Depositional System and Source Rock Potential of the Sharon Springs Formation in Colorado

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Depositional System and Source Rock Potential of the Sharon Springs Formation in Colorado DEPOSITIONAL SYSTEM AND SOURCE ROCK POTENTIAL OF THE SHARON SPRINGS FORMATION IN COLORADO by Evan S. Allred A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date: Signed: Evan S. Allred Signed: Dr. Stephen A. Sonnenberg Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date: Signed: Dr. M. Stephen Enders Professor and Department Head: Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT The Sharon Springs Member of the Pierre Shale has recently been divided and reclassified as the Gammon Ferruginous Formation and Sharon Springs Formation, with the Pierre Shale being upgraded to group status. Deposition took place between 82 and 77 Ma in a conformable succession of facies following the Niobrara Highstand, and an overall progradation of siliciclastics into the Western Interior Seaway. These units gradually decrease over time in calcite content associated with chalk filled fecal pellets, to clay and quartz dominated deposits with a large constituent of pyrite. This interval has the potential to be a significant source rock where thermally mature, within the Denver and Piceance basins. Biomarker analyses on oil collected form the Florence-Cañon City Field suggest that the Sharon Springs has contributed to production from fractured members of the Pierre Shale up section. Thermal maturity indicators in biomarkers indicate that the oil produced from the Pierre is slightly more mature than source rock extracts taken from core in the field, suggesting that oil has a mixed source and likely migrated from further down dip. As a potential source rock, it is important to understand how these units were deposited and where they are most organic-rich. The previous model for Sharon Springs deposition and preservation of organic carbon was pelagic sedimentation in an anoxic, stratified and stagnant water column. Observations made in core and outcrop suggest that the Sharon Springs and Gammon Ferruginous formations were deposited by offshore sediment gravity flows. Storms likely assisted in reworking shelf muds and transporting them offshore where they are hydrodynamically sorted and often contain normally-graded beds, ripples and bioturbation. During the process of offshore transport, fine-grained sediment and organic matter which is commonly adsorbed onto clay grains or amalgamated into clay floccules, are concentrated, resulting in elevated accumulations of organic carbon. Organic carbon was then preserved through euxinic conditions below the sediment water interface due to low oxygen diffusion rates in the fine-grained material. Biogenic fecal pellets are abundant in the lower Gammon Ferruginous Formation, representing pelagic sedimentation in the most distal reaches of the basin. This interval, however, is not exceptionally organic-rich. This suggests that the prograding siliciclastic clinothems not only concentrated fine-grained sediment and organic matter at the distal portion of the deposits, but may be the primary mode of transport for organic matter to iii offshore regions. As the siliciclastics stepped basinward, the carbonate factory shut down and was replaced by organic-rich clay having a TOC of ~5% in the more proximal regions and reaching ~14% in the more distal areas where there is less detrital dilution. Bioturbation in the offshore deposits suggests that the water column was not euxinic or stagnant, but often oxygenated and active. Active water column mixing then resulted in high rates of primary productivity, and increased likelihood of organic matter preservation. The Western Interior Seaway was likely shallow enough (~200 m) to be frequently churned by storms, bringing nutrients into the photic zone, and resulting in algal blooms. The frequency of these storms then allowed enough organic matter to be deposited on the basin floor that preservation was likely, despite the oxygenated bottom-water conditions. This method of organic matter preservation is contrary to the pelagic sedimentation model, but explains the heterogeneity and presence of detrital feeding organisms within the organic rich units. Regional stacking patterns in the Wattenberg Field area of Weld County, Colorado show a progradation of facies to the northeast. Biostratigraphic correlation connects the progradation of these clinoforms, to prograding sandstones on the western margin of the basin associated with the Blackhawk and Castlegate Sandstone. Similar turbidite deposits and normally-graded siliciclastics have also been described within the Prairie Canyon Member of the Mancos, between the more proximal sandstones and basinal shales. This biostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic succession of facies presents a strong argument for a connection of the depositional system in eastern Colorado to the prograding units in western Colorado. Through the Wattenberg field area, however, local tectonics complicate the deposition of these siliciclastics, resulting in variability in unit thickness. This structural high is associated with faulting along the Colorado mineral belt, and has been shown to migrate to the south over time. Faulting also results in thermal conduits and a heat anomaly, resulting in the Sharon Springs and Gammon Ferruginous formations being thermally mature in this area and a potential source rock for exploration. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... xvii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... xviii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Motivation .................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Objectives and Purpose .............................................................................................. 11 1.3 Previous Work ............................................................................................................ 14 1.4 Geologic Setting ......................................................................................................... 19 1.5 Data and Methods ....................................................................................................... 27 CHAPTER 2 CORE AND OUTCROP ..................................................................................... 31 2.1 Facies Descriptions ..................................................................................................... 31 2.1.1 Bentonite .................................................................................................... 32 2.1.2 Shale ........................................................................................................... 34 2.1.3 Debrite ........................................................................................................ 41 2.2 Core Descriptions ....................................................................................................... 42 2.2.1 Tebo 32-3H ................................................................................................. 44 2.2.2 Bibma 13-21 ............................................................................................... 50 2.2.3 Tebo-Bibma Correlation ............................................................................. 52 2.2.4 Windmill 05-23H ....................................................................................... 55 2.2.5 Byrkit 15-30 ............................................................................................... 58 2.2.6 Windmill-Byrkit Correlation ...................................................................... 61 2.2.7 Child VO .................................................................................................... 63 2.2.8 Bull 42-4 ..................................................................................................... 68 v 2.3 Outcrop Descriptions .................................................................................................. 75 2.3.1 Paonia, CO .................................................................................................. 76 2.3.2 Sharon Springs, KS .................................................................................... 82 2.4 Summary .................................................................................................................... 84 CHAPTER 3 GEOCHEMISTRY .............................................................................................. 86 3.1 Elemental Geochemistry ............................................................................................ 86 3.1.1 Windmill 05-23H ....................................................................................... 87 3.1.2 Bull 42-4 ..................................................................................................... 90 3.2 Source Rock Geochemistry ........................................................................................ 92 3.2.1 Petroleum Exploration Potential ...............................................................
Recommended publications
  • 25. PELAGIC Sedimentsi
    ^ 25. PELAGIC SEDIMENTSi G. Arrhenius 1. Concept of Pelagic Sedimentation The term pelagic sediment is often rather loosely defined. It is generally applied to marine sediments in which the fraction derived from the continents indicates deposition from a dilute mineral suspension distributed throughout deep-ocean water. It appears logical to base a precise definition of pelagic sediments on some limiting property of this suspension, such as concentration or rate of removal. Further, the property chosen should, if possible, be reflected in the ensuing deposit, so that the criterion in question can be applied to ancient sediments. Extensive measurements of the concentration of particulate matter in sea- water have been carried out by Jerlov (1953); however, these measurements reflect the sum of both the terrigenous mineral sol and particles of organic (biotic) origin. Aluminosilicates form a major part of the inorganic mineral suspension; aluminum is useful as an indicator of these, since this element forms 7 to 9% of the total inorganic component, 2 and can be quantitatively determined at concentration levels down to 3 x lO^i^ (Sackett and Arrhenius, 1962). Measurements of the amount of particulate aluminum in North Pacific deep water indicate an average concentration of 23 [xg/1. of mineral suspensoid, or 10 mg in a vertical sea-water column with a 1 cm^ cross-section at oceanic depth. The mass of mineral particles larger than 0.5 [x constitutes 60%, or less, of the total. From the concentration of the suspensoid and the rate of fallout of terrigenous minerals on the ocean floor, an average passage time (Barth, 1952) of less than 100 years is obtained for the fraction of particles larger than 0.5 [i.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentary Rocks
