Yan Yean Water Supply System Conservation Management Plan Volume 2: History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yan Yean Water Supply System Conservation Management Plan Volume 2: History Yan Yean Water Supply System Conservation Management Plan Volume 2: History Final May 2007 Prepared for Melbourne Water © Context Pty Ltd 2007 All rights reserved; these materials are copyright. No part may be reproduced or copied in any way, form or by any means without permission. Project Team: Lesley Alves – Historian Context Pty Ltd - David Helms, Natica Schmeder, Chris Johnston, Jackie Donkin & Fae Ingledew Godden Mackay Logan – Tony Brassil Dr Helen Doyle - Historian Context Pty Ltd 22 Merri Street, Brunswick 3056 Phone 03 9380 6933 Facsimile 03 9380 4066 Email [email protected] ii CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS V PREFACE VI 1 PROVIDING A WATER SUPPLY FOR MELBOURNE 7 1.1 Introduction 7 1.2 Melbourne’s early water supply 7 1.3 Development of Melbourne’s infrastructure 8 1.4 James Blackburn 9 1.5 Development of the Yan Yean water supply system 9 1.5.1 History of the site 9 1.5.2 Blackburn’s water supply scheme 11 1.5.3 Construction of the Yan Yean Reservoir and associated system 13 1.5.4 Improving supply –fixing problems with the system 14 1.5.5 Increasing supply - additions to the system 18 1.6 Role in Melbourne’s development 21 1.7 Developing other water supply systems 22 1.7.1 Maroondah and O’Shannassy Systems 22 1.7.2 Upper Yarra, Thomson, Sugarloaf and other storages 23 2 MANAGING THE WATER SUPPLY 25 2.1 Introduction 25 2.2 Governance 25 2.3 Maintenance 25 3 ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENTS 29 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 The reservoirs 29 3.2.1 Yan Yean Reservoir 29 3.2.2 Service Reservoirs 31 3.2.3 Toorourrong Reservoir 31 3.3 Pipes, mains and aqueducts 32 3.4 Other Australian urban water supply systems 33 3.4.1 Launceston and Hobart 33 3.4.2 Bendigo 33 3.4.3 Brisbane 34 3.4.4 Adelaide 34 3.4.5 Sydney 35 4 THE PRESTON RESERVOIRS 37 4.1 Introduction 37 4.2 Preston Reservoir No. 1 37 4.3 Preston Reservoirs 2 & 3 39 iii 4.4 Use of the Preston reservoirs and later developments 43 5 DEVELOPMENT OF CULTURAL LANDSCAPES 45 5.1 Introduction 45 5.2 Early vistas 45 5.3 Protecting and beautifying the reservoir 47 5.4 The Caretakers’ gardens 53 5.4.1 Yan Yean 53 5.4.2 Wallaby Creek 54 5.4.3 Preston and Toorourrong 54 5.5 Reference Areas 55 5.6 Protection of the Plenty Ranges watershed 55 5.7 Aqueduct plantings 56 5.8 Beautification of St Georges Road pipe track 58 6 RECREATION AND COMMEMORATION 59 6.1 Introduction 59 6.2 Tourism & recreation 59 6.3 Celebrations and commemorations 61 BIBLIOGRAPHY 63 Primary sources 63 Archives - Public Record Office Victoria 63 Published 63 Newspapers and Articles 63 Secondary sources 63 Published 63 Unpublished 65 Pictures 66 Websites 66 Oral source 66 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Our thanks are also extended to the following individuals whose assistance and advice was invaluable in the preparation of this history: • Ross Mugavin of Parks Victoria • Paul Balassone and all the staff at Melbourne Water who provided historic information, plans and oral history. • Doug Kerr v VOLUME 2: HISTORY PREFACE This is Volume 2 of the Conservation Management Plan for the Yan Yean water supply system. The Yan Yean system CMP comprises six volumes as follows: Volume 1: Executive Summary Volume 1 provides a summary of the study methodology and the key findings and recommendations. Volume 2: History Volume 2 provides an explanation of the historic development of the Yan Yean system within the context of the historic development of Melbourne and its water supply. It takes a thematic approach, drawing on the key themes set out in existing histories of the Yan Yean system such as Yan Yean. A history of Melbourne’s early water supply and Vital Connections. Melbourne and its Board of Works 1891-1991, and also looks beyond Victoria to the development of water supply systems in other parts of Australia during the nineteenth century. Volume 3: Heritage assessment Volume 3 provides an assessment of the cultural significance of heritage places associated with the Yan Yean system, and concludes with a statement of significance for the whole of the Yan Yean system. Volume 4: Conservation policy The history in Volume 2 and heritage assessment in Volume 3 provides the basis for the conservation policies and management strategies in Volume 4, which includes recommendations to manage the heritage values of the Yan Yean system and implement the CMP. Volume 5: Heritage place and Volume 5 contains place records for all of the heritage places precinct citations associated with the Yan Yean system, which a detailed history, physical description, photographs and statement of significance. The place records are derived from the Melbourne Water Yan Yean