Hitcham and Taplow Society Newsletter Spring 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hitcham and Taplow Society Newsletter Spring 2019 Hitcham and Taplow Society Newsletter 111: Spring 2019 £3.50 to non­members www.taplowsociety.org.uk Hitcham and Taplow Society Formed in 1959 to protect Hitcham, Taplow and the surrounding countryside from being spoilt by bad development and neglect. President: Eva Lipman Vice President: Fred Russell Chairman: Vacant Treasurer: Robert Hanbury Secretary: Roger Worthington Committee: Andrew Findlay, Charlie Greeves, Robert Harrap, Rupert Sellers, Nigel Smales, Jonathan Specktor, Louise Symons, Jacqueline Turner Newsletter Editor (and photos and maps unless noted): Nigel Smales Newsletter Production: Andrew Findlay Contact Address: HTS, Littlemere, River Road, Taplow, SL6 0BB [email protected] 07787 556309 Cover picture: Taplow between the rivers. (James Camplin). See Page 7. Editorial Grateful thanks to the many readers who kindly principle which depends upon councillors and expressed appreciation of last November's planning officers having the time, expertise and Newsletter 110, which paid tribute to our local knowledge to make decisions for the benefit antecedents who fell in the Great War. As of their communities. Page 3 wonders how well promised, the Society continues to explore how this cunning plan is working locally. Pages 4 & 5 Taplovians who fell in World War Two can be review the degree to which the 2013 vision for Mill better commemorated. Watch this space. Lane has lost its way. Pages 6 to 9 examine risks to It is remarkable how much our little corner of the Green Belts nationwide, around London and in world is threatened by ambition, lack of attention or Taplow's lowlands. Pages 10 & 11 conclude this incompetence. Consequently, this Newsletter adventure with glances at looming organisational returns to the primary aim of the Society – to protect and infrastructural plans. our patch from being spoilt – and focuses on Later pages celebrate our community and those Planning (with a capital P) and other plans and past and present who make it special. Our aspirations which affect us. Information and challenge is to follow valiantly in their footsteps. observations are current as at 25th April. Finally, thanks to friends in Hedgerley The Town & Country Planning Act (1947) Historical Society and Facebook's Maidenhead required local authorities to comprehensively plan Memories – indicated (MM) – who have shared and control development within their domains, a various images and cuttings. Acronyms Berkeley Homes (BH), Buckinghamshire County Council (BCC), Campaign for the Protection of Rural England (CPRE), County Council (CC), Department for Transport (DfT), District Council (DC), Great Western Railway (GWR), Her Majesty's Government (HMG), London Green Belt Council (LGBC), National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), Office for National Statistics (OfNS), Parish Council (PC), Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead (RBWM), South Bucks DC (SBDC), Supplementary Planning Document (SPD), Taplow Parish Council (TPC), The Buckinghamshire Council (TBC) and Transport for London (TfL). Spring 2019 Page 2 Hitcham and Taplow Society Plans Local and Neighbourly The value of Taplow's two Conservation Areas – the In contrast, an application by Bristol City Council Village (1975) and the Riverside (1999), both for 1,500 homes was refused by its own councillors affirmed by Character Appraisals (2007) – has ebbed for not complying with its NP approved two weeks away amid legislative turbulence at national and before. Heartened that NPs can have teeth, Jamie district levels. Some think the combination of the Barnard, Martin Maund, Spencer Norton, George Localism Act (2011), which extended the power of Sandy, Nigel Smales and Roger Worthington local councils (and their officers), and the NPPF recently resumed planning for the Plan. Aspects (2012, revised 2018), which deregulated policies and under consideration include its overall framework, streamlined procedures to encourage development, the need for professional expertise, the impact of the has reduced effective public oversight. The revised NPPF on current protections, the possible relevance of the Taplow Parish Plan (2005) has removal from the Green Belt of the between­the­ diminished as SBDC's Local Plan (1999, revised rivers triangle (see Page 7) and the creation of a 2007) was replaced by its Core Strategy (2011) which supplementary Heritage Asset List to recognise and will be superseded by a joint SBDC / Chiltern DC improve protection of buildings, places, landscapes Local Plan (first draft 2017). and anything else we value. Hoping to exert greater influence, TPC secured Meanwhile, TPC and the Society agree the theme permission to prepare a supplementary for the restoration of Berry Hill Farm gravel quarry Neighbourhood Plan (NP) but paused pending must be "natural rural charm", with hay meadows delays to this latest Local Plan which even now preferable to any commercial development. has only "an unofficial and indicative timetable". Suggestions to Summerleaze include