DOCSLIB.ORG

Singular General Relativity Q Singular General Relativity Is the Application of the a = − Dt Methods of Singular Semi-Riemannian Geometry to R General Relativity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Singular General Relativity Q Singular General Relativity Is the Application of the a = − Dt Methods of Singular Semi-Riemannian Geometry to R General Relativity Singular General 3 Results: Smoothening black hole Relativity singularities How I learned to stop worrying and love Apparently, the black hole singularities are malign, the singularities because some of the components of the metric are divergent (gab ! 1). For the standard stationary Cristi Stoica ([email protected]) black holes, we can find transformations of coordi- nates which make them smooth. This also makes, for Relativity and Gravitation charged black holes, the electromagnetic potential and 100 Years after Einstein in Prague field smooth. The metric is put in a form which allows June 25 { 29, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic the evolution equations to go beyond the singularities. 1 Introduction: Do the singular- ities predict the breakdown of General Relativity? It is often said that General Rela- Malign singularities Benign singularities tivity predicts its own breakdown, gab ! 1 gab smooth, det g ! 0 by predicting the occurrence of sin- gularities. In addition, when trying 3.1 Schwarzschild black hole to quantize gravity, it appears to be perturbatively nonrenormalizable. In Schwarzschild coordinates • Are these problems signs that we should give up General Relativity in exchange for more radical ap- r − 2m r ds2 = − dt2 + dr2 + r2dσ2; proaches (superstrings, loop quantum gravity etc.)? r r − 2m • Are these limits of GR, or of our tools? • What if understanding the singularities also helps where dσ2 = dθ2 + sin2 θdφ2. with the problem of quantization?1 In non-singular coordinates [5] 4τ 4 ds2 = − dτ 2 2m − τ 2 2 The cure for singularities +(2m − τ 2)τ 2T −4 (T ξdτ + τdξ)2 + τ 4dσ2; where (r; t) 7! (τ 2; ξτ T ), T ≥ 2. 2.1 Singular semi-Riemannian geometry The methods of singular semi-Riemannian geometry 3.2 Reissner-Nordstr¨omblack hole (see [2, 3] and the appendix) allow us to: • find mathematical descriptions of singularities, In Reissner-Nordstr¨omcoordinates and understand them • replace the singular quanti- ties with regular ones, which are equivalent to them ∆ r2 ds2 = − dt2 + dr2 + r2dσ2 if det g 6= 0 • write non-singular field equations, for r2 ∆ example extensions of Einstein's equations where ∆ = r2 − 2mr + q2. The electromagnetic potential is singular: 2.2 Singular General Relativity q Singular General Relativity is the application of the A = − dt methods of singular semi-Riemannian geometry to r General Relativity. For this, the metric is required to be benign, but often a metric which is apparently In non-singular coordinates [6] 2 2T −2S−2 2 malign can be put in a form which is benign, by a ds = −∆ρ (ρdτ + T τdρ) S2 coordinate change. + ρ4S−2dρ2 + ρ2Sdσ2; • Malign singularity: g ! 1. Benign singularity: ∆ ab where (t; r) 7! (τρT ; ρS); T > S ≥ 1. g is smooth and det g = 0. The electromagnetic potential is non-singular: 1Usually is considered that when GR will be quantized, this will solve the singularities too, by showing probably that quan- A = −qρT −S−1 (ρdτ + T τdρ) tum fields prevent the occurrence of singularities. Here we will explore the opposite view. 1 1 4 Information paradox where Sab := Rab − 4 Rgab, and Penrose-Carter diagrams for non-rotating and electri- (h ◦ k)abcd := hackbd − hadkbc + hbdkac − hbckad: cally neutral evaporating black holes. In this case we can write the expanded Einstein equa- tion [11]: (G ◦ g)abcd + Λ(g ◦ g)abcd = κ(T ◦ g)abcd: The FLRW spacetime is the warped product I ×a Σ, a : I ! R, a ≥ 0, with metric ds2 = −dt2 + a2(t)dΣ2 3 3 3 where usually Σ is S ; R ; or H [3]. The energy density ρ and pressure density p are sin- gular at the Big-Bang, where a(t) = 0: A. If the singularity is malign, entering information is lost. When accounting for Quantum Mechanics, this 3 a_ 2 + k 6 a¨ ρ = ; ρ + 3p = − : causes in particular a violation of unitarity, if a system κ a2 κ a which is entangled with another system is lost in the singularity. B. If the singularity is benign, the field But in terms of the correct densities equations can be extended beyond the singularity, and p p the information is preserved [5{8]. ρe = ρ −g; pe = p −g; 