F&O Drastically Reduces Job Cycle Times

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

F&O Drastically Reduces Job Cycle Times Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy * Issue Number 67 June 2005 Old tech, new mission Advanced nuclear reactor concept borrows from ORNL’s seasoned Molten Salt Reactor ith fossil fuel prices climbing and no and ran with it, putting together a collabora- you get boiling liquid, which you don’t want, Wnew petroleum fields discovered in tion with Sandia and the University of and that limits the temperature at which you decades, nuclear energy is beginning to once California-Berkeley,” says Dan. can operate the reactor,” Dan says. again receive serious consideration as an Gordon later left NTPO to apply his ideas “A typical light-water reactor is running at energy alternative. DOE has embarked upon a to ORNL’s first homeland security science 350ºC. You need about 850ºC to generate program to design the next-generation nuclear program. Charles, of the Nuclear S&T hydrogen on a large scale (see sidebar), which reactor, drawing from a wealth of designs and Division, is one of the nation’s most-cited is a prime objective of DOE’s Advanced ideas. authorities on nuclear Reactor Program.” A proposed next-generation design that is power. It seems illogical that something as hot as attracting attention is based on a previous The most accepted and liquid fluoride salt can “cool” anything. Dan generation’s work: ORNL’s Molten Salt common designs for explains that the liquid salt circulating through Reactor Experiment. Researchers in the Lab’s power generation the reactor actually transfers and distributes Nuclear Technology Program Office and reactors are the (See SALT, page 5) Nuclear Science and Technology Division are water-cooled touting a design that would use hot, liquid reactor the gas- The late Glenn Seaborg (foreground), fluoride salt, which was mixed with uranium cooled reactor. then Atomic Energy Commission fuel in the old MSRE but is “clean” in this Both have their chairman, fires up ORNL’s Molten Salt concept, to cool a power generation reactor. advantages, Dan Reactor in 1968. Technology from the The NTPO’s Dan Ingersoll says the idea says, but they project may boost the arose as a “spare time” project for a group of have their “hydrogen economy.” the Lab’s nuclear technology experts. They drawbacks. prefer the modifier “liquid” over “molten” to “Gas-cooled distinguish between the new concept’s clean reactors are coolant and the old project’s molten mixture cooled with of uranium fuel and salt. helium, which is “Gordon Michaels, who was over the a poor carrier of NTPO at the time, lobbied an idea to use solid heat. With water- reactor fuel and use clean liquid salt as the cooled reactors coolant. Charles Forsberg picked up the ball The wait is over: F&O drastically reduces job cycle times f you’re in the dark, the drain is slow or a average cycle time on routine repair mainte- that FMD calls on from Facilities & Opera- Ibreaker’s thrown, the wait is over. Facilities nance orders to approximately three days. Just tions’ Craft Resources Division are Management Division staff have reduced the a few years ago the average was more than completing 50,000 jobs a year. The work is 40 days. referred to as grade 4 tasks—those that FMD Director Jimmy Stone require no special permit or lockout proce- says the secret of their success dures. They include jobs such as changing lies in the efforts of FMD staff lights, unclogging drains and hanging members and crafts and the pictures. adoption of a scheduling tool. ORNL staff members have often expressed “We schedule the work— frustration over the long wait for certain it’s that simple,” says Jimmy. repairs to be made. Worse, the delays often “We know what jobs need to impeded research. be done and individuals are The gains in efficiency come just as the assigned to accomplish those Lab has grown in terms of both new and old tasks.” facilities and in programmatic work. ORNL’s Complex facility managers new space—mostly the new east campus and their teams meet and use facilities—doesn’t require as much mainte- the scheduling tool to plan nance. On the other hand, as the older facilities get ever older, they need more Curtis Boles resources around customers’ Craft Resources Division’s Reggie Thompson (left) and Herschel service requests in their daily upkeep. And there are more of them. Old Brooks service an electrical panel. Facilities and Operations staff “plan of the day” meetings. facilities currently outnumber the new by members have cut job request cycle times to nearly zero. The roughly 250 workers (See CYCLE, page 2 Harrison, Mezzacappa, Thundat named Corporate Fellows hree researchers— Robert J. Harrison of computational astrophysics initiatives. Tthe Computer Science and Mathematics Tony is a fellow of the American Division, Anthony Mezzacappa of the Physical Society and received the Physics Division and Thomas G. Thundat of Presidential