DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded and Overlayed a Overlaying Part I: Our Methodology Hydrology Layer from Massgis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded and Overlayed a Overlaying Part I: Our Methodology Hydrology Layer from Massgis 1 l 1 1 1 1 The Spicket River Greenway: An Investigation of Parcels, Policies and Best Practices 1 1 Prepared for Groundwork Lawrence April 23,2003 Darien Crimmin Jennifer Lappin . Kim Sherman 1 1 2 1 / a Acknowledgements We would like to thank Kate Gormly and Marianne Paley for giving us the opportunity to participate in research relevant to the development of the Spicket River Greenway. We are also grateful to Alex at Groundwork Lawrence for helping us to visit the Spicket River and the surrounding neighborhoods. Additionally, we very much appreciated the incredible resources and support provided by the staff at Lawrence Community Works. 3 1 Table of Contents: Executive Summary Page 5 Part I: Our Methodology Page 5 Part II: Easements and Land Conservation Page 7 Part III: The Rivers Protection Act Page 16 Part IV: Real World Example Page 17 Recommendations Page 18 Conclusions Page 18 Appendixes Page 20 4 1 Executive Summary The objective of this report is to provide Groundwork Lawrence with land parcel deed research, procedural recommendations, and case studies relevant to the process of developing a 2.3 mile greenway along the Spicket River in North Lawrence. Specifically, this report summarizes our methodology in identifying relevant land parcels, investigating ownership and contamination status, and storing information in GIS maps and excel databases. Additionally, our report provides preliminary recommendations for approaching the process of obtaining the land easements necessary to the prospective greenway's development. Finally, the report includes reflections and recommendations from a seasoned greenway planner. Our recommendations can be summarized as follows: 1. Prioritize objectives for obtaining easements. 2. Anticipate landowner questions regarding liability, safety, property values, tax implications, and perpetuity of conservation restrictions. 3. To strengthen the permanence of conservation restrictions, consider having more than one entity hold the fee title and conservation restriction for a parcel. With more than one entity involved, reversing a conservation restriction becomes much more difficult. 4. Develop a sound maintenance and greenway management plan including appropriate signage, lighting, and security. 5. Communicate with land trusts, other greenway developers, and legal experts to discuss nuts and bolts details of land acquisition and real-world greenway development strategies. Next, we downloaded and overlayed a Overlaying Part I: Our Methodology hydrology layer from MassGIS. a map with hydrology enabled us to select Step 1: Identifying Parcels In order to identify relevant parcels and research ownership status, The Tufts' Groundwork Lawrence Greenway Team began with a GIS parcel map of Lawrence parcels that were adjacent to the Spicket provided by Lawrence Community Works. River (on both sides of the river). Our GIS 5 map is attached in Appendix A and is also a simple record of the deed' s existence; for provided in a CD. other parcels there was an actual copy of the deed online. We found a copy or record of ~ Step 2: Creating a Database the deed online for about one third of our Next, we exported the GIS attribute table for parcels. We found additional deeds at the the selected parcels into an excel document, office of the Registry of Deeds in Lawrence. thereby creating the beginnings of our The oldest deeds (pre-1870) are stored in greenway database. The attribute table Salem. Appendix B includes copies of all included the map and lot number for each available deeds. parcel (also known as the Assessor Tax ID number), the address or location of that Step 4: Identifying Department of parcel, as well as the names and addresses of Environmental Protection Hazards the grantors and grantees, if known. We After creating a database of parcels adjacent used the Lawrence tax assessors' database, to the Spicket River, we obtained a provided by Lawrence Community Works, Massachusetts Department of to add book and page numbers, indicating Environmental Protection (DEP) database where in the city' s records the deeds for that indicated which Lawrence parcels are particular parcels could be found. The contaminated. The database also indicates assessor's database did not list book and the particular type of contaminant found in page numbers for all of our parcels; we each parcel. By comparing the DEP added the information, if it was available. database with our Spicket parcels database, we were able to identify parcels adjacent to Step 3: Deed Research the Spicket River that were recently Having created a preliminary database, we contaminated. We indicated contaminated began the process of uncovering the deeds parcels in our database on an attached for our parcels. Fortunately, some deeds worksheet. Information on contaminated were available online at parcels should help inform the process of Lawrencedeeds.com. The site allows greenway development along the Spicket. visitors to