BJHS Themes (2020), 5,57–74 doi:10.1017/bjt.2020.3 RESEARCH ARTICLE Reading alchemically: guides to ‘philosophical’ practice in early modern England Jennifer M. Rampling* Department of History, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA *Corresponding author: Jennifer M. Rampling, email:
[email protected] Abstract Dozens of early modern treatises claim to offer straightforward instructions on the theory and prac- tice of alchemy, including all the steps necessary to produce the philosophers’ stone and a range of medicinal elixirs. Yet the resulting works often seem to obfuscate more than they explain: omitting vital information, disguising ingredients and practices behind cover names, and describing out- comes that seem, to modern eyes, impossible. Were such ‘instruction manuals’ ever intended to offer guides for actual practice, or did they serve other ends – from attracting patrons to persuading sceptics of the truth of alchemy? Drawing upon alchemical dialogues written, compiled and anno- tated by English alchemists in the late fifteenth and the sixteenth centuries, I argue that these works of ‘philosophical’ alchemy could indeed serve as technical manuals, although not always of the kind we might expect. Such writings offer advice not only on practical techniques, but also on the process of reading alchemically: guiding readers through the exegetical minefield of alchemical writing, in order both to extract meaningful chemical recipes from obscure texts, and to craft the practitioner’s own persona as an alchemical philosopher. Alle the gramarians of Inglond & of fraunce, Can not teche yow those concordance.1 The art of alchemy has no shortage of ‘how-to’ literature. In early modern Europe, men and women with alchemical interests used texts as a major source of information on prac- tice.