POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE, WA SDCI#: 3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017
Prepared by: The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP 71 Columbia Street - 6th Floor Seattle, WA 98104 [ PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ] POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017
PROJECT TEAM CONTENTS
Client 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW University of Washington 2 CONTEXT ANALYSIS Design-Builder 3 SITE ANALYSIS Lease Crutcher Lewis | The Miller Hull Partnership 4 SITE DESIGN Landscape Architect 5 DESIGN GUIDELINES Site Workshop 6 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT CMG 7 APPENDIX PROJECT OVERVIEW
UNIVERSITY DISTRICT
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | SEATTLE CAMPUS
SITE
PORTAGE BAY
4 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT OVERVIEW
Project Summary: The University of Washington is poised to accelerate research and advancement in Population Health. The Population Health Facility will serve as a powerful catalyst for the University’s new Population Health Initiative and be an idea laboratory and collaboration incubator. It will house the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, the Department of Global Health, and elements of the School of Public Health, all of which will greatly benefit from close proximity. The facility will also provide central gathering spaces for faculty, students, staff, partners, and visitors from a wide range of disciplines across campus, the region, the nation, and the world to address important global health concerns. The Population Health Facility will be located on the west edge of Central Campus with the northwest corner of the site being a major gateway into campus at the intersection of NE 40th and Grant Place. The estimated size of the facility is 300,000 GSF, with 8-story of above grade space, and 2 partial levels of below-grade space. We anticipate the program to include offices, collaborative group work areas, conference rooms, active learning environments, and technology-rich spaces to accommodate data visualization and online interactive global teaching and training. Other possibilities include street-facing, community-oriented destinations that help activate the neighborhood. Research wet labs are not part of the scope. 15th Ave NE 15th Ave NE 40th St Project Goals: • Foster collaboration and connectivity amongst those working within the facility, with other programs and with researchers at the UW, local and global partners, and students. NE Way University • Promote healthy living within and around the new facility. • Design space that is flexible and adaptable to meet the evolving needs of IHME, DGH, and SPH. • Employ best practices in sustainable building to reduce energy and water use, lower life cycle costs, and improve occupant satisfaction and health. • Support and further the institution-wide Population Health Vision.
Limit of Work: 124,669 Square Feet Number of Parking Stalls: The project is working with UW Transportation Services to determine the required number of ADA parking stalls for the project. The project is currently planning for 2 - 5 parking stalls along Asotin Lane. N
SITE LOCATION
Vicinity Map / Site Location
6 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 2. CONTEXT ANALYSIS CONTEXT ANALYSIS
hin r”
E nt y he CENTRAL EAST CAMPUS CAMPUS WEST . CAMPUS ext lk SOUTH ds CAMPUS
,
d N ty N
N
Figure 10. Regional Context (above) and Figure 3. City of Seattle, Regional Context Neighborhoods around the University and Campus Sector Map Neighborhoods around the University (opposite)
8 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 CONTEXT ANALYSIS
Project Context: The University of Washington main campus in Seattle 2003 Campus Master is situated on the shores of Union and Portage Bays. The physical assets of the campus are located within 50’ Plan Allowable boundaries designated by a Major Institutional Overlay Building Heights (MIO) zone as defined in the City of Seattle Land Use and Figure 60 Zoning Code. The site is located on the Central campus western edge 15th Ave NE with the northwest corner of the site at the intersection of NE 40th and Grant Place. 50’ According to the 2003 Campus Master Plan (CMP), the NE 45th St project is anticipated to be close to the 2003 CMP 105’ building height limit, including a 15’ mechanical penthouse over the height limit. 80’
15th Ave NE 15th Ave 160’
65’ NE 41st St 37’ 105’ 105’
65’ 65’ 160’ Montlake Blvd NE 200’ Shoreline District Overlay 30 ft 50’ 200’ Wetland Buffer
University Bridge NE Pacific St MIO 37 105’ MIO 50
37’ 107’ MIO 65 105’ MIO 80 160’ MIO 105 65’ MIO 107 240’ N MIO 160
MIO 240 SITE BOUNDARY Existing Conditions - October 2016 Draft Plan 73 Zoning Map
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 9 Significant landscapes are identified in the Campus Landscape Framework Plan, and Pedestrian Paths/Plazas CONTEXT ANALYSISfunction as primary open spaces with cultural Significant Open Spaces and historic value. Significant landscapes identified on the accompanying graphic Burke-Gilman Trail Unique and significantare plannedLandscape: to be preserved as part of the Campus Master Plan. Significant landscapes are identified. They function as primary open spaces with cultural and historic value. No unique or significant landscape exist on the proposed site.
Unique and Significant Landscapes Figure 23 UNIQUE AND SIGNIFICANT LANDSCAPES N Significant landscapes are identified in the Campus Landscape Framework Plan, and Pedestrian Paths/Plazas function as primary open spaces with cultural Significant Open Spaces and historic value. Significant landscapes identified on the accompanying graphic Existing Conditions - October 2016 DraftBurke-Gilman Plan Trail 45 are planned to be preserved as part of the SITE BOUNDARY Campus Master Plan.
10 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 3. SITE ANALYSIS
SITE ANALYSIS N
N N
Partial Campus Plan of University of Washington Aerial of Project Site
12 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 SITE ANALYSIS SITE ANALYSIS
GEORGE WASHINGTON LANE Existing Topography The site’s existing topography slopes predominantly South-West with a high point of 130’ at the intersection of NE Grant Lane and W Stevens Way NE and a lowpoint of approximately 85’ at the SW corner of the site. An existing retaining wall along 15th Avenue NE holds the existing Annex buildings several feet above the street. SCHMITZ Due to this challenging topography and the location of existing buildings HALL and the Guthrie Annexes, many routes through the site are not accessible, including the majority of the sidewalk along Grant Lane NE and W Stevens Way NE and Asotin Place between Architecture Hall and Guthrie. NE 40TH MEANY HALL 1 9% The Population Health Facility is proposed to be located to work with + 106.5’ existing grades, resulting in building entries at three different floor plates: NE GRANT LANE SW entry at level 88.5’, NW and SE entries at 101.5’ and NE entry at (1) NE 40th & 15th Ave Intersection 114.5’. 15TH AVE NE 7.5% GOULD HALL + 130’ + 101’ + 111’ 10%
+ 118.5’ 4% 3% ARCHITECTURE HALL MOLECULAR PROPOSED SCIENCE POPULATION HEALTH + 105’ 5% POLICE BUILDING STATION 9% (2) Stairs to Physics/ Astronomy + 106’ ASOTIN PLACE+ 113’ 3 W STEVENS WAY NE WEST RECEIVING STATION + 100’ GUTHRIE HALL + 85’ 2 + 99’
PHYSICS N Existing Site Condition (3) Asotin Lane
1 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW AUGUST 23, 2017 LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 13 SITE ANALYSIS SITE ANALYSIS
Existing Bicycle Circulation GEORGE WASHINGTONGEORGE LANE
EXISTING BICYCLE ROUTES
SCHMITZ EXISTING BICYCLE PARKING HALL FACILITIES
NE 40TH MEANY HALL Primary bicycle circulation into the Population Health Facility site is from the 4 two-way protected bike lane on NE 40th (See Image 3) and from sharrows 3 on Okanogan Lane, W Stevens Way NE and Grant Lane NE. Currently, the (1) Existing parking lot commonly used as bicycle route. NE GRANT LANE C8 parking lot (See Image 1) and its driveway are the primary bicycle route through the site. Though there are no bicycle facilities on 15th Ave NE, this roadway is occasionally used by skilled cyclists. 15TH AVE NE Bicycle parking is currently located at three locations around Architecture Hall and along the south edge of Guthrie Hall. Physics has located some of its bike GOULD 1 parking within its loading dock. HALL
ARCHITECTUREHALL 2 MOLECULAR PROPOSED SCIENCE POPULATION HEALTH POLICE BUILDING STATION (2) Existing bicycle parking at Architecture Hall
ASOTIN PLACE
WEST
RECEIVING W STEVENS WAY NE STATION GUTHRIE HALL
PHYSICS N
(3) Existing two-way protected bicycle lanes on NE 40th St. (4) Existing sharrow on Grant Lane NE.
14 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON : POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 2 1 TRANSPORTATION /MOTOR POOL. 4659 SITE ANALYSIS 4534-1/2 SITE ANALYSIS
4522
2 4518 PLANT SERVICES 4525
GEORGE WASHINGTONGEORGE LANE Existing Pedestrian & ADA Circulation 4516 4512 1100
4507 EXISTINGRUSSIAN PEDESTRIAN ROUTE HOUSE
3 1415 1107 UW TOWER BLDG. O UW TOWER UW TOWER BLDG. T BLDG. A HANSEE HALL EXISTING ADA ACCESSIBLE BURKE W45 MEMORIAL HUGHES PARKING UW BOOK MUSEUM PENTHOUSE GARAGE STORE THEODOR THEATRE SCHMITZ JACOBSEN UW TOWER OBSERVATORY ROUTE BLDG. C W46 ARCHERY RANGE HALL PARKING COLLEGIANA GARAGE UW TOWER 4 BLDG. S GATE HOUSE 2 Pedestrian circulation into the site has a variety of experiences depending on
NE 40TH NORTH PHYSICS MEANY HALL from where the site is entered: LABORATORY DENNY FIELD
BANK OF AMERICA EXECUTIVE NE 40th & 15th Ave NE- This intersection is a scramble with a signalization EDUCATION HUTCHINSON CENTER HALL DENNY FIELD 5 909 WILLIAM H. cycle of East-West vehiclesTENNIS > PedestrianHAGGETT Scramble HALL > North- South Vehicles. NE GRANT LANE GATES HALL COURTS
HAGGETT PARKING DEMPSEY GARAGE PACCAR HALL HALL DENNY FIELD (1) Tree in sidewalk along Grant Place NE Grant LaneTENNIS COURTS - Each side of the street has a sidewalk that has no buffer from ROOSEVELT II HAGGETT HALL SHOP 4245 the roadway. CurrentlyLEWIS HALL there is not a direct ADA pathCYCLOTRON along NE Grant Lane 15TH AVE NE
MacKENZIE into Central Campus. An existing Ponderosa Pine has impacted the sidewalk 6 1 HALL creating a difficult surface to navigate (See Image 1). ROOSEVELT I ART BLDG. GOULD 4225 GATE HOUSE 3
DENNY HALL INTELLECTUAL McMAHON HALL EAGLESON C8 Parking Lot - The mostHOUSE frequently used path through the site has PARKING HALL GARAGE PARRINGTON LAWN pedestrians walking through the C8 parking lot that connects the corner of NE
4201 McMAHON HALL McMAHON DENNY YARD RAITT HALL 40th St and 15th Ave NE to Guthrie, Architecture Hall, Physics, and Stevens 7 Way. MUSIC BLDG. CLARK HALL
Cedar 15th Ave NE - The sidewalk along 15th Ave NE has a retaining wall that Cedar HALL Apts. PARRINGTON
Apts. HEARING West SPEECH & East SOCIALWORK/ SAVERY steps withMILLER the slope creating an impenetrable edge to the campus. The HALL ARCHITECTUREHALL MOLECULAR CUNNINGHAM HALL WAR MEMORIAL HALL C FLAGPOLE 4100 OLD QUAD entrance to the shared Guthrie Hall and Physics Astronomy Building loading FLOYD AND DELORES 4150 8POPULATION SCIENCE JONES PLAYHOUSE GATE HOUSE 1 THEATER PADELFORD dock is located at theBLDG south edgeB of the site. The loading dock is framed PADELFORD COMMUNICATIONS HEALTH PARKING CONDON HALL by vegetation and two stairways that connect 15thGARAGE to an upper courtyard. 4041 1100 Poplar ELM SMITH Hall SCHMITZ HALL KANE HALL THOMSON Hall HALL ODEGAARD There is an existingHALL mid-block crossingA of 15th Ave NE at the south end of UNDERGRADUATE GOWEN HALL GALLERY LIBRARY POLICE HENRY ART the site that provides pedestrians from West Campus access to the stairways GRIEG STATION adjacentGARDEN to the loading dock entrance.HALL HEALTH CENTER 9 CENTRAL COMMODORE- PARKING DUCHESS GARAGE TERRY HALL MAPLE HALL LANDER HALL ALLEN HUB YARD RED SUZZALLO ASOTIN PLACE CENTER FOR LIBRARY 2 (2) Sidewalk along 15th AveVISUAL ARTS SQUARE FLUKE HALL
MEANY HALL
BENJAMIN HALL PUBLICATION UW RESEARCH SERVICES GATE CLUB BLDG. HENDERSON HOUSE 5 GERBERDING HALL HALL ALLEN LIBRARY W STEVENS W STEVENS WAY NE STUDENT UNION 10 COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICES INSTRUCTIONAL BLDG. DESIGN CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTER/ (HUB) THEATER BUILDING UNIVERSITY
BLDG.