system HERMES database. Volume 6: Appendices Volume 6 contains the following reports that provide background or additional information: Yan Yean water supply system CMP & interpretation plan project management plan (March 2006) Context Pty Ltd Indigenous cultural heritage values of the Yan Yean system. Draft report for Context Pty Ltd (November 2005) Heritage Insight Yan Yean water supply system: A review of natural heritage values (December 2005) Ecology Australia Interpretation Plan M57 water main replacement project (2006) Context Pty Ltd. vi YAN YEAN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM CMP 1 PROVIDING A WATER SUPPLY FOR MELBOURNE 1.1 Introduction Early Melburnians drew their water supplies from the Yarra River, but problems of pollution and the high cost of delivery soon prompted a search for a better supply. During the 1850s, as James Blackburn’s scheme to bring water from the mountain ranges north of Melbourne was taking shape, other services and institutions essential to the growing city were also being developed. “The Yan Yean” as Melbourne’s water came to be known, was a key resource in Melbourne’s transformation from a small frontier town to a sophisticated modern city with a special pride in its gardens. The innovative Yan Yean water supply system was not without its problems, however, and remedies to improve water quality and quantity reflected scientific theories of the era. One of the main actions taken to improve water quality was to close the catchment to all other uses. During the latter decades of the nineteenth century the Yan Yean system was improved and expanded to its limits. The Wallaby Creek weirs and aqueduct were built to divert water from north flowing creeks, bringing extra water via the Toorourrong Reservoir and Clearwater Channel. The delivery system from Yan Yean was greatly expanded by increasing the pipelines and building service reservoirs. Other water supply systems were also developed, mostly during the twentieth century, integrating the Yan Yean system into a greatly enlarged urban scheme. This is the story of the Yan Yean water supply system and its place in Melbourne’s growth and development from first European settlement to the present. Subsequent chapters will expand on various aspects of the system. 1.2 Melbourne’s early water supply Crucial to the choice of the site for Melbourne in 1834 were the availability of fresh water and access for shipping. Batman’s village began to take shape on the banks of the Yarra River where a rocky barrier near present day Queen Street separated salt water from fresh. The Yarra River was Melbourne’s first water supply, with a distribution system consisting of horse-drawn tanks delivering to households, at high expense to the consumer. The Yarra was also Melbourne’s drain. Within a few years the river was so polluted by wastes created by the settlers and their industries, that its water posed a threat to public health. Melbourne Town Council, formed in 1842, sought suggestions for a clean piped water supply for the town. Of the schemes put forward, the best was that of Melbourne’s Town Clerk, J.C. King, who proposed pumping Yarra water into a reservoir on high ground near Dight’s Falls. However, although Council saw the provision of a water supply as its right and responsibility, it lacked the funds to implement such a scheme. A decade of investigations and deliberations ensued before a decision could be made regarding a suitable water supply system for Melbourne.1 Meanwhile, in 1849, a slight improvement in quality and price was achieved when the Melbourne Water Company commenced pumping water from the Yarra. The 1 Dingle, Tony and Doyle, Helen, Yan Yean, A history of Melbourne’s early water supply, North Melbourne, 2003, pp 3-6. 7 VOLUME 2: HISTORY water was filtered through charcoal and stored in iron tanks on the corner of Elizabeth and Flinders streets. From there it was distributed by water carters.2 The Melbourne Water Company was owned by James Blackburn, who was to become a key player in the story of the Yan Yean water supply system. Following Separation from New South Wales in 1851 the new Victorian Legislative Council, instead of providing the hoped-for funds to the Melbourne Council, appointed a Commission of Sewers and Water Supply, thus taking the matter out of municipal control. In 1854 the Commissioners built a large elevated tank on Eastern Hill with the intention of providing a reticulated supply of water pumped from the Yarra. They had already begun laying pipes in the city, in anticipation of the Yan Yean system, then in course of construction, but the tank was inadequate for the purpose.3 1.3 Development of Melbourne’s infrastructure By this time Melbourne had grown into a sizeable town, serving as a port and commercial centre for the pastoral industry that had spread across the western and central regions of the Port Phillip District.
