DOCSLIB.ORG

IVY STATION, CULVER CITY Mixed-Use Transit Oriented Development (TOD) at Washington Blvd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IVY STATION, CULVER CITY Mixed-Use Transit Oriented Development (TOD) at Washington Blvd IVY STATION, CULVER CITY Mixed-Use Transit Oriented Development (TOD) At Washington Blvd. and National Blvd. Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for Prepared by FINAL DRAFT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Ivy Station Washington and National Mixed Use Transit Oriented Development Prepared for: Lowe Enterprises Real Estate Group 11777 San Vicente Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90049 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 660 South Figueroa Street Suite 2050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 3 I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Project Description ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Study Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 6 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................... 9 Study Area .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Existing Street System................................................................................................................................. 11 Existing Traffic Volumes.............................................................................................................................. 13 Level of Service Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 13 City of Culver City Significant Impact Criteria .............................................................................................. 14 City of Los Angeles Significant Impact Criteria ............................................................................................ 14 Existing (2014) Conditions LOS Analysis ...................................................................................................... 14 Existing Transit Lines .................................................................................................................................. 17 III. PROJECT CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................................... 21 Project Trip Generation............................................................................................................................... 21 Project Trip Credits ..................................................................................................................................... 21 Project Trip Distribution .............................................................................................................................. 21 Existing (2014) With Project Conditions LOS ............................................................................................... 25 Related Projects Trip Generation and Assignment ...................................................................................... 27 Cumulative (2019) Base Conditions ............................................................................................................. 32 Cumulative (2019) Without Project Conditions LOS..................................................................................... 32 Cumulative (2019) With Project Conditions LOS .......................................................................................... 35 Driveway Access Review ............................................................................................................................. 38 Driveway Queueing Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 38 Bicycle Network .......................................................................................................................................... 38 Project Impacts ........................................................................................................................................... 38 Recommended Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................................... 39 Neighborhood Traffic Assessment .............................................................................................................. 39 Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Compliance ...................................................................................... 40 Freeway Impact Screening Analysis ............................................................................................................ 41 Freeway Mainline Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 41 Freeway Ramp Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 42 IV. CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................... 43 Washington and National Transit Oriented Development Final Draft Traffic Impact Analysis 1 October 2015 TABLE OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 – VICINITY AND PROJECT LOCATION MAP ...................................................................................................... 7 FIGURE 2 – PROJECT SITE PLAN .................................................................................................................................. 8 FIGURE 3 – PROJECT INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATION AND TRAFFIC CONTROL ..................................................... 10 FIGURE 4 – EXISTING (2014) AM (PM) PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES .................................................... 15 FIGURE 5 – EXISTING PROJECT AREA TRANSIT SERVICE MAP ....................................................................................... 18 FIGURE 6 – PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES FOR ALL LAND USES ............................................................... 23 FIGURE 7 – PROJECT AM (PM) PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES ............................................................... 24 FIGURE 8 – EXISTING (2014) WITH PROJECT AM (PM) PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES ............................. 26 FIGURE 9 – 1-MILE RADIUS RELATED PROJECTS LOCATION ......................................................................................... 30 FIGURE 10 – RELATED PROJECTS AM (PM) PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES ............................................. 31 FIGURE 11 –CUMULATIVE (2019) AM (PM) PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES ............................................. 