DOCSLIB.ORG

Tetratheca Glandulosa (Glandular Pink-Bell), Was Brought to the EPBC Act List in 2000, Without Documentation of Eligibility, and There Is No Listing Advice Available

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tetratheca Glandulosa (Glandular Pink-Bell), Was Brought to the EPBC Act List in 2000, Without Documentation of Eligibility, and There Is No Listing Advice Available The Minister deleted this species from the vulnerable category, effective from 14 December 2013 Advice to the Minister for the Environment from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) on Amendment to the list of Threatened Species under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 1. Reason for Conservation Assessment by the Committee Many species currently listed as threatened under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 were brought over to the list in 2000 from previous listing processes. In many cases, there is little or no documentation of the rationale for the original listing, and some of these species may not meet the eligibility criteria now required for listing under the EPBC Act. The Committee is engaged in a continuing attempt to ensure that there is adequate documentation available for all listed species, and that the current listing of threatened species is justifiable. Such scrutiny of historic listings will provide greater integrity and credibility to the list, and help to ensure that conservation effort is directed most effectively. In considering possible de-listing of species that may no longer meet (or may never have met) the current eligibility criteria for designation as threatened, it should be noted that the EPBC Act stipulates (at s186 (2A)) that: “The Minister must not delete (whether as a result of a transfer or otherwise) a native species from a particular category unless satisfied that: (a) the native species is no longer eligible to be included in that category: or (b) the inclusion of the native species in that category is not contributing, or will not contribute, to the survival of the native species.” In considering possible de-listings (or any conservation status categorisation) of species, the Committee also notes the desirability of aligning national listing with that of the states, especially for species whose range is entirely restricted to one state. The species under consideration, Tetratheca glandulosa (glandular pink-bell), was brought to the EPBC Act list in 2000, without documentation of eligibility, and there is no listing advice available. It is currently listed as Vulnerable. In the advice here, the Committee seeks to assess whether it meets any of the criteria now used to assess eligibility for listing. Tetratheca glandulosa (glandular pink-bell) 2. Summary of Species Details Taxonomy Conventionally accepted as Tetratheca glandulosa (CHAH, 2008) State/ Territory Listing Listed as vulnerable under the New South Wales Threatened Status Species Act 1995. In public submission to the assessment here, the NSW Threatened Species Committee stated that it believed that it remained eligible for listing. Description A spreading shrub that grows to 50 cm high. The flowers are dark pink, and the flowering period is July to November (NSW NPWS, 2000a, 2000b). Distribution Endemic to New South Wales and known from 150 populations. The northern limit is Sampsons Pass, the southern limit is West Pymble, the eastern limit is Ingleside, and the western limit is East Kurrajong (NSW NPWS, 2000a). The glandular pink-bell has a north-south range of 65 km (Hogbin, 2002). Relevant Plants re-sprout from a woody rootstock following fire, and Biology/Ecology observations indicate that at least some populations of this Tetratheca glandulosa (glandular pink-bell) Listing Advice Page 1 of 7 species may be clonal (Brown, 2003; NSW NPWS, 2000a). Juveniles are uncommon, with the majority of plants consisting of re-sprouting adults (NSW NPWS, 2000a). Successful seed set has not been observed in recent studies of some small, isolated populations (Brown, 2003) presumably due to a disruption of pollination services (NSW SC, pers. comm., 2010). Seed set in the field is low and soil-stored seed bank densities are low with no viable soil-stored seed available (NSW SC, pers. comm., 2012). Payne (1998) speculates that the similar species T. juncea is unable to self-pollinate due to the physical characteristics of the plant’s reproductive parts, and that a pollen vector (possibly a species of native bee) is required for successful pollination (NSW NPWS, 2000a). Threats Known Historically, clearing may have eliminated some populations, and caused fragmentation of some remaining populations. Current threats include high frequency fire (NSW NPWS, 2000b), habitat loss due to land clearing (NSW, NPWS 2000a, 2000b) and bushrock removal in the Pittwater area in Sydney (Pittwater Council, 2007). A low level of sexual recruitment is an additional threat to the survival of the species. Potential Potential threats include habitat degradation through fragmentation, fire, urban/agricultural runoff and stormwater and unrestricted access; illegal track creation; weed invasion; and trampling from people, Equus caballus (horses) and vehicles (NSW NPWS, 2000a). 