Recommended publications
  • Regional Bird Monitoring Annual Report 2018-2019
    BirdLife Australia BirdLife Australia (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union) was founded in 1901 and works to conserve native birds and biological diversity in Australasia and Antarctica, through the study and management of birds and their habitats, and the education and involvement of the community. BirdLife Australia produces a range of publications, including Emu, a quarterly scientific journal; Wingspan, a quarterly magazine for all members; Conservation Statements; BirdLife Australia Monographs; the BirdLife Australia Report series; and the Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. It also maintains a comprehensive ornithological library and several scientific databases covering bird distribution and biology. Membership of BirdLife Australia is open to anyone interested in birds and their habitats, and concerned about the future of our avifauna. For further information about membership, subscriptions and database access, contact BirdLife Australia 60 Leicester Street, Suite 2-05 Carlton VIC 3053 Australia Tel: (Australia): (03) 9347 0757 Fax: (03) 9347 9323 (Overseas): +613 9347 0757 Fax: +613 9347 9323 E-mail: [email protected] Recommended citation: BirdLife Australia (2020). Melbourne Water Regional Bird Monitoring Project. Annual Report 2018-19. Unpublished report prepared by D.G. Quin, B. Clarke-Wood, C. Purnell, A. Silcocks and K. Herman for Melbourne Water by (BirdLife Australia, Carlton) This report was prepared by BirdLife Australia under contract to Melbourne Water. Disclaimers This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been undertaken to ensure that the information presented within is accurate. BirdLife Australia does not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Sydney Water
    The history of Sydney Water Since the earliest days of European settlement, providing adequate water and sewerage services for Sydney’s population has been a constant challenge. Sydney Water and its predecessor, the Metropolitan Water Sewerage and Drainage Board, has had a rich and colourful history. This history reflects the development and growth of Sydney itself. Over the past 200 years, Sydney’s unreliable rainfall has led to the development of one of the largest per capita water supplies in the world. A truly reliable water supply was not achieved until the early 1960s after constructing Warragamba Dam. By the end of the 20th Century, despite more efficient water use, Sydney once again faced the prospect of a water shortage due to population growth and unreliable rainfall patterns. In response to this, the NSW Government, including Sydney Water, started an ambitious program to secure Sydney’s water supplies. A mix of options has been being used including water from our dams, desalination, wastewater recycling and water efficiency. Timeline 1700s 1788 – 1826 Sydney was chosen as the location for the first European settlement in Australia, in part due to its outstanding harbour and the availability of fresh water from the Tank Stream. The Tank Stream remained Sydney’s main water source for 40 years. However, pollution rapidly became a problem. A painting by J. Skinner Prout of the Tank Stream in the 1840s 1800s 1880 Legislation was passed under Sir Henry Parkes, as Premier, which constitutes the Board of Water Supply and Sewerage. 1826 The Tank Stream was abandoned as a water supply because of pollution from rubbish, sewage and runoff from local businesses like piggeries.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandra Canal Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan
    Floodplain Risk Management Study City of Sydney Alexandra Canal Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan Alexandra Canal Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan APPENDIX A COMMUNITY BROCHURE, SURVEY AND PHOTOGRAPHS 20 May 2014 Cardno Page E1 W:\_Current Projects\4948 AlexandraCanal FRMSP\Report\R001-W4948-Alex Canal FPRMSv6.docx Alexandra Canal Catchment Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan March 2013 The City of Sydney is preparing a Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan for the Alexandra Canal Catchment area and we would like your help. The study will tell us about the type of flood mitigation solutions feasible for the catchment and help us plan for and manage any flood risks. Good management of flood risks can help reduce damage and improve social and economic opportunities. To access the questionnaire online visit cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au The City of Sydney has engaged Study area and flooding issues Floodplain risk Cardno to assist with the preparation The Alexandra Canal catchment includes management options of the Alexandra Canal Floodplain Risk the suburbs of Alexandria, Rosebery, The following list of floodplain risk Management Study and Plan. Erskineville, Beaconsfield, Zetland, management options are examples The Alexandra Canal Flood Study was Waterloo, Redfern, Newtown, Eveleigh, of the type of strategies that could be completed by Cardno in 2011, giving the Surry Hills and Moore Park. considered to minimise risk and reduce City of Sydney a better understanding of The majority of the catchment includes the impact of flooding in the catchment. the nature of flooding in your area. The residential, commercial and industrial land These options will be investigated in next step in the NSW Government Flood uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Inventory Sheet