search for deeds by grantee or grantor, parcel address, or book and page number. For some parcels the site contained 6 possible to envision a riverside trail. At the Step 5: Photographing Parcels and Lawrence Family Health Center site, we Hyperlinking to GIS noticed that if the guardrail in the parking lot While maps and databases are helpful tools could be moved in a few feet, there would for organizing the extensive amount of be room for a path between the rail and the information pertaining to the greenway, site river. We also noted the aesthetic and visits and photos can help bring that educational potential of some of the bridges information to life in a meaningful way. that cross over the Spicket. What if signage With that in mind, the Tufts Groundwork on these bridges encouraged pedestrians or Greenway Team made two trips to bikers to take notice of the river below? Lawrence to follow the river, photographing Finally, we met some of the shop-owners key parcels along the way. We hyperlinked and resident-neighbors of the Spicket, the photos to our GIS map; clicking on including a pre-schooler who scolded us for certain parcels with the hyperlink tool brings going too close to the river. "You're NOT up the photograph of that parcel. supposed to go down there! !" Our informal contact with Spicket River neighbors, Step 6: Reflections on Challenges and reinforced for us the idea that the river exists Opportunities Posed by the Spicket not just in an ecological context, but within Viewing the river up-close and following it a social context, too; developing the through North Lawrence added a new greenway, as Groundwork Lawrence already dimension to our understanding of the knows, is as much about the people of project. We noticed the immense amount of Lawrence as it is about the river itself. trash currently being dumped in the river. Everything from strollers to refrigerators to Part II: Easements & Land fifty-five gallon drums could be found in the Conservation river, strewn along its banks, and scattered What is an Easement? across adjacent properties. In many places, In order to create a riverside trail with buildings were built right up to the Spicket, continuous public access, Groundwork posing challenges to the river and to the Lawrence may wish to obtain easements greenway. At the same time, we prospective from landowners granting public access to encouraged to see parcels where it was were properties adjacent to the river. 7 1 Additionally, Groundwork Lawrence may does the organization plan to do with the wish to secure conservation restrictions, land? Which land uses will be prohibited prohibiting certain types of development and which uses will be permitted? How will along the greenway. the land be maintained? Why is this specific An easement (or restriction) is a legal parcel important and how will the greenway, agreement between a landowner and a as a whole, benefit the community? recipient (such as a conservation organization) that enables the landowner to retain ownership, while agreeing to specified prohibitions on use and development of the =*#,-h-* property. The specified limitations will vary, depending upon the objectives of the grantor /«'*'. and grantee. Specifications may or may not include a right of public access. An easement may be permanent or for a specified amount of time. The easement Property owners who are asked to grant easements are likely to have questions about applies to current and future owners of the liability, safety, and property values. property. The document gives the recipient organization the right to monitor the Liability Questions and Strategies property and enforce the agreement The organization should be prepared to (www.thetrustees.org/pages/44_techniques.c address a wide variety of landowner questions and concerns. Liability is an especially strong concern for many Prior to Approaching Landowners: landowners. The following sections provide Prioritize Objectives and Anticipate a brief overview of liability questions and Questions solutions. Before approaching owners, it is important to have clear objectives and a strong sense Will I get sued if someone gets hurt on my of the prospective benefits of the greenway land? project. Does the organization wish to A landowner might fear that granting public obtain a gift or an easement? What exactly access to his or her land makes him or her 8 legally responsible for injuries or accidents insurance policy is usually minimal (Morris, that happen on the land. Similarly, adjacent 2000). landowners might have liability questions Adjacent landowners also have limited concerning the possibility that greenway liability in the event that greenway users users will stray onto their properties. The wander, uninvited, onto their property. The landowner should know that a recreational organization can work with adjacent use statute provides legal protection to those landowners to reduce their liability by who open their land for public use, provided creating signage or fencing that clearly they do not charge an access fee. Without marks the boundaries of the greenway.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MMI 53 River Street Dam.Pdf
