STATEMENT of JUSTIFICATION for SPECIAL USE PERMIT Chapel Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STATEMENT of JUSTIFICATION for SPECIAL USE PERMIT Chapel Of STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION for SPECIAL USE PERMIT Chapel of the Cross 304 E. Franklin St. Chapel Hill, NC Chapel Hill Township, PIN 9788-57-0788 Revised June 20, 2011 Introduction Chapel of the Cross requests a Special Use Permit (SUP) for the subject property to allow re- development of a portion of the property for expanded Church facilities. The property consists of a single 1.55 acre parcel situated on the south side of East Franklin Street diagonally across from Pickard Lane. The UNC-Chapel Hill campus adjoins the property to the east, south, and west. Morehead Planetarium lies to the southwest, with its front parking lot situated immediately west of the church property. To the east is Spencer dorm, which is bounded by Raleigh Street further to the east. Coker Arboretum lies directly to the south. Several sorority and fraternity houses are situated across Franklin Street opposite the church property. The property is currently zoned OI-3 and lies within the Franklin-Rosemary Historic District. No other overlay zoning district exists on the property. In conjunction with the SUP application, the church also requests a Zoning Atlas Amendment for the property from OI-3 to TC-1(C), in order to accommodate the necessary floor area for the proposed facilities. The subject property is currently used intensively for Church, Church outreach, and community activities. The Church has been an integral and important part of Chapel Hill since the mid-1800s, even before the existing chapel was consecrated in 1848. As the parish has grown and required larger facilities to serve its parishioners and carry out its prolific ministries, new structures were added in 1916, 1925, 1958, and 1993. Also, significant renovations to the facilities were made in 1979 and again in 1993. In 2001, the Church identified the need for additional planning and implementation for facility improvements which would bring all non- worship facilities into an adequate proportional space relationship to the two existing worship spaces and the congregation size. The 2001 study emphasized the need for a fellowship hall which could accommodate a reception following a service, wedding, or funeral in the larger church. The current SUP application reflects these identified needs, and represents the collective planning efforts over several years by scores of people who are intimately familiar with Church needs, programs, and mission. In planning for the future, Chapel of the Cross has affirmed its long-term commitment to downtown Chapel Hill. The Church’s downtown location is integral to its identity, conducive to its overall mission, and critical to its specific ministries. Approval of the requested SUP 1 application will allow the Church to expand and improve its ability to serve the parish, the University, and the larger world community, from the Church’s current downtown location. Justification The Applicant believes that the requested SUP modification is justified by all of the required findings prescribed in The Town of Chapel Hill Land Use Management Ordinance (LUMO) Sec. 4.5.2. Evidence in support of these findings is presented as follows: Finding # 1: That the use or development is located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. General The proposed improvements to the church property will promote the public’s general welfare in several important ways. The church buildings and grounds will continue to be a safe and healthy environment for parishioners, visitors, workers, and students, in accordance with all applicable zoning, building, health, and life-safety codes. The improvements will consist of the removal or renovation of some existing facilities that do not meet standards applicable to new construction; and the construction of new facilities which will fully meet current requirements. In this way, the improved facilities will provide a higher degree of safety, accessibility, and environmental stewardship than is currently available in the existing facilities. Church facilities are also used extensively by organizations and for activities not directly related to the Church, such as Alcoholics Anonymous – Orange, the Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts of America, and English as a Second Language classes, to name just a few. Over 30 outside groups are provided space to meet free of charge. In addition, the Church has strong ties to the University’s