ETHNIC DRAMA CENTER FACILITIES WEST CULTURAL
NORTHLAKE SCENE
CENTER PLANT
CHILDRENS INSTRUCTIONAL SHOP GOULD HALL OPERATIONS MERCER COURT GUTHRIE CENTER ANNEX ANNEX 4 ANNEXES 668 SW MAINT 2 THRU 6 RECEIVING APTS SIEG HALL BLDG. 5 BEHAVIORAL MARY GATES GUTHRIE HALL RESEARCH IMA TENNIS TRAIL ANNEX 3 1 AND THERAPY COURTS NORTH IMA SPORTS BUILDING
BROOKLYN STATION GUTHRIE HALL CLINICS WCTL JOHNSON ENGINEERING 2 ARCHITECTURE GUGGENHEIM 4 FIELD 3 RECEPTION L HALL ANNEX HALL LIBRARY 3 ENGINEERINGMOLECULAR AERONAUT. PSYCHOLOGY KIRSTEN 11 WRITING GUTHRIE ANNEX 2 BLDG. LAB. CENTER GUGGENHEIM 2 A AERODYN. 6 K LAB HALL
ACCOUNTING PURCHASING AND M BLDG. B LOEW HALL BC EAST STEVENS COURT RECEIVING AEROSPACE GUTHRIE & ENGR. RESEARCH STATION
BLDG. ANNEX 1 GUTHRIE HALL PLANT J ATMOSPHERIC D OPERATIONS CHEMISTRY SCIENCES- C GEOPHYS. LIBRARY DRUMHELLER 3900 WEST PARKING FOUNTAIN RECEIVING GARAGE STATION INTRAMURAL PHYSICS/ASTRONOMY ACTIVITIES 12 ANNEX BLDG. ELECTRICAL POWER PLANT
BLDG. BLDG.
ENGINEERING MECHANICAL
ENGINEERING
BAGLEY HALL MECHANICAL FISHERIES ENGINEERING SCIENCE BLDG PORTAGE BAY TOWER PAUL G. ALLEN PHYSICS PARKING CENTER FOR FACILITY COMPUTER SCIENCE & N ENGINEERING
HALL BENSON HALL
JOHN M
WALLACE GRAVES CHEMISTRY HALL BLDG. IMA TENNIS 13 UW Accessibility Map AUDITORIUM COURTS SOUTH FISHERIES CB PLANT 3901 TEACHING OPERATIONS RESEARCH OCEAN MARINE RESEARCH KINCAID HALL ANNEX 7 STUDIES BLDG. 2 MORE HALL
BRYANTS BUILDING 3716 BRYANTS GRAVES 3 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW AUGUST 23, 2017 3710 LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY ANNEX 15 ANNEX
FOEGE HITCHCOCK ROBERTS SPORTS BUILDING OVERPASS ANNEX HEC MEDICINE EDMUNDSON CLINIC 14 MUELLER PAVILION A HITCHCOCK HS ROBERTSHALL WILCOX H HALL ANNEX 4 HEC U of W EDMUNDSON SAKUMA PARK B PAVILION POOL C ANDERSON HALL NORDST SITE ANALYSIS SITE ANALYSIS GEORGE WASHINGTON LANE
Existing Vehicle Circulation
EXISTING VEHICLE CIRCULATION SCHMITZ HALL EXISTING PARKING & LOADING NE 40TH MEANY HALL DOCKS
NE GRANT LANE EXISTING BUS STOPS (1) Physic Building Loading Dock Entrance 15TH AVE NE Vehicles currently use 15th Ave NE, NE Grant Lane, and W Stevens Way NE for accessing the site and existing loading docks. The C8 parking lot, GOULD located between Architecture Hall and Guthrie Annexes 1-3, is accessed from HALL Stevens Way using Asotin Place and has 17 parking stalls, including 5 ADA C8 stalls. The Architecture Hall loading dock is accessed from Asotin Place and PARKING is exterior to the building. The Physics/Astronomy and Guthrie Loading dock LOT is accessed from 15th Ave NE and is below grade, underneath an existing landscaped space. POPULATION HEALTH Grant Lane NE to W Stevens Way NE is heavily used by Metro buses. An ARCHITECTURE HALL MOLECULAR SCIENCE existing pair of bus stops is located along Grant Lane NE adjacent to Guthrie 2 Annex 4 and Meany Hall. The Guthrie Annex 4 bus stop shelter is attached to the existing building.
POLICE LOADING STATION DOCK (2) Existing Parking Lot
ASOTIN PLACE
3 W STEVENS WAY NE WEST RECEIVING STATION GUTHRIE HALL
LOADING DOCK 1
PHYSICS N (3) Architecture Hall Loading Dock
16 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON : POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 4 4. SITE DESIGN
)
2
SITE DESIGN 3
) (1
3
3
1
( ) ) 2 33 3 (1
1
( )
32
) 1
1 (
3 ) 1 ) ( 1 )
13 30 1
( (1 9) 1 2 1
(1 ) ) (
8 7 ) ) 1 ( 4 2 2 2 )
1 (1 5 ) 1)
( 2 ) 9 )
3 2 ) ) 2 )
1 2 1 1 )
2 6 0
1 ( 2
( 1 ( 2
26 1 1 1
7
1 1 1
( ( ( ( 1 1 (
(
1
)
)
( 3
1
)
1 4 ) 3 1
1
(
1
( 1 3 1
( 1 ( 9) 0) 12 ) 3 ( ) ) (1 28 127 ) (1 ( 26 0 (1 1 )
1
) 5 ( 3 2
3 1 1 B ( (
G
) 32
(1 ) 8
1
)
)
1 EXISTING TREE PLAN 3
( 3
1
2 1
( 1
) (
1
1
)
1 * Reference arborist report for full evaluation of exsiting trees.
(
2
) 1
) 1
) 1
) )
8 ) ) ) (
) 2 )
6
9 9 ) 2
7 ) 6 4 1 4
2 2 1
2 1 5 5) ( 1 1 2 2 0
1
2 1 1 ( 1 W STEVENS) WAY NE 1 2 1 1 1
( 2 ( 1
( 1 7 ( ( ( 1 ( 1 ( ( 1 ( ( 1 EAST (
GB ) LIMIT OF WORK
1 125
3 TOTAL # OF EXISTING TREES =
1
(
)
0
3
1
) (
4 1
1 ( G
B
) ) )
7 1 3
2 1
)
2 1 5
) 1 1 ( 1 ) ( ) 1 5 ) 0 ( 6 2 4 ( 3 2 1 2 16 1 1 1 # OF EXCEPTIONAL TREES = ( ( ( ( ) ) 9 8 2 2 1 1
( ( )
2
3) )
12 3 5539
( 1 2
1
(
1
( 2 1 2
) 9288
(
)
6
1 1 (
)
) 2 1 9 ( 4
11
( ) 2) 1 4 1 TOTAL # OF TREES TO BE PRESERVED = 1 3 ( 1
(
)
) 2 1 3
( 9289
0
)
1 1 1
5372 2 (
1 )
( 8 )
8
1 2 ) (
1 0 1
3 ) (
1 2 )
( 12
( 9 ) 2 1 7 5376 (
1 )
1 ) 0 ( 2 1 2 ) ( 5 1
1 1 # OF EXCEPTIONAL TREES TO BE PRESERVED = 2
1 ( ( 1 2 1
) (
( 0 1 2 )
1 2 7 )
( 9290
) 2 1 7 (
)
4
2 )
1 3 ( 121 ) 2 TOTAL # OF TREES TO BE REMOVED =
126 ( 1
)
( )
) 2 6 1 ( ) 9
53772 )
7 0 2 7 5) 1 1 2 1 2 (1 1 ( 1 ( ( E 5379 (
) N ) 6 929116 12 1 ( (
21) )
5 2
1 1 A ( ( # OF EXCEPTIONAL TREES TO BE REMOVED = 14 L
)
5
2 )
) 5
1 1 T 1 5378 ( ( 5380 ) 8
1 0
1
2
( )
4 1 2 1 N ( ( 9292
)
ARCHITECTURE HALL 8 GUTHRIE HALL ) 0 4 1 ) 12 A ( ( 7 1
B 1
( G ) 14 R ) (1 6
1
1
0) (
) 2 )
3 1
G 2 ( 5 1 5381( 1
1
(
)
2
2
1 ) ( 13 E GB ) (1 4 1
1 ( N
12)
) (1 1
2
1 ( ) 8
1 B 1 ( ) ASOTIN PLACE NE
G
3
1
1
) (
0
2 1)
1 1
( 9306 (1 ( 2 1 0 )
) )
2 8
1 0
1 1 7 1 1 )
( (
5382 (
)
0 )
)
)
2 9307 0
1 9 8
) 1 (
1 1
1 1
1 1 (
1 ( 9293
1 (
(
) 7 0 1 4680 ( ) 9
B 10
G
) (
0
1 1 (
)
7 GUTHRIE ANNEX 04 0 1 (
)
9 1 1
( )
8 ) ( 9 1 0 0
1
( 8 1 0 (
(DEMO) )
) ) ( 7 1
18) 0
8 (1 4679
1 19) 1 1
( ) 4682 ( 1 ) 1 8 ( )
7 12189 07 )
1 1 6
) 1 ( ) 5384 0 1
7 9 ) ( ( B
1 7 4681 1
1 B
G
1
1 1 G
1 ( 4 1
( ) ( 7 ) 1 1 ( (
) ) 8 ) GB 3 1 7 1 0) 1 1 1 11 6)
( 1 9312 ( ) (
( 10 12201 ) ( )
9309 2
0 9)
1 1 (10 6
( 1 ) 1 5 1 1 0
( ) )
E 1
( 5
(
5 0
8) 1 10 0 ( ( 1
(107) (
)
6
N 1
1
( 3) 5)
(11 (10
9311)
5
1
) 1
)
9 ( 1 1
A ( ) 6 ( 1 0
0 )
2 06
1 (1 ) ) 8
( 1 1 ) ( 2
(11 1 0
9319 1
L (
( 1 0 4 )
)
4 12186 1
1
( ( 1 0 3
) )
T (111
)
3 G 1 1
( 9313 9317
B )
)
) 9320 2
0 4 5476
1 0 ) 0 1 1
( (
7 09) 1 1 (1 ( 1 ( 2 ) N 1 1
GB ( 2 1 0 ( )
( 1 0
1
A ) )
) (111) (108
1 0 0 ) ( 6 )
1 ) (109)
1 5 0
)
( 1 0
1
R 1 12190 1
( 0
) (
9310 5 1 0 ( G (1 12187 9314 9315 9316 5481 ) 18 E ) 1 4 ) ( 1 1 4
( 0 ) 1 9
N ( ) ) 9
9 7 ( 1 ) 0 1 1 )( 8 ( 9 0 1 1
1 ) ( 5472 5477
(
2 )
) 9 9 12188 1 ( ) 6 1 0 0 ) ( 1 1 (99 5418 1 ( ) ( 2 0 ) 1 1 5429 ( 1 5419 5424 ) 1 5471 3 1 ( (1 (104) ) 5475 1 12 ) ( 5420 5425 54318 100) 0 ( ) 1 ) 0 5392 9) ( TV 103 2 ) 5417 10 ( 1 PROPOSED POPULATION HEALTH 6 ( ( (11 ) 5) (99 ) 5426 ) 0 9 5415 5421 5433 1 1 6 ( 1 5416 ) 0 ( 07 1 (1 ( FOOTPRINT ) 8 1 1 G ( B ) 5445 1 0 ) 1
5) 0 (
1 )
1 )
1 6 5485
0
( 1 ) 1 0 (
5 )
5414 ( 0 5486 8 1 0
( 5473 5474 (9 1
(
)
2 0
1 (
)
PHYSICS/ASTRONOMY
9
7 6 ) ( 9
5394 5413 (
) 14 (1
5412 )
5411 7
)
) 9
) 7 7 8 (
) 7 (
9 0 5470 9 0 ( 1 ) 5408 ) (1 ( 5483 8
7
0
0
5423 5434 1 5410 1
)
1 5428 1 1 ( ( (
( 7 8
5405 5422 5427 5432 5484 ) )
) GUTHRIE ANNEX 02 5409 9
)
13 0 7
1 0
( ) 1
10 1
1 ( ( ( 5404 5430 (79) 112) 5407 (DEMO) (
