Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan Handbook MPUMALANGA BIODIVERSITY SECTOR PLAN HANDBOOK MPUMALANGA BIODIVERSITY SECTOR PLAN HANDBOOK ERS IV R S M E T S Y S O C E E L I T P E R D R I B Y L F R E T P T L A U N B T H S I F G RO L F MAMMA 2014 BOTSWANA NAMIBIA Ehlanzeni MBOMBELA Nkangala MAFIKENG MPUMALANGA North West Gert Sibande ZIMBABWE BOTSWANA Limpopo MOZAMBIQUE POLOKWANE Free StateNAMIBIA Ehlanzeni KIMBERLEY MBOMBELA Nkangala MAFIKENG PRETORIA KwaZulu-NatalJOHANNESBURG Mpumalanga Gauteng BLOEMFONTEIN Gert Sibande SWAZILAND North West LESOTHO PIETERMARITZBURG Free State KIMBERLEY KwaZulu-Natal Northern Cape BLOEMFONTEIN LESOTHO PIETERMARITZBURG Northern Cape SOUTH AFRICA Eastern Cape BHISHO Eastern Cape Western Cape CAPE TOWN BHISHO ISBN: 978-0-620-61137-4 Western Cape This handbook is published by the Mpumalanga Provincial Government, in Nelspruit, 2014. It may be freely copied, reproduced quoted and disseminated in any form, especially for educational and CAPE TOWN scientific purposes, provided the source is properly cited in each and all instances. The Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency welcomes comment and feedback on the handbook, in particular the identification of erros and omissions. Provision of new information that should be incorporated into any revised edition of the Biodiversity Plan or this handbook would be particularly appreciated. For this or any other correspondence please contact: MPUMALANGA TOURISM AND PARKS AGENCY SCIENTIFIC SERVICES TEL: 013 759 5300 Other MBSP Products MBSP wallmap MBSP web map http://conservation3.arcgisonline.com/Apps/MBSP/ MBSP Android phone app (Mpumalanga Biodiversity Plan in Play Store) MPUMALANGA BIODIVERSITY SECTOR PLAN HANDBOOK T N A L P E L I T P E R D R I B Y L F R E T T U B H IS F G FRO AL M A M M Suggested Reference: MTPA. 2014. Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan Handbook. Compiled by Lötter M.C., Cadman, M.J. and Lechmere-Oertel R.G. Mpumalanga Tourism & Parks Agency, Mbombela (Nelspruit). Lead Contributors: Mervyn Lötter - Mpumalanga Tourism & Parks Agency Mandy Cadman Richard Lechmere-Oertel dardlea Department: Agriculture, Rural Development, Land and Environmental Affairs MPUMALANGA PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT iii MPUMALANGA BIODIVERSITY SECTOR PLAN HANDBOOK Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................................iv List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................vii List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................viii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................ix Foreword ...........................................................................................................................................................x Overview ........................................................................................................................................................xii 1 Introduction to the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan ..................................1 1.1 Why Does Mpumalanga Need a Biodiversity Sector Plan? ..................................................................... 2 1.2 The Purpose of a Biodiversity Sector Plan .............................................................................................. 4 1.3 Scope, Objectives and Uses ................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.1 Scope of the MBSP ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.2 Objectives of the MBSP ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3.3 Relationship between the MBSP and the MBCP ........................................................................... 7 1.3.4 Intended users of the MBSP ......................................................................................................... 7 1.3.5 What the MBSP can be used for ................................................................................................... 8 1.4 The Legislative and Policy Framework for Implementation ..................................................................... 9 1.4.1 National legislation and policy ...................................................................................................... 9 1.4.2 Alignment with national biodiversity planning tools .................................................................... 11 1.4.3 The policy context for integrating the MBSP into spatial planning at the local level ..................... 11 2 Biodiversity Profile of Mpumalanga ............................................................................... 13 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Terrestrial Ecosystems .......................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.1 Biomes ....................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 Vegetation types ......................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Threatened ecosystems and endemic vegetation types ............................................................... 17 2.3 Freshwater Ecosystems ......................................................................................................................... 