Pittsburgh District Conference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pittsburgh District Conference Pittsburgh District Conference October 25, 2020 2:00 pm Via Zoom The Reverend Dawn M. Hand, District Superintendent Western Pennsylvania Annual Conference The United Methodist Church 901 Allegheny Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15233 Phone: 412-281-7152 E-Mail: [email protected] Fax: 412-314-8901 Website: wpaumc.org/Pittsburgh TABLE OF CONTENTS Agenda ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Minutes of 2019 District Conference .............................................................................................................. 2 – 4 Appointment Changes ........................................................................................................................................... 5 – 6 Retirements ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2019 Connectional Apportionment Giving ................................................................................................... 7 – 8 District Leadership and Committee Representatives ............................................................................. 9 – 11 District Committee on Ordained Ministry .................................................................................................... 9 District Missional Strategy Team ................................................................................................................... 10 Superintendency and Trustee Committee .................................................................................................. 10 District Anti-Racism Team ................................................................................................................................ 10 District Committee on Lay Servant Ministries .......................................................................................... 11 District Nominations Committee .................................................................................................................... 11 Board of Church Location and Building ....................................................................................................... 11 District Representatives on Conference Committees (Informational) ......................................... 12 – 15 District Lay Equalization Candidates for 2021 Annual Conference ......................................................... 16 District Committee Reports ........................................................................................................................... 17 – 20 District Committee on Lay Servant Ministry.............................................................................................. 17 District Missional Strategist Team ................................................................................................................. 18 District Building and Location Committee ................................................................................................. 18 Report of the District Nominations Committee ........................................................................................ 18 Pittsburgh District Anti-Racism Team ............................................................................................... 19 – 20 District Committee on Ministry ...................................................................................................................... 21 District UMVIM and Disaster Response Reports ............................................................................ 22 – 23 Ministry Reports ................................................................................................................................................ 24 – 29 Nyadire Connection ................................................................................................................................... 24 – 27 United Methodist Church Union ........................................................................................................... 