Early Career Award in the Life Sciences Division— have been Science and Engineering in 1999. named UT-Battelle Corporate Fellows. Thomas Thundat is a world leader in The Corporate Fellow designation is the nanomechanical sensors. His work in highest level of recognition for career biomedical engineering and biotechnol- achievements in science and technology, ogy, micromechanical sensors, and performance and leadership. Lab Director nanoscale imaging and detection has Jeff Wadsworth says that awardees’ contribu- been featured in Time magazine. His Harrison Mezzacappa Thundat tions to international leadership in research, numerous national and international new and expanded research programs and honors include two R&D 100 Awards, three received 19 patents for nanomechanical mentoring of staff are vital to the success of Federal Laboratory Consortium in Technol- sensor technologies ranging from medical the Laboratory as a whole. ogy Transfer awards, the Jesse Beams Award, instrumentation to land mine detection. Robert Harrison joined ORNL in 2002 as the Discover Award, ASME Pioneer Award Thomas is a Battelle Distinguished inventor group leader for Computational Chemical and the Scientific American Top 50 Technol- and a Fellow of the American Physical Sciences following a distinguished career at ogy Leaders Award. Society. He is also a research professor of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory where The author of more than 170 scientific physics at UT and a visiting professor at the he was a Battelle Fellow. He holds a joint papers in refereed journals, Thomas has University of Burgundy, France. appointment with the University of Tennes- see, where he is a professor in the chemistry In particular, although the heating and air department. Cycle Continued from page 1 Widely recognized for his work in the conditioning crew is usually going at full tilt, electronic structure of molecules, computa- about 300 to 10. the complex’s aging ventilation system often tional chemistry and high performance A prime example of an aging infrastructure gives problems. The building’s climate algorithms and computing, he is chief is the 4500 complex, the 1950s era home to control is difficult to balance, particularly architect of NWChem, the world’s leading labs and offices that, frankly, doesn’t look that when the seasons change. computational chemistry code, now used at bad on the outside. But the complex literally is Nevertheless, when President Bush visited more than 1000 sites worldwide. a poster child for aging facilities: The 4500 last July on what was arguably the summer’s Tony Mezzacappa, a leader in computa- complex’s problems are outlined on a poster muggiest day, a packed Wigner Audiorium tional astrophysics and a pioneer in the field affixed directly across from Jimmy’s desk. was kept comfortable for several hours. of supernova science, was the first to The 4500 complex is a 700,000-square-foot Older facilities are energy hogs. Jimmy implement Boltzmann kinetic theory to fixer upper. For instance, nearly a third of the notes that the 4500 complex uses 300 percent model neutrino transport during supernova complex’s ventilation supply fans failed more energy per square foot than the energy- explosions, a theoretical and numerical feat during the past year. Fan failures shut down efficiency-certified new facilities. long thought impossible. Since joining labs, which stops R&D work. In one calami- The 4500 complex isn’t the only set of ORNL in 1996, he has conceived, proposed tous event a few years ago, a lightning surge buildings with infirmities. Building 1505 on and now leads the Terascale Supernova blew out 60 fans at once. Then there are the the west end has a high-maintenance chiller Initiative, a multi-million dollar, multiyear usual nuisances like ancient electrical panels, system and a currently inoperable vacuum DOE initiative involving several dozen clogged drains, roof leaks and crumbling system. Many of the Lab’s 350 older researchers at a dozen institutions around the walls. buildings are in similar shape. world. TSI is one of the world’s largest FMD keeps it all running despite the “We have aging infrastructure that causes challenges. operational impacts with increasing fre- quency,” Jimmy says. Jimmy credits the FMD staff with keeping researchers happy (in a recent survey customers said things have generally im- proved) and doing more with less. He gives an example: is published for employees and retirees “The industry standard of square feet that of ORNL, which is managed and janitors are responsible for is 25,000 square operated for the U.S. Department of feet. Our janitors are responsible for an Energy by UT-Battelle. average 55,000 square feet,” he says. Eventually, a facilities upgrade plan and funding will bring many of the old facilities Bill Cabage, editor up to snuff with the newer ones. In the 865/574-4399 or [email protected] meantime, FMD is working to keep the lights on and water running.
