DOCSLIB.ORG

GEOMETRY of ELEMENTARY PARTICLES Andrzej Derdzinski Contents Introduction. This Is a Presentation of the Standard Model of Eleme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GEOMETRY of ELEMENTARY PARTICLES Andrzej Derdzinski Contents Introduction. This Is a Presentation of the Standard Model of Eleme Proc. Symposia in Pure Math., 54 (1993), edited by R. E. Greene and S.-T. Yau, Part 2, 157{171 GEOMETRY OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES Andrzej Derdzinski Contents 1. Particles and interactions in nature. 2. Bundles over the spacetime. 3. Models of free matter particles. 4. The Yang-Mills description of interactions. 5. The standard model. 6. Grand unifications. Introduction. This is a presentation of the standard model of elementary par- ticles, i.e., their generally accepted theory, discussed here on the classical level (without field quantization). Our basic reference is the book [5], for which the present paper forms a self-contained summary. The author also intends to pro- vide in [6] and [7] a more detailed treatment of particle geometry, along with its quantized version. Although this material is covered in numerous physics textbooks (such as [2] { [4], [9], [14], [15], [18], [20] { [23]), the approach adopted here may be particularly suitable for a mathematician reader due to its consistently geometric language. Pre- sentations of more general topics are also available in the mathematical literature; see, for instance, [1], [8], [10], [12], [13], [16], [17], [19]. The theory outlined below does not, by itself, provide a usable model of the real world, even though it accounts well for many qualitative effects. Its inadequacy as a source of quantitative predictions is mainly due to its classical (macroscopic) char- acter, as opposed to the predominantly quantum (small-scale) properties displayed by elementary particles in nature. However, instead of discarding the classical model for this reason, one uses field quantization to transform it into a quantum theory, which supplies the required \microscopic" corrections. Cross-references in the text are indicated by arrows ( ). ! 1. Particles and interactions in nature 1.0. Experimental data show that there are over 200 species (kinds) of sub- atomic particles, such as the electron e, proton p, neutron n, photon γ, electronic 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 53C80; Secondary 81T13, 53B50, 81V05, 81V10, 81V15, 81V22. Key words and phrases. Standard model, electroweak model, quark model, gauge theory. Supported in part by NSF Grant DMS-8601282. Typeset by -TEX AMS 1 2 GEOMETRY OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES 0 neutrino νe, neutral pion π , etc. ( 1.5, 1.6). Particles interact in four basic ways, known as the strong, electromagnetic,! weak and gravitational interactions (forces), ordered here by decreasing strength of the interaction, i.e., probability of its occurrence in the given circumstances. We will not discuss gravitational forces, negligibly weak on the microscopic level; see, however, 2.0. 1.1. Particle invariants assign to particle species elements of various Abelian semigroups. Here belong, for instance, the mass m R+ = [0; ), electric charge 2 11 1 Q Z ( 1.2), average lifetime τ (0; ], as well as spin s Z+ = 0; ; 1;::: 2 ! 2 1 2 2 f 2 g and parity " Z2 = 1; 1 . The spin measures the capacity of the particle to carry internal2 angularf momentum− g (as if it were rotating about its axis), while the parity of the particle describes symmetry properties of its configurations with respect to space reflections ( 3.3, 3.5). Particles with s Z (resp., s Z) are known as bosons (resp., fermions! ). 2 62 1.2. Quantization of the electric charge. According to experimental ev- idence (Millikan, 1909) and theoretical arguments ( 5.1.iv), the electric charge always comes in integral multiples of the electron charge! q (by convention, q < 0). Charges of individual particle species may be indicated by superscripts such as 0 + ++ + 0 0 0 −; ; ; ; so that e = e−; p = p ; n = n ; γ = γ ; νe = ν , etc. ( 1.0). e ! 1.3. Interaction carriers are the few particle species that serve as agents mediating interactions. These are: the photon γ ( 5.1.ii) for electromagnetism, + 0 ! the weak bosons W ; W−; Z for the weak interaction ( 5.3.ii.b,c), eight kinds of gluons ( 5.2.ii) for the strong force and, probably, gravitons! for gravity. Except for gravitons! with s = 2, their spins ( 1.1) all equal 1. ! 