DOCSLIB.ORG

Professor Promotion File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PROMOTION APPLICTION FOR DR. DAVID GARRISON TO THE RANK OF FULL PROFESSOR OF PHYSICS SUBMITTED 2017 PROMOTION FOR DR. DAVID GARRISON 1. STATEMENT 2. SUMMARY 2.1. TEACHING AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES AT UHCL 2.1.1. Coursework 2.1.2. Teaching 2.1.2.1. Teaching Evaluation Summary 2.1.2.2. Written Comments 2.1.3. Other Educational Activities 2.1.3.1. Faculty Advisor 2.1.3.2. Individual Instruction 2.1.3.3. Organized Mentoring 2.1.4. Program Development 2.1.4.1. New Program Development 2.1.4.2. Program Marketing 2.1.4.3. Student Enrollment 2.2. RESEARCH AND SCHOLARLY ACTIVITIES 2.2.1. Research Interests 2.2.2. Publications and Talks 2.2.3. Proposals and Funding 2.2.4. Other Scholarly Activities 2.2.5. Honors 2.2.6. Research Development 2.3. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES 2.3.1. Service to the Profession 2.3.1.1. Membership 2.3.2. Service to the University 2.3.2.1. University Level 2.3.2.2. School Level 2.3.2.3. Division Level 2.3.2.4. Student Advising 2.3.3. Service to the Community 3. CURRICULUM VITAE 4. ANNUAL REPORTS 4.1. 2002 Annual Report 4.2. 2003 Annual Report 4.3. 2004 Annual Report 4.4. 2005 Annual Report 4.5. 2006 Annual Report 4.6. 2007 Annual Report 4.7. 2008 Annual Report 4.8. 2009 Annual Report 4.9. 2010 Annual Report 4.10. 2011 Annual Report 4.11. 2012 Annual Report 4.12. 2013 Annual Report 4.13. 2014 Annual Report 4.14. 2015 Annual Report 4.15. 2016 Annual Report 5. CORRESPONDENCE: 3RD YEAR REVIEW 6. CORRESPONDENCE: TENURE REVIEW 7. CORRESPONDENCE: PROMOTION TO FULL PROFESSOR 8. Publications 9. Letters 1. STATEMENT My career in Physics began in 1993 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. I was fortunate to be advised and mentored by three Nobel Prize winners: Phillip Sharp (1993 Biology), Clifford Shull (1994 Physics) and Wolfgang Ketterle (2001 Physics). During my time at MIT, I participated in several research projects in many different aspects of physics research. I worked with several professors including: Prof’s David Pritchard, John King, Clifford Will, Michael Ogilvie and Jacqueline Hewitt. After MIT, I attended graduate school at The Pennsylvania State University where I worked with Dr.’s Jorge Pullin and Pablo Laguna in The Center for Gravitational Physics and Geometry. While there, I also had the privilege to work with several distinguished researchers (such as Prof’s Gabriella Gonzalez and Lee Samuel Finn) on a variety of projects. My primary work was in the area of numerical relativity, a field that combines computational physics with Einstein’s general theory of relativity in order to simulate astrophysical events. I was originally hired as a Visiting Assistant Professor at the University of Houston Clear Lake (UHCL), in the fall of 2002. During the negotiation of my contract with UHCL, I was told that my position would be reviewed during the first year and that a tenure-track position may become available. I was given the option to apply the visiting year toward my probationary period if the position became tenure-track. After joining the faculty of UHCL, I was led to believe that the Physical Sciences program was unfocused and lacking in students who were qualified to assist in research efforts such as mine. I was also led to believe that the university wanted to rebuild not only the Physical Sciences program but also establish a Physics program. Because of this, I have devoted a large amount of my time to date developing both programs’ curricula and infrastructures so that these issues could be resolved. My mission was to give students a solid foundation in physics and to increase the enrollment of the program. In the spring of 2003, changing my position to tenure-track became a high priority within the school; however, a statewide hiring freeze made this impossible for several months. During the summer of 2003, the hiring freeze was lifted and my position was converted to tenure-track assistant professor. I received one year of credit as promised by the administration. In the Spring of 2008, I was promoted to Associate Professor with Tenure. Since then, I have continued to develop as an instructor and researcher while working in service to my program, the university and our community. My efforts have resulted in a complete Physics program, which now offers a Bachelors, Masters and Collaborative PhD in Physics. I have also served in several leadership positions in the school and university including the SCE Dean search committee, the UHCL Presidential search committee and the Faculty Senate as President. This report will detail my efforts to establish a physics program while developing my research program. These two programs were designed to meet the needs of the local community and involve students in cutting-edge physics research. In the process of building these programs, I have committed myself to excellence in teaching, research and