3. Public Consultation The information used in this assessment was made available for public exhibition and comment for 12 months. Two comments were received and have been considered by the Committee. 4. How judged by the Committee in relation to the EPBC Act criteria and Regulations Criterion 1: It has undergone, is suspected to have undergone or is likely to undergo in the immediate future a very severe, severe or substantial reduction in numbers Not Eligible Criterion element Evidence Reduction in numbers The species has probably suffered some historical decline, but the Committee does not consider that the current rate of decline (i.e. in the last 10 years or three generations) meets this criterion for eligibility (rate of decline of at least 30% over that period). On the basis of current evidence, it is considered that such a rate is also unlikely in the future (10 years or 3 generations). Tetratheca glandulosa (glandular pink-bell) Listing Advice Page 2 of 7 Criterion 2: Its geographic distribution is precarious for the survival of the species and is very restricted, restricted or limited Not eligible Criterion element Evidence Geographic distribution Restricted – The species’ extent of occurrence is 2080 km2 (NSW SC, pers. comm., 2012) and its area of occupancy is AND estimated at 105 km², based on the number of 1 km² grid squares in which the species is thought to occur. This estimate is considered to be of low reliability, as recent ground-truthing at all population sites has not occurred. Geographic distribution No –the geographic distribution is not considered precarious precarious given that the species is known from 150 populations, and occurs in nine national parks that are managed by NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Management Plans, with Fire Management Plans relevant to this species (NSW NPWS, 1992, 1997a, 1997b, 1998a, 1998b, 1998c, 2000c, 2001a, 2001b, 2002, 2005, 2006a, 2006b, 2006c, 2006d, 2006e, 2006f, 200g). Furthermore, this distribution is not considered precarious because it is not likely that all populations will be subjected simultaneously and drastically to any single threat. This criterion relating to precariousness also includes consideration of whether or not populations of the species undergo “extreme” fluctuation. Although populations of this species may vary in numbers according to disturbance regimes, the Committee concludes that such variation is not “extreme”. Therefore the species’ restricted geographic distribution is not considered to be precarious for its survival. Criterion 3: The estimated total number of mature individuals is very low, low or limited; and either (a) evidence suggests that the number will continue to decline at a very high, high or substantial rate; or (b) the number is likely to continue to decline and its geographic distribution is precarious for its survival Not eligible Criterion element Evidence Total no. of mature Insufficient data – It is estimated that there are at least 11 000 individuals mature plants across 150 populations (Hogbin, 2002). However, as the species may be at least partly clonal in AND nature, this may be an overestimate of the number of genetically distinct individuals (NSW SC, pers. comm., 2012). Continued rate of decline The Committee recognises that some past and current threats may have led or be leading to some localised declines. However, the Committee does not consider that the current rate of decline (i.e. in the last 10 years or three generations) meets the criteria for eligibility associated with this criterion (rate of decline of at least 10% over that period). On the basis of current evidence, it is considered that such a rate is unlikely in the future (10 years or 3 generations). Tetratheca glandulosa (glandular pink-bell) Listing Advice Page 3 of 7 OR Total no. of mature Insufficient data – It is estimated that there are at least 11 000 individuals mature plants across 150 populations (Hogbin, 2002). However, as the species is clonal in nature, this may be an AND overestimate of genetically distinct individuals (NSW SC, pers. comm., 2012). Continued decline likely See above AND Geographic distribution No – See Criterion 2 precarious Criterion 4: The estimated total number of mature individuals is extremely low, very low or low Not eligible Criterion element Evidence Total no. of mature The total population is greater than the threshold value individuals required to meet this criterion (less than 1,000 mature individuals). Criterion 5: Probability of extinction in the wild that is at least (a) 50% in the immediate future; or (b) 20% in the near future; or (c) 10% in the medium-term future Not