    OCN 201 Coastal Sediments Lab Sediment Particle Size Distribution and Turbidity Flows Although this laboratory will pertain to oceanic sediments, similar processes can also be observed on land and in other aquatic systems (i.e., lakes, wetlands). This reading should supplement your understanding of the processes that affect particle size distribution across a marine system (i.e., barrier reef). Next week’s laboratory exercises will focus on demonstrating some of these principles, and give you experience in quantifying particle size distributions across a barrier reef. Sediments Sediment, by definition, is any loose or fragmented material. Hence, loose sand, shells and their fragments, dead leaves, and mud can all be categorized as sediment. All sediments have a source from which they originate. Pelagic sediments are those found in the open ocean, and whose origin cannot be traced to a specific landmass. They include red clay, radiolarian ooze, diatom ooze, and calcareous (nanofossil or foraminefera) ooze (see images of selected biogenic tests – see page 8 of Laboratory#5). Terrigenous sediments are those whose origin is traceable to a specific land (terra) area. They include a series of variously colored muds, volcanic debris, coral muds, and turbidity flow deposits. Lithogenous sediments are derived from weathering of rock (lithos) material, but their source cannot be readily identified. Red clay in the abyssal ocean is lithogenous. Much of the sediment on the sea floor of the open ocean is lithogenous clay that was transported thousands of miles from its origin. Calcareous sediments are found over oceanic rises and platforms, whereas red clays are typically distributed in the deep ocean basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Rp,, OCEANOGRAPHY DEEP SEA. WASTE DISPOSAL
    INTERNAL DOCUMENT rp,, OCEANOGRAPHY DEEP SEA. WASTE DISPOSAL [This document should not be cited in a published bibliography, and is supplied for the use of the recipient only]. a - INSTITUTE OF \ z OCEAN OGRAPHIC SCIENCES %V. '"oos INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHIC SCIENCES Worm ley, Godalming, Surrey, GU8 BUB. (042-879-4141) (Director: Dr. A. S. Laughton) Bidston Observatory, Crossway, Birkenhead, Taunton, Merseyside, L43 7RA. Somerset, TA1 2DW. (051 652-2396) (0823-86211) (Assistant Director: Dr. D. E. Cartwright) (Assistant Director: M.J. Tucker) OCEANOGRAPHY rslatsd to DEBP SEA. WASTE DISPOSAL A Survev commissioned bv the Department of the Environment In^tltnt^ or Oceanogr^phie Sciences, Woruloy, ^onalming, Surrey GDW September 1978 •r; Wn fr^'W'w , -ig^at igGr^SSjes*'': 'i'-.r '&#0 4 i®i": iSSfflSj*-; ,*h :gSm '# .f f. .-< ' ^ ' \" . ' .- : - '-' '"i" "'"Tn'fWr^ ^ "rf'iVf. i.^t. %& g,*;gh^ h#wk^, . '::Y '"?' "%v t /:;,f »"-^iY: ^jw&j ,<1.^....-L. ,. t '.4..^,.,.. r X e^^TDy; . '.*,,.:'*,;wVk..^... , .. WIS3 li A) pi if r 31*: 'AM jngraa $#* ;- :Y^-; •••••: if'**J KAW W!&#' %wt;pfy W,.x u t wk%Wg%#&0 '•'£i'5dteii>irt PAWR t .* jpM»rtte»ai«l'*<M»r» •"i £i 'li-,'".!,,• -•t'iA^r., - !MfcSs-d»e. * CONTENTS Page i-% INTRODUCTION 1.1 CHAPTER 1 GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS 2.1 CHAPTER 2 GEOCHEMISTRY 3.1 CHAPTER 3 PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY 4.1 CHAPTER 4 MARINE BIOLOGY INTROnUCTZON The Sixth Report of the Royal CommisaioA on Environmental Pollution (Cmnd 66l8) recommended that a programme of research is needed to ensure that safe containment for an indefinite period of lon^-lived, highly radioactive wastes is feasible before a commitment is made to a large scale nuclear programme, In response to the Commission^ recommendations the Government decided to keep open and study further two options for the disposal of waste in the ocean (Cmnd 6820).
    [Show full text]
  • Modern and Ancient Hiatuses in the Pelagic Caps of Pacific Guyots and Seamounts and Internal Tides GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Modern and ancient hiatuses in the pelagic caps of Pacific guyots and seamounts and internal tides GEOSPHERE; v. 11, no. 5 Neil C. Mitchell1, Harper L. Simmons2, and Caroline H. Lear3 1School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK doi:10.1130/GES00999.1 2School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska-Fairbanks, 905 N. Koyukuk Drive, 129 O’Neill Building, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA 3School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK 10 figures CORRESPONDENCE: neil .mitchell@ manchester ABSTRACT landmasses were different. Furthermore, the maximum current is commonly .ac .uk more important locally than the mean current for resuspension and transport Incidences of nondeposition or erosion at the modern seabed and hiatuses of particles and thus for influencing the sedimentary record. The amplitudes CITATION: Mitchell, N.C., Simmons, H.L., and Lear, C.H., 2015, Modern and ancient hiatuses in the within the pelagic caps of guyots and seamounts are evaluated along with of current oscillations should therefore be of