    TOWN OF ACTON JUNE 7, 2019 | ACTON, MA PROPOSAL Studies Related to the Dam Located at 53 River Street June 7, 2019 Mr. John Mangiaratti, Town Manager Town of Acton Town Manager’s Office 472 Main Street Acton, MA 01720 RE: River Street Dam Removal and Fort Pond Brook Restoration Acton, Massachusetts MMI #4458-02 Dear Mr. Mangiaratti: The Milone & MacBroom team of structural engineers, bridge scour experts, geotechnical engineers, and hydraulic engineers are uniquely qualified to design the dam removal, and evaluate the potential upstream and downstream infrastructure impacts associated with the removal of the Dam at River Street to improve ecological functions of the Fort Pond Brook. When reviewing our proposal, we ask that you consider the following: Our team brings expertise and a proven track record of success in dam removal projects throughout New England. Milone & MacBroom professionals have backgrounds in hydrology and hydraulics, engineering design, fisheries expertise, and wetland biology. Our staff also includes invasive species experts, fisheries biologists, and permitting specialists. We also integrate the creative innovation of our extensive in-house team of landscape architects and frequently include passive recreational park features at our dam removal sites. We have the ability to integrate dam removal with the natural site opportunities through careful analysis and planning so that your project is technically sound, environmentally sensitive, and aesthetically pleasing. Our team of experts has performed many dam removal projects throughout New England and the Northeast. Milone and MacBroom are pioneers in the field, having completed our first dam removals in the 1990s. With over 40 constructed dam removal projects, we have completed more than any other design firm in the Northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Methuen Report.Pdf
    SUMMARY OF FINDINGS METHUEN MUNICIPAL VULNERABILITY PREPAREDNESS COMMUNITY RESILIENCE BUILDING JUNE 2019 CITY OF METHUEN With assistance from Merrimack Valley Planning Commission & Horsley Witten Group 1 Table of Contents Executive Order 569 and the Massachusetts Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness Program ......................................................................................................................3 Planning Project Vision Statement ..............................................................................5 Climate Data for Methuen and the Shawsheen Basin .................................................7 Methuen Demographics .............................................................................................9 Top Hazards for Methuen ......................................................................................... 11 Concerns & Challenges Presented by Hazards and Climate Change ........................... 14 Methuen Infrastructure & Critical Facilities – Vulnerabilities Identified .................... 14 Methuen Societal Features – Vulnerabilities Identified ............................................. 17 Methuen Environmental Features – Vulnerabilities Identified .................................. 19 Community Strengths & Assets ................................................................................. 21 Top Recommendations for a More Resilient Methuen .............................................. 24 Appendices ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TWO RIVERS MASTER PLAN a Recreational Trail Through the City
    BROCKTON TWO RIVERS MASTER PLAN A Recreational Trail through the City CITY OF BROCKTON | Mayor James E. Harrington | City Planner Nancy Stack Savoie Hubert Murray Architect + Planner | July 2008 2 Introduction 0 Program Goals / Common Issues 0 Strategies for Action 07 Area Analyses and Proposals 19 Study Area 01 20 Study Area 02 26 Study Area 0 4 Study Area 04 44 Study Area 05 46 Implementation 48 References 52 Appendix | Maps and Aerials 54 TABLE OF CONTENTS MASTER PLAN OVERVIEW For a quick understanding of the Two Rivers Master Plan, read the Introduction (p.1) and Program Goals / Common Issues (p.3). Strategies for Action (pp.7-17) gives an overview of what needs to be done. Area Analyses and Proposals (pp. 19-47) goes into more detail. Implementation (p.48) indicates next steps and funding possibilities. 20 miles radius from Brockton 5.44 miles E-W HOLBROOK ABINGTON AVON STOUGHTON WHITMAN 5.8 miles N-S EASTON EAST BRIDGEWATER WEST BRIDGEWATER William L. Douglas, shoe manufacturer and retailer, was elected governor of the Commonwealth for the term 905-906. INTRODUCTION Purpose On the other hand, city government has managed to urban parks have been created in the center of The purpose of this study is to provide an overview attract a number of government offices to provide the city as the beginnings of an urban open space of the recreational and environmental potential for local employment as well as attracting federal and system known as the Salisbury Greenway. Frederick restoring and enhancing the urban environment state investment programs in housing, education and Douglass Way (formerly High Street) has been through which Brockton’s Two Rivers run.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Lawrence 2004 Open Space Plan
