THE ACTIVE PRINCIPLE in STOIC PHILOSOPHY Håvard Løkke

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE ACTIVE PRINCIPLE in STOIC PHILOSOPHY Håvard Løkke CHAPTER TWO THE ACTIVE PRINCIPLE IN STOIC PHILOSOPHY Håvard Løkke Introduction Unlike the contemporary Epicureans, the ancient Stoics believed that there exists an active principle that governs the cosmos in accordance with a rational plan. Th is is, in our parlance, a metaphysical belief. But whereas Aristotle’s works aft er the Hellenistic era were edited in such a way that a part of his philosophy came to be called metaphysics, this did not happen to the Stoics. So in order to get as clear as we can on the Stoics’ views and arguments on the active principle, we must turn to the part of their philosophy called physics. Th e Stoics divided philosophical inquiry into three parts. In addition to physics, there was one part dealing with ethics and another with logic. All Stoics agreed that these parts are closely related. But there was some disagreement as to what the relations are. Some Stoics said that if philosophy were a garden, physics would be its trees, ethics its fruits, and logic its surrounding wall; others said that if philosophy were an egg, physics would be its yolk, ethics its white, and logic its shell.1 Whatever we make of these analogies, it is clear that physics is a central subject in Stoic philosophy. But it should also be clear that most of the Stoics did not study physics for its own sake alone; at least Chrysippus (ca. 280–205 BC), the third school-arch of the Stoa, held that one should not approach Stoic ethics without having fi rst heard at least the main points in Stoic physics.2 Further, all Stoics agreed that physics is itself subdivided. But again there was some disagreement as to what the subparts are. On one view, physics is made up of fi ve topics: “On bodies”, “On principles”, “On elements”, “On gods”, and “On limits, place, and void”; on a diff erent 1 Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.39–40; LS 26B. 2 Plutarch, On Stoic Self-Contradictions 1035b–d. 50 håvard løkke view, it consists of three subparts: “On the cosmos”, “On the elements”, and “Th e inquiry into causes”.3 Whatever we make of this disagreement, it is clear that four notions are of key importance in Stoics physics: body, principle, element, and causation. My discussion in this paper is focused on these four notions—plus one that does not make up a separate topic, namely the notion of pneuma. Pneuma is a physical stuff that is made up of the elements fi re and air; on the Stoic view, it is the vehicle of the active principle, the reason that governs the cosmos and with which we human beings ought to govern our lives. As is well known, our evidence for early Stoic philosophy is quite poor. Th ere is in fact a lot of material bearing on nearly all parts of Stoic philosophy, but the main problem is that much of this material is made up by polemical attacks from hostile adversaries and hence only indirect testimony, at best. Having said that, our evidence for Stoic physics is relatively good, and maybe better than our evidence for any other part of their philosophy except ethics. Th is is mainly because we are so fortunate as to have two complete (or nearly complete) ancient texts bearing on the issue. One is Seneca’s Natural Questions, written, it seems, in 62–65 AD. Th e other text is a book on astronomy, now known as Th e Heavens, written by a Stoic called Cleomedes, prob- ably mid-second century AD.4 Th ere is also much useful information about Stoic physics in ancient doxographers, like Diogenes Laertius and Johannes Stobaeus. So we have enough evidence to piece together a picture of the Stoics’ views and arguments on the active principle. Yet, it is only fair to add that the access we now have to Stoic physics is limited; it is as if we had to piece together Aristotle’s physics from his Meteorology and a few isolated doctrinal reports, without having either the Physics or the De anima. Here is how I proceed in trying to create as comprehensive a picture as possible. First I briefl y sketch the historical background and con- text out of which I believe the Stoic position arose. Th en I look at the notion of body, which the Stoics seem to regard as the pivotal one in their theory. Th is leads to a discussion of that into which body can be analyzed, i.e. the active and the passive principle, and that out of which a body is made up, i.e. the four elements. And this in turn leads to a discussion of pneuma, the bodily vehicle of the active principle, which 3 Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.132; LS 43B. 4 See Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy..
