......

DataPlan, Inc. 347 Franklin Street, Slippery Rock, PA 16057

...... FORD CITY BOROUGH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ......

The preparation of this document was financed in part through a SPAG grant from the Department of Community Affairs under the provision of Act 6A approved June 16, 1994, as administered by the Bureau of Community Planning, Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs.

August 1995 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I I

I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 I Preface ...... 1 Introduction ...... 3 I Statement of Objectives ...... 7 Visions ...... 10 Community Facilities and Services ...... 13 I Housing ...... 21 Population ...... 32 1 Employment and Income ...... 38 Transportation and Circulation ...... 56 I Existing Land Use ...... 63 Development Constraints ...... 70 I Regional Relationship ...... 71 Land Use Plan ...... 75 I Action Plan ...... 91 Capital Improvement Program ...... 96 1 Funding Mechanisms ...... 101 I I 11 I I I Table of Contents FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

LIST OF TABLES

Table # #1 Ford City Catholic School Enrollment ...... 19 #2 Armstrong School District Enrollment ...... 20 #3 Age of Housing ...... 23 #4 Housing Characteristics ...... 24 #5 Total Housing Units ...... 24 I #6 Year Moved into Housing Unit ...... 25 #7 Occupation Characteristics ...... 26 I #8 Number of Housing Units in the Structure ...... 27 #9 Households by Size ...... 28 I #10 Average Household Size ...... 28 #11 Vacancy Rates ...... 29 I #12 Median Housing Value ...... 29 #13 Housing Values ...... 29 I #14 Age Distribution ...... 32 #15 Age Distribution .Percentage ...... 32 1 #16 Population Total 1940-1990 ...... 33 #17 1990 Age/Sex Distribution ...... 33 I #18 Number of Families ...... 34 #19 Employment by Industry ...... 39 I #20 Household Income ...... 42 #21 Employment by Occupation ...... 43 #22 Employment by Industry ...... 44 #23 Total Employment ...... 44 #24 Retail Employment ...... 46 #25 Total Taxes Collected ...... 50 #26 Taxes Collected by Type ...... 52 #27 Expenditures ...... 52 #28 Street Characteristics ...... 61 #29 Recreational Facilities ...... 66 #30 Types of Land Uses ...... 69

Table of Contents FORD ClTY BOROUGH - COMP REHENSIVE PLAN

Table # #31 Population ...... 72 #32 Age Groups .1990 ...... 72 #33 Income .1990 ...... 73 'I #34 Housing- 1990 ...... 73 I LIST OF CHARTS Chart # I #1 AssessedValue ...... 40 #2 Per Capita Revenue & Expenses ...... 41 I #3 Real Estate Tax Revenue ...... 48 #4 Earned Income Tax Revenues ...... 49 I #5 Total Taxes Collected ...... 50 I I LIST OF MAPS Regional Locator Street Map Community Facilities Development Factors 'I Roadways Current Zoning Land Use 1 Floodplains Future Land Use I APPENDIX

Ford City Borough Public Meeting Report ..... 105 Ford City Borough Attitude Survey ...... 111

Table of Contents I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I PREFACE

Ford City Borough has experienced a downturn during the past decade I and a half in both its employment and resident base, due mainly to the economic decline of the PPG works and other manufacturing facilities in I the region. Both the Borough Council and Planning Commission feel that it is 1 necessary to enter the 21st century with a current planning document which provides a reasoned approach to development and for I preservation decision-making. The updating of the Comprehensive Plan will provide standards for local I officials, as well as the private sector, in which to guide future growth/preservation activities in the Borough. I This document was completed through a joint effort of Borough officials with the intent of establishing a "direction" of activities in order to provide a safe, 1 strong, healthy community as it moves into the 21st century. 1994-1 995 I Mayor - John Zanetti I Borough Council

1 Jerry Miklos, President Pat Lazaroff Grace Charney Ron Wojcik I Lou Vergari Jean Palerno 1 Planning Commission I Scott Davis, Chairman Jeff Mantini 1 Jo-Ann Scope1 Mary Ann Faykosh Frank Ganzlmar Juanita Carr I Pearl Petrie

I Preface, Page 1 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1

Zoning Hearing Board I Ronald Dillard, Chairman Nancy Mantini I Donna Piper Tim Malec Doris Herbst I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I

Preface, Page 2 I I I I FORD CITY BOROUGH I -1 I I I I I I I I I I FLUMCREEK ,/ Inset Scale 2x Map Scale I

I h'crrh Euffoo ruwnship I I Eethel Township I I ?

1 II I I SCALE IN FEET FORD CITY BOROUGH 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 ARMSTRONG COUNTY PREPARED BY DATAPIAN, INC.. JUNE 1995 INTRODUCTION

The planning process is a means to channel community activity, and ,I development, toward the stated long-range goals, as identified after review and analysis of existing conditions and past trends. The process acts as a policy guide for elected officials as well as, a framework which can coordinate all subsequent plans, programs and proposals with the major issues that exist in the Borough. The effectiveness of the planning process will be determined by the effect it has on future decision-making within the Borough.

With this thought in mind, the Borough officials have begun to view the 1 planning process as a positive means of determining the quality of the Borough's environment. With the recent demise of the Borough's major employer and I taxpayer, there exists a new concern for community conservation and the need to upgrade the review and approval process of all development activity.

I This plan for the Borough of Ford City has been developed in response to several current concerns regarding present and future land conditions and I program availability within the Borough, such as I land use redevelopment land use compatibility 1 housing conditions recreation facility availability I municipal services (water and sewer) elderly-assistance programs 1 service cooperation arrangements with neighboring communities I land use regulations (Zoning Ordinance , building codes) The intent of this program is to assist in establishing techniques for community I conservation for the elected and appointed officials of the Borough. The community conservation process for the Borough begins and ends with I Borough Council through the assistance of the various appointed boards, and Borough personnel. The residents of the Borough can also have a major role in Introduction, Page 3 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

the review process as well as determining the specific goals necessary to I preserve the Borough's quality of life. I Several issues must be considered in the planning process, be it due to growth pressures, or to conservation motives, in molding the community's goals, including: I 8 the protection of environmentally-sensitive areas I 8 floodplain management rn historic preservation I S citizen participation 8 fiscal planning I 8 capital improvement planning

S site plan review procedures I

S zoning ordinance update

8 code enforcement I 8 community conservation I The concern for the Borough at this time focuses on developing the means of addressing the key issues identified above, as well as those objectives identified in 1 this plan.

Planning is an on-going process within a community. In order for it to remain a I viable part of the community's everyday process, the local officials must continually review and update the plan to keep it current with the Borough's changing needs. I

A prime example is the planning document developed for the Borough in 1967. I Several goals and conclusions, which were acceptable at the time, are no longer applicable to the needs of the Borough. I Conversely, the planning document, through its analysis of the existing statistics and trends , will generate recommendations and conclusions that can I hold true for the identified time period. I

Introduction, Page 4 I I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I The 1967 Comprehensive Plan generated several conclusions and developed I several goals that may still be adequate today, such as: That the Comprehensive Plan be the guide for the orderly development or redevelopment of the Borough. I That the Borough relate its physical and financial capabilities to support needed changes and facilities. I That the Borough maintain and improve its assets while developing solutions to correct its community problems. I That the Borough strive for a civic improvement program through a sound and orderly program of progress. I That the Borough direct its efforts towards community improvement by utilizing the services of all segments of the population.

I This document will review all of the conclusions stated in the earlier plan and will update those that need to be revised and generate new goals and objectives I based on a review of an inventory of existing conditions in order to gauge recent trends and project future conditions. I Document List 1 1. 1967 Land Use Map. 2. 1985 Fiscal Analysis - Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs. I 3. 1986 Fiscal Analysis - Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs. 4. 1987 Fiscal Analysis - Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs. I 5. 1988 Fiscal Analysis - Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs. 6. 1989 Fiscal Analysis - Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs. 7. 1990 Fiscal Analysis - Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs. 8. 1991 Fiscal Analysis - Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs. 9. 1992 Fiscal Analysis - Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs. 10. Armstrong County Planning Department Statistics. 11. Armstrong County PPG Site Analysis and Report. 12. Attitude Survey - Borough Statistics. 13. Attitude Survey - PPG Site Development.

introduction, Page 5 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

14. Demographic Report - Center for Rural Pennsylvania. I 15. Ford City Borough - 1993 Budget. 16. Ford City Borough - 1994 Budget. 1 17. Ford City Borough - 1995 Budget. 18. Ford City Borough Master Plan - 1967. I 19. Ford City Borough Permit Records. 20. General Population Summary - 1990 Census of Population and Housing. I 21. Sewer Authority Maps. I 22. Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission - 1980-1 990 Comparison. 23. Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission - 201 5 Long I Range Transportation Plan. 24. Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission - Daily Traffic I Counts. 25. Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission Municipal I Profile - 1990. 26. Southwestern Regional Planning Commission - 1990 Census - STF 3 Files. I 27. Water Authority Maps. 28. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Maintenance/Functional I Classification of Roads. 29. Armstrong School District Projections. I 30. Mid County Transit Authority Schedule. I I I I I

Introduction, Page 6 1 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES

I Ford City Borough, as with many towns in the region, has experienced a severe drop in its population base due to a corresponding decline in its employment base I - which accompanied the closure of the Pittsburgh Plate and Glass facility. This regional facility has negatively affected the employment base of the County, and I several neighboring municipalities, as well as that of the Borough.

The Borough's elected officials and appointed boards have determined that the I development of an updated planning document which identifies current standards and provides facility and growth management procedures and recommendations, I is a priority for the health, safety and general welfare of the Borough residents.

I As such, this document has been developed with the intent to provide a guide through which the elected and appointed officials may refer to in addressing I identified needs, proposed programs, and future improvement activities. The following statements provide general guidelines for future planning and I activities. The objectives provide a framework for more detailed policies and recommendations contained within this document and focus on the protection of I the quality of life in the Borough: 1. Encourage participation in the planning and development process of the I Borough by interested civic organizations, as well as individuals. 2. Encourage civic pride in the Borough to preserve and/or improve the I physical environment of the Borough. 3. Establish a strong planning base to aid the elected officials in the I decision-making process for the Borough. 4. Enact and ENFORCE the various ordinances and codes necessary to maintain and/or improve the quality of the existing and future housing I stock. 5. Encourage the continued development of existing Borough recreation I facilities and opportunities. 6. Give priority to the continual expansion of services aimed at providing I assistance to Borough residents [elderly?). I Statement of Objectives, Page 7 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

7. Encourage the maintenance of existing Borough assets and public I improvements. 8. Encourage cooperative efforts with neighboring municipalities to provide services to the residents at more cost-effective rates. I 9. Participate in regional planning programs to provide stronger, more viable opportunities to the area. I 10. Develop an education process by which Borough residents can expand their awareness of Borough policies and programs. I 11. Develop riverfront potential. 12. Annually evaluate the status of the community development program and I "action" programs. Competent professional review will be necessary to assure "good" development. I haportant Comments hnz 1967 Plan The CBD and Industrial District will continue to be a dominant feature on I the landscape IF AN IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IS EMPHASIZED . . . What MUST BE accomplished IS AN ACTION PROGRAM. I Such planning elements as location and types of recreation facilities, new schools, need for different community facilities, and the capacity for fiscal I development are all integrally tied to a knowledge of the population. + AGE GROUP CONCLUSION: The increase of the two youngest age groups I between 1950 and 1960 will possibly prove to be a stabilizing influence in the Borough's population in the future. I Severe drop in 15-34 age group represents a significant negative factor in the economic base potential of the Borough. I + In general, unless there are extreme changes in the character of the population, the Borough will be gearing up for more of its older population in terms of facilities for the elderly than in building schools and other I supporting facilities for its younger population. + The built-up character of the Borough will remain essentially the same with I no substantial changes to alter the present pattern of residential development. I + There may be a number of modern apartments developed by 1980. I I Statement of Objectives, Page 8 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

+ There will be no major economic change in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area to alter or shift or have a radical impact on the population development of the Borough.

+ The child-bearing age group has decreased in proportion to total population if this trend continues, the population should continue to decrease in the I decade of 1960 to 1970.

+ The loss, or gradual displacement of a plant, such as PPG, would be of I catastrophic impact upon the Borough and, the County.

+ It is desired that all building plans for new industry, as well as for other I developments, be referred to the Planning Commission for review prior to the final decision made on construction.

I + Ford City can be the center of small urban areas in terms of service and population. I There does not exist sufficient recreational land to adequately serve the community. I I I

Statement of Objectives, Page 9 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

VlSIONS

When Borough Council initially began considering the updating of this Comprehensive Plan, several issues had arisen which required a plan that provided some alternative action to address those issues. Issues such as:

+ The loss of the PPG plant as an economic base

+ The redevelopment of the former PPG site

+ The improvements of the "Main Street" business district

+ The provision of additional social and recreation activities for the Borough's I citizens, especially the elderly + The improvement of the existing public utilities, especially the water I distribution system The lack of parking in the general business district I + The lack of "outside" funding to assist in Borough activities + The condition of structures within the Borough

+ The reuse of vacant structures

The elected officials of the Borough felt, as well as observed, the changing issues in Ford City and put in motion a project intended to gain the resident's assistance, through their volunteering to assist in completing community surveys and attending meetings; and by voicing their concerns (and praises) of existing programs, policies and conditions within the Borough.

In addition to the elected and appointed officials of Ford City Borough, several organizations within the Borough are taking an active role in the development of a plan that produces opportunities and guidelines which can be used to address the I issues identified earlier.

I The Ford City Business Association has viewed the changes within the Borough with a concerned eye and has also begun the process of developing a strategy I which will provide alternatives to keep the business district a viable, healthy place to

Visions, Page 10 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

do business, along with keeping Ford City a well-maintained, civic-minded small I town.

The Business Association believes that a viable "small town" has a number of I values which must be strengthened by municipal and/or organizational involvement. Those values include: I + Safety I + Friendliness + Strong moral values I + Quality of life + Strong work ethic I + Civic pride + Sense of community I + Small town atmosphere I The Business Association also believes that it is necessary to develop a "plan of action" which will develop programs and projects that will build upon and amplify I these values. Further, in order to facilitate any proposed plans, no matter the formulator or the goal, it will take a concerted effort by the elected officials, I Business Association, residents and other organizations within the Borough. This Comprehensive Plan mirrors the "vision statements" developed by the Business Association, and the achievement of goals established in this Plan will only be I achieved through "partnerships," between and among: I

Borough government Media I Various Borough boards and commissions County government Downtown business owners Foundations I Property owners Financial institutions School district . Civic groups Business owners Real estate organizations I Business Association Garden Club Residents (young and old) Consultants I StateFederal Government I Visions, Page 11 I Each of the goals developed in this Plan, as well as those that may be developed for other reports, will only be accomplished through the teamwork of those groups I identified above. I I I

I I I I I

I I

Visions, Page 12 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES

Due to Ford City's formation as an early industrial center, the Borough was able to develop some services for its residents that normally wouldn't be found in a rural community. I Mi~niupdOffices Present Borough business is conducted in the municipal building located at the I corner of 4th Avenue and 10th Street. The Borough's police department and volunteer fire department equipment is also housed in this facility. In addition to I the full-time office staff, which consists of two (2) clerks/secretaries and a part-time code enforcement officer, there are eight [8] other full-time employees in I public works/services. I Rlbfic Ssfetg This aspect of municipal services focuses on the primary responsibility of any municipality - that of providing for the general health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents. Ford City Borough provides an excellent public safety program to I Borough residents as can be seen in the following:

Police Protection

The current staffing of the Borough's police department consists of four [4) full-time officers and thirteen [I3) part-time police officers providing round-the-clock coverage to Borough residents. Guidelines developed by the Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs recommend one (1) police officer per one thousand [I,000) residents for comprehensive service. The force I currently has one [I) police cruiser in operation, and a second on order, with its officers located in the municipal building. Currently, the department makes up I approximately twenty-five percent (25%) of the total Borough budget.

Community Facilities and Services, Page 13 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Fire Protection I

The Borough is served by a volunteer fire company, Ford City Hose Company I No. 1, whose equipment is housed at the municipal building located at 4th Avenue and 10th Street. The company's equipment consists of three [3] I engines and one [I] rescue truck. The current roster lists thirty-five [35] active members. The Borough allocates approximately three percent [3%] of I it's budget towards the fire department.