students, faculty and staff through a number of University and related ministries. These provide numerous means of positive impact on students and others who are affiliated with the University. In these ways, overall public health and welfare are promoted and supported by Church activities, and by the use of Church facilities. Emergency Services Fire protection and “first responder” emergency services will be provided by the Town of Chapel Hill. The Town’s Fire Station #1 is located approximately one-half mile from the site, as measured along Columbia and Franklin Streets, the most likely approach route to the site. The new buildings will be equipped with a fire suppression sprinkler system, and will be designed using conventional fire-prevention and fire-management strategies. The site and building plans will be reviewed and approved by the Town’s Fire Department, to verify conformance to applicable life-safety regulations and standards. 2 Utility and Solid Waste Services The Church facilities will continue to be served with public water and sanitary sewer service by the existing connections to OWASA utility systems, meeting all public health standards related thereto. Solid waste collection for the facility will be provided by the Town of Chapel Hill, and collection of recycled material will be provided by the Orange County Solid Waste Management Department. Solid waste management and recycling methods and facilities will be reviewed and approved by both of these agencies, for conformance to all applicable regulations and standards. Traffic Generation General The Church expects that only a small amount of additional traffic will be generated by the proposed improvements, because seating capacity in the two primary worship spaces will not be expanded. Further, due to the unique conditions associated with this property, and the off- peak demands related to typical Church activities, the additional traffic demands will be adequately accommodated by existing public street infrastructure, public and private parking facilities, and the existing network of pedestrian walkways. Background Data The Church currently has two separate sanctuary spaces, which are rarely used at the same time. The larger sanctuary seats a maximum of 400 people, and the smaller chapel seats a maximum of 138 people. Both sanctuary spaces will be retained, and neither space will have increased seating capacity as a result of the proposed improvements. The Church’s peak attendance occurs on Sundays, which typically include four or five separate worship services at various times throughout the day. Average Sunday attendance is about 850 people, with a maximum of about 400 people in any one service. Weekday activities at the Church are much less intense. They include pre-school activities, mid-week services, and a variety of small-scale meetings for various Church ministries and for community groups loosely affiliated or unaffiliated with the Church. A significant percentage of attendees are students or other nearby residents who walk or bike to the property. Overall, the Church estimates that about 25 % of attendees walk or bike to services, rather than using an automobile. Increased Traffic Demand The estimated number of new vehicular trips generated on Sundays due to the proposed site and building improvements is 102 trips (51 round trips). This increased demand will be dispersed over the multiple services throughout the day, rather than being concentrated for a single service. 3 Traffic Modes and Impacts Since the Church is located on a compact downtown property, a relatively small number of onsite parking spaces are available onsite. Therefore, only a small fraction of the vehicular traffic generated by Church activities actually occurs onsite. As a practical matter, the vast majority of vehicular traffic generated by Sunday Church activities does not present itself to the site as vehicular traffic at all, but rather as pedestrian traffic. In this context, the additional trips generated by proposed improvements will not represent increased vehicular pressure on the site itself, but rather, on the general downtown area surrounding the site. Since the small amount of additional Sunday traffic will not coincide with peak-day or peak-hour background traffic, traffic impacts from proposed improvements will be relatively small and insignificant. Parking The site currently provides several bicycle parking spaces onsite. These facilities will be re- designed in appropriate numbers and locations, to encourage and accommodate biking as a viable means of transportation to and from the property. The proposed improvements will result in the loss of a few onsite automobile parking spaces, but onsite parking is not as critical for this site as it would be for a church located in a more suburban area. For this site, the majority of automobile traffic generated by Sunday activities currently parks in dispersed locations throughout the area surrounding the Church property, including the adjacent Morehead Planetarium parking lot, in designated on-street parking spaces along Franklin Street
