Lecture Notes Are Based on a Series of Lectures Given by Myself from April to June 2009 in the School of Mathematics at Trinity College, Dublin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lecture Notes Are Based on a Series of Lectures Given by Myself from April to June 2009 in the School of Mathematics at Trinity College, Dublin Introduction to Supersymmetry Christian SÄamann Notes by Anton Ilderton August 24, 2009 1 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 A SUSY toy model ............................... 5 1.2 What is it good for? .............................. 10 2 Spinors 12 2.1 The Poincar¶egroup .............................. 12 2.2 Spin and pin groups .............................. 18 2.3 Summary .................................... 22 3 The SUSY algebra 24 3.1 SUSY algebra on R1;3 ............................. 24 3.2 Representations ................................. 25 3.3 The Wess{Zumino model ........................... 28 4 Superspace and super¯elds 32 4.1 Reminder: Gra¼mann numbers. ........................ 32 4.2 Flat superspace ................................. 33 4.3 Super¯elds ................................... 35 5 SUSY{invariant actions from super¯elds 38 5.1 Actions from chiral s¯elds ........................... 38 5.2 Actions with vector super¯elds ........................ 42 6 SUSY quantum ¯eld theories 49 6.1 Abstract considerations ............................ 49 6.2 S¯eld quantisation of chiral s¯elds ...................... 51 6.3 Quantisation of Super Yang{Mills theory . 58 7 Maximally SUSY Yang{Mills theories 63 7.1 Spinors in arbitrary dimensions ........................ 63 7.2 Actions and constraint equations ....................... 64 7.3 d = 4, N = 4 super Yang{Mills theory .................... 67 8 Seiberg-Witten Theory 72 8.1 The moduli space of pure N = 2 SYM theory . 72 8.2 Duality ..................................... 74 8.3 The exact e®ective action ........................... 75 A Conventions and identities 78 B Solutions to exercises 81 2 Preface Supersymmetry, or SUSY for short, is an extension of the classical symmetries of ¯eld theories. SUSY was discovered in the early 1970's and has attracted growing attention ever since, even though there is still no experimental evidence for its existence up to this day. There are essentially two reasons why high-energy physicists keep interested in supersymmetry: From a phenomenological point of view, the supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model provides very reasonable solutions to some of the remaining puzzles in particle physics. On the other hand, supersymmetric ¯eld theories have many intriguing features which often can be accessed analytically, making them ideal toy models for theorists. These lecture notes are based on a series of lectures given by myself from April to June 2009 in the School of Mathematics at Trinity College, Dublin. The material covered in these notes was presented during eleven lectures, each lasting 90 mins, which was a little ambitious, retrospectively. The aim of the lectures was to give a reasonable overview of this topic while being thorough enough to provide a graduate student with the necessary tools to do research involving supersymmetric ¯eld theories herself. I put some emphasis on motivating spinors, as I still remember struggling with the reasons for their existence when I ¯rst encountered them. Besides the standard material presented in almost any course on supersymmetry, I chose super¯eld quantisation, maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories and Seiberg-Witten theory as additional topics for these lectures. I had just used supergraphs in a research project myself and their usefulness and simplicity was still fresh in my mind. The maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories with their amazing properties were included because of the important role they play in string theory today. Finally, the section on Seiberg-Witten theory demonstrates why supersymmetric ¯eld theories are indeed beautiful toy models. If you should ¯nd any typos or mistakes in the text, please let us know by sending an email to [email protected] or [email protected]. The most recent version of these lecture notes can be found on the lecture series homepage, http://www.christiansaemann.de/supersymmetry.html . On this webpage, there is also a (still preliminary) version of a Mathematica notebook which performs many of