DOCSLIB.ORG

Panther Creek Timber Management Project Environmental Assessment and Unsigned Finding of No Significant Impact

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Panther Creek Timber Management Project Environmental Assessment and Unsigned Finding of No Significant Impact The Panther Creek Timber Management Project Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)1 for Environmental Assessment: DOI-BLM-ORWA-N040-2017-0003-EA Summer, 2018 United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office Northwest Oregon District, Tillamook Field Office Yamhill County, Oregon Responsible Agency: USDI - Bureau of Land Management Responsible Official: Karen Schank Field Manager Tillamook Field Office 4610 Third Street Tillamook, OR 97141 (503) 815-1100 For Further Information, contact: Landon Rhodes Tillamook Resource Area 4610 Third Street Tillamook, OR 97141 (503) 815-1460 Introduction The Tillamook Field Office, Northwest Oregon District Bureau of Land Management (BLM), has conducted an environmental analysis for the Panther Creek Timber Management Project (Panther Creek Project). In the Panther Creek Project, the BLM has analyzed three action alternatives, and a No Action alternative, which examine varying methods of conducting forest management activities on approximately 781 acres of BLM lands, which includes commercial timber sales, within the Panther Creek 6th-field subwatershed of the North Yamhill River watershed. The action alternatives include regeneration harvest and commercial thinning within the Harvest Land Base-Moderate Intensity Timber Area land use allocation, and commercial thinning within the Riparian Reserve land use allocation. The action will occur in forest stands in various conditions. Some stands are at or above the age which produces maximum average annual growth over the lifetime of the stand; some stands are within an age group that currently makes up a preponderance of acres within the Harvest Land Base in the Tillamook Field Office; other stands are underproductive due to disease infestations or they are stocked with less desirable commercial species; while still other stands are overly dense and in need of thinning to continue healthy growth 1 This unsigned FONSI is included here along with the Panther Creek Timber Management Project EA in order to provide the public the opportunity to review and comment on both documents. After a public comment period, the Tillamook Field Manager will consider comments received and if appropriate, will finalize and sign the FONSI. FONSI for EA# DOI-BLM-ORWA-N040-2017-0003-EA – Panther Creek Timber Management Project rates and to improve stand value and merchantability as well as the development of structural complexity. The Riparian Reserve stands proposed for treatments are overstocked with a single aged Douglas-fir overstory that lacks the structural layering characteristic of older stands, including large trees with complex crowns and shade tolerant tree species in the mid and understories. All action alternatives also include construction, maintenance and improvement of roads and culverts, rock sourcing through quarry operations, planting native conifer and hardwood species following regeneration harvest and commercial thinning treatments, snag creation, Riparian Reserve post-harvest tree felling, and the treatment of a portion of the fuels created by the harvest operations. The area where the Panther Creek Timber Management Project will occur is approximately 9 miles northwest of the town of McMinnville, Oregon. The project area includes BLM-managed lands within sections 17, 19, 29, 33 and 34 of Township 3 South, Range 5 West, and sections 13, 23, 24 and 25 in Township 3 South, Range 6 West, (Willamette Meridian) in Yamhill County, Oregon. The analysis in this EA is site-specific and the proposed timber management activities have been designed to conform to the Northwestern and Coastal Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan. The EA and unsigned FONSI will be made available for public review from August 10, 2018 through September 10, 2018. Comments received by the Tillamook Field Office of the Northwest Oregon District Office, 4610 Third Street, Tillamook, Oregon, 97141, on or before Septermber 10, 2018 will be considered in making the final decision for this project. Finding of No Significant Impact Based upon review of the Panther Creek Timber Management Project Environmental Assessment (EA) and the supporting project record, I have determined that this project is not a major federal action and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment, individually or cumulatively with other actions in the general area. No environmental effects meet the definition of significance in context or intensity as defined in 40 CFR 1508.27. There are no site-specific impacts that will require supplemental/additional information to the analysis done in the Western Oregon Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, March 2016 (RMP/FEIS). Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not needed. This finding is based on the following discussion: Context. The proposed project is a site-specific action directly involving a total of approximately 781 acres of BLM administered land, along with actions occurring on various haul roads. These actions will affect about 6.7% of the 11,653 acre Panther Creek 6th field subwatershed and by themselves do not have international, national, region-wide, or state-wide importance. The discussion of the significance criteria that follows applies to the intended actions and is within the context of local importance. The EA details the effects of the action alternatives; none of the effects identified, including direct, indirect and cumulative effects, are considered to be significant and do not exceed those effects described in the RMP/FEIS. Intensity. The following discussion is organized around the Ten Significance Criteria described in 40 CFR 1508.27. The discussions below apply to the proposed action contained within the Panther Creek Timber Management Project EA. 1. Impacts may be both beneficial and adverse: The effects of the timber management project are unlikely to have significant (beneficial and/or adverse) impacts (EA Section 3.2) for the following reasons: Vegetation and Forest Resources (EA section 3.2): Effects to these resources will not have significant impacts because: 2 FONSI for EA# DOI-BLM-ORWA-N040-2017-0003-EA – Panther Creek Timber Management Project Regeneration harvest in the Harvest Land Base will contribute to the Salem Sustained Yield Unit Allowable Sale Quantity; begin to generally balance age class groupings within the project area, providing sustained-yield treatment opportunities into the future; and increase the productivity of stands currently infested with root rot disease and/or heavily composed of hardwood species and otherwise capable of growing conifers. Commercial thinning in the Harvest Land Base will contribute timber volume to the Salem Sustained Yield Unit Allowable Sale Quantity; increase the value and merchantability of stands for future harvest by increasing residual tree growth and providing large logs to the market; and enhance stand structural complexity and vegetative diversity. Variably spaced commercial thinning, underplanting of shade tolerant native conifer species, snag creation, and tree felling in portions of the Riparian Reserve will develop greater structural complexity and vegetative diversity in a reduced amount of time. Wildlife Resources - (Includes ESA listed species and BLM Special Status Species): (EA section 3.3) Effects to this resource will not have significant impacts because: ESA Listed Species All habitat for northern spotted owls that will be modified by the project has been surveyed to protocol and determined to be unoccupied. Per the survey protocol, spot check surveys will continue to occur until project implementation begins, and if occupancy is determined in the project area through these continued survey efforts, coordination with the USFWS will ensure no take as defined by the ESA will occur. The Haskins Creek site is the only spotted owl known site within the analysis area; it was last known to have been occupied in 2008. Proposed treatment will maintain existing habitat conditions within the nest patch and will improve the development of nesting-roosting habitat within the core area of this site, consistent with the ROD/RMP conservation measure guidance of Appendix A (ROD/RMP, p. 108). All habitat for the marbled murrelet that will be modified by the project will be surveyed to protocol by September 2018 and prior to any timber sale Decision for this project. If any occupied marbled murrelet sites are discovered during protocol surveys, or during project implementation, they will be protected by a change in the Land Use Allocation of the occupied stand to Late Successional Reserve (ROD/RMP, p. 52 and 98). Should any occupied marbled murrelet sites be discovered, the project will be evaluated and through a combination of daily time restrictions, restricting seasons of operation, and/or dropping treatment units, protection of the occupied marbled murrelet sites will be ensured. Although there will be potential for disturbance to spotted owls and/or marbled murrelets as a result of the project, there will be no disruption. Spotted owls and/or marbled murrelets, if present, may be distracted from their normal activity but the Panther Creek Project will not create a likelihood of injury or loss of reproduction. BLM Special Status Species: (EA section 3.3) All habitat for the red tree vole and Bureau Sensitive (BS) mollusk species that may be affected by the project have been surveyed to protocol. Sites where Bureau Sensitive mollusk species were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mill Creek Watershed Assessment