28 – 29 PITTSBURGH DISTRICT CONFERENCE October 25, 2020, 2 pm The Rev. Dawn M. Hand, District Superintendent Presiding GATHERING MUSIC WELCOME & CENTERING TIME The Reverend Dawn M. Hand, District Superintendent Mrs. Shannon Shaffer, District Lay Leader BUSINESS MEETING CALL TO ORDER Rev. Hand ELECTION OF SECRETARY Ms. Pam Honeychurch Pittsburgh District Administrative Assistant APPROVAL OF 2019 DISTRICT CONFERENCE MINUTES See Pages 2 – 4 CFA PRESENTATION (2021Conference Budget) Rev. Don Kephart CLERGY APPOINTMENTS & RETIREMENTS See Pages 5 & 6 2019 CONNECTIONAL APPORTIONMENT RECOGNITION See Page 7 Certificates of Appreciation for 100% or More Giving DISTRICT CONFERENCE ACTIONS ELECTION OF DISTRICT COMMITTEE LEADERSHIP See pages 9 – 11 NOMINATION OF LAY EQUALIZATION DELEGATES 2021 Annual Conference See Page 16 APPROVAL OF DISTRICT COMMITTEE REPORTS See Pages 17 - 20 ANNOUNCEMENTS MINISTRY PRESENTATIONS Laity Report Shannon Shaffer Abundant Health & Covid Response Dr. Jessica Price Nyadire Connection Ralph Duckworth District Vision, Values, Goals & Objectives Rev. Scott Shaffer Disability Awareness Rev. Chad Bogdewic Dismantling Racism Rev. Kellie Wild ADJOURNMENT & BENEDICTION 1 Minutes of Pittsburgh District Conference April 13, 2019, 10 am, at Bakerstown United Methodist Church Those in attendance: Rev. Ed Bailey (Ingomar & UM Foundation), Florence Black (Fairhaven), Rev. Don Blinn, Jr. (Warren/Anne Ashley), Rev. Cyndi Bloise (Jefferson), Frank Bloise (Jefferson), Martha Boward (Sewickley), Darlene Calhoun (West View), Mary Frances Cooper (Community: Aspinwall), Rev. Greg Cox (Ingomar), Rev. Tracy Cox (First: Pittsburgh), Bill Crooks (Community: Aspinwall), Rev. John Devey (West Homestead), Roger DeWitt (Little Hill), Rev. Keith Dunn (Bakerstown), Sean Dunning (Shannopin), Rev. David Ewing (Greenstone), Rev. Roberta Farls (Sheraden/Christ Community), Rev. Tom Fodor (Little Hill/Shannopin/Glenwillard), Marion Funk (Whitaker), Rev. Jim Gascoine (Dutilh), Sharon Gregory (Warren), Rev. Jim Hamilton (Sewickley), Wilma Hamilton (Sewickley), District Superintendent Dawn Hand (Pittsburgh District), Drew Harvey (Christ: Bethel Park), Sandra Haun (Whitaker), Rev. Karen Hecht (Whitaker), Rev. Larry P. Homitsky (Calvary), Pam Honeychurch (Pittsburgh District), Lyndall Huggler (Faith: Fox Chapel), Sandy Huling (Coraopolis), Jan Johnson (West View), Mark Jordan (Bakerstown), Rev. Don Kephart (Homestead Park), Marge Kirkpatrick (Bakerstown), Rev. Penny Lyon (Salem), Terry Lyon (Salem), Tracy Merrick (First: Pittsburgh), Candace Morgan (New Day-Swissvale), Rev. Chris Morgan (Christ: Bethel Park), Rev. Dai Morgan (UM Advocacy in PA), Sandy Ord (Glenwillard), Rev. Ben Phipps (Faith: Fox Chapel), Sharon Platt (Bakerstown), Rev. David Pogany (Eighth Ave. Place/New Day-Swissvale), Rev. Matt Price (South Hills Partnership), Rev. Diane Randolph (Millvale), Sandy Riczu (Homestead Park), Pat Schmidt (Salem), Rev. Scott Shaffer (Faith: Fox Chapel), Shannon Shaffer (Faith: Fox Chapel), Rev. Russel Shuluga (Sewickley), Rev. Karen Slusser (St. Paul's), Rev. Kelly Smith (Mifflin Avenue/South Avenue), Dara Sterling (St. Paul's), Rev. Jeff Sterling (St. Paul's), Rev. Bruce Stollings (McKnight), Rev. Tom Strandburg (Mt. Lebanon), Rev. E. David Streets (Ingomar), Rev. Drew Sutton (West View), Cindy Ulrich (West View), Claudia K. (Kim) Viehland (Mifflin Avenue), Keith Volhop (Bakerstown), Rev. Amy Wagner (WPAUMC), Peggy Ward (Greenstone), Rev. Luke Whipple (Bakerstown), Rev. Kellie Wild (East End Cooperative Ministry), David Wire (West View), and Rev. Dean Ziegler (Coraopolis) After a time of worship, the business portion of the meeting was called to order at 10:38 am. Pam Honeychurch was elected secretary by voice vote. The minutes of the 2018 District Conference corrected to include Bruce Stollings (McKnight) as in attendance. With a motion from Tracy Cox, seconded by Tracy Merrick, the minutes were approved as amended with no objections. Jeff Sterling, who is a member of the Council on Finance and Administration, gave a presentation on the proposed 2020 Conference budget of $8,847,347, which is down from $9,499,524 in 2019. There should be a meaningful decrease in Connectional Apportionment for the local churches. A vote will be taken at Annual Conference to change Connectional Apportionments to an income based formula. Pastors retiring, as well as those coming into and leaving the District, were recognized. They are noted on page 5 of the packet. Present were Ea Kyoung “Amy” Jun, appointed to Circleville UMC in the Greensburg District and Drew Sutton, who is returning to his home Louisiana Conference. Also present was retiree Don Blinn, and retired elder Dean Ziegler, who has been serving as an interim pastor at Coraopolis. A summary of Connectional Apportionment giving for 2018 is on pages 6 and 7 of the 2019 District Conference Packet. The churches who gave 100% or greater were personally 2 recognized with certificates and letters from Bishop Moore-Koikoi and the Western Pennsylvania Conference. Those with improved giving were also recognized. After a motion from Sharon Gregory, seconded by Flo Black, the tellers and alternate teller, as listed on page 2, were elected. As motioned by Peggy Ward and seconded by Sandy Riczu, The District leadership and committees, as found on pages 8 - 10, were accepted. Fred Watts, who
