DOCSLIB.ORG

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment of Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems in the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment of Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems in the U.S United States Department of Agriculture Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment of Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems in the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Janine R. Rice, Linda A. Joyce, Claudia Regan, David Winters, Rick Truex Forest Service General Technical Report Rocky Mountain Research Station RMRS-GTR-376 June 2018 Rice, J.R.; Joyce, L.A.; Regan, C.; Winters, D.; Truex, R. 2018. Climate change vulnerability assessment of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems in the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-376. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 216 p. Abstract Vulnerability assessments are important tools to assist in climate adaptation planning. Six priority ecosystems were identified in the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region: alpine turf and dwarf-shrubland; aquatic, riparian, and wetland ecosystems in glaciated valleys; subalpine spruce-fir; low-gradient mountain stream reaches; ponderosa pine; and Great Plains streams and riparian areas. Vulnerability to nonclimate and climate stressors for these priority ecosystems is assessed. Criteria used to assess vulnerability include ecosystem traits related to the sensitivity and adaptive capacity of the ecosystem. We engaged scientists through an expert review to vet the vulnerability rankings and confidence in the assessment. Aquatic ecosystems were the most vulnerable priority ecosystem, and alpine ecosystems had higher vulnerability than lower elevation terrestrial ecosystems. The narrative for each priority ecosystem describes the nature of the vulnerability to climate change. Keywords: low-gradient mountain stream; subalpine spruce-fir; aquatic, riparian, and wetland ecosystems in glaciated valleys; alpine turf and dwarf-shrubland; Great Plains stream reach; ponderosa pine Cover photos by Robert Rice. All Rocky Mountain Research Station publications are published by U.S. Forest Service employees and are in the public domain and available at no cost. Even though U.S. Forest Service publications are not copyrighted, they are formatted according to U.S. Department of Agriculture standards and research findings and formatting cannot be altered in reprints. Altering content or formatting, including the cover and title page, is strictly prohibited. Acknowledgments We would like to acknowledge funding from the USFS Climate Change Advisor’s Office. We thank Hector Galbraith for his assistance in using his vulnerability assessment method and critiquing our modifications for the Rocky Mountain Region. We also acknowledge Lisa-Natalie Anjozian for her editing on the draft narratives. We acknowledge, in particular, the technical experts who reviewed the narratives and assessed the vulnerability and confidence for each narrative: Gregor Auble, Michael Battaglia, Jill Baron, William Bowman, Shannon Brewer, Jonathan Coop, Kate Dwire, Kelly Elder, Hector Galbraith, Carol Howe, Andrew Kratz, Noah Molotch, Robert Musselman, Jason Neff, Laura Perry, David Peterson, Leroy Poff, Frank Rahel, William Romme, Wayne Shepperd, Thomas Veblen, Mark Weinhold, and Ellen Wohl. We appreciate greatly the three reviewers who reviewed the entire General Technical Report: Greg Aplet, Sarah Sawyer, and Robert Hall. We would also like to thank Cynthia Moser for her careful editing of the final draft of the manuscript. Authors Janine R. Rice is a Research Ecologist with Rice Consulting LLC in Fort Collins, Colorado. Linda A. Joyce is a Research Ecologist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Human Dimensions Research Program in Fort Collins, Colorado. Claudia Regan was the Regional Ecologist in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Regional Office in Golden, Colorado. David Winters (retired) was the Regional Fisheries Program Manager and Aquatic Ecologist in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Regional Office in Golden, Colorado. Rick Truex is the Regional Wildlife Program Leader in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Regional Office in Golden, Colorado. Contents Chapter 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 Janine R. Rice and Linda A. Joyce Assessing Vulnerability ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Assessing Vulnerability of Priority Ecosystems in the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region ...........................................2 Regional Focus and Priority Ecosystems of the Rocky Mountain Region ........................................................................2 Vulnerability Assessment Framework, Expert Review, Manager Workshop ....................................................................3 Intended Audience and Potential Uses ....................................................................................................................................6 References ..............................................................................................................................................................................7 Chapter 2. Climate Overview for the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region ...................9 Linda A. Joyce and Janine R. Rice Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Recent and Historical Climate—State-Level Summaries ........................................................................................ 