service. I feel that these areas are all part of any successful career in physics. I believe that excellence in teaching must involve not only solid teaching evaluations, but also a strong record of individualized instruction and curriculum/program development. Within a few weeks of coming to UHCL, I began work on developing a Physics program, which has been one of the most successful in the state of Texas. The idea was to develop a degree plan that prepares students for work in Physics research, while maintaining the Physical Science program’s support of Space Science. This was made possible by a web- based survey program, which I developed and sent out to the local community using an email distribution list of interested parties. The data that was collected from the surveys was used to justify the formation of a new masters degree in physics in 2004. The new Physics Program not only prepares students to do physics research, it also prepares them for PhD work in Physics and Astronomy while enhancing the skills of practicing engineers. The biggest difference between the Physics program I developed and the old Physical Sciences program is the requirement that all students complete a set of core physics courses and do an independent research project before graduating. Because of these requirements, not only are all students in the new program qualified to participate in research, they are also required to have this experience. In the physics community, research experiences are an invaluable part of the educational process. This Physics Program requires that the other faculty and I developed several new undergraduate and graduate courses. I developed the following courses: • Mathematical Methods in Physics 1 and 2 (Including an Online version of Mathematical Methods in Physics 1) • Methods in Computational Physics • Classical Mechanics • Electrodynamics 1 and 2 • Fundamentals of Space-time • Using Mathematica to Solve Physics Problems • Research Seminar • General Relativity I also facilitated the development of: • Laboratory for Modern Astronomy • Graduate Astronomy • Modern Physics • Quantum Mechanics 1 and 2 • Statistical Mechanics • Plasma Physics • Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering 1 and 2 • Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics • Mechanics of Materials • Fluids and Heat Transfer In addition to developing this program, I also devoted a significant amount of effort in promoting it. I attended several academic fairs, hosted public talks on campus and developed new ways to promote the program through posters, fliers, websites and articles. In order to serve the local community better, I conducted an electronic survey about once every two years (2002, 2003, 2004, 2006 and 2009). The first two surveys lead to the approval of the Physics Master’s Degree. The third, in 2004, helped me establish the Professional Physics Sub-Plan in Technical Management. The 2006 survey, led to the development of a Collaborative PhD Physics Program with the University of Houston Central Campus (UH) and later the BS in Physics. In 2010, we discontinued the general needs assessment surveys and started a Physics Advisory Board. The board’s advise lead to the development of our Engineering Physics sub-plan. In 2012, I developed a proposal for planning authority to convert our Collaborative Physics PhD program into a full Joint PhD program. The data supporting this proposal came from a 2012 survey of UHCL Physics alumni, current graduate students and potential graduate students. These developments were only possible because of the success of the Physics Master’s degree program. In 2004, I developed a strategic plan for the development of the Physics program as part of our biennial planning process. Aspects of the plan include the development of the Professional Physics MS, for training technical managers; developing the steps to web- enhance the core physics courses in order to make them more accessible to our students; a plan to develop more undergraduate leveling courses; and the development of a Physics PhD, which could be implemented on our campus. Although many people thought this plan was overly ambitious, every element of this plan was accomplished before I was granted tenure in 2008. In 2013, I performed a thorough strategic analysis of the physics program including an Environmental Analysis, 5 Forces Analysis and Core Capabilities Analysis. I found that the program should focus on countering misperceptions about the difficultly of introductory level physics courses and lack of physics career options by utilizing the latest Physics Education Research (PER) and working harder with our career services office to get our students professional employment. In 2014, the AIP officially recognized our Masters program as the 7th out of 25 highest producing Masters-level Physics Departments in the US for years 2010, 2011 and 2012.
Recommended publications
  • IOP, Quarks Leptons and the Big Bang (2002) 2Ed Een