    Yamhill Basin Council Mill Watershed Assessment December 30, 1999 Funding for the Mill Assessment was provided by the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board and Resource Assistance for Rural Environments. Mill Assessment Project Manager: Robert J. Bower, Principal Author Co-authors: Chris Lupoli, Linfield College intern, for Riparian section and assisted with Wetlands Conditions section. Tamara Quandt, Linfield College intern, for Sensitive Species section. Editors: Melissa Leoni, Yamhill Basin Council, McMinnville, OR Alison Bower, Forest Ecologist, Corvallis, OR Contributors: Bill Ferber, Salem, Water Resources Department (WRD) Chester Novak, Salem, Bureau Land Management (BLM) Dan Upton, Dallas, Willamette Industries David Anderson, Monmouth, Boise Cascade Dean Anderson, Dallas, Polk County Geographical Information Systems (GIS) Dennis Ades, Salem, Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Gary Galovich, Corvallis, Oregon Department Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Mark Koski, Salem, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Patrick Hawe, Salem, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Rob Tracey, McMinnville, Natural Resource and Conservation Service (NRCS) Stan Christensen, McMinnville, Yamhill Soil Water Conservation District Susan Maleki, Corvallis, Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) Warren Tausch, Tillamook Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Special Thanks: ! John Cruickshank, Gooseneck Creek resident for his assistance with the Historical, and Channel Modification sections and in the gathering of historical photographs. ! Gooseneck Creek Watershed Group for their support and guidance. ! John Caputo, Yamhill County GIS. ! BLM and Polk County GIS for providing some of the GIS base layers used to create the maps in this assessment. ! USDA Service Center, Natural Resource Conservation Service, McMinnville, for copying and office support. ! Polk and Yamhill Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ! Nick Varnum, PNG Environmental Inc., Tigard, for assisting with the Hydrology and Channel Habitat Typing sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Yamhill Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan
    Yamhill Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan Developed by the: The Oregon Department of Agriculture With support from the: Yamhill Local Advisory Committee and The Yamhill Soil and Water Conservation District The Polk Soil and Water Conservation District December 2017 Yamhill Basin Management Area Contacts: Oregon Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Programs 635 Capitol Street NE Salem, OR 97301 (503)-986-4700 ODA Yamhill Basin Agricultural Water Quality Specialist Office: (503)-986-5141 Link to Area Plan: www.oregon.gov/ODA/programs/NaturalResources/AgWQ/Pages/AgWQPlans.aspx Yamhill SWCD 2200 SW 2nd Street McMinnville, OR 97128 Phone: (503) 472-1474 http://www.yamhillswcd.org/ Polk SWCD 580 Main Street, Suite A Dallas, OR 97338 Phone: (503) 623- 9680 ext. 101 www.polkswcd.com Yamhill Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan December 2017 Page ii Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms Used in this Document .........................................................................i Foreword ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Required Elements of Area Plans ............................................................................................. 1 Plan Content ................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Management Program Purpose and Background 3 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water
    [Show full text]
  • City of Carlton Oregon
