DOCSLIB.ORG

005 Annexes 2-6 to the Third Report Submitted by The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
005 Annexes 2-6 to the Third Report Submitted by The Strasbourg, 9 April 2010 ACFC/SR/III(2010)005 ANNEXES 2-6 TO THE THIRD REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 9 April 2010 Appendix 2 Information about national public associations registered and operating in subjects of the Russian Federation as of 01.01.20081 Quantity of Quantity of Quantity of Quantity of international Code of inter-regional regional local national Subject of the Russian Federation Federal District national Region national public national public public public associations associations associations associations 1 the Republic of Adygeya the Southern Federal District - 1 9 2 2 the Republic of Bashkortostan the Privolzhsky Federal District 2 3 24 - 3 the Republic of Buryatia the Siberian Federal District - 2 14 7 4 the Republic of Altai the Siberian Federal District - 5 - 5 the Republic of Daghestan the Southern Federal District - 5 - 6 the Republic of Ingushetia the Southern Federal District 7 the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic the Southern Federal District 2 9 2 8 the Republic of Kalmykia the Southern Federal District 9 the Karachayevo-Cherkessian Republic the Southern Federal District 10 the Republic of Karelia the Northwestern Federal District - 33 8 11 the Republic of Komi the Northwestern Federal District - 1 10 1 12 the Republic of Mari El the Privolzhsky Federal District - 3 2 6 13 the Republic of Mordovia the Privolzhsky Federal District - 1 6 3 14 the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) the Far Eastern Federal District 12 24 15 the Republic of North Ossetia the Southern Federal District 19 10 16 the Republic of Tatarstan the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 35 17 the Republic of Tyva the Siberian Federal District 4 18 the Republic of Udmurtia the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 28 19 the Republic of Khakassia the Siberian Federal District 2 14 4 20 the Chechen Republic the Southern Federal District 21 the Chuvash Republic the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 11 10 22 the Altai Territory the Siberian Federal District 1 20 19 23 the Krasnodar Territory the Southern Federal District 44 80 24 the Krasnoyarsk Territory the Siberian Federal District 2 42 30 25 the Primorie Territory the Far Eastern Federal District 21 23 26 the Stavropol Territory the Southern Federal District 24 32 27 he Khabarovsk Territory the Far Eastern Federal District 2 17 24 28 the Amur Region the Far Eastern Federal District 14 5 29 the Arkhangelsk Region the Northwestern Federal District 10 4 1 Information was prepared based of data presented by executive authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation to the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation under survey “Information on activities of government bodies of subjects of the Russian Federation in the sphere of implementation of the state national policy and interaction with national public associations in2007”. 30 the Astrakhan Region the Southern Federal District 31 15 31 the Belgorod Region the Central Federal District 32 the Bryansk Region the Central Federal District 2 33 the Vladimir Region the Central Federal District 8 3 34 the Volgograd Region the Southern Federal District 2 21 14 35 the Vologda Region the Northwestern Federal District 7 36 the Voronezh Region the Central Federal District 22 10 37 the Ivanovo Region the Central Federal District 19 4 38 the Irkutsk Region the Siberian Federal District 24 41 39 the Kaliningrad Region the Northwestern Federal District 35 39 40 the Kaluga Region the Central Federal District 7 5 41 the Kamchatka Territory the Far Eastern Federal District 3 20 42 the Kemerovo Region the Siberian Federal District 29 19 43 the Kirov Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 7 7 44 the Kostroma Region the Central Federal District 7 9 45 the Kurgan Region the Ural Federal