Landscape Leaflet FINAL July 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Design - Backland Development
Design - Backland Development Person ID 1223053 Full Name Paradigm Housing Group ID 5799 Order 34 Number 4.8 Title Design ± Backland Development Organisation Details Consultee Type - Please select the type of consultee: Date Received - Date Received: Duty to Cooperate Body - Is this organisation a Duty to Cooperate Body? Agent on behalf of - Consultee is an agent on behalf of: Person ID 1223052 Full Name Andy Meader 567 Organisation Details Plan-Level: Legally Compliant - Do you consider the Local Plan to be legally compliant/non-compliant. Legally compliant a - Please give details of why you consider the Local Plan is/is not legally compliant, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Legally compliant b - Are you proposing a modification to make the Local Plan legally compliant and/or to strengthen its compliance? Legally compliant c - Please set out your suggested modification(s) below:You will need to say why this modification(s) will make the Local Plan legally compliant/strengthen its legal compliance. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Plan-Level: Soundness - Do you believe this plan meets the tests of Soundness? Soundness mods - Please give details of why you consider this Local Plan is/is not sound, including references to relevant legislation, policies and/or regulations. Please be as precise and succinct as possible. Soundness mods - Are you proposing any modifications to strengthen the Plan©s ability meet the test of soundness? Policy 1a - Please specify how you would modify this policy to improve its alignment to this test of soundness. -
Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan 2036
Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan 2036 Details of ‘omission’ sites submitted during the Regulation 19 consultation 16 March 2020 (Version 5) 0 Contents Representor ID Site Address Page Amersham 1222566 Land at Quill Farm, Amersham 6 1224099 Land adjacent to Burial Ground, Old 7 Amersham 1224099 Gore Hill Farm, Amersham 8 1224099 Land at Homewood Terrace, Old 9 Amersham 1224099 Land north of High Street, Old Amersham 10 1224099 Land at School Lane, Old Amersham 11 1224099 Land north of London Road, Old 12 Amersham 1224428 Land at Copperkins Lane, Amersham 13 1224471 Betjeman Park, Raans Road, Amersham 14 1225353 Market Reading Field, off Eagle Close, 15 Quill Hall Lane, Amersham Beaconsfield 1224099 Land south of Holtspur, Beaconsfield 16 1224202 Land east of Chalfont Road, Seer Green, 17 Beaconsfield 1224488 Land South of A40, West of South Drive, 18 Beaconsfield (Site A) 1224488 Land south of A40, East of South Drive, 19 Beaconsfield (Site B) 1224488 Land South of A40 Wycombe End , 20 Beaconsfield (Sites C & D) 1224488 Land West of Pyebush Lane, Beaconsfield 21 (Site F) Boveney 1223049 Land at Boveney Court Farm buildings 22 and Paddocks, Boveney Burnham 1221063 Land at Dropmore Road, Burnham 23 1 1224127 Land at Ashcroft Tower, Poyle Lane, 24 Burnham 1224509 Land surrounding Pelham Burn, Grove 25 Road, Burnham Chalfont St Giles 1220931 Land at Bowstridge Lane, Chalfont St Giles 26 1221063 Gerrards Cross Golf Club, Vache Lane, 27 Chalfont St Giles 1223053 Land off High View, Chalfont St Giles 28 1223584 Land at Hooschmee, Turner Wood -
Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey Appendix: South Bucks District
Ancient Woodland Inventory for the Chilterns Appendix - South Bucks District Chiltern Woodlands CONSERVATION BOARD Project Chiltern District Council WYCOMBE DISTRICT COUNCIL an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty 1. Introduction his appendix summarises results from the Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey for the whole of South Bucks District in the County of Buckinghamshire (see map 1 for details). For more information on the project and Tits methodology, please refer to the main report, 1which can be downloaded from www.chilternsaonb.org The Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey area includes parts of Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and Oxfordshire. The extent of the project area included, but was not confined to, the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). 2 The work follows on from previous revisions in the South East. The Chilterns survey was hosted by the Chilterns Conservation Board with support from the Chiltern Woodlands Project, Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and Surrey Biodiversity Information Centre (SBIC). The work was funded by Buckinghamshire County Council, Chilterns Conservation Board, Chiltern District Council, Dacorum Borough Council, Forestry Commission, Hertfordshire County Council, Natural England and Wycombe District Council. Map 1: Project aims The Survey Area, showing Local Authority areas covered and the Chilterns AONB The primary aim of the County Boundaries survey was to revise and Chilterns AONB update the Ancient Entire Districts Woodland Inventory and Chiltern District -
General Area 74 Area (Ha) 538.0 Local Authority South Bucks