Emergency Medical Services [EMS] I

The Ford City Hose Company No. 1 Ambulance Service, Inc., which became a I private service in 1999, now provides Emergency Medical Services to all residents in the Borough. The roster of active members is currently at I seventeen [17) with eight [a] trained and certified as EMT's [Emergency Medical Technicians] and nine (9) as paramedics. The equipment includes two I (21 ambulances one of which was donated by the Borough, with both providing advanced life support. All equipment is housed at the municipal building. I Ford City Bomugh Water Department I The Borough has provided water to its residents for over seventy (70) years as a part of its daily function through the Water Department. The water is obtained I from three [3] deep wells drilled in the southeast corner of the Borough and is stored in a reservoir that has a capacity of 1.5 million gallons, and is treated with I both chloride and fluoride before distribution. The original storage tanks, which was built in 1924 with a capacity of 35,000 gallons, was replaced in 1988 with a "high" tank with a capacity of 100,000 gallons. I

During 1994, the Department has served just over 1,600 customers, I pumping approximately 450,000 gallons per day, most of them residential. I The monthly rates for water service is billed at $10.50 per month for 3,000 gallons. For each 1,000 gallons used above this, an additional $2.07 is charged. The pricing is the same for residential and nonresidential customers. I I Communtty Facilities and Services, Page 14 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

One of the first plants constructed in Pennsylvania, the Borough's water treatment facility was built in 1924. This leads to one of the areas of concern for I Borough officials - the age of the water distribution lines. All of the lines are either I ductile or cast iron, with the "youngest" lines being over twenty-five [25]years old. Sanitarg Sewers I The Ford City Borough Municipal Sewage Disposal Authority was established to service the communities of Ford City, Ford Cliff and Manorville Boroughs and I Manor Township. In 1962, a wastewater treatment plant was constructed just north of 17th Street. The wastewater treatment plant has been expanded twice I within the past seven [7] years. In 1987-88, the treatment plant was upgraded from primary treatment to secondary treatment, and in 1991-92, the secondary I treatment was expanded.

I Manor Township has an agreement with Authority that provides treatment to sewage collected and conveyed by the Township. Manor Township has just I completed Phase 3 of its sewer line expansion program and now has 1,357 (21 not using service) customers tapped in. The agreement also provides that the Manor Township residents will be responsible for the maintenance of the lines and pump stations located within the Township. The Authority is responsible only for I the treatment of the sewage from the Township. With the new upgrade of the treatment facility, the capacity for treatment has I been increased to 2.2 MGD [million gallons per day]. The average daily flow at the treatment facility for 1994 was approximately 750,000 gallons per day, which I indicates that there is ample capacity for future tap-ins to the system. The number of future tap-ins from the Borough will be relatively few as compared to I the surrounding municipalities. The system has over nine [9] miles of sewer lines, three [3] pump stations and I three [3] overflow regulators which must be maintained. The authority has three (3) full-time personnel who are at the plant eight [8] hours per day, Monday I through Friday, and four (41 hours on Saturday and Sunday. I Community Facilities and Services, Page 15 I

One of the concerns at this time is the fact that several miles of sewer line is a 1 "combined" system , collecting sanitary sewage and stormwater. This situation is not one that positively affects the treatment capacity of the plant and should be I remedied as soon as possible. I Solid -Recycling Waste I Garbage collection for Borough residents is provided by Borough personnel , specifically three (31 persons, one [I]driver and two (21 "pickers." These personnel service the southern half of the Borough on Mondays and Tuesdays, I and the northern half on Wednesday and Thursdays. Every Friday in 1994, recyclable materials [glass, steel and bimetal cans and plastic] were collected. I Beginning in 1995, however, the recyclable collection will be bi-weekly [every other Friday]. I

As part of the recycling process, there is a drop-off center on 3rd Avenue I where Borough residents can take their newspapers.

All waste materials, both municipal and recyclable, are taken to a Tri-Valley I Sanitation Transfer station in Kittanning for disposal near New Kensington , Pennsylvania. I I Gas service is provided to the Borough by People's Natural Gas Company, and I electric service is provided by the West Penn Power Company.

Librmy I

The Ford City Public Library is a public library located at the corner of 12th I Street and 4th Avenue. This new facility was opened in 1975, formerly the site of the First Baptist Church and later, the Ford City Community Center. A fire I destroyed the original structure in early 1974 and the current library building was constructed in 1975. I I Community Facilities and Services, Page 16 I 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 The library began in 1946 in the basement of the former elementary school with a book collection of approximately 4,000 and a circulation of 19,150 among I its 1,008 members.

I Today, the library boosts a collection of over 30,000 catalogued volumes, with approximately 2,500 paperback books available. In addition, the library I subscribes to fiftytwo (52) magazines and periodicals as well as two (2) newspapers, the Pittsburah Post-Gazette and the Kittanning Leader Times.

I Memberships with the library today number well over 5,000. Adult memberships number about 4,300, with juvenile members numbering over I 1,100. The cost of membership for non-Borough residents is $1 5.00 while there I is no fee for Borough residents. Operation

1 The library is open thirty-five (35)hours a week, with the hours of operation being 1 to 8 p.m. during the school year and 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. during the I summer months. The staff consists of two (2) full-time employees and the use of twelve [I2) volunteers. Additional volunteers are used for the story hour I sessions for the preschoolers. I Finances In 1994, the Borough assisted the library's operation by providing $1,650.00 per month for salaries and expenses. The library also received a grant from the State in the amount of approximately $6,000.00.Additional funding comes from the "Excellence Foundation," a merchants association from East Franklin Township which donates money to three (3) local libraries for the purchase of books, I equipment and furniture. As a supplement to these sources of income, fines of I $. 10 per day are charged. The monthly budget for purchasing books has been set between $50-$100 per month. However, due to rising operational costs, most new books have I been acquired through memorial donations at a cost of $15.00 per memorial. I Community Facilities and Services, Page 17 FORD CRY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Services I

One of the most important alliances the Ford City Public Library has made is I that of becoming a participating member of the New Castle Library Center. Through this participation, Ford City receives the services of a book van delivery I twice per week [Monday and Thursday); inter-library assistance [at no charge) and telephone assistance [expenses reimbursed). I As mentioned earlier, the library provides several services to local residents, including preschool story hour which includes crafts and other activities for the I children , job market information and a reference resource center. I Health Can Facilities

The Borough does not have a hospital located within its borders, but is served I by the Armstrong County Memorial Hospital, located in North Buffalo Township, approximately four [4] miles away. I

The Borough is serviced by several physicians and dentists within its borders, I including three (3) doctors and three [3] dentists. There are no clinics located within the Borough. I Educational opportanities I I Ford City Borough is one of a dwindling number of communities that have the opportunity to send their children to a parochial school. Ford City Catholic School I has been in existence since a 1973 merger of Holy Trinity and St. Mary's Catholic schools and is located on 4th Avenue. I Ford City Catholic provides education for children in pre-school through the 6th grade. During the past five [5] school years, enrollment has averaged one I hundred and seventy-four [I74) students, Enrollment is completed during the late spring and summer preceding the school year. The enrollment figures have I I Community Facilities and Services, Page 18 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 steadily increased since 1990, but come nowhere near the enrollment figures of I the late 60s and early 70s of six hundred [600]students. The school does not complete any projected enrollments due to the instability of the students attendance from school year to school year. Ford City Catholic I School provides an alternative for those families who feel that public class sizes I and/or curriculum is unsatisfactory. The following chart breaks down the enrollment and class size figures for the I past five (51 school years: I Ford City Catholic School Emvhent

II Table #I II I School Pre- K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Year /School1 // ~~ I I I ‘199&91 27 16 18 18 17 14 18 11 I 1991-92 44 19 17 19 14 17 13 17 160 I 1992-93 60 29 22 17

1993-94 53 26 I 26 I 19 16 18 12 15 185 I 111994-951 60 i 29 I 24 I 23 20 15 16 13 200 I RlbliC Ford City Borough belongs to the Armstrong School District which I encompasses most of the northern Armstrong County and two [2] municipalities each from Clarion and Indiana Counties. The Armstrong School District consists I of thirteen [I31 elementary schools, one middle school [Kittanning] and six (61 high schools [five [5] since the closing of East Brady in 1993).

I Ford City has been able to retain its high school facility, while the elementary school has been relocated to Manor Township. The enrollment at both school has I remained fairly stable throughout the period and is projected to flux gently over the I next four [4] years. I Community Facilities and Services, Page 19 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I I I Enrollment Projected 92-93 I 93-94 I 94-95 95-96 I 96-97 I 97-98 I 98-99 I Lenape Elementary 888 889 860 861 852 852 834 Ford City High School 742 751 766 793 796 815 831 I Change from 199495 to 1998-99 Lenape Elementary -2 6 -3% Ford City High School 65 +8.5% I

The current design of the existing facilities is capable of handling the proposed I increase at the high school level, thus no changes or expansions are anticipated. I Lenape Vo-Tech

Lenape Vo-Tech services the entire Armstrong County population, and has I been rated as one of the "strongest" vocational-technical schools in the region. The enrollment for the 199495 school year was four hundred and twenty (420) I students, sixty (60) of which came from the Ford City School District (1 4%). I I I 1 I I I I Community Facilities and Services, Page 20 I

FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

HOUSING

Housing Conditions

In January of 1995, a windshield survey of the structural conditions of the Borough was conducted. A detailed analysis of the conditions was not undertaken due to the amount of time necessary to complete such a task. However, in completing such a survey of the Borough, it is possible to identify areas of the Borough where conditions of deteriorating housing exists.

The quality of housing is generally good. The field survey, based on a "windshield view" shows that approximately two percent (2%) of the units are in poor condition, while about twenty percent [20%] of the structures are considered to be fair.

The existence of deteriorated housing in the Borough detracts from the economic well-being and leads to the perception that the Borough is either, not concerned with the deterioration of its facilities, or is not capable of dealing with such deterioration.

On the other side of the coin, the preservation of its housing stock should be a major component of the Borough's improvement program. By preserving its housing stock, the Borough indicates its interest in providing a healthy, viable community for its residents. The development of a rehabilitation program for its residential structures, alona with the development and enforcement of building and property codes, should be a part of each Borough Council's goal development.

Older settlements, as Ford City Borough is considered, face the fact that older structures present additional problems in maintenance and upkeep due to their age. Additionally, older structures are much more difficult to rehabilitate. This fact also points to the need of a maintenance program for all structures within the Borough.

In completing the survey of structures, it is quite evident that a majority of those homes needing extensive rehabilitation are over forty (40) years old.

Housing, Page 21 I

Structurd Conditions I

Residentid I There is evidence of limited deterioration and blighting conditions in Ford City. I There are specific "pockets" of substandard housing, with isolated structures located throughout the Borough. The most effective step to erase blight would be I through a code enforcement program. Such a program can, and should, be tailored to the Borough's needs. The principal objective of such a program would be to maintain the stability of the community and to stay the force of blight before I more drastic action, such as condemnation, becomes necessary. The expected life of all homes and commercial establishments would be extended through an I actively-managed code enforcement program. 1 I The field survey indicates that a greater percentage of Ford City Borough's nonresidential buildings are in need of rehabilitation, and that a few properties exist which appear to be beyond rehabilitation. Those properties include the I former lumber yard on Third Avenue and the AMCO property in the industrial district. Several other nonresidential properties, many of which are located in the 1 Central Business District, are showing signs of deterioration, although with the proper rehabilitation work, they can be salvaged. I Overall , the Borough's nonresidential structures provide more potential target I areas for rehabilitation programs. Any rehabilitation program must be accompanied by code enforcement to ensure that improvements are made 1 according to Borough standards.

Code enforcement, in itself, is not enough to conserve property values. It is I only a part of an overall program aimed at maintaining housing values. Deterioration of homes is not just a matter of age, but also of design and I construction. If a home was poorly designed and built, rehabilitation may not be 8

Housing, Page 22 I I 1 FORD CrrY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 economically feasible. However, if it can be determined to be worthwhile, the rehabilitation can be the answer to rejuvenating older structures and properties. I Age ofHousing

I I Table #3 Year Built Number Percent of Total 11 I 1991-1994 4 1989-1990 10 I 1985-1988 12 0.7 II 1980-1 984 17 1 II I 1970-1 979 15 1960-1 969 167 Before 1960 1,480 86.8 I Total 1,705* 100

I *Includes homes built after 1990 Census

I According to the 1990 census, substandard units are those which are lacking complete plumbing facilities. Those statistics indicated that all occupied housing I units, both Owner and renter, have complete plumbing facilities with only eight (81 units, total , lacking plumbing facilities. These statistics show that over ninety-nine percent [99%] of 4 housing units in the Borough have adequate plumbing I facilities.

1 Housing Chactenktics

1 This section presents a description of the Borough's housing supply. Housing data was obtained from available sources, including the 1990 U.S. Census. I The data reviewed indicates that the housing inventory in Ford City has declined along with the population, with most of the decline being in two-family and I multi-family units. In 1960, the Census indicated that there were 1,786 housing units in the Borough. That number dropped to 1,727 in 1980, a 3.3% drop. I The 1990 Census results show a further decline of available units to 1,701 , a I decrease of 1.5%. Over the three decades, the total number of housing units Housing, Page 23 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I dropped by 85 in number and 4.8%. Essentially, this decline was a natural I "weeding-out" of the housing stock, most of which was older, deteriorating housing. I Housing Charactendcs I Table #4 I I I I I I I I

Table #5 I 1 1960 I 1980 1990 I 1,786 I 1,727 I 1,701 I Occupancy and Taure I The 1990 Census estimated 1,036 owner-occupied housing units and 525 renter-occupied units. Of the owner-occupied units, 465, or almost 45% have I been occupied by the present owner since 1959 or earlier, which indicates a fairly stable community. About 5.3% of the current homeowners have moved into their I present homes in the year prior to the 1990 Census. These points are I Housing, Page 24 I 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I somewhat surprising when you take into consideration the fact that the Borough's major employer, PPG Industries, has been in decline during the past six (6) years I and has since closed its doors.

Tenure data for rental units showed a different pattern, almost exactly opposite I that of the owner-occupied units. Only 5.7% have moved into their homes before 1959 while, during the five (51 year period 1985-1990, almost 58% of the rental I units were occupied.

I Year Moved into Housing Unit

I Table #6 Number Percentage Year Owner Renter Owner Renter 1 1989-1990 55 137 5.3 26.1 1985-1988 118 167 11.4 31.8 I 198D1984 72 76 6.9 14.5 1970-1979 172 53 16.6 10.1 1 1960-1969 154 62 14.9 11.8 Before 1969 465 30 44.9 5.7 I Total 1,036 525 100 100 I Earlier statistics identify the trend in housing units during the past thirty [30] 1 years as a declining one. According to census statistics, the Borough has lost 85 housing units, a drop of 4.8% over that time span. In reviewing the ownership I statistics, the percentage of owner-occupied units fell-off at about the same rate I (4.1%) between 1960 and 1990. Over that same time span, the number of renteroccupied units has declined by I 54 units (9.3%). The percentage of renteroccupied units dropped by 1.5% over the time period. I I Housing, Page 25 1 I

Probably the most telling statistic of the ownership trend during the time span I is the increase of vacant units in the Borough. In 1960, the census identified 46 vacant units, 2.6% of the total number of units. By 1990, these numbers had I increased to 140 units and 8.2% of the total number of units, an increase of just over 204%. I Occupation Characten'stics I II Table #7 I Characteristics 1960 [%) 1980 [%I 1990 [%) Total Housing Units 1,786 1,727 1,701 Owner-Occupied 1,161 (6.5) 1,079[62.51 1,036[60.9] I Renter-Occupied 579 (32.4) 577 (33.4) 525 (30.91 Vacant 46 (2.6) 71 (4.11 140 [8.2] I

Tgpe ofHoushzg UN~S 1

The types of housing existing in the Borough today are those type that you I would expect in an older, developed community-single family, two-family [duplexesJ and multi-family. According to the Census Bureau, no mobile homes were I counted in the Borough as housing units during 1990.