    City of Carlton Comprehensive Plan 2000 AMENDED: JULY 2007 UNE J 2009 Prepared for the: CITY OF CARLTON, OREGON Printed: April 2008 Prepared by: Mid-Willamette Valley Council of Governments Salem, Oregon Funded by: This document was partially funded by a grant from the State of Oregon acting by and through The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. ii NOTICE TO USERS This City of Carlton, Comprehensive Plan 2000 is a compilation and reprint of the original City of Carlton, Comprehensive Land Use Plan, May 1979 as acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission on May 6, 1980 as subsequently duly amended by various actions of the City. All amendments have been incorporated along with the text and graphics with amendments to the City of Carlton, Planning Atlas, May 1979. The original documents and amendments on file and available for inspection in the office of the City Recorder of the City of Carlton have been faithfully compared to this City of Carlton, Comprehensive Plan 2000 which constitutes a true copy of the same following compilation of duly passed amendments. Attested to this ___ day of_________, 2001. ______________________________ Apryl Denman, City Recorder iii [This page left intentionally blank] iv Table of Contents INTRODUCTION vii BACKGROUND NOTES ix FINDINGS, GOALS AND POLICIES CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT [Goal-1] 1-1 LAND USE PLANNING [Goal-2] 1-3 NATURAL RESOURCES Agricultural Lands [Goal-3] 1-5 Forest Lands [Goal-4] 1-5 Open Spaces and Scenic Sites [Goal-5a] 1-6 Mineral and Aggregate Resources
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for the Proposed HIO 13R-31L RSA Improvements
    Environmental Assessment for the Proposed HIO 13R-31L RSA Improvements Draft EA Hillsboro Airport (HIO), Hillsboro, Oregon I April 2021 Appendix D: Final Cultural Resource Technical Report For further information: Airport Sponsor: EA Preparer: Ilon Logan Environmental Protection Specialist U.S. Department of Transportation – Maureen Minister 851 SW Sixth Avenue Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Conservation Manager Suite 1600 Seattle Airports District Office 7200 NE Airport Way Portland, Oregon 97204 2200 S. 216th Street Portland, Oregon 97218 Des Moines, Washington 98198 Contact info: Contact info: [email protected] or [email protected] or 206-231-4220 503-415-6682 Environmental Assessment for the Proposed HIO 13R-31L RSA Improvements Final Cultural Resource Technical Report March 17, 2021 Prepared for: Prepared by: 600 SW Alder Suite 200 Portland, OR, 97205 851 SW Sixth Avenue Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon 97204 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Project Description ................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Regulations, Standards, and Guidelines ................................................................................................ 9 4. Existing Data and Background Data .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Characteristics
    SECTION 2 Watershed Characteristics This section describes drainage characteristics unique to the City of McMinnville and the watersheds that drain through the City. The following drainage characteristics are summarized: location, study area parameters, climate, soil conditions, topography, groundwater, existing drainage facilities, and existing and future land use conditions. This information will be used in the master plan to evaluate the performance of the existing drainage facilities and to identify future drainage requirements. 2.1 Location The City of McMinnville is located in Yamhill County, situated in the northern Willamette Valley between the Coastal and Cascade Mountain ranges. It is approximately 35 miles southwest of Portland and 26 miles northwest of Salem, Oregon. The City of McMinnville is mostly situated between the North and South Forks of the Yamhill River just upstream of their confluence. The Yamhill River flows northeastward from McMinnville approximately 7 miles before reaching the Willamette River. Four major waterways drain the City of McMinnville: Cozine Creek with its branches, Baker Creek, North Yamhill River, and the South Yamhill River. Figure 2-1, Topography Map, shows the location of these four major waterways. The area of the entire watershed that drains McMinnville and drains through the McMinnville urban growth boundary (UGB) is approximately 10,727 acres, 50 percent of which is drained by Cozine Creek. Cozine Creek, in turn, discharges into the South Fork of the Yamhill River. 2.2 Study Area Delineation While this master plan considers the runoff impact from the entire watershed that drains through the City, the specific study area for this plan is the McMinnville UGB.