Recommended publications
  • Sheraden Homestead
    HISTORIC REVIEW COMMISSION Division of Development Administration and Review City of Pittsburgh, Department of City Planning 200 Ross Street, Third Floor Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY HISTORIC NOMINATION FORM Fee Schedule HRC Staff Use Only Please make check payable to Treasurer, City of Pittsburgh Date Received: ................................................ Individual Landmark Nomination: $100.00 Parcel No.: ...................................................... District Nomination: $250.00 Ward: .............................................................. Zoning Classification: ..................................... 1. HISTORIC NAME OF PROPERTY: Bldg. Inspector: ............................................... Council District: .............................................. Sheraden Homestead 2. CURRENT NAME OF PROPERTY: 2803 Bergman St. 3. LOCATION a. Street: 2803 Bergman St. b. City, State, Zip Code: Pittsburgh, Pa. 15204 c. Neighborhood: Sheraden 4. OWNERSHIP d. Owner(s): John G. Blakeley e. Street: 2803 Bergman St. f. City, State, Zip Code: Pittsburgh, Pa. 15204 Phone: () 5. CLASSIFICATION AND USE – Check all that apply Type Ownership Current Use: Structure Private – home Residential District Private – other Site Public – government Object Public - other Place of religious worship 1 6. NOMINATED BY: a. Name: Matthew W.C. Falcone b. Street: 1501 Reedsdale St., Suite 5003 c. City, State, Zip: Pittsburgh, Pa. 15233 d. Phone: (412) 256-8755 Email: [email protected] 7. DESCRIPTION Provide a narrative
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of a Neighborhood: Homewood in the 21St Century, 2011
    ANATOMY OF A NEIGHBORHOOD: HOMEWOOD IN THE 21ST CENTURY March 2011 Project in support of the Homewood Children’s Village report: State of the Village, 2011 Program in Urban and Regional Analysis University Center for Social and Urban Research University of Pittsburgh 121 University Place Pittsburgh, PA 15260 Homewood Children’s Village University of Pittsburgh School of Social Work Center on Race and Social Problems Executive Summary The Urban and Regional Analysis program at the University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) has been engaged in a number of projects involving Pittsburgh neighborhoods, with its Pittsburgh Neighborhood and Community Information System (PNCIS) serving as a valuable resource for these projects. Homewood is a neighborhood in Pittsburgh’s East End that has experienced tremendous change since the 1940s, as suburbanization, population loss and post-industrial restructuring of the Pittsburgh region have deeply affected this community. This report summarizes collaboration between UCSUR and the Homewood Children’s Village in 2010. Information from this study will also be part of the Homewood Children’s Village State of the Village (2011).1 Some prominent changes and trends analyzed in this report include: Homewood continues to lose population. Between 2000 and 2010, Homewood’s population dropped 30.6 percent, to 6,600 residents. In Homewood South and Homewood West, residents aged 65 and over make up nearly a third of the population. The average sales price for existing residential homes in Homewood was $9,060 in 2009, one-tenth the average price for a home in the City of Pittsburgh. This 2009 price represents a substantial loss of home equity from twenty years earlier, when the average home sold for over $22,000 in current (2010) dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST PITTSBURGH Community Plan NRC Foreclosure Properties
    WEST PITTSBURGH Community Plan NRC Foreclosure Properties Block & ZIP Month Lot Address Street Code Use Description Neighborhood Filing Date January 40-C-80 1234 EARLHAM ST 12805 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Crafton Heights 20090121 42-C-151 3312 RADCLIFFE ST 12005 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Esplen 20090122 42-S-267 2749 GLENMAWR ST 12005 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Sheraden 20090115 42-S-258 2769 GLENMAWR ST 12005 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Sheraden 20090115 42-N-250 1239 PRITCHARD ST 12005 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Sheraden 20090105 71-L-259 1470 HASS ST 12006 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Chartiers City 20090112 19-A-176 116 CEDARBROOK DR 12803 