Two-family homes, or duplexes, play a major role in housing Borough residents, I with almost 8% of the total housing units being contained in two-family structures. Most of these units were built during the 1930s and 40's. I Another statistic which bear out early impressions is that of single family I dwellings. In Ford City, single-family dwelling units make up over 81% of the total housing stock, while multi-family units (3 or more) make up 12% of the total. I One item which does appear to be an anomaly to recent trends is the fact that the number of single-family units rose by 57 units between 1980 and 1990. I I I Housing, Page 26 I 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

I MiiWamily Development

I Mature communities face a growing need for dwelling units other than single family structures, and with this, pressure to find adequate space for the I placement of multi-family structures. The reason for this pressure is due to the aging of the population and the fact that, being a mature, built-out community, I there is a lack of available land on which to place such a structure. I Number of Housing Units in the Sfructure 1 I 8

I Other 0 0 9 0.5 - I Total 1,727 100 1,701 100 I Eouseholds During the past two (2) decades, it has become quite "normal" for municipal I statistics to indicate a drop in the average household size, due to an increase in the number of available housing units within the municipality. However, in Ford I City, the main reason for the decline in the average household size has been due to the natural aging process and the outmigration of its citizens, not the increase I of available housing units. I I Housing, Page 27 I c I I

Households by Size I

II Table #9 II I ## of Persons 1980 % 1990 % 80-90 % Change 1 496 29.8 552 35.4 + 11.3 I t I 2 582 35 518 33.2 - 11.0 3 282 16.9 252 16.1 - 10.6 I I I I 4 or more I 305 I 18.3 I 239 I 15.3 I -21.6 11 I I I I I Total) 1.665 I 100 I 1.561 I 100 I -6.2 ll I As the above chart illustrates, the Borough experienced both an increase of I single-person households, as well as, a decrease of over 100 households during the past decade which relates directly to the decline in the average household size. I

Average Household Size I

I Table #IO II I II I 1960 I 1980 I 1990 11 ~~ I A review of the Borough's permit records indicate that permits for only four (4) new homes were issued during the period of 1990 through 1994. I vacancy I The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] defines a fluid I housing market as one with a 4 to 8 percent vacancy rate. A "tight" housing market would fall below 4 percent, while rates above 8 percent represent a I market that is over-saturated with available units. I I Housing, Page 28 I 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I Vacancy Rates I 1980 1990 %change I Total Housing Units 1,727 1,701 - 1.5 llvscan t units I 71 I 140 I +97.2 11 ~ I Percentage 4.1 8.2 - I Ford City's 8.2 vacancy rate in 1990 indicates a "soft" market. This market condition parallels that of Armstrong County's, who's rate of vacancy was 10.0.

I Housing Values

I The housing values in the Borough have risen during the past decade and a half due mainly to inflation factors. Regionally the values in Ford City compare I equitably with those in other Boroughs, however, lay behind values in the I Townships. Table #I2 Median Housing Value I 11 1980 I 1990 I %change 11 I 11 $25,700 I $35,200 I +29.96% )I I I

I Housing, Page 29 1 FORD CilY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Table #I3 I Ford Citv Borouah I Armstrona Countv Housing Value # of units % # of units % I 1OD1 49,000 8 6.8 503 3.2 150 and over 0 0 146 0.9 Total 961 100 15,653 100 I ((MedianValue I $35,200 I $44,100 II ~ ~~ IlMedien Year Structure I 1939 r- 1951 It I

Housing values in the Borough generally reflect the age of the housing units. I The 1990 median housing value in Ford City is approximately $35,200 just about $9,000 less than the County-wide median. The median year of housing starts in I the Borough is twelve (12) years older than that of the housing throughout the County. The average age of the housing in Ford City Borough parallels that of the I other Boroughs in the area and indicated that these population centers were the first to be settled d developed in the region. I The values of housing in the Borough represent, statistically, all of the Boroughs in the area. Over 27% (27.6%) of the housing in Ford City in valued at I less than $25,000. In Armstrong County, only 17.5% of housing is valued under $25,000. I In the Borough, the largest category is between [$30,000 - $44,000, I representing 37.3% of the units [County-wide - 26.4%). County figures indicate that its largest category is between $45,000 - $74,000, at 35.3% [Borough - 22.6%). The most telling statistic, which can also be an indicator of the level of I market activity in an area, is the higher housing values. In Ford City Borough, the percentage of housing units with a value over $75,000 is 2.4%! County-wide, this I percentage jumps to over 13% [I3.1 %]! I 1 I I Housing, Page 30 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I Housing Demand

I Household Growth - See Household Statistics

I Replacement Units - Due to the fact that the housing market is very "soft" at this time, there is no shortage of homes/units available as replacements for I existing homeowners/renters. Vacancies - Of the one hundred and forty (140) housing units vacant in the I Borough, over fifty percent [50%), eighty (80)are available for rent or sale to prospective home purchaserdrenters. At the county level, of 3,448 vacant 1 housing units, only twenty-three percent (23%) or seven hundred and eight one 1 (781)are available for rent or sale. I Ford City Borough faces housing "problems" that are common with other 1 mature communities, Problems such as: 1. Age of existing housing. I 2. Evidence of some deteriorating housing. 3. Limited area for new housing. 1 4. A shift in the type of housing units needed.

How the Borough proposes to address these "problems" will be described in I the Action Plan.

I A summary of the physical, land use and structural features discussed is 1 shown on the accompanying Development Factors Map. I I 1 Housing, Page 31 I

I

I POPULATION

1 The analysis of population characteristics and population estimates are major factors in the planning process for a community. the characteristics of the 1 Borough residents will significantly impact the formulation of policies and recommendations during the comprehensive planning process, as well as, the I enactment of programs aimed at implementing the development goals. I Age Distribution It Table #I4 II I # change I %change )I II I 1960 I 1980 1 1990 60-90 I 80-90 1 60-90 I 80-90 11 I /\under 15 I 1,523 I 605 I 526 -997 -79 -65.46 -13.05 II 15-24 I 538 I 613 I 345 -193 -268 35.87 -43.71 I 1/25-34 I 603 I 490 I 539 -64 I 49 I -10.61 I 10 11 1\35-44 I 923 I 263 I 377 -596 I 114 I -64.57 I 43.34 11 I I45-54 1 43; 1 48.32 1 -26.41 1 55-64 1 530718 1 i:; 1 zi -28.67 -53.15 65 6 over 605 774 975 61.15 25.96 I I Total I 5,440 I 3,923 I 3,413 -2,027 I -510 1-37.26 I -13 11

Age Distribution -Percentage

I1 Table #I5 II II I 1960 I 1980 I 1990 11 under 15 28 15.4 1 I5-24 9.9 15.6 10.1 (1 25-34 I 11.1 I 12.5 I 15.8 11

1145-54 I 13.2 I 9.5 I 8 II 1155-64 I 9.7 I 20.6 I 11.1 11 165 & over 11.1 19.7 28.6

Population, Page 32 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

The population characteristics of Ford City Borough are those of a mature I community, while losing its young, viable residents. I Popalation Total 1940-1990 I I I The 1990 population decreased by five hundred and ten (510) residents, or a thirteen percent (13%) drop from 1980. The forecasted population totals I propose a continued decrease in the Borough's population through the year 2015. In the Borough's original comprehensive plan, completed in 1967, the I projected population figure for 1980 was between 5,300 and 5,800. The actual figure from the 1980 Census was 3,923. The major factor in this differential was I the economic downtown which generated a shift in manufacturing jobs from the "industrial" northeast of the United States, to the "Sun Belt" and other regions. I Future projections of various agencies are not encouraging due, in most part, to the decline in the economy of the area and the fact that the population has I declined over thirty-seven percent (37%) since 1960.

1990Age/Sex Distribution 1

II Table #I7 I II I Male I Female I II WE 0 Sub WB I under 5 82 0 0 82 80 28 0 108 190 5-1% 181 0 0 181 i:: 1 0" 1 i 1155 1336 1 I 1 15-24 170 0 11 181 164 345 249 26 275 539 I

176 176 202 I 1 Population, Page 33 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I Male Female I 656over 366 30 0 396 550 29 0 0 579 Total 1,523 70 11 1,604 1.726 83 0 1,809 3.413 I I I The table above indicates that the Borough's male/female distribution is fairly well-balanced throughout all age groups except for the "65 and over", indicating a I good population stabilization.

I The age distribution within Ford City Borough indicates that the average age is just over forty-two years of age. This fact, in itself, indicates that the population 1 that is able to move away, be it for employment reasons, family decisions, or other factors, is doing so, while those for whom the economic downturn did not I affect, or did not have the means to move, remain in the Borough. 1 Nderof FamiLies Table #I8 I 1' 1960 I 1980 1990 I # chanae I %change I 11 2,802 I 2,069 I 1,809 I -997 I -35.88% 11 1930 Population peak 6,212 I 1990 Population 3,413 Difference -2,799 -45.06 I1 I' In the thirty [30)year time period between 1960 and 1990, every age group except the "65 and over'' group declined by an average of over forty-two percent I [42%)! The "65 and over'' age group was the only group that experienced an I increase, and that was just over sixtyone percent [61%). I Population, Page 34 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PIAN I

During the 1980-1990 decade, there was an increase in the 25-34, 35-44, 1 and 65 and over age groups. The 25-44 age group grew as a percentage of the total from 19.2% to 26.8%. This group includes the young segment of the I population, which, to a large extent, comprises the "stable family," child-bearing group, the local labor force and the group most frequently engaged in home I buying. This group is an asset to the Borough. I The 45-64 age group experienced the greatest decline, from 30.1% in 1980, to 19.1% in 1990, which could be directly related to the economic slow down in I the region and the shut down of the Pittsburgh Plate and Glass (PPG] plant.

The "65 and over" age group now constitutes the largest age group in the I Borough, and, in general, this age group will continue to remain the largest age grouping unless there should occur a stimulus that regenerates interest in the 1 young adult and young-married age groups. I These older age groups are more stable and less "mobile" than their younger counterparts and are more socially "tied" to the community by family and through involvement in various associations. However, their economic impact is declining I since the "buying power'' is generally limited and their home building or buying is minimal. I

The makeup of the overall population nationwide, including the Borough as I noted previously, is growing older, while the birth rate is declining which means that FEWER people will be responsible for the care and housing for a LARGER I number of people. This trend is evidenced in the Borough through the recent construction of elderly housing units. I Another outcome of an aging population is the increase of leisure time," in which that sector of the Borough's residents have the opportunity to invest more I time in social and recreational activities. Thus, the need to focus on expanding and upgrading recreational programs and facilities within the Borough especially I for the older population. I I Population, Page 35 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I Population Forecast

I Table #32 (Age Distribution] can be used as a guide in developing conclusions regarding the future population of Ford City: I 1. The pre-school (under 5) and prime school enrollment (5-14) age groups have steadily declined during the past three (3) decades. I 2. The number of females in the 'prime" child-bearing age bracket (15-34) has declined by over seventeen percent (17%), Overall, this age group has also decreased I dramatically. 3. The female age group 1544 totaled 1,085 in 1960. In 1980, this number dropped to 679. And in 1990, this number dropped even further, to 630,a number that is I less than half of what it was in 1950. 4. The total population has declined by over 2,000 persons since 1960 (-37+%)and by I 510 persons since 1980 (-13%). I In addition to the statistics identified above, the loss of one of the Borough's primary employers, PPG, also has had a negative impact on the population base.

I Because of the many factors described above, the population of Ford City Borough is expected to continue its downward movement through the year 2000 I and beyond. With a thirty (30)year annual decline of 1.24% (the ten year annual rate of decline is 1.3%], a straight-line projection will result in a year 2000 i population of under 3,000 persons (2,9691. Using the same parameter, the I 2010 population would be 2,583. One factor which could have a significant impact on the future population within the Borough is the development, or lack thereof, of the former PPG site. Should I Borough officials and the property owner be able to successfully market and develop the property under current regulations, the property could generate a I large number of residential units, as well as commercial opportunities. I I We have forecast a continued downward trend of the population in the Borough through the next decade. While the Borough population declines, that of I Population, Page 36 I I the surrounding townships will grow at a relatively slow pace. The age group I characteristics and the total population have a direct bearing upon the programs and facilities provided by the Borough in the future. The future residents and I elected officials of Ford City have the responsibility of reviewing and revising this plan to address the current needs within the Borough. I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 Population, Page 37 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME

Labor Force Participation

The 1990 U.S. Census statistics indicated that a total of 1,221 persons sixteen [I61 years old or over, were employed in the Borough. Unemployment was estimated at ten percent [IO%] which was higher than the County figures (8.2%) and the Commonwealth [6.6%).

I The trend for employment within the Borough has been one of steady decline through the past decade and a half. The 1980 Census estimated a total work force of 1,417 which related to a 13.8% decline in employment figures between 1980 and 1990. With the closing of the PPG plant in 1993, another three I hundred and twenty-six [326] persons became unemployed. Obviously, not all of these persons resided in the Borough, but the closing indicates a continuance of I the documented trend in employment figures. I Ahdustby and Occupation Table #I9 presents the distribution of employed persons, by industry, in Ford City in 1980 and 1990. The statistics clearly show the decline in importance of manufacturing jobs in the Borough, which coincides with the decline of such jobs in the County, southwestern Pennsylvania and the entire northeast portion of the United States.

The figures in Table #I9 also demonstrate the economic "slowdown" in the region in areas related to manufacturing, for example, a decline of over fifty four percent [54%] in mining jobs and a twenty four percent [24%) decrease in construction jobs.

Another area of impact, both on the employment numbers, as well as the education services, was the closing of the former public elementary school and a parochial school. This attributed to a loss of eighty two (82) jobs, a decrease of almost fifty six percent (56%).

Employment and Income, Page 38 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Those areas which have become the employment "leaders" in the service-type I businesses and the wholesale and retail sales areas. The services sector has increased by just over twenty four percent (24%). The wholesale and retail sales I industries have grown by almost thirteen percent (1 3%). I EiupIopent by hdustty I Table #I9 1980 1990 I I lndustrv Number I % Number % %change lIAgriculture/Mining 17015 32 2.6 -54.3 Construction 50 3.5 38 3.1 -24 I Trans. Util. Comm 72 5.1 80 6.6 11.1 43 I 3.5 I 53.6 I Retail 255 18 276 22.6 8.2 Fin, Ins, Real Estate 36 2.5 51 4.2 41.7 I Public Administration 69 4.9 31 2.5 -55.1 Education Services 149 10.5 67 5.5 -55 Other Services 216 15.2 262 21.5 21.3 I Durable Manufact. 394 27.8 305 25 -22.6 Nondurable Manufact. 78 5.5 36 2.9 -53.8 I 11 Total I 1,417 I 100 I 1,221 I 100 I -13.8 I llTotal Manufacturing I 472 I 33.3 I 341 I 28 I -27.8 I hcome

The 1990 Census listed the median household income for Ford City Borough I residents in 1989 as $19,248.00. The 1979 income figure, adjusted to 1989 economic levels, as $22,421.OO. A comparison of the figures shows a drop of I over fourteen percent (14%). As with the statistics provided in other sections of this report, these income statistics indicate the economic downturn in the I Borough. The County ratio mirrored Ford City's movement, by dropping I I Employment and Income, Page 39 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PIAN

approximately 14.7% in median income from 1979 to 1989 (with the 1979 figure adjusted to 1989 levels.]

In 1990, the Borough's poverty level was identified at just over eleven percent (1 1.1%). This compared favorably to the County's level of 12.7%, and matched I that of the Commonwealth at 11.1 %. I

I Ford City Borough, and Armstrong County as well, was "financially solvent" due to the marketing and employment strengths of the Eljer Plumbing and Pittsburgh I Plate and Glass manufacturing plants located in the Borough. At their "high point," employment of over three thousand (3,000]persons was the standard, with the two companies providing a majority of the tax base for the Borough and a I large share of the County's.