10 Historical and Recent Climate at the Scale of a National Forest ............................................................................. 14 Projecting Climate Over the Next 100 Years .......................................................................................................... 14 Modeling the Climate .................................................................................................................................................14 Understanding Climate Scenarios and Projections ......................................................................................................15 Climate Projections for the Rocky Mountain Region....................................................................................................16 Changing Climate, Changing Risks ........................................................................................................................ 17 References ............................................................................................................................................................ 21 Chapter 3. Alpine Turf and Dwarf-Shrubland Ecosystems: Vulnerability to Nonclimate and Climate Stressors in the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region .........................23 Janine R. Rice, Claudia Regan, Dave Winters, Rick Truex, and Linda A. Joyce Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 Vulnerability of Alpine Turf and Dwarf-Shrubland Ecosystems to Nonclimate Stressors ......................................... 27 Summary of Key Vulnerabilities to Nonclimate Stressors .............................................................................................27 Current Status and Human Influences ................................................................................................................... 28 Invasive and Nonnative Species ..................................................................................................................................29 Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition ...............................................................................................................................29 Dust on Snow .............................................................................................................................................................29 Intrinsic Resilience of Ecosystem to Nonclimate Stressors ..................................................................................... 30 Factors that Enhance Resilience to Nonclimate Stressors .............................................................................................30 Factors That Lower Resilience to Nonclimate Stressors ................................................................................................30 Future Trends of Nonclimate Stressors ................................................................................................................... 31 Vulnerability of Alpine Turf and Dwarf-Shrubland Ecosystems to Climate Stressors ................................................ 31 Capacity for Range Shift ..............................................................................................................................................31 Elevation Potential for Range Shift ...............................................................................................................................32 Ecosystem Connectivity ..............................................................................................................................................32 Vulnerability of Cold-adapted, Foundation, or Keystone Species to Climate Change
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Southern California
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Southern California Climate and Vegetation Over the Past 125,000 Years from Lake Sequences in the San Bernardino Mountains A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography by Katherine Colby Glover 2016 © Copyright by Katherine Colby Glover 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Southern California Climate and Vegetation Over the Past 125,000 Years from Lake Sequences in the San Bernardino Mountains by Katherine Colby Glover Doctor of Philosophy in Geography University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Glen Michael MacDonald, Chair Long sediment records from offshore and terrestrial basins in California show a history of vegetation and climatic change since the last interglacial (130,000 years BP). Vegetation sensitive to temperature and hydroclimatic change tended to be basin-specific, though the expansion of shrubs and herbs universally signalled arid conditions, and landscpe conversion to steppe. Multi-proxy analyses were conducted on two cores from the Big Bear Valley in the San Bernardino Mountains to reconstruct a 125,000-year history for alpine southern California, at the transition between mediterranean alpine forest and Mojave desert. Age control was based upon radiocarbon and luminescence dating. Loss-on-ignition, magnetic susceptibility, grain size, x-ray fluorescence, pollen, biogenic silica, and charcoal analyses showed that the paleoclimate of the San Bernardino Mountains was highly subject to globally pervasive forcing mechanisms that register in northern hemispheric oceans. Primary productivity in Baldwin Lake during most of its ii history showed a strong correlation to historic fluctuations in local summer solar radiation values.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlook on Climate Change Adaptation in the Tropical Andes Mountains