Recommended publications
  • KEIMPE ALGRA 155-184.Qxd
    Ο Ζήνων ο Κιτιέας και η Στωική κοσμολογία: μερικές σημειώσεις και δυο συγκεκριμένες περιπτώσεις. KEIMPE ALGRA Η έκταση και η φύση της συμβολής του Ζήνωνα στη Στωική φυσική και κοσμολογία είναι δύσκολο να θεμελιωθούν. Η ανακοίνωση αυτή μελετά μερικά από τα σχετικά προβλήματα. Η χρήση της ονομαστικής ετικέτας "Ζήνων" από τις αρχαίες μας πηγές δε θα πρέπει πάντα να αξιολογείται επιφανειακά, και η απόδοση καθώς και η διευθέτηση του υλικού του Hans Von Arnim στο Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta (SVF) δε θα πρέπει να γίνεται αποδεκτή χωρίς κριτική, για λόγους που περιγράφονται σ’ αυτή την εργασία. Παρέχονται δύο συγκεκριμένες περιπτώσεις αποσπασμάτων, οι οποίες, με μια πιο προσεκτική ματιά, δε θα πρέπει να αποδοθούν στο Ζήνωνα. Τελικά, υποστηρίζεται ότι ο Ζήνων δεν ήταν παραγωγικός συγγραφέας σε θέματα φυσικής, και ότι έτυχε στους διαδόχους του ( σε μερικούς από αυτούς) – πιο συγκεκριμένα στον Σφαίρο, στον Κλεάνθη και στον Χρύσιππο – να επεξεργαστούν περαιτέρω και να συγκροτήσουν λεπτομερειακά την φυσική κοσμοεικόνα της Στωικής σχολής. Αυτό σημαίνει πως υπάρχουν περιθώρια ανάπτυξης της φυσικής και της κοσμολογίας στα πλαίσια του αρχαίου Στωικισμού, και πως, συνακόλουθα, είναι ζωτικής σημασίας να διακρίνουμε πιο ξεκάθαρα, απ’ ότι συνήθως, τι πρέπει με ασφάλεια να αποδοθεί στο Ζήνωνα και ότι τέτοιου είδους "κοινά στωικά" δόγματα πρέπεί μόνο πιθανά, ή μερικά, να ανιχνευτούν σ΄αυτόν. Zeno of Citium and Stoic Cosmology: some notes and two case studies KEIMPE ALGRA 1 Zeno of Citium, as indeed the early Stoics in general, conceived of philosophy as consisting of three interrelated parts: logic, physics and ethics.1 But although Zeno’s foundational work covered all three areas, he appears to have had his preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Logic and Reality: a Stoic Perspective (Spring 2013)
    Language Logic and Reality: A Stoic Perspective Aaron Tuor History of Lingustics WWU Spring 2013 1 Language, Logic, and Reality: A Stoic perspective Contents 1 Introduction: The Tripartite Division of Stoic Philosophy.............................3 2 Stoic Physics...................................................................................................4 3 Stoic Dialectic.................................................................................................4 3.1 A Stoic Theory of Mind: Logos and presentations..........................4 3.2 Stoic Philosophy of Language: Lekta versus linguistic forms.........6 3.3 Stoic Logic.......................................................................................7 3.3.1 Simple and Complex Axiomata........................................7 3.3.2 Truth Conditions and Sentence Connectives....................8 3.3.3 Inference Schemata and Truths of Logic..........................9 3.4 Stoic Theory of Knowledge.............................................................10 3.4.1 Truth..................................................................................10 3.4.2 Knowledge........................................................................11 4 Conclusion: Analysis of an eristic argument..................................................12 4.1 Hermogenes as the Measure of "Man is the measure."...................13 Appendix I: Truth Tables and Inference Schemata...........................................17 Appendix II: Diagram of Communication.........................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Stoic Enlightenments
    Copyright © 2011 Margaret Felice Wald All rights reserved STOIC ENLIGHTENMENTS By MARGARET FELICE WALD A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in English written under the direction of Michael McKeon and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October 2011 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Stoic Enlightenments By MARGARET FELICE WALD Dissertation Director: Michael McKeon Stoic ideals infused seventeenth- and eighteenth-century thought, not only in the figure of the ascetic sage who grins and bears all, but also in a myriad of other constructions, shaping the way the period imagined ethical, political, linguistic, epistemological, and social reform. My dissertation examines the literary manifestation of Stoicism’s legacy, in particular regarding the institution and danger of autonomy, the foundation and limitation of virtue, the nature of the passions, the difference between good and evil, and the referentiality of language. Alongside the standard satirical responses to the ancient creed’s rigor and rationalism, seventeenth- and eighteenth-century poetry, drama, and prose developed Stoic formulations that made the most demanding of philosophical ideals tenable within the framework of common experience. Instead of serving as hallmarks for hypocrisy, the literary stoics I investigate uphold a brand of stoicism fit for the post-regicidal, post- Protestant Reformation, post-scientific revolutionary world. My project reveals how writers used Stoicism to determine the viability of philosophical precept and establish ways of compensating for human fallibility. The ambivalent status of the Stoic sage, staged and restaged in countless texts, exemplified the period’s anxiety about measuring up to its ideals, its efforts to discover the plenitude of ii natural laws and to live by them.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters from a Stoic Chapters