woodlands It might soon be released for consultation. Maybe and wetlands for wildlife and insects, bird­watching not. It might be approved by HMG and adopted hides, bridle paths, a challenging adventure in Summer 2020. Maybe not. It might it be playground, another for youngsters with den­ accepted by TBC if this new unitary authority building, woodcraft and other nature pursuits, two takes command (see Page 10). Maybe not. Such public footpaths – one recreating the ancient way doubts are fuelled by news that Bray abandoned south past Old Priory Garden down to the station, its NP after RBWM struck out just about the other from there to lower Berry Hill (avoiding everything in it, and a Cambridge council refused main roads) – and the revival of the Taplow Horse to adopt its local plan because HMG changes Show. In the spirit that it is up to locals to make the rendered it unrecognisable. best of our locality, have you any other suggestions? Proposals Pending SBDC is still considering planning applications micro­brewery in Ye Meads, a barn for quail for a riverside pub and new houses on Mill Lane rearing at Challen's Chick Farm (Marsh Lane), a (see Pages 4 & 5). Other outstanding applications 20m telecommunication pole at Miller & Carter include a new spa and conservatory at Taplow (Bath Road), a 2.4m wire boundary fence around House Hotel, replacements for Lamont House Cedar Cottage (Heathfield Road) and lifting (River Road) and Stonecrop (3 Saxon Gardens), a occupancy restrictions on Cliveden Stud House. t u ­ o y d y r a e r l k a d r u n i o F Q w t w w s e o r l o d p m n l a A T a Riverside Revival Taplow's riverside from Bond's blight descended, dreamers on headquarters) and a prospective Boatyard to the Papermill was both riverbanks yearned for a Hall & Woodhouse gastro­pub. once a mix of places to work, rest revival of our greatest shared And there will be yet more cars and play but, with their criticisms asset: Old Father Thames. Recent when Dunloe Lodge is rebuilt of proposals for a new pub and Newsletters have rued how the with nine apartments, not as more houses on Mill Lane, vague but welcome vision of the originally­approved replica Historic England and SBDC's SBDC's SPD – essentially, a brief family home. The pub would Conservation Officer are guilty of for prospective developers to be welcome – not least because historical revisionism. This was which BH's original 2015 design its garden, toilets and no "idyllic semi­rural waterside responded – has ebbed away defibrillator will be accessible location" for artisans. It was the as Planning acquiesced to to the public – yet despite the industrial rump of Taplow. The fragmentary creep by history here of unsightly gasworks liquified coal – an considering each subsequent gasometers, the Conservation extremely dirty, smelly business application myopically rather Officer exceeds both brief and for 120 years – and later the mill than in the context of a publicly context to challenge its massing recycled stuff much more agreed plan. The flux still hasn't and elevation. hazardous than wastepaper. As finally settled but elements are The re­designation of the slipping into sharper focus. Boathouses site as 'Residential' The Society is disappointed resulted in outline approval for with the increased number of a 'permitted development' new and proposed dwellings, squeezing 18 tiny dwellings up 9% from 211 to 229, and into its existing buildings. This dismayed at the vast area of car impractical scheme was parking that could cram the superseded by another for 13 riverbank, up 70% from 86 spaces dwellings and now by a Gage to 146 to serve Roux at Skindles, Properties proposal to replace Driftwood Cottage the new office block (a local BH the existing buildings with Spring 2019 Page 4 Hitcham and Taplow Society practical or visual link to prioritise a viable and vibrant Driftwood Cottage, its former future for our riverbank over lodge and stables, its illogical the conservation of outdated selectivity here will effectively elements of its past. blight the site. The other uncertainties relate The Old Boathouse was built to the future of 'the working over 120 years ago as a timber river'. SBDC is silent about its site shed to house boats, converted in and former Bond's Boathouse by the late 1940s to build speedboats Maidenhead Bridge where and again as offices in the 1980s. Marlow Boat Services plies Trigger's broom in Only Fools and riparian repair. Gage intends to Horses springs to mind – 17 maintain and enhance the replacement heads, 14 different moorings but its scheme may handles – except, unlike the have insufficient parking and broom, the Boathouse isn't as could the pub's proposed name – good as new. It probably never 'Taplow Boatyard' – be slightly was structurally capable of ironic since the latest sketch conversion to a high­quality shows BH's boatyard next door residence and certainly isn't now. half the size it was and without a Driftwood looks lonely, its nine­ chandlery, perhaps calling into inch brick walls the worse for question its commercial viability? years of heavy lorries thundering Yet with a little imagination, this past within reach.
