Real wave equations, spin origin of charge, and outlook on particle physics S. C. Tiwari Department of Physics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, and Institute of Natural Philosophy Varanasi India Radical revision on the conventional spacetime picture, illusion or emergent phenomenon, has been the focus of the speculations on the unified frameworks for fundamental interactions in nature. Compared to strong experimental credence to the standard model of particle physics there is prac- tically no relation of these speculations with the world of real particles. In this paper we present a new conceptual framework for particle physics in which nontrivial geometry and topology of space and time have fundamental reality. To develop this model we proceed with the analysis of the stan- 0 1 dard wave equations and make them real using the transformation rule i = √ 1 C = . − → 1 0 Topological significance is attached to i in terms of a point defect in 1D directed line. New− inter- pretation of Schroedinger wave equation and Z2 vortex throw light on the nature of spin. A new meaning is also obtained on U(1) gauge symmetry and charge. Novel properties of C-matrix and known applications are presented. Topological origin of spin is inferred from the interpretation of Pauli algebra that they signify 2D directed area in phase space as topological obstruction. Elec- tron magnetic moment decomposition in QED serves the basis for the proposition: spin origin of charge (SOC). A dynamical logarithmic spiral geometric structure comprising of 2+1D braids, 3 vortices with associated three 2-spinors is envisaged based on SOC. It is termed as meta-electron; meta-neutrino has 2-vortex structure. These are the only building blocks of all particles having the knotted vortex structures in our model. Coupling strengths of the three fundamental interactions are related with the magnitudes of the spin angular momentum of constituent spinors of the meta- electron. Unification has radically new paradigm compared to gauge theories: effective coupling constant with weight factors. To put the role of i in perspective a discussion on previous works is also presented. Outlook on particle physics is elaborated in this new framework. PACS numbers: 12.90.+b I. INTRODUCTION In the literature, quite often the relativistic wave equa- tion refers to quantum relativistic wave equations, e. g. The standard model in particle physics has enormous Dirac equation for the electron. experimental support. However alternative ideas and ex- In the nonrelativistic Schroedinger wave equation the tensions are being of great interest to break the per- distinct feature is the presence of both (¯h,i) that gives it ceived impasse in the unification goal. We investigate the mysterious characteristic [1], of course, the velocity real wave equations with a new approach in this paper: of light has no role in this equation that we write for free the main aim is to gain new insights on the nature of particle elementary particles and unification of their interactions. 2 ¯h 2 ∂Ψs Modern quantum field theories (QFTs) work in natural Ψs = i¯h (2) units ¯h = c = 1 such that for length and time one has − 2m∇ ∂t 1 the dimension of (mass)− . In contrast, physical inter- Relativistic Schroedinger equation or Klein-Gordon pretation of relativity and quantum mechanics crucially (KG) equation is a scalar relativistic wave equation for a depends on the explicit presence of c and ¯h respectively. particle with non-zero rest mass arXiv:1911.10910v1 [physics.gen-ph] 15 Nov 2019 Relativistic wave equation for a scalar, a vector, a spinor 1 ∂2Φ m2c4 and a tensor field, let us denote them by U (suppressing 2Φ = Φ (3) the indices) is given by ∇ − c2 ∂t2 ¯h2 Dirac equation for the electron is a first-order derivative 1 ∂2U ∂µ∂ U = 2U = 0 (1) wave equation for the Dirac spinor µ ∇ − c2 ∂t2 ∂Ψd Here the vacuum velocity of light c is an integral part of i¯h = i¯hc α. Ψ + βmc2Ψ (4) ∂t d d the wave equation (1), however Planck constant (divided − ∇ by 2π) ¯h and imaginary unit i = √ 1 do not appear in Comparing Eq.(3) and Eq.(4) we find that while ¯h and this equation. If quantum wave equation− must necessar- c are present in both equations, i does not appear in ily contain ¯h then Eq.(1) is purely a classical relativistic Eq.