General Area 74 Area (ha) 538.0 Local South Bucks Authority Location Plan Description General Area 74 is located to the north and west of Iver Heath and contains land with planning permission for the expanded Pinewood Studios. It is bounded to the west by Black Park Road, Fulmer Common Road, Windmill Road and Fulmer Road, to the south by the A412, to the east by the M25 and to the north by the M40. Parts of the parcel’s eastern and south-eastern boundaries directly adjoin Iver Heath. Purpose Criteria Assessment Score (1) To check (a) Land parcel is at the The land parcel is not at the edge of an identified large built- FAIL the edge of one or more up area. unrestricted distinct large built-up sprawl of areas. large built-up (b) Prevents the outward 0 areas sprawl of a large built- up area into open land, and serves as a barrier at the edge of a large built- up area in the absence of another durable boundary. Purpose 1: Total Score 0/5 (2) To prevent Prevents development The parcel forms part of the wider gap between Gerrards 3 neighbouring that would result in Cross and Iver Heath, and Slough and Iver Heath. The towns from merging of or significant northern and south-western areas of the parcel in particular merging erosion of gap between play a role in maintaining the general scale and openness of neighbouring this gap and preventing the coalescence of the settlements, settlements, including though the south-eastern area is less important for preventing ribbon development coalescence. -
Town and Parish Councils in Aylesbury, Chiltern, South Bucks and Wycombe District Council Areas
Town and Parish Councils in Aylesbury, Chiltern, South Bucks and Wycombe District Council areas. Dear Town or Parish Council, Creation of Parish Charter You will no doubt be aware that contrary to published expectations there was no announcement from DCLG about a reorganisation of local government in Buckinghamshire in March. We have now been informed that, in the light of the General Election, the current government will make no decision in relation to the unitary question. There will need to be a formal consideration of the submissions that have been made by the new government. Whilst we are disappointed that this Government has not yet announced support for our proposals, we remain confident that a new Government will recognise the merits of the District Council proposal and create two new unitaries in Buckinghamshire. In the meantime you will be aware that the County Council has launched an online survey for anyone to indicate their views and express support for their preferred unitary option. Obviously we welcome your support in completing the survey in favour of two unitaries and the District proposal but recognise that surveys are not everyone’s cup of tea and it is very much up to you. The link is below if you would like to do so. http://futurebucks.co.uk/yourviews/ In the meantime we are keen to ensure that we do not lose momentum in taking forward some of the ideas in our proposals which we feel do not require a decision from government. In particular we suggested that a Town and Parish Charter would enable us to develop an understanding with parishes about how we want to work together moving forward. -
Dorney Parish News
Dorney Parish NewV )HEUXDU\ 1 Providing Care, Comfort and Companionship in Burnham. Join us for “Tea for Two” on Tuesdays! Bring a friend to enjoy tea, freshly baked cakes, our newly decorated dining room and beautiful landscaped surroundings. We look forward to welcoming you, every second Tuesday of the month, at 2:30pm. Find us: Parliament Lane, Burnham, Slough, SL1 8NU Call us to find out more: on 01628 667345 Email: [email protected] 2 ISSUE NO. 1/19 FEBRUARY 2019 EDITORIAL As we enter a New Year, we are in the midst of a political crisis. A right wing group seeks to rise roughshod over relationships that have endured for decades. Many citizens would like to return to how it was in the 1960s. Others feel what they were promised in the 1970s is different to how things have turned out. Meanwhile, remainers are striving to find any legal means to prevent what the government intends. Yes, we have to face it – the plans for a Unitary Council in Buckinghamshire are not going well. As the erstwhile Bucks district councils plan legal action against the Secretary of State’s scheme, one wonders again just why our County Councillor is so, to use his phrase, ‘delighted’, at Mr Brokenshire’s decision. Some call for a ‘Buxit’ with us re-locating in the Royal Borough and I recommend Virginia Silvester’s article in this issue on the evolution of Bucks’ borders to get an idea of how Dorney came to be poised on the edge of two counties. Anybody reading the Parish Council minutes in this issue will see how our representatives believe that decisions over liaison with the M4 Project are being taken far to the north of Dorney. -
South Bucks Councillor Update Economic Profile of Farnham Royal Ward