Load more

Recommended publications
  • October 2010 Rundown.Ppp
    The WOODSTOCK RUNDOWN October 2010 Internet addres s: www.woodstockrunners.org.au Email : [email protected] Facebook Group : http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=30549208990 Email Results and Contributions to : [email protected] Memberships : https://www.registernow.com.au/secure/Register.aspx?ID=66 Uniform Orders : https://www.registernow.com.au/secure/Register.aspx?ID=503 Postal Address : PO Box 672, BURWOOD NSW 1805 The Rundown On Members A top ten finish and a PB in the Sydney Marathon last month was a brilliant result for Brendan at the Sydney Running Festival. This was backed up by a 1st overall result and another Half Marathon PB in the Penrith Half. Is there any stopping our Club Champion??? We eagerly await his results from Melbourne where Brendan will represent NSW in the Marathon. John Dawlings has been busy coordinating the Balmain Fun Runs to be held on Sunday October 31. Let’s hope we see a great turnout of Woodstock members both competing and helping out on the day. We were shocked to hear of Roy’s bypass surgery followed three days later by more surgery to install a pacemaker. Roy is now at a friend’s home and recovery is progressing well. We wish you the very best, Roy and we’re assuming there will be some great runs coming up following your complete recovery. Also on the sick list was Emmanuel Chandran who was admitted to hospital with a severe bout of food poisoning. You won’t be eating at that venue again, will you, Emmanuel.
    [Show full text]
  • GBMWHA Summary of Natural & Cultural Heritage Information
    GREATER BLUE MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE AREA Summary of Natural & Cultural Heritage Information compiled by Ian Brown Elanus Word and Image for NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service November 2004 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Essential Facts 3 3. World Heritage Values 5 4. Geography, Landscape and Climate 6 5. Geology and Geomorphology 8 6. Vegetation 13 7. Fauna 15 8. Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 16 9. Non-Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 18 10. Conservation History 20 11. Selected References 24 Summary of Natural and Cultural Heritage Information Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area November 2004 1 1. INTRODUCTION This document was prepared as a product of the Interpretation and Visitor Orientation Plan for the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. It is intended primarily as a summary reference of key information for use by those who are preparing public information and interpretation for the world heritage area. It is not intended to be fully comprehensive and anyone requiring detailed information on any topic is encouraged to refer to the list of selected references and additional material not listed. It is also recommended that all facts quoted here are checked from primary sources. A major source for this document was the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area Nomination (see reference list), which is a very useful compendium of information but of limited availability. All other key sources used in compiling this summary are listed in the references, along with some other useful documents which were not consulted. Some items of information contained here (eg. total area of wilderness and comparisons with other east coast wilderness areas) have been derived from original research for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Friends of Lane Cove National Park Help Support Their Work and Keep in Touch with Happenings in the Park
    How to Help FAIRYLAND Lane Cove National Park There is plenty to do and opportunities for all, Individuals, Groups or Companies. Bushcare is great way of learning more about your local environment while helping to preserve it for future generations. Ideal for one off corporate or community days, or regular monthly sessions. Join with The Friends of Lane Cove National Park Help support their work and keep in touch with happenings in the park Find out more at www.friendsoflanecovenationalpark.org.au Contact us at [email protected] or speak to the Lane Cove National Park Volunteer Bushcare Co-ordinator 0419 753 806 Produced by Friends of Lane Cove National Park With assistance from Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority and The Australian Government’s Caring for 0ur Country Program History, Heritage