the tedious computations necessary for understanding these lectures automatically. I am very grateful to Anton Ilderton for doing such an amazing job with writing up these notes, correcting prefactors and providing typed-up solutions to all the steps left as exercises during the lectures. I would also like to thank all the people attending the lectures at Trinity for making them more interesting and lively by asking questions. Christian SÄamann 3 General remarks Our metric is (¡; +; +; +), which di®ers by a sign from the metric of most quantum ¯eld theory textbooks, as e.g. Peskin{Schroeder. The remainder of our conventions are introduced in the text, as they are needed. A summary is included in the appendices. Numerous exercises are included, the intent of which is mainly to make the user familiar with the kind of methods, tricks and identities needed to perform SUSY calculations. Full solutions can be found in the appendices. Recommended textbooks and lecture notes (with metric conventions) Recall that the two di®erent choices for Minkowski metric, the mostly plus (¡; +; +; +) and the mostly minus (+; ¡; ¡; ¡), are often referred to as the East Coast Metric (ECM) and the West Coast Metric (WCM), respectively. [1] J. Wess and J. Bagger, \Supersymmetry and supergravity", Princeton, USA: Univ. Pr. (1992) 259 p. ECM, the essentials. [2] S. Weinberg, \The quantum theory of ¯elds. Vol. 3: Supersymmetry", Cambridge, UK: Univ. Pr. (2000) 419 p. ECM, uses Dirac spinors, more physics. [3] I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, \Ideas and methods of supersymmetry and supergravity: Or a walk through superspace", Bristol, UK: IOP (1998) 656 p. ECM, supermathematics, NR theorems, super Feynman rules. [4] S. J. Gates, Marcus T. Grisaru, M. Rocek and W. Siegel, \Superspace, or one thousand and one lessons in supersymmetry," Front. Phys. 58 (1983) 1 [hep- th/0108200]. ECM, many useful things, in particular super Feynman rules. [5] A. Van Proeyen, \Tools for supersymmetry", arXiv:hep-th/9910030. ECM, more algebraic. [6] S. P. Martin, \A Supersymmetry Primer", arXiv:hep-ph/9709356. ECM, particle physics, MSSM. [7] A. Bilal, \Introduction to supersymmetry", arXiv:hep-th/0101055. WCM, for particle physics conventions. [8] J. D. Lykken, \Introduction to supersymmetry", arXiv:hep-th/9612114. WCM, useful as a reference. Cover: an otter, and it's supersymmetric partner, the sotter. 4 1 Introduction 1.1 A SUSY toy model At the beginning of the 1970's, people started looking at SUSY toy models. In this sec- tion we will discuss a simple model which will illustrate many of the important physical properties of SUSY theories which are commonly discussed in a ¯eld theory context. It will also serve to illustrate the fundamentals of many calculations we will later perform in ¯eld theory, in a simple and accessible setting. Much of the following discussion can be found in [9, 10] in more detail. x1 De¯nition. Our model is quantum mechanical. We have a hermitian Hamiltonian H and non{hermitian operators Q, Qy related through the anti{commutator 1 1 H = fQ; Qyg ´ (QQy + QyQ) ; (1) 2 2 where the operators obey the following \0 + 1 dimensional SUSY algebra", fQ; Qg = fQy;Qyg = 0 (2) [Q; H] = [Qy;H] = 0 : The Q and Qy are called supercharges and generate supersymmetry transformations. We always count real supercharges, so here we have two of them. It is a direct consequence 2 y2 of (2) that Q = Q = 0. ¡ ¢ x2 Properties. Consider a Hilbert space H; h j i carrying a representation of H, Q and Qy. From the algebra (2), it follows that H is positive de¯nite, for, given any state j ª i 2 H, 2h ª jHj ª i = h ª jfQ; Qygj ª i = h ª jQQyj ª i + h ª jQyQj ª i (3) = kQj ª ik2 + kQyj ª ik2 ¸ 0 : We see that states in a SUSY theory have non{negative energy; note that the minimum may or may not be obtained. To further examine the state space, we diagonalise H and consider the eigenstates j n i such that Hj n i = Enj n i: (4) We must treat the two cases En = 0 and En > 0 separately. Wep begin with thep case y y En = E > 0. We may here introduce the scaled operators a = Q= 2E and a = Q = 2E which, within the space of states of energy E, obey the algebra fa; ayg = 1 ; fa; ag = fay; ayg = 0 : (5) This is a simple example of a Cli®ord algebra, which we will study later on. We now construct all the states with energy E, in analogy to the construction of harmonic 5 oscillator states via creation operators acting on the vacuum. Again, we clearly have a2 = ay2 = 0, from which it follows that the only eigenvalue of a is 0. Call the state with this eigenvalue j ¡ i. We can create no more states by acting on this with a, and we can create only one more by acting with ay (since ay2 = 0), which we call j + i ´ ayj ¡ i. Hence we have a subsystem of two states obeying ayj ¡ i = j + i ; aj + i = j ¡ i ; aj ¡ i = ayj + i = 0 : A simple 2d representation of the algebra (5) is given by the following matrices and vectors, Ã ! Ã ! Ã ! Ã ! 