Recommended publications
  • IOP, Quarks Leptons and the Big Bang (2002) 2Ed Een
    Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang Second Edition Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang Second Edition Jonathan Allday The King’s School, Canterbury Institute of Physics Publishing Bristol and Philadelphia c IOP Publishing Ltd 2002 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Multiple copying is permitted in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency under the terms of its agreement with the Committee of Vice- Chancellors and Principals. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 0 7503 0806 0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data are available First edition printed 1998 First edition reprinted with minor corrections 1999 Commissioning Editor: James Revill Production Editor: Simon Laurenson Production Control: Sarah Plenty Cover Design: Fr´ed´erique Swist Marketing Executive: Laura Serratrice Published by Institute of Physics Publishing, wholly owned by The Institute of Physics, London Institute of Physics Publishing, Dirac House, Temple Back, Bristol BS1 6BE, UK US Office: Institute of Physics Publishing, The Public Ledger Building, Suite 1035, 150 South Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA Typeset in LATEX2ε by Text 2 Text, Torquay, Devon Printed in the UK by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall Contents
    [Show full text]
  • A Joint Fermilab/SLAC Publication Dimensions of Particle Physics Issue
    dimensions volume 03 of particle physics symmetryA joint Fermilab/SLAC publication issue 05 june/july 06 Cover Physicists at Fermilab ponder the physics of the proposed International Linear Collider, as outlined in the report Discovering the Quantum Universe. Photos: Reidar Hahn, Fermilab Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy volume 03 | issue 05 | june/july 06 symmetryA joint Fermilab/SLAC publication 3 Commentary: John Beacom “In a global fi eld, keeping up with all the literature is impossible. Personal contact is essential, and I always urge students and postdocs to go to meetings and talk to strangers.” 4 Signal to Background An industrial waterfall; education by placemats; a super-clean surface; horned owls; Garden Club for particle physicists; Nobel banners; US Congress meets Quantum Universe. 8 Voices: Milestones vs. History Celebrating a milestone is always enjoyable, but a complete and accurate historical record is invalu- able for the past to inform the future. 10 A Report Like No Other Can the unique EPP2010 panel steer US particle physics away from a looming crisis? Physicists and policy makers are depending on it. 14 SNS: Neutrons for ‘molecular movies’ A new research facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory has produced its fi rst neutrons, presenting new opportunities for studying materials from semiconductors to human enzymes. 20 Battling the Clouds Electron clouds could reduce the brightness—and discovery potential—of the proposed International Linear Collider. Innovative solutions are on the way and might reduce the cost of the machine, too. 24 A (Magnus) Force on the Mound Professional baseball player Jeff Francis of the Colorado Rockies brings a strong arm and a physics background to the playing fi eld: “I bet Einstein couldn’t throw a curveball.” 26 Deconstruction: Spallation Neutron Source Accelerator-based neutron sources such as the SNS can provide pulses of neutrons to probe superconductors, aluminum bridges, lighter and stronger plastic products, and pharmaceuticals.