I In terms of Assessed Value, the ten (10) year trend has been a general decline I with two small spikes due to new commercial development. The following chart graphically illustrate the trend:

Chart #I

Assessed Value

Employment and Income, Page 40 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PIAN I

The opening of the Millwood Apartments (a senior housing complex) in 1996, I will provide another "spike" in the assessment values of the Borough, but will not provide much of an impact on the revenues to be collected by the Borough. I

Another indicator of the financial condition of a municipality is the per capia 1 revenues and expenditures within the municipality. When the revenues are greater than the expenditure, obviously, the municipality is financially solvent and is I able to provide services and programs without additional burden on the residents. However, when the expenditures outnumber the revenues, it is an indication that the municipality is not above to provide more than the basic services, and at this I level, some of those basic services may be "cut back." I For the latest period in which statistics are available, 1986-1992, the Borough has "crossed-over" from being able to provide a variety of services and I maintenance programs, to being able to provide only the basic services. Chart #2 illustrates the recent changes in the revenues and expenditures per capita, in the I Borough. The trend is assumed to be essentially the same for the years 1993 and 1994. I Pm Capita Revenues & Eiqenses I Chart #2 I Per Capita Revenue and Expenses I $700

$600 Expenses 1 $500 I $400

$300 I I I Employment and Income, Page 41 I 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I Income

I Household income figures can also give you a picture of the economic well-being of a community and its residents, identifying those areas which have I been able to maintain (or even grow] employment figures and keep pace with inflation. A comparison of the most recent income figures for Ford City Borough I indicates what you would expect - the fact that the median income of its residents, although it has increased by over thirtynine percent (39%) from 1979 to 1989, I has not bee able to keep pace with the rate of inflation. In fact, the income figures show a decrease in the median family levels when the 1979 figures are adjusted for inflation. The following table illustrates the income levels and changes I between 1979 and 1989 statistics:

1 Household Income I 1979 1989 I # % # % Under $5,000 319 19.2 118 5,000 to 9,999 304 18.3 206 13.2

~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ I 10,000 to 14,999 261 15.7 262 16.8 15,000 to 19,999 359 21.6 231 14.8 I 20,000 to 29,999 303 18.2 299 30,000 to 39,999 66 3.9 226 14.5 ~I 1k.000to49.999 I 45 I 2.7 I 110 I 7 11 50,000 6 over 8 0.5 111 7.1 Total 1,665 100.1" 1,563 100 I Median Income $13,840 $19,248 1979 Median I Income expressed in $22,241 1989 $ I I I Employment and Income, Page 42 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Even though the average income has increased dramatically over the Isyear I period, the rate of inflation has effectively curtailed any major increase in the "buying power" of Borough residents. I Empplogent 1 1990 Census figures for "employment by occupation'' and "employment by industry" will not illustrate the drastic effect of the closing of the PPG plant and I site. The figures indicate a drop in employment of almost fourteen percent (1 4%) and a decline of twenty-eight percent (28%) in manufacturing jobs. And this I without the closing of PPG! I Emplopuent by Occupation I Table #21 II [Workers Am 16 & Over] I

IIProfessionalflechnical I 129 I 9.1 190 I 15.6 + 47.3 1 ___~~____ I Managers 71 5 55 4.5 -22.5 11 Clerical 193 13.6 167 13.7 I Sales 132 9.3 153 12.5 JCraftsman I 196 13.8 I 178 1 14.6 -9.2 11 ~~ ~ I ~ ~ I Service 239 16.9 177 14.5 Operators/Laborers/AgricuI 457 32.3 301 24.7 - 34.1 ture 1 Total I 1,417 I 100 I 1,221 I 100.1"

*Due to rounding I I I I I Employment and Income, Page 43 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

EmpZopnent by Industry

Table #22

I I I IlPublic Administration I 69 I 4.9 I 31 1 2.5 I -55.1 1 Education Services 149 10.5 67 5.5 - 55.0 Other Services 216 15.2 262 21.5 - 22.6 I (IDurable Manufacturing I 394 I 27.8 I 305 I 25 I -22.6 Nondurable Manufacturing 78 5.5 36 2.9 - 53.8 Total 1,417 100 1,221 100 - 13.8 1 - I

1980 1990 % change # % # % Total nonmanufacturing 945 66.7 880 72.1 + 6.87 employment Total manufacturing 472 33.3 341 27.9 -27.75 I employment The percentage of the total work force employed in manufacturing industries I also declined during the 1U-year period. This trend has continued into the mid-90s with the closing of the PPG site. It appears however, that this trend may I be "leveling-offl with the Eljer Company remaining a major industrial employer, even discussing the possible expansion of the site. 1 Employment and Income, Page 44 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Labor Force I

According to the 1990 Census, the total labor force in Ford City Borough was I 1,357 persons, which translates into a ten percent (IO%] unemployment rate, which was among the highest in the region and was somewhat higher than the I 8.2% rate of the County.

During the decade of the 199Os, the labor force appears to be "shrinking" due I to the aging of the population and out-migration from the County. I The major employers of Ford City (those employing more than 50 persons] are relatively few. They include: I Eljer Plumbing 700 School District 70 I Klingensmith's Retail Establishments 300+ I As can be seen with the closing of the PPG plant, without having a variety of I employment opportunities, the cut-back or closing of an employer can have a major impact on the financial viability of the Borough. I In general, the Borough's overall economic condition was influenced greatly by the manufacturing sector. This condition will continue into the next century, with a I slow movement towards increased dependence on the non-manufacturing sector for economic strength. I Retail I Retail statistics over the past several years indicate a slight decline in the I number of establishments and employees during the period of 1987 through 1992; however, during the same time period, retail sales increased by almost thirty-nine percent [39%]! This indicates that those establishments that have I remained in the Borough have been able to expand their services beyond the Borough limits. Table #24 indicates the above-mentioned statistics. I I Employment and Income, Page 45 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

1 1,987 1,992 I %change IlPaid retail employees 1 299 I 292 I -2.3 11 # of retail establishments I 44 38 13.6 - Total Sales $19,496* $27,033* 38.7 I

I Ford City has a very active Business Association that is concerned with preserving the existing businesses and rehabilitating and upgrading the structures I and physical improvements of the downtown business district. The Association has developed a "Vision Statement" expressing its idea as to how the downtown should appear in 1999. Further, the Association has also developed a list of 1 activities which it feels are necessary to meet the Vision Statement.

I In an effort to increase the communication between the Association and the Borough elected officials, these activities have been included in this document. It 1 has been determined that the planning efforts should be joined in order to open the communication network between the groups and to gain the necessary 'I impetus to see them carried out. Many of the activities identified by the I Association have also been listed as objectives by Borough Council.

I The Vision Statement of the Ford City Business and Professional Association is I as follows: 'Downtown Ford City is a kiendly, bustling and eye-appeahg business I and services hub increasing4 used by residents and others from the immedate surrounding area. Building facades are attractive and inviting. 1 Sidewalks are in good condtion and there is pleasant landscaping. Parking is adequate and convenient. A diverse mix of retail business, both I convenience and specialty, services and community activities bring people downtown. The revitallied downtown is increasing the desirableness of the 1 whole community. New employment opportunities are opening up, young I Employment and Income, Page 46 I I

couples are beginning to buy houses here and more people are seeing Ford I

City as a great place to live, work and visit. 'I I This statement contains several items which have been discussed by the various boards and commission of the Borough. The need to coordinate activities among all the groups is essential. I

The plan developed by the Association included the following strengths of the I Borough and downtown area in particular: I Physical environment + downtown buildings have good fronts, readily available for restoration 1 + downtown is relatively compact and flat + a possible focus point exists [at the end of Ford Street) 1 + parking is available downtown for workers and customers; enforcement of parking areas is increasing I Available Buisness/Attractions I + downtown includes a variety of specialty shops downtown offers personal services (doctors, dentists, banks) 1 + downtown offers a variety of convenience businesses + downtown offers several non-business attractions that attract people I regularly

Events I

+ the Park offers a variety of events throughout the year which attract a large population from the area I + strong business and professional organization; provides cooperative advertising of activities and promotions I The FCBPA has also developed improvement "action steps" aimed at completing physical improvements; providing additional services; improving I cooperation between owners and Borough officials; and improving the customer base. In several areas, the proposed "action steps" correlate with Borough goals I and objectives. Those steps that can be included as part of this plan are located I Employment and Income, Page 47 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I in the Land Use Plan section, identified as goals and objectives under "the

Economy.'I I Fiscal Analysis

I In Pennsylvania, property tax revenues remain the prime revenue producer for local municipalities, with the earned income tax [EIT) generally being the second I largest revenue producer. This has also been true in Ford City Borough. And, as you would expect, due to the recent property assessment changes, the trend for I income from property taxes is one of decline. Chart #3

I Real Estate Tax Revenue

I $310.000

$300.000

I $290,000

$280.000 I $270,000 $260.000 I $250.000 ' I *Budgeted In 1991 , Ford City has approximately $1,476,250 in exempt real esate. The I trend is very similar with the Earned Income Tax [EIT) for the Borough. With the closing of the PPG plant and the loss of several retail establishments, the Chart I #4 shows an even sharper decline. I I 1 I Employment and Income, Page 48 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PIAN I

Chart #4 I

Earned Income Tax Revenues I $105,000 I I I I I I

*Budgeted 1 The decline in the total assessed valuation of properties and the loss of I employment has forced the Borough to raise taxes and to also reduce, or at least delay, some services completed on an annual basis. For example, street I maintenance now consists of a program of "pot hole patching" in the spring of each year with no program of street repaving. I The real estate tax revenues have declined during the study period about 16.6% while the earned income tax revenues have dropped 45%. I The total taxes collected by the Borough through the period has, obviously, I experienced a decline as well; resulting in a rise in the tax rate and a reduction in the level of services. 1 I Ford City Borough collects a variety of taxes which are permitted by the Borough Code, some of which are not collected by other communities. The type 1 of tax collected and the millage or rate is as follows: I I Employment and Income, Page 49 I I FORD CrrY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PIAN I Tax Rate I School ...... , ...... 59 mills ______~~~ ~~~ County (real estate) ...... 25 mills I County (debt) ...... ; ...... 4 mills Borough (real estate) ...... 25 mills Borough (special, e.g. street lights, fire) ...... 4 mills Occupational privilege ...... $1 0.00 Per capita ...... $1 0.00 Business privilege ...... % of gross sales I Real estate transfer ...... '/2 to Boroughfh to School District

I Total taxes collected in the Borough have declined during most of the study period, while demand for services and costs continued to rise. With these I conditions in existence, the options to the Borough are quite limited; raise taxes, cut services or both. In 1992, the Borough taxes were increased by 2 mills, and several departments had their budgets reduced.

Chart #5 I Total Taxes Collected $480,000 I $470,000 $460,000 \ A

$450,000

$440.000

$430,000 I , I , 4 4 I ,I

Employment and Income, Page 50 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

The following tables identify the taxes collected, the trends of those taxes, and I how the monies are expended. As you can see from the total collected taxes, there has been a drop of approximately six percent [6%] in the total amount I collected during the period of study, while the expenditures have declined by about 5.5%. I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 Employment and Income, Page 51 I Taxes Collected by Tspe

Year Total Operation/ Administration Tax Police Fire Inspection Roads Refuse Expenditures Maintenance Collection Collection 6. Disposal 1985 1986 $1,055.113 $1,040,998 $75,267 $21,499 $1 83,484 $21,792 $1,674 $1 95,951 $1 19,752 11 1987 1,124,656 I 1,095,575I 67,649 I 16,392 I 186,274 I 19,716 I 1,889 I 163.218 I 138,126 11 1988 1,300,874 1,282.394 60,727 17.753 209,750 19,096 2,615 387.226 121,886 1989 1,720,420 1,245,145 74.545 15.667 194,607 28,368 10,357 21 6,800 174,067 1990 2,031,817 1,310.629 94,511 20,837 200.097 25,134 6,356 175,610 167,232 1991 1,285,100 1,262,656 66.005 16,778 225,164 23,277 6.439 195,631 156,965 1992 1,373.072 1,345,926 100,351 21,147 230,995 30,812 6,399 151,771 168,472 1993 1,039,038 88,865 20,469 244,497 23,333 3,137 116,841 173,253 1994* 996,719 136,432 2.030 238,795 25,700 400 82,518 202,926

Employment and Income, Page 52 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

As with the cost of most commodities, several departments have experienced I an increase in the cost for services. Those areas which have seen the greatest impact have been administration, police and refuse collection. In order to I maintain a relatively "stable" Borough budget through this period , Borough Council has opted to shift monies from other departments to those that have been 1 increasing. I For future budgets, there will be required a "rethinking" of revenue generation as additional pressures from the business community are brought forth to Council to reduce, or even eliminate, the business privilege tax. During the formation of I its own "action plan," the Business Association identified the business tax as a "punishment tax" which was partly responsible for the closing of several small I businesses in the Borough. Any action taken by the Council in dealing with the business privilege tax will require further analysis as to how the revenue can be 1 replaced or cuts made in the services provided. I One possible scenario that has not been discussed as yet, in dealing with the rising costs to the Borough in providing essential services, is that of regional I cooperation, either through joint agreements, or even better, a Council of Governments [COG]. Cooperation among local governments can cut the cost of the provision of services in several areas, such as purchasing police protection, I code enforcement, joint investment, maintenance, equipment purchase and other areas. I

A Council of Governments is a voluntary association of local governments that I can provide adjacent communities with the opportunity to assist one another through joint discussion, decision and action. 1 Financial Management I Source: American City 6 County: Article Author; Stephen Alfred Many communities in Armstrong County, as well as in Pennsylvania and the I northeast are dealing with the problem of how to deal with the ever-increasing demand for services, and the need to create additional revenue sources or I enhancing existing sources in order to provide for those services. 1 Employment and Income, Page 53 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

At this time, the most-used procedures to increase revenues are not popular with either the Borough residents, or the Borough employees. The most used procedures are:

P Tax increases/user fees - which tend to anger the residents as well as prove to be an economic burden on those residents with fixed incomes. For Ford City, this latter fact is a major one due to the overall age of Borough residents; and * Cuts in services provided - with corresponding layoffs of Borough personnel. This action also poses threats to the residents because of cutbacks in necessary services.

Either of these actions, although necessary in order to maintain solvency, are unpopular politically. However, other alternatives are beginning to make their presence known in the region, and may prove to be a means of addressing a serious concern Some approaches, in practice include: + Providing services to other governments for a fee [e.g. leaf and branch composting site]; I + Selling outdated municipal artifacts (e.g. signs, fire hydrants, parking meters]; I % Requesting acceleration of revenues that state and county governments collect and distribute to the Borough;

P Other long-range programs such as:

Business retention activities [e.g. tax abatements, loans] Economic development projects for commercial and industrial areas.

In addition to the creation of additional funds such as those identified above, there are other means of providing adequate funding levels for municipal programs, such as reduced spending or increased efficiency in existing programs. Two examples of this are regionalization and privatization. Both of these concepts have been historically "cast aside", however, each does provide an opportunity to the Borough in reducing expenditures. Through its participation in a COG, the Borough could possibly realize some reductions in various programs. The possibility exists for the Borough to participate in additional programs and provide

Employment and Income, Page 54 g I further fee reductions for its residents. Regionalization is quickly becoming more 1 of a rule than an exception in the region, through expansion into regional recycling programs, police coverage , equipment purchase and recreation programs. 1

Privatization itself is a concept which is relatively new in the region and remains, for most municipalities, an unused method of providing services at an 1 efficient cost to residents due to the competitive bidding process. I At this point in its existence, having experienced a very specific trend of decline in its economic and tax base, Ford City Borough should be preparing alternative 1 "revenue enhancement'' programs such as those described earlier. The most popular forms of revenue enhancement programs are those in which the financial I goals are achieved without affecting the services provided to the residents.

Should it be determined that the Borough must reduce services to its 1 residents, the elected officials may want to incorporate procedures to reduce the "stress" cause by such reductions by: 1 Incorporating incentives to employees who find and implement budget reductions; I Encouraging community surveys to indicate whether the Borough is meeting, exceeding or falling short on expected service levels and possible I areas of reduction; Include key personnel in the decision-making process, including department I heads and supervisors. Above all, the Borough residents should be encouraged to participate in the I process and suggest ways to produce savings and improve operations. 1 I I I 1 Employment and Income, Page 55 I I FORD CrrY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSWE PLAN

1 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

I Stnets and AXghways I Streets and highways are major uses of land. In typical "urban" communities, they can occupy up to thirty percent (30%) of the community's "developed" land area. In addition, the street and highway layout is a major factor regarding other I uses of land, often acting as an influence to the type of land uses which may be I most appropriate, as well as where specific land uses are located. For most land development reviews, street and highway characteristics, such I as condition, traffic volume, and functional classifications, etc. , play an important I role in the determination of the decision. The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation classifies highways throughout the Commonwealth according to their level of service, or the function, which they I perform. The purpose is to guide funding investments to the most important I highway facilities. The following functional classifications are used: Urban Principal Arterial - Serves major centers of activity and carries high proportion of area travel. This highway type carries most trips entering I and leaving the area and serves intra-area travel. Urban Minor Arterial - Accommodates trips of moderate length; places I emphasis on land access and offers lower traffic mobility. Interconnects with, and augments, principal arterials. I Urban Collector - Provides both land access and traffic circulation; collects traffic from local streets and channels to arterials and vice versa. I Rural Principal Arterial - Serves statewide or interstate travel; serves all urbanized areas, provides integrated movements without stub connections. I Rural Minor Arterial - Links cities, larger towns, and traffic generators; provides integrated interstate and intercounty service; accommodates I greater trip lengths and travel densities than collectors. Rural Major Collector - Provides service to county seats, larger towns and other traffic generators; connects routes of higher classification; serves I intracounty travel corridors. I Transportation and Circulation, Page 56 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

+ Rural Minor Collector - Collects traffic from local roads; provides service to I remaining smaller communities; links local traffic with rural areas.