interest to paleoceanography, al- pelagic caps of Pacific guyots and seamounts and paleotemperature and physiographic information to speculate on the charac- though they are not well known for the geological past. internal tides: Geosphere, v. 11, no. 5, p. 1590–1606, ter of late Cenozoic internal tidal waves in the upper Pacific Ocean. Drill-core Hiatuses in pelagic sediments of the deep abyssal ocean floor have been doi:10.1130/GES00999.1. and seismic reflection data are used to classify sediment at the drill sites as interpreted from sediment cores (Barron and Keller, 1982; Keller and Barron, having been accumulating or eroding or not being deposited in the recent 1983; Moore et al., 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • 45. Sedimentary Facies and Depositional History of the Iberia Abyssal Plain1
    Whitmarsh, R.B., Sawyer, D.S., Klaus, A., and Masson, D.G. (Eds.), 1996 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 149 45. SEDIMENTARY FACIES AND DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY OF THE IBERIA ABYSSAL PLAIN1 D. Milkert,2 B. Alonso,3 L. Liu,4 X. Zhao,5 M. Comas,6 and E. de Kaenel4 ABSTRACT During Leg 149, a transect of five sites (Sites 897 to 901) was cored across the rifted continental margin off the west coast of Portugal. Lithologic and seismostratigraphical studies, as well as paleomagnetic, calcareous nannofossil, foraminiferal, and dinocyst stratigraphic research, were completed. The depositional history of the Iberia Abyssal Plain is generally characterized by downslope transport of terrigenous sedi- ments, pelagic sedimentation, and contourite sediments. Sea-level changes and catastrophic events such as slope failure, trig- gered by earthquakes or oversteepening, are the main factors that have controlled the different sedimentary facies. We propose five stages for the evolution of the Iberia Abyssal Plain: (1) Upper Cretaceous and lower Tertiary gravitational flows, (2) Eocene pelagic sedimentation, (3) Oligocene and Miocene contourites, (4) a Miocene compressional phase, and (5) Pliocene and Pleistocene turbidite sedimentation. Major input of terrigenous turbidites on the Iberia Abyssal Plain began in the late Pliocene at 2.6 Ma. INTRODUCTION tured by both Mesozoic extension and Eocene compression (Pyrenean orogeny) (Boillot et al., 1979), and to a lesser extent by Miocene com- Leg 149 drilled a transect of sites (897 to 901) across the rifted mar- pression (Betic-Rif phase) (Mougenot et al., 1984). gin off Portugal over the ocean/continent transition in the Iberia Abys- Previous studies of the Cenozoic geology of the Iberian Margin sal Plain.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Water Biogenic Sediment Off the Coast of Florida
    Deep-Water Biogenic Sediment off the Coast of Florida by Claudio L. Zuccarelli A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Charles E. Schmidt College of Science In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL May 2017 Copyright 2017 by Claudio L. Zuccarelli ii Abstract Author: Claudio L. Zuccarelli Title: Deep-Water Biogenic Sediment off the Coast of Florida Institution: Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. Anton Oleinik Degree: Master of Science Year: 2017 Biogenic “oozes” are pelagic sediments that are composed of > 30% carbonate microfossils and are estimated to cover about 50% of the ocean floor, which accounts for about 67% of calcium carbonate in oceanic surface sediments worldwide. These deposits exhibit diverse assemblages of planktonic microfossils and contribute significantly to the overall sediment supply and function of Florida’s deep-water regions. However, the composition and distribution of biogenic sediment deposits along these regions remains poorly documented. Seafloor surface sediments have been collected in situ via Johnson- Sea-Link I submersible along four of Florida’s deep-water regions during a joint research cruise between Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute (HBOI) and Florida Atlantic University (FAU). Sedimentological analyses of the taxonomy, species diversity, and sedimentation dynamics reveal a complex interconnected development system of Florida’s deep-water habitats. Results disclose characteristic microfossil assemblages of planktonic foraminiferal ooze off the South West Florida Shelf, a foraminiferal-pteropod ooze through the Straits iv of Florida, and pteropod ooze deposits off Florida’s east coast. The distribution of the biogenic ooze deposits is attributed to factors such as oceanographic surface production, surface and bottom currents, off-bank transport, and deep-water sediment drifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbidity Flows – Evidence for Effects on Deep- Sea Benthic Community Productivity Is Ambiguous but the Influence on Diversity Is Clearer Katharine T