1.4. Matter particles, i.e., those particle species which are not interaction carriers, may in turn be classified into hadrons and leptons, depending on whether they can or cannot participate in the strong interaction. 1 1.5. Leptons consist of 12 known species, all of spin 2 ( 1.1): the electron e, muon µ and tauon τ (with positive masses and electric charge! 1), the electri- − cally neutral, massless neutrinos νe; νµ; ντ , as well as their antiparticles ( 3.2.i): + + + ! e ; µ ; τ ; νe; νµ; ντ . 1.6. Hadrons which are fermions (resp., bosons, 1.1) are called baryons (resp., mesons), with about 100 known species of either.! For instance, π0 is a meson. Baryons can further be divided into the disjoint classes of baryons proper (such as p; n), and their antiparticles ( 3.2.i), the antibaryons. ! 1.7. Classification of elementary particles, as outlined above: interaction carriers 8 > > leptons > all particles > 8 <> > ··· > matter particles <> mesons > ··· 8 > hadrons < baryons proper > > ··· baryons > > ··· antibaryons : :> : PROC. SYMPOSIA IN PURE MATH., 54 (1993), 157-171 3 2. Bundles over the spacetime 2.0. Spacetime. We work with a fixed spacetime ( ; g), which is a 4-manifold endowed with a pseudo-Riemannian metric g of signatureM + + + and with aMtime orientation, i.e., a continuous choice x C+ of one (\future")− component 7! x of the timelike cone Cx = v Tx : g(v; v) < 0 at each x . Although one often assumes that fis an2 affineM space and ggis translation2 M invariant (the Minkowski spacetime), nonflatM spacetimes are also used, as models of gravity (in general relativity). 2.1. Vector bundles over the spacetime ( ; g), used below, include the M product line bundle 1 = C , the tangent bundle T = T , its dual T ∗, the 4 M × M bundle Λ T ∗ of volume forms (pseudoscalars) on and, for each k Z+, the k M 2 bundle S T ∗ whose fibre over x consists of all real k-linear symmetric forms 0 2 M on Tx with g-contraction zero (i.e., of all pseudo-spherical harmonics in Tx ). M M 2.2. Weyl spinors. Whenever necessary, the spacetime ( ; g) will be assumed to be an orientable spin manifold. Denoting L; R the orientationsM of , we may M then choose fixed Weyl spinor bundles σL ; σR over ( ; g), with σR = σL ( 3.2). They are complex vector bundles of fibre dimensionM 2, obtained from a common! spin structure over ( ; g) via two mutually conjugate nontrivial representations of M Spin(3; 1) = SL(2; C) in C2. The (Levi-Civita) spinor connection ◦ in σ and σ r L R then gives rise to the Dirac operator sending sections of σL to those of σR and vice versa. D 2.3. Dirac spinors. If ( ; g) is orientable and spin, we choose a fixed Dirac M spinor bundle over ( ; g) to be the direct sum σ = σL + σR of the Weyl spinor bundles selected as inM 2.2, with unordered summands, so that no orientation of M is distinguished. The operators ◦ and now are also defined in σ. r D 3. Models of free matter particles 3.0. Particle models. Each particle species is represented by ("lives in") a specific fibre bundle η, endowed with some additional geometric structure, over the spacetime manifold ( 2.0). The sections of η are to be thought of as \semiclassical states" ofM the particle,! evolving with time in a manner described by suitable field equations (which form a part of the geometry of η). 3.1. Models of matter particles ( 1.4) are vector bundles and their field equations are linear. For those matter particles! which are free, i.e., not subject to interactions, the choices of bundles and equations are quite specific ( 3.3 { 3.5). On the other hand, interaction carriers are represented by a special type! of affine bundles ( 4.0) which, for many "practical" purposes, may also be regarded as vector bundles! ( 4.4, 5.3.ii,iii). ! 