In addition to the functional classification, the Pennsylvania Department of I Transportation also identifies highways throughout the Commonwealth which are critical to the economy. The primary purpose of the classification is to assign I greater priority for funding such highways. Three (3) commercial networks have been identified: I + Priority Commercial Network (PGN) - Includes intercity and interstate highways which are the Commonwealth's main arteries of commerce; I serves as the economic backbone of the Commonwealth; carries heavy volume of trucks. I + Industrial Commercial Access Network (IAN) - Serves as a feeder system to the Priority Commercial Network; includes other state and local roadways which are vital to the movement of raw materials and finished I products.

+ Agricultural Access Network (AAN) - Includes state and local roadways I which are vital to the movement of goods and materials to and from farms and agriculturally-based businesses. I Ford City Borough contains almost 15% miles of roadway, comprising approximately sixteen percent (16%) of the land available in the Borough. Of this I 15.30 miles of road, 13.55 miles are considered local, while 1.75 miles are State-owned. There are no federal roadways within the Borough boundaries. I Major TricRoutes I As discussed previously, Ford City Borough, although it does not have a ''major'' highway running through it, does have excellent access to such arterials and I regional transportation routes. Within the Borough, there exists a well-defined system of streets providing service ranging from light residential traffic and I through traffic, to moderate commercial traffic, mostly from truck transportation from the existing industrial base. I Collectors: The major traffic routes accessing Ford City directly are PA routes I 128 and 66. I Transportation and Circulation, Page 57 I 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I b PA Route 128 is a two-lane highway and is considered an "urban minor arterial." Route 128 provides access across the Allegheny River and points south along the river, and is classified as an Agricultural Access I Network highway. However, a major safety concern for drivers, and pedestrians alike, is the variation in the width of the road. From 17th Street to 14th Street, I Route 128 (5th Avenue) has adequate width to provide access as the designated "truck route" through the Borough. Beginning at 14th I Street, and going to 1Ith Street, the roadway narrows and forms a "bottleneck" to traffic. Add to this the face that on-street parking is I permitted, and the hazard increases tremendously. After 1Ith Street, the roadway widens again, continuing to 8th Street, I from which it again narrows to the Borough line. This situation has been a safety concern of Borough officials and residents, for several years (as can be seen in the comments received I at the public meeting) and is one which has been addressed in the I Action Plan. b PA Route 66 is also a two-lane highway and is classified as an "urban principal arterial" since it serves centers of activity and carries a high I proportion of area travel and inter-area travel. Route 66 forms the eastern boundary of the Borough and Manor Township, and as such does not provide service to the business area of the Borough. It serves I that part of the Borough on top of the ridge and intersects with local streets. Route 66 provides the primary north-south route for Ford City Borough residents, and is also classified as a Priority Commercial I Network route. I The remaining roads and streets within the Borough are considered local streets.

I Other Regional Highways - PA Route 66 directly connects Ford City Borough residents with U.S. Route 422, a rural principal arterial, which provides the 1 primary east-west route; and connects with PA Route 18 which provides arterial service to the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Both Routes 422 and 28 are part of I the Priority Commercial Network. I

Transportation and Circulation, Page 58 FORD CrrY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Deficiencies - The roadway and circulation system in Ford City is in relatively I good condition with little, or no, restriction to travel. Most of the streets in the Borough are well-maintained. I

However, the streets in downtown Ford City, especially those in the downtown I commercial area, are restricted due to the on-street parking which is permitted on 4th and 5th Avenues and 9th, IOth, Ford and O'Connor Streets. Several I proposed solutions to this problem have been brought forward, including the prohibition of on-street parking and the widening of 4th or 5th Avenues; however, I neither of these proposal have been met with much enthusiasm, either by the residents or the business owners. I Another area of concern by the Borough that is viewed as a deficiency, is the routing of truck traffic along 5th Avenue, the main street in the Borough, which, I for the most part, is lined with residential uses. No specific solutions have been formally proposed to address this issue. One possible idea could be the rerouting I of the truck traffic along 17th Street to 3rd Avenue, which borders the railroad line and the industrial district. 1 Proposed Improvements - At this time there is only one major project proposed for the Borough, and that is the proposed placement of the Ford City I Bridge, which carries Route 128 over the Allegheny River. The preliminary design work has been completed for the bridge and the Department of Transportation is I beginning the process of seeking a design engineer for final design. As a part of the total bridge project, realignment of the roadway (Route 128) is included. I No other improvement projects are proposed for major traffic routes in the 1 Borough.

Transit Sedce I

Ford City Borough is serviced by the Mid County Transit Authority which I provides bus service to Kittanning and Ford City Boroughs and adjacent suburban areas. The main stop in the Borough is located at Klingensmith's, with service I being provided on an average basis of one [I] hour during the week. On Saturday, I Transportation and Circulation, Page 59 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I only one (1) bus runs and makes four (4) trips per day. All buses will stop at any corner along 4th Avenue. I At this time, there are no changed proposed for the stops or service I schedules of the transit service. I Other Transportation Railroad service in the Borough was discontinued in the early 1990's. The tracks were removed in 1993, thereby ending any possible renewal of service to the I Borough and/or the industrial sites. Possible re-use of the railroad right-of-way can be accomplished by the Borough in a manner of ways, with the most likely being the I conversion to a hikinmiking trail. The Allegheny River can also be a major transportation resource for the Borough. In I the past, the River was primarily used by the industrial uses on the riverfront. Access to the River was one of the factors leading to the development of the 1 Borough. Through time, .even the use of the River has dwindled. As noted with the railroad, any future use and access to the River will be dependent upon the I Borough's success in establishing a program and for the provision of access to the River and possible re-use of the vacant property.

I At this time, access to the River is only by the industrial sector (Eljer) and I is not available to the public. The land use portion of the document has identified, as one of the priorities for I action by the Borough, the redevelopment of the industrial area with provisions to provide access (preferably public) to the Allegheny River.

I Street Conditions and Cliaractexiktics

I All streets in the Borough either have been paved or are bricked, and are in relatively good condition. For the most part, the streets are well-maintained with I several areas requiring pothole repair or minor resurfacing, including: 3rd Avenue (entire length) I 5th Avenue (south of 10th Street) I 6th Avenue (south of 10th Street) Transportation and Circulation, Page 60 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

All of the alleys are paved and are in need of maintenance services, mostly 1 spot pothole repairs and some resurfacing. I I I I I I I I I I I

Ferndale Street 30 13.6’ 2 way Ford Street 50 26.6’ 2 way

Transportation and Circulation, Page 61 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Street R-O-W Cartway Traffic Flow Width Hill Road 3 5' 26.6' 2 way Hill Street 20 17.6' 2 way Manor Drive 30 18.6' 2 way Neale Avenue 50 26.6' 2 way OConnor Street 50' 26.6' 2 way Ridge Avenue 35' 18.6' 1 way, south

I

'I

I

Transportation and Circulation, Page 62

I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I EXISTING LAND USE

I Ford City Borough, as well as being one of the smaller municipalities in land areas within Armstrong County at approximately .8 of a square mile in size, also I has the distinction of owning property on both sides of the Allegheny River. This came into being in the 1970s when PPG donated approximately two hundred and I six (206) acres of ground between the River and Route 128 on the western bank on land formerly located in North Buffalo Township. A portion of this land, I approximately sixteen [ 16) acres, has been developed into ballfields which service the entire area for baseball and softball leagues, while the remaining portion has remained unused. The site a former dumping grounds for PPG and is being I considered for inspection for possible contamination.

I For the most part, Ford City Borough is developed. There still exist some scattered vacant parcels on a lot-by-lot basis. (Additional property has become I available with the recent closing and demolition of the PPG plant; however, this property remains to be inspected for possible contamination.)

I With the Borough being an "elderly" community, the development pattern is welldefined with distinct separation of districts, e.g. , the industrial district being I separated from the remainder of the Borough by the railroad tracks, and the downtown commercial district being separated from the southern residential 1 district by Boulder Park. Overall, the land uses are of generally good quality. However, there do exist those uses [or former uses) which could be removed or I rehabilitated. The provision, and enforcement, of the necessary codes come into I play as a possible solution. Land Use Survey

I In the fall of 1994, a field survey of the Borough was completed which catalogued the existing land uses of Ford City Borough by property, including the I general condition of structure and the provision of parking facilities.

I The field survey developed several categories of land use, dividing them into the following : I Existing Land Use, Page 63 I I

b Residential I Single and two-family Multi-family I b Commercial I b Industrial b Public I b Semi-public I b Recreation b Vacant I The Land Use Map provides a pictorial illustration of what the Borough looks like today. A copy of the 1966 land use map has been included to provide a I comparison of the changes over the almost thirty (30)year time span. The existing land use map is one of the most important tools for analyzing a I community and for the development of the Plan. I Several observations were made in the 1966 Plan which still have significant merit in the development of this Plan. Those observations which still hold true I today include:

+ Residential development is scattered throughout the Borough, with no particular pattern in regard to higher densities being observed. I

+ Although the Borough abuts the Allegheny river, no river-oriented recreation areas have been provided. I

+ Commercial development predominates the Central Business District, with a mix of some office and residential uses. I

+ There does not exist any "easilydefined" neighborhoods in the Borough.

+ Commercial development has begun to infiltrate the northern portion of I the Borough near Route 66. I I 1 Existing Land Use, Page 64 I 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I Residential Land Use

I Single family residential uses dominate the Borough, with two-family houses scattered throughout the neighborhoods. Multi-family dwellings exist for the I elderly, located at the intersection of 5th and 10th streets, known as Freedom Apartments; in addition, a twenty-four (24) unit structure under construction at I this time at the corner of 3rd Avenue and 13th Street. Other apartment units are found on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th floors in several buildings in the Central Business I District. Most of the residential buildings are of older stock, with the "newer" homes I being located at the top of the ridge located near Route 66. Existing lots are narrow, with alleys located between streets and a home fronting on both the I street and the alley. I CommerciaILand Use

The Central Business District is generally considered to be that area between I O'Connor Street and Ninth Street, along both 4th and 5th Avenues. Other areas of commercial concentration occur around the Route 66 entrance area on the I north side and on the "ridge" along Route 66. Other commercial land uses, both retail and office, are found scattered throughout the Borough, most of which are I convenience-type establishments, and classified as "nonconforming uses." I

Ford City Borough grew due to the location of heavy industrial establishments I along the river. Industrial land has always been a major factor in the land use of the Borough. However, the influence exerted by industrial uses is likely to change I due to the recent closing and demolition of the former PPG site.

I The Borough still remains a major industrial center with the continued growth of the Eljer Company plant and the Macado Industrial Complex. I I Existing Land Use, Page 65 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PIAN I I One of the major items which confronts the Borough at this time, is the development of a program to provide for the redevelopment of the PPG site in a way that will benefit the Borough, as well as the region. I

Remation I Recreational opportunities in Ford City are at a premium for its residents. 1 Currently, the Borough has five (51 parks/playgrounds available , totaling almost eleven (11) acres [about 2.5% of the total land area]. These five (51 I parks/playgrounds provide a variety of recreation activities, however they are relatively small in size, with the largest (Fort Run Park] consisting of 3.48 acres, providing a ball field and tennis/basketball court facilities. This park, although not I conveniently located for many Borough residents, "plays home" to the High School girls softball team and provides the only ballfield under Borough ownership. The I playgrounds (7th Avenue and Boulder Park] consists of open space and the Ford City Borough Park consists of passive recreation (benches, gazebo, sidewalks]. I The Ford View park is located at the top of the ridge and services those Borough residents with limited playground equipment. I An.addition to the recreational land use classifications has been the donation of I over two hundred (2001 acres from PPG to the Borough in the early 70s. The fact that it is across the river and almost one mile from Ford City in North Buffalo Township, however, prevents easy access to the residents. This property has I been partially developed with four (41 ballfields, two (21 concession stands, two (2) volleyball courts, one (1] pavilion and several picnic tables. The recreational use I area consists of approximately 16.5 acres. I Recreational Fadties I

Name Size FaciI ities [acres] I 7th Avenue 0.7 playground equipment Boulder Park 2.1 playground equipment; playfields I Borough Park 3.4 passive recreation I Existing Land Use, Page 66 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I Name Size Facilities [acres) I Ford View 4.53 open space; natural area; playground equipment I Fort Run Park 3.48 ballfield; tennis/basketball Ford City Community Ballfields 1 6.5 ballfields; pavilion; volleyball; picnic tables I Total Acreage 30.71 I In addition to the Borough facilities, the School District also has some areas available within the Borough including ballfields, play areas and basketball/tennis I courts. A recent contest held by the Lions Club of the Borough requesting letters from I high school students as to why Ford City Borough is a good place to live, produced one singular common thread in the responses - the need for improvement of the I existing recreational facilities and the creation of a recreation/activity center for teenagers.

1 These comments bear some merit from the ''users'' of the facilities and have I been passed on to the appropriate officials. In reviewing the recreational activities of Borough residents, and the comments I made during the public meetings, there is a definite need to provide public access to the Allegheny River, especially since most of the shoreline has been committed I to industrial uses. The interest in water-oriented sports has been growing rapidly, I and this portion of the river provides an excellent potential for water activities.

I Recreation activities are a part of the total environment of any community. Planning for recreational activities and programs must be tied into the land use I planning and redevelopment process.

I1 It has been noted that seventy-five percent (75%) of all recreation activity takes place within thirty (301 minutes of home. Ford City Borough should earmark a ~I portion of its Capital Improvement Program activities and budget for the I Existing Land Use, Page 67 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

development, maintenance and improvement of parks and recreation areas, and I focus on the development of public access to the Allegheny River. I

This category encompasses all land and buildings used by government I agencies, schools, churches, clubs, union halls and public facilities. For its relative size, the Borough has an abundance of public and semi-public uses I throughout the Borough. Major public uses in the Borough include the municipal structures, public school district structures, federal reserve building, public utility I structures, parking areas, parochial school structures and twelve (1 2) churches and parsonages. Also included in this category is the railroad facilities in the I Borough.

These land uses are key elements to the residential development of the I Borough and can act as landmarks for the community, and even the region. I Vacant/undeveloped Land I Land not assigned to any of the above-identified land use categories is considered vacant. A large portion of the vacant land in Ford City is wooded and located on severe slopes, which renders it undevelopable. A recent change in the 1 amount of vacant land occurred with the demolition of the PPG plan facility. This added approximately forty-seven (471 acres to this category. I

Fu- Development I The currently vacant PPG property will become the prime focus for 1 development within the Borough during the next decade. The formulation of codes and/or ordinances which will provide for the "highest and best" use of the property in relation to Borough goals, should become a "desired end" for Borough I officials. I All of these land use categories are identified on the Land Use Map. The Land Use Map is a basic tool used in the preparation of a future land use plan. 1

Existing Land Use, Page 68 I I I I A comparison of the types of land uses and their percentage of the total I property available in the Borough is as follows:

I 1966 1995 Acres I % Acres I % I Residential - Single/2 family" 85.2 19.7 127.4 19.9 Multi-family* 41.1 9.5 4.5 0.7 Commercial 54.5 12.6 23.6 3.7 I industrial 83.1 19.2 52.1 8.2 Public/Semi Public* * 50.6 11.7 66.1 10.4 I Recreation * * 26.8 4.2 Streets 83.1 19.2 83.1 13 I Vacant 35 8.1 255 39.9 I Total I 432.6 I 100 I 638.6 I 100 * 1966 figures included twefamity dwelling units with multiifamily figures I * * 1966 figures included railroad and recreation acreage in the public/semi-public category

I As you can see, several categories have experienced large amounts of change, which relates to major occurrences during the past twenty-five (251 years, e.g., I the donation of property from PPG to the Borough; the closing and demolition of I the former PPG facility. Growth and change in Ford City is likely to occur as a result of rehabilitation and re-use of existing buildings and properties rather than new construction. In I the residential areas, a potential still exists for the conversion of larger single-family homes into two-family and muiti-family units. The elected officials of I the Borough must determine whether or not the conversion of existing single-family homes into multi-family units is a positive factor for the Borough's I residents. If not, the Borough's zoning ordinance will require revision. I I i Existing Land Use, Page 69 I

I I I I I I I I I ~I I I I

1 II I FLOODPLAINS 100 'T'R FLOODPLAIN 500 YR FLGODPLAIN

I i I1 1 SCALE IN FEET 1 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH I I o 400 aoo 1200 1600 zoo0 ARMSTRONG COUNTY PREFAREDBY wr4puN. INC.. JULY 1995 I II I I I I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I REGIONAL RELATIONSHIP

I Any municipal plan for development or preservation within its boundaries must take into consideration its relationship with the surrounding jurisdictions. Regional I and sub-regional factors can, and do, have influence on a municipality's scheme of development, from its network of roads, to utility expansion. 1 Ford City Borough has acted as a regional employment base for decades due to the PPG and Eljer Manufacturing operations. This base has permitted the I Borough to be able to provide a variety of services at levels not often found in small towns. However, with the recent closing of the plant, the Borough is I adjusting its programs and services to deal with the major economic change. In addition, the completion of the demolition of the former PPG structures, the I Borough is considering the possible re-use of the site. I With the County seat being located only three (31 miles away in Kittanning Borough, Ford City residents have always compared the level of services being I provided. Ford City has accepted its role as an employment and business center and the I existing Council has determined that these characteristics are ones that should be maintained. Being the only one of the six (61 contiguous municipalities around the I Borough with an existing Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance, attributes to the foresight of past Borough officials and the perseverance of the existing officials I in an effort to maintain the Borough's role in the region.

