DOCSLIB.ORG

The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 6006 Trans 10 fax: +31 30 253 6000 3512 JK Utrecht e-mail: [email protected] The Netherlands http://wwwlot.let.uu.nl/ Cover illustration: Cyril and Methodius, the first Slavic linguists. A picture by Barbara Tomaszewicz inspired by G. Čapkŭnov’s work. ISBN-10: 90-76864-99-3 ISBN-13: 978-90-76864-99-0 NUR 632 Copyright © 2006: Krzysztof Migdalski. All rights reserved. The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Tilburg, op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. F.A. van der Duyn Schouten, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van een door het college voor promoties aangewezen commissie in de aula van de universiteit op dinsdag 30 mei 2006 om 14.15 uur door Krzysztof Marek Migdalski geboren op 4 maart 1975 te Bielsko-Biała, Polen Promotor: Prof. dr. H.C. van Riemsdijk Copromotor: Dr. H.J.W.M Broekhuis Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................... XI ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................... XIII INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 THE DIACHRONY OF COMPOUND TENSES IN SLAVIC7 1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................7 1.2 The division of the Slavic languages ..........................................................7 1.2.1 The common ancestor........................................................................................8 1.2.2 Sources of the division........................................................................................9 1.3 The Tense and Aspect system ...................................................................11 1.3.1 The Tense System in Proto-Indo-European .................................................11 1.3.2 Modifications of tense and aspect systems in Proto-Slavic .........................13 1.3.3 Old Church Slavonic.........................................................................................16 1.3.3.1 Simple past tenses in Old Church Slavonic...............................................16 1.3.3.1.1 The aorist.................................................................................................16 1.3.3.1.2 The imperfectum ....................................................................................17 1.3.3.2 Aspect in Old Church Slavonic...................................................................18 1.3.3.3 Some interactions between tense and aspect ............................................20 1.3.3.3.1 Imperfectum + Perfective Aspect........................................................21 1.3.3.3.2 Aorist + Imperfective Aspect...............................................................22 1.3.3.4 The Compound Tenses in Old Church Slavonic .....................................22 1.3.3.4.1 Future tenses ...........................................................................................22 1.3.3.4.1.1 Future I.............................................................................................23 1.3.3.4.1.2 Future II (Futurum Exactum/Future Perfect)............................23 1.3.3.4.2 The pluperfect.........................................................................................24 1.3.3.4.3 Present Perfect........................................................................................25 1.3.3.4.3.1 The form of the Present Perfect...................................................25 1.3.3.4.3.2 The meaning of the present perfect .............................................26 1.3.3.4.4 The conditional mood............................................................................27 1.3.3.5 Participial forms in Old Church Slavonic..................................................28 1.3.3.5.1 The l-participle ........................................................................................30 1.3.3.5.1.1 The meaning of the l-participle.....................................................30 1.3.3.5.1.2 Development of the l-participle....................................................31 1.3.3.5.1.3 L-participles versus l-adjectives.....................................................32 1.3.3.5.1.4 Grammatical properties of the l-participle ..................................32 1.3.3.5.2 The auxiliary / copula ‘to be’................................................................33 1.3.3.5.2.1 Tense.................................................................................................33 1.3.3.5.2.2 Aspect...............................................................................................34 1.3.3.5.2.3 Auxiliary vs copula..........................................................................34 1.3.4 Development of the tenses in Modern Slavic languages..............................35 1.3.4.1 Simple past tenses.........................................................................................37 1.3.4.1.1 East and West Slavic ..............................................................................37 1.3.4.1.2 South Slavic .............................................................................................37 1.3.4.2 Present perfect...............................................................................................39 1.3.4.2.1 East Slavic................................................................................................39 1.3.4.2.2 West Slavic...............................................................................................40 1.3.4.2.2.1 Changes to the auxiliary in Polish.................................................40 1.3.4.2.2.2 Changes to the present perfect in Polish .....................................42 1.3.4.2.2.3 The auxiliary versus copula distinction in Czech........................45 1.3.4.2.3 A reanalysis of the present perfect in Serbo-Croatian.......................47 1.3.4.3 The pluperfect ...............................................................................................48 1.3.4.3.1 South Slavic .............................................................................................48 1.3.4.3.2 West and East Slavic ..............................................................................49 1.3.4.4 Ways of expressing the future.....................................................................49 1.3.4.4.1 South Slavic .............................................................................................50 1.3.4.4.2 West and East Slavic ..............................................................................52 1.3.4.4.2.1 Compound future tense forms......................................................52 1.3.4.4.2.2 Expressing the future with perfective verbs................................53 1.3.4.5 New types of compound tenses in Slavic..................................................54 1.3.4.5.1 The renarrated mood .............................................................................54 1.3.4.5.1.1 Bulgarian and Macedonian.............................................................54 1.3.4.5.1.2 Beyond Bulgarian and Macedonian..............................................55 1.3.4.5.2 ‘Have’-perfects........................................................................................56 1.3.4.5.2.1 Macedonian......................................................................................56 1.3.4.5.2.2 Beyond Macedonian .......................................................................58 1.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................... 59 CHAPTER 2 THE SYNTAX OF 'BE'-PERFECTS AND THE L- PARTICIPLE .................................................................................................... 61 2.1 Introduction............................................................................................... 61 2.2 Head-movement accounts of participle fronting in Bulgarian and Serbo- Croatian................................................................................................................. 62 2.2.1 Participle fronting as long head movement ...................................................63 2.2.2 Participle fronting as head adjunction ............................................................65 2.3 Towards an alternative analysis ................................................................ 67 2.3.1 Properties of the l-participle.............................................................................67 2.3.2 Participle fronting as locative inversion..........................................................68 2.3.3 Details of the present analysis..........................................................................71 2.3.3.1 Movement of adjuncts..................................................................................71 2.3.3.2 Movement of internal arguments................................................................72 2.3.3.2.1.1 Object shift requirement................................................................73 2.3.3.2.1.2 Direct object shift ...........................................................................73 2.3.3.2.1.3 Indirect object shift.........................................................................75 2.3.3.2.1.4 Movement of the indirect object PPs in Bulgarian ....................76 2.3.3.2.1.5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Examples of Past Perfect Tense in English
    Examples Of Past Perfect Tense In English Blasting and evincible Pepillo revered so unmistakably that Antonius clamber his intercolumniation. Disentangled and forespent Cletus deflating some riveters so well-timed! Is Curt troubling or lithographical when concretes some dolichocephaly vaporizing recessively? Present and martial art equipments each level, we care of them to perfect in Are past present tense? This tense is used to do you emma is understood me for free guide will be adapted for years before understanding of examples past tense in perfect english past tense refers to stand up? When expressing your third party or in tense sentence by the past simple is time doris got to! She cover a want, you know. The second issue may set to leave event that happened continuously or habitually in to past. She would sent dozens of applications when one day finally responded. Dictionary of English Grammar the authors give these examples. They have been completed in english and learn your name is to english fluently, i appreciate the english of past perfect tense examples to the tenses, you ready to! Past verb tense English grammar 12th November 201 by Andrew 1 Comment Let's start with sample example attach the past remains in context Yesterday Mark. In English the your perfect condition two parts often 'had' plus the signature simple. As well as well as long or song lyrics, especially books before him? Thank you ever seen once you think of having a week. In sentence of special topics, I have thus giving lessons in German pronunciation. Connor has offered to animal to her.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian: an Essential Grammar