and Ecology Where Threats Situated right next to one of the fastest growing commercial centres in Weeds are a major threat in this as in Sydney, less than 3 kilometres from Chatswood and less than 10 kilometres so many other areas. Most of the local soils are derived from from the centre of Sydney is Fairyland, part of Lane Cove National Park. sandstone and are very low in nutrients. The almost 42 hectares of bushland sandwiched between Delhi Road and Surprisingly this has resulted in a great the Lane Cove River provides a home for endangered species including diversity of plants that have adapted to Powerful Owls, and other species such these conditions. Weeds, mainly plants as Echidnas which, while not on the en- from overseas, generally gain a foothold dangered list, are extremely uncommon when ’man’ has disturbed the soil and changed conditions, this can often be this close to the centre of a major city.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves
    The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Mapping Rare Vegetation Communities: Improving Techniques to Assist Land-Use Planning and Conservation
    Defining and mapping rare vegetation communities: improving techniques to assist land-use planning and conservation Stephen A. J. Bell BSc. (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Environmental and Life Sciences The University of Newcastle February 2013 Declaration Statement of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Statement of Collaboration I hereby certify that the concepts embodied in Chapter 2 of this thesis have been done in collaboration with a fellow researcher at this university. I have included as part of the thesis in Chapter 2 a statement clearly outlining the extent of collaboration with whom and under what auspices. Stephen A. J. Bell Preface “The vegetated landscape …. on first appearance presents a bewildering display of living matter, a higgledy-piggledy mass of trunks, leaves, branches, shrubs and grasses seemingly without form. The more observant may notice that the higgledy-piggledy mass varies from one place to another, that in some places there are trees as tall as large buildings while in other places there are no trees at all …. By the application of a systematic approach to viewing vegetation the bewildering display of plant life can take on new meaning thus altering one’s perception of what is being seen .… Suddenly the jumble of plant life reveals structures and beauties probably hitherto unseen”.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawk Cafe Ideas Sheet
    The Great Outdoors Open the door - it is right outside! BACKYARDS IDEAS • Make a frog play pond ...or a fish pond.....in a dish - make sure you have a toy frog or fish first! • Make a fairy/dinosaur garden in a large dish using leaves, flowers moss, pebbles, sand, dirt, grass, plastic dino's • Read Wombat Stew and go and make one in old pots and pans • Create a waterfall - are great on a hot day • Play in a shallow tray of water with boats • Paint pictures on the paving or fence with water and big brushes • Draw on the paving with chalk - have a theme - pirate island, crocodile creek, fairy dell • Imagine - make a boat out of a laundry basket, house out of a large box • The sandpit - one day it is a beach, the next an island. • Make a "Science Box" - explore the garden - look for bugs, look in mulch under leaves of trees, find spiders in webs, search for the spider when the web is empty. • Scavenger hunt - find things different shapes, things beginning with each letter of the alphabet • Search for a rainbow - rainbow game - collect some paint swatches from your favourite hardware or painting store and find things in the garden the same colour. • Cubbies houses/tents and tee-pees. - as Kids get older graduate from the Pop up tents to constructing their own tents. Give them a tarp, some rope and tent pegs....let them see what they can do....Keep watch and let them have a go - jump in to help just before they give up in frustration or when they have tied each other up in the rope.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources (NSW) Pty Ltd 'S WT PRIMAR NDTR1