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Crafton Heights 20090121 21-K-24 2645 W CARSON ST 12060 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Esplen 20090115 21-N-4 2661 GLENMAWR ST 12005 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Sheraden 20090115 February 42-L-97 3117 BERGMAN ST 12005 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Sheraden 20090226 42-N-173 3154 CHARTIERS AVE 12005 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Sheraden 20090223 70-C-23 3408 CLEARFIELD ST 12802 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Windgap 20090217 71-B-293 3909 WINDGAP AVE 12802 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Windgap 20090211 20-R-2 728 RUDOLPH ST 12004 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Elliott 20090203 March 41-A-164 3011 BRISCOE ST 12004 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Sheraden 20090302 41-S-269 975 LOGUE ST 12804 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Crafton Heights 20090324 41-S-10 1036 WOODLOW ST 12804 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Crafton Heights 20090302 42-L-66 3036 BERGMAN ST 12005 Residential SINGLE FAMILY Sheraden 20090316 42-L-182 3135 LANDIS
    [Show full text]
  • City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Profiles Census 2010 Summary File 1 (Sf1) Data
    CITY OF PITTSBURGH NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILES CENSUS 2010 SUMMARY FILE 1 (SF1) DATA PROGRAM IN URBAN AND REGIONAL ANALYSIS UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR SOCIAL AND URBAN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH JULY 2011 www.ucsur.pitt.edu About the University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) The University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) was established in 1972 to serve as a resource for researchers and educators interested in the basic and applied social and behavioral sciences. As a hub for interdisciplinary research and collaboration, UCSUR promotes a research agenda focused on the social, economic and health issues most relevant to our society. UCSUR maintains a permanent research infrastructure available to faculty and the community with the capacity to: (1) conduct all types of survey research, including complex web surveys; (2) carry out regional econometric modeling; (3) analyze qualitative data using state‐of‐the‐art computer methods, including web‐based studies; (4) obtain, format, and analyze spatial data; (5) acquire, manage, and analyze large secondary and administrative data sets including Census data; and (6) design and carry out descriptive, evaluation, and intervention studies. UCSUR plays a critical role in the development of new research projects through consultation with faculty investigators. The long‐term goals of UCSUR fall into three broad domains: (1) provide state‐of‐the‐art research and support services for investigators interested in interdisciplinary research in the behavioral, social, and clinical sciences; (2) develop nationally recognized research programs within the Center in a few selected areas; and (3) support the teaching mission of the University through graduate student, post‐ doctoral, and junior faculty mentoring, teaching courses on research methods in the social sciences, and providing research internships to undergraduate and graduate students.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Brief — Assessing Community Need Within the City of Pittsburgh
    DATA BRIEF: Assessing Community Need Within the City of Pittsburgh December 2015 In 2014, the Allegheny County Department of Human Services (DHS) published two reports about assessing need within suburban communities by using the Community Need Index, a DHS-developed tool designed to address the specific needs 1 1 Suburban Poverty: Assessing and circumstances of suburban residents. The reports — and Community Need Outside the Central City and Data Brief: the Community Need Index upon which they were based — Suburban Poverty: Assessing Community Need Outside the stimulated community discussion. Requests were made Central City — 2012 Update for similar data about City of Pittsburgh neighborhoods. This brief provides an overview of the methodology involved in developing the Pittsburgh Need Index as well as the results of applying the index to city neighborhoods. MODEL DESCRIPTION The Pittsburgh Need Index uses methodology similar to the Suburban Community Need Index, but is altered for urban tracts within the City of Pittsburgh. Insights were drawn from other research about community need — most notably a 2006 single-value index project by the 2 http://www.huduser.org/ U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development2 — as well as research and analysis from portal/publications/ the University of Pittsburgh’s University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) and the comm_index.pdf Local Initiatives Support Corporation’s (LISC) inventory of “core indicators.” The index variables and modifications from the original Suburban Community Need Index are outlined below: Variables/Methodology City Census tracts were ranked across each of the variables listed in Table 1, then averaged into a total ranking and divided into 10 approximately even tiers of need.