DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1911.10910V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1911.10910V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph] Real wave equations, spin origin of charge, and outlook on particle physics S. C. Tiwari Department of Physics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, and Institute of Natural Philosophy Varanasi India Radical revision on the conventional spacetime picture, illusion or emergent phenomenon, has been the focus of the speculations on the unified frameworks for fundamental interactions in nature. Compared to strong experimental credence to the standard model of particle physics there is prac- tically no relation of these speculations with the world of real particles. In this paper we present a new conceptual framework for particle physics in which nontrivial geometry and topology of space and time have fundamental reality. To develop this model we proceed with the analysis of the stan- 0 1 dard wave equations and make them real using the transformation rule i = √ 1 C = . − → 1 0 Topological significance is attached to i in terms of a point defect in 1D directed line. New− inter- pretation of Schroedinger wave equation and Z2 vortex throw light on the nature of spin. A new meaning is also obtained on U(1) gauge symmetry and charge. Novel properties of C-matrix and known applications are presented. Topological origin of spin is inferred from the interpretation of Pauli algebra that they signify 2D directed area in phase space as topological obstruction. Elec- tron magnetic moment decomposition in QED serves the basis for the proposition: spin origin of charge (SOC). A dynamical logarithmic spiral geometric structure comprising of 2+1D braids, 3 vortices with associated three 2-spinors is envisaged based on SOC. It is termed as meta-electron; meta-neutrino has 2-vortex structure. These are the only building blocks of all particles having the knotted vortex structures in our model. Coupling strengths of the three fundamental interactions are related with the magnitudes of the spin angular momentum of constituent spinors of the meta- electron. Unification has radically new paradigm compared to gauge theories: effective coupling constant with weight factors. To put the role of i in perspective a discussion on previous works is also presented. Outlook on particle physics is elaborated in this new framework. PACS numbers: 12.90.+b I. INTRODUCTION In the literature, quite often the relativistic wave equa- tion refers to quantum relativistic wave equations, e. g. The standard model in particle physics has enormous Dirac equation for the electron. experimental support. However alternative ideas and ex- In the nonrelativistic Schroedinger wave equation the tensions are being of great interest to break the per- distinct feature is the presence of both (¯h,i) that gives it ceived impasse in the unification goal. We investigate the mysterious characteristic [1], of course, the velocity real wave equations with a new approach in this paper: of light has no role in this equation that we write for free the main aim is to gain new insights on the nature of particle elementary particles and unification of their interactions. 2 ¯h 2 ∂Ψs Modern quantum field theories (QFTs) work in natural Ψs = i¯h (2) units ¯h = c = 1 such that for length and time one has − 2m∇ ∂t 1 the dimension of (mass)− . In contrast, physical inter- Relativistic Schroedinger equation or Klein-Gordon pretation of relativity and quantum mechanics crucially (KG) equation is a scalar relativistic wave equation for a depends on the explicit presence of c and ¯h respectively. particle with non-zero rest mass arXiv:1911.10910v1 [physics.gen-ph] 15 Nov 2019 Relativistic wave equation for a scalar, a vector, a spinor 1 ∂2Φ m2c4 and a tensor field, let us denote them by U (suppressing 2Φ = Φ (3) the indices) is given by ∇ − c2 ∂t2 ¯h2 Dirac equation for the electron is a first-order derivative 1 ∂2U ∂µ∂ U = 2U = 0 (1) wave equation for the Dirac spinor µ ∇ − c2 ∂t2 ∂Ψd Here the vacuum velocity of light c is an integral part of i¯h = i¯hc α. Ψ + βmc2Ψ (4) ∂t d d the wave equation (1), however Planck constant (divided − ∇ by 2π) ¯h and imaginary unit i = √ 1 do not appear in Comparing Eq.(3) and Eq.(4) we find that while ¯h and this equation. If quantum wave equation− must necessar- c are present in both equations, i does not appear in ily contain ¯h then Eq.