DOCSLIB.ORG

Aircraft Classification Numbers (Acns)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aircraft Classification Numbers (Acns) AIRCRAFT LOAD RATINGS (ALR's) Weight Tire Flexible Pavement Subgrades Rigid Pavement Subgrades Max/Min Pressure Max S (kN) k (MPa/m) Aircraft (kN) (MPa) ALR 50 90 130 180 20 40 80 150 A300-B, B2 1353 1.16 10.2 10.2 10.1 10.0 9.6 9.9 9.9 9.7 9.4 840 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.6 --- 7.8 7.6 7.3 7.0 A300-B4-200 1627 1.28 11.0 11.0 10.9 10.9 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.4 1236 9.6 9.6 9.5 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.3 9.0 A300-B4-200 1627 1.16 10.8 10.8 10.6 10.6 10.2 10.4 10.4 10.2 9.9 (Optional Bogie) 1236 9.4 9.4 9.2 9.0 9.3 9.2 9.1 8.8 8.6 A300-B4-600R 1693 1.35 11.2 11.2 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.8 1275 9.8 9.8 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.8 9.7 9.6 9.3 A300-B4-600R 1693 1.21 11.0 11.0 10.9 10.8 10.6 10.7 10.7 10.5 10.3 (Optional Bogie) 1275 9.6 9.6 9.4 9.3 9.5 9.4 9.3 9.1 8.8 A300-C4 1627 1.24 10.9 10.9 10.8 10.7 10.5 10.6 10.6 10.5 10.2 1216 9.4 9.4 9.3 9.1 9.4 9.3 9.2 9.0 8.7 A310-200, 200C 1509 1.46 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.3 10.4 10.4 10.3 10.1 800 7.7 7.2 7.4 7.7 --- 7.6 7.4 7.2 7.0 A310-300 1480 1.19 10.6 10.6 10.5 10.4 10.1 10.3 10.3 10.1 9.9 (Configuration 1) 1108 9.2 9.2 9.0 8.8 9.1 9.0 8.9 8.7 8.3 A310-300 1549 1.48 10.7 10.7 10.6 10.7 10.6 10.6 10.7 10.6 10.4 (Configuration 2) 1118 9.5 8.9 8.9 9.0 9.5 9.2 9.1 9.0 8.7 A310-300 1617 1.29 11.0 11.0 10.9 10.9 10.7 10.7 10.8 10.7 10.5 (Configuration 3) 1118 9.3 9.1 9.0 8.9 9.3 9.1 9.0 8.8 8.5 A310-322 SR, BB 1500 1.45 10.4 10.4 10.3 10.4 10.3 10.4 10.4 10.3 10.1 1064 9.3 8.5 8.6 8.6 9.3 8.9 8.8 8.6 8.3 A310-324 1540 1.24 10.6 10.6 10.5 10.5 10.2 10.4 10.4 10.3 10.0 800 7.6 7.2 7.2 7.6 --- 7.5 7.3 6.9 6.7 A310-325 1608 1.38 10.8 10.8 10.7 10.7 10.6 10.7 10.7 10.6 10.4 1100 9.3 8.8 8.7 8.7 9.3 9.0 8.9 8.7 8.4 A318-100 607 0.89 8.8 8.6 8.6 8.6 --- 8.5 8.7 8.8 8.8 382 7.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 --- 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.7 A319-100 632 0.89 8.9 8.6 8.7 8.6 --- 8.6 8.7 8.9 8.9 (Configuration 1) 382 6.9 6.4 6.5 6.9 --- 6.7 6.7 6.6 6.6 A319-100 690 1.07 9.5 8.9 9.1 9.2 9.4 9.0 9.2 9.4 9.5 (Configuration 2) 382 7.2 6.3 6.6 7.2 --- 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.9 A319-100 744 1.38 10.2 9.0 9.3 9.7 10.0 9.5 9.7 10.0 10.2 (Configuration 3) 382 7.6 6.3 6.9 7.6 --- 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.2 Page 1 Transport Canada, Technical Programs (AARJD), Ottawa, Canada (www.tc.gc.ca) March 2004 AIRCRAFT LOAD RATINGS (ALR's) Weight Tire Flexible Pavement Subgrades Rigid Pavement Subgrades Max/Min Pressure Max S (kN) k (MPa/m) Aircraft (kN) (MPa) ALR 50 90 130 180 20 40 80 150 A320-100 667 1.21 9.7 8.8 9.0 9.3 9.6 9.1 9.3 9.5 9.7 390 7.5 6.5 7.0 7.5 --- 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 A320-200 725 1.03 9.8 9.2 9.3 9.5 9.6 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.8 (Configuration 1) 402 7.3 6.6 6.9 7.3 --- 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.1 A320-200 744 1.14 10.0 9.2 9.4 9.6 9.7 9.4 9.6 9.9 10.0 (Configuration 2) 422 7.6 6.7 7.1 7.6 --- 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 A320-200 759 1.44 10.4 9.1 9.5 9.8 10.2 9.6 9.9 10.2 10.4 (Configuration 3) 441 8.9 6.9 7.4 7.9 8.9 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 A320-200 725 1.22 7.8 7.5 7.4 7.4 --- 7.8 7.7 7.4 7.0 (Optional Bogie) 402 5.5 5.2 5.5 --- --- 5.2 4.9 4.4 --- A320-212 (Optional 764 1.22 8.0 7.8 7.7 7.5 --- 8.0 7.9 7.6 7.3 4-Wheel Bogie) 490 6.1 5.8 5.9 --- --- 6.1 5.8 5.4 5.1 A321-100 769 1.28 10.4 9.4 9.7 10.0 10.2 9.7 10.0 10.2 10.4 (Configuration 1) 461 8.1 7.2 7.6 7.9 --- 