B
)
G 9
0
1 5395 (
5406 GUTHRIE ANNEX 01
)
5403 8
0
54431 (109) ( ) 5446 5469 ) (108 (111 ) (DEMO) 2) (8 3 5402 0 1
GUTHRIE ANNEX 03 5449 (
) (83) 8
0
1 ( 02) ) 5460 (1
(110 (DEMO) 5459
9 9 8 7 ) ) ( ( 9 9 8 7 ) ) ( 5438 (
108) 4) 0 ) 1 (
5440 5441 ( 5454 5458 1 5468 (8
10) 5436 1 ) 0 1 7 ( 07) ( 5464
(1 0)
5400 10 ) 6 0 1 5435 ( 5452 (
99) ) 0 5 ( 1 (
8)
) 0 4
(
5401 1 (9
) 3 0 1 ( ) 5487 (97 6) (106) (9 ) 5447 (95 ) 2) 2
10 )
( 8 )
4) 5 (
(94()9 4
8 S02°06'58"W 2843.83' (R) 8 (
(93) (
5448 5465 ) 9 8 (
) 5 0 EXISTING RETAINING 1 ( 5439 5467 5450 5455 5457 5462 5466 5437 5451 WALL TO BE REMOVED 12184 12185 5461 5463 ) 5456 8 0 1 ( 5442
) ) )
2 1 3 8 8 ( 8
( ( ) ) 5 4 0 0 1 ) ) ) 1 ( 3 ) 1 0 ( 9 ) 0 6 9 ) ) ( ( ) 5 1 9 7 8 ( ( 2 9 ( 9 8 8 WEST ( ( ( ) 15TH AVE NE 7 ) 0 ) ) 0 1 ) 1 ) ) ) ) 4 8 ( 0 9 7 4 8 ( 2 1 0 9 ( 0 ( 0 9 9 ) ( 1 1 ( ( 5 ) ( ( 9 8 ( 8 (
) 6 6) 0 ) 8 1 8 ( ( 9 ) ( 3 9 ( N
185 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBERAUGUST 23, 2017 25, 2017 SITE DESIGN
TREE PROTECTION MEASURES Four existing trees (including 2 exceptional trees) are to be protected as part of the Population Health Facility development. Tree protection measures will follow City of Seattle requirements, including:
• Installation of tree protection fencing at limit of Critical Root Zone prior to start of construction activities. Additional protective measures to include a thick layer of mulch over the critical root zone. • Limiting work and method of work within tree protection fencing per City of Seattle requirements. • Arborist review of tree protection measures, canopy and root pruning as required. • Immediate soil cover, watering and protection of exposed roots.
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS || MILLERMILLER HULLHULL || UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 196
) 9307
9
1 1 SITE DESIGN ( ) 7 0 1 4680 ( ) 9
B 10
G ) (
0
1 1 (
)
7 0
1 GUTHRIE ANNEX 04 (
)
9 1
1
( )
8 ( ) 1 9
0 0
1
( ) 1 8
(DEMO) ( 0
( ) 1 7 0
) (118) 4679
8 )
1 19 4682
1 ) 1 ( 1 1 ) ( 8 ) ( 7
7 12189 0 ) 6
1 (1 0 )
) 5384 1 1
(
) ( 9
7 B 4681
7
B
1
1 1 G
G
1 1
( 1 1
1 4 ( ) 1 1 ( 7 ( ( )
) ) 8 ) GB 3 1 7 1 0) 1 1 1 11 6)
9312 ( ) (
( 1 10 12201
( ) ( )
9309 2
0 09) 6
1 1 (1
0
) ( ) 1 1
5 1 )
1
1 ( 5
( 0
E 5 ( 1 08) 0 ( (1 1
(107) (
)
6
N 1 1
( 3) 5)
(11 (10
9311)
5
1
1 )
) ( ) 1 0 6 9 ( 1
1 A (
0 6)
2 (10 )
1
) 1
) 2 8 ( 1 1 1 ( 1
( 0
9319 1
(
4 ) 1 0
L (
)
4 12186 1 1
( 3 ) 1 0 ( )
T (111 )
3
1 1 9313 )
G ( 9317
)
B 9320 2
) 4 5476
0 0 0
1 1 (
) (1 ) 1
7 (109 (
1 ( 2 1 1
N (1 )
( 2 1 0 )
1 ) 0 1
A 8) ( ) (111) (10 0 1 0 )
(
6 )
1 ) (109) 0
)
1 5 0
1
( 1 12190 1
1 (
R ( ) 0
5 1 9310 ( 10 G ( 12187 9314 9315 9316 5481 ) 8 E ) 1 ) 1 4
1 4 ( ) 1 0
( 1 9
N ( 9 ) ( 7 ) 0 8 1 0 (
1 5472 5477 ( )
) ) 9 9 2 ( 6 12188 1 ) 0 1 9) 0 1 (9 ( 1 ) 5418 1 ( 2 ( 0 ) (1 1 5429 1 5419 5424 5471 ) 3 1 1 ( (104) (1 5475 ) ) 5420 5425 54318 (100 0 ) ) (1 TV 103 5392 09 ( PROPOSED POPULATION HEALTH ) 5417 1 116 ( 99) ( 5) ( 5426 ) 0 5433 1 5415 5421 ( 5416 ) 06 7 1 0 ( (1 FOOTPRINT
G B ) 5445 1 0 1
) ) (
5 0 )
) 5485
1 1 6 0
0 1 ) )
1 ( 5486
( 1 5 8 0
( 0
5414 1 9
( 5473 5474 ( 1
(
) 2
0
1 ( )
PHYSICS/ASTRONOMY
9 7 6 ) ( 9 5394 5413 (
) 14 (1 )
5412 7 )
5411 )
9
) 7 7
(
8 7 (
) 9 0 5470 ( 9 )
0 ) 5408 1 1 5483 ( ( 8
7
0
0
5434 1
5410 5423 1
) 5428 1 ( 1 ( 1 (
( 7 8
5405 5422 5427 5432 5484 ) )
) GUTHRIE ANNEX 02
5409 9 7
) 0
13 0 1
(1 0) 1 ( 1 ( 5404 (1 5430 (79) 2) 5407 (DEMO) (11
B
)
G 9
0
1 5395 (
5406 GUTHRIE ANNEX 01
)
5403 8 0
54431 (109) ( ) 5446 5469 (108 1) ) (DEMO) 2) 1 (8 (1 3
0 5402 1 GUTHRIE ANNEX 03 5449 (
(83) )
8
0
1 ) ( 5460 (102
(110) (DEMO) 5459 ) ) ) 8 7 7 9 9 9 ( ( ) ( 8 9 5438 (
8) 84) 1 0 1 )
5436 5440 5441 (10 5454 5458 ( 5468 ( ) 0 7 1 ( 5464
(107) 0)
10
) ( 0 6 1 5400 ( 5452
5435 )
(99 ) 5 0 (
1 8)
)
4 0 9 (
5401 1 (
) 3 0 1 ( ) 5487 (97 (96)
(106) 5447 (95) )
) 2 2 ) 8
(10 ) ) 5 ( 94()94 4 ( 8
S02°06'58"W 2843.83' (R) 8 (
5465 (93) (
)
5448 9 8 (
) 5 0 EXISTING RETAINING 1 5467 ( 5439 5450 5455 5457 5462 5466 5437 5451 WALL TO BE REMOVED 12184 12185 5456 5461 5463 5442 LIMIT OF WORK
) ) )
2 1 3 8 8 ( 8 ( (
) ) 5 4 0 0 ) ) 1 ) 1 (1 3 ) 9 90) ) ( 0 6 ( ( 5 ) ) 7 8 1 9 2 9 ( ( ( 9 8 8 15TH AVE NE( ( ( ) ) 1 ) ) ) ) ) 4 (84 2 0 0 9 7 9 0 1 0 9 9 ) ( ( 1 ( ( 5 ) 1 ( 9 8 ( ( 8 (
6) ) (8 8 9 ( (93)
EXISTING TREE LEGEND 0 20' 40'
EXISTING TREE UNDER CONSIDERATION EXCEPTIONAL TREE FOR PRESERVATION
EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE IN POOR CONDITION
LIMIT OF WORK PROPERTY LINE
207 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBERAUGUST 23, 2017 25, 2017 SITE DESIGN
)
0
1
)
1
) 5 ( 3 2
3 1 1 B ( (
G
2)
13 )
( 8
1
)
)
1
3
(
3 1
1 2
( 1
)
(
1
1
)
1
( 2
) 1
) 1 1
)
)
( 8
) ) ) ) ) 2
6 )
) 9 9)
2 ) 7 6 4 1 4
2 2
1 5
2 5 1 1 ( 0 1 2 2
1 2 1 W STEVENS) WAY1 NE
( 1 1 1
2 2 1 ( 1
1 ( 7 ( 1 ( ( 1
( 1 ( ( ( 1 ( ( 1 (
GLIMITB OF WORK
)
1
3
1
(
)
0
3
) 1
( 4 1
1 ( G
B
) )
7 1 3)
2 1 )
1 2 5 1
1 ( ) ( 1 ) 1 ) ) 0 ( 6 5 4 ( 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 ( ( ( ( ) ) 9 8
2 2
1 1 )
( (
) 2 ) 5539
3 3
12 1 ( 2 1
(
( ) 1 2
1 2 9288
( )
6
1 1 (
)
( 2 1 ) 9 4
1
1
( ) ) 2 1 1 (1 3
1
(
) 9289
) 2 1 3
( 0
) 1 1 1
2 (
5372 ) 1
(
8
) 8 2 1 1
) ( 0 1
3 ) (
1 22 )
( (1 9 ) 2 1 7
5376 ( ) 1
1 ) 0
) ( 2 1 2 ( 1 5
1 1
(
1
( 1 ) 2 1 (
( 0 1 2 )
) 2 7 1
( 9290
( 2 1 ) 7
)
4
2 )
1 3 ) ( 126 2 ( 1 )
( )
) 9 ) 6 1 2 ( 53772 ) 7 0 2 1 7 5) 1 2 1 2 (1 1 ( (1 5379 ( (
) 6) 92916 1 (1
(12 )
21 ) 5 2 1 ( 1 (
)
5 )
) 5 2 1 1 1 5378 ( 5380 8 ( )
1
0
1
2
(
)
4 1
2 1 9292 ( (
)
ARCHITECTURE HALL 8 GUTHRIE HALL
0
) 1 24 ) ( (1 7 1
B 1
( ) G 4 ) (11 6
1
1
(
0) )
) 2
3 1
2 ( 5 1 5381( 1
1
(
)
2
2 )
1 13 ( ) 1 GB ( 4
1
1 (
)
112
) (
1
2
1 ( 8)
1 B
1 ASOTIN PLACE NE ( ) G 3
1
1
(
)
0 )
2 11
1 9306 1 ( (
0 ) ( 2 1 ) ) 8 2 0 1
1
1 ( ) 7 ( 1
5382 1 (
)
0
)
)
)
9307 0
2 1
) 1 (
9 8 1
1 1
1 1 1
( ( 9293
1 1 (
(
) 7 0 1 4680 ( ) 9
B 10
G ) (
0
1 1 (
)
7 0 1 GUTHRIE ANNEX 04 ( (DEMO) 0 20' 40' EXISTING TREE LEGEND
EXISTING TREE UNDER CONSIDERATION EXCEPTIONAL TREE FOR PRESERVATION
EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE IN POOR CONDITION
LIMIT OF WORK PROPERTY LINE
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS || MILLERMILLER HULLHULL || UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 218 SITE DESIGN
EXISTING TREE NARRATIVE 12189 121 Trees are proposed to be removed in order to construct the Population Health Facility, associated open spaces and circulation routes. Following is a summary of proposed mitigation measures and the reasons for 9317 removal of trees. 9319 12190 5472 Proposed Mitigation - Tree Preservation, Replacement, Transplant and Salvage Tree Preservation - 4 trees, including 2 exceptional trees are to be preserved based on their size, condition, location and current elevation.