0 0 0 1 1 0 a = ; ay = ; j + i = ; j ¡ i = : (6) 1 0 0 0 0 1 We see here a basic example of the existence of two types of states in SUSY theories; `+' states and `¡' states which will later be bosons and fermions. They are transformed into each other by the action of the SUSY generators, and more generally we will see that Qj boson i = j fermion i ;Qj fermion i = j boson i ; and similarly for the action of Qy. We also have an example of the SUSY property that states of non{zero energy are degenerate and appear in pairs; a possible non{zero spectrum of a SUSY theory is sketched in Fig.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Introduction 2 Klein Gordon Equation
    Thimo Preis 1 1 Introduction Non-relativistic quantum mechanics refers to the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics applied in the context of Galilean relativity, more specifically quantizing the equations from the Hamiltonian formalism of non-relativistic Classical Mechanics by replacing dynamical variables by operators through the correspondence principle. Therefore, the physical properties predicted by the Schrödinger theory are invariant in a Galilean change of referential, but they do not have the invariance under a Lorentz change of referential required by the principle of relativity. In particular, all phenomena concerning the interaction between light and matter, such as emission, absorption or scattering of photons, is outside the framework of non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics. One of the main difficulties in elaborating relativistic Quantum Mechanics comes from the fact that the law of conservation of the number of particles ceases in general to be true. Due to the equivalence of mass and energy there can be creation or absorption of particles whenever the interactions give rise to energy transfers equal or superior to the rest massses of these particles. This theory, which i am about to present to you, is not exempt of difficulties, but it accounts for a very large body of experimental facts. We will base our deductions upon the six axioms of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics.Therefore, with the principles of quantum mechanics and of relativistic invariance at our disposal we will try to construct a Lorentz covariant wave equation. For this we need special relativity. 1.1 Special Relativity Special relativity states that the laws of nature are independent of the observer´s frame if it belongs to the class of frames obtained from each other by transformations of the Poincaré group.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Lecture 1: Spinors, Their Properties and Spinor Prodcuts
    2 Lecture 1: spinors, their properties and spinor prodcuts Consider a theory of a single massless Dirac fermion . The Lagrangian is = ¯ i@ˆ . (2.1) L ⇣ ⌘ The Dirac equation is i@ˆ =0, (2.2) which, in momentum space becomes pUˆ (p)=0, pVˆ (p)=0, (2.3) depending on whether we take positive-energy(particle) or negative-energy (anti-particle) solutions of the Dirac equation. Therefore, in the massless case no di↵erence appears in equations for paprticles and anti-particles. Finding one solution is therefore sufficient. The algebra is simplified if we take γ matrices in Weyl repreentation where µ µ 0 σ γ = µ . (2.4) " σ¯ 0 # and σµ =(1,~σ) andσ ¯µ =(1, ~ ). The Pauli matrices are − 01 0 i 10 σ = ,σ= − ,σ= . (2.5) 1 10 2 i 0 3 0 1 " # " # " − # The matrix γ5 is taken to be 10 γ5 = − . (2.6) " 01# We can use the matrix γ5 to construct projection operators on to upper and lower parts of the four-component spinors U and V . The projection operators are 1 γ 1+γ Pˆ = − 5 , Pˆ = 5 . (2.7) L 2 R 2 Let us write u (p) U(p)= L , (2.8) uR(p) ! where uL(p) and uR(p) are two-component spinors. Since µ 0 pµσ pˆ = µ , (2.9) " pµσ¯ 0(p) # andpU ˆ (p) = 0, the two-component spinors satisfy the following (Weyl) equations µ µ pµσ uR(p)=0,pµσ¯ uL(p)=0. (2.10) –3– Suppose that we have a left handed spinor uL(p) that satisfies the Weyl equation.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields
    7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields 7.1 The Dirac Equation and Quantum Field Theory The Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation which describes the quantum dynamics of spinors. We will see in this section that a consistent description of this theory cannot be done outside the framework of (local) relativistic Quantum Field Theory. The Dirac Equation (i∂/ m)ψ =0 ψ¯(i∂/ + m) = 0 (1) − can be regarded as the equations of motion of a complex field ψ. Much as in the case of the scalar field, and also in close analogy to the theory of non-relativistic many particle systems discussed in the last chapter, the Dirac field is an operator which acts on a Fock space. We have already discussed that the Dirac equation also follows from a least-action-principle. Indeed the Lagrangian i µ = [ψ¯∂ψ/ (∂µψ¯)γ ψ] mψψ¯ ψ¯(i∂/ m)ψ (2) L 2 − − ≡ − has the Dirac equation for its equation of motion. Also, the momentum Πα(x) canonically conjugate to ψα(x) is ψ δ † Πα(x)= L = iψα (3) δ∂0ψα(x) Thus, they obey the equal-time Poisson Brackets ψ 3 ψα(~x), Π (~y) P B = iδαβδ (~x ~y) (4) { β } − Thus † 3 ψα(~x), ψ (~y) P B = δαβδ (~x ~y) (5) { β } − † In other words the field ψα and its adjoint ψα are a canonical pair. This result follows from the fact that the Dirac Lagrangian is first order in time derivatives. Notice that the field theory of non-relativistic many-particle systems (for both fermions on bosons) also has a Lagrangian which is first order in time derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Connection Between the Solutions to the Dirac and Weyl
    On the connection between the solutions to the Dirac and Weyl equations and the corresponding electromagnetic 4-potentials Aristides I. Kechriniotis ∗ Christos A. Tsonos † Konstantinos K. Delibasis ‡ Georgios N. Tsigaridas§ September 14, 2019 Abstract In this paper we study in detail the connection between the solutions to the Dirac and Weyl equation and the associated electromagnetic 4- potentials. First, it is proven that all solutions to the Weyl equations are degenerate, in the sense that they correspond to an infinite number of electromagnetic 4-potentials. As far as the solutions to the Dirac equa- tion are concerned, it is shown that they can be classified into two classes. The elements of the first class correspond to one and only one 4-potential, and are called non-degenerate Dirac solutions. On the other hand, the ele- ments of the second class correspond to an infinite number of 4-potentials, and are called degenerate Dirac solutions. Further, it is proven that at least two of these 4-potentials are gauge-inequivalent, corresponding to different electromagnetic fields. In order to illustrate this particularly im- portant result we have studied the degenerate solutions to the force-free Dirac equation and shown that they correspond to massless particles. We have also provided explicit examples regarding solutions to the force-free Weyl equation and the Weyl equation for a constant magnetic field. In all cases we have calculated the infinite number of different electromagnetic fields corresponding to these solutions. arXiv:1208.2546v10 [math-ph] 15 Sep 2019 PACS: 03.65.Pm, 03.50.De, 41.20.-q ∗General Department, University of Thessaly, GR-35100 Lamia, Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Equations Greiner Greiner Quantum Mechanics Mechanics I an Introduction 3Rd Edition (In Preparation)
    W Greiner RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM MECHANICS Wave Equations Greiner Greiner Quantum Mechanics Mechanics I An Introduction 3rd Edition (in preparation) Greiner Greiner Quantum Theory Mechanics II Special Chapters (in preparation) (in preparation) Greiner Greiner· Muller Electrodynamics Quantum Mechanics (in preparation) Symmetries 2nd Edition Greiner· Neise . StOcker Greiner Thermodynamics Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Statistical Mechanics Wave Equations Greiner· Reinhardt Field Quantization (in preparation) Greiner . Reinhardt Quantum Electrodynamics 2nd Edition Greiner· Schafer Quantum Chromodynamics Greiner· Maruhn Nuclear Models (in preparation) Greiner· MUller Gauge Theory of Weak Interactions Walter Greiner RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM MECHANICS Wave Equations With a