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.1 A321-100 818 1.36 10.8 9.6 9.9 10.2 10.5 10.0 10.3 10.5 10.8 (Configuration 2) 461 8.9 7.1 7.6 8.0 8.9 7.8 8.0 8.1 8.2 A321-200 877 1.46 11.1 9.8 10.2 10.5 10.8 10.2 10.5 10.9 11.1 461 9.0 7.1 7.7 8.1 9.0 7.8 8.0 8.1 8.2 A330-200 2137 1.34 11.0 11.0 10.9 10.8 10.9 10.9 10.8 10.7 10.6 (Configuration 1) 1650 10.2 9.7 9.5 9.3 10.2 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.5 A330-200 2264 1.42 11.3 11.3 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.0 11.0 (Configuration 2) 1650 10.3 9.6 9.4 9.3 10.3 9.8 9.7 9.6 9.6 A330-300 2088 1.31 10.9 10.9 10.8 10.7 10.8 10.8 10.7 10.6 10.5 (Configuration 1) 1638 10.2 9.7 9.4 9.2 10.2 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.5 A330-300 2137 1.33 11.0 11.0 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.7 10.6 10.6 (Configuration 2) 1657 10.2 9.7 9.5 9.3 10.2 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.5 A330-300 2264 1.42 11.3 11.3 11.2 11.2 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.1 11.0 (Configuration 3) 1697 10.4 9.8 9.7 9.6 10.4 10.0 9.8 9.8 9.8 A340-200 2559 1.32 11.0 11.0 10.8 10.7 10.8 10.8 10.7 10.6 10.6 (Configuration 1) 1657 9.7 8.7 8.5 8.9 9.7 8.9 8.8 8.7 8.7 A340-200 2706 1.42 11.3 11.3 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.0 11.0 (Configuration 2) 1697 9.9 8.8 8.7 9.1 9.9 9.1 9.0 8.9 9.0 A340-300 2559 1.32 11.0 11.0 10.8 10.7 10.8 10.8 10.7 10.6 10.5 (Configuration 1) 1706 10.0 9.2 8.9 9.1 10.0 9.3 9.1 9.0 9.1 Page 2 Transport Canada, Technical Programs (AARJD), Ottawa, Canada (www.tc.gc.ca) March 2004 AIRCRAFT LOAD RATINGS (ALR's) Weight Tire Flexible Pavement Subgrades Rigid Pavement Subgrades Max/Min Pressure Max S (kN) k (MPa/m) Aircraft (kN) (MPa) ALR 50 90 130 180 20 40 80 150 A340-300 2706 1.42 11.3 11.3 11.2 11.2 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.1 11.0 (Configuration 2) 1765 10.2 9.3 9.2 9.2 10.2 9.6 9.5 9.4 9.4 A340-500, 600 3590 1.42 11.8 11.8 11.6 11.6 11.4 11.6 11.5 11.4 11.4 1750 9.6 7.9 7.9 8.7 9.6 8.4 8.3 8.2 8.3 A380-800 5514 1.47 12.2 12.2 11.5 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.7 11.3 11.1 (6 Wheel Main Gear) 2758 9.5 7.5 7.6 8.5 9.5 8.6 8.2 7.9 8.0 A380-800 5514 1.47 11.3 11.3 11.2 11.2 11.0 11.3 11.2 11.1 11.1 (4 Wheel Wing Gear) 2758 9.5 7.5 7.7 8.5 9.5 8.2 8.1 8.0 8.0 Antonov AN- 24 207 0.42 4.6 4.6 --- --- --- 4.5 4.3 --- --- 130 2.7 2.7 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Antonov AN-124-100 3844 1.03 12.0 12.0 11.4 10.9 9.3 11.6 11.0 10.1 9.3 2000 8.2 8.2 7.1 7.4 --- 7.9 7.1 6.4 6.1 Antonov AN-225 5884 1.13 12.9 12.9 12.4 12.0 11.5 12.3 11.7 11.0 10.2 4500 11.4 11.4 10.9 10.5 9.4 10.8 10.1 9.3 8.7 ATR 42 182 0.72 4.9 4.9 4.9 --- --- 4.8 4.7 4.6 --- (Aerospatiale) 110 3.5 3.5 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ATR 72 211 0.79 5.6 5.5 5.6 --- --- 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.4 (Aerospatiale) 125 3.9 3.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Aurora (CP-140) 600 1.31 9.9 8.9 9.2 9.6 9.9 9.1 9.4 9.7 9.9 (P-3 Orion) 275 6.9 6.0 6.5 6.9 --- 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.3 B-52 (Bomber) 2170 1.65 13.3 12.0 12.2 12.4 12.5 12.7 12.8 13.1 13.3 1500 11.5 10.2 10.4 10.7 10.9 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 B1-B Bomber 2123 1.65 12.4 12.2 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 (Rockwell) 1400 10.5 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.5 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.1 B707-120, 120B 1150 1.17 9.4 9.4 9.3 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.1 8.9 8.5 700 7.2 6.8 6.9 7.2 --- 7.0 6.7 6.4 6.2 B707-320, 320B, 1484 1.24 10.7 10.7 10.6 10.6 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.3 10.0 320C, 420 800 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.6 --- 7.7 7.4 7.1 6.9 B717-100, 200, 