Ford City's land use scheme has centered, literally, around the Central 'I Business District [CBD] and the industrial area. This scheme does not appear to require any significant alterations during the next decade, with the only exception I being the former PPG site.

I The adjacent municipalities look to Ford City as the center of activity for most small shopping trips, while shopping for larger items will most often take them across the river to shop in East Franklin Township. I I I I Regional Relationship, Page 71 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I I As you look at the statistical comparisons of the contiguous municipalities, you can see that the boroughs in the region represent the overall demographic and economic trend in the northeast United States. All of the boroughs, including I Ford City, show trends of population loss: of an aging population; of lower housing values and smaller "families" [ persons per household). In most instances, figures I for the boroughs fall below the County-wide average. I While the boroughs in the region are experiencing "negative" trends, the townships in the same area are undergoing the opposite trends, seeing new I housing starts, increased housing values, median family income rise and trends which are "raising" their demographic and economic statistics above the County I levels.

Regional Compan'sons I

Population I Table #31 I Municipality 1970 1980 %change 1990 %change Bethel Township 1,128 1,349 + 19.6 1,261 - 6.5 Ford City Borough 4,749 3,923 - 17.4 3,413 - 13.0 I Ford Cliff Borough 526 585 + 11.2 443 - 24.3 Kittanning Borough 6,231 5,432 - 12.8 5,014 - 7.7 I Manor Township 5,030 4,820 - 4.2 4,502 - 6.6 IlManorville Borough 445 405 - 9.0 425 I +4.9 - I IArmstrong County I 75,590 I 77,768 I +2.9 I 73,478 I - 5.5 A 1 Age Gmups - 1990 I Municipality % 19 &Under % 19 to 64 % 65 &Over I Bethel Township 28.0* 59.4" 12.6 Ford City Borough 20.4 51 28.6* Ford Cliff Borough 26 53 21 I 1 Regional Relationship, Page 72 I 1 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I Municipality % 19 6 Under % 19 to 64 % 65 &Over I Kittanning Borough 27.6 47.3 25.1 Manor Township 23.9 57.3 18.8 I Manorville Borough 23.5 52.7 23.8 Armstrong County 27 55.4 17.6 I hcome - 1990 I I Table #33 Municipality Per Capita Median Family % Below I Income Poverty Bethel Township I $10,174 $27,632 10.2 Ford Cliff Borough 9,731 25,625 7.7 Kittanning Borough 9, 248 21,172 22.4 I Manor Township 12,022 30,417 6.9 Manorville Borough 11,075 26,250 14.8 I Armstrong County 10,565 27,024 7.6

I Ho~Sing- 1990 I Municipality Total Units % Owner % Single Median Persons per occupied Family Market Household I Value Bethel Township 61 6 66.4 98.5 $49,900 2.74 11 I Ford City Borough 1,701 56.5 83.7 35,200 2.17 11 Ford Cliff Borough 177 85.9 98.9 44,600 1 Kittanning Borough 2,405 48.7 59.7 38,400 +I Manor Township 1,888 63.6 95.3 52,700 2.55 Manorville Borough 195 58.5 82.4 36,200 2.27 11 I Armstrong County 31,757 68.1 89.6 44,100 2.56 ]I I I Regional Relationship, Page 73 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Median market value lower in Borough's could be due to several factors I including:

+ Tendency for housing to be older in Boroughs I + More housing being built in "rural" (Township) areas I + Cost of housing in rural areas are elevated + The number of persons below poverty level tend to be higher in Boroughs I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Regional Relationship, Page 74 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I LAND USE PLAN

I The Land Use Plan provides guidelines for the pattern and intensity of future development or redevelopment in Ford City Borough. A primary purpose of the I Plan is the enhancement of the existing residential character of the Borough, and the improvement of the residential environment throughout the Borough. I Balanced with these basic housing concerns is the need to retain a healthy base of economic activity, both industrial and commercial , in appropriate areas.

1 In relation to this last comment, the Borough is the beneficiary of having a viable , energetic Business and Professional Association which has developed a I "vision program" for the downtown Ford City business district. The Associations vision statement focuses on the improvement of the business district, both I physically, through rehabilitation and facade improvement programs, and also economically, through the development of marketing activities, promotions and I joint programs with the Borough. The recommendations of the Ford City Business and Professional Association will be incorporated into this report under the I commercial land use section. This element of the Comprehensive Development Plan accounts for existing I development and circulation patterns and conditions in the Borough and proposes "actions" for redevelopment. General policies for redevelopment include: 1 A. Recommend ordinances which the Borough can enact to ensure safe and well-designed development and structural rehabilitation

I B. Encourage improvement of existing development by maintaining and improving public services I C. Provide for a balance of land use and public open space as a part of the redevelopment planning process 1 D. Maximize the development potential of the former PPG site through I appropriate code and ordinance revisions The proposed Land Use Plan for Ford City Borough and its recommendations 1 are illustrated in the Land Use Plan Map. I Land Use Plan, Page 75 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PIAN

Land Use

Residential

I Goal: Maintain Residential "Character" of the Borough 1. Objective - Protect property values I A. Implementation Actions Review existing zoning ordinance for possible "incompatible" zoning I use boundaries; consider rezoning to alleviate these in compatible uses. I Develop regulations which require buffer yards and/or landscaping between varying land uses I Develop building codes which address Borough construction standards Develop property maintenance code which provides for consistent I property conditions throughout the Borough. I B. Responsibility = Borough Council - final action for implementation of ordinance development and revision rests with the Borough Council. II Borough Planning Commission - the Planning Commission reviews all proposed ordinances and amendments and recommends specific actions to Borough Council. Code Enforcement Official - enforces standards/requirements of ordinances/codes. Residents/Property Owners - are responsible for complying with Borough Ordinances; by keeping properties in good condition, all adjacent properties will benefit. 2. Objective - Upgrade housing conditions A. Implementation Actions Create a program which establishes standards for the provision of housing rehab assistance Develop a schedule of improvements for those areas in the Borough which have been targeted for rehabilitation

Land Use Plan, Page 76 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Coordinate program activities with Armstrong County to gain I assistance in identifying and addressing the Borough's needs. 6. Responsibility I Borough Council - responsible for identifying areas requiring rehabilitation and enacting rehabilitation program; can elicit Armstrong County Redevelopment Authority and Community I Development assistance in developing and administering program Homeowners - participants in program to upgrade residential I characteristics. 3. Objective - Provide affordable housing for all ages and income groups I A. Implementation Actions Review zoning ordinance to determine need to provide for a "wider I range" of housing types [e.g. townhouses, apartments) and redevelopment areas I Develop provisions which limit the conversion of structures into "granny flats" or apartments I Seek assistance from available County/State/Federal programs for both funding and project development. Available programs, at this time are I Armstrong County CDBG DCA's Housing Program I HUD's Section 108 Loan Program 1 FmHA DCA's Small Communities Program I 6. Responsibility Borough Council - has final action for approval of all programs; I must develop line of communication with County/State/Federal agencies which can provide assistance. I 9 Borough Planning Commission - has a role in reviewing proposed plans and recommending actions and activities which would address these needs. I Property owners - participate in programs which will assist in meeting Borough goals. I I Land Use Plan, Page 77 I FORD CTp( BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Commercia I

Goal: Revitalize the Business District as a main commercial district (include Business Association recommendations) 1. Objective - Upgrade commercial district A. Implementation Actions Develop a plan for the revitalization of the Business District/include plans for facade rehabilitation reuse of structures tax abatement relief from business tax Seek assistance from available sources at the County and State levels Review zoning ordinance to determine that it provides adequate standards for commercial and mixed-use structures/develop provisions for a larger variety of mixed uses/address business district parking provisions Encourage facade upgrades by property owner Develop maintenance standards for commercial structures. B. Responsibility Borough Council - develop programs which provide rehabilitation of structures, including "tax-abatement" or "refund" provisions. Borough Planning Commission - will review existing and proposed ordinances; provide recommendations for revisions to the zoning ordinance Business Association - complete building/facade rehab; participate in Borough programs; provide input in development of Borough programs; provide assistance to local owners. 2. Objective - Update Building CodeslOrdinances A. Implementation Actions

Land Use Pian, Page 78 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Develop updated building codes which will provide a stronger base I for maintaining safety and welfare of property owners and residents. I Develop standards for commercial properties in relation to maintenance and re-use. Codifyication of existing Borough ordinances. I E. Responsibility 1 Borough Council - final approval of any building code update, property maintenance and/or re-use standards rests with Council. 1 - Borough Planning Commission - provides recommendations to Council on all proposed amendments. Property Owners - must comply with codes and ordinances; can I provide comments to Planning Commission and Council. I Industrial

Ford City Borough was built around major industrial factories, namely PPG and I Eljer. Prior to 1990, these establishments, along with Macado Park, controlled twenty percent (20%) of the land in the Borough. However, with the demise of I the PPG site, the landscape has changed dramatically - the Borough now sees an opportunity to redo it's land use scheme to provide for some varying types of land 1 use that was not available in the past. I Goal: Redevelop Former PPG Site 1. Objective - Provide for a variety of uses I A. Implementation Actions Develop strategy for possible re-use of site I Review existing zoning ordinance to determine limitations Develop updated standards which can permit a variety of uses on I the site B. Responsibility I Borough Council - final approval of any land use plan and/or regulation rests with Council I I Land Use Plan, Page 79 I

I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I Borough Planning Commission - reviews proposed ordinance amendments and development plans and recommends action to I Council Goal: Maintain existing industrial district I 1. Objective - Upgrade property conditions I A. Implementation Actions Develop a property maintenance program for non-residential properties I Establish updated building standards which will provide for safer construction and rehabilitation of all industrial structures I B. Responsibility Borough Council - responsible for final action to approve ordinances I and codes. Code Enforcement Official - enforces standards/requirements of I codes and ordinances Property Owners - comply with regulations. I 2. Objective - Update building codes I A. Implementation Actions Complete review of existing building codes to determine status of non-residential standards I Upgrade/revise standards, as necessary, to provide most up-to-date code requirements in terms of safety, emergency I services and construction practices. B. Responsibility I Borough Council - final approval for passage of updated codes/standards rests with Council. I Code Enforcement Official - can provide recommendations to Council on condition of existing codes; responsible for enforcement.

I Other Uses

I Ford City Borough, as well as having a large percentage of industrial land use, I also has a proportionately large amount of land dedicated as "public or Land Use Plan, Page 80 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1

semi-public" uses. This would include the land occupied by the municipal parks, I school buildings (both public and private), churches, parsonages, roads, streets and railroads. However, with all this area available, the Borough residents have I never had the chance to access the Allegheny River to enjoy its recreational opportunities. With the recent dismantling of the PPG facility, there has been an I increase in interest in the provision of some regulations which may permit the development of some type of recreational opportunity on the river. I Goal: Provide for access to the Allegheny River I 1. Objective - Purchase Riverfront property A. Implementation Actions I Approach property owners to make offer Seek Armstrong County assistance in purchasing/developing I ProPew. 6. Responsibility I m Borough Council - responsible for decision to pursue purchase of property and to seek County assistance. I 2. Objective - Develop land use regulations which will permit riverfront access, recreational development and/or scenic view protection, and to see that the river is used to its fullest potential. I A. Implementation Actions I Revise zoning ordinance to permit riverfront development Develop new regulations which would preserve the riverfront and the scenic view opportunities available, and provide for access to I the river 6. Responsibility I Borough Council - must authorize review of zoning ordinance and approve any proposed amendments; must approve any new land I use regulations Borough Planning Commission - must review and make I recommendations to Council regarding action on proposed ordinances and revisions I I Land Use Plan, Page 81 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I Residents - must provide input in developing revisions and/or ordinances at public meetings and hearings.

I Municipal Servlices

1 Ford City Borough is serviced by public sewer and water facilities, public transit and public garbage pick-up that includes a recycling program. At this time, the I Borough is adequately served by public facilities with the possible exception of recreational areas and a community center. This plan stresses that the Borough I must be aware of emerging needs and the demand for such facilities. The Borough must monitor the facilities [e.g. a user survey) and provide for those I demands by upgrading I maintaining and even expanding those existing facilities and, possibly, providing new facilities as warranted.

I Goal: Upgrade Community Facilities I 1. Objective - Identify needs A. Implementation Actions I Complete user survey of specific facilities, such as: water I sewer library I recreation/parks parking I streets/sidewalks The survey could be an 'on-going' part of the Borough's newsletter. I Responses to questions/concerns over facilities, or lack thereof, could be solicited.

I 6. Responsibility Borough Council, staff - again, holds main authority for action on I Borough level; could enlist help of local organizations in development, distribution and tabulation of surveys. I 2. Objective - Develop Capital Improvements Program I Land Use Plan, Page 82 I FORD CrrY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

A. Implementation Actions I Prepare an inventory of existing facilities Determine types of expenditures to be included [e.g. land, I construction, equipment) = Determine number of years to be included in the Capital I Improvement period Develop "calendar of events" (timing) of completion I Establish financial policies/identify fiscal constraints Establish format for public involvement -I B. Responsibility I Borough Council - begins process; final action for approval Borough Departments I input as to inventory of facilities develop "wish list" I assist in development of timing = Borough residents I provide input for prioritization of needs attend public hearings I 3. Objective - Upgrade Municipal Services A. Implementation Actions I rehabilitate and replace water treatment and storage facilities I develop working relationship with Armstrong County for funding programs = obtain Army Reserve structure through purchase or other means I to act as community center develop senior citizen activity/recreation program I upgrade recreation program - develop user survey, identify deficiencies I expand library building; seek financial assistance from State separate joint sanitary and storm sewer lines I I Land Use Plan, Page 83 I I FORD ClTy BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

1 B. Responsibility Borough Council - must provide direction to citizens; complete I prioritization of services to be improved. Planning Commission - provide assistance and recommendations to I Council on activities and programs available for funding Armstrong County - provide assistance, both technical and financial, I as necessary, to the Borough to attain goals I The overall condition of the street network in Ford City is relatively good, with I some areas requiring spot maintenance. The reuse of the former Con Rail Railroad right-of-way also lends itself as a project to be attained by the Borough. Additionally, the lack of public access to the Allegheny River, with the ever-increasing popularity of water recreation activities, should be of major importance to the elected officials and to the residents.