Recommended publications
  • March 27, 2018 RESTORATION of CAPPONI CHAPEL in CHURCH of SANTA FELICITA in FLORENCE, ITALY, COMPLETED THANKS to SUPPORT FROM
    Media Contact: For additional information, Libby Mark or Heather Meltzer at Bow Bridge Communications, LLC, New York City; +1 347-460-5566; [email protected]. March 27, 2018 RESTORATION OF CAPPONI CHAPEL IN CHURCH OF SANTA FELICITA IN FLORENCE, ITALY, COMPLETED THANKS TO SUPPORT FROM FRIENDS OF FLORENCE Yearlong project celebrated with the reopening of the Renaissance architectural masterpiece on March 28, 2018: press conference 10:30 am and public event 6:00 pm Washington, DC....Friends of Florence celebrates the completion of a comprehensive restoration of the Capponi Chapel in the 16th-century church Santa Felicita on March 28, 2018. The restoration project, initiated in March 2017, included all the artworks and decorative elements in the Chapel, including Jacopo Pontormo's majestic altarpiece, a large-scale painting depicting the Deposition from the Cross (1525‒28). Enabled by a major donation to Friends of Florence from Kathe and John Dyson of New York, the project was approved by the Soprintendenza Archeologia Belle Arti e Paesaggio di Firenze, Pistoia, e Prato, entrusted to the restorer Daniele Rossi, and monitored by Daniele Rapino, the Pontormo’s Deposition after restoration. Soprintendenza officer responsible for the Santo Spirito neighborhood. The Capponi Chapel was designed by Filippo Brunelleschi for the Barbadori family around 1422. Lodovico di Gino Capponi, a nobleman and wealthy banker, purchased the chapel in 1525 to serve as his family’s mausoleum. In 1526, Capponi commissioned Capponi Chapel, Church of St. Felicita Pontormo to decorate it. Pontormo is considered one of the most before restoration. innovative and original figures of the first half of the 16th century and the Chapel one of his greatest masterpieces.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Renovation Guidelines and Protocols
    GUIDELINES and PROTOCOLS for the DESIGN and RENOVATION of CHURCHES and CHAPELS First Sunday of Advent December 1, 2013 Catholic Diocese of Saginaw Office of Liturgy The Office of Liturgy for the Diocese of Saginaw has prepared this set of guidelines and protocols to be used in conjunction with those outlined in Built of Living Stones. This diocesan document attempts to give clearer direction to those areas that Built of Living Stones leaves open to particular diocesan recommendations and directives. All those involved in any design for new construction or renovation project of a church or chapel in the Diocese of Saginaw should be familiar with these guidelines and protocols and ensure that their intent is incorporated into any proposed design. Guidelines and Protocols for the Design And Renovation of Churches and Chapels Text 2009, Diocese of Saginaw, Office of Liturgy. Latest Revision Date: December 1, 2013. Excerpts from Built of Living Stones: Art, Architecture, and Worship: Guidelines of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops copyright 2001, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Washington, DC. Used with permission. All rights reserved. Excerpts taken with permission and appreciation from similar publications from the following: Archdiocese of Chicago; Diocese of Grand Rapids; Diocese of Seattle; Archdiocese of Milwaukee; Diocese of Lexington; Archdiocese of Philadelphia and Diocese of La Crosse. No part of these works may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the copyright holder. Printed in the United States of America For you have made the whole world a temple of your glory, that your name might everywhere be extolled, yet you allow us to consecrate to you apt places for the divine mysteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Guided Tour of the Basilica 13