300 543 1.10 9.4 8.7 8.9 9.2 9.4 8.7 9.0 9.2 9.4 310 7.0 6.4 6.8 7.0 --- 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.8 B720, 720B 1045 1.01 9.1 9.1 8.9 8.5 --- 8.8 8.6 8.3 7.9 700 7.0 7.0 6.8 7.0 --- 6.9 6.6 6.2 6.0 B727-100, 100C 756 1.14 10.3 9.5 9.7 9.9 10.1 9.6 9.9 10.1 10.3 450 7.9 7.2 7.5 7.7 --- 7.6 7.8 7.9 7.9 Page 3 Transport Canada, Technical Programs (AARJD), Ottawa, Canada (www.tc.gc.ca) March 2004 AIRCRAFT LOAD RATINGS (ALR's) Weight Tire Flexible Pavement Subgrades Rigid Pavement Subgrades Max/Min Pressure Max S (kN) k (MPa/m) Aircraft (kN) (MPa) ALR 50 90 130 180 20 40 80 150 B727-200 770 1.15 10.4 9.6 9.8 10.0 10.2 9.7 9.9 10.2 10.4 450 7.9 7.2 7.5 7.7 --- 7.6 7.8 7.9 7.9 B727-200 934 1.19 11.3 10.4 10.6 10.8 11.0 10.4 10.7 11.0 11.3 (Advanced) 450 8.0 7.2 7.6 7.8 --- 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 B727-200F 907 1.15 11.1 10.2 10.4 10.7 10.9 10.3 10.6 10.9 11.1 (Advanced) 450 7.9 7.2 7.5 7.7 --- 7.6 7.8 7.9 7.9 B737-100 445 1.02 7.9 7.4 7.6 7.8 --- 7.6 7.8 7.9 7.9 260 5.7 5.4 5.7 --- --- 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.5 B737-200, 200C, 572 1.26 9.4 8.4 8.7 9.0 9.3 8.7 9.0 9.2 9.4 Advanced 300 7.0 6.0 6.5 7.0 --- 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 B737-300 623 1.40 9.9 8.7 9.1 9.4 9.8 9.1 9.4 9.7 9.9 325 7.4 6.2 6.9 7.4 --- 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.9 B737-400 670 1.28 10.1 9.1 9.4 9.7 10.0 9.4 9.6 9.9 10.1 350 7.4 6.4 7.0 7.4 --- 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.1 B737-500 596 1.34 9.6 8.5 8.9 9.3 9.6 8.9 9.2 9.4 9.6 320 7.3 6.1 6.7 7.3 --- 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.8 B737-600 645 1.30 9.7 8.7 9.0 9.3 9.6 9.1 9.3 9.6 9.7 357 7.5 6.3 6.9 7.5 --- 6.8 6.9 7.0 7.1 B737-700 690 1.39 10.1 9.0 9.3 9.6 10.0 9.4 9.7 9.9 10.1 370 7.6 6.5 7.1 7.6 --- 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 B737-800 777 1.47 10.7 9.4 9.8 10.1 10.5 9.9 10.2 10.5 10.7 406 8.9 6.7 7.4 7.8 8.9 7.4 7.6 7.7 7.8 B737-900 777 1.47 10.7 9.4 9.8 10.1 10.5 9.9 10.2 10.5 10.7 420 8.0 6.9 7.5 7.9 --- 7.5 7.7 7.8 8.0 B737-BBJ 763 1.47 10.6 9.3 9.7 10.1 10.5 9.8 10.1 10.4 10.6 421 8.0 6.9 7.5 7.9 --- 7.5 7.7 7.9 8.0 B747-100, 100B, 3350 1.55 10.7 10.5 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.7 10.7 10.6 10.4 100SF 1700 9.0 7.0 7.3 8.0 9.0 7.7 7.5 7.3 7.2 B747-100SR 2690 1.04 9.7 9.7 9.4 8.9 9.4 9.5 9.3 9.0 8.7 1600 7.4 6.9 6.4 7.4 --- 7.1 6.8 6.5 6.3 B747-200B, 200C, 3720 1.38 11.2 11.2 11.0 11.0 10.8 11.0 11.0 11.0 10.8 200F, 200M 1750 7.9 7.2 7.3 7.9 --- 7.7 7.5 7.3 7.2 B747-300, 300M 3720 1.31 11.2 11.2 11.0 11.0 10.7 11.0 11.0 10.9 10.7 300SR 1760 7.9 7.2 7.2 7.9 --- 7.7 7.5 7.2 7.1 Page 4 Transport Canada, Technical Programs (AARJD), Ottawa, Canada (www.tc.gc.ca) March 2004 AIRCRAFT LOAD RATINGS (ALR's) Weight Tire Flexible Pavement Subgrades Rigid Pavement Subgrades Max/Min Pressure Max S (kN) k (MPa/m) Aircraft (kN) (MPa) ALR 50 90 130 180 20 40 80 150 B747-400, 400F, 3905 1.38 11.4 11.4 11.3 11.2 11.0 11.3 11.3 11.2 11.0 400M 1800 8.9 7.3 7.3 8.0 8.9 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.3 B747-400D 2729 1.04 9.8 9.8 9.5 9.0 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.1 8.7 (Domestic) 1782 7.6 7.5 7.1 7.6 --- 7.6 7.3 7.0 6.8 B747-SP 3127 1.26 10.5 10.5 10.3 10.1 10.0 10.4 10.3 10.2 9.9 1500 7.5 6.6 6.6 7.5 --- 7.1 6.8 6.5 6.4 B757-200 Series 1134 1.24 9.6 9.6 9.4 9.2 9.3 9.5 9.5 9.3 9.0 570 6.9 6.1 6.3 6.9 --- 6.5 6.2 5.8 5.6 B757-300 1200 1.24 9.9 9.9 9.7 9.5 9.4 9.8 9.8 9.6 9.3 640 7.2 6.6 6.6 7.2 --- 7.0 6.7 6.4 6.1 B767-200 1410 1.31 9.8 9.8 9.5 9.3 9.8 9.8 9.7 9.6 9.3 800 7.6 6.7 6.8 7.6 --- 7.3 7.0 6.8 6.7 B767-200 ER 1726 1.31 10.8 10.8 10.6 10.5 10.3 10.7 10.7 10.6 10.3 830 7.7 6.9 6.9 7.7 --- 7.4 7.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 89/Tuesday, May 8, 2018/Proposed