    Letters From A Stoic Chapters Scarey Udell balances beyond while Dion always inchoate his sulphurations plats debasingly, he unbalances so despondently. Vincent reindustrializes polygamously as muggiest Will circumstances her appropriations famish abandonedly. Tight-fisted and underhanded Lazare canalising her scudding plaits while Niven whacks some funny synchronistically. Modern introductions to Stoic philosophy as a knot of life. Spirit down before these letters from? Ch 1 An Essay in Interpretation In all chapter Engberg-Pederson situates his importance among the. Dodgson during slumber, than from one by ferriss tips on. Study Flashcards On Lord cause the Flies Vocabulary Chapters 1-3 at Cramcom Quickly memorize the. A Field grow to a sinister Life 53 Brief Lessons for Living UK title The Stoic Guide alongside a crap Life. He says that event like a sound practices, if you demand attention. Stoics did when it demands, pigliucci offers one is finite is an interconnected disciplines required to a chapter? He is from each! The Roman Stoics Self Responsibility and Affection. Letters from a Stoic by Seneca The John Lennon Letters by John Lennon Yoko Ono Tim Ferriss Harvard Business Review Paw. Arranged thematically in chapters about the topics of judgement externals perspective. Meditations by Marcus Aurelius stoic philosopher and roman emperor Letters from a Stoic by Seneca the. There appeared that from provocations to love is no man is pleasure which prosperity has arranged upon. Stoic Html Seneca Letters Stoic Html Learn what about using the public. So you have a definite purposes. Those who discovered by loving embrace our sense. Detail of thread of chapters 6- of that book The Physical World case the Greeks 1956 Sambursky's account of Stoic physics is also welcome for its own merits for exclude is marked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stoics and the Practical: a Roman Reply to Aristotle
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2013 The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle Robin Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Robin, "The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle" (2013). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 143. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/143 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STOICS AND THE PRACTICAL: A ROMAN REPLY TO ARISTOTLE A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2013 BY Robin Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, IL - TABLE OF CONTENTS - Introduction……………………..............................................................................................................p.i Chapter One: Practical Knowledge and its Others Technê and Natural Philosophy…………………………….....……..……………………………….....p. 1 Virtue and technical expertise conflated – subsequently distinguished in Plato – ethical knowledge contrasted with that of nature in
    [Show full text]
  • Seneca's Concept of a Supreme Being in His Philosophical Essays and Letters Robert James Koehn Loyola University Chicago
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1947 Seneca's Concept of a Supreme Being in His Philosophical Essays and Letters Robert James Koehn Loyola University Chicago Recommended Citation Koehn, Robert James, "Seneca's Concept of a Supreme Being in His Philosophical Essays and Letters" (1947). Master's Theses. Paper 641. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/641 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1947 Robert James Koehn SENECA'S CONCEPT OF A SUPRE.'ME BEING IN HIS PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAYS AND LETTERS BY ROBERT J. KOEHN, S.J. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF ~qE REQUIREMENTS FOR A MASTER OF ARTS DEGREE IN THE CLASSICS AUGUST 1947 VITA AUCTORIS Robert James Koehn was born in Toledo, Ohio, on September 2, 1917. After attending St. James parochial school, he entered st. John's High School in September 1931. Upon his graduation in 1935 he attended St. John's and DeSales Colleges before entering the So­ ciety of Jesus on September 1, 1937. He matriculated at Xavier University, Cincinnati, and received a Bachelor of Li­ terature degree in June 1941. Following his transfer to West Baden College, West Baden Springs, Indiana, in the summer of 1941, he entered the graduate school of Loyola Uni­ versity, Chicago, in the Classics.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLACE of THEORY in the OLD STOA Masters of Philosophy Thesis
    THE PLACE of THEORY in the OLD STOA Masters of Philosophy Thesis in Systematic Philosophy John E. Hull Sponsoring Senior Members Dr. Hendrik Hart Institute for Christian Studies May 22, 1975 Acknowledgments Completing a masters level program involves much more than writing a thesis. Now that the thesis has been born with the normal amount of labour, I am reminded how my pursuit of an academic training was conceived in turmoil; even gestation was plagued with doubts and frustrations as well as being fruitfully blessed. Thus, I am very grateful to those who have inspired and en­ couraged me in my work, especially John Vander Stelt and John Van Dyk at Dordt College, and Drs. Henk Hart and A1 Wolters at I.C.S. The latter were also helpful in offering advice for this particular paper. Dr. Wolters assistance in bibliographical and translation matters was particularly invaluable. I also wish to express my thanks to Lambert Zuidervaart and Jean Zinkand for their suggestions on composition and style. I owe a special debt of thanks to Dorothy Huisman for typing the manuscript. The factuality of this thesis was no less exist- entially dependent upon the support of my "at-home", Glenda, and the patient membership of the Association for the Advancement of Christian Scholarship. Without their respective contributions none of this would be. Abbreviations AFL Ancient Formal Logic, Bochenski AGP Archiv fur die Geschichte der Philosophie AGW Abend1andischen der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft zu Gottingen AM Adversus Mathematicos, Sextus Empiricus ASPW Aristotle's System of the Physical World, Solman CHR Chrysippe, Biehier CN de Communibus notitiis, Plutarchus CQ Classical Quarterly DASN Die Alter?.