Recommended publications
  • The Fabians Could Only Have Happened in Britain....In a Thoroughly Admirable Study the Mackenzies Have Captured the Vitality of the Early Years
    THE famous circle of enthusiasts, reformers, brilliant eccentrics-Sha\y the Webbs, Wells-whose ideas and unconventional attitudes fashioned our modern world by Norman C&Jeanne MacKenzie AUTHORS OF H.G. Wells: A Biography PRAISE FOR Not quite a political party, not quite a pressure group, not quite a debating society, the Fabians could only have happened in Britain....In a thoroughly admirable study the MacKenzies have captured the vitality of the early years. Since much of this is anecdotal, it is immensely fun to read. Most im¬ portant, they have pinpointed (with¬ out belaboring) all the internal para¬ doxes of F abianism. —The Kirkus Reviews H. G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, Bertrand Russell, part of the outstandingly talented and paradoxical group that led the way to socialist Britain, are brought into brilliant human focus in this marvelously detailed and anecdote-filled por¬ trait of the original members of the Fabian Society—with a fresh assessment of their contributions to social thought. “The first Fabians,” said Shaw, were “missionaries among the savages,” who laid the ground¬ work for the Labour Party, and whose mis¬ sionary zeal and passionate enthusiasms carried them from obscurity to fame. This voluble and volatile band of middle-class in¬ tellectuals grew up in a period of liberating ideas and changing morals, influenced by (continued on back flap) c A / c~ 335*1 MacKenzie* Norman Ian* Ml99f The Fabians / Norman and Jeanne MacKenzie* - New York : Simon and Schuster, cl977* — 446 p** [8] leaves of plates : ill* - ; 24 cm* Includes bibliographical references and index* ISBN 0—671—22347—X : $11.95 1* Fabian Society, London* I* Title.
    [Show full text]
  • Taplow Village Conservation Area
    South Bucks District Council Taplow Conservation Area Character Appraisal June 2007 Taplow Conservation Area CONTENTS Page Map of the conservation area 1 Chapter 1 – Introduction 2 Chapter 2 – Planning policy context 3 Chapter 3 – Location and setting 4 Chapter 4 – Origins, development and uses 5 Views map 9 Chapter 5 – Landscape and views 10 Chapter 6 – Streetscape and spaces 12 Chapter 7 – Buildings 15 Chapter 8 – Neutral/ negative features & enhancement opportunities 23 Sources & Acknowledgements 26 Appendices Map of listed and significant unlisted buildings A Designations: • Table of listed buildings B • Scheduled ancient monuments D • Historic parks and gardens D Table of significant unlisted buildings E Tree and hedge map G Map of historic walls H Historic Walls I Guidance for Residents L Historic maps N Consultation on this document P Contents Produced from the Ordnance Survey Digital Mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to Taplow Conservation Area prosecution or civil proceedings. South Bucks District Council LA100025874 2005 Taplow Conservation Area CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION The Taplow Conservation Area was originally designated by Beaconsfield District Council on 25th June 1975. As part of its programme to review all its conservation areas South Bucks District Council formulated proposals for amendments to the boundaries of the Taplow Conservation Area, having taken into account changes within the area and recent archaeological investigations as well as current legislation and guidance on conservation areas. Local residents were consulted on these proposals and invited to submit their comments by way of a questionnaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorney Parish News
    Dorney Parish NewV )HEUXDU\ 1 Providing Care, Comfort and Companionship in Burnham. Join us for “Tea for Two” on Tuesdays! Bring a friend to enjoy tea, freshly baked cakes, our newly decorated dining room and beautiful landscaped surroundings. We look forward to welcoming you, every second Tuesday of the month, at 2:30pm. Find us: Parliament Lane, Burnham, Slough, SL1 8NU Call us to find out more: on 01628 667345 Email: [email protected] 2 ISSUE NO. 1/19 FEBRUARY 2019 EDITORIAL As we enter a New Year, we are in the midst of a political crisis. A right wing group seeks to rise roughshod over relationships that have endured for decades. Many citizens would like to return to how it was in the 1960s. Others feel what they were promised in the 1970s is different