(3), therefore, the field Φ could be real or complex. wave equation with the assumption that the field U has The requirement that the Dirac wavefunction Ψd satis- appropriate relativistic Lorentz transformation property. fies the second-order derivative relativistic wave equation 2 of the form (3) leads to the condition that the quantities cogent justification: the only wave equation founded on αx, αy, αz,β anticommute in pairs and the square of each direct experimental laws, namely the Maxwell equations. is unity. It can be shown that α, β are 4 4 Hermitian is real. × matrices, and Ψd is a four component complex wavefunc- The discussion in the next section brings out the salient tion that can be represented as a column matrix with four aspects on the structure of wave equations throwing light rows. on the role of fundamental constant ¯h. The critical re- A nice exposition on the mathematical and physical view leads to the following question. Is there any relation foundations of the wave equations is given by Corson between the imaginary unit and spin? A new approach [2]. Of special interest is a heuristic but illuminating is articulated based on the equivalence between i and a discussion on spinors, geometry, and spinor wave equa- matrix C introduced in [3] tions in [2]. Mathematical concept of a spinor in three- 0 1 dimensional space is originally due to Cartan [3]. The C = (5) 1 0 structure of the wave equations has inspired numerous − new developments; the most striking is the discovery that has the property that C2 = 1; in fact, the unity − of the Dirac equation adhering to fundamental physical here is a 2 2 matrix that we denote by I2. We propose principles of quantum mechanics. a transformation× The set of equations (1)-(4) has well-known applica- i C (6) tions in physics. However the intrigue on the physical → interpretation of the Schroedinger equation (2) has never as a technique to obtain real wave equations. A new ended; even after the advent of quantum information sci- perspective on geometry and topology of complex num- ence new questions on the foundations of quantum me- bers and the properties of the matrix C constitute section chanics have arisen. Regarding the Dirac equation (4), III. An important consequence on the nature of topolog- the meaning of zitterbewegung and its relation with spin ical defect is used to analyze Z2 vortex for a real Her- have inspired a vast literature. In the present paper the mitian Hamiltonian describing a two-level quantum sys- significance of the Planck constant ¯h, the relativistic- tem [4]. It is shown in section IV that the nonrelativis- invariant mass parameter m, and the imaginary unit i tic Schroedinger equation (2) under the transformation is examined in a new approach. The importance of the (6) becomes a pair of coupled wave equations with real limit ¯h 0 for the quantum to classical transition has wavefunctions. This transformation is not a trivial re- → varied perception among physicists. Here we focus on statement of the Schroedinger equation: new physics to the limit m 0. Note that massless fields and par- interpret spin and imaginary unit arises here. Note that → ticles have many attractive mathematical and geomet- the unconventional connection of spin with Schroedinger rical properties. One of the surprising consequences of equation was first pointed out by Gurtler and Hestenes [5] massless limit, not appreciated in the literature, is that based on a different reasoning. In section V the transfor- the Plamck constant disappears from the wave equations mation (6) is applied to 2-spinor Weyl equation and Dirac in general. The imaginary unit also disappears in the equation to obtain real wave equations; relationship of Schroedinger equation, however its presence in the Pauli new form of real Dirac equation with Majorana equation matrix ensures that the Dirac equation cannot be made is discussed. Intriguing role of Pauli matrix σ2 in real real just by taking the massless limit. form is discussed and the Pauli algebra is given a topo- Recall that the complex numbers have enriched the logical interpretation in terms of the directed area defect mathematical analysis, and they have profound geomet- in phase space. A radically new perspective emerges in rical and topological properties. Complex representa- our approach for particle physics presented in section VI. tion of real physical quantities proves to be a powerful In section VII the present work on the interpretation of and convenient calculational tool. The presence of i in i is discussed in the context of the previous literature. the wave equations at a fundamental level, for example, Concluding remarks constitute the last section. in the Schroedinger and Dirac equations, however im- plies that the wavefunctions have to be necessarily com- plex. In fact, the initial apparent embarassment has been II. THE NATURE OF WAVE EQUATIONS turned to a virtue relating complex wavefunctions with the electrically charged particles. Moreover, the concept Physical arguments to examine new hypotheses and of anti-particles and spin-half interpretation of the Dirac mathematical formalisms are essentially based on three equation nicely co-exist with the complex wave equation. principal ingredients: the observed physical phenomena, Majorana in 1937 was able to obtain real version of the empirical facts/data, and physical principles.