District 11 7 46 the Kursk Region the Central Federal District 4 5 47 the Leningrad Region the Northwestern Federal District 2 25 5 48 the Lipetsk Region the Central Federal District 4 1 49 the Magadan Region the Far Eastern Federal District 6 5 50 the Moscow Region the Central Federal District 7 51 the Murmansk Region the Northwestern Federal District 20 17 52 the Nizhni Novgorod Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 16 16 53 the Novgorod Region the Northwestern Federal District 6 2 54 the Novosibirsk Region the Siberian Federal District 1 13 33 55 the Omsk Region the Siberian Federal District 1 4 16 56 the Orenburg Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 30 79 57 the Oryol Region the Central Federal District 3 5 58 the Penza Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 7 14 59 the Perm Territory the Privolzhsky Federal District 19 38 60 the Pskov Region the Northwestern Federal District 61 the Rostov Region the Southern Federal District 14 8 62 the Ryazan Region the Central Federal District 1 2 7 4 63 the Samara Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 9 15 1 64 the Saratov Region the Privolzhsky Federal District 65 the Sakhalin Region the Far Eastern Federal District 25 14 66 the Sverdlovsk Region the Ural Federal District 29 46 67 the Smolensk Region the Central Federal District 15 7 68 the Tambov Region the Central Federal District 4 1 69 the Tver Region the Central Federal District 22 6 70 the Tomsk Region the Siberian Federal District - - 13 6 71 the Tula Region the Central Federal District 1 2 7 6 72 the Tyumen Region the Ural Federal District 1 20 2 73 the Ulyanovsk Region the Privolzhsky Federal District - 12 11 74 the Chelyabinsk Region the Ural Federal District 75 the Chita Region the Siberian Federal District - - 12 2 76 the Yaroslav Region the Central Federal District - 25 14 - 77 The city of Moscow the Central Federal District - 3 59 - 78 The city of Saint-Petersburg the Northwestern Federal District More than 200 national public associations 79 the Jewish Autonomous Region the Far Eastern Federal District - - 3 1 80 the Aginsk Buryat Autonomous District the Siberian Federal District - - 1 - 82 the Nenets Autonomous District the Northwestern Federal District - - 3 3 83 the Ust-Ordyn Buryat Autonomous District the Siberian Federal District According to information provided by the Khanty-Mansijsk Office of the Federal Migration Service in the Tumen Region, the Khanty- 84 the Khanty-Mansijsk Autonomous District the Ural Federal District Mansijsk Autonomous District and the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District, there were 65 national public associations registered on the territory of the autonomous district as of 01.01.2008 85 the Chukotka Autonomous District the Far Eastern Federal District 1 - 3 - 86 the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District the Ural Federal District 5 10 Appendix 3 Information about national public associations registered and operating in subjects of the Russian Federation as of 01.01.20092 Quantity of Quantity of Quantity of Quantity of Code of international inter-regional regional local national Subject of the Russian Federation Federal District Region national public national public national public public associations associations associations associations 1 the Republic of Adygeya the Southern Federal District - 1 11 2 2 the Republic of Bashkortostan the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 0 28 - 3 the Republic of Buryatia the Siberian Federal District - 2 15 5 4 the Republic of Altai the Siberian Federal District - 6 - 5 the Republic of Daghestan the Southern Federal District - 1 4 6 the Republic of Ingushetia the Southern Federal District 1 7 the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic the Southern Federal District 2 1 12 2 8 the Republic of Kalmykia the Southern Federal District 8 9 the Karachayevo-Cherkessian Republic the Southern Federal District 1 29 4 10 the Republic of Karelia the Northwestern Federal District - 32 12 