to how things have turned out. Meanwhile, remainers are striving to find any legal means to prevent what the government intends. Yes, we have to face it – the plans for a Unitary Council in Buckinghamshire are not going well. As the erstwhile Bucks district councils plan legal action against the Secretary of State’s scheme, one wonders again just why our County Councillor is so, to use his phrase, ‘delighted’, at Mr Brokenshire’s decision. Some call for a ‘Buxit’ with us re-locating in the Royal Borough and I recommend Virginia Silvester’s article in this issue on the evolution of Bucks’ borders to get an idea of how Dorney came to be poised on the edge of two counties. Anybody reading the Parish Council minutes in this issue will see how our representatives believe that decisions over liaison with the M4 Project are being taken far to the north of Dorney.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, ?Th August 1987
    10082 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH AUGUST 1987 as part of the Conservation Area is Church Circle, the area of which Colnbrook: The rest of the area of open space at Crown Meadow, is bounded by the rear of the curtilages of those properties on the formerly part of the hostel site and now open Green Belt land and outside of the Circle. the area to the north and east of the church, including the old (818) Vicarage which is rural in character and by virtue of its Green Belt designation intended to remain so. See Map J. II. Land to be removed from the Area of Special Control of SOUTH BUCKS DISTRICT COUNCIL Advertisements TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 Beaconsfield: Areas at Holtspur, Copperfields, Ledborough Wood, Lakes Lane/Malthouse Square and between Burkes Town toid Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations Road/Grove Road and the Oxford Road. These areas share similar 1984 characteristics to the other built-up residential parts of the town and should be treated similarly for the purpose of advertisement Notice is hereby given that the South Bucks District Council in control. See Map A. exercise of its powers under Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1984, has Burnham: Areas in the vicinity of the Bishop Centre, the built-up submitted for the approval of the Secretary of State for the area south of the Bath Road, Lent Green/Gore Road, Wymers Environment an Order modifying the Bucks County Council Wood Road/Poyle Lane, Hogfair Lane/Green Lane/The Fairway Control of Advertisements (Area of Special Control) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedgerley Parish Council Comments on SBDC Ward Boundaries Consultation
    Hedgerley Parish Council Comments on SBDC Ward Boundaries Consultation Hedgerley Parish Council (HPC) is opposed to any change to the District Ward boundaries which would result in there being more than one District Councillor representing the Civil Parish of Hedgerley. This is because the single point of focus for District representation that exists now, and that works so well in the practical administration of Hedgerley, would be lost. We know that having one District Councillor to one or many parish Councils is effective. (The present District Councillor attends HPC and also Fulmer Parish Council meetings.) HPC appreciates that having many District Councillors to one Parish Council could be appropriate for large parishes. However HPC does not see how having many District Councillors to many Parish Councils could work at a practical level. Which of the District Councillors would attend HPC meetings? Would all of them attend? Perhaps there would be a rota, but how would there be continuity in addressing the issues pertinent to Hedgerley? In terms of alignment with other communities: According to the SBDC ward profile: the Hedgerley & Fulmer ward has a population of 1525, is made up of 12 hectares of buildings (0.9% of ward area) and 1112 hectares of green‐space (91% of ward area). In contrast the Farnham Royal ward has a population of 5218, is 24 hectares of buildings (6% of ward area) and just 197 hectares of green‐ space (49% of ward area). In summary, Hedgerley could be considered to be rural whereas Farnham Royal is largely residential. This difference in ward profile is further highlighted in the population density figures of 12.44 persons per hectare versus 1.12 persons per hectare for Hedgerley.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampden Hill