    [Show full text]
  • Yamhill - 17090008 8 Digit Hydrologic Unit Profile FINAL JANUARY 2005 JANUARY 2005
    Yamhill - 17090008 8 Digit Hydrologic Unit Profile FINAL JANUARY 2005 Introduction The Yamhill 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) watershed is 493,469 acres in Northwest Oregon. Ninety-nine percent of the Yamhill watershed is in Yamhill and Polk counties. There are 1,679 farms in the watershed. Sixty-five percent of the farms are less than 50 acres. Eighty-six percent of the watershed is in private ownership. The land is 58 percent forest, 29 percent grass seed pasture and hay land, and the remaining acres are mostly in grain crops, nurseries, vineyards, or row crops. Conservation assistance is provided by six NRCS service centers, one Resource Conservation and Development (RC&D) office, one soil survey office, and seven Soil and Water Conservation Districts. Profile Contents Introduction Resource Concerns Physical Description Census and Social Data Landuse Map & Precipitation Map Progress/Status Common Resource Area Footnotes/Bibliography Relief Map The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, Produced by the sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons Water Resources with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s Planning Team TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). Portland, OR To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profile
    Section 2: Community Profile Why Plan for Natural Hazards in Yamhill County? ....................................... 2 History of Natural Hazards in Yamhill County .............................................. 2 Geography and Environment....................................................................... 3 Rivers and Streams ............................................................................... 4 Climate .................................................................................................. 7 Minerals and Soils ................................................................................. 8 Significant Geological Factors ............................................................... 8 Population and Demographics..................................................................... 9 Land and Development ............................................................................. 11 Development Regulations.................................................................... 12 Housing and Community Development ..................................................... 13 Employment and History ........................................................................... 13 Transportation and Commuting ................................................................. 14 Historic and Cultural Resources ................................................................ 15 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure............................................................ 15 Yamhill County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan: Community
    [Show full text]
  • 10–7–03 Vol. 68 No. 194 Tuesday Oct. 7, 2003 Pages 57783–58008
    10–7–03 Tuesday Vol. 68 No. 194 Oct. 7, 2003 Pages 57783–58008 VerDate jul 14 2003 22:52 Oct 06, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\07OCWS.LOC 07OCWS 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2003 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    November 22, 2004 Yamhill County’s Comprehensive Parks and Open Space Master Plan was adopted by the Yamhill County Board of Commissioners on June 19, 2003 by Board Order 03-413. YAMHILL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ______________________________________________ Chair KATHY GEORGE ______________________________________________ Commissioner MARY P. STERN ______________________________________________ Commissioner LESLIE LEWIS Table of Contents page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i PART I: YAMHILL COUNTY NEEDS 1 1. Introduction 1 Mission Statement 1 Purpose of the Master Plan 1 Master Plan Objectives 2 Yamhill County Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2 2. Yamhill County Profile 4 History 4 Natural History and Ecology 4 Population and Demographics 7 Public Park, Recreation and Open Space System 7 3. Yamhill County Park & Open Space Analysis 12 Existing Parks and Open Spaces 12 Park Conditions Assessment 31 System Analysis 33 Comparison With Other Selected Counties 34 4. Public Involvement 35 Questionnaire Survey 35 Public Outreach Meetings 36 Public Review Meetings 37 PART II: FRAMING THE PLAN 39 5. Strategic Issues and Findings 39 PART III: THE PLAN 43 6. Vision, Goals, and Policies 43 Board Vision 43 Vision Statement 45 Goals and Policies 46 Future Yamhill County Parks and Open Spaces 49 PART IV: IMPLEMENTATION 52 7. Action Strategies 54 Parks and Open Spaces Classification System 54 Implementation Strategies 56 Maps and Tables page MAPS Map 1: Parks and Open Space Areas in Yamhill County 9 Map 2: Yamhill County Parks Vision Diagram 51 TABLES Table 1: Yamhill
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Willamette River Basin Oregon