3.2. Physical meaning of vector bundle operations. Equalities between vector or affine bundles, such as (η∗)∗ = η, stand for natural (functorial) isomor- phisms, the category in question being usually clear from the context. For a complex vector bundle η over , let η be its conjugate bundle, with each fibre η ; x , M x 2 M 4 GEOMETRY OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES consisting of all antilinear maps ηx∗ C . Thus, we have η = η∗ whenever the ge- ometry of η involves a fixed Hermitian! fibre metric (which may even be indefinite), as is the case for all models of free matter particles except neutrinos ( 3.4). ! i. For a particle species represented by a complex vector bundle η ( 3.0, 3.1), the conjugate η, along with the corresponding \conjugate geometry",! may be expected to host another, related particle species, called the an- tiparticle of the original one. The resulting antiparticle formation (denoted ), leaves most of the relevant particle invariants ( 1.1) either completely unchanged (e.g., " for bosons, m; τ; s), or just changes! their signs (as in the case of " for fermions and Q ; 3.5, 5.1.iii). Antiparticles also make sense for interaction carriers ( 4.4,! 5.3.ii.b,c), and, in fact, turn out to exist for all particles known in! nature. However, some species (referred to as strictly neutral) coincide with their antiparticles and then it is natu- ral to represent them by real rather than complex bundles. For instance, 0 0 0 0 + + π = π ; γ = γ; Z = Z , while (W ) = W−; e = e = e; νe = νe; p = p; n = n (notation of 1.0, 1.2, 1.3).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Introduction 2 Klein Gordon Equation
    Thimo Preis 1 1 Introduction Non-relativistic quantum mechanics refers to the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics applied in the context of Galilean relativity, more specifically quantizing the equations from the Hamiltonian formalism of non-relativistic Classical Mechanics by replacing dynamical variables by operators through the correspondence principle. Therefore, the physical properties predicted by the Schrödinger theory are invariant in a Galilean change of referential, but they do not have the invariance under a Lorentz change of referential required by the principle of relativity. In particular, all phenomena concerning the interaction between light and matter, such as emission, absorption or scattering of photons, is outside the framework of non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics. One of the main difficulties in elaborating relativistic Quantum Mechanics comes from the fact that the law of conservation of the number of particles ceases in general to be true. Due to the equivalence of mass and energy there can be creation or absorption of particles whenever the interactions give rise to energy transfers equal or superior to the rest massses of these particles. This theory, which i am about to present to you, is not exempt of difficulties, but it accounts for a very large body of experimental facts. We will base our deductions upon the six axioms of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics.Therefore, with the principles of quantum mechanics and of relativistic invariance at our disposal we will try to construct a Lorentz covariant wave equation. For this we need special relativity. 1.1 Special Relativity Special relativity states that the laws of nature are independent of the observer´s frame if it belongs to the class of frames obtained from each other by transformations of the Poincaré group.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Lecture 1: Spinors, Their Properties and Spinor Prodcuts
    2 Lecture 1: spinors, their properties and spinor prodcuts Consider a theory of a single massless Dirac fermion . The Lagrangian is = ¯ i@ˆ . (2.1) L ⇣ ⌘ The Dirac equation is i@ˆ =0, (2.2) which, in momentum space becomes pUˆ (p)=0, pVˆ (p)=0, (2.3) depending on whether we take positive-energy(particle) or negative-energy (anti-particle) solutions of the Dirac equation. Therefore, in the massless case no di↵erence appears in equations for paprticles and anti-particles. Finding one solution is therefore sufficient. The algebra is simplified if we take γ matrices in Weyl repreentation where µ µ 0 σ γ = µ . (2.4) " σ¯ 0 # and σµ =(1,~σ) andσ ¯µ =(1, ~ ). The Pauli matrices are − 01 0 i 10 σ = ,σ= − ,σ= . (2.5) 1 10 2 i 0 3 0 1 " # " # " − # The matrix γ5 is taken to be 10 γ5 = − . (2.6) " 01# We can use the matrix γ5 to construct projection operators on to upper and lower parts of the four-component spinors U and V . The projection operators are 1 γ 1+γ Pˆ = − 5 , Pˆ = 5 . (2.7) L 2 R 2 Let us write u (p) U(p)= L , (2.8) uR(p) ! where uL(p) and uR(p) are two-component spinors. Since µ 0 pµσ pˆ = µ , (2.9) " pµσ¯ 0(p) # andpU ˆ (p) = 0, the two-component spinors satisfy the following (Weyl) equations µ µ pµσ uR(p)=0,pµσ¯ uL(p)=0. (2.10) –3– Suppose that we have a left handed spinor uL(p) that satisfies the Weyl equation.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields
    7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields 7.1 The Dirac Equation and Quantum Field Theory The Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation which describes the quantum dynamics of spinors. We will see in this section that a consistent description of this theory cannot be done outside the framework of (local) relativistic Quantum Field Theory. The Dirac Equation (i∂/ m)ψ =0 ψ¯(i∂/ + m) = 0 (1) − can be regarded as the equations of motion of a complex field ψ. Much as in the case of the scalar field, and also in close analogy to the theory of non-relativistic many particle systems discussed in the last chapter, the Dirac field is an operator which acts on a Fock space. We have already discussed that the Dirac equation also follows from a least-action-principle. Indeed the Lagrangian i µ = [ψ¯∂ψ/ (∂µψ¯)γ ψ] mψψ¯ ψ¯(i∂/ m)ψ (2) L 2 − − ≡ − has the Dirac equation for its equation of motion. Also, the momentum Πα(x) canonically conjugate to ψα(x) is ψ δ † Πα(x)= L = iψα (3) δ∂0ψα(x) Thus, they obey the equal-time Poisson Brackets ψ 3 ψα(~x), Π (~y) P B = iδαβδ (~x ~y) (4) { β } − Thus † 3 ψα(~x), ψ (~y) P B = δαβδ (~x ~y) (5) { β } − † In other words the field ψα and its adjoint ψα are a canonical pair. This result follows from the fact that the Dirac Lagrangian is first order in time derivatives. Notice that the field theory of non-relativistic many-particle systems (for both fermions on bosons) also has a Lagrangian which is first order in time derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Connection Between the Solutions to the Dirac and Weyl
    On the connection between the solutions to the Dirac and Weyl equations and the corresponding electromagnetic 4-potentials Aristides I. Kechriniotis ∗ Christos A. Tsonos † Konstantinos K. Delibasis ‡ Georgios N. Tsigaridas§ September 14, 2019 Abstract In this paper we study in detail the connection between the solutions to the Dirac and Weyl equation and the associated electromagnetic 4- potentials. First, it is proven that all solutions to the Weyl equations are degenerate, in the sense that they correspond to an infinite number of electromagnetic 4-potentials. As far as the solutions to the Dirac equa- tion are concerned, it is shown that they can be classified into two classes. The elements of the first class correspond to one and only one 4-potential, and are called non-degenerate Dirac solutions. On the other hand, the ele- ments of the second class correspond to an infinite number of 4-potentials, and are called degenerate Dirac solutions. Further, it is proven that at least two of these 4-potentials are gauge-inequivalent, corresponding to different electromagnetic fields. In order to illustrate this particularly im- portant result we have studied the degenerate solutions to the force-free Dirac equation and shown that they correspond to massless particles. We have also provided explicit examples regarding solutions to the force-free Weyl equation and the Weyl equation for a constant magnetic field. In all cases we have calculated the infinite number of different electromagnetic fields corresponding to these solutions. arXiv:1208.2546v10 [math-ph] 15 Sep 2019 PACS: 03.65.Pm, 03.50.De, 41.20.-q ∗General Department, University of Thessaly, GR-35100 Lamia, Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Equations Greiner Greiner Quantum Mechanics Mechanics I an Introduction 3Rd Edition (In Preparation)
    W Greiner RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM MECHANICS Wave Equations Greiner Greiner Quantum Mechanics Mechanics I An Introduction 3rd Edition (in preparation) Greiner Greiner Quantum Theory Mechanics II Special Chapters (in preparation) (in preparation) Greiner Greiner· Muller Electrodynamics Quantum Mechanics (in preparation) Symmetries 2nd Edition Greiner· Neise . StOcker Greiner Thermodynamics Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Statistical Mechanics Wave Equations Greiner· Reinhardt Field Quantization (in preparation) Greiner . Reinhardt Quantum Electrodynamics 2nd Edition Greiner· Schafer Quantum Chromodynamics Greiner· Maruhn Nuclear Models (in preparation) Greiner· MUller Gauge Theory of Weak Interactions Walter Greiner RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM MECHANICS Wave Equations With a Foreword by D. A. Bromley With 62 