Foreword by D. A. Bromley With 62 Figures, and 89 Worked Examples and Exercises Springer Professor Dr. Walter Greiner Institut fiir Theoretische Physik der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt Postfach 111932 D-60054 Frankfurt am Main Germany Street address: Robert-Mayer-Strasse 8-\ 0 D-60325 Frankfurt am Main Germany ISBN 978-3-540-99535-7 ISBN 978-3-642-88082-7 (eBook) DOl 10.1007/978-3-642-88082-7 Title of the original German edition: Theoretische Physik, Band 6: Relativistische Quantenmechanik, 2., iiberarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage 1987 © Verlag Harri Deutsch, Thun 1981 1st Edition 1990 3rd printing 1995 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer­ Verlag.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Renormalization and Integrability Within the Massive Neutrinos Modela
    Apeiron, Vol. 17, No. 4, October 2010 243 Energy renormalization and integrability within the massive neutrinos modela Lukasz Andrzej Glinka E-mail address: [email protected] In this paper the massive neutrinos model arising due to the Snyder noncommutative geometry, proposed recently by the author is partially developed. By straightforward calculation it is shown that the masses of the chiral left- and right-handed Weyl fields treated as parameters fixed by experiments, lead to the consistent physical picture of the noncommutative geometry, and consequently yield up- per and lower energy limitations of a relativistic particle and exact integrability within the proposed model. This feature of the model in itself both defines and emphasizes its significance and possible usefulness for both theory as well as phenomenology for high energy physics and astro- physics. Basing on the model we discuss also the spacial case within the model describing ultra-relativistic neutri- nos. Keywords: models of neutrino mass ; noncommutative ge- ometry models ; Snyder noncommutative geometry ; en- ergy renormalization ; exactly integrable systems ; Planck scale effects ; ultra-relativistic neutrinos ; Weyl equation ; Dirac equation aFirst e-print notes were prepared during author's Se- nior Research Fellowship January-June 2009 at Interna- tional Institute for Applicable Mathematics & Information Sciences, Hyderabad (India) & Udine (Italy), B.M. Birla Science Centre, Adarsh Nagar, 500 063 Hyderabad, India c 2010 C. Roy Keys Inc. { http://redshift.vif.com Apeiron, Vol. 17, No. 4, October 2010 244 Introduction It was established recently by the author that the Dirac equation modified by the γ5-term arising due to the Snyder noncommutative geometry model, yields the conventional Dirac theory with nonhermitian mass, or equivalently to the massive neutrinos model given by the Weyl equation with a diagonal and hermitian mass matrix.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Quaternionic Wave Equation
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS 47, 122301 ͑2006͒ Relativistic quaternionic wave equation ͒ Charles Schwartza Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 ͑Received 22 September 2006; accepted 19 October 2006; published online 1 December 2006͒ We study a one-component quaternionic wave equation which is relativistically covariant. Bilinear forms include a conserved four-vector current and an antisym- metric second rank tensor. Waves propagate within the light cone and there is a conserved quantity which looks like helicity. The principle of superposition is re- tained in a slightly altered manner. External potentials can be introduced in a way that allows for gauge invariance. There are some results for scattering theory and for two-particle wave functions as well as the beginnings of second quantization. However, we are unable to find a suitable Lagrangian or an energy-momentum tensor. © 2006 American Institute of Physics. ͓DOI: 10.1063/1.2397555͔ I. INTRODUCTION Many attempts have been made to consider the extension of the usual quantum theory, based on the field of complex numbers, to quaternions. The 1936 paper by Birkhoff and von Neumann1 opened the door to this possibility, and the 1995 book by Adler2 covers many aspects that have been studied. Here is a wave equation that appears to have escaped previous recognition: ␺ץ ١␺ + m␺j. ͑1.1͒ · i = u tץ The single wave function ␺ is a function of the space time coordinates x,t. The usual elementary quaternions i, j,k, are defined by i2 = j2 = k2 = ijk =−1 ͑1.2͒ and ץ ץ ץ i + j + k .