    IOP, Quarks Leptons and the Big Bang (2002) 2Ed Een

    Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang Second Edition Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang Second Edition Jonathan Allday The King’s School, Canterbury Institute of Physics Publishing Bristol and Philadelphia c IOP Publishing Ltd 2002 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Multiple copying is permitted in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency under the terms of its agreement with the Committee of Vice- Chancellors and Principals. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 0 7503 0806 0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data are available First edition printed 1998 First edition reprinted with minor corrections 1999 Commissioning Editor: James Revill Production Editor: Simon Laurenson Production Control: Sarah Plenty Cover Design: Fr´ed´erique Swist Marketing Executive: Laura Serratrice Published by Institute of Physics Publishing, wholly owned by The Institute of Physics, London Institute of Physics Publishing, Dirac House, Temple Back, Bristol BS1 6BE, UK US Office: Institute of Physics Publishing, The Public Ledger Building, Suite 1035, 150 South Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA Typeset in LATEX2ε by Text 2 Text, Torquay, Devon Printed in the UK by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall Contents
  • A Joint Fermilab/SLAC Publication Dimensions of Particle Physics Issue

    A Joint Fermilab/SLAC Publication Dimensions of Particle Physics Issue

    dimensions volume 03 of particle physics symmetryA joint Fermilab/SLAC publication issue 05 june/july 06 Cover Physicists at Fermilab ponder the physics of the proposed International Linear Collider, as outlined in the report Discovering the Quantum Universe. Photos: Reidar Hahn, Fermilab Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy volume 03 | issue 05 | june/july 06 symmetryA joint Fermilab/SLAC publication 3 Commentary: John Beacom “In a global fi eld, keeping up with all the literature is impossible. Personal contact is essential, and I always urge students and postdocs to go to meetings and talk to strangers.” 4 Signal to Background An industrial waterfall; education by placemats; a super-clean surface; horned owls; Garden Club for particle physicists; Nobel banners; US Congress meets Quantum Universe. 8 Voices: Milestones vs. History Celebrating a milestone is always enjoyable, but a complete and accurate historical record is invalu- able for the past to inform the future. 10 A Report Like No Other Can the unique EPP2010 panel steer US particle physics away from a looming crisis? Physicists and policy makers are depending on it. 14 SNS: Neutrons for ‘molecular movies’ A new research facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory has produced its fi rst neutrons, presenting new opportunities for studying materials from semiconductors to human enzymes. 20 Battling the Clouds Electron clouds could reduce the brightness—and discovery potential—of the proposed International Linear Collider. Innovative solutions are on the way and might reduce the cost of the machine, too. 24 A (Magnus) Force on the Mound Professional baseball player Jeff Francis of the Colorado Rockies brings a strong arm and a physics background to the playing fi eld: “I bet Einstein couldn’t throw a curveball.” 26 Deconstruction: Spallation Neutron Source Accelerator-based neutron sources such as the SNS can provide pulses of neutrons to probe superconductors, aluminum bridges, lighter and stronger plastic products, and pharmaceuticals.
  • US Neutron Facility Development in the Last Half-Century: a Cautionary Tale