Tree Replacement – 121 new trees (1:1 ratio of trees to be removed) will be planted at the UW campus as part of the Population Health construction. Approximately 77 trees are to be installed within the project limit of works. Existing C8 parking lot and Guthrie Annex 02 to be demolished. Tree #12189, an exceptional Water Oak, is to The remaining approximately 44 trees are to be installed at various locations on Campus where best needed in be preserved. coordination with the Campus Landscape Architect and Campus Arborist.
Transplant - The team is also exploring the potential for transplanting specimen species to a new location on 5486 campus. All trees to be preserved will be protected based on the details and measures outlined by the city of Seattle. Additional tree protection information will be provided in the construction document set. 5483 5485 Salvage - Trees with wood of value for re-use are to be salvaged and given to University Facilities as part of 12201 their existing tree salvage program.
Reasons for Tree Removal
Existing Structure Demolition – As part of construction, the existing Guthrie Annexes 1-4 and the existing retaining wall along 15th Ave NE are to be removed. A large percentage of the existing trees are at the top of the 15th Ave retaining wall or in immediate proximity to the Guthrie Annexes and will need to be removed as Guthrie Annex 01 on the right hand side to be demolished. part of site demolition.
New Building Footprint & Construction – The proposed building is to be developed to the footprint allowed in 4681 the current Campus Master Plan. The majority of trees to be removed fall within or immediately adjacent to this footprint and are required to be removed in order to construct the building. 9293 4679 4680 Site Open Space, Grading & Accessibility Improvements – Following the existing tree plans are a series of plans highlighting proposed accessibility, pedestrian, bicycle, vehicular and open space improvements. Due to the challenges of the existing topography and project goal to increase ADA accessibility, improve circulation and public open spaces, tree protection opportunities are limited.
Asotin Place NE to be re-built and regraded to provide an ADA accessible, pedestrian oriented route.
229 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBERAUGUST 23, 2017 25, 2017 SITE DESIGN
5381
12190 5384 12187 5473 5471 5472 5382 5474
Existing trees to be removed as part of building construction, C8 parking lot demolition, pedestrian and Existing trees along Grant Lane to be demolished as part of pedestrian Guthrie Annex 04 to be demolished. Existing Tree #5381, an exceptional accessibility improvements. circulation and accessibility improvements. Ponderosa Pine, to be preserved.
9288 5434 - 5416 9307 5539 9306
Asotin Place to be rebuilt and regraded to provide a pedestrian oriented accessible route. Guthrie Annex 04 and associated existing trees and pathway to be C8 parking lot, existing trees and Guthrie Annex 03 to be demolished for demolished to provide improved pedestrian routes along Grant Lane NE. building construction.
5445 12189 9311 9314 9317 5457 9310 9316 5456 5463 5467 5471 5455 5415 - 5402 9315 5442 5461 5435 5450
Existing C8 parking lot to be demolished for building construction and to create a pedestrian oriented, ADA Existing trees at the top of the 15th Ave NE retaining wall to be Guthrie Annex 03 and associated trees to be demolished. accessible route. Existing tree #12189, an exceptional Water Oak to be preserved, is visible in the background. demolished to provide streetscape improvements.
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS || MILLERMILLER HULLHULL || UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 2310 SITE DESIGN
Proposed Trees & Public Open Space
PROPOSED TREES (77)
EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN Note: includes existing trees outside of project limit of work for context.
PROPOSED BIO-RETENTION AREAS
Landscape improvements associated with the new Population Health Facility will replace lost tree canopy by planting (approx. 77) new trees on site and an additional (approx. 44) trees at other locations on Campus to meet the UW’s 1:1 tree replacement policy. Tree and plant species are to be selected to work with site micro-climates, to improve the character and experience of pathways and open spaces and for long-term health and drought tolerance.
GARDEN GRANT WALK SOUTH LANE COURT
15th AVE
N Proposed Tree species to be planted. Top Left: Kentucy Coffee Tree; Top Right: Pacific Dogwood; Bottom Left: Evergreen Magnolia; Bottom Right: Mountain Hemlock.
2414 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBERAUGUST 23, 2017 25, 2017 SITE DESIGN
Grant Lane The Grant Lane Garden Walk The garden walk corridor will have a mix of large canopy will have a lush variety of native and NW trees and small/medium deciduous adpated tree species to create a wellness trees with a low and open understory to experience between Architecture Hall allow for open views along a highly used and the Population Health facility pedestrian and bicycle route. and along Asotin Place with a dense understory of perennials, shrubs and grouncovers.
Grant Lane Existing Photos Grant Lane Proposed Tree Species: Garden Walk Existing Photos Garden Walk Tree Species: Calocedrus Gymnocladus dioicus ‘Espresso’, decurrens, Cornus x Galaxy Amelanchier alnifolia FFE 140.5 15th Avenue The east side of South Court Most of the existing the 15th Avenue corridor currently does South Court currently does not have FFE 127.5 not have street trees within the right-of- existing trees as it is over the existing way. The project proposes a new 8’ width Physics/Astronomy and Guthrie Hall
planting strip and 8’ sidewalk requiring loading dock. New tree plantings will be removal of the existing retaining wall and located at the perimeter of this area and trees on top of this wall. New street trees along the new public staircase entry to FFE 101.5 will be planted at regular spacing (25’ to the Campus from 15th Avenue NE.
N N 30’ apart.
15th Ave Existing Photos 15th Ave Proposed Street Tree Species: South Court Existing Photos 15th Ave Staircase Entry Tree Species: Liriodendron tulipifera ‘Emerald City’ Magnolia virginiana
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS || MILLERMILLER HULLHULL || UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 252 SITESITE DESIGN DESIGN
Proposed Pedestrian & ADA Circulation PEDESTRIAN ROUTE
ADA ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
POTENTIAL FUTURE MID-BLOCK CROSSING The Population Health project will increase accessibility, increase connectivity and improve the pedestrian experience. The major pedestrian and ADA improvements are as follows:
15th Ave Streetscape – The existing sidewalk is 6’ width with no street trees or buffer from the street. Proposed streetscape improvements will add a 2’ width concrete courtesy strip for maintenance use, 8’ planting strip with street trees and an 8’ sidewalk. The building will have an additional landscape setback of 6’ to 12’ from the back of sidewalk to improve the pedestrian experience along this heavily trafficked route.
Grant Lane Walkway – The existing sidewalk along Grant Lane is 3’ to 8’ width with no buffer from the street. Proposed walkway improvements will provide a 12’ width walkway buffered from the street with landscape and trees. An ADA accessible route will be created from 15th Ave to Stevens Way utilizing this walk and diverging where switchbacks are required to meet ADA grades.
Asotin Place - Asotin Place is currently a driveway with a separated pedestrian pathway. Proposed improvements will regrade this lane to meet accessibility and prioritize it for pedestrian use with secondary use for service, fire lane and ADA parking.
FFE 140.5 Property Line 11’- 6” FFE 127.5
Proposed Street Tree
Proposed Planting Strip FFE 101.5 N
PORCH STAIR PATH PLANTING 15TH AVE 8’ - 0” 8’ - 0” 7’ - 0” Section of building and streetscape at 15th Ave NE.
1126 POPULATIONPOPULATION HEALTH HEALTH FACILITY FACILITY SDCI#3028469SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINEDSTREAMLINED DESIGN DESIGN REVIEW REVIEW AUGUSTSEPTEMBER 23, 2017 25, 2017 SITE DESIGN
Proposed Bicycle Circulation & Parking
BIKE ROUTE
BIKE PARKING FACILITIES (EXISTING & PROPOSED)
POTENTIAL FUTURE MID-BLOCK CROSSING
The Population Health project will increase bicycle parking and improve bicycle circulation as follows:
Short-term Bicycle Parking - A minimum of 33 short-term bicycle parking spaces are to be provided exterior to the building at building entries. High visibility safe locations under building canopy are prioritized.
Long-term Bicycle Parking - Approximately 200 long-term bicycle parking spaces are to be provided interior to the building for building users in a secured bicycle storage room with access from 15th Ave NE at the SE corner of the building.
Grant Lane improvements - The project is studying improvements to bicycle circulation from 40th Ave NE to Stevens Way NE in coordination with UW Transportation Services and Metro. It is yet to be determined what improvements are possible within the roadway. N
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS || MILLERMILLER HULLHULL || UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 2712 SITE DESIGN
Proposed Vehicle Access & Circulation VEHICLE ACCESS ROUTES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ACCESS N N EXISTING BUS STOP LOCATION
N N PROPOSED BUS STOP RELOCATION
FIRE LANE - 150’ 60’ - 0” 60’ 150’ - 0” 150’
N N
PROPOSED PARKING STALLS 60’ - 0” 60’ N - 0” 150’ N
N N N N The University of Washington manages parking needs on a campus wide basis. The Population Health Facility will provide 2-5 parking stalls along Asotin Lane. The priority for N N N those parking stalls is ADA first and service vehicle parking second. The final allocation and number of parking stalls will be determined by UW Transportation Services to meet campus N needs. The existing loading dock at Architecture Hall will remain in its existing footprint with vehicular access provided N from Asotin Lane. The existing Physics/Astronomy & Guthrie Hall loading dock will be modified to add (2) new loading dock bays for the N Population Health facility. No additional parking is proposed at this loading dock.