    [Show full text]
  • Gauge Theory
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION 2018 Gauge Theory David Tong Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 OBA, UK http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/gaugetheory.html [email protected] Contents 0. Introduction 1 1. Topics in Electromagnetism 3 1.1 Magnetic Monopoles 3 1.1.1 Dirac Quantisation 4 1.1.2 A Patchwork of Gauge Fields 6 1.1.3 Monopoles and Angular Momentum 8 1.2 The Theta Term 10 1.2.1 The Topological Insulator 11 1.2.2 A Mirage Monopole 14 1.2.3 The Witten Effect 16 1.2.4 Why θ is Periodic 18 1.2.5 Parity, Time-Reversal and θ = π 21 1.3 Further Reading 22 2. Yang-Mills Theory 26 2.1 Introducing Yang-Mills 26 2.1.1 The Action 29 2.1.2 Gauge Symmetry 31 2.1.3 Wilson Lines and Wilson Loops 33 2.2 The Theta Term 38 2.2.1 Canonical Quantisation of Yang-Mills 40 2.2.2 The Wavefunction and the Chern-Simons Functional 42 2.2.3 Analogies From Quantum Mechanics 47 2.3 Instantons 51 2.3.1 The Self-Dual Yang-Mills Equations 52 2.3.2 Tunnelling: Another Quantum Mechanics Analogy 56 2.3.3 Instanton Contributions to the Path Integral 58 2.4 The Flow to Strong Coupling 61 2.4.1 Anti-Screening and Paramagnetism 65 2.4.2 Computing the Beta Function 67 2.5 Electric Probes 74 2.5.1 Coulomb vs Confining 74 2.5.2 An Analogy: Flux Lines in a Superconductor 78 { 1 { 2.5.3 Wilson Loops Revisited 85 2.6 Magnetic Probes 88 2.6.1 't Hooft Lines 89 2.6.2 SU(N) vs SU(N)=ZN 92 2.6.3 What is the Gauge Group of the Standard Model? 97 2.7 Dynamical Matter 99 2.7.1 The Beta Function Revisited 100 2.7.2 The Infra-Red Phases of QCD-like Theories 102 2.7.3 The Higgs vs Confining Phase 105 2.8 't Hooft-Polyakov Monopoles 109 2.8.1 Monopole Solutions 112 2.8.2 The Witten Effect Again 114 2.9 Further Reading 115 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1911.10910V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph]
    Real wave equations, spin origin of charge, and outlook on particle physics S. C. Tiwari Department of Physics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, and Institute of Natural Philosophy Varanasi India Radical revision on the conventional spacetime picture, illusion or emergent phenomenon, has been the focus of the speculations on the unified frameworks for fundamental interactions in nature. Compared to strong experimental credence to the standard model of particle physics there is prac- tically no relation of these speculations with the world of real particles. In this paper we present a new conceptual framework for particle physics in which nontrivial geometry and topology of space and time have fundamental reality. To develop this model we proceed with the analysis of the stan- 0 1 dard wave equations and make them real using the transformation rule i = √ 1 C = . − → 1 0 Topological significance is attached to i in terms of a point defect in 1D directed line. New− inter- pretation of Schroedinger wave equation and Z2 vortex throw light on the nature of spin. A new meaning is also obtained on U(1) gauge symmetry and charge. Novel properties of C-matrix and known applications are presented. Topological origin of spin is inferred from the interpretation of Pauli algebra that they signify 2D directed area in phase space as topological obstruction. Elec- tron magnetic moment decomposition in QED serves the basis for the proposition: spin origin of charge (SOC). A dynamical logarithmic spiral geometric structure comprising of 2+1D braids, 3 vortices with associated three 2-spinors is envisaged based on SOC.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirac and Weyl Equations on a Lattice As Quantum Cellular
    View metadata, citation andDirac similar and papers Weyl at core.ac.uk Equations on a Lattice as Quantum Cellular Automata brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Iwo Bialynicki-Birula Centrum Fizyki Teoretycznej PAN ∗ Lotnik´ow 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland and Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universit¨at Robert-Mayer-Strasse 8-10, Frankfurt am Main, Germany A discretized time evolution of the wave function for a Dirac particle on a cubic lattice is represented by a very simple quantum cellular automaton. In each evolution step the updated value of the wave function at a given site depends only on the values at the nearest sites, the evolution is unitary and preserves chiral symmetry. Moreover, it is shown that the relationship between Dirac particles and cellular automata operating on two component objects on a lattice is indeed very close. Every local and unitary automaton on a cubic lattice, under some natural assumptions, leads in the continuum limit to the Weyl equation. The sum over histories is evaluated and its connection with path integrals and theories of fermions on a lattice is outlined. PACS numbers: 11.10.Qr, 11.15.Ha, 02.70.+d The aim of this paper is to present a very simple lattice algorithm that reproduces in the continuum limit the prop- agation of massless or massive Dirac particles. The discretized time evolution described here satisfies the fundamental physical requirements of locality (the updated value of the wave function at a given site depends only on the values at the neighboring sites), unitarity (the norm of the wave function is preserved), and chiral symmetry (independent propagation of two helicity states).