(1) is purely a classical relativistic Eq.(3), therefore, the field Φ could be real or complex. wave equation with the assumption that the field U has The requirement that the Dirac wavefunction Ψd satis- appropriate relativistic Lorentz transformation property. fies the second-order derivative relativistic wave equation 2 of the form (3) leads to the condition that the quantities cogent justification: the only wave equation founded on αx, αy, αz,β anticommute in pairs and the square of each direct experimental laws, namely the Maxwell equations. is unity. It can be shown that α, β are 4 4 Hermitian is real. × matrices, and Ψd is a four component complex wavefunc- The discussion in the next section brings out the salient tion that can be represented as a column matrix with four aspects on the structure of wave equations throwing light rows. on the role of fundamental constant ¯h. The critical re- A nice exposition on the mathematical and physical view leads to the following question. Is there any relation foundations of the wave equations is given by Corson between the imaginary unit and spin? A new approach [2]. Of special interest is a heuristic but illuminating is articulated based on the equivalence between i and a discussion on spinors, geometry, and spinor wave equa- matrix C introduced in [3] tions in [2]. Mathematical concept of a spinor in three- 0 1 dimensional space is originally due to Cartan [3]. The C = (5) 1 0 structure of the wave equations has inspired numerous − new developments; the most striking is the discovery that has the property that C2 = 1; in fact, the unity − of the Dirac equation adhering to fundamental physical here is a 2 2 matrix that we denote by I2. We propose principles of quantum mechanics. a transformation× The set of equations (1)-(4) has well-known applica- i C (6) tions in physics. However the intrigue on the physical → interpretation of the Schroedinger equation (2) has never as a technique to obtain real wave equations. A new ended; even after the advent of quantum information sci- perspective on geometry and topology of complex num- ence new questions on the foundations of quantum me- bers and the properties of the matrix C constitute section chanics have arisen. Regarding the Dirac equation (4), III. An important consequence on the nature of topolog- the meaning of zitterbewegung and its relation with spin ical defect is used to analyze Z2 vortex for a real Her- have inspired a vast literature. In the present paper the mitian Hamiltonian describing a two-level quantum sys- significance of the Planck constant ¯h, the relativistic- tem [4]. It is shown in section IV that the nonrelativis- invariant mass parameter m, and the imaginary unit i tic Schroedinger equation (2) under the transformation is examined in a new approach. The importance of the (6) becomes a pair of coupled wave equations with real limit ¯h 0 for the quantum to classical transition has wavefunctions. This transformation is not a trivial re- → varied perception among physicists. Here we focus on statement of the Schroedinger equation: new physics to the limit m 0. Note that massless fields and par- interpret spin and imaginary unit arises here. Note that → ticles have many attractive mathematical and geomet- the unconventional connection of spin with Schroedinger rical properties. One of the surprising consequences of equation was first pointed out by Gurtler and Hestenes [5] massless limit, not appreciated in the literature, is that based on a different reasoning. In section V the transfor- the Plamck constant disappears from the wave equations mation (6) is applied to 2-spinor Weyl equation and Dirac in general. The imaginary unit also disappears in the equation to obtain real wave equations; relationship of Schroedinger equation, however its presence in the Pauli new form of real Dirac equation with Majorana equation matrix ensures that the Dirac equation cannot be made is discussed. Intriguing role of Pauli matrix σ2 in real real just by taking the massless limit. form is discussed and the Pauli algebra is given a topo- Recall that the complex numbers have enriched the logical interpretation in terms of the directed area defect mathematical analysis, and they have profound geomet- in phase space. A radically new perspective emerges in rical and topological properties. Complex representa- our approach for particle physics presented in section VI. tion of real physical quantities proves to be a powerful In section