REPORT Cave Research Foundation Annual Report for 1988

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REPORT Cave Research Foundation Annual Report for 1988 1988 ANNUAL REPORT Cave Research Foundation Annual Report for 1988 Cave Research Foundation 1019 Maplewood Dr., No. 211 Cedar Falls, lA 50613 USA The Cave Research Foundation (CRF) is a nonprofit corporation formed in 1957 under the laws ofthe Common. wealth of Kentucky. Its purpose is to support scientific research related to caves and karst, to aid in the conservation of cave karst wilderness features, and to assist in the interpretation of caves through education. EDITOR Karen Bradley Lindsley EDITORIAL STAFF R. Pete Lindsley John C. Tinsley Cover Photo: A CRF survey crew working in the Lost Passage, Fitton Cave, Arkansas. (Photo by Pete Lindsley ) Cave Research Foundation 1988 Annual Report. ©1989 by the Cave Research Foundation. Permission is granted to reproduce this material for scientific and educational use. For information write to the Cave Research Foundation, 1019 Maplewood Dr., No. 211, Cedar Falls, lA, 50613 USA. ISBN 0-939748-24-x Published by CAVE BOOKS 756 Harvard Avenue St. Louis, MO 63130 USA CAVE CONSERVATION rhe caves in which we carry out our scientific work and exploration are natural, living laboratories. Without these laboratories, little of what is described in this Annual Report could be studied. The Cave Research Foundation is committed to the preservation of all underground resources. Caves are fragile in many ways. We take considerable care that we do not destroy that which we study because many of the cave features take hundreds ofthousands of years to form. Also, many of the processes that formed the cave passages we travel are no longer active in these areas. People who unthinkingly take or break stalactites and other cave formations cause great and irreparable damage. Cave life, such as blind fish, live in precarious ecological balance in their isolated underground environment. Disturbances, such as causing bats to fly during winter hibernation, can be as fatal to them as shooting them. Caves are wonderful places for research, recreation and adventure. But before you enter a cave, we urge you to first learn how to be a careful and conservation-minded caver by contacting the National Speleological Society, Cave Avenue, Huntsville, AL 35810, USA, for excellent advice and guidance for novice and experienced alike. CAVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION DIRECTORS 1988 Ronald C. Wilson President R. Pete Lindsley Roger E. McClure Secretary Treasurer Sarah G. Bishop Norman L. Pace James Borden Melburn R. Park Ron Bridgemon John C. Tinsley R. Scott House Rich Wolfert Richard B. Zopf Highlights of 1988 As you read through this report, the vitality of the Foundation's research, education, and interpretation programs will be readily apparent. The CRF is extremely happy to have funded five karst fellowships in 1988 with grants totalling $6,500. The Foundation's long term projects in Kentucky, Missouri, New Mexico, and Califor­ nia continue to produce results of interest to speleologists as well as to the National Park Service and U. S. Forest Service managers. Of note are the completion of two Mammoth Cave tour trail maps and the publication of a booklet containing thirteen preliminary quadrangles which detail the latest map of Carlbad Cavern. This year saw the CRF enter into a cooperative venture ·with two speleological organizations within the People's Republic of China, the Institute of Karst Geology and the Speleological Society of South China Normal University, to exchange information and investigate caves in three southern provinces. The success of the China expedition should mean future expeditions to this country as well as other CRF sponsored foreign caving expeditions. Two new projects were started during 1988, one at Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas, and the other at Lava Beds National Monument, California. Operating agreements between the National Park Service and CRF were signed in February and November respectively. The Capitan reef within Texas has tremendous potential for large caves which to date have not been tapped. The use of the luxurious "Ship-on-the Desert" as a field facility within the Park should greatly enhance our efforts here. Lava Beds contains 112 named caves and many more may exist in the remoter areas ofthe Monument. Future efforts by the Foundation here will be inventory and monitoring of the cave resource to assist the National Park Service in their management and protection efforts. The CRF Board agreed to provide assistance to Arizona Conservation Projects, Inc. (ACPI), in their baseline environmental study of Kartchner Cavern, Arizona. This essentially pristine cave was purchased by the State ofArizona and will be developed as the