    https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-359 Preprint. Discussion started: 14 October 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Review and syntheses: Turbidity flows – evidence for effects on deep- sea benthic community productivity is ambiguous but the influence on diversity is clearer Katharine T. Bigham1, 2, Ashley A. Rowden1, 2, Daniel Leduc2, David A. Bowden2 5 1School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand 2National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand Correspondence to: Katharine T. Bigham ([email protected]) Abstract. Turbidity flows – underwater avalanches – are large-scale physical disturbances that are believed to have profound and lasting impacts on benthic communities in the deep sea, with hypothesised effects on both productivity and 10 diversity. In this review we summarize the physical characteristics of turbidity flows and the mechanisms by which they influence deep sea benthic communities, both as an immediate pulse-type disturbance and through longer term press-type impacts. Further, we use data from turbidity flows that occurred hundreds to thousands of years ago as well as three more recent events to assess published hypotheses that turbidity flows affect productivity and diversity. We found, unlike previous reviews, that evidence for changes in productivity in the studies was ambiguous at best, whereas the influence on regional 15 and local diversity was more clear-cut: as had previously been hypothesized turbidity flows decrease local diversity but create mosaics of habitat patches that contribute to increased regional diversity. Studies of more recent turbidity flows provide greater insights into their impacts in the deep sea but without pre-disturbance data the factors that drive patterns in benthic community productivity and diversity, be they physical, chemical, or a combination thereof, still cannot be identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts Vliz Young Marine Scientists’ Day
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS VLIZ YOUNG MARINE SCIENTISTS’ DAY VIVES, Brugge 20 February 2015 VLIZ SPECIAL PUBLICATION 71 - i - This publication should be quoted as follows: Jan Mees and Jan Seys (Eds). 2015. Book of abstracts – VLIZ Young Marine Scientists’ Day. Brugge, Belgium, 20 February 2015. VLIZ Special Publication 71. Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee – Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ): Oostende, Belgium. xiv + 196 p. Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee Flanders Marine Institute VLIZ – InnovOcean site Wandelaarkaai 7 8400 Oostende, Belgium Tel. +32-(0)59-34 21 30 Fax +32-(0)59-34 21 31 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.vliz.be Photo cover: Sea view from the tallest building (Europe Center) of Ostend: view on the beach, the western dyke, and the RV Simon Stevin entering the port (August 2014) © VLIZ (Leontien De Wulf) Reproduction is authorized, provided that appropriate mention is made of the source. ISSN 1377-0950 - ii - PREFACE This is the ‘Book of Abstracts’ of the 15th edition of the VLIZ Young Marine Scientists’ Day, a one day event that was organised on 20 February, 2015 in VIVES, Brugge. This annual event has become more and more successful over the years. With more than 300 participants and circa 130 scientific contributions, it is fair to say that it is the place to be for Flemish marine researchers and for the end-users of their research. It is an important networking opportunity, where young scientists can meet and interact with their peers, learn from each other, build their personal professional network and establish links for collaborative and interdisciplinary research.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Sedimentation the Sea Floor, Being the Place of Accumulation Of
    t CHAPTER XX Marine Sedimentation INTRODUCTION The sea floor, being the place of accumulation of solid detrital material of inorganic or organic origin, is virtually covered with unconsolidated sediments; therefore, the study of materialsfound on the sea bottom falls largely within the field of sedimentation, and the methods of investigation employed are those used in this branch of geology. Twenhofel (1926) has defined sedimentation as . includhg that portionof the metamorphkcyole from the separation of the particlesfromthe parentrock,no matterwhatits originor constitu- tion,to andincludingtheirconsolidationinto anotherrock. Sedimentation thus involvesa considerationof the sourcesfrom whichthe sedimentsare derived;the methodsof transportationfromthe placesof originto thoseof deposition;the chemicaland other changestakingplace in the sediments from the times of their productionto their ultimateconsolidation;the climaticandotherenvironmentalconditionsprevailingattheplacesof origin, overtheregionsthroughwhichtransportationtakesplace,andin the places of deposition;the structuresdevelopedin connectionwith depositionand consolidation;and the horizontaland verticalvariationsof the sediments. Marine sedimentation is therefore concerned with a wide range of prob- lems, some of which are more or less unique to the sea, while others are of more general character. This discussion will deal with the first group and particular emphasiswill be placed upon the” oceanographic” aspects of marine sediments. The methods of studying the character and com- position of marine deposits are common to all types of sediments and, since readily available sources are cited in the text, will not be described here. The importance of investigations in marine sedimentation is obvious when it is realized that most of the rocks exposed at the surface of the earth are sedimentary deposits laid down under the sea. In order to interpret the past history of the earth from these structures,it is necessary to determinethe character of the materialnow being deposited in different environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Cone: Morphology, Sediments, Age, and Growth Pattern