The existing N pair of bus stops on Grant Lane NE may need to be relocated during construction to a location on Stevens Way adjacent to Guthrie Hall. The project team is working with UW Transportation Services and Metro to coordinate interim and final bus stop facilities. N
2813 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBERAUGUST 23, 2017 25, 2017 5. DESIGN GUIDELINES DESIGN GUIDELINES
The Population Health Facility Site is located on the western edge of The University of Washington Central Campus. In order to contribute to a campus environment that supports and facilitates the mission of “the University as a public institution dedicated to learning, teaching, research, and community service” (UW Campus Master Plan 2003 p8), the design of the building will follow the design guidelines in the Campus Master Plan, while also acknowledging the guidelines set forth in the Seattle Design Guidelines.
2003 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN (CMP) SEATTLE 2003 Building Design (CMP pp. 21-23)
“ Maintain continuity with the context of surrounding buildings, or if the “ Building design and placement should accommodate existing context is not clear or valued, contribute to the establishment convenient pedestrian circulation.” - 2003 CMP of a new context.” - 2003 CMP “Complement and contribute to the network of open spaces “ Strengthen the most desirable forms, characteristics and patterns of around the site and the connections among them.” - Seattle the streets, block faces, and open spaces in the surrounding area” Design Guidelines PL1 - Seattle Design Guidelines CS2
RESPONSE: RESPONSE: The Population Health Facility will anchor and provide an important gateway The development of this site affords the opportunity to improve into Central Campus and link to West Campus. The project will provide a campus and neighborhood connectivity through improved facilities network of open spaces that allow for a rich, landscaped entry into campus for pedestrians, cyclists and transit users. This project will improve as well as accessible routes throughout the site. The building’s design speaks circulation in an area of the campus that is not currently fully both to the urban scale and modern context of West campus while providing accessible, will promote cycling through improved routes, bicycle a quiet and respectful backdrop to the historic context of Architecture Hall and parking and facilities, and will create an inviting green entry for Central Campus to the East. pedestrians, cyclists and transit users. Pedestrian circulation and open spaces will maximize accessibility and provide inviting and New open spaces integrated at the building entries will provide inviting safe ways to circulate both during the day and night. campus open space for social events, quiet study, and active collaboration. These courts and walks allow for planned and unplanned meet ups and opportunities to engage with neighboring populations. Glazing at the ground level and at key areas on upper levels will provide views into the interactive spaces inside and showcase the work of the Population Health Initiative. Through right-sizing, integration of a variety of seating and indoor/outdoor connections, the project aims to maximize opportunities for human and campus connectivity.
30 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 DESIGN GUIDELINES
“ Express entrances, places of gathering, transition from outside to “ Express function in the design concept of the building through form inside, and protection from weather.” - 2003 CMP and organization.” - 2003 CMP “ Create a safe and comfortable walking environment that is easy to “Develop an architectural concept that will result in a unified and navigate and well-connected to existing pedestrian walkways and functional design that fits well on the site and within its surroundings.” features.” - Seattle Design Guidelines PL2 - Seattle Design Guidelines DC2
RESPONSE: RESPONSE: Key to a healthy experience are places that are equitable, inviting, and safe. Connectivity - both internal and external- is the guiding concept for the Ground level uses are transparent and are encouraged to spill out to exterior Population Health Facility. Design for the UW Population Health facility open spaces. The ground plane program of the building allows for active, considers Connectivity through three lenses – Campus, Environmental and public engagement and transparency along 15th Avenue and NE Grant Lane. Human - in a layered approach that gives consideration to both the scale of Public access will be welcoming, but balanced with features, lighting, and the individual and the scale of the globe. signage that protect building user’s personal safety. The building design will have a long life/loose fit approach, with a structural The main entrances to the building will announce themselves through cues system that allows for programmatic flexibility and adaptability. The project in building form, ground level setbacks, landscape and materiality. Weather will consider Life Cycle Cost Analysis when choosing important building protection will be provided at all 5 building entrances, as well as along systems and cladding options in order to provide a long-lasting and durable portions of 15th Avenue. building for the programs to evolve over time. Pedestrian circulation and open spaces will maximize accessibility and Clean simple forms will create a visual identity for the building that is distinct, provide inviting and safe ways to circulate both during the day and night. while respecting the historic structures in its context. Color and material Garden walks and usable open spaces will provide restorative opportunities choices will be made carefully, to be timeless in quality and to respect local by allowing for access to nature, meditative experiences, exercise and social cultures and materials. Material selections will be authentic, humble and interaction. reclaimed when possible. Detailing will embrace craft, durability, and create appropriate scale at areas of human interaction.
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 31 DESIGN GUIDELINES
“ Design solutions responsive to context, climate, and energy conservation are encouraged unless the project is an addition to a historically designated building and deviation from the original is not suitable. Contextual responses can be accomplished through siting, choice of materials, form, scale, massing, and aesthetic references.” - 2003 CMP “Use natural systems and features of the site and its surroundings as a starting point for project design” - Seattle Design Guidelines CS1
RESPONSE: In keeping with the established goals for the project, Population Health facility will implement sustainable energy, water, and stormwater solutions. The project will preserve exceptional trees, replace trees removed at a 1:1 rate, and salvage trees with re-use potential. New plantings will be selected for their adaptability, drought tolerance and native qualities, enhancing pathways and open spaces to provide a garden like experience. Sustainability goals for the Population Health Facility site are targeting holistic solutions to minimize potable water use, decrease stormwater run- off, decrease heat island effects and enhance the urban forest. With an integrated approach to the design of irrigation, stormwater facilities, planting, roofs and hardscape, the project is on a path to furthering the goals of the UW Urban Forestry Master Plan, the UW Climate Action Plan and the UW Campus Master Plan. The project team is assessing the available rainwater, greywater, and solar energy to use in the building’s operation. Coupled with efficient water and energy systems, and a high performance facade, the project is targeting exceptional sustainability achievements, furthering the goals of the UW Climate Action Plan.
32 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 6. ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
The building will be developed according to the 2003 Campus Master Plan, the project is anticipated to be close to the Campus Master Plan 105’ building height limit, including a 15’ mechanical penthouse over the height limit. The estimated size of the facility is 300,000 GSF, with 8-stories of above-grade space, and 2 partial levels of below-grade space.
PROPOSED BUILDING ENTRY AT EXISTING RETAINING WALL PROPOSED RE-GRADING OF SITE ALLOWS NORTHWEST CORNER OF 15TH ALONG 15TH AVENUE. FOR BUILDING’S BASE TO MEET SIDEWALK AVENUE AND NE GRANT LANE. AND PROVIDE ACTIVE PROGRAM AND TRANSPARENCY ALONG 15TH AVE.
WEST OF 15TH AVE NE STREET ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION ALONG 15TH AVENUE ZONING HEIGHT LIMIT BUILDING OUTLINE
34 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
CONCEPT FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL B2
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 35 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
CONCEPT FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL B1
36 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
CONCEPT FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 37 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
CONCEPT FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2
38 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
CONCEPT FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 39 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
CONCEPT FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 4 - 7, TYPICAL
40 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
CONCEPT FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 8
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 41 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
1
N
1. VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST ACROSS 15TH AVE NE
42 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
2 N
2. VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST ACROSS 15TH AVE NE
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 43 [ PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ] 7. APPENDIX
PG.130 • Maximum hieight for zone H5 is 105 feet (Table V-2). Structure height and exceptions shall be STRUCTURE HEIGHT per the 2003 CMP. • Measured from finished or existing grade, whichever is lower, up to a plane parallel to the existing or finished grade. APPENDIX • On sloped sites, when more than 50% of the roof area is below the height limit, the remainder of that floor may be built above the height limit, not to exceed 15 feet. Land Use Summary: LAND USE SUMMARY LAND USE SUMMARY• Central Utility stack, communication aerials, flagpoles, light poles, and exhaust ducts are exempt from height limits. SiteThe (22C/C19) Population is zoned Health MIO-105-MR. Facility It is(PHF) located site within 22C/C19 boundaries isdesignated zoned byMIO-105-MR. a Major It is located within Site (22C/C19) is zoned MIO-105-MR. It is located within boundaries designated by a Major Institutionalboundaries overlay designated (MIO) zone bywith a a Majorheight limi Institutionalt of 105 feet as overlay defined in (MIO) the City zone of Seattle with lan ad height limit of 105 Institutional overlay (MIO) zone• Stair with and a height elevator limi penthouses,t of 105 feet aschimneys, defined mechin the equCityipment, of Seattle telecomm land Usefeet and as Zoning defined Code. in the City of Seattle land Use and Zoning Code. Use and Zoning Code. utilities, greenhouses, and open mesh fencing may extend up to 15 feet above max height limit if combined rooftop coverage does not exceed 25%
• Screening may exceed height and coverage limits to insure views and UW 2003 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN (CMP) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PHF CONSISTENCY UW 2003 CAMPUSvistas MASTER are not adversely PLAN impacted.(CMP) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PHF CONSISTENCY
PG.135 • Development within the MIO is governed by this Campus Master Plan, Development Standards are governed by the PG.130PG.135 • UWDevelopment Campus Masterwithin the Plan MIO does is governednot address by Floorthis Ca Areampus Ratio. Master Plan, NoDevelopment FAR limits Standardsapply. are governed by the DEVELOPMENT not the underlying zoning or 2003 CMP. No portions of the Seattle Land Use DENSITY:DEVELOPMENT GSF not the underlying zoning or 2003 CMP. No portions of the Seattle Land Use REVIEW land use code. If a development standard of the underlying zone is not Code for the underlying zone shall apply. REVIEW land use code. If a development standard of the underlying zone is not Code for the underlying zone shall apply. discussed in this chapter, it does not apply. PG.130 discussed• Setbacks in are this required chapter, only it does for newnot apply.structures at the boundary of the There are no required setbacks for this project SETBACKS campus and along City of Seattle streets or alleys, when property across from per the 2003 CMP. • The lack of specificity in the Campus Master Plan shall not result in •the The structure lack of specificityis not owned in theby theCampus University. Master Plan shall not result in application of provisions of the underlying zoning or other provisions in application of provisions of the underlying zoning or other provisions in the City’s land use code. the• University City’s land structures use code. across a City street or alley from commercial, manufacturing, or industrial zones will have no required setbacks. • State and federally mandated regulations such as critical areas and/or • State and federally mandated regulations such as critical areas and/or endangered species are acknowledged and will be followed. endangered• Pedestrian speciesbridges, areretaining acknowledged walls, raised and plazawill bes, folsculpturelowed. and other site elements shall have no setback reqt’s in any zone. PG.135 • Academic, open space, transportation, housing, mixed-use, and all other Proposed uses include office spaces, lecture PG.135 • Academic, open space, transportation, housing, mixed-use, and all other Proposed uses include office spaces, lecture USES uses that are determined by the University to be necessary to fulfill the room, light food service, exibition space, bike USES uses• Underground that are determined structures, by pedestrian the University bridges to be and ne wcessaryalkways to are fulfill permitted the room, light food service, exibition space, bike mission of the University of Washington are allowed. (Table IV-4, on page 86 storage, locker room, which are all allowed in missionwithin setbacks. of the University of Washington are allowed. (Table IV-4, on page 86 storage, locker room, which are all allowed in of the Campus Master Plan) the 2003 CMP. of the Campus Master Plan) the 2003 CMP. PG.129 • Open space is planned on a campus-wide basis, not a building specific Landscape will be per 2003 CMP. LANDSCAPE AND basis. Proposed and enhanced open spaces are shown in Figure IV-18. Green Factor is not a requirement. PG.128 • Demolitions are permitted as long as sites are left in a safe conditionand Demolition of four structures will occur prior to PG.128OPEN SPACE Open• Demolitions space ranges are permitted from passive as long to asactive. sites are left in a safe conditionand Demolition of four structures will occur prior to DEMOLITIONS free of debris. Demolition may be permitted prior to futuredevelopment. construction of the Population Health Facility DEMOLITIONS free of debris. Demolition may be permitted prior to futuredevelopment. construction of the Population Health Facility per the 2003 CMP. • The Campus Landscape Advisory Committee will review landscape plans in per the 2003 CMP. PG.128 • A variety of ground floor uses are encouraged, particularly in West Campus. Ground Floor Uses include flexible lecture PG.128 •accordance A variety of with ground the University’sfloor uses are Landscape encouraged, Policies particularly. in West Campus. Ground Floor Uses include flexible lecture GROUND FLOOR USES Offices, commercial, academic, housing, mixed use, and parking are room, classroom, café, exibition space, which GROUNDPG.130 FLOOR USES Offices,• University commercial, facilities willacademic, be designed housing, to meet mixed th euse, provisions and parking of applicable are room,Noise controlclassroom, measures café, exibition will conform space, to 2003which acceptable. are allowed in the 2003 CMP. NOISE acceptable.noise control regulations. areCMP. allowed in the 2003 CMP.