    [Show full text]
  • US Neutron Facility Development in the Last Half-Century: a Cautionary Tale
    Phys. Perspect. Ó 2015 The Author(s). This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com DOI 10.1007/s00016-015-0158-8 Physics in Perspective US Neutron Facility Development in the Last Half-Century: A Cautionary Tale John J. Rush* Large multi-user facilities serve many thousands of researchers in fields from particle physics to fundamental biology. The great expense—up to billions of current-day dollars— and the complexity of such facilities required access to extensive engineering and research infrastructures, most often found at national laboratories and the largest research univer- sities. Although the development of such facilities has been largely successful and the research results unique and often spectacular, the processes for choosing, funding, and locating them were complex and not always productive. In this review, I describe the troubled efforts over the past fifty years to develop neutron research facilities in the United States. During this period, the US has moved from a preeminent position in neutron-based science to a lesser status with respect to Europe. Several major US centers of excellence have been shut down and replaced with more focused capabilities. I compare the US efforts in neutron facilities with parallel developments in Europe and Asia, discuss the reasons for this state of affairs, and make some suggestions to help prevent similar consequences in the future. Key words: neutron research; national laboratories; Department of Energy; National Institute of Standards and Technology; research reactors; spallation neutron sources; Institut Laue-Langevin; National Academy of Sciences. Introduction A major element in the great expansion both of US and international science since the Second World War has been the development of large multi-user facilities to serve many thousands of researchers around the world with applications in almost all fields, ranging from particle physics to fundamental biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions of Civilizations to International Prizes
    CONTRIBUTIONS OF CIVILIZATIONS TO INTERNATIONAL PRIZES Split of Nobel prizes and Fields medals by civilization : PHYSICS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 CHEMISTRY .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 PHYSIOLOGY / MEDECINE .............................................................................................................................................. 3 LITERATURE ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ECONOMY ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 MATHEMATICS (Fields) .................................................................................................................................................. 5 PHYSICS Occidental / Judeo-christian (198) Alekseï Abrikossov / Zhores Alferov / Hannes Alfvén / Eric Allin Cornell / Luis Walter Alvarez / Carl David Anderson / Philip Warren Anderson / EdWard Victor Appleton / ArthUr Ashkin / John Bardeen / Barry C. Barish / Nikolay Basov / Henri BecqUerel / Johannes Georg Bednorz / Hans Bethe / Gerd Binnig / Patrick Blackett / Felix Bloch / Nicolaas Bloembergen
    [Show full text]
  • Clifford Shull’S Life Occurred in the Period Between 1942 and 1944
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES C LIFFORD GLENWOOD SHULL 1 9 1 5 — 2 0 0 1 A Biographical Memoir by R O B E R T D . S HULL Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2010 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. CLIFFORD GLENWOOD SHULL September 23, 1915–March 31, 2001 BY ROBERT D . SHULL LIFFORD GLENWOOD SHULL WAS ELECTED to membership Cin the National Academy of Sciences in 1975. He had earlier, in 1956, been admitted to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and would in 1994 be awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics. These and other honors were in recogni- tion of his pioneering accomplishments in the development of neutron scattering techniques for atomic and magnetic structure determination. The Nobel Prize was awarded 50 years after the beginning of his discoveries and 15 years after he had retired as an emeritus professor of physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In this case the scientific community had ample time to see the ramifications of his achievements. Between 1946 and 1994, several other Nobel Prizes were awarded to individuals for discoveries or predictions verified partially through the use of neutron scattering methods. The Nobel Prize was not something to which Cliff aspired. “The achievements of past winners are so phenom- enal it’s beyond one’s scope to think of being in that class. I certainly had no feelings of delusion about joining such people,” expressed Cliff to videographers for the Nobel Foundation just after announcement of his selection as one of the 1994 recipients.1 Cliff’s humility was a personality 4 BIOGRA P HICAL MEMOIRS trait that governed the way he approached science, and it was a characteristic that set him apart from others.2 One of his great sorrows was that Ernest Wollan, a colleague who pioneered the development of neutron scattering with him in the early years, was not alive in 1994 to share the Nobel Prize with him.