    [Show full text]
  • Rational Impressions and the Stoic Philosophy of Mind Chapter 11, History of Philosophy of Mind: Pre-Socratics to Augustine, Ed
    Rational Impressions and the Stoic Philosophy of Mind Chapter 11, History of Philosophy of Mind: Pre-Socratics to Augustine, ed. John Sisko Vol. 1 of six-volume series The History of the Philosophy of Mind, eds. Rebecca Copenhaver and Christopher Shields, Acumen Publishing (forthcoming) Vanessa de Harven, UMass Amherst Abstract: This paper seeks to elucidate the distinctive nature of the rational impression on its own terms, asking precisely what it means for the Stoics to define logikē phantasia as an impression whose content is expressible in language. I argue first that impression, generically, is direct and reflexive awareness of the world, the way animals get information about their surroundings. Then, that the rational impression, specifically, is inherently conceptual, inferential, and linguistic, i.e. thick with propositional content, the way humans receive incoming information from the world. When we suspend certain contemporary assumptions about propositional content, the textual evidence can be taken at face value to reveal why, for the Stoics, rational impressions are called thoughts (noēseis) and how the Stoics’ novel semantic entities called lekta (roughly, the meanings of our words) depend on rational impressions for their subsistence. At the heart of Stoic philosophy of mind is the rational impression (logikē phantasia). As it happens, the Stoics think that the mind resides in the heart, but this is not what makes the Stoic account interesting; seating the mind in the heart is a commonplace for the time. What sets the Stoics apart is their focus on mental phenomena of soul (psychē) over Aristotle’s physiological mechanisms, and on semantic content over Plato’s desiderative psychology — all of which begins with the rational impression.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleanthes Or Posidonius? the Basis of Stoic Physics
    CLEANTHES OR POSIDONIUS? THE BASIS OF STOIe PHYSICS BY FRIEDRICH SOLMSEN MEDEDELINGEN DER KONINKLIJKE NEDERLANDSE AKADEMIE VAN WETENSCHAPPEN, AFD. LETTERKUNDE NIEUWE REEKS. DEEL 24, No. 9 1961 N. V. NOORD-HOLLANDSCHE UITGEVERS MAATSCHAPPIJ AMSTERDAM AANGEBODEN IN DE VERGADERING VAN II SEPTEMBER 1961 The first thesis àf Stoic theology to be proved in Book 11 of Cicero's De natura deorum is esse deos 1). The proofs are of the most diverse kind. Some are dialectical in the sense of operating with lY~o~a, others are severely rational with an emphasis on syllogistic stringency, and still others may be classed as "physical" inasmuch as they are drawn from a consideration df the Cosmos and a theory regarding the basic substance or power at work in it. The chapters embodying these proofs have often been anal~ed and there has been a considerable amount of discussion about the source or sources from which Cicero derived these proofs 2). We wish here to concentrate on a relatively small section in this first part of Book 11 and to examine once more the question of its source. The arguments of this section (11, 23-32 mundum) are distinctly of the "physical" type 3); all of them lead us to recognize the significance of one particular vis, the vis caloris. From this concept we arrive in the end by a brief and simple step at the Stoic idea of the deity. In the first two paragraphs (23f.) the vis caloris is Been to be the agent of growth in all plants and animals 4); physiologioal observations here presented acquaint us with the manifestations and the effects of this power.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria Loren Kerns George Fox University, [email protected]
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University George Fox Evangelical Seminary 2013 Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria Loren Kerns George Fox University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Church History Commons Recommended Citation Kerns, Loren, "Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria" (2013). George Fox Evangelical Seminary. Paper 6. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes/6 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in George Fox Evangelical Seminary by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. Kings College London Platonic and Stoic Passions in Philo of Alexandria A Dissertation submitted to The School of Arts and Humanities In Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theology and Religious Studies By Loren Kerns London, United Kingdom July 2013 Copyright by Loren Kerns, 2013 All rights reserved. Abstract Philo of Alexandria forged his theory of the soul and its passions while expositing the meaning of Torah. Though writing as a Jewish teacher and disciple of Moses, his biblical reflections display a strong orientation toward Middle-Platonic philosophy. On the topic of the soul and its passions, however, Philo also exhibits significant Stoic influence. The introduction notes Philo’s apparent incompatible use of both the complex Platonic and the monistic Stoic psychological models. After assessing the degree to which Philo understood 'passion' to be a type of Stoic impulse or opinion (chapter one), chapter two demonstrates that Philo consistently drew upon the Stoics’ depiction of all passions as irrational, excessive, and unnatural.