5 Einstein equation at singularities the equations become smooth: 3 p 6 p Singular semi-Riemannian geometry (see appendix ρ = a a_ 2 + k g ; 3p + ρ = − a2a¨ g : e κ Σ e e κ Σ and [2,3]) introduces generalizations of semi-Riemann- ian spacetimes which admit degenerate metric but Hence, ρe and pe are smooth, as it is the densitized have smooth Riemann curvature Rabcd. But the Ein- stress-energy tensor stein tensor is usually singular. Yet, in 4D we can rewrite the Einstein equation in terms of quantities p T −g = (ρ + p) u u + pg : which remain smooth at singularities. The resulting ab e e a b e ab equations are equivalent to Einstein's so long as the These singularities are quasi-regular [9, 10]. metric is regular, but work as well at singularities. 5.1 Densitized Einstein equation On 4D semi-regular spacetimes the Riemann curvature Rabcd is smooth. Hence the Einstein tensor density G det g is smooth too, being: kst lpq Gab det g = gkla n Rstpq: We can write a densitized version of the Einstein equa- tion: Gab det g + Λgab det g = κTab det g; 6 Weyl curvature hypothesis For regular metric it is equivalent to Einstein's equa- tion, but works at singularities too [2]. The Weyl curvature hypothesis was proposed by R. Penrose, to account for the high homogeneity and low entropy characterizing the Big-Bang. It states that at 5.2 Expanded Einstein equation the Big-Bang singularity, the Weyl curvature tensor A quasi-regular spacetime is a 4D semi-regular mani- Cabcd = 0. fold with smooth Ricci decomposition At a quasi-regular Big-Bang singularity, Cabcd is 1 1 smooth. At the singularity it vanishes, because it lives Rabcd = R(g ◦ g)abcd + (S ◦ g)abcd + Cabcd in T •M, which has dimension ≤ 3 at singularities [12]. 12 2 2 7 Dimensional reduction 1 Gab = Rab − Rgab and Quantum Gravity 2 These quantities are not usually defined even if gab are ab Different results suggest that a dimension < 4 may act finite, since g ! 1 when det g ! 0. like a dimensional regulator for QFT and for QG. In lower dimension, the Weyl tensor vanishes, and the lo- A.2 The idea of a solution cal degrees of freedom (gravitational waves and gravi- Use non-singular quantities, equivalent to the singular tons) disappear, allowing QG to be renormalizable. ones for non-degenerate metric g. Benign singularities undergo a dimensional reduc- Singular Non-Singular When g is... tion, and may be the needed dimensional regularizers Γc (2nd) Γ (1st) smooth for QG: ab abc Rd R semi-regular • g is independent on some directions. abc abcd p ab p W • − det g ! 0, reducing the contribution of lower Rab Rab j det gj ;W ≤ 2 semi-regular W distance Feynman integrals. R Rpj det gj ;W ≤ 2 semi-regular • The admissible fields live in lower dimension spaces: Rab Ric ◦ g quasi-regular R Rg ◦ g quasi-regular rank g = dim T M = dim T •M < 4: p p• p But how to define them? • For quasi-regular singularities Cabcd = 0. A.3 Degenerate metric and The quantities det g and Cabcd vanish as approaching covariant contraction singularities. But QG needs them to decrease with the (V,g) V* scale. They may do this: As the energy approaches the UV limit, the num- ber of the particles in Feynman diagrams increases. u+w w (V●,g ) If particles are benign singularities, this means lower u ● det g and Cabcd. We conjecture: this gives the needed regularization [13]. V●=V/V○ ● (V●,g ) u● (V; g) is an inner product vector space. The mor- phism [ : V ! V ∗ is defined by u 7! u• := [(u) = [ ? u = g(u; ). The radical V ◦ := ker [ = V is the set of isotropic vectors in V . V • := im [ ≤ V ∗ is the image of [. The inner product g induces on V • [ [ A Singular semi-Riemannian an inner product defined by g•(u1; u1) := g(u1; u2), Geometry which is the inverse of g iff det g 6= 0. The quotient V • := V=V ◦ consists in the equivalence classes of the • A singular semi-Riemannian manifold (M; g) is a form u + V ◦. On V •, g induces an inner product • differentiable manifold M with a symmetric bilinear g (u1 + V ◦; u2 + V ◦) := g(u1; u2). form g, named metric, on the tangent bundle TM. • Once we have defined the reciprocal inner product The metric g may be indefinite, and may be degenerate g•(!; τ), we can define covariant contraction for • (i.e. det g = 0 at some points). It may have constant 1-forms from V . Then we define it for tensors with • or variable signature. two covariant indices living in V . • Malign singularity: gab ! 1. Benign singularity: g is smooth and det g = 0. T (!1;:::; •;:::; •;:::;!k) A.1 The problem • We extend these definitions to a singular semi-Rie- The geometric quantities can't be defined: mannian manifold (M; g). 1 c cs i π Γ ab = g (@agbs + @bgsa − @sgab) ◦ • • 2 0 T ◦pM (TpM; g) (V •; g ) 0 [ T d d d d s d s p M [ ] R abc = Γ ac;b − Γ ab;c + Γ bsΓ ac − Γ csΓ ab ◦ • ◦ π ∗ i • s pq 0 T pM Tp M (T pM; g•) 0 Rab = R asb;R = g Rpq 3 A.4 Covariant derivative The usual definition of warped product requires (B; g ) and (F; g ) to be non-degenerate, and f > 0.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modified Theories of Relativistic Gravity