    [Show full text]
  • Note: This Is a Draft of a Paper Being Submitted for Publication. Contents of This Paper Should Not Be Quoted Or Referred to Without Permission of the Author
    Note: This is a draft of a paper being submitted for publication. Contents of this paper should not be quoted or referred to without permission of the author. CONF-8509288 —1 EARLY HISTORY OF HEUTRON SCATTERING AT OAK RIDGE DE87 000027 M. K. Wilkinson Bv acceptance of this article, the publisher or recipiant acknowledge* tne VS. Government': right to retain a nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright covering the article. Prepared by the SOLID STATE DIVISION OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Operated by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Oak Ridge, Tennessee July 1985 DIOTRIBUTIJN UF ni(u W^A^T is UNLIMITED DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned riehts. Refer- ence herein to any specific comr • :ial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom- mendation, or favoring by the United Stales Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or iny agency thereof. EARLY HISTORY OF NEUTRON SCATTERING AT OAK RIDGE M. K. Wilkinson Solid State Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 ABSTRACT Most of the early development of neutron scattering techniques utilizing reactor neutrons occurred at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory during the years immediately following World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neutron and Early History XIV School of Neutron ScaEring (Sons)
    The Neutron and Early History XIV School of Neutron Scaering (SoNS) Internaonal School of Neutron Science and Instrumentaon Erice, Sicily, 1-9 April 2016 John M. Carpenter Argonne Naonal Laboratory and Oak Ridge Naonal Laboratory CONTENTS About neutrons Discoveries: radioac=vity, cosmic rays, Chadwick Neutron-energy terminology Neutron interac=ons and produc=on reac=ons Reactors Accelerators Evolu=on of facili=es 98-6245 uc/vlb 2 The Neutron The neutron and its quark structure (udd), wave packet, wave vector, spin, and magne=c dipole and electric dipole moments. The Neutron Neutrons consist of three quarks, one “up” quark and two “down” quarks, udd. Protons are uud. Hadron charges are the sum of charges of cons=tuent quarks. There are no free quarks. Neutrons interact with other hadrons through the strong force, and with each other and with their surroundings through the electromagne=c force. To a very small extent, neutrons can have an electric dipole moment (so small as not yet to have been observed, in spite of long-term efforts). The Quarks Quarks are the fundamental cons=tuents of the hadrons. The Hadrons There are two families of Hadrons: mesons, with two quarks, and baryons, with three quarks. Hadrons interact through the strong force; charged hadrons also interact through the electro- magne2c force. Even uncharged hadrons have magne2c moments associated with their spins. Neutron Decay Free neutrons decay by e- emission to a proton, accompanied by an anti-neutrino, and have a mean lifetime Te = 881.5 seconds = 14.7 minutes and a half-life T1/2 = 611.0 seconds: T =611s n ! ⎯ 1⎯ 2 ⎯ → !e− + p + ν + 782 !ke V .
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 105 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 143 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1997 No. 160—Part II Senate TIME TO CLEAN UP AMERICA’S almost every major America city, but Mr. President, none of this is nec- COAL-FIRED POWERPLANTS are transformed into acids that con- essary and eliminating these problems Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, the Sen- tribute to both acid rain and fine par- need not trigger the sort of regional ate will soon recess until the beginning ticulate matter. Together with the fine conflicts that characterized the some- of this Congress’ second Session in Jan- particles formed by sulfur dioxide times bitter ten year struggle to enact uary of 1998. That provides time to de- emissions, they contribute to tens of a federal program to control acid rain. velop a thoughtful proposal on one of thousands of unnecessary deaths. Fi- There are ways of burning coal so that the most pressing environmental nally, carbon-rich coal adds to global it produces only a tiny fraction of the threats confronting the United States warming, which has increased the tem- air pollution now being emitted by as a whole, and especially the Midwest peratures of Earth’s air, oceans, and these powerplants. And, since virtually and the Northeast: namely, the rivers soils, while raising sea levels and trig- all of these powerplants are reaching gering meltdowns of glaciers and ice- of pollution that stream from the the age at which significant invest- caps.
    [Show full text]
  • A Diamond in Dogpatch: the 75Th Anniversary of the Graphite Reactor Part 2: the Postwar Years