Figures, and 89 Worked Examples and Exercises Springer Professor Dr. Walter Greiner Institut fiir Theoretische Physik der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt Postfach 111932 D-60054 Frankfurt am Main Germany Street address: Robert-Mayer-Strasse 8-\ 0 D-60325 Frankfurt am Main Germany ISBN 978-3-540-99535-7 ISBN 978-3-642-88082-7 (eBook) DOl 10.1007/978-3-642-88082-7 Title of the original German edition: Theoretische Physik, Band 6: Relativistische Quantenmechanik, 2., iiberarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage 1987 © Verlag Harri Deutsch, Thun 1981 1st Edition 1990 3rd printing 1995 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer­ Verlag.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Renormalization and Integrability Within the Massive Neutrinos Modela
    Apeiron, Vol. 17, No. 4, October 2010 243 Energy renormalization and integrability within the massive neutrinos modela Lukasz Andrzej Glinka E-mail address: [email protected] In this paper the massive neutrinos model arising due to the Snyder noncommutative geometry, proposed recently by the author is partially developed. By straightforward calculation it is shown that the masses of the chiral left- and right-handed Weyl fields treated as parameters fixed by experiments, lead to the consistent physical picture of the noncommutative geometry, and consequently yield up- per and lower energy limitations of a relativistic particle and exact integrability within the proposed model. This feature of the model in itself both defines and emphasizes its significance and possible usefulness for both theory as well as phenomenology for high energy physics and astro- physics. Basing on the model we discuss also the spacial case within the model describing ultra-relativistic neutri- nos. Keywords: models of neutrino mass ; noncommutative ge- ometry models ; Snyder noncommutative geometry ; en- ergy renormalization ; exactly integrable systems ; Planck scale effects ; ultra-relativistic neutrinos ; Weyl equation ; Dirac equation aFirst e-print notes were prepared during author's Se- nior Research Fellowship January-June 2009 at Interna- tional Institute for Applicable Mathematics & Information Sciences, Hyderabad (India) & Udine (Italy), B.M. Birla Science Centre, Adarsh Nagar, 500 063 Hyderabad, India c 2010 C. Roy Keys Inc. { http://redshift.vif.com Apeiron, Vol. 17, No. 4, October 2010 244 Introduction It was established recently by the author that the Dirac equation modified by the γ5-term arising due to the Snyder noncommutative geometry model, yields the conventional Dirac theory with nonhermitian mass, or equivalently to the massive neutrinos model given by the Weyl equation with a diagonal and hermitian mass matrix.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Quaternionic Wave Equation
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS 47, 122301 ͑2006͒ Relativistic quaternionic wave equation ͒ Charles Schwartza Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 ͑Received 22 September 2006; accepted 19 October 2006; published online 1 December 2006͒ We study a one-component quaternionic wave equation which is relativistically covariant. Bilinear forms include a conserved four-vector current and an antisym- metric second rank tensor. Waves propagate within the light cone and there is a conserved quantity which looks like helicity. The principle of superposition is re- tained in a slightly altered manner. External potentials can be introduced in a way that allows for gauge invariance. There are some results for scattering theory and for two-particle wave functions as well as the beginnings of second quantization. However, we are unable to find a suitable Lagrangian or an energy-momentum tensor. © 2006 American Institute of Physics. ͓DOI: 10.1063/1.2397555͔ I. INTRODUCTION Many attempts have been made to consider the extension of the usual quantum theory, based on the field of complex numbers, to quaternions. The 1936 paper by Birkhoff and von Neumann1 opened the door to this possibility, and the 1995 book by Adler2 covers many aspects that have been studied. Here is a wave equation that appears to have escaped previous recognition: ␺ץ ١␺ + m␺j. ͑1.1͒ · i = u tץ The single wave function ␺ is a function of the space time coordinates x,t. The usual elementary quaternions i, j,k, are defined by i2 = j2 = k2 = ijk =−1 ͑1.2͒ and ץ ץ ץ i + j + k .