PG.130 • Modulation is not required, however the design of buildings will incorporate Building design and modulation will be PG.130 • ModulationVentilation devicesis not required, and other however sources the of design odors wofill buildings be directed will awayincorporate from BuildingOdor control design measures and modulation will conform will tobe 2003 MODULATION measures that provide for appropriate variety, express carrying functions of addressed with the UW Architectural MODULATIONODORS measuresresidential thatzoned provide property. for appropriate variety, express carrying functions of addressedCMP. Site 29with does the notUW abut Architectural a residential zone. the building and respect the pedestrian scale at the ground level. Commission. the building and respect the pedestrian scale at the ground level. Commission.
PG.130 • Maximum hieight for zone H5 is 105 feet (Table V-2). Structure height and exceptions shall be PG.130 • MaximumLighting shall hieight conserve for zone energy H5 is and 105 mitigate feet (Table adver V-se2). impacts of light and StructureThe project height is within and 500exceptions feet of 15thshall Avenue, be STRUCTURE HEIGHT per the 2003 CMP. STRUCTURELIGHT AND GLARE HEIGHT glare on campus buildings, spaces, and adjacent residential areas consistent perwhich the according 2003 CMP. to the 2003 CMP is an arterial. • Measured from finished or existing grade, whichever is lower, up to a plane •with Measured the needs from of safetyfinished and or security.existing grade, whichever is lower, up to a plane The project will comply by providing glare parallel to the existing or finished grade. parallel to the existing or finished grade. diagrams as part of the building permit • Exterior lighting will be shielded or directed away from structures in adjacent submittal package.. • On sloped sites, when more than 50% of the roof area is below the height •or On abutting sloped residential sites, when zones more and than arterials. 50% of the roof area is below the height limit, the remainder of that floor may be built above the height limit, not to limit, the remainder of that floor may be built above the height limit, not to exceed 15 feet. exceed• Glare diagrams15 feet. will be provided when a façade has highly reflective material and the facade will be more than 30 percent comprised of clear or tinted • Central Utility stack, communication aerials, flagpoles, light poles, and •glassis Central that Utility either: stack, 1) orientedcommunication toward andaerials, less fla thgpoles,an 200 feetlight frompoles, a and exhaust ducts are exempt from height limits. exhaustresidential ducts zone, are or exempt 2) oriented from towardheight limits.and less than 500 feet from an arterial.
• Stair and elevator penthouses, chimneys, mech equipment, telecomm PG.131 • SignageStair and intent elevator is to penthouses, minimize its chimneys, aesthetic mechimpac tequ whileipment, serving telecomm the Signage will be per program needs and utilities, greenhouses, and open mesh fencing may extend up to 15 feet SIGNS purposeutilities, greenhouses,of conveying information.and open mesh Sign fencing shall not may co mpeteextend for up attention to 15 feet with consistent with the University standards and above max height limit if combined rooftop coverage does not exceed 25% naturalabove max environment height limit and if combinedbuildings. rooftop coverage does not exceed 25% development regulations. The project is not across the street, alley or abutting a residential • Screening may exceed height and coverage limits to insure views and • Screening may exceed height and coverage limits to insure views and zone. vistas are not adversely impacted. vistas are not adversely impacted. PG.130 • Minimum parking standards only apply for student housing No substantial parking will be included in the PG.130 • UW Campus Master Plan does not address Floor Area Ratio. No FAR limits apply. PARKINGPG.130 • UW Campus Master Plan does not address Floor Area Ratio. Noproject FAR other limits than apply. 2-5 stalls for accessibility and DENSITY: GSF DENSITY: GSF service access. PG.130 • Setbacks are required only for new structures at the boundary of the There are no required setbacks for this project PG.130 • Setbacks are required only for new structures at the boundary of the There are no required setbacks for this project SETBACKS campus and along City of Seattle streets or alleys, when property across from per the 2003 CMP. SETBACKS campus and along City of Seattle streets or alleys, when property across from per the 2003 CMP. the structure is not owned by the University. the structure is not owned by the University. 46 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 • University structures across a City street or alley from commercial, • University structures across a City street or alley from commercial, manufacturing, or industrial zones will have no required setbacks. manufacturing, or industrial zones will have no required setbacks.
• Pedestrian bridges, retaining walls, raised plazas, sculpture and other site • Pedestrian bridges, retaining walls, raised plazas, sculpture and other site APPENDIX
Seattle · Portland · Bend
Project #3028469
This letter is in response to the SDR Draft Packet Comments regarding Project #3028469 issued August 23, 2017. The Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections (SDCI) provided the following comment:
“Trees: Please identify or state if there are any exceptional tree groves per the City definition.”
Tree Solutions Inc. inventoried and assessed the trees on the subject site on November 8th, 2016 and June 20th, 2017. We determined there to be one-hundred and fifty-nine (159) trees within the project area. Of these trees, twenty-three (23) were determined to be exceptional by size based on the criteria in the Director’s Rule 16-2008.
No exceptional tree groves existed on site. The City of Seattle defines an exceptional grove as eight (8) or more trees measuring twelve (12) inches or greater in diameter with a continuously overlapping canopy. There were no continuous areas of trees meeting this criteria within the scope area. The site has many small diameter ornamental trees that do not exceed twelve inches.
Sincerely,
K atie Hog an | Tree S olutions Inc. ISA Certified Arborist PN-8078A ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor w. 206.528.4670 | [email protected] | www.treesolutions.net | 2940 Westlake Ave N #200 Seattle, WA 98109
2940 Westlake Ave N #200 · Seattle, WA 98109 · Phone 206.528.4670 www.treesolutions.net
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 47 APPENDIX
UW Population Health Arborist Report – Expanded Scope Area 12.05.2016 and 07.27.2017 pg. 2 of 5
Observations & Discussion Project No. TS ‐ 5977 The Trees Arborist Report One‐hundred and 59 trees currently exist on Site B; 23 of which qualify as exceptional. Sixteen trees were collected that measured less than six inches at DSH and are therefore not significant by size.
TO: White Shield Inc.; Christopher Plein Trees less than six inches DSH without UW tags were not inventoried. Trees greater than six inches DSH without UW tags were inventoried and a number was designated for the trees starting at 1. SITE: Site B ‐ University of Washington, Seattle Campus RE: Tree Inventory & Assessment for Site Feasibility Study – Expanded Scope Area Several trees that were shown on the maps provided were removed prior to our assessment. These include trees with tag numbers 9296, 9297, 9298, 9303, 9304, 9305, and 12189. DATE: December 5, 2016 and July 27, 2017
PROJECT ARBORISTS: Katie Hogan There were several trees located at the south end of the site that did not have UW tags and were not ISA Certified Arborist PN‐8078A shown on the provided maps at the time of our inventory. The approximate location of these trees are ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor shown on the included site maps, however, exact locations should be determined. We marked these trees with pink flagging for easy identification. These trees were tagged following our assessment by the Haley Galbraith university arborist. ISA Certified Arborist Municipal Specialist PN‐7512AM ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor Once detailed plans are available, we can provide recommendations regarding tree protection and retention.
Summary We were asked to inventory and assess trees located throughout the area of campus designated as Site B. We found that one‐hundred and fifty‐nine (159) trees exist within this area. The majority of trees we found were tagged or formerly tagged with University of Washington (UW) tree tags, for those that were not tagged, we labeled them starting at tree 1. The locations of these trees are shown on the marked‐up site map attached.
Twenty‐three (23) of the trees on site qualify as exceptional per Seattle Director’s Rule 16‐2008. Sixteen (16) of the trees on site measured less than six (6) inches in diameter at standard height (DSH), and are therefore not significant, but were inventoried because they had UW tags and should be tracked for the purpose of keeping the UW tree database up‐to‐date.
Assignment & Scope of Report This report outlines the site inspections by Tree Solutions, Inc. on November 8th and 10th, 2016 and June 20th, 2017. Included are observations and data collected at Site B, located on the University of Washington Seattle campus. Chris Plein, of White Shield Inc. requested these services to acquire information for project planning.
Tree identifier, species, size, condition, and additional notes for each tree can be found in the attached Table of Trees. A marked‐up version of the provided Site Map is also attached. Limits of Assignment, Methods, Condition Ratings, Glossary, and References are outlined below. Additional Assumptions and Limiting Conditions are contained in Appendix A.
2940 Westlake Ave N (Suite 200) ∙ Seattle, WA 98109 ∙ Phone 206.528.4670 2940 Westlake Ave N (Suite 200) ∙ Seattle, WA 98109 ∙ Phone 206.528.4670 www.treesolutions.net www.treesolutions.net
48 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 APPENDIX
UW Population Health Arborist Report – Expanded Scope Area UW Population Health Arborist Report – Expanded Scope Area 12.05.2016 and 07.27.2017 pg. 3 of 5 12.05.2016 and 07.27.2017 pg. 4 of 5
Limits of Assignment Unless stated otherwise: 1) information contained in this report covers only those trees that were Poor ‐ Lacking full crown, more than 50% decline and dieback, especially affecting larger branches. examined and reflects the condition of those trees at the time of inspection; and 2) the inspection is Stunting of shoots is obvious with little evidence of growth on smaller stems. Leaf size and color reveals limited to visual examination of the subject trees without dissection, excavation, probing, climbing, or overall stress in the plant. Insect or disease infestation may be severe and uncontrollable. Extensive decay coring unless explicitly specified. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or hollows in branches and trunk. Short safe useful life expectancy. or deficiencies of the subject trees may not arise in the future. Tree health condition ratings have been adapted from the Purdue University Extension bulletin FNR-473- Tree Solutions did not review any reports or perform any tests related to the soils located on the subject W - Tree Appraisal. property unless outlined in the scope of services. Tree Solutions staff are not and do not claim to be soils experts. An independent inventory and evaluation of the soils on site should be obtained by a qualified Glossary professional if additional understanding of site characteristics is needed to make an informed decision. co‐dominant stems: stems or branches of nearly equal diameter, often weakly attached (Matheny et al. 1998) Methods crown/canopy: the aboveground portions of a tree (Lilly 2001) We evaluated tree health and structure utilizing visual tree assessment (VTA) methods. The basis behind DSH: diameter at standard height; the diameter of the trunk measured 54 inches (4.5 feet) above VTA is the identification of symptoms, which trees produce in reaction to weak spots or areas of grade (Matheny et al. 1998) mechanical stress. Trees react to mechanical and physiological stresses by growing more vigorously to ISA: International Society of Arboriculture re‐enforce weak areas, while depriving less stressed parts (Mattheck & Breloer 1994). Understanding included bark: bark that becomes embedded in a crotch between branch and trunk or between co‐ uniform stress allows us to make informed judgments about the condition of a tree. dominant stems and causes a weak structure (Lilly 2001) significant size: a tree measuring 6 inches DSH or greater We measured the diameter of each tree at 54 inches above grade, the diameter at standard height structural defects: flaws, decay, or other faults in the trunk, branches, or root collar of a tree, which (DSH), unless noted otherwise. Where a tree had multiple stems, we measured each stem individually at may lead to failure (Lilly 2001) standard height and determined a single‐stem equivalent diameter by using the method outlined in the City of Seattle Director’s Rule 16‐2008. A tree is considered Exceptional based on the single‐stem equivalent value. References ANSI A300 (Part 1) – 2008 American National Standards Institute. American National Standard for Tree Condition Ratings Care Operations: Tree, Shrub, and Other Woody Plant Maintenance: Standard Practices (Pruning). Tree health considers crown indicators including foliar density, size, color, stem shoot extensions, decay, New York: Tree Care Industry Association, 2008. and damage. We have adapted our ratings based on the Purdue University Extension Formula Values for health condition. These values are a general representation used to assist in arborists in assigning ratings. Sugimura, D.W. “DPD Director’s Rule 16‐2008”. Seattle, WA, 2009. Tree health needs to be evaluated on an individual basis and may not always fall entirely into a single category, however, a single condition rating must be assigned. Dunster & Associates Environmental Consultants Ltd. Assessing Trees in Urban Areas and the Urban‐ Rural Interface, US Release 1.0. Silverton: Pacific Northwest Chapter ISA, 2006. Excellent ‐ Perfect specimen with excellent form and vigor, well‐balanced crown. Normal to exceeding shoot length on new growth. Leaf size and color normal. Trunk is sound and solid. Root zone undisturbed. Lilly, Sharon. Arborists’ Certification Study Guide. Champaign, IL: The International Society of No apparent pest problems. Long safe useful life expectancy for the species. Arboriculture, 2001.