    Self-Guided Tour of the Basilica 13 This tour takes you from the baptismal 14 font near the main entrance, down the 12 center aisle to the sanctuary, then right to the east apsidal chapels, back to the 16 15 11 Lady Chapel, and then to the west side chapels. The Basilica museum may be 18 17 7 10 reached through the west transept. 9 The Bishops’ Museum, located in the Basilica’s basement, contains pontificalia of various American bishops, dating from the 19th century. 11 6 5 20 19 8 4 3 BASILICA OF THE Saint André Bessette, C.S.C. (1845-1937), founder of St. Joseph’s SACRED HEART FLOOR PLAN Oratory, Montréal, Canada, was canonized by Pope Benedict XVI on October 17, 2010. The statue of Saint André Bessette was designed 1. Font, Ambry, Paschal Candle by the Rev. Anthony Lauck, C.S.C. (1985). Saint André’s feast day is 2. Holtkamp Organ (1978) 8 January 6. 3. Sanctuary Crossing 2 4. Seal of the Congregation of Holy Cross 1 5. Altar of Sacrifice 6. Ambo (Pulpit) 9 7. Original Altar / Tabernacle 8. East Transept and World War I Memorial Entrance 9. Tintinnabulum 10. St. Joseph Chapel (Pietà) 11. St. Mary / Bro. André Chapel 2 12. Reliquary Chapel 17 13. The Lady Chapel / Baroque Altar 14. Holy Angels / Guadalupe Chapel 15. Mural of Our Lady of Lourdes 16. Our Lady of Victory / Basil Moreau Chapel 17. Ombrellino 18. Stations of the Cross Chapel / Tomb of A “minor basilica” is a special designation given by the Pope to certain John Cardinal O’Hara, C.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Altars Personified: the Cult of the Saints and the Chapel System in Pope Pascal I's S. Prassede (817-819) Judson J
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Faculty Publications and Research Pomona Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2005 Altars personified: the cult of the saints and the chapel system in Pope Pascal I's S. Prassede (817-819) Judson J. Emerick Pomona College Deborah Mauskopf Deliyannis Recommended Citation "Altars Personified: The ultC of the Saints and the Chapel System in Pope Pascal I's S. Prassede (817-819)" in Archaelogy in Architecture: Studies in Honor of Cecil L. Striker, ed. J. Emerick and D. Deliyannis (Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern, 2005), pp. 43-63. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pomona Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pomona Faculty Publications and Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archaeology in Architecture: Studies in Honor of Cecil L. Striker Edited by Judson J. Em erick and Deborah M. Deliyannis VERLAG PHILIPP VON ZABERN . MAINZ AM RHEIN VII, 216 pages with 146 black and white illustrations and 19 color illustrations Published with the assistance of a grant from the James and Nan Farquhar History of An Fund at the University of Pennsylvania Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Bibliotbek Die Deutsche Bibliorhek lists this publication in the Deutsche NationalbibJ iographie; detailed bibliographic data is available on the Internet at dJttp://dnb.ddb.de> . © 2005 by Verlag Philipp von Zabern, Maim am Rhein ISBN- I0: 3-8053-3492-3 ISBN- 13: 978-3-8053-3492-1 Design: Ragnar Schon, Verlag Philipp von Zabern, Maim All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Muroya Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY A COMPARISON OF NORMAN ARCHITECTURE IN THE KINGDOMS OF ENGLAND AND SICILY Mikito Muroya FALL 2014 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in History with honors in History Reviewed and approved* by the following: Kathryn Salzer Assistant Professor of History Thesis Supervisor Mike Milligan Senior Lecturer in History Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT This study offers a comparison of the differing architectural styles and forms in the Norman Kingdoms of Sicily and England, exploring what exactly differed, as well as attempting to determine why such differences exist in each area. In the Kingdom of England, the Normans largely imported their own forms from Normandy, incorporating little of the Anglo-Saxon architectural heritage. There are in fact examples of seemingly deliberate attempts to eliminate important Anglo-Saxon buildings and replace them with structures built along Norman lines. By contrast, in the Kingdom of Sicily, buildings erected after the arrival of the Normans feature a mix of styles, incorporating features of the earlier Islamic, Byzantine and local Italian Romanesque, as well as the Normans' own forms. It is difficult to say why such variance existed, but there are numerous possibilities. Some result from the way each state was formed: England had already existed as a kingdom when the Normans conquered the land and replaced the ruling class, while the Kingdom of Sicily was a creation of the Norman conquerors; furthermore, the length of time taken to complete the conquest contrasted greatly.