    Amazon Cone: Morphology, Sediments, Age, and Growth Pattern NARESHKUMAR™ I Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964 ABSTRACT Oceanographic Exploration between Brazilian government agen- cies (REMAC and PETROBRAS) and Lamont-Doherty Geological The morphology, sediment distribution, and growth pattern of Observatory to study the Brazilian continental margin. the Amazon cone are similar to those of other deep-sea fans; its sed- We utilize the geophysical data (3.5- and 12-kHz echograms, iment, at least during the late Quaternary Period, was deposited in seismic reflection profiles, and sonobuoy data) and sediment sam- response to glacial-interglacial cycles, and its age of formation is ples (piston cores) collected at random during the past 20 years to estimated to be middle to late Miocene. describe the morphology, sediments, and structure of the cone, as Sedimentation on the Amazon cone, at least during Quaternary well as to determine a growth pattern and approximate age for the time, has been climatically controlled. During high sea-level stands, cone. terrigenous sediment is trapped on the inner continental shelf, and only pelagic sediment is deposited on the cone. During low sea- MORPHOLOGY level stands, the Amazon River discharges terrigenous sediment into the Amazon Submarine Canyon, from where it is easily trans- The Amazon cone is elongate and extends northward 650 to 700 ported to the cone by gravity-controlled sediment flows. Wisconsin km from the continental shelf to the Demerara Abyssal Plain at sedimentation rates on the cone were in excess of 30 cm/103 yr. depths of 4,600 to 4,850 m (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurassic Pelagic Deposits from Southeastern Tuscany
    12 figures geol. PagesTl5-762 Basle,November 1979 Eclogae Helv. Yol.72/3 in the text Jurassicpelagic deposits from SoutheasternTuscany; aspectsof sedimentationand new biostratigraphicdatat) By Orro KArrN2),Erre Plrecc^n3)and Orro RrNza) ABSTRACT The Jurassic deep-water sediments of the Tuscan palaeogeographic domain were deposited on a part of the Italy-Adriatic continental margin bordering the opening Ligurian ocean to the southeast. The sequences of the Monti di Poggiano, Rapolano and Chianti areas investigated in this paper accumulated in a morphological basin which originated, during Early Sinemurian time, with the tectonic disintegration of a former extensive shallow-water platform (Calcare Massiccio). The oldest sediments dealt with belong to the Chlcare Selcifero Formation of Middle Liassic age. This comprises slightly siliceous, grey lime mudstones and wackestones, locally affected by penecontem- poraneous sliding and slumping, and interbedded coarse gravity-flow deposits with admixtures of lime sand obviously supplied from persistent fringng shallow banks. A relatively high average sedimentation rate suggeststhat the fine-grained slope and basinal deposits contain significant amounts of bank-derived fnes, in addition to the truly pelagic biogenic carbonate (essentially tests of Schizosphaerella), and thus were peri-platform ooze originally. By early Upper Liassic time, the hemipelagic limestones of the Calcare Selcifero gave way to a predominantly marly unit - the Marne a Posidonia. The attendant drastic drop of the sedinentation
    [Show full text]
  • Charles K. Paull
    Charles K. Paull Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute [email protected] 7700 Sandholdt Road Office 831-775-1886 Moss Landing, California 95039-9644 FAX 831-775-1620 Education: 1980-1986 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California; Ph.D. in Oceanography 1976-1978 University of Miami, Miami, Florida; M.S. in Marine Geology and Geophysics 1970-1975 Harvard College, Cambridge, Massachusetts; B.A. cum laude in Geology Professional Activities: 1999 – present, Senior Scientist, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California (Research Chair 2008 – 2012) 1996 –1999, Amos L. Hawley Distinguished Professor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 1987-1998, Assistant (1987-1991), Associate (1991-1993), and Full (1993-1999) Professor, Geology Department and Marine Sciences Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 1986-1993, Assistant (1986-1988) and Associate (1988-1993) Research Scientist, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California 1985-1986, Visiting Scientist, ETH Zurich, Switzerland 1980-1985, Research Assistant, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California 1977-1980 & 1975-1976, Geologist, Resource Assessment Group of the U. S. Geological Survey's Office of Marine Geology, Woods Hole, Massachusetts Research Interests: Determining the frequency, distribution and environmental significance of continental margin pore water seeps is a central theme of my research efforts. In the past I have worked on diverse seeps including those in the floors of coastal lagoons, on continental slopes, at bases of carbonate escarpments, within sinkholes, over the crests of diapirs, and on the continental rise that contain extensive amounts of gas hydrates.
    [Show full text]