Good ‐ Imperfect canopy density in few parts of the tree, up to 10% of the canopy. Normal to less than ¾ Matheny, Nelda and James R. Clark. Trees and Development: A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees typical growth rate of shoots and minor deficiency in typical leaf development. Few pest issues or damage, During Land Development. Champaign, IL: International Society of Arboriculture, 1998. and if they exist they are controllable or tree is reacting appropriately. Normal branch and stem development with healthy growth. Safe useful life expectancy typical for the species. Mattheck, Claus and Helge Breloer, The Body Language of Trees.: A Handbook for Failure Analysis. London: HMSO, 1994. Fair ‐ Crown decline and dieback up to 30% of the canopy. Leaf color is somewhat chlorotic/necrotic with smaller leaves and “off” coloration. Shoot extensions indicate some stunting and stressed growing conditions. Stress cone crop clearly visible. Obvious signs of pest problems contributing to lesser condition, control might be possible. Some decay areas found in main stem and branches. Below average safe useful life expectancy
2940 Westlake Ave N (Suite 200) ∙ Seattle, WA 98109 ∙ Phone 206.528.4670 2940 Westlake Ave N (Suite 200) ∙ Seattle, WA 98109 ∙ Phone 206.528.4670 www.treesolutions.net www.treesolutions.net
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 49 APPENDIX
UW Population Health Arborist Report – Expanded Scope Area 12.05.2016 and 07.27.2017 pg. 5 of 5
Appendix A ‐ Assumptions & Limiting Conditions
1. Consultant assumes that any legal description provided to Consultant is correct and that title to property is good and marketable. Consultant assumes no responsibility for legal matters. Consultant assumes all property appraised or evaluated is free and clear, and is under responsible ownership and competent management.
2. Consultant assumes that the property and its use do not violate applicable codes, ordinances, statutes or regulations.
3. Although Consultant has taken care to obtain all information from reliable sources and to verify the data insofar as possible, Consultant does not guarantee and is not responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others.
4. Client may not require Consultant to testify or attend court by reason of any report unless mutually satisfactory contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such Services as described in the Consulting Arborist Agreement.
5. Unless otherwise required by law, possession of this report does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any person other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior express written consent of the Consultant.
6. Unless otherwise required by law, no part of this report shall be conveyed by any person, including the Client, the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media without the Consultant‘s prior express written consent.
7. This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the Consultant, and the Consultant’s fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specific value, a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event or upon any finding to be reported.
8. All photographs included in this report were taken by Tree Solutions Inc. during the documented site visit, unless otherwise noted.
9. Sketches, drawings and photographs in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys. The reproduction of any information generated by architects, engineers or other consultants and any sketches, drawings or photographs is for the express purpose of coordination and ease of reference only. Inclusion of such information on any drawings or other documents does not constitute a representation by Consultant as to the sufficiency or accuracy of the information.
10. Unless otherwise agreed, (1) information contained in this report covers only the items examined and reflects the condition of the those items at the time of inspection; and (2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing, climbing, or coring. Consultant makes no warranty or guarantee, express or implied, that the problems or deficiencies of the plans or property in question may not arise in the future.
11. Loss or alteration of any part of this Agreement invalidates the entire report.
2940 Westlake Ave N (Suite 200) ∙ Seattle, WA 98109 ∙ Phone 206.528.4670 www.treesolutions.net
50 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 APPENDIX
Table of Trees Date of Inventory: 11.08.2017; 11.10.2016; 06.20.2017 UW Population Health Table Prepared: 12.05.2016; 07.27.2017 Site B ‐ Seattle, WA
DSH Multi‐stem Drip Line Health Structural Exceptional Exceptional Site ID Tree ID Scientific Name Common Name (inches) (inches) (feet) Condition Condition Threshold (Y/N) Notes B 5400 Acer platanoides Norway maple 14.6 21 Good Good 30.0 No B 5401 Acer platanoides Norway maple 15.7 18 Good Good 30.0 No B 5395 Acer platanoides Norway maple 12.0 17 Good Fair 30.0 No B 5394 Acer platanoides Norway maple 17.4 17 Good Fair 30.0 No B 5392 Acer platanoides Norway maple 11.4 16 Good Good 30.0 No B 5393 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 4.1 6 Good Good 11.9 No
B 5390 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 5.4 6 Good Good 11.9 No
B 5384 Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf maple 27.2 24 Good Good 30.0 No B 5382 Betula pendula European white birch 9.3 12 Good Good 24.0 No Soil mounded at base
B 5381 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa pine 33.0 23 Good Good 30.0 Yes Pavement displacement B 5380 Pinus aristata Bristlecone pine 4.0 8 Poor Poor 7.6 No B 5379 Pinus aristata Bristlecone pine 5.5 10 Fair Fair 7.6 No B 5378 Pinus aristata Bristlecone pine 3.6 6 Poor Fair 7.6 No B 5377 Pinus contorta var. Shore pine 8.4 10 Fair Fair 12.0 No Pitch flow contorta B 9307 Acer circinatum Vine maple 8.8 6.5, 3.3, 3.7, 12 Good Good 8.0 Yes Tag enveloped 3.2 B 9320 Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar 10.2 7 Good Good 30.0 No
B 9319 Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar 9.5 8 Good Good 30.0 No
B 9317 Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar 14.0 7 Good Good 30.0 No Drip irrigation girdling base
B 9316 Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar 11.5 7 Good Good 30.0 No
B 9315 Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar 13.0 7 Good Good 30.0 No
B 9314 Calocedrus decurrens Incense cedar 12.6 8 Good Good 30.0 No
B 9312 Cornus 'Eddie's White Eddie's White Wonder 4.2 12 Good Good 5.0 No No tag Wonder' dogwood B 9313 Cornus 'Eddie's White Eddie's White Wonder 2.7 7 Good Good 5.0 No No tag Wonder' dogwood B 9311 Amelanchier alnifolia Serviceberry 3.6 4 Good Good 6.0 No No tag B 9310 Amelanchier alnifolia Serviceberry 2.4 4 Good Good 6.0 No B 9309 Amelanchier alnifolia Serviceberry 4.7 5 Good Good 6.0 No B 5415 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 15.6 18 Good Good 30.0 No No tag
B 5414 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 11.0 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5413 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 9.2 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5412 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 9.5 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5411 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 6.5 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5410 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 12.0 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5409 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 13.7 18 Good Good 30.0 No
Tree Solutions, Inc. www.treesolutions.net 2940 Westlake Ave. N (Suite #200) Seattle, WA 98109 Page 1 of 5 206‐528‐4670
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 51 APPENDIX
Table of Trees Date of Inventory: 11.08.2017; 11.10.2016; 06.20.2017 UW Population Health Table Prepared: 12.05.2016; 07.27.2017 Site B ‐ Seattle, WA
B 5408 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 10.9 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5407 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 16.1 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5406 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 9.3 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5405 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 9.5 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5404 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 16.7 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5403 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 18.5 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5402 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 14.1 18 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5416 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 15.9 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5417 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 9.0 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5418 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 9.6 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5419 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 11.1 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5420 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 10.7 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5421 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 11.0 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5422 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 10.1 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5423 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 8.2 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5424 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 10.5 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5425 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 11.8 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5426 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 9.9 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5427 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 11.6 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5428 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 4.0 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5429 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 10.5 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5430 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 15.3 9.1, 12.3 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5431 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 9.9 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5432 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 13.5 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5433 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 15.7 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5434 Thuja plicata 'Zebrina' Western redcedar 14.3 19 Good Good 30.0 No
B 5443 Pinus coulteri Coulter pine 11.8 15 Good Good 30.0 No B 5435 Pinus coulteri Coulter pine 35.5 28 Good Good 30.0 Yes B 5436 Ilex aquifolium English holly 3.6 6 Good Poor 18.8 No Partially removed Tree Solutions, Inc. www.treesolutions.net 2940 Westlake Ave. N (Suite #200) Seattle, WA 98109 Page 2 of 5 206‐528‐4670