    MOUNTAIN ADAPTATION OUTLOOK SERIES Outlook on climate change adaptation in the Tropical Andes mountains 1 Southern Bogota, Colombia photo: cover Front DISCLAIMER The development of this publication has been supported by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in the context of its inter-regional project “Climate change action in developing countries with fragile mountainous ecosystems from a sub-regional perspective”, which is financially co-supported by the Government Production Team of Austria (Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Tina Schoolmeester, GRID-Arendal Environment and Water Management). Miguel Saravia, CONDESAN Magnus Andresen, GRID-Arendal Julio Postigo, CONDESAN, Universidad del Pacífico Alejandra Valverde, CONDESAN, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú Matthias Jurek, GRID-Arendal Björn Alfthan, GRID-Arendal Silvia Giada, UNEP This synthesis publication builds on the main findings and results available on projects and activities that have been conducted. Contributors It is based on available information, such as respective national Angela Soriano, CONDESAN communications by countries to the United Nations Framework Bert de Bievre, CONDESAN Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and peer-reviewed Boris Orlowsky, University of Zurich, Switzerland literature. It is based on review of existing literature and not on new Clever Mafuta, GRID-Arendal scientific results generated through the project. Dirk Hoffmann, Instituto Boliviano de la Montana - BMI Edith Fernandez-Baca, UNDP The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the Eva Costas, Ministry of Environment, Ecuador views or policies of UNEP, contributory organizations or any Gabriela Maldonado, CONDESAN governmental authority or institution with which its authors or Harald Egerer, UNEP contributors are affiliated, nor do they imply any endorsement.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Cores: Unlocking Past Climates Module 1: Climate and Ice
    Ice Cores: Unlocking Past Climates Module 1: Climate and Ice Overview Part I of this lesson begins with a video that explains the difference between weather and climate, describes glacier formation, and identifies the types of information that can be found in the glacial record. The video is followed by an exploration of current weather conditions at various locations around the world. The locations represent a variety of climate types and each is located near a glacier or ice sheet. Students then differentiate between weather and climate and examine climate data for their location. In Part II students visit websites to learn what glaciers are and how they are formed. Students conduct additional internet research in Part III to discover what types of substances can be trapped in glaciers. In the final activity students locate a glacier or ice sheet closest to the city they collected weather data for and create a model that tells the story of several years in the life of their glacier. The story includes weather information and information about any natural or human-induced events that contributed materials to the glacier’s record. Content Objectives Students will Differentiate between weather and climate Investigate how glaciers are formed and where they are found Build a glacier model that illustrates several years of the glacial record Grade Level: 5-8 Suggested Time: 2-3 class periods Multimedia Resources [link to video] http://www.wunderground.com/ http://www.weatherbase.com The Life Cycle of a Glacier, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/vinson/glac-flash.html How Glaciers Work, http://science.howstuffworks.com/glacier.htm Glacier Formation, http://science.howstuffworks.com/glacier1.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Climate Change Effects on Mountain Ecosystems Through a Cross-Site Analysis in the Alps and Apennines
    Assessment of climate change effects on mountain ecosystems through a cross-site analysis in the Alps and Apennines. Rogora M.1*a, Frate L.2a, Carranza M.L.2a, Freppaz M.3a, Stanisci A.2a, Bertani I.4, Bottarin R.5, Brambilla A.6, Canullo R.7, Carbognani M.8, Cerrato C.9, Chelli S.7, Cremonese E.10, Cutini M.11, Di Musciano M.12, Erschbamer B.13, Godone D.14, Iocchi M.11, Isabellon M.3,10, Magnani A.15, Mazzola L.16, Morra di Cella U.17, Pauli H.18, Petey M.17, Petriccione B.19, Porro F.20, Psenner R.5, 21, Rossetti G.22, Scotti A.5, Sommaruga R.21, Tappeiner U.5, Theurillat J.-P.23, Tomaselli M.8, Viglietti D.3, Viterbi R.9, Vittoz P.24, Winkler M.18 Matteucci G.25a *Corresponding author: e-mail address: [email protected] (M. Rogora) a joint first authors 1 CNR Institute of Ecosystem Study, Verbania Pallanza, Italy 2 DIBT, Envix-Lab, University of Molise, Pesche (IS), Italy 3 DISAFA, NatRisk, University of Turin, Grugliasco (TO), Turin, Italy 4 Graham Sustainability Institute, University of Michigan, 625 E. Liberty St., Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA 5 Eurac Research, Institute for Alpine Environment, Bolzano (BZ), Italy 6 Alpine Wilidlife Research Centre, Gran Paradiso National Park, Degioz (AO) 11 Valsavarenche, Italy; Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich. Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland 7 School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, Plant Diversity and Ecosystems Management Unit, University of Camerino (MC) Italy 8 Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability University of Parma, Parma, Italy 9 Alpine Wilidlife Research Centre, Gran Paradiso National Park, Degioz (AO) 11 Valsavarenche, Italy 10 Environmental Protection Agency of Aosta Valley, ARPA VdA, Climate Change Unit, Aosta, Italy 11 Department of Biology, University of Roma Tre, Viale G.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Tundra Zone
    Chapter 18: Alpine Tundra Zone by J. Pojar and A.C. Stewart LOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION .......................................... 264 ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS .............................................. 264 SUBZONES ............................................................... 268 SOME REPRESENTATIVE SITE ASSOCIATIONS ........................... 268 Dwarf willow Ð Small-awned sedge ..................................... 268 Entire-leaved mountain-avens Ð Blackish locoweed ...................... 270 Altai fescue Ð Mountain sagewort Ð Cetraria ........................... 270 Barratt's willow Ð Sweet coltsfoot ...................................... 271 WILDLIFE HABITATS ..................................................... 271 RESOURCE VALUES ...................................................... 273 LITERATURE CITED ...................................................... 274 263 LOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION The Alpine Tundra zone (AT) occurs on high mountains throughout the province (Figure 65). In southeastern British Columbia, the AT occurs at elevations above approximately 2250 m; in the southwest, above 1650 m; in the northeast, above 1400 m; in the northwest, above 1000 m. The zone is concentrated along the coastal mountains and in the northern and southeastern parts of the province and occurs above all three subalpine zones. The AT extends beyond British Columbia on the high mountains to the north, east, and south. ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS The harsh alpine climate is cold, windy, and snowy, and characterized by low growing season temperatures and a very short frost-free period (Table 4). British Columbia has only two long-term, alpine climate stations: Old Glory Mountain, near Trail (Figure 66) and Mt. Fidelity in Glacier National Park. Available short- and long-term data indicate that the mean annual temperature ranges from -4 to 0°C. The average temperature remains below 0°C for 7-11 months. Frost can occur at any time. The AT is the only zone in the province where the mean temperature of the warmest month is less than 10°C.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatic Records and Linkage Along an Altitudinal Gradient in the Southern
    Journal of Nepal Geological Society, 2017, Vol. 53, pp. 47-56. Climatic records and linkage along an altitudinal gradient in the southern slope of Nepal Himalaya Climatic records and linkage along an altitudinal gradient in the southern slope of Nepal Himalaya Binod Dawadi Kathmandu Center for Research and Education (KCRE) Chinese Academy of Sciences-Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu Nepal Central Department of Hydrology and Meteorology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu 44613, Nepal (Email: [email protected]; [email protected]) ABSTRACT To validate the climatic linkages under different topographic conditions, observational climate data at four automated weather stations (AWS) in different elevations, ranging from 130 m asl. to 5050 m asl., on the southern slope of the Nepal Himalayas was examined. the variation of means and distribution of daily, 5-days, 10-days, and monthly average/sum of temperature/ precipitation between the stations in the different elevation was observed. Despite these differences, the temperatures records are consistent in different altitudes, and highly correlated to each other while the precipitation data shows comparatively weaker correlation. The slopes (0.79-1.18) with (R2 >0.64) in the regression models for high Mountain to high Himalaya except in November and 0.56-1.14 (R2 >0.50) for mid-hill and high Mountain except January, December, June indicate the similar rate of fluctuation of temperature between the stations in the respective region. These strong linkages and the similar range of fluctuation of temperature in the different elevation indicate the possibilities of their use of lower elevation temperature data to represent the higher elevation sites for paleoclimatic calibration.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Forest Ecosystems