19 2.3.1 Wetlands .................................................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Other Special Habitats and Ecosystems ................................................................................................ 21 2.4.1 Centres of endemism.................................................................................................................. 21 2.4.2 Other features of special biodiversity importance ....................................................................... 22 2.5 Species of Special Concern .................................................................................................................. 22 2.5.1 Medicinal plants: ........................................................................................................................ 24 2.6 Patterns of Land-use and Other Drivers of Habitat Change .................................................................. 25 2.6.1 Land-use pressures and habitat change ....................................................................................... 25 2.6.2 Climate change as a driver of habitat change .............................................................................. 26 2.6.3 Recorded and anticipated shifts in climate in Mpumalanga ........................................................ 27 2.6.4 Habitat fragmentation and vulnerability to climate change ......................................................... 27 iv MPUMALANGA BIODIVERSITY SECTOR PLAN HANDBOOK 3 Spatial Assessment and Map Products ..................................................................... 29 3.1 Developing Maps of Critical Biodiversity Areas .................................................................................... 30 3.1.1 Description of the map categories used ...................................................................................... 31 3.1.2 Map of terrestrial critical biodiversity areas ................................................................................. 31 3.1.3 Map of freshwater critical biodiversity areas................................................................................ 36 3.1.4 Extent of land incorporated in CBAs, ESAs and other map categories .......................................... 36 3.2 Technical Advances Made in the Development of the CBA Maps ....................................................... 36 3.2.1 Planning units ............................................................................................................................. 36 3.2.2 Land cover ................................................................................................................................. 38 3.2.3 Protected areas ........................................................................................................................... 38 3.2.4 An improved network of ecological corridors and inclusion of features important for climate change resilience............................................................................................................ 38 3.2.5 More recent and better quality data ........................................................................................... 39 3.3 Data Layers Used ................................................................................................................................. 41 3.3.1 Terrestrial biodiversity data layers ............................................................................................... 44 3.3.2 Freshwater biodiversity data layers .............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic Sedimentary Sequence Stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton
    Marine and Petroleum Geology 33 (2012) 92e116 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine and Petroleum Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpetgeo Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic sedimentary sequence stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton Adam J. Bumby a,*, Patrick G. Eriksson a, Octavian Catuneanu b, David R. Nelson c, Martin J. Rigby a,1 a Department of Geology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa b Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Canada c SIMS Laboratory, School of Natural Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia article info abstract Article history: The Kaapvaal Craton hosts a number of Precambrian sedimentary successions which were deposited Received 31 August 2010 between 3105 Ma (Dominion Group) and 1700 Ma (Waterberg Group) Although younger Precambrian Received in revised form sedimentary sequences outcrop within southern Africa, they are restricted either to the margins of the 27 September 2011 Kaapvaal Craton, or are underlain by orogenic belts off the edge of the craton. The basins considered in Accepted 30 September 2011 this work are those which host the Witwatersrand and Pongola, Ventersdorp, Transvaal and Waterberg Available online 8 October 2011 strata. Many of these basins can be considered to have formed as a response to reactivation along lineaments, which had initially formed by accretion processes during the amalgamation of the craton Keywords: Kaapvaal during the Mid-Archaean. Faulting along these lineaments controlled sedimentation either directly by Witwatersrand controlling the basin margins, or indirectly by controlling the sediment source areas. Other basins are Ventersdorp likely to be more controlled by thermal affects associated with mantle plumes.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Schools Act: National Norms
    Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyright Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 w ~ , ," , 'Pt . ... ,"" ... " ..., ".' 'G ~~YI PER A,ia'Dt.Ji::e o " ' ; ~S"01SCHOOL . ~18 ; . ,; -- " ' . DIS~ICT ~ft i -: aWii1l..E " : ~ ~' ~F SCHOOL.'- ~: , .',,'.: ..tu\M: =; : ,~ ~ .. f:'- • , ' :Nl!MBERS. :;'~krrl'-"'·" ~'~ . ~'~:--r:'"-" _ 0( '~.,L.. · ·JI' .·1'!,.. .. ~. ALlQCATtOH :::'~ _ ~~" ~· ~ .s~y:, 4 1 . '" ~"oER . o·C"~;:}~~;t~ _ ~-- ~ < ~~?;:J':: , -- I • 'f. , .... ;,'; • \ " ;( ~ . '" , .:••• • "1 ••• •; ~ ,~ 20ft},..... "',. £OD9" . ... , . " .... ,' ! . .... ...... • . , .. z '. ', . o 800007906 KHUPHUKANI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY RUSTFONTEIN FARM. GERT SIBANDE 2 36 R 740 w 800007898 KHUPHUKANI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY E 1874 , FERNIE A GERT SIBANDE 2 269 R 740 ...... ~ 800007963 KHUTSONG PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY STAND N02832 . NEU-HALLE NKANGALA 2 378 R 740 <0 800029652 KING MAKHOSONKE II SECONDARY SCHOOL SECONDARY 1779 MOlOTO EXT 2 , MOLOTO NORTH NKANGALA 2 1075 R 740 CO 800008003 KIWI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY KIWI FARM , LYDENBURG EHLANZENI 2 122 R 740 800008029 KLEINSKUUR PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY KLEINSKUUR FARM , BALFOUR GERT SIBANDE 2 22 R 740 800008417 KOBI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY MZINTI TRUST , STAND NO 496 EHLANZENI 2 502 R740 800008433 KOMATIDRAAI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY TSB FARM, KOMATIDRAAI EHLANZENI 2 43 R 740 800008441 KOME PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY MAJATLADI SECTION, LEFISWANE VILLAGE NKANGALA 2 344 R 740 800008524 KROMDRAAI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY HLALANIKAHLE EXTENSION 4 , EMALAHLENI NKANGALA 2 743 R 740 800008532 KROMKRANS PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY KROMKRANSFARM , BREYTON GERT SIBANDE 2 17 R 740 oG) 800008599 KUSILE PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY NHLALAKAHLE , KABOKWENI EHLANZENI 2 389 R 740 < 2 779 R 740 m 800034784 KWACHIBIKHULU PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY KWACHIBIKHULU TOWNSHIP, CHRISSIESMEER GERT SIBANDE J) 300008656 KWl\GUQ,A.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Olifants River Area, Transvaal
    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VANSUID-AFRIKA· DEPARTMENT OF MINES DEPARTEMENT VAN MYNWESE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIESE OPNAME THE GEOLOGY OF THE OLIFANTS RIVER AREA, TRANSVAAL AN EXPLANATION OF SHEETS 2429B (CHUNIESPOORT) AND 2430A (WOLKBERG) by J. S. I. Sehwellnus, D.Se., L. N. J. Engelbrecht, B.Sc., F. J. Coertze, B.Sc. (Hons.), H. D. Russell, B.Sc., S. J. Malherbe, B.Sc. (Hons.), D. P. van Rooyen, B.Sc., and R. Cooke, B.Sc. Met 'n opsomming in Afrikaans onder die opskrif: DIE GEOLOGIE VAN DIE GEBIED OLIFANTSRIVIER, TRANSVAAL COPYRIGHT RESERVED/KOPIEREG VOORBEHOU (1962) Printed by and obtainable (rom Gedruk deur en verkrygbaar the Government Printer, B(ls~ van die Staatsdrukker, Bosman­ man Street, Pretoria. straat, Pretoria. Geological map in colour on a Geologiese kaart in kleur op 'n scale of I: 125,000 obtainable skaal van I: 125.000 apart ver­ separately at the price of 60c. krygbaar teen die prys van 60c. & .r.::-~ h'd'~, '!!~l p,'-' r\ f: ~ . ~) t,~ i"'-, i CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT ........................ ' ••• no ..........' ........" ... • • • • • • • • •• 1 I. INTRODUCTION........ •.••••••••.••••••••.....••...•.•..••••..• 3 II. PHYSIOGRAPHY................................................ 4 A. ToPOGRAPHY..... • • . • • . • . • • . • • • . • • . • . • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • ... 4 B. DRAINAGE.................................................... 6 C. CLIMATE ..........•.••••.•••••.••....................... ,.... 7 D. VEGETATION .••••.•••••.•.........•..... , ..............•... , . 7 III. GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed Magisterial District Ermelo Main Seat of Msukaligwa Magisterial District