Goal: Improve Traffic Circulation I 1. Objective: Provide safer truck traffic circulation A. Implementation Actions Review existing circulation patterns I Identify alternative route[s] for truck traffic - with adequate turning areas and cartway widths Enlist assistance provided by PennDOT and SPRPC in devising new I patterns I B. Responsibility Borough Council - Responsible for final action[s] in establishing I weight limits and directional restrictions for traffic. Borough Planning Commission - Review and recommend revised circulation plans. I Public Works - Can assist in identifying "problem" areas due to existing traffic patterns; can also assist in developing revised route I system. I Land Use Plan, Page 84 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

SPRPC/PennDot - Provide technical assistance in developing I alternatives; provide financial assistance to carry out recommendations. I 2. Objective - Provide additional off-street parking A. Implementation Actions I Review existing parking conditions Complete survey on use of existing spaces I Coordinate activities with the Ford City Business Association = Seek funding from outside sources to act as a match to Borough I funds for the upgrading and/or expansion of existing facilities = Add to Capital Improvement Budget I B. Responsibility Borough Council - Responsible for final approval of funding to I upgrade/maintain/expand parking facilities. = Business Association - Should have direct involvement in creation of I any plan addressing parking within the downtown area. PennDOT - Can act as a possible funding source. I Borough Planning Commission - Can develop capital improvement program; should review and recommend parking plan if not involved in its development. I 3. Objective - Upgrade current roadways I A. Implementation Actions Improve 5th Avenue by widening and/or removal of on-street I parking = Discuss possible upgrade of 5th Avenue with PennDOT I Create Capital Improvement Program which will identify specific projects for maintenance and upgrade. I Seek the input of the Business Association on any proposed improvements in the Central Business District [3rd Avenue, etc.] E. Responsibility I I I Land Use Pian, Page 85 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPR EHENSIVE PLAN

I = Borough Council - Main responsibility for final action in development and funding of improvement program; responsible for seeking I assistance from county/state/federal agencies and programs. PennDOT - Responsible for maintenance of 5th Avenue; can provide assistance [both technical and financial) to the Borough for local I road maintenance. Business Association - Must be directly involved in any program I development for improvements in the Business District. Borough Planning Commission - Review/develop Capital Improvement Program; review proposed projects.

Housing

The major goals dealing with the housing stock in Ford City Borough focus on the physical improvement of the existing housing and the provision of affordable housing for all levels of income of Borough residents, including the elderly. Demand for apartment units in the Borough is expected to increase over the next decade due to the aging population, thus the Borough should review its existing ordinances to provide for such uses.

Goal: Provide Adequate Housing for all Borough Residents 1. Objective - Upgrade housing conditions A. Implementation Actions: Develop building codes Eliminate dilapidated structures Develop housing assistance program which focuses on the I rehabilitation of existing substandard and deteriorating housing. Develop property maintenance code I 6. Responsibility Borough Council - Has final approval action of any proposed I ordinance, code or rehabilitation program; can develop assistance program as a grant or low interest loan program. Borough Planning Commission - Responsible for development of I building codes, maintenance codes and housing assistance plan I [HAP]; makes recommendations on all proposed plans. Land Use Plan, Page 86 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

Residents - Comply with all codes and ordinances; participate with I programs developed by the Borough. 2. Objective - Upgrade Zoning Ordinance I A. Implementation Actions: Review existing ordinance to determine areas of noncompliance and I housing provisions Provide additional housing opportunities for the elderly, including I apartment and other types of multi-family uses Townhouse units, which may be adaptable to some of the vacant lots, are recommended as conditional uses I El. Responsibility I Borough Council - Final action on the development of any proposed amendments to existing ordinances. I Borough Planning Commission - Responsible for providing recommendations to update existing ordinances to comply with state standards and local needs. I 3. Objective - Create Borough Redevelopment Authority. With the creation of a local Redevelopment Authority, the Borough would I have the ability to become a major participant in the redevelopment of Borough properties. The County Redevelopment Authority could remain as a technical and financial advisor. I A. Implementation Action: I Create Ford City Borough Redevelopment Authority Appoint members I Development program to prioritize projects 6. Responsibility I Borough Council - Responsible for creating authority and appointing members. I Borough Planning Commission - Must identify areas of the Borough which are "blighted" and make recommendation to Borough I Council; may assist in redevelopment plan formation. Borough Redevelopment Authority - Responsible for creation of I document which establishes the project priorities to be completed. I Land Use Plan, Page 87 1 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I 4. Objective - Develop Standards for Redevelopment Proposals A. Implementation Actions: I Create review process for all redevelopment proposals Establish standards for development, including parking , height II limits, floor area, utilities, etc. B. Responsibility Borough Redevelopment Authority - Redevelopment standards shall be approved by Authority and formulated into policy Staff - Responsible for administering program, provide assistance to Borough residents. I County Redevelopment - Provide technical and financial assistance to Borough Authority.

Tlre Economy

As noted in the body of the Plan, Ford City's economic conditions have deteriorated during the past decade and a half. The closing of the PPG facility and several retail businesses have impacted the Borough with a loss of revenue and services to the residents. Borough officials and the Business Association are both aware of the need to "reinvigorate" the local economy. This can occur through a variety of actions. One of the most discussed action would be the recision of the I Borough's Business Tax which is based on the gross sales. This Tax has been identified as being a reason in several of the recent business closings.

Goal: Provide Additional Commercial Opportunities 1. Objective - Redevelop Former PPG Site A. Implementation Actions: ~I Revise Zoning Ordinance and map to provide additional permitted commercial/industriaI uses Develop local redevelopment authority in order to provide input in I redevelopment process I Create regulations which provide Borough review of all development 1 proposals

Land Use Plan, Page 88 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

B. Responsibility I Borough Council - Responsible for rezoning action; final approval of regulations creating local reviews; formation of Redevelopment I Authority. = Borough Planning Commission - Develop revised zoning ordinance and map; recommend regulations for site plan review; I review/recommend plans and applications. 2. Objective - Improve What's Available Downtown I A. Implementation Actions: I Rescind Business Tax Create an inventory of existing business spaces, both occupied and vacant I Develop map of businesses within the Borough; focus on downtown area I Create information database on vacant business spaces; provide information such as owner, size, location, condition of building, I lease/sale costs, realtor, etc. Survey users of downtown as to types of business/services they I would like downtown Develop program to promote downtown and recruit businesses I B. Responsibility Borough Council - Responsible for rescinding Business Tax and I budget adjustments; final approval of plans and proposals for new construction; use Borough newsletter as means to distribute/announce changes. I Borough Planning Commission - Recommends actions to Council; can assist in development of database, mapping and survey. I Business Association - Assist in development of mapping; inventory, database; develop program of downtown promotion. I Goal: Improve Physical Conditions "Downtown" I 1. Objective - Improve Appearance A. Implementation Actions: I Repair sidewalks I Land Use Plan, Page 89 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I Clean streets on regular basis Provide additional trash containers I Replace/rehab storefronts I B. Responsibility: Borough Council - Establish funding for street cleaning, sidewalk improvements; purchase and place additional trash containers; I develop commercial rehabilitation program. Business Association - Can assist, financially in purchase of trash I containers and possibly sidewalk repairs; members must participate in any rehab programs developed by Council. I Armstrong County - Funding source; technical assistance provider. PA Department of Community Affairs - Can provide technical and I financial assistance in all phases. 2. Objective - Improve Parking I A. Implementation Actions: Review existing parking facilities layout/location I Inventory and map existing spaces - "long term and short term" public and private I m Create parking authority Develop revised parking plans and locations ~I B. Responsibility: Borough Council - Final authority in approved revised plans; ~I authority for creating parking authority. Borough Planning Commission - Can assist in development of I mapping and inventory; can produce revised parking plans. Business Association - Assist in revised parking plan development; 1 assist in mapping and inventory of existing spaces. I 1 I Land Use Plan, Page 90 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

ACTION PIAN

Implementation of certain elements of the strategic plan should be proposed during the next fifteen [ 15) years of the Borough's existence. The "Action Plan" identifies goals and implementation actions, on a priority basis, and are subdivided into five (51 year periods. This plan realizes that may of these recommended elements, even though identified as a priority, will only be accomplished over time, as resources, both financial and personnel , become available.

As has been discussed previously, planning is a dynamic process and must be monitored by the Ford City Borough Planning Commission as the implementation of the plan progresses. Adjustments can be made to the plan to account for changes in developmental trends, environmental regulations or political activity. This Plan is not "etched in stone" and must be reviewed periodically to assure that it remains current and addresses the needs of the Borough.

Several objectives can be addressed concurrently within the initial five [5] year period which will indicate the Borough's intentions towards addressing the needs of its residents.

Planning is not completed in a vacuum. Any proposed actions which may affect the region should be submitted to the adjacent communities and the County Planning Department for comment and possible assistance in completing the activity.

Phase One (1 995-19991 Revise/update building codes.

Revise/update zoning ordinance [focus on re-use of former PPG site] Develop Capital Improvements Program [focus on services, facilities] Upgrade water treatment plant

Review existing parking arrangement/develop revised system as necessary

Develop Central Business District revitalization program [e.g. facade rehab, downtown revitalization, Main Street]

Action Plan, Page 91 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

+ Develop riverfront/scenic view overlay zone. I + Acquire property for creation/development of a community center. I 4 Acquire property to develop riverfront access. + Review existing recreation programs/facilities - develop upgraded facilities. I 4 Review existing Business Tax legislation for possible amendment. I plcase Two (200&2005) Review zoning ordinance for necessary revisions (focus on residential zones I and existing use of former PPG site. Update Capital Improvement Program. I Explore transportation improvements (e.g . widen 5th Avenue/reroute truck traffic]. I Complete user survey of Borough recreation sites - develop plan for expansion of facilities. I Develop a program for the expansion of the Borough library facilities.

Upgrade water distribution system. I

Create a Borough Redevelopment Authority which can be given the authority to manage and development structures/and properties to 1 increase the Borough tax base. Create Redevelopment Plan. I Monitor and participate in regional transportation plans. I Seek expansion of transit service. Develop historic preservation program. 1

Phse Tlcree (2006-2010) I + Explore regional land use planning program. 1 + Update Capital Improvement Program. + Develop inventory of historically-significant places and structures. 1 I Action Plan, Page 92 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PIAN

Complete housing survey to determine current housing needs - develop revisions to existing housing plan through Redevelopment Authority.

In all phases, it is recommended that the Borough actively seek and participate, to the maximum extent possible, in County, State and Federal D programs which provide funding, as well as technical, assistance for housing, I redevelopment, economic development and recreation activities. The planning process at any and every level, must establish a goal or goals, I which are the "desired ends" which stand as those items which should be met for the good of the local residents.

I The development of goals provides a guide from which the Borough can establish a "blue-print" of action which will guide the decision-making process on 1 future policies and plans.

Based on the research of existing conditions in the Borough, the review of existing plans and policies, the collection of data from a variety of sources, and the input of the Borough officials, boards and commissions, residents and Business Association, the following planning and development concepts were created.

As the Borough is almost entirely developed, the Land Use Plan identifies areas for improvements [such as the business district) and redevelopment [such as the former PPG site) rather than expansion. The plan establishes recommendations which include elements that address short-term actions which are feasible, as well as, long term policies.

A comprehensive development plan must take a realistic view of what goals and proposals are achievable. In order to gain that realistic perspective, the plan must review the possibilities for development activities, as well as the limitations for those same activities.

This plan was developed within the framework of the following constraints and opportunities:

Action Plan, Page 93 FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

o Constraints 1 There is little vacant land for future development (except for the PPG site] I The Borough is constricted on its western side by the Allegheny River; on its eastern side by a ridge-line 1 The denselydeveloped character of the Borough inhibits the potential for street widenings and other public improvements Some of the public utilities are aged and unreliable I The population base of the Borough is relatively old 1 Loss of business/eroding tax base o Opportunities I Ford City has a cohesive central Business District The Borough has a strong, active Business Association which can I develop and promote the business district as a viable commercial center The housing stock, while aging, is in relatively good condition with few I severely deteriorated structures Ford City is accessible - by highway, both local and regional and by river I This accessibility provides favorable conditions for industries Redevelopment opportunities remain in the Borough (for example, the 1 former PPG site) I With respect to those opportunities identified above, this plan will include proposals for long-term actions in relation to residential, commercial, industrial and public land-use patterns. Detailed recommendations will follow in the specific I plan elements. The major development concepts of Borough residents, officials, organizations and others concerned with Ford City are reflected in the following I list of goals and policies:

+ Rehabilitation of housing in needed areas I

+ Upgrading of central business district with physical improvements (facades, parking] I + De-emphasis of industrial uses I I Action Plan, Page 94 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I Revision and/or development of codes to require upkeep of properties The redirection of the Borough's financial capabilities to support needed I changes and facilities + Coordination with Armstrong County and the Commonwealth in funding and I implementing proposed improvements I The creation of an implementation plan designed to achieve those goals and objectives identified through the planning process is the "action" element of the I planning document. The word "action" implies the active participation of elected officials, appointed board and commission members, local organizations and residents, all working toward the specific goals and objectives formulated to I provide positive responses for the Borough.

I While some goals are designed to correct and abate identified deficiencies in the physical environment, such as traffic safety improvements or water treatment I facilities, other goals are proposed to address social and cultural needs, such as the development of a community center or the expansion of the library. This I range of issues, as well as the steps necessary to achieve the goal[s) defines the program of action for Borough Council. I I i I I I 1 I Action Plan, Page 95 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

I A Capital Improvement Program and budget involves the formation of a long-term plan for capital expenditures within the Borough. Capital expenditures include expenditures for buildings, land, major equipment, and other commodities I which are of significant value and have a useful life of several years. Up to this point in time, the Borough has not established any type of planning for capital I purchases and has purchased items on an as-needed basis.

By developing a Capital Improvement Program, the Borough can produce a I financial planning program which can focus on the necessary financing required for each calendar year, for each capital item to be purchased. Based on these I details, summaries of capital activity and financial requirements can be prepared.

The Capital Improvement budget is enacted each year, based on the Capital I Improvement Program. The budget can include enacting appropriators and/or authorizing bond issues in order to fund the improvements. The budget may vary I from the amount programmed. In some years, financial constraints may vary from the amount programmed. In some years, financial constraints may restrict the availability of the total amount programmed, while in other years, a surplus I may enable the Borough to begin projects programmed for future years. No matter what, however, the Capital Program must be updated after the enactment I of the capital budge in order to make adjustments in future years, as necessary, and to add a year of programming to replace the current year.

I The initial step in the development of a Capital Improvement Budget is to create the administrative responsibilities and policy framework as to who will be I responsible for creating the program and the guidelines used to form it. The next step is to prepare an inventory of existing facilities. This will help to indicate the I eventual need for renewal, replacement, expansion or removal of an item. After identifying existing projects, the next major step is to perform a Fiscal I Analysis of the Borough to determine its financial capabilities for major expenditures; and produce financial programming procedure, which consists of I the selection and scheduling of funding sources for these major expenditures. The most important issue to be determined by the Financial Analysis is to 1 come up with the level of expenditures that the Borough can afford over the next I Capital Improvement Program, Page 96 I FORD CilY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I

several years and to show its impact on the property tax rates and other Borough I revenues.

Once the fiscal and financial concerns have been reviewed and analyzed, the I formation of the specific program, with initial projects is next on the list. Project requests should be submitted from each department. The request must include a I statement of need and justification of the project, its cost and its proposed scheduling during the six-year period [typical time-line of a Capital Improvement Program]. I

Each request shall be checked for completeness, accuracy of information and I corrected as necessary. In evaluating proposed projects, emphasis should be placed on relative need and cost. Evaluation criteria can include: I + Achievement of existing plans and work programs + General benefits I + Cost and Tax rate impact + Acceptability to voters I + Legal requirement I Upon formation of the program and budget, Borough Council shall schedule a public hearing and then adopt the budget. It is also the responsibility of Borough Council to monitor the program and revise it as necessary based on the availability I of funding.