    US Neutron Facility Development in the Last Half-Century: a Cautionary Tale

    Phys. Perspect. Ó 2015 The Author(s). This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com DOI 10.1007/s00016-015-0158-8 Physics in Perspective US Neutron Facility Development in the Last Half-Century: A Cautionary Tale John J. Rush* Large multi-user facilities serve many thousands of researchers in fields from particle physics to fundamental biology. The great expense—up to billions of current-day dollars— and the complexity of such facilities required access to extensive engineering and research infrastructures, most often found at national laboratories and the largest research univer- sities. Although the development of such facilities has been largely successful and the research results unique and often spectacular, the processes for choosing, funding, and locating them were complex and not always productive. In this review, I describe the troubled efforts over the past fifty years to develop neutron research facilities in the United States. During this period, the US has moved from a preeminent position in neutron-based science to a lesser status with respect to Europe. Several major US centers of excellence have been shut down and replaced with more focused capabilities. I compare the US efforts in neutron facilities with parallel developments in Europe and Asia, discuss the reasons for this state of affairs, and make some suggestions to help prevent similar consequences in the future. Key words: neutron research; national laboratories; Department of Energy; National Institute of Standards and Technology; research reactors; spallation neutron sources; Institut Laue-Langevin; National Academy of Sciences. Introduction A major element in the great expansion both of US and international science since the Second World War has been the development of large multi-user facilities to serve many thousands of researchers around the world with applications in almost all fields, ranging from particle physics to fundamental biology.
  • AC2 Report to IUPAP 2016.Pages

    AC2 Report to IUPAP 2016.Pages

    Report of Affiliated Commission AC.2 for 2015-16 submitted by Beverly K. Berger, Secretary The principal event of the year for the International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation (AC2) was the triennial GR conference. The 21st International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, GR21, was held 10 – 15 July 2016 at Columbia University. The scientific highlights of the meeting were talks and activities related to the first direct detection of gravitational waves by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration—a momentous celebration of the Centennial of Einstein's first presentation of general relativity in November 1915. Approximately 650 registered participants attended the meeting. Sponsorship from IUPAP for this meeting, and AC2's own limited funds, assisted some of these participants. As usual, the conference had plenary talks in the morning, covering the whole field of AC2's interests. In the afternoons there were parallel contributed papers and poster sessions. There were 15 plenary talks (5 of the speakers being women) and 17 parallel sessions (7 of the chairs being women). Abstracts of all submissions became available online1 after the meeting. The abstracts of all parallel session talks and posters and the slides from the parallel session talks are available on the conference website.2 Slides from the plenary talks will be available soon. During the meeting, several prize winners were honored by AC2 and GWIC (WG11): The IUPAP Young Scientist Prize in General Relativity and Gravitation was first awarded at GR20 in 2013. The three winners since then, Jorge Santos, Stanford University and Cambridge University (2014), Nicolas Yunes, Montana State University (2015), and Ivan Agullo, Louisiana State University (2016) were recognized at the meeting.
  • Consistent Discretizations and Quantum Gravity 3 Singularity, the Value of the Lapse Gets Modified and Therefore the “Lattice Spacing” Before and After Is Different

    Consistent Discretizations and Quantum Gravity 3 Singularity, the Value of the Lapse Gets Modified and Therefore the “Lattice Spacing” Before and After Is Different

    Proceedings of the II International Conference on Fundamental Interactions Pedra Azul, Brazil, June 2004 Canonical quantum gravity and consistent discretizations Rodolfo Gambini Instituto de F´ısica, Facultad de Ciencias, Igua esq. Mataojo, Montevideo, Uruguay Jorge Pullin Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA We review a recent proposal for the construction of a quantum theory of the gravita- tional field. The proposal is based on approximating the continuum theory by a discrete theory that has several attractive properties, among them, the fact that in its canonical formulation it is free of constraints. This allows to bypass many of the hard conceptual problems of traditional canonical quantum gravity. In particular the resulting theory im- plies a fundamental mechanism for decoherence and bypasses the black hole information paradox. Keywords: canonical, quantum gravity, new variables, loop quantization 1. Introduction Discretizations are very commonly used as a tool to treat field theories. Classically, when one wishes to solve the equations of a theory on a computer, one replaces arXiv:gr-qc/0408025v1 9 Aug 2004 the continuum equations by discrete approximations to be solved numerically. At the level of quantization, lattices have been used to regularize the infinities that plague field theories. This has been a very successful approach for treating Yang– Mills theories. The current approaches to non-perturbatively construct in detail a mathematically well defined theory of quantum gravity both at the canonical level 1 and at the path integral level 2 resort to discretizations to regularize the theory. Discretizing general relativity is more subtle than what one initially thinks.
  • Jorge Pullin Horace Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Louisiana State University