11 the Republic of Komi the Northwestern Federal District - 3 13 12 the Republic of Marij El the Privolzhsky Federal District 2 12 8 13 the Republic of Mordovia the Privolzhsky Federal District 7 2 14 the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) the Far Eastern Federal District 19 29 15 the Republic of North Ossetia (Alania) the Southern Federal District 19 9 16 the Republic of Tatarstan the Privolzhsky Federal District - - 25 18 17 the Republic of Tuva the Siberian Federal District 5 18 the Udmurt Republic the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 28 19 the Republic of Khakassia the Siberian Federal District 2 17 3 20 the Chechen Republic the Southern Federal District 2 3 21 The Republic of Chuvash the Privolzhsky Federal District 1 11 10 22 the Altai Territory the Siberian Federal District 1 24 17 23 the Krasnodar Territory the Southern Federal District 1 39 66 24 the Krasnoyarsk Territory the Siberian Federal District 2 37 36 25 the Primorie Territory the Far Eastern Federal District 20 28 26 the Stavropol Territory the Southern Federal District 1 23 55 27 the Khabarovsk Territory the Far Eastern Federal District 2 17 24 28 the Amur Region the Far Eastern Federal District 14 5 29 the Arkhangelsk Region the Northwestern Federal District 13 1 2 Information was prepared based of data presented by executive authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation to the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation under survey “Information on activities of government bodies of subjects of the Russian Federation in the sphere of implementation of the state national policy and interaction with national public associations in2008”. 30 the Astrakhan Region the Southern Federal District 29 24 31 the Belgorod Region the Central Federal District 3 32 the Bryansk Region the Central Federal District 2 33 the Vladimir Region the Central
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Functioning of Political Aphorisms with a Future Meaning in the Media of the International and Russian Regional Languages
    Proceedings of INTCESS 2017 4th International Conference on Education and Social Sciences 6-8 February 2017- Istanbul, Turkey FUNCTIONING OF POLITICAL APHORISMS WITH A FUTURE MEANING IN THE MEDIA OF THE INTERNATIONAL AND RUSSIAN REGIONAL LANGUAGES Flera Ya. Khabibullina1*, Iraida G. Ivanova2 & Maria N. Pirogova3 1Asst. Prof., Mari State University, Russia, [email protected] 2Asst. Prof., Mari State University, Russia, [email protected]. 3Asst. Prof., Gymnasium n° 26 André Malraux, Russia, [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract The article is devoted to a research of problems of contact development of the international and Russian regional languages in the context of the European political discourse on the example of functioning of aphorisms with a future meaning. The expression of the category of future in aphoristic space of world and regional media of languages with different structure – French, Russian, Tatar and Mari – is studied. Special attention is paid to functioning of language / mass aphorisms for expression of the concepts "power" and "politician". The comparative description of proverbs and sayings, appeals, mottoes, slogans, clichés, symbols, quotes is carried out. The most represented aphorisms in a political discourse of the French, Russian, Tatar and Mari media are the aphorisms related to the following lexical semantic fields: foreign / domestic policy, state / country, state structures / services, institutions, parties and political movements, governing bodies, political system, authorities, heads of political structures, parties, movements and their members. Keywords: aphorism, political aphorisms, political discourse, future, power, politician, media. 1. INTRODUCTION Within the framework of functional approach, many researchers, such as M.A. Shelyakina, T.A. Sukhomlina, Y.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Market Selection in the Ural Federal District: Did Sanctions Bring Any Changes?