South Bucks Councillor Update Economic Profile of Farnham Royal Ward April 2014 Produced by Buckinghamshire Business First’s research department P a g e | 2 1.0 Introduction Farnham Royal is home to 5,499 people and provides 2,300 jobs in 62 businesses. Of these businesses, 25 (40.3 per cent) are Buckinghamshire Business First members. There were 3,814 employed people aged 16-74 living in Farnham Royal ward at the 2011 Census, 340 more than the 3,474 recorded in 2001. Over that period the working age population rose 297 to 3,272 while the total population rose 516 to 5,499. The number of households rose by 194 (10.0 per cent) to 2,126. This is a significant percentage increase and places the ward fourth out of all wards in South Bucks. Based on the increase in number of households, the ward ranks 18th out of all wards in Buckinghamshire. The largest companies in Farnham Royal include: Wyevale Garden Centres Ltd; Caldicott Preparatory School; A Perfect Valet; Farnham Common Infant School; Bishop Sports & Leisure Ltd; E P Rothwell & Sons Ltd; and Dair House School Trust Ltd. There are 38 Farnham Royal, representing 1.2 per cent of working age residents, including 25 claimants aged 25-49 and 25 who have been claiming for less than six months. Superfast broadband is expected to be available to 97 per cent of premises in the Farnham Royal ward by March 2016 with commercial providers responsible for the full 97 per cent. The Connected Counties project, run by BBF, will deliver no superfast broadband following this sufficient coverage from commercial suppliers. -
15 Road Drainage and the Water Environment
HIGHWAYS AGENCY – M4 JUNCTIONS 3 TO 12 SMART MOTORWAY 15 ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT 15.1 Introduction 15.1.1 This chapter assesses the impacts of the Scheme on road drainage and the water environment during construction and operation, focussing on the effects of highway drainage on the quality and hydrology of receiving waters. In view of the long design-life of the Scheme (30 years for new gantries, 40 years for new carriageway construction, and 120 years for new bridges), the decommissioning phase of the Scheme has not been considered in this chapter because its effects are not predicted to be worse than the effects assessed during the construction and operational phases. The chapter assesses four principal impacts: a) effects of routine runoff on surface water bodies; b) effects of routine runoff on groundwater; c) pollution impacts from spillages; and d) flood impacts. 15.1.2 Although Interim Advice Note (”IAN”) 161/13 ‘Managed Motorways, All lane running’ (Ref 15-1) has scoped out the assessment of ‘Road Drainage and the Water Environment’ for smart motorway schemes, the assessment is required to ensure the protection of the water environment, to prevent its degradation, and ensure adequate mitigation measures are in place to prevent any adverse impacts. 15.1.3 The road drainage and water environment assessment for the Scheme has been undertaken in accordance with standard industry practice and statutory guidance. 15.1.4 This chapter details the methodology followed for the assessment, and summarises the regulatory and policy framework relating to road drainage and the water environment. -
Coverage and Outreach
Global Carbon Project – Future Earth Carbon Budget 2017 Published 13 November 2017 Coverage and Outreach News agency promo-poster in Melbourne, Australia, 14 Nov. 2017 This document gives an overview of the coverage and outreach of the Global Carbon Budget 2017 release and associated publications and activities. It is intended to inform the team on how their work was reported and perceived worldwide. It is not exhaustive but still provides much detail to guide future outreach efforts. PRODUCTS 13 NOV 2018 1. Three papers (ESSD-CorinneL, NatureCC-GlenP, ERL-RobJ) 2. Data and ppt 3. GCP carbon budget webpage updates 4. Global Carbon Atlas updates 5. One Infographic 6. One Video (English, Spanish) 7. Two blogs (The Conversation-Pep, CarbonBrief-Glen) 8. Seven press releases (UEA, CICERO, Stanford University, CSIR-South Africa, China-Fundan University, Future Earth, European Climate Foundation) 9. Multiple Twitter and Facebook feeds. 10. Key Messages document (internal) SUMMARY OF COVERAGE AND OUTREACH • Media outlet coverage within the first week after publication (print and online; based on Meltwater searches on “Global Carbon Project”, “Global Carbon Budget”, “Global Carbon Budget 2017” and “2017 Global Carbon Budget” run by European Climate Foundation): Global coverage in 99 countries with a total of 2,792 media items (this count doesn’t include UK media), in 27 different languages. • OECD dominates coverage (particularly USA, UK, France, Germany, Canada, and Australia), but almost equally large coverage in China, India and Brazil (a great leap forward over previous years). South east Asia and Central/South America (except Brazil) some coverage too. Key to this success was working for the first time with the Climate Change Foundation facilitated by Future Earth (Owen, Alistair). -
Inequalities in Britain, Sociology Review, 21, 1, 15-19