    EIS 1790 Widemere Estate: Bora! Resources (NSW) Pty Ltd 's WT PRIMAR NDTR1 fAO66847 L c>C /ccTh Widemere Lstate Amendment to State Environmental Planning Policy No. 59 Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Ltd r -,---,k- - Ofli) I LI!IIIPJIOL LJUI ).))) EU i UaOr Delivering sustainable SOil!tIOfIS iii 0 more corupelilive world 7,w) Boral Resources (NS\N) Pty Ltd December 200 8010584 Approved by: Judy McKittrick - Position: Project Director www.entn.com Signed: Date: (1 21 December 2001 Euviron,nenlal Resources Management Australia Ply Ltd Quality System Jiii.irce.; ipr JRJ H :-.s hi i lrl iJ1s1t1 lii L\vcii }:lIillLllYiLlIL1 lsiieiuenI AusmiiIi '(v lid A( N 00277H 24e (ERNl disH (liCliLl1(. 1 he I eporl rclie up's dule, ILIrvevs, 1r'durdrncnlsu1d rel1s lakeis l or under t he i 'arliculci' tines and coisd i lions specified herein. Any find jigs, ci sitel nsons or reconi n etsdn Lions only apply to the aforenien tinned circn instances nd no rea Icr reliance should he a ssu nd or H saws by I he ClienI. Furthermore, the report l's,ss been prepared solely for use by (he Clien I and 11KM stccepls no 'esponsbililv lorik rweb'r oiler parties. TABLE OF CONTENTS Puge No. 1. INTRODUCTION I 2. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA 3 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION 3 2.2 SITE HISTORY 3 2.3 SURROUNDING LAND USES 7 3. PLANNING CONTROLS 9 3.1 INTRODUCTION 9 3.2 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING POLICIES 9 3.2.1 Central Western Sydney Economic and Employment Area 9 3.2.2 Remediation of Land 10 3.2.3 Integrating Land Use and Transport 11 3.3 REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLANS 11 3.3.1 Georges River Catchment 11 3.3.2 Extractive Industry 12 3.3.3 Western Sydney Regional Park 13 3.4 LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLANS 13 3.4.1 Fairfield Local Environmental Plan 1994 13 3.4.2 Hoiroyd Local Environmental Plan 13 3.5 OTHER PLANNING POLICIES 14 3.5.1 Shaping Western Sydney - The Planning Strategy for Western Sydney 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Hornsby Shire Council
    HORNSBY SHIRE COUNCIL BEROWRA CREEK ESTUARY MANAGEMENT STUDY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN January 2000 HORNSBY SHIRE COUNCIL BEROWRA CREEK ESTUARY MANAGEMENT STUDY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN January 2000 Webb, McKeown & Associates Pty Ltd Prepared by: ___________________________ Level 2, 160 Clarence Street, SYDNEY 2000 Telephone: (02) 9299 2855 Facsimile: (02) 9262 6208 Verified by: ____________________________ 98122:BerowraEMSWord:M6 BEROWRA CREEK ESTUARY MANAGEMENT STUDY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN i to xxvii 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1 1.1. This Management Study............................................................................................................. 1 1.2. The Estuary Management Program.......................................................................................... 1 1.3. The Wider Planning Management Context.............................................................................. 2 1.4. Statement of Joint Intent............................................................................................................ 2 1.5. Community Consultation ........................................................................................................... 4 2. FEATURES OF THE STUDY AREA ....................................................................................6 2.1. Catchment...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Harbour Circle Walk Is These Brochures Have Been Developed by the Walking Volunteers
    To NEWCASTLE BARRENJOEYBARRENJOEY A Four Day Walk Harbour Circle Walk Stages Sydney Harbour is one of the great harbours of the world. This Circle Walk and Loop Walks 5hr 30 between the Harbour and Gladesville Bridges (marked in red on the map) takes four days and totals 59km. It can be walked continuously using overnight Individual leaflets with maps and notes downloadable from www.walkingsydney.net and SYDNEY HARBOUR accommodation, from a base such as the City or Darling Harbour using public www.walkingcoastalsydney.com.au AVALON transport each day, or over any period of time. Harbour Circle Walk in Four Days Day 1 Circular Quay (H8) to Greenwich Wharf (E6) 14km 5hrs Day 1 Circular Quay to Greenwich Wharf 14km 5hrs Day 2 Greenwich Wharf (E6) to Woolwich Wharf (D/E5) 15.5km 5hrs 30mins Day 2 Greenwich Wharf to Woolwich Wharf 15.5km 5hrs 30mins Day 3 Huntleys Point Wharf (A6) to Balmain East Wharf (F7) 14.5km 5hrs Day 3 Huntleys Pt Wharf to Balmain East Wharf 14.5km 5hrs Approximate Walking Times in Hours and Minutes A Harbour 5hr 30 Day 4 Balmain East Wharf (F7) to Circular Quay (H8) 15km 5hrs Day 4 Balmain East Wharf to Circular Quay 15km 5hrs e.g. 1 hour 45 minutes = 1hr 45 Visit www.walkingsydney.net to download leaflets for each day of the four day Harbour Circle Walk in Two Days (or One) Circle Walk 0 8 version of the walk. Each leaflet has a detailed map (1:10k) and historical and Day 1 Circular Quay to Hunters Hill 13km 5hrs 30mins general interest notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Asterolasia Elegans, Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW), Sydney