state's newest state park. This represents the first time that a cave and its surroundings will be studied in detail prior to development. Three members of the ACPI board are CRF members. CRF's assistance will primarily be in the form of review of the draft reports prepared by ACPI's scientific team. Ronald Bridgeman CRF President 4 CONTENTS H.raruGH1'S OF 1988 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 4 SciENCE PRoGRAMS · ····· · ······ ········· ~ ··· · ····· ·· ···· · ············· · · ·· · · ··· · · · ······················ · ·················· · ·· · ·· · ·· · ······ ···· · ·· ····· ·· ·· ·· ··· · ···· · · · · · ······ · ···· · ·· ···· ··· · ······ ·· ····· ··········· ······ 7 _ 69 CARTOGRAPHY PRoGRAM·--------·--------·--------·--------·--------·--------·---------·--------·--------·--------·--------·----- 9 - 16 Lilbum Cave Cartography Report ................................................................................................................ ......... ......... 9 New Lilburn Instrumentation .............................................................................._ ... ........ ................... ............................. 9 :Highlights from the California Area ........................................................................ ............................................. .......... 9 Carlsbad Cavem National Park Survey and Cartography .. ............................................................. ........................... 1 0 Guadalupe Escarpment Area ...................................... : ..................... ............................. ."... ...................................... .. ... 13 Missouri Cave Survey and Inventory .. ....................................................................................... ....... .. ................ ....... .. 13 Cartographic Delineation of the Caves of Mammoth Cave National Park ............................ .. ..................... ....... ....... 14 Small Cave Resource Inventory ................................... .. .............. ...................................................... ........................... 16 GEOSCIENCE PROGRAM ·---····-···········---··-·------··-···-------·--------·--------·--····-··-··-·····---····-···-··-······-·-···········································17 - 38 Cartography, Tephrochronology and Sinkhole Deposits in the Karst of Redwood Canyon, Kings Canyon National Park, California ......................................... .................................................................... 17 Novel Subaqueous Speleothems in Lechuguilla Cave, New Mexico ............................................................. .............. 18 Water Chemistry in the Vicinity of Subaqueous Helictites in Pellucidar, Lechuguilla Cave, New Mexico ............. 20 Fluorite in Glori Cave, Guadalupe Mountains National Park ............................ ................ ................. ....................... 22 Calcified(?) Balloon Speleothems in Virgin (Blowing) Cave, Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico ..................... .. .. 22 Cross Cave, Apache Mountains, Culberson County, Texas ................ ............ .. ...................................................... .. ... 23 "Helictite Bushes" - A Subaqueous Speleothem? ............. .......... .. ....................................................................... ..... ... 24 Hydrology of the Sistema Huautla Karst Groundwater Basin, Oaxaca, Mexico .. ....... .......................... .................... 26 The Origin and Development of Brucker Breakdown and the Adjacent Area, Mammoth Cave System, KY .......... 27 Lithologic and Geomorphic Controls on Drainage Basin Morphology and Evolution, Crawford Upland, South-Central Indiana ........... .......................................... ... ......... ..................... ... .... ............................. .... ............. 28 The Potential Depth of Underwater Caves in the Orlando Area, Florida ........... .... .......... ......................................... 31 Hydrology of Wakulla Spring, Florida ................ .............. ..... .. ..................................................................................... 33 Groundwater Flow Pattems in Joint-Controlled Networks and Cave Development ................................................ 37 EcoLOGY PROGRAM ----··---·······-······-·····-········--·------··-·············--···--··--·····----··-····-·······-··············································································· 39- 65 Arthropod Species Diversity in the Big Room and the Environs ......... ....................... ............................. .. .. ............... 39 Aquatic Communities in Mammoth Cave .................................................................................. .. .. ............................