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 392 Ecological-Socio-Economic Systems: Models of Competition and Cooperation (ESES 2019) Effects of Market Selection in the Ural Federal District: Did Sanctions Bring Any Changes? Oleg Mariev Andrey Pushkarev Anna Sennikova Graduate School of Economics and Graduate School of Economics and Graduate School of Economics and Management Management Management Ural Federal University named after the Ural Federal University named after the Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin; first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin Institute of economics, the Ural branch of Ekaterinburg, Russia Ekaterinburg, Russia Russian Academy of Sciences [email protected] [email protected] Ekaterinburg, Russia [email protected] Abstract—In this research we assess the market selection the developed countries. We present the analysis for the effects on productivity and firm growth. Using data on more Russian regions. than 22 000 manufacturing firms in the Urals Federal District over the period from 2006 to 2017, we conduct aggregated For example, Bottazzi et al. have estimated effects of the labor productivity decomposition at the industry level and then productivity on the revenue growth [1]. Dosi et al., who proceed to estimate the expiatory power of the productivity looked at market selection forces in the USA, Germany, components on revenue growth. Obtained estimates are France, and the UK, conducted similar research [2]. In both compared between two periods – before the international works, authors find a weak role of market selection forces sanctions on Russia and after that.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Finno-Ugrian Cooperation and Foreign Relations
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Eastern Finno-Ugrian cooperation and foreign relations Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4gc7x938 Journal Nationalities Papers, 29(1) ISSN 0090-5992 Author Taagepera, R Publication Date 2001-04-24 DOI 10.1080/00905990120036457 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Nationalities Papers, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2001 EASTERN FINNO-UGRIAN COOPERATION AND FOREIGN RELATIONS Rein Taagepera Britons and Iranians do not wax poetic when they discover that “one, two, three” sound vaguely similar in English and Persian. Finns and Hungarians at times do. When I speak of “Finno-Ugrian cooperation,” I am referring to a linguistic label that joins peoples whose languages are so distantly related that in most world contexts it would evoke no feelings of kinship.1 Similarities in folk culture may largely boil down to worldwide commonalities in peasant cultures at comparable technological stages. The racial features of Estonians and Mari may be quite disparate. Limited mutual intelligibility occurs only within the Finnic group in the narrow sense (Finns, Karelians, Vepsians, Estonians), the Permic group (Udmurts and Komi), and the Mordvin group (Moksha and Erzia). Yet, despite this almost abstract foundation, the existence of a feeling of kinship is very real. Myths may have no basis in fact, but belief in myths does occur. Before denigrating the beliefs of indigenous and recently modernized peoples as nineteenth-century relics, the observer might ask whether the maintenance of these beliefs might serve some functional twenty-first-century purpose. The underlying rationale for the Finno-Ugrian kinship beliefs has been a shared feeling of isolation among Indo-European and Turkic populations.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSION DECISION of 21 December 2005 Amending for The
    L 340/70EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.12.2005 COMMISSION DECISION of 21 December 2005 amending for the second time Decision 2005/693/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to avian influenza in Russia (notified under document number C(2005) 5563) (Text with EEA relevance) (2005/933/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, cessed parts of feathers from those regions of Russia listed in Annex I to that Decision. Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, (3) Outbreaks of avian influenza continue to occur in certain parts of Russia and it is therefore necessary to prolong the measures provided for in Decision 2005/693/EC. The Decision can however be reviewed before this date depending on information supplied by the competent Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 veterinary authorities of Russia. laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), and in particular Article 18(7) thereof, (4) The outbreaks in the European part of Russia have all occurred in the central area and no outbreaks have occurred in the northern regions. It is therefore no longer necessary to continue the suspension of imports of unprocessed feathers and parts of feathers from the Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December latter. 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (2), and in particular Article 22 (6) thereof, (5) Decision 2005/693/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRA Affirms ААА(RU) to the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Ugra, Outlook Stable, and AAA(RU) Lead Analysts: to Bond Issues