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 8, 2018 / Proposed Rules 20743 of this AD following Bombardier Learjet 60 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION information on the availability of this SB 60–27–39 Recommended, Basic Issue, material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. dated September 11, 2017. Federal Aviation Administration Examining the AD Docket (i) No Reporting Requirement 14 CFR Part 39 You may examine the AD docket on Although Bombardier Learjet 28/29 SB 28/ the internet at http:// 29–27–31 Recommended, dated September [Docket No. FAA–2018–0396; Product www.regulations.gov by searching for 11, 2017; Bombardier Learjet 31 SB 31–27– Identifier 2017–NM–156–AD] and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– 35 Recommended, dated September 11, 2017; RIN 2120–AA64 0396; or in person at the Docket Bombardier Learjet 35/36 SB 35/36 -27–50 Management Facility between 9 a.m. Recommended, dated September 11, 2017; Airworthiness Directives; Airbus and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, Bombardier Learjet 55 SB 55–27–41 Airplanes except Federal holidays. The AD docket Recommended, dated September 11, 2017; contains this NPRM, the regulatory and Bombardier Learjet 60 SB 60–27–39 AGENCY: Federal Aviation evaluation, any comments received, and Recommended, Revision 1, dated January 15, Administration (FAA), DOT. other information. The street address for 2018, all specify to submit a compliance ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking the Docket Operations office (telephone response form to the manufacturer per (NPRM). 800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES paragraph 3.E., this AD does not require that section.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 89/Tuesday, May 8, 2018/Proposed
    20740 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 8, 2018 / Proposed Rules (c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION www.regulations.gov by searching for Necessity of Information) because in the and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– course of investigations into potential Federal Aviation Administration 0327; or in person at Docket Operations violations of federal law, the accuracy of between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday information obtained or introduced 14 CFR Part 39 through Friday, except Federal holidays. occasionally may be unclear, or the The AD docket contains this NPRM, the information may not be strictly relevant or [Docket No. FAA–2018–0327; Product Identifier 2018–CE–001–AD] regulatory evaluation, any comments necessary to a specific investigation. In the received, and other information. The interests of effective law enforcement, it is RIN 2120–AA64 street address for Docket Operations appropriate to retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of unlawful Airworthiness Directives; Learjet, Inc. (phone: 800–647–5527) is listed above. activity. Airplanes Comments will be available in the AD (d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of docket shortly after receipt. Information from Individuals) because AGENCY: Federal Aviation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara requiring that information be collected from Administration (FAA), DOT. Shawn, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita the subject of an investigation would alert the ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking ACO Branch, 1801 Airport Road, Room subject to the nature or existence of the (NPRM). 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: investigation, thereby interfering with that (316) 946–4141; fax: (316) 946–4107; investigation and related law enforcement SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new email: [email protected] or Wichita- activities.