    Heritage Inventory Sheet Item Name Parramatta Road Milestone Recommended Name Parramatta Road Milestones Group Site Image Address Parramatta Road, between Dartbrook Road and Station Street, Auburn NSW 2144; and Parramatta Road, between Platform Street and Delhi Street, Lidcombe NSW 2144. Lot/Section/DP - - - Draft Cumberland LEP ID I295 Former LEP ID A51 (Auburn LEP) Parramatta Road Milestone; and A52 (Auburn LEP) Parramatta Road Milestone. Heritage Conservation Not included Area Date Updated March 2020 Significance Level LOCAL Site Type Level 1 Built Level 2 Exploration, Survey and Events Heritage Study 2019 – Extent Heritage Pty Ltd Curtilage Map Note: Former item number used to identify individual milestones. Revised curtilage recommended – refer below Heritage Study 2019 – Extent Heritage Pty Ltd Statement of Significance The Parramatta Road Milestones Group are of local significance for their historic, associative, aesthetic and representative heritage values. The milestones are historically significant in their role of marking the distance of the journey along Parramatta Road from Parramatta to Sydney. They are a tangible reminder of the continuing importance of Parramatta Road as a main highway between Sydney, Parramatta and the West. While some milestones are no longer located in their exact original location, they relate to their original location and mark the significance of Parramatta Road and the construction of roads by the Department of Main Roads. The milestones are associated with the Department of Main Roads in 1934 and their implementation of the "Type D" milestones for use in urban situations. The milestones have aesthetic significance through their notable lettering and form, and their role as a landscape element.
    [Show full text]
  • MW-Rbm-Annual Report-2016.Pdf
    BirdLife Australia BirdLife Australia (Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union) was founded in 1901 and works to conserve native birds and biological diversity in Australasia and Antarctica, through the study and management of birds and their habitats, and the education and involvement of the community. BirdLife Australia produces a range of publications, including Emu, a quarterly scientific journal; Wingspan, a quarterly magazine for all members; Conservation Statements; BirdLife Australia Monographs; the BirdLife Australia Report series; and the Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. It also maintains a comprehensive ornithological library and several scientific databases covering bird distribution and biology. Membership of BirdLife Australia is open to anyone interested in birds and their habitats, and concerned about the future of our avifauna. For further information about membership, subscriptions and database access, contact BirdLife Australia 60 Leicester Street, Suite 2-05 Carlton VIC 3053 Australia Tel: (Australia): (03) 9347 0757 Fax: (03) 9347 9323 (Overseas): +613 9347 0757 Fax: +613 9347 9323 E-mail: [email protected] Recommended citation: Herman, K and Purnell, C., 2016. Melbourne Water Regional Bird Monitoring Project. Annual report: July 2015 –June 2016. Unpublished report prepared for Melbourne Water by BirdLife Australia, Melbourne. This report was prepared by BirdLife Australia under contract to Melbourne Water. Disclaimers This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been undertaken to ensure that the information presented within is accurate. BirdLife Australia does not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • AGL Leafs Gully Power Project Environmental Assessment MP 08 0077
    VOLUME 3 APPENDICES FEBRUARY 2009 AGL Leafs Gully Power Project Environmental Assessment MP 08_0077 Appendix N Historic Heritage Assessment Gas Turbine Power Station Leafs Gully, NSW Historical Heritage Assessment: Desktop Review May 2007 Navin Officer heritage consultants Pty Ltd acn: 092 901 605 Number 4 Kingston Warehouse 71 Leichhardt St. Kingston ACT 2604 ph 02 6282 9415 A Report to URS Australia Pty Ltd fx 02 6282 9416 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGL is currently developing a gas turbine peaking project in Leafs Gully, southwest Sydney, NSW. The location of the development is approximately five kilometres from the southern urban fringe of the Campbelltown local government area, six kilometres northwest of Appin village, between about two and three kilometres west of Appin Road, and between 600 m and two kilometres east of the Nepean River. This report provides a desktop review of historical heritage places in the vicinity of the proposed gas turbine power station, and the station’s impact on the heritage significance of those places. Those places include, ‘Meadowvale’ and ‘Mount Gilead’ homesteads, and the Sydney Water Supply Upper Canal system. Findings The study found that: ‘Meadow Vale’: Is classified as an historic site by the National Trust of Australia (NSW); Fulfils NSW Heritage Office significance criteria a (historical), b (personal association), e (research) and g (characteristics) and has moderate heritage significance for heritage listing at a local level; The distant landscape context of Meadow Vale and has little heritage