    [Show full text]
  • Gauge Theory
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION 2018 Gauge Theory David Tong Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 OBA, UK http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/gaugetheory.html [email protected] Contents 0. Introduction 1 1. Topics in Electromagnetism 3 1.1 Magnetic Monopoles 3 1.1.1 Dirac Quantisation 4 1.1.2 A Patchwork of Gauge Fields 6 1.1.3 Monopoles and Angular Momentum 8 1.2 The Theta Term 10 1.2.1 The Topological Insulator 11 1.2.2 A Mirage Monopole 14 1.2.3 The Witten Effect 16 1.2.4 Why θ is Periodic 18 1.2.5 Parity, Time-Reversal and θ = π 21 1.3 Further Reading 22 2. Yang-Mills Theory 26 2.1 Introducing Yang-Mills 26 2.1.1 The Action 29 2.1.2 Gauge Symmetry 31 2.1.3 Wilson Lines and Wilson Loops 33 2.2 The Theta Term 38 2.2.1 Canonical Quantisation of Yang-Mills 40 2.2.2 The Wavefunction and the Chern-Simons Functional 42 2.2.3 Analogies From Quantum Mechanics 47 2.3 Instantons 51 2.3.1 The Self-Dual Yang-Mills Equations 52 2.3.2 Tunnelling: Another Quantum Mechanics Analogy 56 2.3.3 Instanton Contributions to the Path Integral 58 2.4 The Flow to Strong Coupling 61 2.4.1 Anti-Screening and Paramagnetism 65 2.4.2 Computing the Beta Function 67 2.5 Electric Probes 74 2.5.1 Coulomb vs Confining 74 2.5.2 An Analogy: Flux Lines in a Superconductor 78 { 1 { 2.5.3 Wilson Loops Revisited 85 2.6 Magnetic Probes 88 2.6.1 't Hooft Lines 89 2.6.2 SU(N) vs SU(N)=ZN 92 2.6.3 What is the Gauge Group of the Standard Model? 97 2.7 Dynamical Matter 99 2.7.1 The Beta Function Revisited 100 2.7.2 The Infra-Red Phases of QCD-like Theories 102 2.7.3 The Higgs vs Confining Phase 105 2.8 't Hooft-Polyakov Monopoles 109 2.8.1 Monopole Solutions 112 2.8.2 The Witten Effect Again 114 2.9 Further Reading 115 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1911.10910V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph]
    Real wave equations, spin origin of charge, and outlook on particle physics S. C. Tiwari Department of Physics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, and Institute of Natural Philosophy Varanasi India Radical revision on the conventional spacetime picture, illusion or emergent phenomenon, has been the focus of the speculations on the unified frameworks for fundamental interactions in nature. Compared to strong experimental credence to the standard model of particle physics there is prac- tically no relation of these speculations with the world of real particles. In this paper we present a new conceptual framework for particle physics in which nontrivial geometry and topology of space and time have fundamental reality. To develop this model we proceed with the analysis of the stan- 0 1 dard wave equations and make them real using the transformation rule i = √ 1 C = . − → 1 0 Topological significance is attached to i in terms of a point defect in 1D directed line. New− inter- pretation of Schroedinger wave equation and Z2 vortex throw light on the nature of spin. A new meaning is also obtained on U(1) gauge symmetry and charge. Novel properties of C-matrix and known applications are presented. Topological origin of spin is inferred from the interpretation of Pauli algebra that they signify 2D directed area in phase space as topological obstruction. Elec- tron magnetic moment decomposition in QED serves the basis for the proposition: spin origin of charge (SOC). A dynamical logarithmic spiral geometric structure comprising of 2+1D braids, 3 vortices with associated three 2-spinors is envisaged based on SOC.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirac and Weyl Equations on a Lattice As Quantum Cellular
    View metadata, citation andDirac similar and papers Weyl at core.ac.uk Equations on a Lattice as Quantum Cellular Automata brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Iwo Bialynicki-Birula Centrum Fizyki Teoretycznej PAN ∗ Lotnik´ow 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland and Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universit¨at Robert-Mayer-Strasse 8-10, Frankfurt am Main, Germany A discretized time evolution of the wave function for a Dirac particle on a cubic lattice is represented by a very simple quantum cellular automaton. In each evolution step the updated value of the wave function at a given site depends only on the values at the nearest sites, the evolution is unitary and preserves chiral symmetry. Moreover, it is shown that the relationship between Dirac particles and cellular automata operating on two component objects on a lattice is indeed very close. Every local and unitary automaton on a cubic lattice, under some natural assumptions, leads in the continuum limit to the Weyl equation. The sum over histories is evaluated and its connection with path integrals and theories of fermions on a lattice is outlined. PACS numbers: 11.10.Qr, 11.15.Ha, 02.70.+d The aim of this paper is to present a very simple lattice algorithm that reproduces in the continuum limit the prop- agation of massless or massive Dirac particles. The discretized time evolution described here satisfies the fundamental physical requirements of locality (the updated value of the wave function at a given site depends only on the values at the neighboring sites), unitarity (the norm of the wave function is preserved), and chiral symmetry (independent propagation of two helicity states).