    Santa Ana Basin Climate and Forest Newsletter Date Ecosystems Results Projected climate change impacts on forest ecosystems: While there is significant variability between climate change scenarios, all projections include increased temperature and increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide. As a result, the following general trends are predicted: Warmer temperatures will cause trees to Key Findings move northward and to higher elevations Changes in total forest cover for California Warmer temperatures will likely are projected by one study to range from a cause Jeffrey pines to move to 25% decrease to a 23% increase by 2100 higher elevations and may de- crease their total habitat. (Lenihan et al., 2008) Species with the smallest geographical and Forest health my also be influ- climate ranges are expected to be the most enced by changes in the magni- vulnerable to change tude and frequency of wildfires or Extended droughts and earlier snowmelt infestations. could cause fire season to start earlier and Alpine ecosystems are vulnerable last longer (California, 2010) to climate change because they Temperature increases may change the Figure 1 - Fig. 4 from Lenihan et al. 2008. Percent change in total land cover have little ability to expand to frequency and magnitude of pest infesta- for vegetation classes by 2010 for three climate change scenarios predicted using the MC1 Dynamic Vegetation Model. higher elevations. tions such as the pine beetle Across the state it is projected How will the Jeffrey Pine ecosystem be impacted? that alpine forests will decrease in area by 50-70% by 2100. The Jeffery Pine is a high altitude Coniferous evergreen tree that can occupy a range of sites and cli- mate conditions (Moore, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Alpine Plants for Climate Change: the North American GLORIA Project
    Monitoring Alpine Plants for Climate Change: The North American GLORIA Project Connie Millar (USFS, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Albany, CA) and Dan Fagre (USGS, Glacier Field Station, W Glacier, MT) Alpine Environments Figure 1. Laying out standard 3 m x 3 m grids. Globally, alpine environments are hotspots of biodiversity, often harboring higher diversity of plant species than corresponding areas at lower elevations. These regions are also likely to experience more severe and rapid change in climate than lowlands under conditions of anthropogenic warming (Theurillat & Guisan 2001; Halloy & Mark 2003; Pickering & Armstrong 2003). Such climatic effects are already being documented by instrumental monitoring in the few places in western North America where long-term climate stations are available at high elevations. New sites are being planned (see GCOS article, pg 15). Climate Change is augmenting concern for alpine vegetation because available habitat diminishes at increasingly higher elevations. This creates an “elevational squeeze,” whereby the geometry of mountain peaks means that escape routes to cooler environments uphill are dead ends for migrating alpine spe- cies. While monitoring and modeling efforts have begun to elucidate climate of alpine a. Seward Mountain summit (2717 m), Glacier National Park, MT Target environments in North America, very little is known about corresponding responses Region; 39 species were tallied on of alpine plant species to changing climate. Indeed, for many mountain regions in the this summit. West, little information exists even about alpine plant distribution and abundance. Monitoring Alpine Plants; the GLORIA Approach The Global Observation Initiative in Alpine Environments (GLORIA; http://www. gloria.ac.at/) is an international science program based in Vienna, Austria that pro- motes monitoring responses of high-elevation plants to long-term climate change worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plants and Establishing the GLORIA Long-Term Climate Change Monitoring Protocol in the Alpine Sweetwater
    Rare Plants and Establishing the GLORIA Long-Term Climate Change Monitoring Protocol in the Alpine Sweetwater Mountains of Mono County, California Mark Darrach1, Adelia Barber2, Elizabeth Bergstrom3, Constance Millar4 1Corydalis Consulting, Pendleton, OR, 2University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 3USDA Forest Service, Humboldt-Toiyabe N.F., Carson City, NV, 4USDA Forest Service, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Albany, CA Abstract The GLORIA alpine climate monitoring program is a worldwide effort aimed at documenting precise vegetation changes - both compositional and as a function of cover - over time in alpine settings using a set protocol with permanent monumented multi-summit plots across a low to high alpine elevational gradient below the nival zone. While the program is still in its nascent stages in North America, several permanent GLORIA stations are now established in the California Sierra Nevada target region, including the White Mountains, Mt. Dunderberg, and Freel Peak south of Lake Tahoe. The GLORIA effort now includes a newly-established station in the Sweetwater Mountains of Mono County, California as of mid-July 2012. The Sweetwater Mountains comprise a spectacular suite of summits above timberline that offer the opportunity to observe the temporal and spatial progression of climate-induced modifications to vegetation on a unique geological substrate. Above timberline the Sweetwater Mountains displays one of the most botanically diverse and significant concentrations of rare vascular plants in an alpine setting in the continental United States, if not all of North America. The novel geologic setting of highly geothermally argillized acidic volcanic rocks at high elevation has allowed for the presence of a robust clay component in soils throughout the alpine portion of the range.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Data on the Climate of the Alpine Vegetation Belt of Eastern Lesotho