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher and Rapid Rehousing Programs in Allegheny County
    Research Report Moving to Opportunity or Disadvantage? An Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher and Rapid Rehousing Programs in Allegheny County March 2020 The Allegheny County Department of Human Services One Smithfield Street Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 www.alleghenycountyanalytics.us Basic Needs | An Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher and Rapid Rehousing Programs in Allegheny County | March 2020 page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Figures and Tables 5 Definitions 6 Acronyms 7 Introduction 7 Background 7 Methodology 11 Limitations 15 Analysis 15 Demographics of Rental Subsidy Participants 15 HCV Households by Level of Disadvantage (move-in date 2017) 16 RRH Households by Level of Disadvantage (move-in date 2017) 18 Insights from Both Programs 20 Subsidized Housing Distribution in City of Pittsburgh versus Suburban Census Tracts 22 County-Wide Distribution of Households Living in Areas of High or Extreme Disadvantage 24 Moving Patterns Among HCV Households over Time 26 Discussion and Next Steps 27 APPENDIX A: HCV and RRH Program Details 30 APPENDIX B: Community Disadvantage Indicators and Sources 32 APPENDIX C: Allegheny County Census Tracts by Level of Disadvantage 33 APPENDIX D: Allegheny County Census Tracts by Disadvantage with Municipal Borders and Labels 34 APPENDIX E: Allegheny County Census Tracts by Disadvantage with City of Pittsburgh Neighborhoods and Labels 35 www.alleghenycountyanalytics.us | The Allegheny County Department of Human Services Basic Needs | An Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher and Rapid Rehousing Programs in Allegheny County | March 2020 page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Decades of social science research show that place has a profound influence on child-to-adult outcomes and this finding has far-reaching implications for how affordable housing policy should be designed and implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Governmental Services for the 27Th Legislative District
    2015Guide to Governmental Services for the 27th Legislative District www.pahouse.com/Deasy DISTRICT OFFICE: 436 S. Main St., Suite 100 • Pittsburgh, PA 15220 (412) 928-9514 • Fax: (412) 565-3170 CAPITOL OFFICE: Provided by 323 Irvis Office Building • P.O. Box 202027 State Representative Harrisburg, PA 17120-2027 (717) 772-8187 • Fax: (717) 787-7388 Dan Deasy WEBSITE: www.pahouse.com/Deasy PA TREASURY www.patreasury.gov • (717) 787-2465 College Savings Program 1 (800) 440-4000 Contracts/Public Records 1 (800) 252-4700 Uncashed/Forged Checks (717) 705-4499 Unclaimed Property 1 (800) 222-2046 Unemployment Comp. Disbursement 1 (877) 869-1956 • (717) 787-6595 UTILITIES Allegheny County Weatherization Program Action Housing City of Pittsburgh Residents (412) 281-2102, x2101 Allegheny County Residents (412) 281-2102, x2053 Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) (Cash/Crisis) 1 (866) 857-7095 PA Public Utility Commission www.puc.state.pa.us • 1 (800) 692-7380 VETERAN SERVICES Allegheny County Veterans’ Services Ronald Conley, Director 4141 Fifth Ave. Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (412) 621-4357 PA Dept. of Military & Veterans Affairs www.dmva.state.pa.us 1 (800) 547-2838 Representing parts of the Pittsburgh Vet Center 2500 Baldwick Road, Suite 15, Pittsburgh, PA 15205 19th Ward of the City of (412) 920-1765 Pittsburgh, all of the 20 VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA 15240 and 28th Wards of the City (412) 822-2222 or 1 (866) 482-7488 of Pittsburgh; Boroughs Veterans Benefits Administration 1000 Liberty Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15222 of Green Tree, Crafton, 1 (800) 827-1000 Ingram, McKees Rocks and Veterans Leadership Program of Western PA 2417 East Carson Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15203 Thornburg.