    DRAFT Conservation Area Character Appraisal Taplow Designated 1975 & 2006 Conservation areas were introduced through the Civic Amenities Act 1967 and are “areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character and appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance” (Section 69 (1)(a) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. This document identifies, describes and illustrates the features and characteristics that justify designation of Taplow as a Conservation Area. Any alterations or extensions to buildings within or adjacent to the Conservation Area are constrained by the need to respect the special characteristics identified in this document and in the Council’s local policies. 1 E u r o C o n s t B d D y e f M i l l R 65.5m a Pla yin g F ield c e 64.6m S S y d Taplow B t s n o k C c a o r r u T E Text anno S S e c a R l l 64.6m i M Listed Buildings 63.1m D A O R N h t E a D Existing Conservation Area E P V I L C De f H I L L F A Glen Island PropR osed Conservation Area M R O A D Produced from the Ordnance Survey Digital Mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Crown Copyright. N Pum ping Station Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedin6g1.6ms. El Sub Sta 64.6m South Bucks District Council LA100025874 2005 Root Ho 63.6m Allo tm en t G ar de ns E L AN M e A TCH c HI Hi t ch am L odg e a R 65.2m l l 63.6m Un d i M Tr ac k ot t age l y C Ho l GP 60.5m H i l l F a S C 2 rm h S 6 u C r c o h t m t C a 9 g o 4 4 t e .
    [Show full text]
  • Taplow History for TPC Website / Nigel Smales (10 February 2014)
    Taplow History for TPC Website / Nigel Smales (10 February 2014) Taplow is here because it is high. The story started some 10,000 years ago when Stone Age wanderers arrived on the southerly spur of the Chilterns to discover the perfect place for a settlement – a defensible hill complete with a freshwater pool mystical for being where none should be. They began one of the oldest settlements in England, possibly the oldest in Buckinghamshire. Their Bronze Age and Iron Age successors fortified the hilltop overlooking the River Thames, for centuries a frontier fought for by Saxons, Angles and Danes, eventually the natural boundary between Buckinghamshire and Berkshire. Sometime around 620, a burial mound was piled high in the south-west corner of the hill fort. There is no historical record of any Saxon, Angle or Viking lord called Tæppa but excavations in 1883 indicated that whoever was laid here was pagan and important, possibly a king or a prince stationed here to defend the frontier. His treasures are in the British Museum, still the third- richest find from England’s Dark Ages. The mystical pool is nearby. Legend has it that St Birinus, Bishop of Dorchester (Oxfordshire), came in about 635 to embrace Taplow’s ancient pagan pomp and circumstance by adopting this as a holy place for Christian baptism. It has long been known as Bapsey Pond. The original St Nicholas’ Church was built by the Mound in the late-7th Century, replaced after 600 years, relocated to its current site in 1828 and substantially rebuilt in 1912 to incorporate the chancel of 1865.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No 18 Spring 2004 Hertfordshire Record Society Chairman: a Ruston Secretary: H Falvey (Mrs) Treasurer: G Grimwood (Mrs)
    Newsletter No 18 Spring 2004 Hertfordshire Record Society Chairman: A Ruston Secretary: H Falvey (Mrs) Treasurer: G Grimwood (Mrs) Chairman's Report leaflets. These are being distributed as widely as possible to create and sustain interest in our Towards the end of 2003 members received a Society. Please let any of the officers know if you reproduction in four sheets of Bryant's Map of would like some copies for personal distribution. Hertfordshire, first published in 1822. This was our first venture into map production and it has been Alan Ruston perhaps our greatest public success. The map was featured, often at length, in most of the newspapers published in the county. Sue Flood our editor was Volume XX interviewed about it on Three Counties Julian Grenfell letters, c 1892 - 1915 Radio. Orders from non-members flooded in and several members bought a second copy. Our first Our twentieth volume is edited by Dr Kate print run of 500 was soon Thompson, former County Archivist of Hertfordshire exhausted, and another 500 was quickly ordered from the printer; this is also selling well. There have Members will no doubt remember the fund-raising been bulk orders, for example HALS has campaign in 1993-1995 to save the Panshanger recently one for 23 copies. In addition the interest Archive for Hertfordshire. It is arguably the most created has prompted new members to join, and in important estate collection in the care of HALS, and the months since the map appeared has seen a its loss would have been irreparable. Among the significant rise in our membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Rose Cottage, 14 Hedgerley Lane, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire
    Rose Cottage, 14 Hedgerley Lane, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire Rose Cottage The kitchen features an impressive range of attractive and bespoke base and wall unit 14 Hedgerley Lane, designs, an assortment of modern integrated Gerrards Cross, appliances, a large butler sink and a central island/breakfast bar, while there is ample space Buckinghamshire, for family dining with scenic views over the pretty garden. The property also benefits from a SL9 7NS useful utility space with additional sink, a guest An exquisite three-bedroom semi- cloakroom, and a bright office, ideal for a work from home setup. detached character home with a pretty garden and situated in a highly desired To the first floor is the sizeable principal Buckinghamshire location. bedroom suite, complete with a luxuriously sized and elegant en suite bathroom, a Juliet Gerrards Cross mainline station 0.9 miles balcony with views of the sunny garden and a (London Marylebone 23 mins), Denham 3.4 dressing area with built-in storage solutions. The miles, M40 (Junction 1) 4.1 miles, Beaconsfield second bedroom is a generous double with a 4.5 miles, High Wycombe 9.8 miles, Harrow 13.6 feature fireplace. There is a further bedroom and miles, Heathrow International Airport 13.5 miles, a second study also with fireplace, which could Central London 22.1 miles alternatively be utilised as a fourth bedroom if desired. The modern family shower room Reception hall | Sitting room | Office | Living completes the upstairs accommodation. area | Kitchen | Breakfast area | Utility Cloakroom | Principal bedroom with en suite Outside bathroom and dressing area | 2 Further The property has an enclosed paved driveway bedrooms | Family shower room | Summer edged with in-keeping red brick walls, hedging house | Gardens | Driveway | EPC Rating D and trees, with plenty of room to park several vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • South Bucks and Chiltern Open Space Study
    SOUTH BUCKS AND CHILTERN DISTRICT COUNCILS: JOINT OPEN SPACE STUDY FINAL REPORT ANNEXES Joint Open Space Study: Annexes ANNEX A: OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES TYPOLOGY / QUALITY STANDARD NATIONAL SOURCE NOTES DEFINITION QUANTITY STANDARD Parks and Welcoming clean, well maintained area with hard/soft 0.8 ha/1,000 Fields in National standard adopted Gardens landscaping population Trust A one stop community facility, accessible to all with a 710 m walking Fields in National standard adopted range of leisure, recreational and play opportunities Trust Safe to visit, pleasant to walk and sit in Cut back trees and bushes for safety and clear sight- lines Include paved and planted areas, paths, grassed areas, seating, clear pathways, appropriate lighting and signage to, and within, the site Include ramps instead of steps and wide paths for wheelchair and pushchair users May provide opportunities for public realm art Should link to surrounding green space. Clean and well maintained green space, with appropriate ancillary furniture pathways, and natural landscaping Safe site with spacious outlook Enhance the environment/ could become a community focus Large spaces may afford opportunities for informal play. Smaller landscaped areas in and around housing areas 3 Joint Open Space Study: Annexes TYPOLOGY / QUALITY STANDARD NATIONAL SOURCE NOTES DEFINITION QUANTITY STANDARD Informal recreation Provide connections for wildlife and people movement Include, and often connect to, green lungs Contribute to biodiversity Amenity Planted using native species 0.6 ha/1,000 Fields in National standard adopted greenspace population Trust e.g. Village Areas to be maintained clear of dog fouling and litter Greens 480 m walking Fields in National standard adopted Provision of seating and bins Trust May provide opportunities for public realm art May include woodland.