    A diamond in Dogpatch: The 75th anniversary of the Graphite Reactor Part 2: The Postwar Years Following World War II, the Graphite Reactor was the foundation upon which Oak Ridge National Laboratory was built, and it gave birth to many of the technologies we take for granted in the 21st century. By Sherrell R. Greene sions accomplished, however, the futures of the Met Lab and Clinton Labs were in art 1 of this article described a se- doubt. Clinton had an ace in the hole—the ries of unlikely events that resulted Graphite Reactor—a tool that had already Pin the construction of the Graphite shown itself to be a remarkably versatile Reactor in the hills of East Tennessee in a vessel for probing the New World. The location so remote that the Met Lab scien- wizards at Clinton would waste no time in tists and others in the Manhattan Project finding additional uses for it. dubbed it “Dogpatch.” Indeed, almost ev- During the later months of 1944 through erything about the Graphite Reactor story the summer of 1945, scientists at Clinton could be characterized as “unlikely”—its converged on a strategy for the lab’s post- location, the partnership between the sci- war role in the New World. Their strategy entists at the Chicago Met Lab and DuPont was built around two central themes: (1) that produced a remarkably simple but ca- exploitation of the Graphite Reactor and pable machine, the incredibly short con- the scientists’ radiochemical separations struction schedule, its trouble-free startup expertise; and (2) the development of new Graphic: ORNL and operation, and its contributions to the “piles” with different fuel cycles and ex- The original Oak Ridge National success of the Manhattan Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Promotion File
    PROMOTION APPLICTION FOR DR. DAVID GARRISON TO THE RANK OF FULL PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS SUBMITTED 2017 PROMOTION FOR DR. DAVID GARRISON 1. STATEMENT 2. SUMMARY 2.1. TEACHING AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES AT UHCL 2.1.1. Coursework 2.1.2. Teaching 2.1.2.1. Teaching Evaluation Summary 2.1.2.2. Written Comments 2.1.3. Other Educational Activities 2.1.3.1. Faculty Advisor 2.1.3.2. Individual Instruction 2.1.3.3. Organized Mentoring 2.1.4. Program Development 2.1.4.1. New Program Development 2.1.4.2. Program Marketing 2.1.4.3. Student Enrollment 2.2. RESEARCH AND SCHOLARLY ACTIVITIES 2.2.1. Research Interests 2.2.2. Publications and Talks 2.2.3. Proposals and Funding 2.2.4. Other Scholarly Activities 2.2.5. Honors 2.2.6. Research Development 2.3. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES 2.3.1. Service to the Profession 2.3.1.1. Membership 2.3.2. Service to the University 2.3.2.1. University Level 2.3.2.2. School Level 2.3.2.3. Division Level 2.3.2.4. Student Advising 2.3.3. Service to the Community 3. CURRICULUM VITAE 4. ANNUAL REPORTS 4.1. 2002 Annual Report 4.2. 2003 Annual Report 4.3. 2004 Annual Report 4.4. 2005 Annual Report 4.5. 2006 Annual Report 4.6. 2007 Annual Report 4.7. 2008 Annual Report 4.8. 2009 Annual Report 4.9. 2010 Annual Report 4.10. 2011 Annual Report 4.11. 2012 Annual Report 4.12. 2013 Annual Report 4.13.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded the Top 100 the Seed to This End
    PROC. OF THE 11th PYTHON IN SCIENCE CONF. (SCIPY 2012) 11 A Tale of Four Libraries Alejandro Weinstein‡∗, Michael Wakin‡ F Abstract—This work describes the use some scientific Python tools to solve One of the contributions of our research is the idea of rep- information gathering problems using Reinforcement Learning. In particular, resenting the items in the datasets as vectors belonging to a we focus on the problem of designing an agent able to learn how to gather linear space. To this end, we build a Latent Semantic Analysis information in linked datasets. We use four different libraries—RL-Glue, Gensim, (LSA) [Dee90] model to project documents onto a vector space. NetworkX, and scikit-learn—during different stages of our research. We show This allows us, in addition to being able to compute similarities that, by using NumPy arrays as the default vector/matrix format, it is possible to between documents, to leverage a variety of RL techniques that integrate these libraries with minimal effort. require a vector representation. We use the Gensim library to build Index Terms—reinforcement learning, latent semantic analysis, machine learn- the LSA model. This library provides all the machinery to build, ing among other options, the LSA model. One place where Gensim shines is in its capability to handle big data sets, like the entirety of Wikipedia, that do not fit in memory. We also combine the vector Introduction representation of the items as a property of the NetworkX nodes. In addition to bringing efficient array computing and standard Finally, we also use the manifold learning capabilities of mathematical tools to Python, the NumPy/SciPy libraries provide sckit-learn, like the ISOMAP algorithm [Ten00], to perform some an ecosystem where multiple libraries can coexist and interact.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Sources for America's Future
    DOE/ER-0576P Neutron Sources for America’s Future Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Panel on Neutron Sources January 1993 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Research Washington, D.C. 20585 This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE Contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; prices available from (423) 576-8401. Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 487-4650. Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1 Preface ................................................................................................................................ 5 Scientific, Technological, and Medical Importance of Neutrons ...................................... 9 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3.2 Scientific Importance ................................................................................................ 3.3 Technological Applications ...................................................................................... 3.4 Medical Uses of Radioisotopes ................................................................................. U.S. Neutron Community .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]