    Modified Theories of Relativistic Gravity: Theoretical Foundations, Phenomenology, and Applications in Physical Cosmology by c David Wenjie Tian A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theoretical Physics (Interdisciplinary Program) Faculty of Science Date of graduation: October 2016 Memorial University of Newfoundland March 2016 St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador Abstract This thesis studies the theories and phenomenology of modified gravity, along with their applications in cosmology, astrophysics, and effective dark energy. This thesis is organized as follows. Chapter 1 reviews the fundamentals of relativistic gravity and cosmology, and Chapter 2 provides the required Co-authorship 2 2 Statement for Chapters 3 ∼ 6. Chapter 3 develops the L = f (R; Rc; Rm; Lm) class of modified gravity 2 µν 2 µανβ that allows for nonminimal matter-curvature couplings (Rc B RµνR , Rm B RµανβR ), derives the “co- herence condition” f 2 = f 2 = − f 2 =4 for the smooth limit to f (R; G; ) generalized Gauss-Bonnet R Rm Rc Lm gravity, and examines stress-energy-momentum conservation in more generic f (R; R1;:::; Rn; Lm) grav- ity. Chapter 4 proposes a unified formulation to derive the Friedmann equations from (non)equilibrium (eff) thermodynamics for modified gravities Rµν − Rgµν=2 = 8πGeffTµν , and applies this formulation to the Friedman-Robertson-Walker Universe governed by f (R), generalized Brans-Dicke, scalar-tensor-chameleon, quadratic, f (R; G) generalized Gauss-Bonnet and dynamical Chern-Simons gravities. Chapter 5 systemati- cally restudies the thermodynamics of the Universe in ΛCDM and modified gravities by requiring its com- patibility with the holographic-style gravitational equations, where possible solutions to the long-standing confusions regarding the temperature of the cosmological apparent horizon and the failure of the second law of thermodynamics are proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • M-Eigenvalues of the Riemann Curvature Tensor of Conformally Flat Manifolds
    Commun. Math. Res. Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 336-353 doi: 10.4208/cmr.2020-0052 August 2020 M-Eigenvalues of the Riemann Curvature Tensor of Conformally Flat Manifolds Yun Miao1, Liqun Qi2 and Yimin Wei3,∗ 1 School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, P. R. of China. 2 Department of Applied Mathematics, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong. 3 School of Mathematical Sciences and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Contemporary Applied Mathematics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, P. R. of China. Received 6 May 2020; Accepted 28 May 2020 Abstract. We investigate the M-eigenvalues of the Riemann curvature tensor in the higher dimensional conformally flat manifold. The expressions of M- eigenvalues and M-eigenvectors are presented in this paper. As a special case, M-eigenvalues of conformal flat Einstein manifold have also been discussed, and the conformal the invariance of M-eigentriple has been found. We also reveal the relationship between M-eigenvalue and sectional curvature of a Rie- mannian manifold. We prove that the M-eigenvalue can determine the Rie- mann curvature tensor uniquely. We also give an example to compute the M- eigentriple of de Sitter spacetime which is well-known in general relativity. AMS subject classifications: 15A48, 15A69, 65F10, 65H10, 65N22 Key words: M-eigenvalue, Riemann curvature tensor, Ricci tensor, conformal invariant, canonical form. ∗Corresponding author. Email addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (Y. Wei), [email protected] (Y. Miao), [email protected] (L. Qi) Y. Miao, L. Qi and Y. Wei / Commun. Math. Res., 36 (2020),pp.336-353 337 1 Introduction The eigenvalue problem is a very important topic in tensor computation [4].