    [Show full text]
  • SSK 0980 Rev 1.Fm
    2b LEARJET 23/24/25, 28/29, 35/36 APPROVEDWHITEIN RT 0980 Revision Transmittal Sheet This page transmits Revision 1 to SSK 0980, “Replacement of Air Conditioning Evaporator Assembly”. Rework: No rework is required for aircraft which have complied with previous issues of this document. Summary: This revision adds clamp part number MS21919WDG20 as an alternate to MS21919DG20, removes the 7600122-3 evaporator assembly from the 2499002-2, -3, -4, and -010 kits, and adds the AN919-15D reducer to the 2499002-2 and -010 kits. The kit prices are updated. NOTE: Change bars are placed in the left margin of pages where significant changes are located. This revision incorporates the latest document format for Learjet service instructions. The general arrangement of this document may change from the previous issue. Description of Changes In the Planning Information section: Changed the Material Required information section as follows: Updated the 2499002-1 thru -010 kit pricing. In the Material Information section: Changed the 2499002-1 and -009 kit information as follows: Removed Model 25 aircraft serials that were never built, and removed reference to Model 25F. Changed the 2499002-1, -2, -3, -4, -009, and -010 kit information as follows: Added alternate part number clamp. Changed the 2499002-2, -3, -4, and -010 kit information as follows: Moved the 7600122-3 evaporator assembly to the “Other materials/parts necessary” table. Changed the 2499002-2 and -010 kit information as follows: Added the AN919-15D reducer. Filing Instructions: This is a COMPLETE revision. Remove and discard all pages of the prior issue and replace them with pages of Revision 1.
    [Show full text]
  • [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/08/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-09600, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2018-0327; Product Identifier 2018-CE-001-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Learjet, Inc. Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Learjet, Inc. Models 28, 29, 31, 31A, 35, 35A, 36, 36A, 55, 55B, 55C, and 60 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by fatigue cracks initiating in the flap support structure due to repetitive flap loads, which has caused flap nose roller support bracket failure. This proposed AD would require replacement of the flap nose roller fitting, nose roller support bracket, and adjacent rib support structure with more robust components. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 202-493-2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020.1 1 Date: 7 August 2020 RVSM MONITORING GROUPS AND
    RVSM MONITORING GROUPS AND MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS AS OF: 7 August 2020 Version: 2020.1 1. UPDATE OF MONITORING REQUIREMENTS TABLE AND WEBSITE. As significant data is obtained, monitoring requirements for specific aircraft types may change. When Table 1 below, is updated, a letter will be distributed by the Regional Monitoring Agencies (RMAs) to the States concerned. The updated table will be posted on the RMA website being maintained by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The secure website address is: http://portal.icao.int 2. INITIAL MONITORING. All operators that operate or intend to operate in airspace where RVSM is applied are required to participate in the RVSM monitoring program. Table 1 establishes requirements for initial monitoring associated with the RVSM approval process. In their application to the appropriate State authority for RVSM approval, operators must show a plan for meeting the applicable initial monitoring requirements. 