Some capital improvement projects which can be considered by the Borough at I this time include: purchase of police cruiser I purchase of dump truck (5ton] I purchase of dump truck [IO ton] water line replacement I fire hydrant replacement water treatment plant replacement/upgrade I separation of combined sewer/stormwater collection lines construction of ''community center" I I Capital Improvement Program, Page 97 I I FORD CrrY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I replacement/upgrade of recreation equipment/grounds paving of streets I construction of new parking facility

Possible funding sources available to assist in the completion of those projects I identified in the Capital Improvement Program can come from a myriad of sources at the County, State and Federal levels. In addition, there are a variety of local I and private resources available. A sample of these sources include: I Development: + PA Department of Commerce I J Ben Franklin Partnership J Business Infrastructure Development [BID] Grant I J Community Facilities J Site Development J Industrial Communities Action Program I d Industrial Communities Site Program + PA Department of Community Affairs I J Community Development Block Grant (Small Communities) J Downtown Pennsylvania Program I J Enterprise Zone PA Downtown Center I J Service Program I Municipal Resources + PA Department of Community Affairs [DCA] I J Heritage Parks J Parks and Recreation J Key93 I J State Planning Assistance Program J Regional Police Assistance Program I J Local Piggyback Purchasing Program [Service] J Council of Governments/lntermunicipal Projects Program I 4 Circuit Rider Program [2/more municipalities) d Home Program I Capital Improvement Program, Page 98 I I

J Housing and Community Development Program I J Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program J Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority (PennVEST] I J Main Street Program + PA Department of Transportation (PennDOT] I J Local Highway and Bridge Program J Local Road Turnback Program + PA Department of Environmental Resources (DER] I J Recycling Development and Implementation Grant Program J Rural Community Fire Protection Program 1 J Sewage Facilities Planning Grant Program J Sewage Treatment Plant Operations Grant Program I + PA Historical and Museum Commission

+ PA Emergency Management Agency (PEMA] I J Volunteer Fire Company Loan Assistance Program + US Department of Agriculture (USDA] I J Water and Waste Disposal Program I As noted earlier, there exist many, many funding programs for which application can be made, to assist in the completion of local activities. The above list is a small fraction of the programs available. Once the Borough determines I that project and/or service it wishes to undertake or provide, it must research available funding programs available for that type of project/service. Several I resources exist which should be contacted; including + Armstrong County Planning and Development Department 4 402 Market Street Kittanning, PA 16201 I This office can act as a resource center for County municipalities and can also provide the technical assistance necessary to help complete the paperwork. I + The Center for Rural Pennsylvania 212 Locust Street Suite 604 I Harrisburg, PA 17101 (717) 787-9555 I I Capital Improvement Program, Page 99 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I The Center produced "The Rural Access Guide," a publication which identifies existing assistance programs (financial, service, technical] for all facets of local I responsibility. In addition, the Center also has a resource list available of funding agencies. I + PA Department of Community Affairs Deputy Secretary for Programs Room 31 3,Forum Building ~I Harrisburg, PA 171 20 (71 7)787-2340 I The Department provides the widest variety and largest selection of funding assistance to local municipalities. A public is available which identifies the I available programs and describes eligibility criteria and contact persons. + Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs Robert Edwards, Executive Director I 2941 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 171 10 I (717) 236-9527 The Association has, on file, copies of existing regulations developed by I Boroughs throughout the Commonwealth. In addition, up to date information on proposed legislation is available. I Pennsylvania Rural Development Council Jesse Bloom, Executive Director 443 Hepburn Plaza I Williamsport, PA 17701 (7171 327-3435 I Another excellent source of information and "direction." No funding resources. I I 1 I I Capital Improvement Program, Page 100 I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMP REHENSlVE PLAN

FUNDING MECHANISMS

A major tool which many communities lack in their "tool box" for municipal management is a guide, or listing, of financial assistance programs which are available to help in the development of a myriad of municipal services, programs and activities for their residents.

There exist hundreds of county, state and federal financial assistance programs which can help local communities provide services and programs to residents. This section of the plan will identify some of the programs which are available to the Borough which can assist in the achievement of the identified goals.

Development RV~~~IMS 1. Ben Franklin Partnership - Pa. Department of Commerce 2. Business Infrastructure Development [BID] - Pa. Department of Commerce 3. Community Economic Recovery Program [CRP] - Pa. Department of Commerce 4. Industrial Communities Action Program - Pa. Department of Commerce 5. Industrial Communities Site Program [ICSP] - Pa. Department of Commerce 6. Pennsylvania Downtown Center - Pa. Downtown Center 7. Site Development Program - Pa. Department of Commerce

In addition to those identified above, a variety of funding programs exist for businesses, economic development districts, authorities, and non-profit businesses/corporation which are targeted to %pur" development within the Borough.

Cdtur,,ecreation 1. Historic Preservation Survey 6 Planning Grants - Pa. Historical 6 Museum Commission 2. Local Government Arts Grants - Pa. Council on the Arts

Funding Mechanisms, Page 101 I

3. Recreation Improvement and Rehabilitation Act [RIRA] - Pa. Department of I Community Affairs 4. Recreational Trail Program - Pa. Department of Environmental Resources I 5. Transportation Enhancements Program - Pa. Department of Transportation 6. Keystone Recreation, Park & Conservation Fund Program (Key '931 - Pa. I Department of Community Affairs 7. Land and Water Conservation Fund Program [LWCF] - Pa. Department of Community Affairs I

Management/Adtion I 1. Small Communities Planning Assistance Program [SCPAP] - Pa. Department of Community Affairs I 2. State Planning Assistance Program [SPAG] - Pa. Department of Community Affairs. I Several additional "service/technical assistance" programs exist in which the Borough can participate and gain valuable training. I I 1. Community Development Block Grant Program [CDEG] - Pa. Department of Community Affairs I 2. Community Facilities Program - Pa. Department of Community Affairs 3. Housing and Community Development Program - Pa. Department of I Community Affairs 4. Local Highway and Bridge Program - PennDOT I 5. Pa. Infrastructure Investment Authority - PennVEST 6. Rural Public Transportation Program - PennDOT I 7. Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program - Pa. Department of Community Affairs I 8. Sewage Facilities Planning Grants - Pa. Department of Environmental Resources I 9. Sewage Treatment Plant Operations Grants - Pa. Department of Environmental Resources I IO. Volunteer Fire Company Loan Assistance Program - PEMA I Funding Mechanisms, Page 102 I I FORD CITY BOROUGH - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I 11. Water and Waste Disposal - U.S.D.A. I In addition to the grant/loan programs identified above, there exist a variety of funding and "technical assistance" programs which the Borough can take advantage of , including human resources (education, health, job/training], I business development, municipal , municipal training and community leadership ~I program. Most of the programs identified in this Article are funding possibilities provided I by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. There are innumerable funding programs at the Federal level, as well as several technical assistance programs available I through the various departments at Armstrong County. I I I I I I I I I I I Funding Mechanisms, Page 103 I 1 I I I I I I I ...... I I ...... I I I I I I I I I DataPlan Inc.

PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

MEMORANDUM

TO: FORD CITY BOROUGH COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION AND ZONING HEARING BOARD

FROM: JIM GAGLIANO, JR., DATAPLAN, INC.

SUBJECT: PUBLIC MEETING REPORT

DATE: MARCH 23,1995 I Enclosed, please find the results of the Public Meeting that was held on Wednesday, March 8th. I feel that the meeting was valuable in getting those people that attended, involved in the process. There was good communication that evening and we were 1 able to focus on some positive items, as well as identify several areas which need to be addressed.

I I am also enclosing a copy of the sign-in sheet so that you may send copies of the report to those individuals who attended and do not sit on any of the Borough boards.

1 Should you have any questions or additional comments, please do no hesitate to I contact me. I I I 1

I Appendix, Page 104 1 DataPlan Inc. I PLANNINQ AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I

FORD CITY PUBLIC MEETING REPORT

As part of the development process for the Ford City Borough Comprehensive Plan update, a public meeting was held on Wednesday, March 8, 1995 at the Borough Building. The purpose of this meeting was to gather input from Borough residents in reference to existing Borough conditions, needs and perceived problems. . A total of eighteen (18) residents attending the meeting, which is more than expected, considering the fact that the area had five inches (5'')of snow during the day. After a brief discussion of the planning processing and a synopsis of the Plan update, the residents were divided into three (3) groups and each given the task of identifying activities, conditions, situations, etc., that they perceived to be "strengths" and "weaknesses" of the Borough. Each group was given a period of time to develop their list, and each then reported to the entire "class" what they felt were areas of concern and approval within the Borough. By breaking the overall class into groups and then having each report (its findings) back to the class helps in the forming of a consensus, or agreement, as to the pluses and minuses of the community, and further assists in the development of the goals and objectives, which will become a major part of the Comprehensive Plan update. This report will identify the comments of each group and then focus on those comments which appear to be, or are similar. These similar comments will be identified the consensus of the "class."

Appendix, Page 105 1 I I I Group #I Strengths: I Residents care about the welfare and well-being of each other Ethnic heritage I Closeness of community Youth organizations I Business Association Property - owners pride in Borough - well-kept m Accessibility to Pittsburgh Low crime rate I Educational system Vo-tech school River Historical perspective Weaknesses Lack of code enforcement on rental properties Existing land use regulations (need revised I Lack of available land (for development) Lack of community center I Dependence on one industry Unionism I Lack of technology Safe recreation areas I I

I Appendix, Page 106 I I I I I

Group #2 1 Strengths Public Services - everything "works" I Neat, clean community - property owners pride Education system - Vo-tech I Clean environment 1 Access to Pittsburgh Active Business Association 1 Willingness of neighbors to work together Weaknesses I Street conditions Sidewalk conditions I Lack of parking Water plant - outdated and costly 1 Water quality Business tax I Lack of community involvement Loss of tax base I I I I

Appendix, Page 107 I I Group #3 Strengths I Safe Clean I Friendly Library I "Heritage Days" I Low-cost uti Iit ies Educated population I Weaknesses No river frontage I Aging population Water facility I Lack of expansion space Eroding tax base 11 Loss of businesses I Cost of water I I I

I Appendix, Page 108 I

After the reports of each group, discussion followed towards the agreement of I several items: This "consensus building" helps in the development of a plan that will address recomized concerns. I Strengths that were agreed upon included: b A close-knit community - people care about each other I b The business owners and Business Association are very interested in the Borough I b The Borough has good access to Pittsburgh b The Borough has very good access to the Allegheny River I b The school system, especially the Vo-tech, is a positive influence on the residents b The Borough does provide "affordable housing" for those who may need it I b The fact that the required infrastructure for development, specifically sewer and water, is already in place I Weaknesses that reached some consensus included: b The lack of developable land I b The loss of several businesses b The eroding of the tax base I b The water treatment facilities quality of water (lack of treatment) I outdated facilities cost of water I b The existence of the Business Tax In reviewing the weaknesses, most of the "concerns" focused on the economic viability of the Borough, and the loss of businesses and lack of developable areas. I Out of this initial meeting, the only item which would be considered "physical," was the water treatment facility and distribution lines. At this time, the Borough is in the I process of applying for funding to address this concern. Other comments received which could play a major roles in the future of the I Borough dealt with the lack of code enforcement and community involvement in Borough programs. Both of these items are necessary to maintain a safe, viable living environment. I In addition to the comments generated at the public meeting, some written comments were submitted to the Planning Commission. Those comments included: I

Appendix, Page 109 1 I I

I b Joy over the handicapped ramps that have been installed b Concern over proposed widening of 5th Avenue I speed will increase lighting on 5th Avenue in inadequate in spots I b Instead of widening 5th Avenue, possibly place "No Parking" signs on the Avenue b Re-establish "Crossing Guards" at High School I b Possibly re-route truck traffic off 5th Avenue to 2nd Avenue b Residents feel "alienated" from Council - they want more of a personal touch - I many residents would like to see suggestion boxes or polls for certain issues b Water pressure at hydrants in inadequate - fire hazard I b Many people are purchasing bottled water to drink - Ford City water is of poor quality. The submitted comments, generally, were in concert with those provided at the I meeting, focusing on parking, community involvement (or lack thereof) and water I quality (and quantity). I I I I I I I I

I Appendix, Page 110 I I DataPlan Inc.

PUNNINQ AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I

I FORD CITY BOROUGH I ATTITUDE SURVEY MAY 1994

I Instructions: Mark each response in space provided below for appropriate category. I STA TISTICAL INFORMATION I 1. My current age is: I I 3 I 5 I 10 I 8 I 19 1 . Additional response: age 16 I 2. I have been a resident of Ford City Borough for: I 0-4 years I 5-12 years I 13-25 years I 26-40 years I over 40 yead ~ ~~ I 7 3 I 3 6 I 27 I 3. I own my home. I Yes I No I I 34 12 4. I own other property in the Borough. I Yes I No 1 Residential Commercial 1 I 5 40 4 5. I have been employed in Ford City: I 0-6 7 yrs or over Retired Unemployed Work out of area 7 5 17 8 7 I . Noanswer: 2

1 Appendix, Page 111 I I I Strongly Agree Agree Don't Know Disagree Strongly Disagree I1 14 11 6 3 ~~~ ~~ I Noanswer: 1

7. The creation of new jobs should be a concern of local government. I Strongly Agree Agree Don't Know Disagree Strongly Disagree 24 17 2 3 5 I

8. Armstrong County should take an active role in the marketing and redevelopment I of the former PPG site.

~ Strongly Agree Agree Don't Know Disagree Strongly Disagree I 15 17 3 5 5 Noanswer: 1 I 9. A long range development plan for Ford City Borough should be the first step toward revitalizing the community. I I Stronnlv Agree I Agree I Don't Know I Disagree I Strongly Disagree I 19 1- 21 2 1 2 1 1

IO. Since it may be years before the former PPG site is environmentally safe and I because public access may never occur, alternative riverfront development should be considered. I Stronnlv Anree I Agree I Don't Know I Disagree I Strongly Disagree I I -- 7- 23 7 4 3 I I Strongly Agree Agree Don't Know Disagree Strongly Disagree 10 20 8 4 2

~ . Noanswer: 2 I

12. The former PPG site should be developed for light industrial use and additional job opportunities. I I Stronnlv Anree 1 Agree I Don't Know I Disagree I Strongly Disagree I I I-- 11 1 24 I 2 3 4 Noanswer: 4 Appendix, Page 112 I I I

I 12.A The former PPG site should be developed as a mixed-use residential and commercial center. I Strongly Agree Agree Don't Know Disagree Strongly Disagree 5 13 9 10 5 ,I 12.B The former PPG site should be developed as a residential neighborhood with a I variety of housing types. I Stronnlv Anree I Agree I Don't Know I Disagree I Strongly Disagree I I 3 13 4 14 9 1 I 12.C The former PPG site should be developed as a commercial recreation and 11 specialty retail center. I Stronglv Agree I Agree I Don't Know 1 Disagree I Strongly Disagree 1 I I 5 I 15 I 8 I 13 I 4 I Noanswer: 1 Comment: All #I2 ideas seem alright. But more jobs are needed in the area. Tear !I it down and start over. 13. Ford City Borough needs to seek funding from both public and private sources to I assist in the redevelopment of the former PPG site. Strongly Agree Agree Don't Know Disagree Strongly Disagree I 10 21 5 5 3 Noanswer: 2

I 14. The Borough should focus it's resources on attracting new companies to the MACADO Industrial Park.

I Strongly Agree Agree Don't Know Disagree Strongly Disagree 7 19 6 6 6 I . Noanswer: 2

15. When the former PPG site has been satisfactorily cleaned-up, it should remain I as open space along the river, with public access. I Strongly Agree I Agree I Don't Know I Disagree I Strongly Disagree I I 5 I 12 I 7 I 16 I 4 I I ~ -~ Noanswer: 2

I Appendix, Page 113 I I I

Strongly Agree Agree Don't Know Disagree Strongly Disagree 2 8 11 11 11 I I

General Comments - 46 surveys completed All comments are taken directly from the survey forms with no editing, grammatical 1 corrections or spelling corrections. Questions dealing with a specific number on the survey, are listed directly below that question. Other general comments are listed I below: Nice to find out what people think. I Cooler heads should prevail for people of Ford City. I These questions are not clear. It is very hard to understand for me and many other residents which will result in the truth. I Jobs

I feel that newjobs should be created for the public. I

I fee/ that Ford City needs something big to start again. How about Electronic Comoanies? Computer work. There are - Apple, ISM, Hewlet Packard looking I for places to relocate. Why not Ford City. I understand they were in Texas looking and studying. Why not Ford City - A great place like Ford City needs 1 great work for a lot of people - like PPG gave us. I don't feel a lot of little things need to come in - neither should we let building more apartments come in for the aged. We need to bring in and keep the young again! I PPG site I I should be all for more jobs, Ford City is depressed as it is.

I think the site should be used to bring new business into town. Maybe some I type of mall or maybe even some kind of place for young kids to be able to go, have fun without getting into trouble. I Let PPG pay the taxes they should pay, they got tax break to stay here and did not live up to there promize, to the boro, county, or workers they all gave consessions. And what did PPG do, I think they are trying to dump there I contaminated property, with little as possiable clean up. MACADO is just a big Appendix, Page 114 1 I I

1 joke, look what's there now. Try to get a decent industry give them the tax break. If anybody. Let PPG hold it and pay the taxes they will find a buyer. I Let's not let this be a burden like MACADO and a dump like MACADO. Make a small portion of the land available to Armstrong Habitat for Humanities. Another possibility would be a specialty area designed to bring in tourists and I new business - somewhat like Church Street Station in Orlando, Fla. I Wish they would do something. I think that FCHS should take it over and build - (examples) football fields - tennis I courts - track field - public walking access. I II I

,I ~I I I I 1 I

I Appendix, Page 115