    Jorge Pullin Horace Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Louisiana State University

    Complete quantization of vacuum spherically symmetric gravity Jorge Pullin Horace Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Louisiana State University With Rodolfo Gambini University of the Republic of Uruguay In spite of their simplicity, spherically symmetric vacuum space-times are challenging to quantize. One has a Hamiltonian and (one) diffeomorphism constraint and, like those in the full theory, they do not form a Lie algebra. Therefore a traditional Dirac quantization is problematic. There has been some progress in the past: Kastrup and Thiemann (NPB399, 211 (1993)) using the “old” (complex) Ashtekar variables were able to quantize through a series of gauge fixings. The resulting quantization has waveforms Ψ(M), with M being a Dirac observable. There is no sense in which the singularity is “resolved”. Kucha ř (PRD50, 3961 (1994)) through a series of canonical transformation using the traditional metric variables isolated the single degree of freedom of the model (the ADM mass). Results similar to Kastrup and Thiemann’s. Campiglia, Gambini and JP (CQG24, 3649 (2007)) using modern Ashtekar variables gauge fixed the diffeomorphism constraint and rescaled the Hamiltonian constraint to make it Abelian. The quantization ends up being equivalent to those of Kastrup, Thiemann and Kucha ř. Various authors (Modesto, Boehmer and Vandersloot, Ashtekar and Bojowald, Campiglia, Gambini, JP) studied the quantization of the interior of a black hole using the isometry to Kantowski-Sachs and treating it as a LQC. The singularity is resolved. Gambini and JP (PRL101, 161301 (2008)) studied the semiclassical theory for the complete space-time of a black hole. The singularity is replaced by a region of high curvature that tunnels into another region of space-time.
  • Grav19 April 8Th–12Th, 2019, C´Ordoba, Argentina

    Grav19 April 8Th–12Th, 2019, C´Ordoba, Argentina

    Grav19 April 8th–12th, 2019, Cordoba,´ Argentina Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 9:00-9:50 J. Pullin P. Ajith 8:45 F. Pretorius D. Siegel A. Perez´ 10:00-10:30 C OFFEE yLive streaming EHT/ESO C OFFEE 10:30-11:20 I. Agullo J. R. Westernacher 11:00 Coffee/discussion I. Racz´ J. Peraza 11:30-12:20 H. Friedrich O. Sarbach #12:00. S Liebling/L.Lehner F. Beyer F. Carrasco 12:20-14:00 **Reception Lunch** LUNCH 14:00-14:50 J. Frauendiener A. Rogers J. Jaramillo O. Moreschi 14:50-15:10 R. Gleiser B. Araneda A. Acena˜ C. del Pilar Quijada 15:10-15:30 T. Madler¨ L. Combi A. Giacomini E. Eiroa 15:30-15:50 P. Rioseco J. Bad´ıa enjoy I. Gentile G. Figueroa Aguirre 15:50-16:10 C OFFEE your C OFFEE 16:10-16:30 J. Oliva F. Canfora´ free M. Arganaraz˜ M. Ramirez 16:30-16:50 M. Rubio A. Petrov afternoon F. Abalos O. Fierro Mondaca 16:50-17:10 O. Baake G. Crisnejo P. Anglada M. J. Guzman´ 17:10-17:30 N. Miron´ Granese N. Poplawski 18:30-20:00 **Wine and Cheese** ?? 19:00hs. Jorge Pullin ?Gabriela Gonzalez: Public Lecture (Charla Publica,´ libre y gratuita). Friday, April 5: 20.00 HS at Observa- torio Astronomico´ de Cordoba:´ LAPRIDA 854, Auditorio MIRTA MOSCONI. ?? Jorge Pullin: La telenovela de las ondas gravitacionales: desde Newton en 1666 hasta Estocolmo 2017, Martes 9, 19:00HS en el SUM de la Plaza Cielo Tierra (Bv. Chacabuco 1300).
  • Alejandro R. Corichi