52 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 APPENDIX
Table of Trees Date of Inventory: 11.08.2017; 11.10.2016; 06.20.2017 UW Population Health Table Prepared: 12.05.2016; 07.27.2017 Site B ‐ Seattle, WA
B 5437 Malus spp. Apple 6.0 10 Fair Poor 20.0 No Suppressed B 5439 Malus spp. Apple 6.0 10 Fair Poor 20.0 No Suppressed B 5438 Ilex aquifolium English holly 4.0 6 Good Poor 18.8 No B 5440 Pinus densiflora Japanese red pine 22.7 16 Good Good 20.0 Yes B 5441 Pinus densiflora Japanese red pine 23.0 15 Good Good 20.0 Yes B 5442 Pinus coulteri Coulter pine 29.7 Good Good 30.0 No Overhangs street, heavy cone load B1 Chamacyparis Lawson cypress 6.5 9 Good Fair 30.0 No Not tagged by UW, strange form lawsoniana B 5446 Ulmus procera English elm 36.7 34 Good Good 30.0 Yes B 5445 Ulmus procera English elm 34.7 28 Good Good 30.0 Yes Large pruning cut with possible decay, limited root space, overhangs sidewalk B 5447 Ailanthus altissima Tree of heaven 17.2 11 Fair Fair 30.0 No B 5448 Fraxinus latifolia Oregon ash 10.7 13 Fair Fair 24.0 No B 5449 Aesculus hippocasta‐ Horse chestnut 18.7 12.1, 14.2 18 Good Good 30.0 No num B 5450 Pinus coulteri Coulter pine 24.9 20 Good Good 30.0 No Trunk lean over road, corrected. girdling root B 5451 Chamacyparis Lawson cypress 8.8 5.9, 4, 5.2 10 Good Fair 30.0 No lawsoniana B2 Chamacyparis Lawson cypress 7.0 10 Good Fair 30.0 No Not tagged by UW lawsoniana B 5452 Malus spp. Apple 9.9 6.2, 7.7 13 Good Fair 20.0 No B 5454 Pinus densiflora Japanese red pine 25.5 22 Good Good 20.0 Yes B 5455 Prunus emarginata Bitter cherry 9.8 14 Fair Poor Only in No Ivy on trunk, broken top, asymmetrical canopy Grove B 5456 Pinus densiflora Japanese red pine 26.9 22 Good Good 20.0 Yes Bowed trunk B 5457 Malus spp. Apple 16.5 16 Good Good 20.0 No Measured at narrowest point below union B 5458 Pinus sylvestris Scots pine 6.7 7 Fair Good 24.0 No Suppressed B 5459 Pinus sylvestris Scots pine 7.3 8 Good Good 24.0 No Slightly suppressed B 5461 Malus spp. Apple 7.7 4.7, 6.1 14 Fair Fair 20.0 No B 5462 Malus spp. Apple 6.0 9 Poor Poor 20.0 No B 5463 Pinus sylvestris Scots pine 13.6 13 Good Good 24.0 No B 5464 Pinus thunbergii Japanese black pine 3.6 5 Fair Good 15.8 No Suppressed B 5460 Betula nigra River birch 15.2 18 Fair Poor 25.4 No Past top failure, basal hollow B 5466 Pinus thunbergii Japanese black pine 3.8 5 Good Good 15.8 No B 5465 Pinus thunbergii Japanese black pine 2.4 5 Good Good 15.8 No B 5467 Pinus sylvestris Scots pine 14.6 14 Good Good 24.0 No B 5468 Prunus laurocerasus Cherry laurel 14.7 7, 7.1, 5.9, 15 Good Good 26.2 No No tag 4.9, 7.7 B 5469 Cornus kousa Kousa dogwood 7.4 2.6, 2, 2, 2.4, 10 Good Good 12.0 No tag enveloped 2.4, 2.5, 2.4 2.4, 2.2, 2.5
B 5471 Carpinus betulus European hornbeam 15.8 22 Good Good 16.0 No No tag
B 5472 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 12.8 24 Good Good 11.9 Yes No tag, surface roots
B 5473 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 9.7 18 Good Good 11.9 No No tag, surface roots
B 5474 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 14.4 20 Good Good 11.9 Yes No tag, surface roots
B 5470 Carpinus betulus European hornbeam 13.1 18 Good Good 16.0 No tag enveloped
B 5475 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 12.1 19 Good Good 11.9 Yes No tag, surface roots
B 5483 Pinus sylvestris Scots pine 7.7 7 Good Good 24.0 No Enclosed by building Tree Solutions, Inc. www.treesolutions.net 2940 Westlake Ave. N (Suite #200) Seattle, WA 98109 Page 3 of 5 206‐528‐4670
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 53 APPENDIX
Table of Trees Date of Inventory: 11.08.2017; 11.10.2016; 06.20.2017 UW Population Health Table Prepared: 12.05.2016; 07.27.2017 Site B ‐ Seattle, WA
B 5484 Pinus sylvestris Scots pine 8.1 7 Good Good 24.0 No Enclosed by building B 5485 Cinnamomum Camphor laurel 6.4 8 Good Good 30.0 No No tag camphora B 5486 Chamaecyparis pisifera Sawara cypress 22.9 15 Good Good 26.9 No Some dieback in upper canopy
B 5477 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 9.9 19 Good Good 11.9 No No tag, surface roots
B 5476 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 12.0 19 Good Good 11.9 Yes No tag, surface roots
B 5487 Betula nigra River birch 12.0 20 Good Good 25.4 No Phototropic lean Additional Scope Area 06.20.2017 B 12188 Ulmus accolade Accolade elm 4.5 8 Good Good 30.0 No Grafted base B 12187 Ulmus accolade Accolade elm 5.8 9 Good Good 30.0 No 12186 removed B 9306 Cornus nuttallii Pacific dogwood 3.1 6 Fair Good 6.0 No Poor pruning, damaged from hatchet, foliage chlorotic, branches ripped off B 5372 Pinus contorta Shore pine 9.1 6 Good Good 12.0 No B 5376 Pinus contorta Shore pine 9.0 8 Good Fair 12.0 No Codominant union, 9303‐5 removed B 9301 Malus tschonoskii Tschonoskii apple 4.3 5 Good Good 30.0 No B 12071 Malus tschonoskii Tschonoskii apple 2.0 2 Good Good 30.0 No B 9302 Malus tschonoskii Tschonoskii apple 3.9 6 Good Good 30.0 No B 9299 Malus tschonoskii Tschonoskii apple 5.8 7 Good Good 7.0 No B 9295 Malus tschonoskii Tschonoskii apple 5.7 7 Good Good 30.0 No B 9300 Malus tschonoskii Tschonoskii apple 3.5 3 Good Good 30.0 No Leaf damage from caterpillar, 9296‐8 removed B 9288 Acer x freemanii Armstrong maple 8.6 12 Good Good 20.8 No armstrong B 9289 Acer x freemanii Armstrong maple 6.8 9 Good Good 20.8 No armstrong B 9290 Acer x freemanii Armstrong maple 9.3 12 Good Good 20.8 No armstrong B 9291 Acer x freemanii Armstrong maple 8.0 12 Good Good 20.8 No armstrong B 9292 Acer x freemanii Armstrong maple 7.2 10 Good Good 20.8 No armstrong B 9293 Acer x freemanii Armstrong maple 7.0 11 Good Good 20.8 No armstrong B 4680 Pinus contorta Shore pine 6.4 7 Good Good 12.0 No B 4681 Cedrus deodara Deodar cedar 31.8 24 Good Good 30.0 Yes Strong lean west with good compression wood growth, adjacent to fire hydrant, truck damage on branches to south ‐ clearance pruning may be necessary B 4682 Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf maple 28.4 30 Good Fair 30.0 No Tag 33, central trunk die back B 12189 Quercus nigra Water oak 39.7 30 Good Fair 25.0 Yes Massive crown, overall in good shape, some unions with included bark, minimal visible decsy B 12190 Cedrus deodara Deodar cedar 27.0 18 Good Fair 30.0 No Trunk wetted by sprinkler, several codominant trunks with narrow angles, canopy phototropic to west ‐ perfrom crown reduction to west and adjust sprinkler away from tree trunk B 4679 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 9.9 13 Good Good 11.9 No Some leaf damage, caterpillar?
B 5481 Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam 14.0 23 Good Good 11.9 Yes Some leaf damage, caterpillar?
B 5478 Pinus bungeana Lacebark pine 7.0 2.7, 2.7, 2.5, 8 Good Good 9.5 No 3.4, 4 B 5479 Pinus bungeana Lacebark pine 6.9 3.3, 3.0, 2.8, 7 Good Good 9.5 No 3.1, 3.3 B 5480 Pinus bungeana Lacebark pine 6.7 4.0, 3.1, 2.0, 7 Good Good 9.5 No 3.9 Tree Solutions, Inc. www.treesolutions.net 2940 Westlake Ave. N (Suite #200) Seattle, WA 98109 Page 4 of 5 206‐528‐4670
54 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 APPENDIX
Table of Trees Date of Inventory: 11.08.2017; 11.10.2016; 06.20.2017 UW Population Health Table Prepared: 12.05.2016; 07.27.2017 Site B ‐ Seattle, WA
B 5493 Sorbus aucuparia Mountain ash 6.0 10 Good Good 29.0 No 'Cardinal Royal' B 5494 Sorbus aucuparia Mountain ash 6.7 11 Good Good 29.0 No 'Cardinal Royal' B 5495 Sorbus aucuparia Mountain ash 6.9 11 Good Good 29.0 No 'Cardinal Royal' B 5496? Sorbus aucuparia Mountain ash 8.0 13 Good Good 29.0 No Not shown on scope map, no tags found 'Cardinal Royal' B 5497? Sorbus aucuparia Mountain ash 7.6 12 Good Good 29.0 No Not shown on scope map, no tags found 'Cardinal Royal' B 5491 Sorbus aucuparia Mountain ash 4.5 4 Good Good 29.0 No 'Cardinal Royal' B 5492 Sorbus aucuparia Mountain ash 4.3 4 Poor Poor 29.0 No Barely alive 'Cardinal Royal' B 5490 Sorbus aucuparia Mountain ash 6.4 4 Poor Fair 29.0 No Decayed, barely alive 'Cardinal Royal' B 5489 Sorbus aucuparia Mountain ash 6.2 5 Poor Poor 29.0 No Decayed, barely alive 'Cardinal Royal' B 5541 Cedrus deodara Deodar cedar 35.0 31 Good Good 30.0 Yes Some browning foliage B 5542 Cedrus deodara Deodar cedar 33.4 32 Good Good 30.0 Yes Codominant trunks at 30 feet B 5543 Cedrus deodara Deodar cedar 35.3 25 Good Good 30.0 Yes B 5544 Cedrus deodara Deodar cedar 38.8 30 Good Good 30.0 Yes B 12209 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 13.9 3.5, 3.8, 3.7, 9 Good Good 10.2 Yes Not tagged or shown on map 3.8, 4.1, 2.9, 6.9, 3.0, 4.2, 2.9, 3.4, 3.0, 3.3 B 12210 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 6.6 5.6, 2, 2, 2 6 Good Good 10.2 No Suppressed, not tagged or shown on map B 12208 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 6.2 9 Good Good 10.2 No Not tagged or shown on map B 5540 Pinus contorta Shore pine 5.8 7 Good Good 12.0 No B 5539 Pinus contorta Shore pine 5.4 8 Good Good 12.0 No B 12201 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 11.0 5.4, 4.0, 5.2, 13 Good Good 10.2 Yes Canopy in contact with building, not tagged or on shown map 2, 5.8, 3.5 B 12202 Quercus sp. Oak 7.2 7.2 11 Good Good No Not tagged or shown on map B 12203 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 9.1 6, 6.8 9 Good Good 10.2 No Canopy in contact with building, not tagged or shown on map B 12204 Prunus laurocerasus Cherry laurel 8.6 14 Good Good 26.2 No Not tagged or shown on map, growing against wall B 12205 Quercus sp. Oak 9.1 14 Good Good No Not tagged or shown on map B 12206 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 11.5 7.1, 6.4, 6.4 11 Good Good 10.2 Yes Canopy in contact with building, not tagged or shown on map B 12207 Arbutus unedo Strawberry tree 9.5 4.4, 4.3, 4.7, 11 Good Good 10.2 No Not tagged or shown on map 4.6, 3 Additional notes: DSH (Diameter at Standard Height) was measured 4.5 feet above average grade, unless noted otherwise. Multi‐stem trees are noted, and a single‐stem equivalent diameter was calculated using the method defined in the Director's Rule 16‐2008. Red font in the DSH column indicates a tree less than 6 inches DSH (non‐significant). Drip line radius was measured from the center of the tree to the outermost extent of the canopy.
Tree Solutions, Inc. www.treesolutions.net 2940 Westlake Ave. N (Suite #200) Seattle, WA 98109 Page 5 of 5 206‐528‐4670
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 55 APPENDIX ¸ t e e F 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 SITE B | 106 Trees
56 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 APPENDIX
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 57 APPENDIX
58 POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY SDCI#3028469 STREAMLINED DESIGN REVIEW SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 APPENDIX
LEASE CRUTCHER LEWIS | MILLER HULL | UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: POPULATION HEALTH FACILITY 59 Seattle Polson Building 71 Columbia - Sixth Floor Seattle, WA 98104 T: 206.682.6837 San Diego Mission Brewery 2150 West Washington Street Suite 113 San Diego, CA 92110 T: 619.220.0984 www.millerhull.com