    [Show full text]
  • Eltham Palace: Its Chapels and Chaplains
    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 83 1968 ELTHAM PALACE: ITS CHAPELS AND CHAPLAINS By H. J. PRAGNELL ELTHAM PALACE as we see it today is represented by a fifteenth- century Great Hall, stone and brick walls surrounding the moat, and a triple-arched stone bridge thought to have been rebuilt in the reign of Edward IV. The only pictorial record of the complete palace known to exist, the engraving by Peter Stent made about 1650, is inaccurate in some details and is in any case drawn from a considerable distance outside the moated area. It may well be that Stent never saw the palace and made his engraving from somebody else's drawing. Nonsuch Palace which was once thought to have little pictorial evidence surviving is rich in comparison with Eltham. We are fortunate, however, in possessing two plans of Eltham by John Thorpe which are thought to have been made about 1590 but may in fact be slightly later. Accounts for 1603-04 record payment for 'measuring' the plan of the house,1 whereas no such payment occurs in the accounts c. 1590 though the annual records of repair work are complete for this period. One plan covers the outer court, the other the moated area. Both have been carefully studied and were redrawn as a single plan for inclusion in Clapham and Godfrey's Famous Buildings and their Story, 1913. From the plan of the moated area it is possible to see the approximate shape and proportions of the Great Chapel as it existed in the sixteenth century. This plan will be referred to later in connection with the rebuilding of the chapel by order of Henry VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Pontormo's Capponi Chapel* Leosteinberg
    385 Pontormo's Capponi Chapel* LeoSteinberg Pontormo's work in the Capponi Chapel in Santa Felicita, as "Christ is taken away from His Mother, towards the Florence, began in I525 with the decoration of its hemis- tomb... the Virgin's gesture... becomes one of farewell." pherical dome, a fresco of God the Father surrounded by Meanwhile, on the vault surface directly opposite, the figure four patriarchs. The fresco was followed by four circular of God the Father (known to us from the Uffizi drawings, panels for the pendentives with bust portraits of the evan- Figs. 4-5) extends his right hand in "a gesture of sublime gelists, partly Bronzino's work,1 and by the great altar- compassion and benediction directed across the Chapel to the piece, variously called Descentfrom the Cross (or Deposition), dead Christ." "The fusion by gesture and emotion of dome Pietd, or Entombment (Fig. I).2 The final work, datable in and altarpiece has the effect that the subject-matter of the 1528, was the fresco of the Annunciationon the window wall. parts also becomes one, and that an action takes place across This last, the four tondi, and the altarpiece in its rich the space of the chapel."6 period frame are intact. The cupola decoration was lost In what follows, I will have to quarrel with almost every when the original dome was destroyed to make way for the detail of Shearman's analysis. But my disagreements, in- present shallower vault; nor do we know whether this oc- stead of invalidating, will, I believe, confirm his essential curred in the sixteenth or the eighteenth century.3 In fact, intuition.
    [Show full text]
  • St Ansem's Chapel, Canterbury Cathedral
    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 18 1889 ( 169 ) ST. ANSBLM'S CHAPEL, CANTEBBTOY CATHEDEAL. (EOEMEELT THE CHAPEi OF SAIHTS PETBE AKD PAUL.) BY CANON SCOTT ROBERTSON. THIS chapel, upon tlie soutli side of the choir's south aisle, stands above the crypt-chapel of St. Gabriel, the paintings in which were described by me, and fully illustrated, in Archceologia, Oantiana,, Vol. XHI., pp. 48-80. Late in the year 1888, Canon Francis J. Holland gener- ously undertook to restore St. Anselm's Chapel, and to fit it up for the use of such small congregations as would assemble, for instance, at early morning administrations of the Holy Communion. In the course of the work necessary for carrying out Ms purpose, certain discoveries have been made which are of interest. Especially deserving of mention and of record, is the uncovering of a painting, in distemper, of St. Paul, shaking off the viper into the fire at Melita. The work, wMch Canon Holland had undertaken, was found to require far greater labour and much longer time, than he or any one could possibly have anticipated. Before describing it in. detail, it may be well to recall to the reader's memory what, the chapel contains. It formed part of Ernulf's and Conrad's work at the commencement of the twelfth century. On the north side of this: chapel stands the elaborately carved tomb of Archbishop Simon Mepham, who died in 1338-4 on the llth of February. The record of his inter- 170 ST. ANSELM'S OHAPEL, ment states that lie was buried in the Chapel of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonconformist Places of Worship Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary
    Nonconformist Places of Worship Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which lack such a summary. This can either be where the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. Many of these are what might be thought of as ‘new heritage’, that is they date from after the Second World War. ‘Nonconformist’ has long been used as a description of Protestant Christians in England and Wales who were not part of the Church of England. Among the numerous denominations are the Baptists, Methodists, Quakers and the Salvation Army. By the mid-nineteenth century their chapels and meeting houses, the subject of this brief introduction, outnumbered the buildings of the Church of England’s. While many chapels are now disused or have seen conversion, they remain characteristic and often notable buildings in settlements in all parts of the country. This guidance note has been written by Christopher Wakeling and edited by Paul Stamper. It is one is of several guidance documents that can be accessed at HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/listing-selection/ihas-buildings/ Published by Historic England August 2016. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/ Front cover The large granite Wesleyan chapel of 1843 at Ponsanooth (Cornwall) dominates this former industrial village, known for its gunpowder mills.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 2 – Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings
    Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 2 – Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice Volume 2: Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings 1st Edition – July 2012 Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 2 – Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings From time to time amendments and supplements will be notified by email. In order to receive notification you are invited to email your request to [email protected]. The Code can also be downloaded from the Church Commissioners’ website (http://www.ccpastoral.org/mpm2011code). Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 2 – Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings Contents List of Common Acronyms Chapter 12 - Introduction 12.1 – 12.7 Introduction 12.8 Background to the Code 12.9 What the Code sets out to do 12.10 - 12.12 Presentation 12.13 Updating the Code 12.14 - 12.21 Key statutory bodies 12.22 - 12.24 General duty Chapter 13 - The role of the Diocesan Mission and Pastoral Committee 13.1 - 13.2 Appointment and membership 13.3 - 13.6 Annual and interim reports 13.7 - 3.8 Considerations, functions and duties 13.9 - 13.11 Ascertainment of views of interested parties: statutory requirements 13.12 - 13.15 Ascertainment of views: arrangements in practice 13.16 - 13.19 Submission of proposals to the Commissioners 13.20 - 13.21 Draft
    [Show full text]
  • Luce Chapel.Pdf
    1 Luce Chapel is a renowned architecture in Taiwan. With its outstanding achievements, it certainly stands outin the modern architectural movement of Preface post-war Taiwan. In October 2014, Luce Chapel was chosen to be one of the ten global classic modern architectures, and the first project within Asian architecture,which received the first “Keeping It Modern” (hereafter abbreviated as KIM) Grant from the Getty Foundation. The Grant acknowledgesthese 20th century modern architectures as milestones of human civilization. With high experimental mentalities, groups of architects and engineersof the previous centuryboldlytried out exploratory materials and cutting edge construction techniques, and built innovative architectures thathave stimulated changes in their surrounding environments, histories, local culture, and forever transformed the philosophical approaches of architecture. However, the Getty Foundation also regards these architectures to be under various degrees of risks. Being fifty to sixty or even older, many of these innovative materials and techniques boldly used at the time oftheirsconstruction were not, and still have not been scientifically tested and analyzed to this very day. Furthermore, the productions of many of these materials have been discontinued due to low adoptions in the market, making conservations even more difficult. Therefore, the Getty Foundation KIM grants promote the sustainable conservation of modern architecture. This focus has also been the core value of the Luce Chapel conservation project. Built in 1963, Luce Chapel has stood on the campus of Tunghai University for over 50 years. This building was designed and built to function as a church building, and has maintained its religious purpose over the years.However, as the number of faculty and students continues to grow,the space demand for community engagements and ceremonial activities of colleges and departments on campus have also increased extensively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frontier Kingdom of Norman Sicily in Comparative Perspective
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2020- 2020 The Uniqueness of a Kingdom: The Frontier Kingdom of Norman Sicily in Comparative Perspective Onyx De La Osa University of Central Florida, [email protected] Part of the European History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd2020 University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2020- by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation De La Osa, Onyx, "The Uniqueness of a Kingdom: The Frontier Kingdom of Norman Sicily in Comparative Perspective" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2020-. 33. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd2020/33 THE UNIQUENESS OF A KINGDOM: THE FRONTIER KINGDOM OF NORMAN SICILY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE by ONYX DE LA OSA B.A. Florida Atlantic University, 2014 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2020 © 2020 Onyx De La Osa ii ABSTRACT The frontier was once described as lands on the periphery of a culture. I argue that frontier spaces are a third space where hybridity can occur. Several of these areas existed in the medieval world with many centering around the Mediterranean and its surrounding lands. The Norman kingdom of Sicily is one such place.
    [Show full text]