    REGIONS RATING PRESS RELEASE THE KHANTY-MANSIYSK AUTONOMOUS OKRUG-UGRA August 17, 2020 ACRA affirms ААА(RU) to the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Ugra, outlook Stable, and AAA(RU) Lead analysts: to bond issues Maxim Parshin, Senior Analyst +7 (495) 139-0480, ext. 225 [email protected] The credit rating of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Ugra (hereinafter, the Region) is based on high regional economic indicators, the high liquidity of the Region’s budget, and low debt load. Maxim Pershin, Expert +7 (495) 139-0485 The Region is located in the Ural Federal District. It is an administrative subject of the [email protected] Russian Federation and at the same time is part of the Tyumen Region.1 The Region’s population is 1.7 mln (1% of Russia’s population). The Region’s GRP amounted to RUB 4.4475 tln in 2018, around 5% of Russia’s total GRP. According to the Region’s assessments, its GRP amounted to RUB 4.4501 tln in 2019. Key rating assessment Low debt load and high budget liquidity. The Region’s debt portfolio is composed factors entirely of bonds with maturities before 2024. The Region’s debt to current revenues ratio was 5% at the end of 2019 and ACRA does not expect it to change significantly by the end of 2020. As of July 1, 2020, the budget’s account balances (including deposits) exceeded total debt by more than seven times and average monthly budget expenses for 6M 2020 by more than five times. The Region has enough accumulated liquidity both for debt payments this year and for financing the 2020 budget deficit.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016
    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Priorities in Terms of Stabilization and Dynamic Upgrading of the Ural Federal District
    RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES URAL BRANCH INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS Priorities in terms of stabilization and dynamic upgrading of the Ural Federal District Tatarkin А.I. Full Member of the RAS Ekaterinburg 2010 Priorities in terms of stabilization and dynamic upgrading of the UFD * Making large-scale social policy with high dynamics of social changes * Accumulation of natural resource potential under advanced reproduction of the mineral base and ecological improvement * Diversification of the raw industry, restructuring and conversion of the military-industrial complex * Transport complex upgrading and integration into a unified transportation scheme of the Russian Federation * Support of innovation-institutional reformation and integration processes in the regional and municipal economy * Enhancement of business solvency, establishment of financial and credit infrastructure Strategic objectives regarding competitive behavior of the UFD 1. Actualization of geostrategic potential of the Ural Federal District (reproduction of the mineral resource base; establishment of efficient system of transportation corridors etc.) 2. Federal objectives (consistent growth of the UFD contribution in GDP of Russia; structural upgrading of the industrial complex through technical and technological reequipment aimed at improvement of national division of labour and interregional specialization and integration etc.) 3. Interregional (district) objectives (stimulation of development of territorial integration processes in the context of the UFD; generation of
    [Show full text]
  • Role of the Road Sector in the Development of the Regional Economy
    ISSN 0798 1015 HOME Revista ESPACIOS ÍNDICES / Index A LOS AUTORES / To the AUTORS Vol. 41 (Issue 01) Year 2020. Page 16 Role of the road sector in the development of the regional economy Papel del sector vial en el desarrollo de la economia regional SIDORENKO, Mikhail M. 1 Received:15/07/2019 • Approved: 11/01/2020 • Published 15/01/20 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Results 4. Conclusions Bibliographic references ABSTRACT: RESUMEN: This study examines the role and importance of the El sector vial desempeña un papel importante para road sector in ensuring the competitiveness of regions garantizar la competi-tividad de las regiones. En este on the basis of the relationship between the technical trabajo de investigación, se realiza un análisis de parameters of the development of the regional road correlación de los parámetros técnicos del desarrollo network and the level of socio-economic development de una red regional de carreteras y el nivel de of the territory revealed by correlation analysis. The desarrollo socioeconómico del territorio. Los resultados results of this research can contribute to proposals for de esta investigación pueden hacer propuestas para improving the regional economic policy in the mejorar la política económi-ca regional en la gestión management of the road sector. del sector vial. Keywords: competitiveness of regions, regional Palabras clave: competitividad de las regiones, economic policy, road sector política económica regional, sector vial 1. Introduction The current development stage of regions in the socio-economic space of the country is characterised by the need to form and permanently develop the competitive advantages and competitive potential of a territory with limited resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Begins Selling Intervention Grain Russian Federation