VII the present work on the interpretation of and convenient calculational tool. The presence of i in i is discussed in the context of the previous literature. the wave equations at a fundamental level, for example, Concluding remarks constitute the last section. in the Schroedinger and Dirac equations, however im- plies that the wavefunctions have to be necessarily com- plex. In fact, the initial apparent embarassment has been II. THE NATURE OF WAVE EQUATIONS turned to a virtue relating complex wavefunctions with the electrically charged particles. Moreover, the concept Physical arguments to examine new hypotheses and of anti-particles and spin-half interpretation of the Dirac mathematical formalisms are essentially based on three equation nicely co-exist with the complex wave equation. principal ingredients: the observed physical phenomena, Majorana in 1937 was able to obtain real version of the empirical facts/data, and physical principles.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 22 Scattering in Supersymmetric Matter Chern-Simons Theories at Large N
    2 2 scattering in supersymmetric matter ! Chern-Simons theories at large N Karthik Inbasekar 10th Asian Winter School on Strings, Particles and Cosmology 09 Jan 2016 Scattering in CS matter theories In QFT, Crossing symmetry: analytic continuation of amplitudes. Particle-antiparticle scattering: obtained from particle-particle scattering by analytic continuation. Naive crossing symmetry leads to non-unitary S matrices in U(N) Chern-Simons matter theories.[ Jain, Mandlik, Minwalla, Takimi, Wadia, Yokoyama] Consistency with unitarity required Delta function term at forward scattering. Modified crossing symmetry rules. Conjecture: Singlet channel S matrices have the form sin(πλ) = 8πpscos(πλ)δ(θ)+ i S;naive(s; θ) S πλ T S;naive: naive analytic continuation of particle-particle scattering. T Scattering in U(N) CS matter theories at large N Particle: fund rep of U(N), Antiparticle: antifund rep of U(N). Fundamental Fundamental Symm(Ud ) Asymm(Ue ) ⊗ ! ⊕ Fundamental Antifundamental Adjoint(T ) Singlet(S) ⊗ ! ⊕ C2(R1)+C2(R2)−C2(Rm) Eigenvalues of Anyonic phase operator νm = 2κ 1 νAsym νSym νAdj O ;ν Sing O(λ) ∼ ∼ ∼ N ∼ symm, asymm and adjoint channels- non anyonic at large N. Scattering in the singlet channel is effectively anyonic at large N- naive crossing rules fail unitarity. Conjecture beyond large N: general form of 2 2 S matrices in any U(N) Chern-Simons matter theory ! sin(πνm) (s; θ) = 8πpscos(πνm)δ(θ)+ i (s; θ) S πνm T Universality and tests Delta function and modified crossing rules conjectured by Jain et al appear to be universal. Tests of the conjecture: Unitarity of the S matrix.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction 2 Klein Gordon Equation
    Thimo Preis 1 1 Introduction Non-relativistic quantum mechanics refers to the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics applied in the context of Galilean relativity, more specifically quantizing the equations from the Hamiltonian formalism of non-relativistic Classical Mechanics by replacing dynamical variables by operators through the correspondence principle. Therefore, the physical properties predicted by the Schrödinger theory are invariant in a Galilean change of referential, but they do not have the invariance under a Lorentz change of referential required by the principle of relativity. In particular, all phenomena concerning the interaction between light and matter, such as emission, absorption or scattering of photons, is outside the framework of non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics. One of the main difficulties in elaborating relativistic Quantum Mechanics comes from the fact that the law of conservation of the number of particles ceases in general to be true. Due to the equivalence of mass and energy there can be creation or absorption of particles whenever the interactions give rise to energy transfers equal or superior to the rest massses of these particles. This theory, which i am about to present to you, is not exempt of difficulties, but it accounts for a very large body of experimental facts. We will base our deductions upon the six axioms of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics.Therefore, with the principles of quantum mechanics and of relativistic invariance at our disposal we will try to construct a Lorentz covariant wave equation. For this we need special relativity. 1.1 Special Relativity Special relativity states that the laws of nature are independent of the observer´s frame if it belongs to the class of frames obtained from each other by transformations of the Poincaré group.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Supersymmetry As New Mathematics