Recommended publications
  • Caving: Safety Activity Checkpoints
    Caving: Safety Activity Checkpoints Caving—also called “spelunking” (speh-LUNK-ing) is an exciting, hands-on way to learn about speleology (spee-lee-AH- luh-gee), the study of caves, in addition to paleontology (pay-lee-en-TAH-luh-gee), the study of life from past geologic periods by examining plant and animal fossils. As a sport, caving is similar to rock climbing, and often involves using ropes to crawl and climb through cavern nooks and crannies. These checkpoints do not apply to groups taking trips to tourist or commercial caves, which often include safety features such as paths, electric lights, and stairways. Girl Scout Daisies and Brownies do not participate in caving. Know where to go caving. Connect with your Girl Scout council for site suggestions. Also, the National Speleological Society provides an online search tool for U.S. caving clubs, and the National Park Service provides information about National Park caves. Include girls with disabilities. Communicate with girls with disabilities and/or their caregivers to assess any needs and accommodations. Learn more about the resources and information that the National Center on Accessibility and the National Center of Physical Activities and Disabilities provide to people with disabilities. Caving Gear Basic Gear Sturdy boots with ankle protection (hiking boots for dry areas; rubber boots or wellies for wet caves) Warm, rubber gloves (to keep hands warm and protect against cuts and abrasions) Nonperishable, high-energy foods such as fruits and nuts Water Specialized Gear
    [Show full text]
  • NCKRI: 2012-2013 Annual Report
    The National Cave and Karst Research Institute (NCKRI) will be the world’s premier cave and karst research organization. NCKRI promotes and performs projects of national and international application, of the highest quality and integrity, through dedicated staff and partners. NCKRI is a non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation. It was created by the US Congress in 1998 in partnership with the National Park Service, State of New Mexico, and the City of Carlsbad. Federal and state funding for NCKRI is adminis- tered by the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technolo- gy (aka New Mexico Tech or NMT). Funds not produced by agreements through NMT are accepted directly by NCKRI. NCKRI’s enabling legislation, the National Cave and Karst Research Institute Act of 1998, 16 U.S.C. §4310, iden- tifies NCKRI’s mission as to: 1) further the science of speleology; 2) centralize and standardize speleological information; 3) foster interdisciplinary cooperation in cave and karst research programs; 4) promote public education; 5) promote national and international cooperation in pro- tecting the environment for the benefit of cave and karst landforms; and 6) promote and develop environmentally sound and sus- tainable resource management practices. NCKRI produced this publication as part of its annual Our 2011-12 Annual Report cover showed a speleothem reporting of activities. The reporting period covers NCKRI’s reported as destroyed. It still exists; a similar nearby speleo- fiscal year, from 1 July to 30 June of the following year. them had been destroyed. For reasons like this, NCKRI ar- Digital copies of this and previous reports are available for chives cave photos as historical and scientific records.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Virginia's Karst
    Introduction to Virginia’s Karst A presentation of The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Karst Program & Project Underground Karst - A landscape developed in limestone, dolomite, marble, or other soluble rocks and characterized by subsurface drainage systems, sinking or losing streams, sinkholes, springs, and caves. Cross-section diagram by David Culver, American University. Karst topography covers much of the Valley and Ridge Province in the western third of the state. Aerial photo of karst landscape in Russell County. Smaller karst areas also occur in the Cumberland Plateau, Piedmont, and Coastal Plain provinces. At least 29 counties support karst terrane in western Virginia. In western Virginia, karst occurs along slopes and in valleys between mountain ridges. There are few