    # # !C # # ### !C^ !.C# # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # !C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # #!C# # # # # # !C ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # !C # !C # #^ # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # # !C# ## # # # # # !C # # !C# # # # #^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C # # # # ## # # # # # # ## # ## #!C # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # !C # # # ##!C ## ## ## # # # # # # # # # #^ # # ## # # # !C # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # ## # ##^ # !C #!C## # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # # !C# ^ ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # !C # #!C # # #!C # # !C## # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # ## ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # #!C # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # ^ # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # #!C # # !C # # !C ## # # # # #!C # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C# # ## # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # ### #!C# # # !C !C# # !C # ## # # # # # # # # !C# # !.# # # # ## ## # #!C# # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ### ##^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # ^ # !C# ## # # # # # # !C## # ## # # # # ## # # # # # ## # # # # #!C## !C# # !C# ## # !C### # # ^ # # # !C ### # # # !C# ##!C # !C # # # ^ !C ## # # #!C # ## ## # # ## # # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C # ## ## # # # # !C # # ^ # ## # ## # # # !.!C ## # # ## # # # # !C # # !C# # ### # # # # # # # # # # ## !C # # # # ## !C #
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio
    SUBSURFACE FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE DEVONIAN BEREA SANDSTONE IN SOUTHEASTERN OHIO William T. Garnes A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2014 Committee: James Evans, Advisor Jeffrey Snyder Charles Onasch ii ABSTRACT James Evans, Advisor The Devonian Berea Sandstone is an internally complex, heterogeneous unit that appears prominently both in outcrop and subsurface in Ohio. While the unit is clearly deltaic in outcrops in northeastern Ohio, its depositional setting is more problematic in southeastern Ohio where it is only found in the subsurface. The goal of this project was to search for evidence of a barrier island/inlet channel depositional environment for the Berea Sandstone to assess whether the Berea Sandstone was deposited under conditions in southeastern Ohio unique from northeastern Ohio. This project involved looking at cores from 5 wells: 3426 (Athens Co.), 3425 (Meigs Co.), 3253 (Athens Co.), 3252 (Athens Co.), and 3251 (Athens Co.) In cores, the Berea Sandstone ranges from 2 to 10 m (8-32 ft) thick, with an average thickness of 6.3 m (20.7 ft). Core descriptions involved hand specimens, thin section descriptions, and core photography. In addition to these 5 wells, the gamma ray logs from 13 wells were used to interpret the architecture and lithologies of the Berea Sandstone in Athens Co. and Meigs Co. as well as surrounding Vinton, Washington, and Morgan counties. Analysis from this study shows evidence of deltaic lobe progradation, abandonment, and re-working. Evidence of interdistributary bays with shallow sub-tidal environments, as well as large sand bodies, is also present.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequence Stratigraphic Development of the Neoarchean Transvaal Carbonate Platform, Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa Dawn Y
    DAWN Y. SUMNER AND NICOLAS J. BEUKES 11 Sequence Stratigraphic Development of the Neoarchean Transvaal carbonate platform, Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa Dawn Y. Sumner Department of Geology, University of California 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA e-mail: [email protected] Nicolas J. Beukes Department of Geology, University of Johannesburg P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, 2000 South Africa e-mail: [email protected] © 2006 March Geological Society of South Africa ABSTRACT The ~2.67 to ~2.46 Ga lower Transvaal Supergroup, South Africa, consists of a mixed siliciclastic-carbonate ramp that grades upward into an extensive carbonate platform, overlain by deep subtidal banded iron-formation. It is composed of 14 third-order sequences that develop from a mixed siliciclastic-carbonate ramp to a steepened margin followed by a rimmed margin that separated lagoonal environments from the open ocean. Drowning of the platform coincided with deposition of banded iron-formation across the Kaapvaal Craton. The geometry and stacking of these sequences are consistent with more recent patterns of carbonate accumulation, demonstrating that Neoarchean carbonate accumulation responded to subsidence, sea level change, and carbonate production similarly to Proterozoic and Phanerozoic platforms. The similarity of carbonate platform geometry through time, even with significant changes in dominant biota, demonstrates that rimmed margins are localized primarily by physiochemical conditions rather than growth dynamics of specific organisms. Stratigraphic patterns during deposition of the Schmidtsdrift and Campbellrand-Malmani subgroups are most consistent with variable thinning of the Kaapvaal Craton during extrusion of the ~2.7 Ga Ventersdorp lavas. Although depositional patterns are consistent with rifting of the western margin of the Kaapvaal Craton during this time, a rift-to-drift transition is not required to explain subsidence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology and Geochemistry of the Sterkspruit Intrusion, Barberton Mountain Land, Mpumalanga Province