    old supersymmetry as new mathematics PILJIN YI Korea Institute for Advanced Study with help from Sungjay Lee Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem ~ 1963 1975 ~ Bogomolnyi-Prasad-Sommerfeld (BPS) Calabi-Yau ~ 1978 1977 ~ Supersymmetry Calibrated Geometry ~ 1982 1982 ~ Index Thm by Path Integral (Alvarez-Gaume) (Harvey & Lawson) 1985 ~ Calabi-Yau Compactification 1988 ~ Mirror Symmetry 1992~ 2d Wall-Crossing / tt* (Cecotti & Vafa etc) Homological Mirror Symmetry ~ 1994 1994 ~ 4d Wall-Crossing (Seiberg & Witten) (Kontsevich) 1998 ~ Wall-Crossing is Bound State Dissociation (Lee & P.Y.) Stability & Derived Category ~ 2000 2000 ~ Path Integral Proof of Mirror Symmetry (Hori & Vafa) Wall-Crossing Conjecture ~ 2008 2008 ~ Konstevich-Soibelman Explained (conjecture by Kontsevich & Soibelman) (Gaiotto & Moore & Neitzke) 2011 ~ KS Wall-Crossing proved via Quatum Mechanics (Manschot , Pioline & Sen / Kim , Park, Wang & P.Y. / Sen) 2012 ~ S2 Partition Function as tt* (Jocker, Kumar, Lapan, Morrison & Romo /Gomis & Lee) quantum and geometry glued by superstring theory when can we perform path integrals exactly ? counting geometry with supersymmetric path integrals quantum and geometry glued by superstring theory Einstein this theory famously resisted quantization, however on the other hand, five superstring theories, with a consistent quantum gravity inside, live in 10 dimensional spacetime these superstring theories say, spacetime is composed of 4+6 dimensions with very small & tightly-curved (say, Calabi-Yau) 6D manifold sitting at each and every point of
    [Show full text]
  • 5 the Dirac Equation and Spinors
    5 The Dirac Equation and Spinors In this section we develop the appropriate wavefunctions for fundamental fermions and bosons. 5.1 Notation Review The three dimension differential operator is : ∂ ∂ ∂ = , , (5.1) ∂x ∂y ∂z We can generalise this to four dimensions ∂µ: 1 ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ = , , , (5.2) µ c ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z 5.2 The Schr¨odinger Equation First consider a classical non-relativistic particle of mass m in a potential U. The energy-momentum relationship is: p2 E = + U (5.3) 2m we can substitute the differential operators: ∂ Eˆ i pˆ i (5.4) → ∂t →− to obtain the non-relativistic Schr¨odinger Equation (with = 1): ∂ψ 1 i = 2 + U ψ (5.5) ∂t −2m For U = 0, the free particle solutions are: iEt ψ(x, t) e− ψ(x) (5.6) ∝ and the probability density ρ and current j are given by: 2 i ρ = ψ(x) j = ψ∗ ψ ψ ψ∗ (5.7) | | −2m − with conservation of probability giving the continuity equation: ∂ρ + j =0, (5.8) ∂t · Or in Covariant notation: µ µ ∂µj = 0 with j =(ρ,j) (5.9) The Schr¨odinger equation is 1st order in ∂/∂t but second order in ∂/∂x. However, as we are going to be dealing with relativistic particles, space and time should be treated equally. 25 5.3 The Klein-Gordon Equation For a relativistic particle the energy-momentum relationship is: p p = p pµ = E2 p 2 = m2 (5.10) · µ − | | Substituting the equation (5.4), leads to the relativistic Klein-Gordon equation: ∂2 + 2 ψ = m2ψ (5.11) −∂t2 The free particle solutions are plane waves: ip x i(Et p x) ψ e− · = e− − · (5.12) ∝ The Klein-Gordon equation successfully describes spin 0 particles in relativistic quan- tum field theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizon Crossing Causes Baryogenesis, Magnetogenesis and Dark-Matter Acoustic Wave
    Horizon crossing causes baryogenesis, magnetogenesis and dark-matter acoustic wave She-Sheng Xue∗ ICRANet, Piazzale della Repubblica, 10-65122, Pescara, Physics Department, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le A. Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy Sapcetime S produces massive particle-antiparticle pairs FF¯ that in turn annihilate to spacetime. Such back and forth gravitational process S, FF¯ is described by Boltzmann- type cosmic rate equation of pair-number conservation. This cosmic rate equation, Einstein equation, and the reheating equation of pairs decay to relativistic particles completely deter- mine the horizon H, cosmological energy density, massive pair and radiation energy densities in reheating epoch. Moreover, oscillating S, FF¯ process leads to the acoustic perturba- tions of massive particle-antiparticle symmetric and asymmetric densities. We derive wave equations for these perturbations and find frequencies of lowest lying modes. Comparing their wavelengths with horizon variation, we show their subhorion crossing at preheating, and superhorizon crossing at reheating. The superhorizon crossing of particle-antiparticle asymmetric perturbations accounts for the baryogenesis of net baryon numbers, whose elec- tric currents lead to magnetogenesis. The baryon number-to-entropy ratio, upper and lower limits of primeval magnetic fields are computed in accordance with observations. Given a pivot comoving wavelength, it is shown that these perturbations, as dark-matter acoustic waves, originate in pre-inflation and return back to the horizon after the recombination, pos- sibly leaving imprints on the matter power spectrum at large length scales. Due to the Jeans instability, tiny pair-density acoustic perturbations in superhorizon can be amplified to the order of unity. Thus their amplitudes at reentry horizon become non-linear and maintain approximately constant physical sizes, and have physical influences on the formation of large scale structure and galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Lecture 1: Spinors, Their Properties and Spinor Prodcuts
    2 Lecture 1: spinors, their properties and spinor prodcuts Consider a theory of a single massless Dirac fermion . The Lagrangian is = ¯ i@ˆ . (2.1) L ⇣ ⌘ The Dirac equation is i@ˆ =0, (2.2) which, in momentum space becomes pUˆ (p)=0, pVˆ (p)=0, (2.3) depending on whether we take positive-energy(particle) or negative-energy (anti-particle) solutions of the Dirac equation. Therefore, in the massless case no di↵erence appears in equations for paprticles and anti-particles. Finding one solution is therefore sufficient. The algebra is simplified if we take γ matrices in Weyl repreentation where µ µ 0 σ γ = µ . (2.4) " σ¯ 0 # and σµ =(1,~σ) andσ ¯µ =(1, ~ ). The Pauli matrices are − 01 0 i 10 σ = ,σ= − ,σ= . (2.5) 1 10 2 i 0 3 0 1 " # " # " − # The matrix γ5 is taken to be 10 γ5 = − . (2.6) " 01# We can use the matrix γ5 to construct projection operators on to upper and lower parts of the four-component spinors U and V . The projection operators are 1 γ 1+γ Pˆ = − 5 , Pˆ = 5 . (2.7) L 2 R 2 Let us write u (p) U(p)= L , (2.8) uR(p) ! where uL(p) and uR(p) are two-component spinors. Since µ 0 pµσ pˆ = µ , (2.9) " pµσ¯ 0(p) # andpU ˆ (p) = 0, the two-component spinors satisfy the following (Weyl) equations µ µ pµσ uR(p)=0,pµσ¯ uL(p)=0. (2.10) –3– Suppose that we have a left handed spinor uL(p) that satisfies the Weyl equation.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacuum Energy
    Vacuum Energy Mark D. Roberts, 117 Queen’s Road, Wimbledon, London SW19 8NS, Email:[email protected] http://cosmology.mth.uct.ac.za/ roberts ∼ February 1, 2008 Eprint: hep-th/0012062 Comments: A comprehensive review of Vacuum Energy, which is an extended version of a poster presented at L¨uderitz (2000). This is not a review of the cosmolog- ical constant per se, but rather vacuum energy in general, my approach to the cosmological constant is not standard. Lots of very small changes and several additions for the second and third versions: constructive feedback still welcome, but the next version will be sometime in coming due to my sporadiac internet access. First Version 153 pages, 368 references. Second Version 161 pages, 399 references. arXiv:hep-th/0012062v3 22 Jul 2001 Third Version 167 pages, 412 references. The 1999 PACS Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme: http://publish.aps.org/eprint/gateway/pacslist 11.10.+x, 04.62.+v, 98.80.-k, 03.70.+k; The 2000 Mathematical Classification Scheme: http://www.ams.org/msc 81T20, 83E99, 81Q99, 83F05. 3 KEYPHRASES: Vacuum Energy, Inertial Mass, Principle of Equivalence. 1 Abstract There appears to be three, perhaps related, ways of approaching the nature of vacuum energy. The first is to say that it is just the lowest energy state of a given, usually quantum, system. The second is to equate vacuum energy with the Casimir energy. The third is to note that an energy difference from a complete vacuum might have some long range effect, typically this energy difference is interpreted as the cosmological constant.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields
    7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields 7.1 The Dirac Equation and Quantum Field Theory The Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation which describes the quantum dynamics of spinors. We will see in this section that a consistent description of this theory cannot be done outside the framework of (local) relativistic Quantum Field Theory. The Dirac Equation (i∂/ m)ψ =0 ψ¯(i∂/ + m) = 0 (1) − can be regarded as the equations of motion of a complex field ψ. Much as in the case of the scalar field, and also in close analogy to the theory of non-relativistic many particle systems discussed in the last chapter, the Dirac field is an operator which acts on a Fock space. We have already discussed that the Dirac equation also follows from a least-action-principle. Indeed the Lagrangian i µ = [ψ¯∂ψ/ (∂µψ¯)γ ψ] mψψ¯ ψ¯(i∂/ m)ψ (2) L 2 − − ≡ − has the Dirac equation for its equation of motion. Also, the momentum Πα(x) canonically conjugate to ψα(x) is ψ δ † Πα(x)= L = iψα (3) δ∂0ψα(x) Thus, they obey the equal-time Poisson Brackets ψ 3 ψα(~x), Π (~y) P B = iδαβδ (~x ~y) (4) { β } − Thus † 3 ψα(~x), ψ (~y) P B = δαβδ (~x ~y) (5) { β } − † In other words the field ψα and its adjoint ψα are a canonical pair. This result follows from the fact that the Dirac Lagrangian is first order in time derivatives. Notice that the field theory of non-relativistic many-particle systems (for both fermions on bosons) also has a Lagrangian which is first order in time derivatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing Symmetry in the Planar Limit
    Crossing Symmetry in the Planar Limit Sebastian Mizera [email protected] Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA Crossing symmetry asserts that particles are indistinguishable from anti-particles traveling back in time. In quantum field theory, this statement translates to the long- standing conjecture that probabilities for observing the two scenarios in a scattering experiment are described by one and the same function. Why could we expect it to be true? In this work we examine this question in a simplified setup and take steps towards illuminating a possible physical interpretation of crossing symmetry. To be more concrete, we consider planar scattering amplitudes involving any number of particles with arbitrary spins and masses to all loop orders in perturbation theory. We show that by deformations of the external momenta one can smoothly interpolate between pairs of crossing channels without encountering singularities or violating mass-shell conditions and momentum conservation. The analytic continuation can be realized using two types of moves. The first one makes use of an i" prescription for avoiding singularities near the physical kinematics and allows us to adjust the momenta of the external particles relative to one another within their lightcones. The second, more violent, step involves a rotation of subsets of particle momenta via their complexified lightcones from the future to the past and vice versa. We show that any singularity along such a deformation would have to correspond to two beams of particles scattering off each other. For planar Feynman diagrams, these kinds of singularities are absent because of the particular flow of energies through their propagators.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitp Lectures on BPS States and Wall-Crossing in D = 4, N = 2 Theories
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION PiTP Lectures on BPS States and Wall-Crossing in d = 4, N = 2 Theories Gregory W. Moore2 2 NHETC and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855{0849, USA [email protected] Abstract: These are notes to accompany a set of three lectures at the July 2010 PiTP school. Lecture I reviews some aspects of N = 2 d = 4 supersymmetry with an emphasis on the BPS spectrum of the theory. It concludes with the primitive wall-crossing formula. Lecture II gives a fairly elementary and physical derivation of the Kontsevich-Soibelman wall-crossing formula. Lecture III sketches applications to line operators and hyperk¨ahler geometry, and introduces an interesting set of \Darboux functions" on Seiberg-Witten moduli spaces, which can be constructed from a version of Zamolodchikov's TBA. ||| UNDER CONSTRUCTION!!! 7:30pm, JULY 29, 2010 ||| Contents 1. Lecture 0: Introduction and Overview 3 1.1 Why study BPS states? 3 1.2 Overview of the Lectures 4 2. Lecture I: BPS indices and the primitive wall crossing formula 5 2.1 The N=2 Supersymmetry Algebra 5 2.2 Particle representations 6 2.2.1 Long representations of N = 2 7 2.2.2 Short representations of N = 2 9 2.3 Field Multiplets 10 2.4 Families of Theories 10 2.5 Low energy effective theory: Abelian Gauge Theory 12 2.5.1 Spontaneous symmetry breaking 12 2.5.2 Electric and Magnetic Charges 12 2.5.3 Self-dual abelian gauge theory 13 2.5.4 Lagrangian decomposition of a symplectic vector with compatible complex structure 13 2.5.5