surface streams in these limestone valleys as runoff from mountain slopes disappears into the subsurface upon contact with the karst bedrock. Water flows underground, emerging at springs on the valley floor. Thin soils over fractured, cavernous limestone allow precipitation to enter the subsurface directly and rapidly, with a minimal amount of natural filtration. The purer the limestone, the less soil develops on the bedrock, leaving bare pinnacles exposed at the ground surface. Rock pinnacles may also occur where land use practices result in massive soil loss. Precipitation mixing with carbon dioxide becomes acidic as it passes through soil. Through geologic time slightly acidic water dissolves and enlarges the bedrock fractures, forming caves and other voids in the bedrock. Water follows the path of least resistance, so it moves through voids in rock layers, fractures, and boundaries between soluble and insoluble bedrock.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentos Conceptuales Y Didácticos Iguzquiza2 1 Unidad Del IGME En Las Islas Baleares
    y El karst en cifras ¿cuáles son las mayores cavidades del mundo y por qué? Karst in figure: which are the major cavities of the world and why? Pedro Agustín Robledo Ardila1, Juan José Durán Valsero2 Y Eulogio Pardo Fundamentos Conceptuales Didácticos Iguzquiza2 1 Unidad del IGME en las Islas Baleares. C/Felicià Fuster 7, 07006, Palma de Mallorca, Baleares. E-mail: [email protected] 2 IGME. C/Ríos Rosas nº 23, 28003, Madrid. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Resumen Entre los terrenos kársticos superficiales y subterráneos, las cuevas son, actualmente para determinados colectivos, el producto más interesante del karst y, que de forma creciente, ha atraído la curiosidad humana desde que los seres humanos habitan el Planeta. Prueba de ello son los restos de arte rupestre y yacimientos paleontológicos descritos en muchas cuevas o el creciente número de visitantes anuales que tienen. Sin embargo, en las últimas décadas los equipos de científicos y espeleólogos se han ocupado especialmente del karst en términos de cifras, con especial énfasis en grandes cavidades. Bien, atendiendo al tamaño de las mismas en su desarrollo horizontal o vertical, o de forma parcial, midiendo volúmenes de galerías y conductos, cámaras o espeleotemas, entre otros elementos. Existen exhaustivos rankings de los sistemas de cavidades de mayor longitud total de galerías exploradas, de las salas más grandes, de las cuevas más profundadas o de los espeleotemas más grandes en su tipo. Esto ha condicionando que, por un lado, exista un auge en la investigación de los sistemas endokársticos más grandes del mundo, y por otro, que paisajes superficiales kársticos espectaculares del Planeta hayan pasado a un segundo orden en cuanto a el interés científico o turístico.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with Karst Booklet and Poster
    Publishing Partners AGI gratefully acknowledges the following organizations’ support for the Living with Karst booklet and poster. To order, contact AGI at www.agiweb.org or (703) 379-2480. National Speleological Society (with support from the National Speleological Foundation and the Richmond Area Speleological Society) American Cave Conservation Association (with support from the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation and a Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the Kentucky Division of Water) Illinois Basin Consortium (Illinois, Indiana and Kentucky State Geological Surveys) National Park Service U.S. Bureau of Land Management USDA Forest Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey AGI Environmental Awareness Series, 4 A Fragile Foundation George Veni Harvey DuChene With a Foreword by Nicholas C. Crawford Philip E. LaMoreaux Christopher G. Groves George N. Huppert Ernst H. Kastning Rick Olson Betty J. Wheeler American Geological Institute in cooperation with National Speleological Society and American Cave Conservation Association, Illinois Basin Consortium National Park Service, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, USDA Forest Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey ABOUT THE AUTHORS George Veni is a hydrogeologist and the owner of George Veni and Associates in San Antonio, TX. He has studied karst internationally for 25 years, serves as an adjunct professor at The University of Ernst H. Kastning is a professor of geology at Texas and Western Kentucky University, and chairs Radford University in Radford, VA. As a hydrogeolo- the Texas Speleological Survey and the National gist and geomorphologist, he has been actively Speleological Society’s Section of Cave Geology studying karst processes and cavern development for and Geography over 30 years in geographically diverse settings with an emphasis on structural control of groundwater Harvey R.