    National Recovery Plan Asterolasia elegans © Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW), 2011 This work is copyright. However, material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW). Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW) 59-61 Goulburn Street (PO Box A290) Sydney South NSW 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (information & publications requests) TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Fax: (02) 9995 5999 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding the recovery program for Asterolasia elegans are best directed to: The Asterolasia elegans Recovery Plan Coordinator Biodiversity Conservation Section, Metro Branch Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW) PO Box 1967 Hurstville NSW 2220 Phone: 02 9585 6905 Cover illustrator: Reproduced from NSW Flora Online (2006) with permission, © Royal Botanic Gardens & Domain Trust, Sydney Australia. This plan should be cited as follows: Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW) (2011), Recovery Plan for Asterolasia elegans, Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW), Sydney. ISBN 978 1 74122 903 5 October 2008 DECC 2008/391 Printed on recycled paper Disclaimer This recovery plan sets out the actions necessary to stop the decline of, and support the recovery of, the listed threatened species or ecological community. The Australian Government is committed to acting in accordance with the plan and to implementing the plan as it applies to Commonwealth areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of State Conservation Areas
    Review of State Conservation Areas Report of the first five-year review of State Conservation Areas under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 November 2008 Cover photos (clockwise from left): Trial Bay Goal, Arakoon SCA (DECC); Glenrock SCA (B. Peters, DECC); Banksia, Bent Basin SCA (M. Lauder, DECC); Glenrock SCA (B. Peters, DECC). © Copyright State of NSW and Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW. The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW and State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced for educational or non-commercial purposes in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change 59–61 Goulburn Street PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Ph: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Ph: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Ph: 1300 361 967 (national parks information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978-1-74122-981-3 DECC 2008/516 November 2008 Printed on recycled paper Contents Minister’s Foreword iii Part 1 – State Conservations Areas 1 State Conservation Areas 4 Exploration and mining in NSW 6 History and current trends 6 Titles 7 Assessments 7 Compliance and rehabilitation 8 Renewals 8 Exploration and mining in State Conservation Areas 9 The five-year review 10 Purpose of the review 10
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Agency Responses
    03 Agency Responses CONTENTS Submission Summary & Responses Civil Aviation Safety Authority Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council Department of Industry (Crown Lands) Department of Industry (Water) Department of Planning & Environment Department of Primary Industries (Agriculture) Department of Primary Industries (Fisheries) Forestry Corporation of NSW National Parks and Wildlife Services Office of Environment and Heritage Office of Environment and Heritage (Heritage Branch) Resources and Geoscience Roads and Martime Services Rural Fire Service Subsidence Advisory NSW Transport for NSW Agency Consultation Submission Summary & Responses Agency Issue Response Commonwealth No response received N/A Department of Environment Central Coast Councils area of Noted responsibility does not incorporate any Civil Aviation certified or registered aerodromes and Safety Authority therefore CASA has not comment on CCLEP. The CCLEP does not acknowledge the The Draft CCLEP based on the Standard Aboriginal Cultural Landscape & fails to Instrument LEP and as a consolidation of address the requirements of the the current WLEP 2013 and GLEP 2014. proposed future State legislation Any amendments a result of the final (Aboriginal Culture and Heritage Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Bill will be Reforms). made to the Standard Instrument LEP or further considered by the Comprehensive LEP. Culturally sensitive areas are incorrectly The timing and scope of works for the mapped in the Somersby Industrial Consolidated LEP does not allow for an Estate. archaeological study /ground truthing to be undertaken. Until this is resolved, any DA in the locality should be inclusive of a search of OEH is currently undertaking work with the Aboriginal Heritage Investigation Darkinjung to identify culturally Management System (AHIMS). Further significant sites.
    [Show full text]