    [Show full text]
  • M-Eigenvalues of Riemann Curvature Tensor of Conformally Flat Manifolds
    M-eigenvalues of Riemann Curvature Tensor of Conformally Flat Manifolds Yun Miao∗ Liqun Qi† Yimin Wei‡ August 7, 2018 Abstract We generalized Xiang, Qi and Wei’s results on the M-eigenvalues of Riemann curvature tensor to higher dimensional conformal flat manifolds. The expression of M-eigenvalues and M-eigenvectors are found in our paper. As a special case, M-eigenvalues of conformal flat Einstein manifold have also been discussed, and the conformal the invariance of M- eigentriple has been found. We also discussed the relationship between M-eigenvalue and sectional curvature of a Riemannian manifold. We proved that the M-eigenvalue can determine the Riemann curvature tensor uniquely and generalize the real M-eigenvalue to complex cases. In the last part of our paper, we give an example to compute the M-eigentriple of de Sitter spacetime which is well-known in general relativity. Keywords. M-eigenvalue, Riemann Curvature tensor, Ricci tensor, Conformal invariant, Canonical form. AMS subject classifications. 15A48, 15A69, 65F10, 65H10, 65N22. 1 Introduction The eigenvalue problem is a very important topic in tensor computation theories. Xiang, Qi and Wei [1, 2] considered the M-eigenvalue problem of elasticity tensor and discussed the relation between strong ellipticity condition of a tensor and it’s M-eigenvalues, and then extended the M-eigenvalue problem to Riemann curvature tensor. Qi, Dai and Han [12] introduced the M-eigenvalues for the elasticity tensor. The M-eigenvalues θ of the fourth-order tensor Eijkl are defined as follows. arXiv:1808.01882v1 [math.DG] 28 Jul 2018 j k l Eijkly x y = θxi, ∗E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Invariant Construction of Cosmological Models Erik Jörgenfelt
    Invariant Construction of Cosmological Models Erik Jörgenfelt Spring 2016 Thesis, 15hp Bachelor of physics, 180hp Department of physics Abstract Solutions to the Einstein field equations can be constructed from invariant objects. If a solution is found it is locally equivalent to all solutions constructed from the same set. Here the method is applied to spatially-homogeneous solutions with pre-determined algebras, under the assumption that the invariant frame field of standard vectors is orthogonal on the orbits. Solutions with orthogonal fluid flow of Bianchi type III are investigated and two classes of orthogonal dust (zero pressure) solutions are found, as well as one vacuum energy solution. Tilted dust solutions with non-vanishing vorticity of Bianchi types I–III are also investigated, and it is shown that no such solution exist given the assumptions. Sammanfattning Lösningar till Einsteins fältekvationer kan konstrueras från invarianta objekt. Om en lösning hittas är den lokalt ekvivalent till alla andra lösningar konstruerade från samma mängd. Här appliceras metoden på spatialt homogena lösningar med förbestämda algebror, under anta- gandet att den invarianta ramen med standard-vektorer är ortogonal på banorna. Lösningar med ortogonalt fluidflöde av Bianchi typ III undersöks och två klasser av dammlösningar (noll tryck) hittas, liksom en vakum-energilösning. Dammlösningar med lut och noll-skild vorticitet av Bianchi typ I–III undersöks också, och det visas att inga sådana lösningar existerar givet antagandena. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Preliminaries 3 2.1 Smooth Manifolds...................................3 2.2 The Tangent and Co-tangent Bundles........................4 2.3 Tensor Fields and Differential Forms.........................6 2.4 Lie Groups......................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Amsterdam
    University of Amsterdam MSc Physics Theoretical Physics Master Thesis The BTZ Black Hole In Metric and Chern-Simons Formulation by Eline van der Mast 0588105 July 2014 54 ECTS 02/2013 - 07/2014 Supervisor: Examiner: A. Castro, Dr. J. de Boer, Prof. Institute for Theoretical Physics Amsterdam ABSTRACT In this thesis, we review the BTZ black hole within the metric formulation of gen- eral relativity and Chern-Simons theory. We introduce the necessary concepts of general relativity and discuss three-dimensional gravity, specifically Anti-de Sitter vacuum space. Then, we review the identification process to get to the BTZ black hole solution, as well as an explicit quotienting formulation. The