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Cover 2011 Spread 8/10/11 11:28 AM Page 1
    Annual Report Cover 2011_Spread 8/10/11 11:28 AM Page 1 National Cave and Karst Research Institute 2010-2011 400-1 Cascades Avenue Carlsbad, New Mexico 88220-6215, USA ANNUAL REPORT www.nckri.org www.nckri.org The National Cave and Karst Research Institute (NCKRI) will be the world’s premier cave and karst research organization, facilitating and conducting programs in re- search, education, data management, and stewardship in all fields of speleology through its own efforts and by establish- ing an international consortium of partners whose individual efforts will be supported to promote cooperation, synergy, flexibility, and creativity. NCKRI was created by the U.S. Congress in 1998 in partnership with the State of New Mexico and the City of Carlsbad. Initially an institute within the National Park Ser- vice, NCKRI is now a non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation that retains its federal, state, and city partnerships. Federal and state funding for NCKRI is administered by the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (aka New Mexico Tech or NMT). Funds not produced by agreements through NMT are accepted directly by NCKRI. NCKRI’s enabling legislation, the National Cave and Karst Research Institute Act of 1998, 16 U.S.C. §4310, iden- tifies NCKRI’s mission as to: 1) further the science of speleology; 2) centralize and standardize speleological information; 3) foster interdisciplinary cooperation in cave and karst research programs; 4) promote public education; 5) promote national and international cooperation in pro- tecting the environment for the benefit of cave and karst landforms; and 6) promote and develop environmentally sound and sus- tainable resource management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Research Foundation (CRF) Is a 501(C)(3) Organization Founded in Kentucky in 1957 for the Purpose of Facilitating Cave Research
    CAVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION Ozarks Operation Area by Scott House The Cave Research Foundation (CRF) is a 501(c)(3) organization founded in Kentucky in 1957 for the purpose of facilitating cave research. Today it continues its mission with operations across the country and in expeditions around the world. The CRF is administered by officers, a board and an operations council. An operations manager is appointed by the CRF board to coordinate and oversee activities within an operation. Other individuals within the operation may head specific projects or act as functionaries of one sort or another. Following is a brief description of various CRF Ozarks Operation projects. Mark Twain National Forest: CRF works with Mark Twain National Forest (USFS) through a series of cooperative agreements and modifications. These cooperative agreements superseded challenge cost-share agreements and volunteer agreements. Cave Mapping and Biological Inventory: This has been our largest and longest running project. It originated in 1990 with a management concern centered on an application by the Doe Run Company for mineral prospecting within the Eleven Point and Current River watersheds. The aim was to document all caves within the 250 square kilometer mineral lease area by detailed mapping, biological inventory and comprehensive descriptions. More than 120 caves were visited and documented over the 6 year course of the study. Following on from that initial phase, MTNF has continued to provide funding, through one vehicle or another, for an expanded project which is gradually documenting caves throughout the Mark Twain National Forest. Approximately 450 caves have been documented during this ongoing study.
