectare site owned – 2018 provides the strategic by the Australian Government and leased to Sydney Airport Corporation Limited (Sydney Airport), known as direction for the environmental the airport lessee company (ALC) under the Airports management of Sydney Airport Act 1996. The airport is strategically located on the northern shores of Botany Bay adjacent to Sydney’s for the five year period between main shipping container port – Port Botany. An aerial 2013 and 2018. This is the photograph of the airport is shown in Figure 1.1. Sydney Airport in relation to other airports and airfields fourth Environment Strategy in the Sydney region is shown in Figure 1.2. prepared by Sydney Airport. The boundaries of the City of Botany Bay, Marrickville and Rockdale City local government areas (LGAs) fall within the airport site. The airport comprises the aerodrome and a number of other smaller landholdings including: • Parcels of land on the northern side of Alexandra Canal, including the northern lands and the high intensity approach lighting (HIAL) site • The former Pacific Power and former Department of Public Works and Services sites in South Burrows Road, Alexandria 12 Sydney Airport Environment Strategy 2013–2018 • A small parcel of land on the western foreshore year Love leased 400 acres from the Kensington Racing of the Cooks River, located near the Kogarah Club for £300 a year. In January 1920, the site was Golf Course officially declared an aerodrome and today the airport is • The elevated water tank in Old Street, Tempe one of the oldest continuously operating airports in the world.
    [Show full text]