3. AIRCRAFT STATUS FOR MONITORING. Aircraft engineering work that is required for the aircraft to receive RVSM airworthiness approval must be completed prior to the aircraft being monitored. Any exception to this rule will be coordinated with the State authority. 4. APPLICABILITY OF MONITORING FROM OTHER REGIONS. Monitoring data obtained in conjunction with RVSM monitoring programs from other regions can be used to meet regional monitoring requirements. The RMAs, which are responsible for administering the monitoring program, have access to monitoring data from other regions and will coordinate with States and operators to inform them on the status of individual operator monitoring requirements. 5. MONITORING PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF RVSM OPERATIONAL APPROVAL IS NOT A REQUIREMENT.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Rounds in a King Air Saos–Maximum Slickness
    FOR THE PILOTS OF OWNER-FLOWN, CABIN-CLASS AIRCRAFT APRIL 2016 $3.95 US VOLUME 20 NUMBER 4 Making The Rounds In A King Air SaOS–Maximum Slickness Push And Hold–To Live NBAA Focus APRIL 2016 TWIN & TURBINE • 1 The Worldwide General Aviation & Business Aviation Markets owner/operators and chief pilots of these aircraft ALL RECEIVE Twin &Turbine every month TOTAL MARKET COVERAGE JETS 1 DIAMOND I 40 HAWKER 1000A 34 LEARJET 36A 53 DIAMOND IA 9 HAWKER 125-1A 24 LEARJET 40 CHIEF PILOTS & OWNERS 3 DORNIER ENVOY 3 2 HAWKER 125-1AS 219 LEARJET 45 Aircraft Count 282 ECLIPSE EA500 1 HAWKER 125-3A/RA 193 LEARJET 45XR 47 EMBRAER LEGACY 600 2 HAWKER 125-400A 115 LEARJET 55 4 AIRBUS ACJ319 8 EMBRAER LEGACY 650 29 HAWKER 125-400AS 5 LEARJET 55B 32 ASTRA 1125 158 EMBRAER PHENOM 100 1 HAWKER 125-400B 12 LEARJET 55C 31 ASTRA 1125SP House Ad 82 EMBRAER PHENOM 300 4 HAWKER 125-600A 293 LEARJET 60 63 ASTRA 1125SPX 123 FALCON 10 11 HAWKER 125-600AS 130 PREMIER I 51 BEECHJET 400 28 FALCON 100 113 HAWKER 125-700A 16 SABRELINER 40 Full Page 275 BEECHJET 400A 25 FALCON 200 50 HAWKER 4000 13 SABRELINER 40A 58 BOEING BBJ 4/C Ad 176 FALCON 2000 187 HAWKER 400XP 7 SABRELINER 40EL 391 CHALLENGER 300 21 FALCON 2000EX 21 HAWKER 750 3 SABRELINER 40R 65 CHALLENGER 600 81 FALCON 20C 223 HAWKER 800A 24 SABRELINER 60 58 CHALLENGER 601-1A 17 FALCON 20C-5 2 HAWKER 800B 1 SABRELINER 60A 133 CHALLENGER 601-3A 26 FALCON 20D 335 HAWKER 800XP 2 SABRELINER 60AELXM 56 CHALLENGER 601-3R 3 FALCON 20D-5 14 HAWKER 800XPI 12 SABRELINER 60ELXM 279 CHALLENGER 604 7 FALCON 20E 67 HAWKER 850XP
    [Show full text]
  • How to Gain with Your Plane NASCAR Great Enhances His Conquest II Panel
    FOR THE PILOTS OF OWNER-FLOWN, CABIN-CLASS AIRCRAFT FEBRUARY 2015 $3.95 US VOLUME 19 NUMBER 2 How To Gain With Your Plane NASCAR Great Enhances His Conquest II Panel Flying and Servicing The MU-2 Cold Weather Operating Tips Is The Vmc Demo A Circus Trick? The Worldwide General Aviation & Business Aviation Markets owner/operators and chief pilots of these aircraft ALL RECEIVE Twin &Turbine every month Do you want your marketing message to reach these key decision makers? It will when you advertise in Twin & Turbine TOTAL MARKET COVERAGE JETS 1 DIAMOND I 40 HAWKER 1000A 34 LEARJET 36A 303 CONQUEST I 5 MERLIN IV TWIN PISTON 8 2 ROCKWELL 520 53 DIAMOND IA 9 HAWKER 125-1A 24 LEARJET 40 354 CONQUEST II 13 MERLIN IV-A COMMANDER CHIEF PILOTS & OWNERS 3 DORNIER ENVOY 3 2 HAWKER 125-1AS 219 LEARJET 45 49 KING AIR 100 13 MERLIN IV-C OWNERS 15 ROCKWELL 560 Aircraft Count 282 ECLIPSE EA500 1 HAWKER 125-3A/RA 193 LEARJET 45XR 502 KING AIR 200 105 MITSUBISHI MARQUISE Aircraft Count COMMANDER 47 EMBRAER LEGACY 600 2 HAWKER 125-400A 115 LEARJET 55 12 KING AIR 200C 1 MITSUBISHI MU-2D 21 ROCKWELL 560A 4 AIRBUS ACJ319 9 ADAM A500 8 EMBRAER LEGACY 650 29 HAWKER 125-400AS 5 LEARJET 55B 12 KING AIR 200T 29 MITSUBISHI MU-2F COMMANDER 32 ASTRA 1125 1550 BARON 58 158 EMBRAER PHENOM 100 1 HAWKER 125-400B 12 LEARJET 55C House Ad 203 KING AIR 300 1 MITSUBISHI MU-2G 17 ROCKWELL 560E 31 ASTRA 1125SP 479 BARON 58P COMMANDER 82 EMBRAER PHENOM 300 4 HAWKER 125-600A 293 LEARJET 60 3 KING AIR 300LW 22 MITSUBISHI MU-2J 63 ASTRA 1125SPX 137 BARON 58TC 11 ROCKWELL 560F 123