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 2/2/2011 GAIN Report Number: RS1107 Russian Federation Post: Moscow Russia Begins Selling Intervention Grain Report Categories: Grain and Feed Approved By: Mary Ellen Smith Prepared By: Yelena Vassilieva Report Highlights: Sales of grain from the intervention fund will begin on February 4, 2011. By the end of June 2011 the Government plans to sell at the commodity exchange up to 2.5 million metric tons to livestock producers, feed and flour mills. The start-up price of grain sales will vary by types and by provinces, but the minimum is set at 6,000 rubles ($200) per metric ton. General Information: The Russian Government ordered sales of milling and feed wheat, food quality rye and feed barley from the Intervention Fund. Order No. 63-p of January 26, 2011, was posted on the Russian government web-site on February 1, 2011: http://www.government.ru/gov/results/13992/ which will allow up to 500,000 metric tons of grain to be sold every month until the end of June 2011, at the weekly auctions conducted by the Russian commodity exchange. The minimum price will vary by quality and location from 6,000 rubles ($200) to 7,535 rubles ($251). Grain will be sold to registered livestock producers and to feed and flour mills. The Ministry of Agriculture updated instructions for selling grain from the intervention fund and posted these instructions on the MinAg’s web-site on January 28, 2011: http://www.mcx.ru/documents/document/show/15180..htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Project Environmental Impact 63 5.1
    E1188 TRANSLATION FROM RUSSIAN Preparation stage for the Project on Fire Management in High Conservation Value Forests of the Amur-Sikhote-Alin Ecoregion Grant GEF PPG TF051241 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized F I N A L R E P O R T Project on Fire Management in High Conservation Value Forests of the Amur- Sikhote-Alin Ecoregion Environmental Impact Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized EIA Leader D.Biol. B.A. Voronov Public Disclosure Authorized Khabarovsk – February 2005 2 Summary Report: 125 pages, figures 4, tables 12, references 70, supplements 2 AMUR-SIKHOTE-ALIN ECOREGION, HIGH CONSERVATION VALUE FORESTS, MODEL TERRITORIES, RESERVES, FOREST FIRE MANAGEMNT, CONSERVATION, BIODIVERSITY Analysis and assessment of Project on Fire Management in High Conservation Value Forests of the Amur-Sikhote-Alin Ecoregion Goals: assessment of Project environmental impact and contribution to the implementation of the program on forest fire prevention, elimination and control in the Amur-Sikhote-Alin ecoregion. Present-day situation, trends and opportunities for developing a fire prevention, elimination and control system were in the focus of attention. Existing data and materials have been studied to reveal forest fire impact on environment as well as Project environmental impact. Project under consideration is aimed at improving current fire management system and strengthening protection of ecoregion forests from degradation, which make it extremely socially and ecologically valuable and important. 3 List of Specialists Senior researcher, C.Biol.Sc. A.L. Antonov (Chapter 3) Senior researcher, D.Biol. B.A. Voronov (Introduction, Chapters 2,5,6) Senior researcher, C.Agr.Sc. A.K. Danilin (Chapter 4) Senior researcher, C.Biol.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Government Continues to Support Cattle Sector
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 6/17/2013 GAIN Report Number: RS1335 Russian Federation Post: Moscow Russian Government Continues to Support Cattle Sector Report Categories: Livestock and Products Policy and Program Announcements Agricultural Situation Approved By: Holly Higgins Prepared By: FAS/Moscow Staff Report Highlights: Russia’s live animal imports have soared in recent years, as the Federal Government has supported the rebuilding of the beef and cattle sector in Russia. This sector had been in continual decline since the break-up of the Soviet Union, but imports of breeding stock have resulted in a number of modern ranches. The Russian Federal and oblast governments offer a series of support programs meant to stimulate livestock development in the Russian Federation over the next seven years which are funded at hundreds of billions of Russian rubles (almost $10 billion). These programs are expected to lead to a recovery of the cattle industry. Monies have been allocated for both new construction and modernization of old livestock farms, purchase of domestic and imported of high quality breeding dairy and beef cattle, semen and embryos; all of which should have a direct and favorable impact on livestock genetic exports to Russia through 2020. General Information: Trade Russia’s live animal imports have soared in recent years, as the Federal Government has supported the rebuilding of the beef and cattle sector in Russia. This sector has been in decline since the break-up of the Soviet Union, but imports of breeding stock have resulted in a number of modern ranches which are expected to lead to a recovery of the cattle industry.
    [Show full text]