    [Show full text]
  • Bats, White-Nose Syndrome, and Federal Cave and Mine Closures
    BATS, WHITE-NOSE SYNDROME, AND FEDERAL CAVE AND MINE CLOSURES A report by the Center for Biological Diversity January 26, 2011 Cover photo: Little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) in a New York cave, displaying characteristic fuzz of white-nose syndrome on nose and wings. Credit: Al Hicks, New York Dept. of Environmental Conservation For more information about this report, contact: Mollie Matteson, Conservation Advocate Center for Biological Diversity, Northeast Field Office PO Box 188 Richmond, Vermont 05477 802-434-2388 [email protected] Center for Biological Diversity, Federal Cave Closures 2 Bats, White-nose Syndrome, and Federal Cave and Mine Closures Delay is the deadliest form of denial. ~~C. Northcote Parkinson, British historian, 1909-1993 Executive Summary In the span of just four winters, a deadly new disease called white-nose syndrome (WNS) that devastates bat populations has spread rapidly across the country from east to west. The bat illness was first documented in a cave in upstate New York in 2006, and as of spring 2010, the white- nose pathogen had been reported as far west as western Oklahoma (see Figure 1). In affected bat colonies, mortality rates have reached as high as 100 percent, virtually emptying caves once harboring tens of thousands of bats and leaving cave floors littered with the innumerable small bones of the dead. At least six bat species are known to be susceptible, and the fungus associated with the disease has been found on another three species. Two federally listed endangered bat species are among those affected thus far. Scientists and conservationists are gravely concerned that if current trends continue, one or more bat species could become extinct in the next couple of decades or sooner.
    [Show full text]
  • Lascaux Cave, France  Complex Hunter Gatherers at the End of the Paleolithic  Dates: 47/45,000 – 20/18,000 B.P
    Lascaux Cave, France Complex Hunter Gatherers at the End of the Paleolithic Dates: 47/45,000 – 20/18,000 b.p. (Epipaleolithic=20/18,000-10,000 bp) Industries include microliths and bone tools—not found in previous periods Raw materials were exchanged over long distances in this period Wide range of materials, other than flint, come into use: bone tools, stone vessels, ochre, shells Some probably for ritual purposes In contrast to early modern humans (and Neanderthals): Size of teeth reduced Size of jaw reduced Muscularity diminishes Less skeletal trauma Increased longevity Cro-Magnon cranium Upper Paleolithic Artwork Cave Art Includes spectacular images of animals and abstract forms and, rarely, humans Mobiliary Art These portable art objects include Venus figurines Body Ornamentation: Pierced shells, pierced animal teeth, and bone beads were most likely work as necklaces or attached to clothing Horse, Cosquer Cave, France Penquin or Auk, Cosquer Cave, France Bear Bison ‘Venus’ figurines Dolni Vestonice Lespugue Willendorf . Appear around 25,000 bp, Europe . Carved in ivory, wood, stone, modeled in clay . Breasts, hips, buttocks, thighs, usually large . Head, arms, hands, legs & feet are only schematic . Some are pregnant, others are not 4.48.jpg Dwellings Huts with bone frameworks Floors with inlaid stone Stone-lined pits for hearths Tailored clothing Long-distance trade Blade technique Long, parallel-sided flakes are struck off the edges of a specially prepared core Blades: long flake, twice as punch long as wide • Sharp parallel edges • Removed from core like peeling carrot (sort of) • Blades provide “blank” or form, which may then be shaped into different tools: .
    [Show full text]
  • Plains Anthropologist Author Index
    Author Index AUTHOR INDEX Aaberg, Stephen A. (see Shelley, Phillip H. and George A. Agogino) 1983 Plant Gathering as a Settlement Determinant at the Pilgrim Stone Circle Site. In: Memoir 19. Vol. 28, No. (see Smith, Calvin, John Runyon, and George A. Agogino) 102, pp. 279-303. (see Smith, Shirley and George A. Agogino) Abbott, James T. Agogino, George A. and Al Parrish 1988 A Re-Evaluation of Boulderflow as a Relative Dating 1971 The Fowler-Parrish Site: A Folsom Campsite in Eastern Technique for Surficial Boulder Features. Vol. 33, No. Colorado. Vol. 16, No. 52, pp. 111-114. 119, pp. 113-118. Agogino, George A. and Eugene Galloway Abbott, Jane P. 1963 Osteology of the Four Bear Burials. Vol. 8, No. 19, pp. (see Martin, James E., Robert A. Alex, Lynn M. Alex, Jane P. 57-60. Abbott, Rachel C. Benton, and Louise F. Miller) 1965 The Sister’s Hill Site: A Hell Gap Site in North-Central Adams, Gary Wyoming. Vol. 10, No. 29, pp. 190-195. 