    Alejandro R. Corichi

    Alejandro R. Corichi Instituto de Matematicas, UNAM, Apartado Postal 61-3, Morelia, Michoacan, 58090, M¶exico, Phone/Fax: +52 (55) 5623 2769/2732 , [email protected] , http://www.matmor.unam.mx/~corichi, Personal Mexican. Date of birth: 2nd of November of 1967. Married male with two children. Information Education The Pennsylvania State University, USA Ph.D. in Physics, August 1997. Thesis: Interplay between topology, gauge ¯elds and gravity. Adviser: Prof. Abhay Ashtekar. Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, M¶exico Licenciado (Bs./M.Sc.) in Physics, October 1991. Thesis: Introduction to Geometrodynamics. Experience Visiting Professor Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos Penn State University August 2008 { July 2009 I visited the Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos at Penn State conducting research in quantum gravity. Researcher/Professor Institute of Mathematics Universidad Nacional Aut¶onomade M¶exico August 2005 { I joined the Institute for Mathematics, also at UNAM, where a quantum gravity group is now consolidating, including myself, R. Oeckl and J.A. Zapata. Head of the Department of Gravitation and Field Institute for Nuclear Sciences (ICN) Theory Universidad Nacional Aut¶onomade M¶exico September 2002 { August 2004. I served as head of the Department of Gravitation and Field Theory, consisting of 13 permanent faculty members, 4 postdoctoral associates and 20 graduate students. Research Associate Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Mississippi, USA September 2001 { August 2002 Conducted research in classical and quantum gravity. In quantum gravity, the statistical approach to semiclassical states in loop quantum gravity in collaboration with L. Bombelli and O. Winkler. Studies of coherent and semi-classical states for constrained systems.
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae Luis R. Lehner April 2020 1 Personal Data: Name and Surname: Luis R. LEHNER Marital Status: Married Date of Birth: July 17th. 1970 Current Address: Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline St. N. Waterloo, ON, N2L 2Y5 Canada Tel.: 519) 569-7600 Ext 6571 Mail Address: [email protected] Fax: (519) 569-7611 2 Education: • Ph.D. in Physics; University of Pittsburgh; 1998. Title: Gravitational Radiation from Black Hole spacetimes. Advisor: Jeffrey Winicour, PhD. • Licenciado en F´ısica;FaMAF, Universidad Nacional de C´ordoba;1993. Title: On a Simple Model for Compact Objects in General Relativity. Advisor: Osvaldo M. Moreschi, PhD. 3 Awards, Honors & Fellowships • \TD's 10 most influential Hispanic Canadian" 2019. • \Resident Theorist" for the Gravitational Wave International Committee 2018-present. • Member of the Advisory Board of the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics (UCSB) 2016-2020. • Executive Committee Member of the CIFAR programme: \Gravity and the Extreme Universe" 2017-present. • Member of the Scientific Council of the ICTP South American Institute for Fundamental Research (ICTP- SAIFR) 2015-present. • Fellow International Society of General Relativity and Gravitation, 2013-. • Discovery Accelerator Award, NSERC, Canada 2011-2014. • American Physical Society Fellow 2009-. • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Fellow 2009-. 1 • Kavli-National Academy of Sciences Fellow 2008, 2017. • Louisiana State University Rainmaker 2008. • Baton Rouge Business Report Top 40 Under 40. 2007. • Scientific Board Member of Teragrid-NSF. 2006-2009. • Institute of Physics Fellow. The Institute of Physics, UK, 2004 -. • Phi Kappa Phi Non-Tenured Faculty Award in Natural and Physical Sciences. Louisiana State University, 2004. • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Associate Member, 2004 -.
  • Contributions of Civilizations to International Prizes