    CITY OF LAWRENCE 2004 OPEN SPACE PLAN Michael J. Sullivan, Mayor Prepared by the City of Lawrence Office of Planning and Development and Groundwork Lawrence City of Lawrence 2004 Open Space Plan CITY OF LAWRENCE 2004 OPEN SPACE PLAN Table of Contents Section 1: Executive Summary 5 Section 2: Introduction 9 A. Statement of Purpose B. Planning Process and Public Participation Section 3: Community Setting 11 A. Regional Context B. History of the Community C. Population Characteristics D. Growth and Development Patterns Section 4: Environmental Inventory and Analysis 17 A. Geology, Soil and Topology B. Landscape Character C. Water Resources D. Vegetation E. Fisheries and Wildlife F. Scenic Resources and Unique Environments G. Environmental Challenges Section 5: Inventory of Lands of Conservation and Recreation Interest 25 A. Private Parcels B. Public and Non-Profit Parcels Section 6: Community Vision 29 A. Description of Process B. Statement of Open Space and Recreation Goals Section 7: Analysis of Needs 31 1 City of Lawrence 2004 Open Space Plan A. Summary of Resource Protection Needs B. Summary of Community’s Needs C. Management Needs, Potential Changes of Use Section 8: Goals and Objectives 39 Section 9: Five-Year Action Plan 42 Section 10: Public Comments 48 Section 11: References 49 Attachment A: Maps Open Space Improvements Since 1997 Regional Context Land Use Lawrence Census Tracts Lawrence Voting Wards Zoning Districts Recreational and Conservation Areas Population Density Density of Children Ages 0-5 Density of Children Ages 6-15
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality
    LAWRENCE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT LIHI APPLICATION ATTACHMENT B WATER QUALITY 314 CMR 4.00: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4.06: continued 314 CMR 4.00 : DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4.06: continued TABLE 20 MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN BOUNDARY MILE POINT CLASS QUALIFIERS Merrimack River State line to Pawtucket Dam 49.8 - 40.6 B Warm Water Treated Water Supply CSO Pawtucket Dam to Essex Dam, 40.6 - 29.0 B Warm Water Lawrence Treated Water Supply CSO Essex Dam, Lawrence to 29.0 - 21.9 B Warm Water Little River, Haverhill CSO Little River, Haverhill to 21.9 - 0.0 SB Shellfishing Atlantic Ocean CSO The Basin in the Merrimack River - SA Shellfishing Estuary, Newbury and Newburyport Stony Brook Entire Length 10.3 - 0.0 B Warm Water Beaver Brook State line to confluence 4.2 - 0.0 B Cold Water with Merrimack River Spicket River State line to confluence 6.4 -0.0 B Warm Water with Merrimack River Little River State line to confluence with 4.3 - 0.0 B Warm Water Merrimack River Cobbler Brook Entire Length 3.7 - 0.0 B Cold Water Powwow River Outlet Lake Gardner to tidal 6.4 - 1.3 B Warm Water portion Tidal portion 1.3 - 0.0 SB Shellfishing Plum Island River North of High Sandy sand bar SA Shellfishing Outstanding Resource Water 1 Water quality standards for Class B and Class SB waters Designated Use/Standard Parameter Support ≥ 5.0 mg/l Inland waters, Class B, Dissolved Oxygen ≥ 60% saturation unless background conditions warm water fishery lower Massachusetts waters, MADEP Temperature ≤ 28.3ºC (83ºF) pH 6.0 to 8.3 S.U.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of LAWRENCE 2009 OPEN SPACE and RECREATION PLAN
    CITY OF LAWRENCE 2009 OPEN SPACE and RECREATION PLAN Prepared by Groundwork Lawrence for The City of Lawrence Community Development Department Table of Contents Section 1: Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1 Section 2: Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2 Section 3: Community Setting ............................................................................................................ 3 Section 4: Environmental Inventory and Analysis ............................................................................ 11 Section 5: Inventory of Lands of Conservation and Recreation Interest ......................................... 24 Section 6: Community Vision............................................................................................................ 33 Section 7: Analysis of Need .............................................................................................................. 35 Section 8: Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................................... 42 Section 9: Seven Year Action Plan .................................................................................................... 43 List of Appendices Appendix A: Maps Appendix B: Meeting Notes Appendix C: Survey Results Appendix D: Outreach Appendix E: Regional and Local Trail Initiatives Appendix F: Natural
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 57, No. 2 Massachusetts Archaeological Society