    [Show full text]
  • Local Context and Site Description
    LOCAL CONTEXT AND SITE DESCRIPTION Metropolitan and Regional Context The Greenvale Central Precinct Structure Plan (PSP) area is located approximately 20 kilometres north of the Melbourne CBD, within the Hume Growth Area shown on Plan 1. Melbourne‟s Hume Growth Area generally extends north from Somerton Road (west of Sydney-Melbourne rail line) to Gunns Gully Road at Merrifield. It includes parts of the suburbs of Greenvale and Craigieburn and the localities of Donnybrook, Kalkallo and Beveridge. The Hume Growth Area, along with the Mitchell and Whittlesea Growth Areas, make up the Melbourne North Growth Corridor. The Melbourne North Growth Corridor Plan details the strategic direction for future urban development within this region. The corridor is characterised by strong population growth occurring on various fronts. The population base is projected to increase from its current level of around 170,000 residents to over 220,000 people and has the capacity to provide for at least 68,000 jobs. The North Growth Corridor Plan provides an opportunity to establish new communities to assist in meeting Melbourne‟s urban growth needs over the next 30 years. The plan ensures that the following existing key roles and features are maintained within the Hume Growth Area: A strategic transport corridor of state and national significance; A gateway to Melbourne for interstate and international visitors; Large areas for future employment and industrial development; Highly self-contained working population (with approximately 50% of Hume‟s workforce employed within the municipality); Significant water catchments, creek corridors, remnant vegetation and stone resources on its east and west boundaries; and Important landscape features and biodiversity assets including grasslands and grassy woodlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Preliminary Business Case Summary Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning
    Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Preliminary Business Case Summary Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer 2 Sugarloaf Pipeline South-North Transfer Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Introduction During the Millennium Pipeline to provide water security The key questions asked in the Drought, Victoria made to towns and communities in both preliminary business case were: large investments in the directions. The work has shown that it is technically feasible to • What infrastructure is required state’s water security. The pump water north with additional for bi-directional pumping and Victorian Desalination works to existing infrastructure. It is it technically feasible? Project was commissioned, would require additional capital • How much water can be investment and it is an option that $1 billion dollars was pumped from the Melbourne government will continue to invested in upgrading the system to the Goulburn River? explore. Goulburn-Murray Irrigation • When can water be transferred District, and the water grid The primary benefits available by and where can it be used? was expanded, including sending water north through the building the Sugarloaf Sugarloaf Pipeline include: • Is the infrastructure financially viable? Pipeline. • supplying water to irrigators and private diverters to improve This document summarises the As a consequence of these agricultural productivity; key findings of the preliminary investments, the Victorian business case. Government has determined that • improving water security for up to an additional 75 gigalitres rural towns and urban centres (GL) per year be available for use connected to the water grid; in northern Victoria. This will support industry and farmers, • making water available to be particularly during dry conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Water Annual Report 2012–13 Contents
    Enhancing Life and Liveability Melbourne Water Annual Report 2012–13 Contents Overview Page 1 Chairman’s Report Page 2 Managing Director’s Report Page 3 Service delivery Page 4 Water Page 6 Alternative water sources and integrated water cycle management Page 14 Sewerage Page 22 Waterways Page 28 Corporate Page 36 Environmental stewardship Page 38 Relationships Page 46 Financial sustainability Page 52 Organisational capability Page 62 Financial Report Page 68 Performance reporting Page 127 Statutory information Page 140 Overview About us Melbourne Water is owned by the Victorian Government. We manage water supply catchments, treat and supply drinking and recycled water, remove and treat most of Melbourne’s sewage, and manage waterways and major drainage systems in the Port Phillip and Westernport region. In all our business decisions we consider social, environmental and financial effects, and short-term and long-term implications. Our customers include metropolitan water retailers, other water authorities, land developers and businesses that divert river water, and the 1.8 million households that receive waterways and drainage services in the greater Melbourne region. We deliver our services in partnership with others including government agencies, local councils, catchment authorities, contractors and suppliers. About this report Accessibility Melbourne Water’s Annual Report An accessible text format of this report 2012–13 describes our annual progress is available on our website at towards achieving our vision of Enhancing melbournewater.com.au Life and Liveability in the greater Melbourne If you want to obtain a copy of this report, region, and how we met our regulatory or sections of it, in a different accessible obligations from 1 July 2012 to 30 June format, please contact Melbourne Water 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Annual Report