    [Show full text]
  • G2 West Busway-All Stops
    G2 WEST BUSWAY-ALL STOPS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY SERVICE SATURDAY SERVICE To Downtown Pittsburgh To Carnegie To Downtown Pittsburgh To Carnegie Carnegie Carnegie Station Carnegie Bell Station Stop C Crafton Crafton Station Stop C Sheraden Sheraden Station Stop C South Shore WCarsonSt at Duquesne Incline Downtown Liberty Ave at SixthAve Downtown Liberty Ave at William Penn Pl Downtown Liberty Ave at William Penn Pl Downtown Seventh Ave at SmithfieldSt South Shore W Carson St opp. Duquesne Incline Sheraden Sheraden Station Stop A Crafton Crafton Station Stop A Carnegie Carnegie Station Carnegie Carnegie Station Carnegie Bell Station Stop C Crafton Crafton Station Stop C Sheraden Sheraden Station Stop C South Shore WCarsonSt at Duquesne Incline Downtown Liberty Ave at SixthAve Downtown Liberty Ave at William Penn Pl Downtown Liberty Ave at William Penn Pl Downtown Seventh Ave at SmithfieldSt South Shore W Carson St opp. Duquesne Incline Sheraden Sheraden Station Stop A Crafton Crafton Station Stop A Carnegie Carnegie Station 5:07 5:11 5:14 5:18 5:23 5:28 5:30 5:30 5:33 5:40 5:44 5:47 5:52 6:29 6:32 6:35 6:39 6:43 6:49 6:50 6:50 6:54 7:00 7:05 7:08 7:13 5:27 5:31 5:34 5:38 5:43 5:48 5:50 5:50 5:53 6:00 6:04 6:07 6:12 6:59 7:02 7:05 7:09 7:13 7:19 7:20 7:20 7:24 7:30 7:35 7:38 7:43 5:46 5:49 5:52 5:56 6:01 6:08 6:10 6:10 6:13 6:20 6:24 6:27 6:32 7:34 7:37 7:40 7:44 7:48 7:54 7:55 7:55 7:59 8:05 8:10 8:13 8:18 6:06 6:09 6:12 6:16 6:21 6:28 6:30 6:30 6:34 6:41 6:45 6:48 6:53 8:04 8:07 8:10 8:14 8:18 8:24 8:25 8:25 8:29 8:35 8:40 8:43 8:48 6:21
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh's Gateway Communities
    Pittsburgh’s Gateway Communities Center for Economic Development Carnegie Mellon University Center for Economic Development 4516 Henry Street UTDC Suite 208 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Phone: 412.268.9880 Fax: 412.268.9828 November 2003 www.smartpolicy.org Smart Policy for Innovative Regions 1 Pittsburgh’s Gateway Communities by Lena Andrews Pittsburgh has not been a destination for international immigration into the United States. Out of the 50 largest metropolitan areas, Pittsburgh has a lower share of foreign residents than all cities except for Cincinnati. For a region that is losing people, in a time when much population growth is fueled by international immigration, we must make Pittsburgh a destination. It is possible for Midwestern cities to attract foreign immigration; Cleveland, Minneapolis, and St. Louis are similar to Pittsburgh in many ways but they have larger foreign communities. The dominant pattern of foreign immigration is the clustering of ethnic groups around certain neighborhoods. People tend to move to places where they feel comfortable. Certain communities serve as gateways, welcoming new migrants into a city. The existence and operation of these gateway communities can be a critical factor in making the city a destination for immigration. This report identifies Pittsburgh’s 1 gateway communities for several groups of immigrants. 1 This report focuses on the city of Pittsburgh because it accounts for 30% of the region’s foreign population compared to 14% of the total regional population. Nine of the ten census tracts in the metropolitan area with the largest foreign populations are located in the city of Pittsburgh. Future reports will examine foreign communities throughout the metropolitan area.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Planning Sector 4: West Pittsburgh West End & Elliott Neighborhoods Report of Findings and Recommendations