1983 Tipi Rings at York Factory: An Archaeological- Ethnographic Interface. In: Memoir 19. Vol. 28, No. Agogino, George A. and Sally K. Sachs 102, pp. 7-15. 1960 Criticism of the Museum Orientation of Existing Antiquity Laws. Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 31-35. Adovasio, James M. (see Frison, George C., James M. Adovasio, and Ronald C. Agogino, George A. and William Sweetland Carlisle) 1985 The Stolle Mammoth: A Possible Clovis Kill-Site. Vol. 30, No. 107, pp. 73-76. Adovasio, James M., R. L. Andrews, and C. S. Fowler 1982 Some Observations on the Putative Fremont Agogino, George A., David K.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College Version June 20, 2012
    1 Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College version June 20, 2012 Introduction I began accumulating this bibliography around 1996, making notes for my own uses. Since I have access to some obscure articles, I thought it might be useful to put this information where others can get at it. Comments in brackets [ ] are my own comments, opinions, and critiques, and not everyone will agree with them. The thoroughness of the annotation varies depending on when I read the piece and what my interests were at the time. The many articles from atlatl newsletters describing contests and scores are not included. I try to find news media mentions of atlatls, but many have little useful info. There are a few peripheral items, relating to topics like the dating of the introduction of the bow, archery, primitive hunting, projectile points, and skeletal anatomy. Through the kindness of Lorenz Bruchert and Bill Tate, in 2008 I inherited the articles accumulated for Bruchert’s extensive atlatl bibliography (Bruchert 2000), and have been incorporating those I did not have in mine. Many previously hard to get articles are now available on the web - see for instance postings on the Atlatl Forum at the Paleoplanet webpage http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/forums/26/t/WAA-Links-References.html and on the World Atlatl Association pages at http://www.worldatlatl.org/ If I know about it, I will sometimes indicate such an electronic source as well as the original citation. The articles use a variety of measurements. Some useful conversions: 1”=2.54
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Bacteria in the Growth of Cave Pearls
    13th International Congress of Speleology 4th Speleological Congress of Latin América and Caribbean 26th Brazilian Congress of Speleology Brasília DF, 15-22 de julho de 2001 Role of Bacteria in the Growth of Cave Pearls Michal GRADZIÒSKI Institute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Oleandry 2a, 30-063 KrakÛw, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The growth of micritic cave pearls have been studied based on ones collected in Perlova Cave (Slovakia). The pearls display rough surfaces and irregular internal lamination. Several living bacteria have been detected inside the biofilm which covered still growing cave pearls. These bacteria produce organic matter from inorganic, gaseous CO2 dissolved in water and hence cause oversaturation with respect to calcite within the bacterial surroundings. Thus calcite precipitation is due to the bacterial metabolism. SEM investigations indicate that the precipitation proceeds upon the surfaces of the bacterial cells. This process results in mineral replicas of bacterial cells and finally causes almost complete obliteration of primary microbial structures The bacteria uptake preferentially 16O and cause relative enrichment of heavier isotope (18O) in the bacterial surroundings and in precipitating calcite. Introduction Cave pearls, known also as cave pisoids, have been reported in literature for a long time (HILL & FORTI, 1997). This group of speleothems includes a broad spectrum of grains varying in shape and internal structure. Best known are the forms with smooth, lustrous surface and regular concentric lamination. The smooth and shining outer surface of these pisoids is related to abrasion on contacts with neighbouring grains and substrate (BAKER & FROSTICK, 1947). Additional recognised prerequisites for their growth include the presence of suitable nuclei for the grain growth, supersaturated state of the solution from which the grains crystallise, and constant, balanced supply of water to the environment of their growth (GRADZI—SKI & RADOMSKI, 1967; DONAHUE, 1969).
    [Show full text]