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Journals and Campus Publications Society Fall 1996 Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 57, No. 2 Massachusetts Archaeological Society Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/bmas Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Copyright © 1996 Massachusetts Archaeological Society This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. BULLETIN OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 57 (2) FALL 1996 CONTENTS: Maugua the Bear in Northeastern Indian Mythology and Archaeology . Michael A. Volmar 37 A Cache of Middle Archaic Ground Stone Tools from Lawrence, Massachusetts . James W. Bradley 46 Sunconewhew: "Phillip's Brother" ? . Terence G. Byrne and Kathryn Fairbanks 50 An Archaeological Landscape in Narragansett, Rhode Island: Point Judith Upper Pond . Alan Leveillee and Burr Harrison 58 Indigenous Peoples' Control over and Contribution to Archaeology in the United States of America: Some Issues Shirley Blancke and John Peters Slow Turtle 64 Assistant Editor's Note 68 Brief Note on Submissions 45 Contributors 68 THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOWGICAL SOCIETY, Inc. P.O.Box 700, Middleborough, Massachusetts 02346 MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Officers: Curtiss Hoffman, 58 Hilldale Rd., Ashland, MA 01721 President Betsy McGrath, 89 Standish Ave., Plymouth, MA 02360 ...................... .. Vice President Thomas Doyle, P.O. Box 1708, North Eastham, MA 02651 Clerk Irma Blinderman, 31 Buckley Rd., Worcester, MA 01602 Treasurer Ruth Warfield, 13 Lee St., Worcester, MA 01602 Museum Coordinator, Past President Elizabeth Little, 37 Conant Rd., Lincoln, MA 01773 Bulletin Editor Lesley H. Sage, 33 West Rd., 2B, Orleans, MA 02653 ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Salmon EFH the Proposed EFH Designation for Atlantic Salmon
    Atlantic salmon EFH The proposed EFH designation for Atlantic salmon includes the rivers, estuaries, and bays that are listed in Table 31 and shown in Map 105, which exhibit the environmental conditions defined in the text descriptions. Smaller tributaries not shown on the map are also EFH for one or more life stage as long as they conform to the proposed habitat descriptions. All EFH river systems form a direct connection to the sea, but EFH would not include portions of rivers above naturally occurring barriers to upstream migration or land-locked lakes and ponds. The oceanic component of EFH is to a distance of three miles from the mouth of each river. The new designation includes six new drainage systems not included in the original list of 26 rivers that were designated in 1998. All of them are in the Maine coastal sub-region (Chandler, Indian, Pleasant, St. George, Medomak, and Pemaquid rivers). All told, 30 river systems in nine New England sub-regions are designated for Atlantic salmon EFH. The new map includes a more continuous series of bays and areas adjacent to river mouths that are within three miles of the coast. Designated EFH in Long Island Sound has been reduced to small areas where the Connecticut and Pawcatuck Rivers empty into the sound, rather than taking up the entire sound. Also, there are a number of improvements in the text descriptions which make the habitat requirements for each life stage more specific and applicable to three separate juvenile life stages (fry, parr, and smolts). Text descriptions: Essential fish habitat for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) is designated as the rivers, estuaries, and bays that are listed in Table 31 and shown in Map 105.
    [Show full text]
  • 314 Cmr 4.00: Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards
    Disclaimer The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) provides this file for download from its Web site for the convenience of users only. Please be aware that the OFFICIAL versions of all state statutes and regulations (and many of the MassDEP policies) are only available through the State Bookstore or from the Secretary of State’s Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR) Subscription Service. When downloading regulations and policies from the MassDEP Web site, the copy you receive may be different from the official version for a number of reasons, including but not limited to: • The download may have gone wrong and you may have lost important information. • The document may not print well given your specific software/ hardware setup. • If you translate our documents to another word processing program, it may miss/skip/lose important information. • The file on this Web site may be out-of-date (as hard as we try to keep everything current). If you must know that the version you have is correct and up-to-date, then purchase the document through the state bookstore, the subscription service, and/or contact the appropriate MassDEP program. 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 314 CMR 4.00: MASSACHUSETTS SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS Section 4.01: General Provisions 4.02: Definitions 4.03: Application of Standards 4.04: Antidegradation Provisions 4.05: Classes and Criteria 4.06: Basin Classification and Maps 4.01: General Provisions (1) Title. 314 CMR 4.00 shall be known as the "Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards". (2) Organization of the Standards. 314 CMR 4.00 is comprised of six sections, General Provisions (314 CMR 4.01) Definitions (314 CMR 4.02), Application of Standards (314 CMR 4.03), Antidegradation Provisions (314 CMR 4.04), Classes and Criteria (314 CMR 4.05), and Basin Classification and Maps (314 CMR 4.06).