    [Show full text]
  • The Solutions of Dirac Equation on the Hyperboloid Under Perpendicular Magnetic Fields
    The solutions of Dirac equation on the hyperboloid under perpendicular magnetic fields Duygu Demir Kızılırmak1 and Şengül Kuru2 1 Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey 2 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey E-mail: 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] Abstract In this study, firstly it is reviewed how the solutions of the Dirac-Weyl equation for a massless charge on the hyperboloid under perpendicular magnetic fields are obtained by using supersymmetric (SUSY) quantum mechanics methods. Then, the solutions of the Dirac equation for a massive charge under magnetic fields have been computed in terms of the solutions which were found before for the Dirac-Weyl equation. As an example, the case of a constant magnetic field on the hyperbolic surface for massless and massive charges has been worked out. Keywords: Dirac equation, Dirac-Weyl equation, supersymmetric methods, hyperbolic surface 1. Introduction While in non-relativistic quantum mechanics the spin-0 particles are described by the Schrödinger equation, in relativistic quantum mechanics the scalar particles are described by Klein-Gordon equation, the spin-½ particles by means of Dirac equation, and massless spin-½ particles by the Dirac-Weyl equation [1, 2]. Here, we will consider both Dirac and Dirac-Weyl equations. But we will see that in this process we must also solve some related effective Schrödinger equations. Graphene has received much attention in the last years not only in condensed matter but also in theoretical physics [3]. In graphene, charged quasi-particles are described by the Dirac-Weyl equation [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1207.5234V3 [Cond-Mat.Str-El]
    Chiral anomaly, Charge Density Waves, and Axion Strings from Weyl Semimetals Zhong Wang1 and Shou-Cheng Zhang1,2 1 Institute for Advanced Study, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 100084 2 Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 We study dynamical instability and chiral symmetry breaking in three dimensional Weyl semimetals, which turns Weyl semimetals into “axion insulators”. Charge density waves (CDW) is found to be the natural conse- quence of the chiral symmetry breaking. The phase mode of this charge density wave state is identified as the axion, which couples to electromagnetic field in the topological θE B term. One of our main results is that the “axion strings” can be realized as the (screw or edge) dislocations in· the charge density wave, which provides a simple physical picture for the elusive axion strings. These axion strings carry gapless chiral modes, there- fore they have important implications for dissipationless transport properties of Weyl semimetals with broken symmetry. PACS numbers: 73.43.-f,71.70.Ej,75.70.Tj Introduction. Topological insulators are among the most as the chiral anomaly[11, 12, 23]. Unlike the topological in- active research fields in condensed matter physics recently[1– sulators, whose transport is dominated by topologically pro- 3]. Among the remarkable aspects of topological insulators tected surface states, in the Weyl semimetal the bulk transport is the ubiquitous role played by Dirac fermions. In fact, is most important. Their unique semi-metallic behaviors in 3d most of the recently discovered topological insulators can can potentially be engineered for semiconductor industry. be regarded as massive Dirac fermion systems with lattice Interaction effect plays a fundamental role in the dynam- regularization[3].
    [Show full text]