    THE GEOLOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE STERKSPRUIT INTRUSION, BARBERTON MOUNTAIN LAND, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE Gavin Patrick Conway A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Johannesburg, 1997 11 DECLARATION I declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work. It is being submitted for the Degree of Master of Science in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for any degree or examination in any other University. __I_It __ ·daYOf A~V\.-~t 19 't1-- 111 ABSTRACT The Sterkspruit Intrusion, in the south-western portion of the Barberton greenstone belt, is a sill-like body containing rocks of gabbroic to dioritic composition. It is hosted by a sequence of komatiitic basalts and komatiites of the Lower Onverwacht Group. The intrusion is considered unique in this area in that it lacks ultramafic components and has no affinities with the surrounding mafic- to- ultramafic lavas. The gabbroic suite also contains an unusual abundance of quartz, and the chill margin shows an evolved quartz-normative, tholeiitic parental magma. Based on petrographic and geochemical evidence, the intrusion can be subdivided into four gabbroic zones and a quartz diorite, which is an end product of a differentiating magma. The chill margin records an MgO content of 4.8%, an Mg# of 42, an Si02 value of 52.5% and a normative plagioclase composition of An 44. The sill-like nature of the body, indicated by geochemical trends, and the steep sub-vertical layering, point to a body that has been tilted along with the surrounding lavas.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Mpumalanga Province
    Section B: DistrictProfile MpumalangaHealth Profiles Province 13 Mpumalanga Province Gert Sibande District Municipality (DC30) Overview of the district The Gert Sibande District Municipalitya is a Category C municipality located in the Mpumalanga Province. It is bordered by the Ehlanzeni and Nkangala District Municipalities to the north, KwaZulu-Natal and the Free State to the south, Swaziland to the east, and Gauteng to the west. The district is the largest of the three districts in the province, making up almost half of its geographical area. It is comprised of seven local municipalities: Govan Mbeki, Chief Albert Luthuli, Msukaligwa, Dipaleseng, Mkhondo, Lekwa and Pixley Ka Seme. Highways that pass through Gert Sibande District Municipality include the N11, which goes through to the N2 in KwaZulu-Natal, the N17 from Gauteng passing through to Swaziland, and the N3 from Gauteng to KwaZulu-Natal. Area: 31 841km² Population (2016)b: 1 158 573 Population density (2016): 36.4 persons per km2 Estimated medical scheme coverage: 13.5% Cities/Towns: Amersfoort, Amsterdam, Balfour, Bethal, Breyten, Carolina, Charl Cilliers, Chrissiesmeer, Davel, Ekulindeni, Embalenhle, Empuluzi, Ermelo, Evander, Greylingstad, Grootvlei, Kinross, Leandra, Lothair, Morgenzon, Perdekop, Secunda, Standerton, Trichardt, Volksrust, Wakkerstroom, eManzana, eMkhondo (Piet Retief). Main Economic Sectors: Manufacturing (57.4%), agriculture (41.4%), trade (25.8%), transport (24.5%), finance (21.2%), mining (14.1%), community services (12.3%), construction (2.1%). Population distribution, local municipality boundaries and health facility locations Source: Mid-Year Population Estimates 2016, Stats SA. a The Local Government Handbook South Africa 2017. A complete guide to municipalities in South Africa. Seventh edition. Accessible at: www.
    [Show full text]
  • Article ISSN 1179-3163 (Online Edition)
    Phytotaxa 408 (1): 069–076 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.408.1.5 Gymnosporia sekhukhuniensis (Celastraceae), a new species from South Africa MARIE JORDAAN1,2 & ABRAHAM E. VAN WYK1,2* 1National Herbarium, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa. 2H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002 South Africa. *Author for correspondence. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Gymnosporia sekhukhuniensis, a new species from north-eastern South Africa, is described, illustrated, mapped, and compared with closely related species. It belongs to Gymnosporia sect. Buxifoliae, more specifically Group 1, the members of which are characterized by the capsules being (2)3(4)-valved, rugose or verrucose, and the seeds partially covered by the aril. The new species has a restricted distribution range and is near-endemic to the Sekhukhuneland Centre of Endemism. This biogeographical region rich in restricted-range plants is more or less congruent with surface outcrops of mafic and ultramafic igneous rocks belonging to the Rustenburg Layered Suite of the eastern Bushveld Complex. The range of the new species shows marginal intrusion into the far northern part of the nearby Wolkberg Centre of Endemism, where it is associated with dolomites of the Malmani Subgroup. Gymnosporia sekhukhuniensis is a suffrutex mainly associated with rocky outcrops in open savannah. Diagnostic characters include its dwarf habit (up to 1.6 m tall), capsules that are relatively small (5–8 mm long), woody, scaly-rugose, with hard pointed apices, and leaves that are very laxly arranged on the stems, with some often present on the thorns.