    Bothalia 12, 3: 567-572 (1978) Further data on the climate of the Alpine Vegetation Belt of eastern Lesotho D. J. B. KILLICK* ABSTRACT Rainfall data from 31 stations in the Alpine Vegetation Belt of eastern Lesotho, together with temperature, relative humidity and evaporation data from Letseng-la-Draai are presented and discussed, and comparisons, where possible, are made with data from Mokhotlong in the Subalpine Belt. RÉSUMÉ DONNÉES NOUVELLES SUR LE CLIMAT DE LA CEINTURE DE LESOTHO D’EST Les données de la pluviosité de 31 postes dans la ceinture de vegetation alpine de Lesotho d’est, ensemble avec la température, la humidité relative et les données de Vevaporation de Letseng-la-Draai, sont presentées et discutées, et des comparaisons sont fait, ou c ’est possible, avec les données de Mokhotlong de la ceinture sous- alpine. INTRODUCTION 1944/45 only 439,3 mm, while at Station B the figures In 1963 the author pointed out that climatic data are 1 663 mm for 1956/57 and 701 mm for 1965/66. for the Alpine Vegetation Belt of the Drakensberg Most of the rain (77%) falls between October and and Lesotho were meagre. This was certainly true of March. The percentage mean monthly rainfall as published data. However, today there exists a con­ calculated by Carter for 16 rain-gauges (A-Oxbow siderable amount of data, particularly rainfall data, Met. Stn.) over a 10-year period is given in Table 2. much of it apparently still unpublished, which is Three of the stations are situated slightly below the derived chiefly from hydrological investigations in lower limit of the Alpine Belt, but this should not connection with the Oxbow Dam scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Sensing of 2000–2016 Alpine Spring Snowline Elevation in Dall Sheep Mountain Ranges of Alaska and Western Canada
    remote sensing Article Remote Sensing of 2000–2016 Alpine Spring Snowline Elevation in Dall Sheep Mountain Ranges of Alaska and Western Canada David Verbyla 1,* ID , Troy Hegel 2, Anne W. Nolin 3, Madelon van de Kerk 4, Thomas A. Kurkowski 5 and Laura R. Prugh 4 ID 1 School of Natural Resources and Extension, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA 2 Yukon Department of Environment, Whitehorse, YT Y1A 4Y9, Canada; [email protected] 3 College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] 4 School of Environmental and Forestry Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; [email protected] (M.v.d.K.); [email protected] (L.R.P.) 5 Scenarios Network for Alaska and Arctic Planning, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-907-474-5553 Received: 18 August 2017; Accepted: 7 November 2017; Published: 11 November 2017 Abstract: The lowest elevation of spring snow (“snowline”) is an important factor influencing recruitment and survival of wildlife in alpine areas. In this study, we assessed the spatial and temporal variability of alpine spring snowline across major Dall sheep mountain areas in Alaska and northwestern Canada. We used a daily MODIS snow fraction product to estimate the last day of 2000–2016 spring snow for each 500-m pixel within 28 mountain areas. We then developed annual (2000–2016) regression models predicting the elevation of alpine snowline during mid-May for each mountain area. MODIS-based regression estimates were compared with estimates derived using a Normalized Difference Snow Index from Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) surface reflectance data.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Action Plan 2.0 Imprint
    CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 2.0 IMPRINT Permanent Secretariat of the Alpine Convention Herzog-Friedrich-Straße 15 6020 Innsbruck Austria Branch office Viale Druso / Drususallee 1 39100 Bolzano / Bozen Italy The Climate Action Plan 2.0 was developed by the Alpine Climate Board of the Alpine Convention, on the basis of a draft prepared by Helen Lückge (Climonomics) and with inputs from the Contracting Parties, Observers, Thematic Working Bodies, the Permanent Secretariat of the Alpine Convention and other experts. The work of the Alpine Climate Board of the Alpine Convention was funded by Austria, Germany and Switzerland. www.alpineclimate2050.org [email protected] Translations: ALPS-LaRete Graphic design: Mauro Sutter Design Printing: Sterndruck, Fügen, Austria Photographs: Moritz Kaser (cover photo), Hannes Schlosser (transport), Alessandro Sciascia (energy), Antonino Ferigo (tourism), Giada Stefanoni (natural hazards), Andreas Hollinger (water), Jan Skobe (spatial planning), Lara Hochreiter (soil), Anže Jenko (mountain agriculture), Thomas Engl (mountain forests), Michelle Bommassar (ecosystems and biodiversity). © Permanent Secretariat of the Alpine Convention, 2021. 2 Climate Action Plan 2.0 Alpine Convention PREFACE “Hope is not a strategy.” Vince Lombardi, original source unknown We, the undersigned, fully subscribe to this quote – indeed, we are not only hoping but are rather counting on innovative ideas and solutions to combat climate change! To demonstrate this, the Alpine Climate Target System 2050 and the Climate Action Plan 2.0 have been developed as part of a broader strategy towards climate-neutral and climate-resilient Alps by 2050. Climate change requires immediate action in all sectors including energy, transport, mountain agricul- ture, tourism, spatial planning and soil – to name but a few.
    [Show full text]