    Contents Serbian An Essential Grammar Serbian: An Essential Grammar is an up to date and practical reference guide to the most important aspects of Serbian as used by contemporary native speakers of the language. This book presents an accessible description of the language, focusing on real, contemporary patterns of use. The Grammar aims to serve as a reference source for the learner and user of Serbian irrespective of level, by setting out the complexities of the language in short, readable sections. It is ideal for independent study or for students in schools, colleges, universities and all types of adult classes. Features of this Grammar include: • use of Cyrillic and Latin script in plentiful examples throughout • a cultural section on the language and its dialects • clear and detailed explanations of simple and complex grammatical concepts • detailed contents list and index for easy access to information. Lila Hammond has been teaching Serbian both in Serbia and the UK for over twenty-five years and presently teaches at the Defence School of Languages, Beaconsfield, UK. i Routledge Essential Grammars Contents Essential Grammars are available for the following languages: Chinese Danish Dutch English Finnish Modern Greek Modern Hebrew Hungarian Norwegian Polish Portuguese Serbian Spanish Swedish Thai Urdu Other titles of related interest published by Routledge: Colloquial Croatian Colloquial Serbian ii Contents Serbian An Essential Grammar Lila Hammond iii First published 2005 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfect Tenses 8.Pdf
    Name Date Lesson 7 Perfect Tenses Teaching The present perfect tense shows an action or condition that began in the past and continues into the present. Present Perfect Dan has called every day this week. The past perfect tense shows an action or condition in the past that came before another action or condition in the past. Past Perfect Dan had called before Ellen arrived. The future perfect tense shows an action or condition in the future that will occur before another action or condition in the future. Future Perfect Dan will have called before Ellen arrives. To form the present perfect, past perfect, and future perfect tenses, add has, have, had, or will have to the past participle. Tense Singular Plural Present Perfect I have called we have called has or have + past participle you have called you have called he, she, it has called they have called Past Perfect I had called we had called had + past participle you had called you had called he, she, it had called they had called CHAPTER 4 Future Perfect I will have called we will have called will + have + past participle you will have called you will have called he, she, it will have called they will have called Recognizing the Perfect Tenses Underline the verb in each sentence. On the blank, write the tense of the verb. 1. The film house has not developed the pictures yet. _______________________ 2. Fred will have left before Erin’s arrival. _______________________ 3. Florence has been a vary gracious hostess. _______________________ 4. Andi had lost her transfer by the end of the bus ride.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Verb Aspect
    Greek Verb Aspect Paul Bell & William S. Annis Scholiastae.org∗ February 21, 2012 The technical literature concerning aspect is vast and difficult. The goal of this tutorial is to present, as gently as possible, a few more or less commonly held opinions about aspect. Although these opinions may be championed by one academic quarter and denied by another, at the very least they should shed some light on an abstruse matter. Introduction The word “aspect” has its roots in the Latin verb specere meaning “to look at.” Aspect is concerned with how we view a particular situation. Hence aspect is subjective – different people will view the same situation differently; the same person can view a situation differently at different times. There is little doubt that how we see things depends on our psychological state at the mo- ment of seeing. The ‘choice’ to bring some parts of a situation into close, foreground relief while relegating others to an almost non-descript background happens unconsciously. But for one who must describe a situation to others, this choice may indeed operate consciously and deliberately. Hence aspect concerns not only how one views a situation, but how he chooses to relate, to re-present, a situation. A Definition of Aspect But we still haven’t really said what aspect is. So here’s a working definition – aspect is the dis- closure of a situation from the perspective of internal temporal structure. To put it another way, when an author makes an aspectual choice in relating a situation, he is choosing to reveal or conceal the situation’s internal temporal structure.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\#1 Work\Greek\Wwgreek\REVISED
    Review Book for Luschnig, An Introduction to Ancient Greek Part Two: Lessons VII- XIV Revised, August 2007 © C. A. E. Luschnig 2007 Permission is granted to print and copy for personal/classroom use Contents Lesson VII: Participles 1 Lesson VIII: Pronouns, Perfect Active 6 Review of Pronouns 8 Lesson IX: Pronouns 11 Perfect Middle-Passive 13 Lesson X: Comparison, Aorist Passive 16 Review of Tenses and Voices 19 Lesson XI: Contract Verbs 21 Lesson XII: -MI Verbs 24 Work sheet on -:4 verbs 26 Lesson XII: Subjunctive & Optative 28 Review of Conditions 31 Lesson XIV imperatives, etc. 34 Principal Parts 35 Review 41 Protagoras selections 43 Lesson VII Participles Present Active and Middle-Passive, Future and Aorist, Active and Middle A. Summary 1. Definition: A participle shares two parts of speech. It is a verbal adjective. As an adjective it has gender, number, and case. As a verb it has tense and voice, and may take an object (in whatever case the verb takes). 2. Uses: In general there are three uses: attributive, circumstantial, and supplementary. Attributive: with the article, the participle is used as a noun or adjective. Examples: @Ê §P@<JgH, J Ð<J", Ò :X88T< PD`<@H. Circumstantial: without the article, but in agreement with a noun or pronoun (expressed or implied), whether a subject or an object in the sentence. This is an adjectival use. The circumstantial participle expresses: TIME: (when, after, while) [:", "ÛJ\6", :gJ">b] CAUSE: (since) [Jg, ñH] MANNER: (in, by) CONDITION: (if) [if the condition is negative with :Z] CONCESSION: (although) [6"\, 6"\BgD] PURPOSE: (to, in order to) future participle [ñH] GENITIVE ABSOLUTE: a noun / pronoun + a participle in the genitive form a clause which gives the circumstances of the action in the main sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spanish Pronominal Clitic System