    [Show full text]
  • Renovated 3 Bedroom Period Cottage with Garden
    RENO VATED 3 BEDROOM PERIOD COTTAGE WITH GARDEN CASUALTY COTTAGES KILN LANE, HEDGERLEY, SL2 3UT Unfurnished, £1,400 pcm + £285 inc VAT tenancy paperwork fee and other charges apply.* Available Now RENOV ATED 3 BEDROOM PERIOD COTTAGE WITH GARDEN AND TWO ALLOCATED PARKING SPACES CASUALTY COTTAGES KILN LANE, HEDGERLEY, SL2 3UT £1,400 pcm - Unfurnished • 3 Bedrooms • 2 Reception Rooms • 1 Bathroom • Recently Renovated • Period Cottage • Garden • Two Allocated Parking Spaces • EPC Rating = D • Council Tax = E Situation This recently renovated period cottage is located in the pretty village of Hedgerley, a small picturesque village with a pub in a small valley on a winding country lane which links Farnham Common with Gerrards Cross. Surrounded by rolling countryside, yet conveniently placed for transport links. Farnham Common is ideally situated for both commuting and family life, being close to the M40 motorway with subsequent link to the M25 and the M4. Main line rail services are close at hand from Slough (to Paddington), Gerrards Cross and Beaconsfield (to Marylebone). Farnham Common village has a good range of shops and services with Windsor, Beaconsfield and Uxbridge all within easy driving distance, providing a more comprehensive range of shopping and recreational facilities. A short distance is Burnham Beeches, 540 acres of protected woodland which has been designated a National Nature Reserve and Special Area of Conservation. Buckinghamshire is renowned for its choice and standar d of schooling, and is one of the last counties to maintain the traditional grammar school system. Description Kitchen Double sitting room with multi fuel stove Dining room Master bedroom with two fitted wardrobes Double bedroom with fitted wardrobes Double bedroom Bathroom with shower over bath Linen cupboard Garden Two allocated parking spaces Energy Performance A copy of the full Energy Performance Certificate is available on request.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Reference Number
    Section 19 Flood Investigation – Hedgerley Lane, Beaconsfield FINAL 26th January 2015 Buckinghamshire County Council Flood Investigation Report Hedgerley Lane, Beaconsfield December 2013 - January 2014 Photo courtesy of Harrias House , 7th February 2014. Section 19 Flood Investigation – Hedgerley Lane, Beaconsfield FINAL 26th January 2015 Revision Schedule Buckinghamshire County council Flood Investigation Report 26th January 2015 Final revision number 2 Rev Date Details Author Checked and Approved by 1 18/12/2014 Draft for Review Jessica Dippie Karen Fisher 2 26/01/2015 Final Report Jessica Dippie Karen Fisher Section 19 Flood Investigation – Hedgerley Lane, Beaconsfield FINAL 26th January 2015 Table of Contents Page Number Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Background to investigation 2 1.2 Site location 3 1.3 Drainage system and river network 3 2. Background 5 2.1 Site characteristics 5 2.2 Previous flood events 6 3. Analysis of Flood Event 7 3.1 Conditions at the time 7 3.2 Condition of features 7 3.3 What happened? 8 3.4 Possible causes 8 3.5 Incident response 8 4. Responsible Authorities and Landowners 10 4.1 Lead Local Flood Authority 10 4.2 South Bucks District Council 10 4.3 Environment Agency 10 4.4 Highway Authority – Transport for Buckinghamshire 10 4.5 Water Utility Company – Thames Water 10 4.6 Landowners and riparian owners 11 4.7 Residents 11 4.8 Emergency responsibilities 11 5. Conclusions and Recommendations 13 5.1 Conclusions 13 5.2 Recommendations 13 Explanation of Acronyms 14 References 14 Contacts 15 Appendices 17 Section 19 Flood Investigation – Hedgerley Lane, Beaconsfield FINAL 26th January 2015 Executive Summary This report has been produced by Buckinghamshire County Council (BCC) to investigate the flooding that occurred on Hedgerley Lane in Beaconsfield between 4th and 16th January.
    [Show full text]