thermodynamic and geometric properties of the black hole are then discussed. The Brown-York stress tensor procedure is explained to give these properties physical meaning, with a correction by Balasubramanian and Kraus. In the second part of this thesis we introduce Chern-Simons theory and show its equivalence to three-dimensional gravity. The BTZ black hole is then shown to be defined through holonomies and thermodynamics. We find that the identifications in the metric formulation are equivalent to the holonomies in the Chern-Simons formulation; and the thermo- dynamics are the same. CONTENTS 1. Introduction :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 6 2. Introduction to Gravity ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 8 2.1 General Relativity . .8 2.1.1 Differential Geometry . .9 2.1.2 The Riemann Tensor . .9 2.2 Gravity in Three Dimensions . 11 2.2.1 Degrees of Freedom . 11 3. Local and Global Aspects of Anti-de Sitter Space ::::::::::::: 13 3.1 Global Anti-de Sitter Space .
    [Show full text]
  • Open Craig Price-Dissertation.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Eberly College of Science COVARIANT FORMULATIONS OF THE LIGHT-ATOM PROBLEM A Dissertation in Physics by Craig Chandler Price © 2018 Craig Chandler Price Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2018 The dissertation of Craig Chandler Price was reviewed and approved∗ by the following: Nathan D. Gemelke Assistant Professor of Physics Dissertation Advisor, Chair of Committee David S. Weiss Professor of Physics Associate Head for Research Marcos Rigol Professor of Physics Zhiwen Liu Professor of Electrical Engineering Nitin Samarth Professor of Physics Department Head ∗Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii Abstract We explore the ramifications of the light-matter interaction of ultracold neutral atoms in a covariant, or coordinate free, approach in the quantum limit. To do so we describe the construction and initial characterization of a novel atom-optical system in which there is no obvious preferred coordinate system but is fed back upon itself to amplify coherent quantum excitations of any emergent spontaneous order of the system. We use weakly dissipative, spatially incoherent light that is modulated by amplified fluctuations of the phase profile of a Sagnac interferometer whose symmetry is broken by the action of a generalized Raman sideband cooling process. The cooling process is done in a limit of low probe intensity which effectively produces slow light and forms a platform to explore general relativistic analogues. The disordered potential landscape is populated with k-vector defects where the atomic density contracts with an inward velocity potentially faster than the speed of the slow light at that region.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Derive the Kerr Metric by Cheating Quite a Bit; a Lecture Given to Mat 451 on April 23, 2009
    HOW TO DERIVE THE KERR METRIC BY CHEATING QUITE A BIT; A LECTURE GIVEN TO MAT 451 ON APRIL 23, 2009 WILLIE W. WONG Abstract. In this set of notes, an unconventional method of deriving the Kerr metric is presented. 1. Introduction and the first ansatz In this note we give a heuristic derivation of the Kerr metric, in a way quite significantly different from the classical methods. This is in no way a formal write- up, so for a more rigorous derivation, and for references, please see the wonderful article by Roberto Bergamini and Stefano Viaggiu, “A novel derivation for Kerr metric in Papapetrou gauge.”1 The method described herein is inspired by Marc Mars’ paper “A spacetime characterization of the Kerr metric”2, and also by the author’s 2009 PhD dissertation. The question we seek to answer is: find a solution of the Einstein vacuum equa- tions that is stationary and axially symmetric. However, to actually answer the question, we will need to impose very significant, and not ab initio justifiable, con- straints. It is only with great hindsight (that we know the solution we seek already) that the constraints seem natural. On the other hand, we will try to argue that these constraints are not completely wild guesses: by following a particular coher- ent chain of thought, it may have been possible to have obtained the Kerr metric through this method with no prior knowledge of the metric. The principal argument here is thus: we first consider the Ernst potential on a stationary solution to the Einstein equations.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Smooth Manifolds