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante The Spanish pronominal clitic system Luis Pineda Ivan Meza Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Division of Informatics Aplicadas y en Sistemas (IIMAS) University of Edinburgh Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México [email protected] (UNAM) [email protected] Resumen: En este artículo se presenta un modelo del sistema de pronombres clíticos del español. Se presenta una revisión detallada del fenómeno incluyendo la llamada “subida de clíticos” tanto simple como compleja, así como el fenómeno relacionado de los reflexivos, y también las formas impersonales de la pasiva-refleja y la impersonal-activa. Se presenta también un análisis del estatus representacional de los pronombres clíticos y se postula un modelo dual en el que mientras los enclíticos son inflexiones, los proclíticos se realizan como unidades léxicas independientes y por lo mismo son clíticos propiamente. Se presenta también la formalización del modelo en Head- driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG); para esto la maquinaria estándar de HPSG se extiende con un esquema de combinación sintáctica, la regla Head-Proclitic Rule y el principio de clíticos. Este principio establece que en las oraciones bien formadas que incluyen pronombres clíticos todo dominio clítico se encuentra bajo el alcance de un clítico fonológico. Estas nociones se introducen también en el presente artículo. En particular, los dominios clíticos se forma sobre las operaciones de cliticización, composición y subsumsión de clíticos, que también se presentan en este artículo. La teoría ha sido validada mediante la programación de un sistema prototipo en el ambiente Linguistics Knowledge Building (LKB), el cual también se describe en el presente artículo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effectiveness of the Teacher Training Program in English Grammar for the Filipino English Teachers at Non-Profit Private Schools in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand
    The Effectiveness of the Teacher Training Program in English Grammar for the Filipino English Teachers at Non-Profit Private Schools in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand Sr. Serafina S. Castro A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Teaching English as a Second Language Graduate School, Christian University of Thailand B.E. 2558 Copyright Christian University of Thailand iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply grateful to the following significant persons: Dr. Arturo G. Ordonia and Dr. Ruengdet Pankhuenkhat for their guidance and invaluable advice on the organization of this thesis; Asst. Prof. Dr. Singhanat Nomnian for his time and effort in checking this thesis; Miss Zenaida B. Rocamora for her generosity in accepting my invitation to be the trainer of the Teacher Training Program in English Grammar; The 39 Filipino teachers from different non-profit private schools in Ratchaburi province who made themselves available for the Teacher Training Program for six consecutive Sundays; Our Provincial Council of Fr. Francisco Palau Province who gave me the opportunity to broaden my horizons in the Academe; My Community, the Carmelite Missionaries in Thailand, for their unfailing support and countless prayers; Above all, I return the glory and praise to God and a special honor to Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, who has blessed me with perseverance, wisdom and humility in the completion of my work. iv 554022: MAJOR: Master of Arts Program in Teaching English as a Second Language KEYWORDS: EFFECTIVENESS OF ENGLISH TEACHER TRAINING PROGRAM / GRAMMATICAL ERRORS OF FILIPINO ENGLISH TEACHERS / FILIPINO TEACHERS IN RATCHABURI Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relative Order of Foci and Polarity Complementizers
    1 2 3 4 The Relative Order of Foci and Polarity Complementizers: 5 1 6 A Slavic Perspective 7 8 9 Abstract 10 11 According to Rizzi & Bocci’s (2017) suggested hierarchy of the left 12 periphery, fronted foci (FOC) may never precede polarity 13 14 complementizers (POL); yet languages like Bulgarian and Macedonian, 15 where POL may also follow FOC, seem to provide a counterargument to 16 17 such generalization. On the basis of a cross-linguistic comparison of ten 18 Slavic languages, I argue that in the Slavic subgroup the possibility of 19 20 having a focus precede POL is dependent on the morphological properties 21 of the complementizer itself: in languages where the order FOC < POL 22 23 is acceptable, POL is a complex morpheme derived through the 24 incorporation of a lower functional head with a higher one. The order 25 26 FOC < POL is then derived by giving overt spell-out to the intermediate 27 copy of the polarity complementizer rather than to the highest one. 28 29 30 Keywords : Left Periphery, Fronted Foci, Polarity Questions, 31 Complementizers, Bulgarian, Macedonian, Word Order. 32 33 34 I. Introduction 35 36 37 In this article, I will be concerned with accounting for cross-linguistic variation in the 38 relative distribution of two types of left-peripheral elements. The first are polarity 39 40 complementizers (POL), namely complementizers whose function is that of introducing 41 embedded polarity questions; the second are fronted types of constituents in narrow focus. 42 43 I provide an example of a configuration containing both elements in (1), from Italian; in 44 (1), the polarity complementizer “se” (=if) is marked in bold, whereas the fronted focus -in 45 this case, a PP- is in capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ruthenian Or Rusyn) Language in Poland Lemkos