    [Show full text]
  • The Solutions of Dirac Equation on the Hyperboloid Under Perpendicular Magnetic Fields
    The solutions of Dirac equation on the hyperboloid under perpendicular magnetic fields Duygu Demir Kızılırmak1 and Şengül Kuru2 1 Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey 2 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey E-mail: 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] Abstract In this study, firstly it is reviewed how the solutions of the Dirac-Weyl equation for a massless charge on the hyperboloid under perpendicular magnetic fields are obtained by using supersymmetric (SUSY) quantum mechanics methods. Then, the solutions of the Dirac equation for a massive charge under magnetic fields have been computed in terms of the solutions which were found before for the Dirac-Weyl equation. As an example, the case of a constant magnetic field on the hyperbolic surface for massless and massive charges has been worked out. Keywords: Dirac equation, Dirac-Weyl equation, supersymmetric methods, hyperbolic surface 1. Introduction While in non-relativistic quantum mechanics the spin-0 particles are described by the Schrödinger equation, in relativistic quantum mechanics the scalar particles are described by Klein-Gordon equation, the spin-½ particles by means of Dirac equation, and massless spin-½ particles by the Dirac-Weyl equation [1, 2]. Here, we will consider both Dirac and Dirac-Weyl equations. But we will see that in this process we must also solve some related effective Schrödinger equations. Graphene has received much attention in the last years not only in condensed matter but also in theoretical physics [3]. In graphene, charged quasi-particles are described by the Dirac-Weyl equation [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes Are Based on a Series of Lectures Given by Myself from April to June 2009 in the School of Mathematics at Trinity College, Dublin
    Introduction to Supersymmetry Christian SÄamann Notes by Anton Ilderton August 24, 2009 1 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 A SUSY toy model ............................... 5 1.2 What is it good for? .............................. 10 2 Spinors 12 2.1 The Poincar¶egroup .............................. 12 2.2 Spin and pin groups .............................. 18 2.3 Summary .................................... 22 3 The SUSY algebra 24 3.1 SUSY algebra on R1;3 ............................. 24 3.2 Representations ................................. 25 3.3 The Wess{Zumino model ........................... 28 4 Superspace and super¯elds 32 4.1 Reminder: Gra¼mann numbers. ........................ 32 4.2 Flat superspace ................................. 33 4.3 Super¯elds ................................... 35 5 SUSY{invariant actions from super¯elds 38 5.1 Actions from chiral s¯elds ........................... 38 5.2 Actions with vector super¯elds ........................ 42 6 SUSY quantum ¯eld theories 49 6.1 Abstract considerations ............................ 49 6.2 S¯eld quantisation of chiral s¯elds ...................... 51 6.3 Quantisation of Super Yang{Mills theory . 58 7 Maximally SUSY Yang{Mills theories 63 7.1 Spinors in arbitrary dimensions ........................ 63 7.2 Actions and constraint equations ....................... 64 7.3 d = 4, N = 4 super Yang{Mills theory .................... 67 8 Seiberg-Witten Theory 72 8.1 The moduli space of pure N = 2 SYM theory . 72 8.2 Duality ..................................... 74 8.3 The exact e®ective action ........................... 75 A Conventions and identities 78 B Solutions to exercises 81 2 Preface Supersymmetry, or SUSY for short, is an extension of the classical symmetries of ¯eld theories. SUSY was discovered in the early 1970's and has attracted growing attention ever since, even though there is still no experimental evidence for its existence up to this day.
    [Show full text]