    USDA Report on WATER and RELATED LAND RESOURCES MIDDLE WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN OREGON 'Based on a cooperative Survey by THE STATE WATER RESOURCES BOARD OF URREGO.N P r e p a r ed b y - ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE" FOREST SERVICE" SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE JULY 1 9 6 2 USDA Report on WATER AND RELATED LAND RESOURCES MIDDLE WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN OREGON Based on a Cooperative Survey by THE STATE WATER RESOURCES BOARD OF OREGON and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Report Prepared by USDA River Basin Survey Field Party, Salem, Oregon H.H.Ralphs,Soil Conservation Service, Leader D.D.Raitt,Economic Research Service W.C.Fessel,Forest Service H.E,Carnahan, Soil Conservation Service K.K.Smith, Roil Conservation Service, Typist Under Direction of USDA Field Advisory Committee T.P.Helseth, Soil ConservationService,Chairman A.R.Blanch, Economic ResearchService K.W.Linstedt, Forest Service July 1962 P CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..................................................... SUMMARY.......................................................... iii GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE BASIN................................. 1 LOCATION AND SIZE........................................... PHYSICAL ASPECTS............................................. Geology ............................................... Coast RangeUplift ................................ Willamette Valley Trough .......................... Western and High Cascades......................... Topography.......................................... Coast Range....................................... Willamette
    [Show full text]
  • Cityofyamhill Oregon
    PB53 Yamhi: DOC-lC Commission• •07Y34 Ci·HT 1 Planning U3465 Atla. 168 1979 . Y36 Y364 1979 CITYOFYAMHILLOREGON PLANNING ATLAS A BACKGROUND DOCUMENT FOR THE YAMHILL COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. MAY: 1979 INTRODUCTION The material in this Planning Atlas is a synthesis of the information gathered and discussed during the development of the Yamhill Comprehen­ sive Land Use Plan. The goals and policies derived from this material are found in the companion document, Comprehensive Land Use Plan: City of Yamhill. Arranged to show how the Statewide land use goals were considered during development of Yamhill1s Plan, this material is intended to provide the factual base for those goals and policies upon which the community decided. It is hoped that the Atlas also will serve as the base for Plan update and revision in the future. Compilation of Atlas material was done by the Yamhill County Planning Staff, with the willing help of the Yamhill City Council, Yamhill Plan­ ning Commission, Yamhill Citizen Advisory Committee, and numerous state agency representatives, local utility representative and knowledgeable persons. County staff persons who worked on this atlas include: Ron Bunch, Rich Faith, Mike Brandt, Maggie Collins, Roberta Young, Blaise Edmonds, Gene Williamson, and Tom Cunningham. The preparation of this document was financed in part through a Compre;lensive Planning grant from the Depart­ ment of Housing and Urban Development under the provisions of Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1974, as amended, May, 1979, Yamhill County Planning Department. lHI'IEflSIIY OF 0AE!l0HIalARY .E\IGBIE, OREOOH To enhance the citizen involvement program, the goals and policies of the proposed plan were distributed to all citizens for their review and comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette River Bridge Design Enhancements Eugene - Oregon
    Willamette River Bridge Design Enhancements Eugene - Oregon Finalist Proposal Lillian Pitt Team March - 15 - 2011 Three Sculptures for the Story of the Kalapuya Camas Lily Vital Food Source & Trade Item Bulbs where roasted in stone-lined pits & pressed into cakes Lillian Pitt - Artist Statement I have made art for over thirty years. During that entire period, the work I have done has been informed by the heart and spirit of my Native American ancestors. When I look for proposals that most interest me, I choose to apply for those that ask me to do creative work that addresses Native American issues. This allows the chance to give back to the Native American community. It also empowers me to give voice to Native American stories that will inform the larger community in Oregon so everyone will learn something. It is for these reasons that I applied to design the public art for the Whilamut Bridge project. Preparing to design work for this project has been a very enlightening experience that has allowed me to use various strategies to learn about the Kalapuya people who lived in the Springfield area of Western Oregon. I went to the Natural History Museum in Eugene, read the book, The World of the Kalapuya, A Native people of Western Oregon, and Indians of the Pacific Northwest, and I listened carefully to Esther Stutzman, a Kalapuya elder when she shared the information that her people are still here and have not vanished. Like her, I feel it is essential that people understand Native Americans have been here for thousands of years and that we continue our commitment to our culture, place, and the natural world that nurtures us to this day.
    [Show full text]