    Appendix A Review of Smooth Manifolds This book is designed for readers who already have a solid understanding of basic topology and smooth manifold theory, at roughly the level of [LeeTM] and [LeeSM]. In this appendix, we summarize the main ideas of these subjects that are used throughout the book. It is included here as a review, and to establish our notation and conventions. Topological Preliminaries An n-dimensional topological manifold (or simply an n-manifold) is a second- countable Hausdorff topological space that is locally Euclidean of dimension n, meaning that every point has a neighborhood homeomorphic to an open subset of Rn. Given an n-manifold M ,acoordinate chart for M is a pair .U;'/, where U  M is an open set and ' W U ! Uy is a homeomorphism from U to an open subset Uy  Rn.Ifp 2 M and .U;'/ is a chart such that p 2 U , we say that .U;'/ is a chart containing p. We also occasionally need to consider manifolds with boundary. An n-dimen- sional topological manifold with boundary is a second-countable Hausdorff space in which every point has a neighborhood homeomorphic either to an open subset Rn Rn 1 n Rn of or to a (relatively) open subset of the half-space C Df.x ;:::;x / 2 W xn 0g. A pair .U;'/, where U is an open subset of M and ' is a homeomorphism Rn Rn from U to an open subset of or C, is called an interior chart if '.U/ is an Rn Rn Rn Rn open subset of or an open subset of C that does not meet @ C Dfx 2 C W n Rn x D 0g; and it is called a boundary chart if '.U/ is an open subset of C with Rn ¿ M '.U/\ @ C ¤ .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2107.12285V1 [Math.DG] 26 Jul 2021 1 Introduction
    About left-invariant geometry and homogeneous pseudo-Riemannian Einstein structures on the Lie group SU(3) Robert Coquereaux Aix Marseille Univ, Universit´ede Toulon, CNRS, CPT, Marseille, France Centre de Physique Th´eorique July 27, 2021 Abstract This is a collection of notes on the properties of left-invariant metrics on the eight-dimensional compact Lie group SU(3). Among other topics we investigate the existence of invariant pseudo-Riemannian Einstein metrics on this manifold. We recover the known examples (Killing metric and Jensen metric) in the Riemannian case (signature (8; 0)), as well as a Gibbons et al example of signature (6; 2), and we describe a new example, which is Lorentzian (i.e., of signature (7; 1). In the latter case the associated metric is left-invariant, with isometry group SU(3) × U(1), and has positive Einstein constant. It seems to be the first example of a Lorentzian homogeneous Einstein metric on this compact manifold. These notes are arranged into a paper that deals with various other subjects unrelated with the quest for Einstein metrics but that may be of independent interest: among other topics we describe the various groups that may arise as isometry groups of left-invariant metrics on SU(3), provide parametrizations for these metrics, give several explicit results about the curvatures of the corresponding Levi-Civita connec- tions, discuss modified Casimir operators (quadratic, but also cubic) and Laplace-Beltrami operators. In particular we discuss the spectrum of the Laplacian for metrics that are invariant under SU(3) × U(2), a subject that may be of interest in particle physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Singular General Relativity Ph.D
    University Politehnica of Bucharest Faculty of Applied Sciences Singular General Relativity Ph.D. Thesis Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica Supervisor arXiv:1301.2231v4 [gr-qc] 24 Jan 2014 Prof. dr. CONSTANTIN UDRIS¸TE Corresponding Member of the Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti, Messina Full Member of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Bucharest 2013 Declaration of Authorship I, Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica, declare that this Thesis titled, `Singular General Relativity' and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly at- tributed. Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this Thesis is entirely my own work. I have acknowledged all main sources of help. Signed: Date: i Abstract This work presents the foundations of Singular Semi-Riemannian Geometry and Singular General Relativity, based on the author's research. An extension of differential geometry and of Einstein's equation to singularities is reported. Singularities of the form studied here allow a smooth extension of the Einstein field equations, including matter. This applies to the Big-Bang singularity of the FLRW solution. It applies to stationary black holes, in appropriate coordinates (since the standard coordinates are singular at singu- larity, hiding the smoothness of the metric). In these coordinates, charged black holes have the electromagnetic potential regular everywhere. Implications on Penrose's Weyl curvature hypothesis are presented. In addition, these singularities exhibit a (geo)metric dimensional reduction, which might act as a regulator for the quantum fields, includ- ing for quantum gravity, in the UV regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter Gravity Generated by the S(4,0)
    Dark Matter Gravity Generated by the S(4,0) Tensor [?] Dark matter gravity generated by the S(4,0) tensor, the part of the Riemann curvature tensor R(4,0) defined as g(il)g(jk) - g(ik)g(jl), new dark matter energy tensor D(4,0) defined Jes´us Delso Lapuerta Bachelor’s Degree in Physics, Zaragoza University, Spain. [email protected] January 6, 2021 Abstract Dark matter gravity generated by the S(4,0) tensor, the part of the Riemann curvature tensor R(4,0) defined as g(il)g(jk) - g(ik)g(jl), new Total Energy T(4,0) and energy tensors are defined to complete the General Relativity field equa- tions. The Ricci decomposition is a way of breaking up the Riemann curvature tensor into three orthogonal tensors, Z(4,0), Weyl tensor C(4,0) and S(4,0), S tensor generates the dark matter gravity observed, galaxies in our universe are rotating with such speed that the gravity generated by their observable matter could not possibly hold them together 1 Conformal energy U defined as a combination of C and the Hodge dual of C, dark matter energy D defined as a combination of S and the Hodge dual of S, similar definitions for V/Z and T/R The Ricci decomposition is a way of breaking up the Riemann curvature tensor into three orthogonal tensors, Z , Weyl tensor C and S, S tensor generates the dark matter gravity Rijkl = Zijkl + Cijkl + Sijkl 1 S = R (g g − g g ) ijkl 12 il jk ik jl 1 1 Yjk = Rjk − Rg jk , Z ijkl = 2 !Yil gjk − Yjl gik − Yik gjl + Yjk gil 4 where Rabcd is the Riemann tensor, Rab is the Ricci tensor, R is the Ricci scalar (the scalar curvature)
    [Show full text]
  • Curvature of Riemannian Manifolds - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 3/31/10 1:54 PM
    Curvature of Riemannian manifolds - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 3/31/10 1:54 PM Curvature of Riemannian manifolds From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In mathematics, specifically differential geometry, the infinitesimal geometry of Riemannian manifolds with dimension at least 3 is too complicated to be described by a single number at a given point. Riemann introduced an abstract and rigorous way to define it, now known as the curvature tensor. Similar notions have found applications everywhere in differential geometry. For a more elementary discussion see the article on curvature which discusses the curvature of curves and surfaces in 2 and 3 dimensions. The curvature of a pseudo-Riemannian manifold can be expressed in the same way with only slight modifications. Contents 1 Ways to express the curvature of a Riemannian manifold 1.1 The Riemann curvature tensor 1.1.1 Symmetries and identities http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curvature_of_Riemannian_manifolds Page 1 of 10 Curvature of Riemannian manifolds - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 3/31/10 1:54 PM 1.2 Sectional curvature 1.3 Curvature form 1.4 The curvature operator 2 Further curvature tensors 2.1 Scalar curvature 2.2 Ricci curvature 2.3 Weyl curvature tensor 2.4 Ricci decomposition 3 Calculation of curvature 4 References 5 Notes Ways to express the curvature of a Riemannian manifold The Riemann curvature tensor Main article: Riemann curvature tensor The curvature of Riemannian manifold can be described in various ways; the most standard one is the curvature tensor, given in terms of a Levi-Civita connection (or covariant differentiation) and Lie bracket by the following formula: Here R(u,v) is a linear transformation of the tangent space of the manifold; it is linear in each argument.
    [Show full text]