    [Show full text]
  • ACN's) AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBERS (ACN's
    Transport Canada Technical Evaluation Engineering Aircraft Classification Numbers (ACN's) AIRCRAFT CLASSIFICATION NUMBERS (ACN's) Flexibile Pavement Subgrades Rigid Pavement Subgrades ST CBR [%] k [MPa/m] Weight Load on High Medium Low V.Low High Medium Low V.Low SB one main Tire Max/Min A B C D A B C D Aircraft gear Pressure [cm] [kN] [%] [MPa] 15 10 6 3 150 80 40 20 A300B, B2 1353 46.5 1.16 39 44 54 69 35 43 51 58 89 840 21 23 27 36 19 22 26 31 140 A300B4-200 1627 46.5 1.28 50 57 69 86 46 56 66 75 89 1236 35 38 46 60 32 38 45 51 140 A300B4-200 1627 1.16 47 52 64 82 41 49 59 68 (Optional Bogie) 1236 33 36 42 56 28 33 40 47 A300B4-600R 1693 1.35 54 61 74 92 51 61 71 80 1275 37 41 49 64 34 41 48 55 A300B4-600R 1693 1.21 50 56 69 88 44 54 64 74 (Optional Bogie) 1275 35 38 45 60 30 36 43 50 A300C4 1627 1.24 48 55 67 85 44 53 63 72 1216 33 36 43 57 30 35 42 48 A310-200, 200C 1509 1.46 45 50 61 77 43 51 59 67 800 20 21 24 32 19 21 25 29 A310-300 1480 1.19 44 50 61 77 40 48 57 65 1108 30 33 39 52 27 32 38 44 A310-300 1549 1.48 48 54 65 82 46 55 64 72 1118 31 34 40 53 30 35 41 47 A310-300 1617 1.29 50 57 69 86 47 56 66 75 1118 31 34 40 53 28 33 39 45 A310-322 SR, BB 1500 1.45 44 49 60 77 42 50 59 67 1064 29 31 36 48 27 31 37 42 A310-324 1540 1.24 44 49 60 77 41 50 59 67 800 19 20 23 31 18 20 24 28 A310-325 1608 1.38 48 54 66 84 46 55 64 73 1100 30 32 38 50 27 32 38 44 A318-100 607 0.89 29 31 35 41 31 34 36 38 382 17 18 20 23 18 19 21 22 A319-100 632 0.89 30 32 36 42 31 34 37 39 382 17 18 19 23 17 19 20 22 A319-100 690 1.07 35 36 40 46 37 40
    [Show full text]
  • Oct 1988/Learjet
    PILOT REPORT nflight Report: Learjet 55C I The third-iteration, largest Learjet claims unsurpassed runway performance among its mid-size competitors. By FRED GEORGE October 1988 Document # 2412, 6 pages For all of our readers who have come to think of a Lear- Another interesting change is the addition of round jet as one of the most challenging-to-fly aircraft in pro- washer-head machine screws that have replaced every duction, the longhorn Learjet 55C is about to break the other or every third flush screw fastener in the top of the stereotype. Its handling is docile and its manners are wing’s polished metal leading edge cuff. An engineer predictable. It rumbles and buffets clear warnings when explained that during pre-certification development, the flown too slowly. The aircraft is truly controllable aircraft flew better with yarn tufts taped to the wing throughout the flight envelope, right down through a full than with a clean wing. The firm’s designers found that aerodynamic stall. There is more good news: By the the tufts produced a small degree of boundary layer time you read this article, the Learjet 55C should be energizing (BLE) turbulence, delaying the separation of certificated. the airflow over the top of the wing. The prime reason for the aircraft’s improved manners Aerodynamics is still an art to some engineers. Learjet is the addition of the much ballyhooed and highly dis- used extensive trial and error testing to find the right tinctive nine-feet-plus long, “delta-fins,” which replace pattern of exposed screws to produce the same benefi- the single, ventral tailfin on the Learjet 55B.