    Architectural Inventory for the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Planning Sector 4: West Pittsburgh West End & Elliott Neighborhoods Report of Findings and Recommendations The City of Pittsburgh In Cooperation With: Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission September 2018 Paving Chartiers Avenue in Elliott, April 28, 1910, view northwest from Lorenz Avenue. Pittsburgh City Photographer’s Collection, Archives of Industrial Society, University of Pittsburgh Prepared By: Michael Baker International, Inc. Jesse A. Belfast Justin Greenawalt and Clio Consulting Angelique Bamberg with Cosmos Technologies, Inc. James Brown The Architectural Inventory for the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, was made possible with funding provided by the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office (PA SHPO), the City of Pittsburgh, and the U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Certified Local Government program. The contents and opinions contained in this document do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against
    [Show full text]
  • SS Fact Sheet-5-2005
    SouthSouth SideSide FACTSFACTS Hello! Schools have long been was a physician at Fort Pitt, as well as students from all districts south of part of South Side life. The front a large landowner on the South Side. the Monongahela River attended. In his will, he gave the land to the Students came from Mt. Lebanon, of this fact sheet tells you about Borough of Birmingham for a school. Dormont, Sheraden, Carrick, some of South Side’s first schools, Today, this building has been and Brentwood. and on the back you’ll find facts made into condominiums. The original blackboards still hang on about schools today. the walls! Humboldt School was built in 1867. The original building had nine rooms and was referred to as an acad- emy. In 1881 nine more rooms were added and the building became known as a “school house.” The school was torn down in 1957, and a new school, Phillips Elementary, was built on the same piece of land. Birmingham Public School South Side High School opened around 1870, on South 14th Street, and was renovated in 1925. Two additions were built in 1924 The red-brick building served as a and 1936. South Side High School school for just over 130 years. After was the first city school to have all- Schools Long Ago Birmingham Public School closed, weather turf installed in its stadium. In 1850, Birmingham No. 1 opened. the school re-opened in 1940 as St. From September 1985 through It was the largest public school on Adalbert’s School, then became South June 2004 the school was used for the South Side at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Census 2000 City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Rankings – November 2002 Ranked by Percent Population Age 25 and Over with Bachelors Degree Or Higher
    Census 2000 City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Rankings – November 2002 Ranked by Percent Population Age 25 and over with Bachelors degree or higher 1 Squirrel Hill North 76.5% 46 Crafton Heights 14.1% 2 Shadyside 71.7% 47 Polish Hill 14.1% 3 Point Breeze 69.1% 48 New Homestead 13.5% 4 Regent Square 67.4% 49 Central Lawrenceville 12.9% 5 North Oakland 66.8% 50 Bon Air 12.1% 6 Squirrel Hill South 63.0% 51 Sheraden 12.1% 7 Allegheny West 55.3% 52 Perry South 11.8% 8 North Shore 55.1% 53 Hazelwood 11.7% 9 Highland Park 53.1% 54 Beltzhoover 11.3% 10 Central Oakland 45.1% 55 Crawford-Roberts 11.0% 11 Friendship 42.5% 56 Allentown 10.5% 12 Point Breeze North 35.0% 57 Lincoln-Larimer 10.4% 13 Strip District 34.2% 58 California Kurkbudle 10.3% 14 Allegheny Center 34.2% 59 Overbrook 10.3% 15 Swisshelm Park 33.6% 60 East Hills 10.3% 16 Banksville 32.9% 61 Carrick 10.3% 17 Stanton Heights 31.9% 62 Middle Hill 9.8% 18 Greenfield 29.9% 63 Garfield 9.7% 19 Duquesne Heights 29.5% 64 Troy Hill 9.7% 20 South Shore 27.9% 65 Spring Hill-CV 9.5% 21 Bloomfield 27.6% 66 Upper Lawrenceville 9.2% 22 South Oakland 27.3% 67 Homewood West 9.0% 23 Morningside 27.0% 68 Lincoln Place 8.8% 24 South Side Flats 25.2% 69 Larimer 8.5% 25 Mount Washington 24.3% 70 Homewood North 8.3% 26 Central Northside 24.1% 71 Knoxville 8.3% 27 West Oakland 23.1% 72 Fairywood 8.2% 28 Golden Triangle 22.9% 73 Arlington 7.9% 29 Oakwood 22.1% 74 Chartiers City 7.9% 30 Westwood 21.9% 75 Hays 7.8% 31 Brighton Heights 21.3% 76 Glen Hazel 7.5% 32 Perry North 21.0% 77 Elliot 7.4% 33 Upper Hill
    [Show full text]