    Contributions of Civilizations to International Prizes

    CONTRIBUTIONS OF CIVILIZATIONS TO INTERNATIONAL PRIZES Split of Nobel prizes and Fields medals by civilization : PHYSICS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 CHEMISTRY .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 PHYSIOLOGY / MEDECINE .............................................................................................................................................. 3 LITERATURE ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ECONOMY ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 MATHEMATICS (Fields) .................................................................................................................................................. 5 PHYSICS Occidental / Judeo-christian (198) Alekseï Abrikossov / Zhores Alferov / Hannes Alfvén / Eric Allin Cornell / Luis Walter Alvarez / Carl David Anderson / Philip Warren Anderson / EdWard Victor Appleton / ArthUr Ashkin / John Bardeen / Barry C. Barish / Nikolay Basov / Henri BecqUerel / Johannes Georg Bednorz / Hans Bethe / Gerd Binnig / Patrick Blackett / Felix Bloch / Nicolaas Bloembergen
  • Clifford Shull’S Life Occurred in the Period Between 1942 and 1944

    Clifford Shull’S Life Occurred in the Period Between 1942 and 1944

    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES C LIFFORD GLENWOOD SHULL 1 9 1 5 — 2 0 0 1 A Biographical Memoir by R O B E R T D . S HULL Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2010 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. CLIFFORD GLENWOOD SHULL September 23, 1915–March 31, 2001 BY ROBERT D . SHULL LIFFORD GLENWOOD SHULL WAS ELECTED to membership Cin the National Academy of Sciences in 1975. He had earlier, in 1956, been admitted to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and would in 1994 be awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics. These and other honors were in recogni- tion of his pioneering accomplishments in the development of neutron scattering techniques for atomic and magnetic structure determination. The Nobel Prize was awarded 50 years after the beginning of his discoveries and 15 years after he had retired as an emeritus professor of physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In this case the scientific community had ample time to see the ramifications of his achievements. Between 1946 and 1994, several other Nobel Prizes were awarded to individuals for discoveries or predictions verified partially through the use of neutron scattering methods. The Nobel Prize was not something to which Cliff aspired. “The achievements of past winners are so phenom- enal it’s beyond one’s scope to think of being in that class. I certainly had no feelings of delusion about joining such people,” expressed Cliff to videographers for the Nobel Foundation just after announcement of his selection as one of the 1994 recipients.1 Cliff’s humility was a personality 4 BIOGRA P HICAL MEMOIRS trait that governed the way he approached science, and it was a characteristic that set him apart from others.2 One of his great sorrows was that Ernest Wollan, a colleague who pioneered the development of neutron scattering with him in the early years, was not alive in 1994 to share the Nobel Prize with him.
  • Note: This Is a Draft of a Paper Being Submitted for Publication. Contents of This Paper Should Not Be Quoted Or Referred to Without Permission of the Author

    Note: This Is a Draft of a Paper Being Submitted for Publication. Contents of This Paper Should Not Be Quoted Or Referred to Without Permission of the Author

    Note: This is a draft of a paper being submitted for publication. Contents of this paper should not be quoted or referred to without permission of the author. CONF-8509288 —1 EARLY HISTORY OF HEUTRON SCATTERING AT OAK RIDGE DE87 000027 M. K. Wilkinson Bv acceptance of this article, the publisher or recipiant acknowledge* tne VS. Government': right to retain a nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright covering the article. Prepared by the SOLID STATE DIVISION OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Operated by Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc. for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Oak Ridge, Tennessee July 1985 DIOTRIBUTIJN UF ni(u W^A^T is UNLIMITED DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned riehts. Refer- ence herein to any specific comr • :ial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom- mendation, or favoring by the United Stales Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or iny agency thereof. EARLY HISTORY OF NEUTRON SCATTERING AT OAK RIDGE M. K. Wilkinson Solid State Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 ABSTRACT Most of the early development of neutron scattering techniques utilizing reactor neutrons occurred at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory during the years immediately following World War II.