    Water Quality Annual Report 2016-17 Melbourne Water Doc ID. 39900111 Melbourne Water is owned by the Victorian Government. We manage Melbourne’s water supply catchments, remove and treat most of Melbourne’s sewage, and manage rivers and creeks and major drainage systems throughout the Port Phillip and Westernport region. Table of contents Water supply system .................................................................................................. 3 Source water .............................................................................................................. 4 Improvement initiatives ............................................................................................. 7 Drinking water treatment processes .......................................................................... 8 Issues ...................................................................................................................... 16 Emergency, incident and event management ........................................................... 16 Risk management plan audit results ........................................................................ 17 Exemptions under Section 8 of the Act ..................................................................... 17 Undertakings under Section 30 of the Act ................................................................ 17 Further information .................................................................................................. 17 2 Water Quality Annual Report | 2016-17 This report is
    [Show full text]
  • Better Water Resources Forecasts for Melbourne
    Better water resources CASE STUDY forecasts for Melbourne The Bureau of Meteorology’s seasonal streamflow forecasts provide Melbourne Water with improved information to aid water resource management for Melbourne. These forecasts indicate the likely volume of catchment inflows into the city’s major water supply reservoirs for the next three months. Collaboration between the two organisations has led Testing the forecast accuracy to the continued development of seasonal streamflow Together, the Bureau and Melbourne Water evaluated forecasts for Melbourne Water, offered insight for the the accuracy of monthly forecasts at five major inflow Bureau on how the forecasts can support decision- locations for Melbourne’s four major reservoirs— making within the water industry, and enabled better Maroondah, O’Shannassy, Upper Yarra and Thomson— communication on forecast performance. comparing the Bureau’s forecasting model output to the use of historical streamflow records (or climatology) Forecasting to improve Melbourne’s water for forecasting inflows for each location and season. resource management The Bureau’s model produced better forecasts than Severity of the 1997–2009 Millennium Drought— the information previously available. For each outlook, combined with projected impacts due to a changing the number of times the forecast matched what and variable climate, population growth and urban was observed (also called the ‘tercile hit rate’) was development—posed challenges to Melbourne’s water substantially higher using the Bureau’s model, than
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Annual Report
    Water Quality Annual Report 2018-19 Melbourne Water Doc ID. 51900842 Melbourne Water is owned by the Victorian Government. We manage Melbourne’s water supply catchments, remove and treat most of Melbourne’s sewage, and manage rivers and creeks and major drainage systems throughout the Port Phillip and Westernport region. Table of contents Water supply system .................................................................................................. 4 Source water .............................................................................................................. 4 Improvement initiatives ............................................................................................. 6 Drinking water treatment processes .......................................................................... 7 Issues ...................................................................................................................... 13 Emergency, incident and event management ........................................................... 13 Risk management plan audit results ........................................................................ 15 Exemptions under Section 8 of the Act ..................................................................... 15 Undertakings under Section 30 of the Act ................................................................ 15 Further information .................................................................................................. 15 Appendix .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]