    The 17th Meeting of the Baltic Division of the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names Warszawa, 29 June – 01 July 2015 Maciej Zych Commission on Standardization of Geographical Names Outside the Republic of Poland Romanization rules for the Lemko (Ruthenian or Rusyn) language in Poland Lemkos (Ruthenians or Rusyns) is an ethnic minority which has been recognized in Poland on the basis of the Act of 6th January 2005 on national and ethnic minorities and on the regional languages. The act mentions, in addition to the Lemkos, 9 national minorities: Belorussian, Czech, Lithuanian, German, Armenian, Russian, Slovak, Ukrainian, and Jewish; 3 ethnic minorities – Karait, Roma, and Tartar; as well as one regional language – the Kashubian language. The Act lays down, among others, that traditional names in a minority language for localities, physiographic objects and streets may be used as “additional names” alongside geographic names established in the Polish language. To date (as of 1st June 2015), additional names have been introduced in 1204 localities and parts of them located in 57 communes. There were introduced: 27 Belarusian names, 359 German names, 779 Kashubian names, 9 Lemko names, and 30 Lithuanian names. Additional names in minority languages appear on road signs, they are also used on some maps. Pursuant to the Regulation of the Minister of Administration and Digitization of 14th February 2012 on the national register of geographical names, the Surveyor General of Poland shall maintain the database of the National Register of Geographical Names. In the Register, among others, officially adopted names in minority languages shall be listed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Production of Lexical Tone in Croatian
    The production of lexical tone in Croatian Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie im Fachbereich Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaften der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität zu Frankfurt am Main vorgelegt von Jevgenij Zintchenko Jurlina aus Kiew 2018 (Einreichungsjahr) 2019 (Erscheinungsjahr) 1. Gutacher: Prof. Dr. Henning Reetz 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Sven Grawunder Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 01.11.2018 ABSTRACT Jevgenij Zintchenko Jurlina: The production of lexical tone in Croatian (Under the direction of Prof. Dr. Henning Reetz and Prof. Dr. Sven Grawunder) This dissertation is an investigation of pitch accent, or lexical tone, in standard Croatian. The first chapter presents an in-depth overview of the history of the Croatian language, its relationship to Serbo-Croatian, its dialect groups and pronunciation variants, and general phonology. The second chapter explains the difference between various types of prosodic prominence and describes systems of pitch accent in various languages from different parts of the world: Yucatec Maya, Lithuanian and Limburgian. Following is a detailed account of the history of tone in Serbo-Croatian and Croatian, the specifics of its tonal system, intonational phonology and finally, a review of the most prominent phonetic investigations of tone in that language. The focal point of this dissertation is a production experiment, in which ten native speakers of Croatian from the region of Slavonia were recorded. The material recorded included a diverse selection of monosyllabic, bisyllabic, trisyllabic and quadrisyllabic words, containing all four accents of standard Croatian: short falling, long falling, short rising and long rising. Each target word was spoken in initial, medial and final positions of natural Croatian sentences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potentiality of Pluricentrism Albanian Case Studies and Beyond
    AlbF Albanische Forschungen 41 41 The Potentiality of Pluricentrism of The Potentiality The Potentiality of Pluricentrism Albanian Case Studies and Beyond Edited by Lumnije Jusufi Harrassowitz www.harrassowitz-verlag.de Harrassowitz Verlag Albanische Forschungen Begründet von Georg Stadtmüller Für das Albanien-Institut herausgegeben von Peter Bartl unter Mitwirkung von Bardhyl Demiraj, Titos Jochalas und Oliver Jens Schmitt Band 41 2018 Harrassowitz Verlag . Wiesbaden The Potentiality of Pluricentrism Albanian Case Studies and Beyond Edited by Lumnije Jusufi 2018 Harrassowitz Verlag . Wiesbaden Bibliografi sche Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografi e; detaillierte bibliografi sche Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografi e; detailed bibliographic data are available in the internet at http://dnb.dnb.de For further information about our publishing program consult our website http://www.harrassowitz-verlag.de © Otto Harrassowitz GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden 2018 This work, including all of its parts, is protected by copyright. Any use beyond the limits of copyright law without the permission of the publisher is forbidden and subject to penalty. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. Printed
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Intelligibility Between West and South Slavic Languages Golubovic, Jelena; Gooskens, Charlotte
    University of Groningen Mutual intelligibility between West and South Slavic languages Golubovic, Jelena; Gooskens, Charlotte Published in: Russian Linguistics DOI: 10.1007/s11185-015-9150-9 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2015 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Golubovic, J., & Gooskens, C. (2015). Mutual intelligibility between West and South Slavic languages. Russian Linguistics, 39, 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-015-9150-9 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 24-09-2021 Russ Linguist (2015) 39:351–373 DOI 10.1007/s11185-015-9150-9 Mutual intelligibility between West and South Slavic languages Взаимопонимание между западнославянскими и южнославянскими языками Jelena Golubovic´1 · Charlotte Gooskens1 Published online: 18 September 2015 © The Author(s) 2015.
    [Show full text]