    [Show full text]
  • Textron Aviation Launches Next Generation of King Air Family
    PUBLICATIONS Vol.49 | No.9 $9.00 SEPTEMBER 2020 | ainonline.com « From a glimpse at Aerion Supersonic’s AS3 airliner (pictured in contrast to the AS2 business jet) to NASA’s and Lockheed Martin’s research on low booms and Virgin Galactic’s ambitions to proceed with a Mach 3 jet, the field of supersonic research is fast growing. Meanwhile, regulators hope to keep up with the advances. (See report on Pages 26-36 and 44.) Finances Textron Aviation posts Textron Aviation launches next quarterly loss page 12 OEMs generation of King Air family Bombardier orders, shipments drop page 14 by Chad Trautvetter Textron Aviation announced the King Opinion Air 360/360ER, an upgrade of the Model How Covid is affecting 350/350ER that includes autothrottles, digital pressurization system, and a rede- flying safety page 16 signed cabin. The new turboprop twin models—priced at $7.9 million and $8.795 Air Transport million, respectively—are currently in production, with customer deliveries More rate cuts at Boeing expected to begin in the fourth quarter. page 38 The Innovative Solutions & Support (IS&S) ThrustSense autothrottles on the King Air 360/360ER—which reduce pilot Read Our SPECIAL REPORT workload by automatically managing engine power from the takeoff roll through the climb, cruise, descent, go-around, and Product Support landing phases of flight—are also being made available as a retrofit for 300-series AIN readers rate the support they King Airs with Collins Pro Line Fusion avi- Textron Aviation’s upgraded King Air 360/360ER features a completely redesigned cabin with received in the last 12 months for flight onics, Textron Aviation said.
    [Show full text]
  • Aip Supplement 049/2018 United Kingdom
    AIP SUPPLEMENT 049/2018 UNITED KINGDOM Date Of Publication 27 Sep 2018 UK Aeronautical Information Services Notes NATS Swanwick (a) All times are UTC. Room 3115 (b) References are to the UK AIP. Sopwith Way (c) Information, where applicable, Southampton SO31 7AY [email protected] should also be used to amend http://www.ais.org.uk appropriate charts. 07469-441832 (Content - DfT/Aviation Policy Division) 0191-203 2329 (Distribution - Communisis UK) LONDON HEATHROW, LONDON GATWICK AND LONDON STANSTED AIRPORTS NOISE RESTRICTIONS NOTICE (NO.2) 2018 (Published on behalf of the Department for Transport) Whereas: a) By virtue of the Civil Aviation (Designation of Aerodromes) Order 1981(a) Heathrow Airport - London, Gatwick Airport - London and Stansted Airport - London (‘the London Airports’) are designated aerodromes for the purposes of Section 78 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 (‘the Act’)(b); b) Pursuant to the powers set out in section 78 of the Act, the Secretary of State considers it appropriate, for the purpose of avoiding, limiting or mitigating the effect of noise and vibration connected with the taking-off or landing of aircraft at the London Airports, to prohibit aircraft of specified descriptions from taking off or landing and to limit the number of occasions on which other aircraft may take off or land at those aerodromes during periods specified in this Notice throughout the period specified as the winter season 2018-2019 in this Notice; c) For the purposes of Section 78(4)(a) of the Act, the circumstances under which a particular occasion or series of occasions on which aircraft take off or land at the London Airports will be disregarded for the purposes of this Notice are specified in paragraph 11 of this Notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated List of Noisy Aircraft Types
    List of Noisy Aircraft Types The following list addresses the requirement of Proposed Town Code §75- 38 A.(4)(a) for the Airport Director to maintain on the Town website a current list of “noisy aircraft” defined to be “any airplane or rotorcraft for which there is a published Effective Perceived Noise in Decibels (EPNdB) approach (AP) level of 91.0 or greater.” 1 The list is presented in terms of International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) aircraft type codes and an accompanying commonplace aircraft type description. Commonplace Aircraft Description ICAO Aircraft Note: Published data for shaded aircraft types include ranges of noise levels that extend across the 91.0 EPNdB threshold. These ranges result from multiple published noise levels for varying aircraft configurations (e.g., Type differing powerplants, maximum operating weights, etc.). For these types, aircraft owners must provide the Code Airport Director with noise level information from the individual aircraft’s flight manual, if the owner believes the aircraft in question should not be classified as noisy. A109 Agusta A-109 AW119 Agusta AW119 MKII A124 Antonov An-124 A139 Agusta AB-139 A189 AgustaWestland AW189 A306 Airbus A300B4-600/A300C4-600 A30B Airbus A300B2/A300B4-100/A300B4-200 A310 Airbus A310-200/A310-300 A318 Airbus A318-100 A319 Airbus A319-100 A320 Airbus A320-100/A320-200/A320-200neo A321 Airbus A321-100/A321-200/A321-200neo A332 Airbus A330-200 A333 Airbus A330-300 A342 Airbus A340-200 A343 Airbus A340-300 A345 Airbus A340-500 A346 Airbus A340-600 A359 Airbus A350-900 A388 Airbus A380-800 A3ST Airbus A300-600ST Beluga A400 Airbus A400M A748 BAe HS748 AN26 Antonov An-26 AN72 Antonov An-72, An-74 Updated September 30, 2015 List of Noisy Aircraft Types Page 2 Commonplace Aircraft Description ICAO Aircraft Note: Published data for shaded aircraft types include ranges of noise levels that extend across the 91.0 EPNdB threshold.
    [Show full text]