    [Show full text]
  • On the Connection Between the Solutions to the Dirac and Weyl
    On the connection between the solutions to the Dirac and Weyl equations and the corresponding electromagnetic 4-potentials Aristides I. Kechriniotis ∗ Christos A. Tsonos † Konstantinos K. Delibasis ‡ Georgios N. Tsigaridas§ September 14, 2019 Abstract In this paper we study in detail the connection between the solutions to the Dirac and Weyl equation and the associated electromagnetic 4- potentials. First, it is proven that all solutions to the Weyl equations are degenerate, in the sense that they correspond to an infinite number of electromagnetic 4-potentials. As far as the solutions to the Dirac equa- tion are concerned, it is shown that they can be classified into two classes. The elements of the first class correspond to one and only one 4-potential, and are called non-degenerate Dirac solutions. On the other hand, the ele- ments of the second class correspond to an infinite number of 4-potentials, and are called degenerate Dirac solutions. Further, it is proven that at least two of these 4-potentials are gauge-inequivalent, corresponding to different electromagnetic fields. In order to illustrate this particularly im- portant result we have studied the degenerate solutions to the force-free Dirac equation and shown that they correspond to massless particles. We have also provided explicit examples regarding solutions to the force-free Weyl equation and the Weyl equation for a constant magnetic field. In all cases we have calculated the infinite number of different electromagnetic fields corresponding to these solutions. arXiv:1208.2546v10 [math-ph] 15 Sep 2019 PACS: 03.65.Pm, 03.50.De, 41.20.-q ∗General Department, University of Thessaly, GR-35100 Lamia, Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • (2021) Reaction Rates and the Noisy Saddle-Node Bifurcation
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 3, 013156 (2021) Reaction rates and the noisy saddle-node bifurcation: Renormalization group for barrier crossing David Hathcock and James P. Sethna Department of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA (Received 22 October 2020; accepted 29 January 2021; published 17 February 2021) Barrier crossing calculations in chemical reaction-rate theory typically assume that the barrier is large compared to the temperature. When the barrier vanishes, however, there is a qualitative change in behavior. Instead of crossing a barrier, particles slide down a sloping potential. We formulate a renormalization group description of this noisy saddle-node transition. We derive the universal scaling behavior and corrections to scaling for the mean escape time in overdamped systems with arbitrary barrier height. We also develop an accurate approximation to the full distribution of barrier escape times by approximating the eigenvalues of the Fokker-Plank operator as equally spaced. This lets us derive a family of distributions that captures the barrier crossing times for arbitrary barrier height. Our critical theory draws links between barrier crossing in chemistry, the renormalization group, and bifurcation theory. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013156 I. INTRODUCTION quasiequilibrium state and the escape from that state [18]. In the limit of vanishing barrier, however, there is a qualitative In this paper we investigate deep connections between change in behavior. Particles instead slide down a monotonic barrier crossing, the renormalization group, and the noisy potential, spending the most time near its inflection point. To saddle-node bifurcation. In particular, we show that Kramers’ capture the low barrier escape rate, extensions to Kramers’ reaction rates can be understood as an asymptotic limit of theory have been developed (e.g., incorporating anharmonic the universal scaling near the continuous transition between corrections), but these have significant errors when the barrier high barrier and barrierless regimes.
    [Show full text]