    [Show full text]
  • National Norms and Standards for School Funding
    Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyright Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 N (D . ..... ,t' . : _ '. <' HAMtOfsCH,G:ca' . '. ,0000000cf" , hEAANE:R ~I~Y1 ~ ADD~()F,SCH~ :·~.7 ili~ ' :p'ERLEAiN~ ; ~~~t~~J?i,'JJ-~~~ " ; ~ , ..•. -. ':. ~., ~ .r ~~ . ",1 ,,' : • • - •• <", .{ ',::(: '"..': h' ,." :. ~ " ~ ~ · .AU.tic~TtoN SEC~~Yf . ~?:"~'~'~~' , , ~ .:~?~:' ~y>'> ~;"~ , , :o·~~~:t.~1 .' ; ";"~' i" , -",. ,.>;.j;..... .', . ,.. '.\. z 800015008 MOKIBE PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY KWARTSPRUIT FARM, ZAAIHOEK NKANGALA 1 248 R 807 o NKANGALA 1 224 R807 w 800015040 MOLEBYE PRIMARY SCHOOL INTERMEDIATE SIYADLELWA BAROKONG BA LEFIFI, NOKANENG .... R 807 800015131 MOOtBANK PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY MOOIBANK FARM, AMERSFOORT GERT SIBANDE 1 219 +>­ CD 800015149 MOOLMAN PRIMARY SCHOOL COMBINED SPEENKOPPIES FARM, MOOLMAN GERT SIBANDE 1 340 R807 (Xl 800015164 MOPEDI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY FRISGEWMGD FARM, HENDRINA NKANGALA 1 49 R807 800034871 MOREl PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY DINGLEYDALE A NEXT TO GASELEKANE , BUSHBUCKRIDGE 1 759 R807 800005561 MOTSWEDI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY 1149 LESELESELENG , SEABE NKANGALA 1 349 R807 800015503 MOZANE PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY BAKENKOP FARM, PIET RETIEF GERT SIBANDE 1 88 R 807 800034922 MPHAKU PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY ISLINGTON VILLAGE , KHOKHOVELA BUSHBUCKRIDGE 1 295 R807 800035164 MPIKANISO PRIMARY SCHOOL BUSHBUCKRIDGE 1 926 R 807 800015750 MRUBHE PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY BooMPLAAS , BREYTEN GERT SIBANDE 1 55 R807 G) 1 524 R 807 o 800015792 MSINYANE SECONDARY SCHOOL SECONDARY SPRINGBOKKRML , ISWEPE
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report
    SCOPING REPORT: THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DAM AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE AS PART OF THE UPGRADING OF THE BULK WATER SUPPLY SCHEME TO AMSTERDAM, MPUMALANGA Report prepared for: Gert Sibande District Municipality Report dated: March 2017 (draft) Report number: EIA 2017/01 Prepared by: AdiEnvironmental cc P.O. Box 647 Witbank 1035 Tel: 013 – 697 5021 Fax: 013 – 697 5021 E-mail: [email protected] Author: R. van Rensburg and A. Erasmus PROJECT INFORMATION SUMMARY Scoping Report: Construction of a new dam and PROJECT TITLE associated infrastructure as part of the upgrading of the bulk water supply scheme to Amsterdam, Mpumalanga CLIENT Gert Sibande District Municipality CONTACT DETAILS P.O. Box 1748 Ermelo 2350 017 – 801 7214 CONSULTANT AdiEnvironmental cc CONTACT DETAILS P.O. Box 647 Witbank 1035 013-697 5021 DARDLEA REFERENCE NO. AdiE REFERENCE NO. EIA 2017/01 REPORT VERSION Scoping Report - Draft DATE March 2017 REPORT VERSION DATE COPYRIGHT RESERVED No part of this document may be reproduced in any manner without full acknowledgement of the source. This report should be cited as: AdiEnvironmental cc. 2017. Scoping Report: Construction of a new dam and associated infrastructure as part of the upgrading of the bulk water supply scheme to Amsterdam, Mpumalanga UNDERTAKING BY EAP as required in terms of Section 2(j) of Appendix 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014. I, ..............................................., hereby confirm that: the information provided in this Draft Scoping Report is, to the best of my knowledge, correct as at the time of compilation thereof; comments and inputs obtained from stakeholders and interested and affected parties through the scoping phase have been included in this Draft Scoping Report; information provided to interested and affected parties during the scoping phase has been included in this Draft Scoping Report; responses provided to interested and affected parties during the scoping phase have been included in this Draft Scoping Report.
    [Show full text]