    [Show full text]
  • Katja Vogt Stoic Virtue&Happiness.Pages
    Katja Maria Vogt, katjavogt.com, Columbia University "1 The Virtues and Happiness in Stoic Ethics, for ed. Chris Bobonich, Cambridge Companion to Ancient Ethics The Virtues and Happiness in Stoic Ethics1 ! ! The Stoics hold that virtue is knowledge, and that knowledge is one: the good state of the rational soul. Unlike the rest of us, a person who is in this state of mind is happy. Today and throughout much of antiquity, Stoic ethics is compared to Platonic and Aristotelian views. The Stoics’ immediate interlocutors, however, are skeptics.2 With them the Stoics discuss how hard it is to think straight, to arrive at carefully considered views and stable insights. The skeptics regularly suspend judgment, assessing disputes as unresolved. The questions of what is good and bad and how to live appear to them difficult and deserving of extensive study.3 The Stoics largely agree with the skeptics: these questions appear to them to be in need of further investigation. The Stoic approach is to ask what a person would be like who has the answers: how she would think, feel, and act. ! A brief disclaimer. “The Stoics” as I speak of them never existed. Instead, there were individual philosophers. Stoic philosophy begins with Zeno (334/3-262/1 BCE), who spent more than twenty years in Plato’s Academy, developing his views in conversation with the then emerging Academic skepticism (Zeno was roughly 20-30 years older than 1 I am grateful to Jens Haas, Sam McVane, and Nandi Theunissen for comments. 2 On the closeness of skeptic and Stoic philosophy, cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoic Physics
    The Stoics | οἱ Στωικοί Coursework 4 Stoic Physics For the Stoics, physics deals with everything related to the universe and the things in it. This includes not only physics as we understand it today, but also cosmology, the body, the soul, and the gods. The selections aim to provide a general overview of physics, but also point up issues for further discussion in class: cosmic cycles and conflagration, pneuma and tenor, mixture, and the soul. We will discuss further central physical topics in the sixth session, namely fate, determinism, and causation. If you are interested in Stoic theology, the best exposition is probably in Cicero’s On the Nature of the Gods, Book II. 44A 1. Explain the difference between ‘whole’ (ὅλον, holon) and ‘all’ (πᾶν, pan). 44BCD 2. What are the two principles of the universe, and what are their roles? 46ABC 3.* What are ‘seminal principles’ (σπερματικοὶ λόγοι, spermatikoi logoi)? 46IJ 4. Pick one the arguments for conflagration and sketch it. (See also 47C.) 47AB 5. Make a list of the elements, their features, and interrelations. 47C 6.* Try to summarise the argument that begins with heat and ends with the claim that the world is god. 47OPQ 7. Explain the difference between ‘tenor’ (ἕξις, hexis), ‘physique’ (φύσις, phusis), ‘soul’ (ψυχή, psuchê), and ‘commanding faculty’ (ἡγεμονικόν, hêgemonikon). (See also 53B.) 48 8. Identify the three kinds of mixture, and briefly explain them. 9.* Which is the most relevant kind of mixture, and why? 52 10. What are your thoughts about the eternal recurrence of the world? Do you find this plausible? Do you see how this follows from other Stoic doctrines? 53 11.
    [Show full text]