Dorling, D. and Thomas, B. (2011) Mapping Inequalities in Britain, Sociology Review, 21, 1, 15-19. Inequalities in Britain Danny Dorling and Bethan Thomas This paper draws on three of the key topics we discuss in our new atlas, Bankrupt Britain: An atlas of social change (Dorling and Thomas 2011). 1. Public sector cuts: local and national implications In June 2010 the Department for Communities and Local Government published what is likely to become one of the most infamous documents of the economic recession, titled Local government contribution to efficiencies in 2010/11 (DCLG 2010). This document set out what many have argued are some of the most unfairly distributed cuts ever to be imposed on local government in England. The poor and the poorest areas of the country appeared to have been targeted to receive the deepest and most sustained cuts. This mirrored the effects of the national budget of that month that was also found, on examination by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (2010), to be highly regressive (taking more from the poor as a proportion of their income than from the rich). It may well not have been a coincidence that almost all of the areas to suffer the greatest service cuts contained a large majority of people who had voted against the two parties that had come to form the new coalition government. Map 1 shows where the main cuts will, from April 2011, hit most, least, and not at all. These are the first relatively modest local government cuts, of 'just' £6 billion. However, not a penny of that £6 billion is to be saved by the citizens of generally well-heeled districts such as Chiltern, South Bucks, most of Devon, Christchurch, most of Dorset, Cheltenham, the Cotswolds, Winchester, Broxbourne, most of Hertfordshire, Tunbridge Wells, Harrogate, most of Oxfordshire (but not Oxford), all of Surrey, the Malvern Hills and another hundred or so generally 'leafy' and mostly 'Tory' or 'Liberal Democrat' areas. -
The London Gazette, ?Th August 1987
10082 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH AUGUST 1987 as part of the Conservation Area is Church Circle, the area of which Colnbrook: The rest of the area of open space at Crown Meadow, is bounded by the rear of the curtilages of those properties on the formerly part of the hostel site and now open Green Belt land and outside of the Circle. the area to the north and east of the church, including the old (818) Vicarage which is rural in character and by virtue of its Green Belt designation intended to remain so. See Map J. II. Land to be removed from the Area of Special Control of SOUTH BUCKS DISTRICT COUNCIL Advertisements TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 Beaconsfield: Areas at Holtspur, Copperfields, Ledborough Wood, Lakes Lane/Malthouse Square and between Burkes Town toid Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations Road/Grove Road and the Oxford Road. These areas share similar 1984 characteristics to the other built-up residential parts of the town and should be treated similarly for the purpose of advertisement Notice is hereby given that the South Bucks District Council in control. See Map A. exercise of its powers under Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1984, has Burnham: Areas in the vicinity of the Bishop Centre, the built-up submitted for the approval of the Secretary of State for the area south of the Bath Road, Lent Green/Gore Road, Wymers Environment an Order modifying the Bucks County Council Wood Road/Poyle Lane, Hogfair Lane/Green Lane/The Fairway Control of Advertisements (Area of Special Control) No. -
Used As Reference Site Address Held As
South Bucks District Council Property Portfolio - January 2020 Used As Reference Site Address Held As Easting Northing Let As Oakside, Denham, Buckinghamshire, Amenity Land 2015/00440/PROPSB UB9 4BX Freehold 504941 185142 Lease from SBDC Stoke Place Boarding Kennels, Stoke Place Farmhouse, Stoke Place, Stoke Green, Stoke Poges, Boarding Kennels 2016/00497/PROPSB Buckinghamshire, SL2 4HT Freehold 498266 182272 Lease from SBDC Boat Yard, Mill Lane, Taplow, Boat Yard 2015/00472/PROPSB Buckinghamshire, SL6 0AA Freehold 490195 181385 Lease from SBDC Altons, Burkes Road, Beaconsfield, Car Park - Surface 2015/00416/PROPSB Buckinghamshire, HP9 1PB Freehold 493802 190990 Penncroft Car Park, Burkes Road, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, HP9 Car Park - Surface 2015/00418/PROPSB 1NZ Freehold 493865 190944 Lease from SBDC Car Park, Warwick Road, Car Park - Surface 2015/00427/PROPSB Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire Freehold 493813 191346 Lease from SBDC Car Park Opposite Neville Court, Dropmore Road, Burnham, Car Park - Surface 2015/00432/PROPSB Buckinghamshire Freehold 493129 182937 Lease from SBDC Car Park, Jennery Lane, Burnham, Car Park - Surface 2015/00434/PROPSB Buckinghamshire, SL1 8BX Freehold 493201 182606 Lease from SBDC Summers Road Car Park, Summers Car Park - Surface 2015/00438/PROPSB Road, Burnham, Buckinghamshire Freehold 493058 182535 Lease from SBDC Broadway Car Park and Public Conveniences, The Broadway, Beaconsfield Road, Farnham Car Park - Surface 2015/00450/PROPSB Common, Buckinghamshire Freehold 496048 185025 Lease from SBDC Bulstrode