    [Show full text]
  • Provides This File for Download from Its Web Site for the Convenience of Users Only
    Disclaimer The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) provides this file for download from its Web site for the convenience of users only. Please be aware that the OFFICIAL versions of all state statutes and regulations (and many of the MassDEP policies) are only available through the State Bookstore or from the Secretary of State’s Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR) Subscription Service. When downloading regulations and policies from the MassDEP Web site, the copy you receive may be different from the official version for a number of reasons, including but not limited to: • The download may have gone wrong and you may have lost important information. • The document may not print well given your specific software/ hardware setup. • If you translate our documents to another word processing program, it may miss/skip/lose important information. • The file on this Web site may be out-of-date (as hard as we try to keep everything current). If you must know that the version you have is correct and up-to-date, then purchase the document through the state bookstore, the subscription service, and/or contact the appropriate MassDEP program. 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4.06: continued FIGURE LIST OF FIGURES A River Basins and Coastal Drainage Areas 1 Hudson River Basin (formerly Hoosic, Kinderhook and Bashbish River Basins) 2 Housatonic River Basin 3 Farmington River Basin 4 Westfield River Basin 5 Deerfield River Basin 6 Connecticut River Basin 7 Millers River Basin 8 Chicopee River Basin 9 Quinebaug
    [Show full text]
  • Methuen Open Space and Recreation Plan 2013-2020 Ii FORWARD
    CITY OF METHUEN OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN 2013 – 2020 Spicket River Prepared by Methuen Open Space and Recreation Plan Working Group Methuen Open Space and Recreation Plan 2013-2020 ii FORWARD The character of a community is determined not only by its residents and its built structures, but also by its open spaces. These unbuilt places create a unique “landscape identity” for each community. From the very rocks and soils that have sculpted our hills, streams, and ponds; to the woodlots, wetlands, wildflower meadows, and pastures that are the haunts of living creatures large and small – all contribute to a community’s signature setting and “sense of place.” The living landscape we inhabit can serve as a subtle “backdrop” for a community, like the scenery of a play or the background music of a movie. If observed, listened to and understood, the natural environment around us can tell us exactly where we are in the world, much about the history and values of our community, and even help us learn about ourselves. Are we in an urban, suburban or rural community? Are we in an upland area, along a river, or in a coastal plain? Is our neighborhood the site of a former mill complex, or a farm or quarry? Does our community cherish its heritage and place a high value on maintaining a natural landscape, on preserving a place not only for people but for nature, too? As Methuen residents, we each have an opportunity to contribute to the present and future appearance of our community by the manner in which we alter or preserve the land around us.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Flow Inventory
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by State Library of Massachusetts Electronic Repository Low Flow Inventory Summary In 2002, recognizing the need for deeper examination of streamflow alteration and depletion in Massachusetts, Riverways program staff embarked upon what was called the “Low Flow Inventory”. Staff made contact with people around the state regarding observed and/or measured flow alterations in streams large and small. The resulting Low Flow Inventory brought together existing information into one place to enable individuals, communities, and state agencies to access information and observations about streams with unnatural flow problems and to summarize the extent of streamflow alteration and depletion on a statewide basis. Riverways’ goal was to publicize and educate the public about the extent of the flow alteration and to empower local communities to prevent and restore more natural streamflow patterns and volumes in their rivers. For many years this information was accessible as a series of linked pages on our website. Over the years, it was less frequently updated, as our staff were focused on stream gaging through our resulting River Instream Flow Stewards (RIFLS) program. Through RIFLS, we work with local organizations to monitor and address specific cases of flow alteration. With our partners and volunteer gage readers, we have been able to more fully document flow stress in some of the streams identified in the Low Flow Inventory (see www.rifls.org). In recognition that many of the Low Flow Inventory pages were becoming out of date, RIFLS staff moved all of the information from those pages into this single document, accessible on our website.
    [Show full text]