34 FIGURE 12 – CUMULATIVE (2019) WITH PROJECT AM (PM) PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES ..................... 37 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 – STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS ....................................................................................................................... 9 TABLE 2 – INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) DEFINITIONS ................................................................................ 13 TABLE 3 – EXISTING (2014) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LOS ...................................................................................... 16 TABLE 4 – TRAFFIC TRIP GENERATION TABLE ............................................................................................................. 22 TABLE 5 – EXISTING (2014) WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LOS ............................................................... 25 TABLE 6 – ESTIMATED WEEKDAY TRIP GENERATION OF RELATED PROJECTS ................................................................ 28 TABLE 7 – CUMULATIVE (2019) WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LOS ................................................... 32 TABLE 8 – CUMULATIVE (2019) WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LOS.......................................................... 35 TABLE 9 – ON-STREET PARKING WITH MITIGATION ..................................................................................................... 39 TABLE 10 – FREEWAY MAINLINE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................. 41 TABLE 11 – FREEWAY OFF-RAMP ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................ 42 APPENDICES APPENDIX A – MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) APPENDIX B – TRAFFIC COUNT WORKSHEETS APPENDIX C – CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS (CMA) WORKSHEETS APPENDIX D – SUPPLEMENTAL STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM APPENDIX E - HIGHWAY CAPACITY SOFTWARE (HCS) WORKSHEETS APPENDIX F - ON-STREET PARKING & STRIPING EXHIBIT APPENDIX G - CITY OF LOS ANGELES PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Washington and National Transit Oriented Development Final Draft Traffic Impact Analysis 2 October 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report documents a Traffic Impact and Parking Analysis conducted for the proposed Washington/National Mixed-Use project. The proposed project is located at the northwest corner of Washington Boulevard and National Boulevard in the cities of Culver City and Los Angeles, with a small portion of the project site located within the City
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metro Public Hearing Pamphlet
    Proposed Service Changes Metro will hold a series of six virtual on proposed major service changes to public hearings beginning Wednesday, Metro’s bus service. Approved changes August 19 through Thursday, August 27, will become effective December 2020 2020 to receive community input or later. How to Participate By Phone: Other Ways to Comment: Members of the public can call Comments sent via U.S Mail should be addressed to: 877.422.8614 Metro Service Planning & Development and enter the corresponding extension to listen Attn: NextGen Bus Plan Proposed to the proceedings or to submit comments by phone in their preferred language (from the time Service Changes each hearing starts until it concludes). Audio and 1 Gateway Plaza, 99-7-1 comment lines with live translations in Mandarin, Los Angeles, CA 90012-2932 Spanish, and Russian will be available as listed. Callers to the comment line will be able to listen Comments must be postmarked by midnight, to the proceedings while they wait for their turn Thursday, August 27, 2020. Only comments to submit comments via phone. Audio lines received via the comment links in the agendas are available to listen to the hearings without will be read during each hearing. being called on to provide live public comment Comments via e-mail should be addressed to: via phone. [email protected] Online: Attn: “NextGen Bus Plan Submit your comments online via the Public Proposed Service Changes” Hearing Agendas. Agendas will be posted at metro.net/about/board/agenda Facsimiles should be addressed as above and sent to: at least 72 hours in advance of each hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BID TABULATION Bid No: OP33673069 Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services
    LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BID TABULATION Bid No: OP33673069 Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Services Bids Out: 02/14/13 Total 15 Bids Opened: 03/21/13 Total 6 Lincoln Training Center Diversified Landscape Co. Woods Maintenance Service, Inc. Advertisement Date(s): 02/14/13 Newspaper: LA Daily News FACILITY/LOCATION 36 MONTH BASE A. BUS DIVISIONS, TERMAINALS AND LAYOVER LOTS MONTHLY MONTHLY MONTHLY SAN FERNANDO $535.25 $444.00 $1,506.00 SAN GABRIEL VAL $540.50 $888.00 $1,506.00 DIVISION 1 $1,635.75 $1,110.00 $4,438.00 DIVISION 2 $420.79 $444.00 $1,163.00 DIVISION 3 $357.27 $333.00 $986.00 DIVISION 4 $325.95 $888.00 $889.00 DIVISION 5 $335.35 $1,332.00 $1,035.00 DIVISION 6 $219.36 $444.00 $617.00 DIVISION 7 $239.36 $444.00 $655.00 DIVISION 8 $375.98 $1,332.00 $1,026.00 DIVISION 9 $170.25 $888.00 $479.00 DIVISION 10 $646.50 $2,664.00 $1,751.00 DIVISION 12 $175.80 $666.00 $493.00 DIVISION 15 $1,300.00 $2,220.00 $3,558.00 TERMINAL 17 $197.25 $222.00 $547.00 DIVISION 18 $645.85 $1,554.00 $1,751.00 TERMINAL 19 $1,235.55 $222.00 $3,354.00 TERMINAL 26 $180.00 $222.00 $506.00 TERMINAL 27 $190.00 $222.00 $533.00 LOCATION 30 $2,479.59 $444.00 $6,735.00 LOCATION 31 $170.95 $222.00 $479.00 TERMINAL 37 $105.27 $222.00 $288.00 TERMINAL 38 $257.39 $222.00 $711.00 TERMINAL 39 $174.95 $222.00 $479.00 TERMINAL 40 $629.36 $222.00 $1,711.00 TERMINAL 42 $238.07 $222.00 $657.00 TERMINAL 44 $340.75 $222.00 $932.00 TERMINAL 45 $192.75 $222.00 $531.00 TERMINAL 47 $388.29 $222.00 $1,058.00 LOCATION 53 $335.36 $222.00 $889.00 LAYOVER LOT $270.40 $222.00 $751.00 BUS DIVISIONS MONTHLY SUBTOTAL $15,309.89 (A) $19,425.00 (A) $42,014.00 (A) FACILITY/LOCATION MONTHLY MONTHLY MONTHLY B.
    [Show full text]
  • Westside Cities Report
    SUBREGIONAL MOBILITY MATRIX WESTSIDE CITIES Project No. PS-4010-3041-U-01 Final Report Prepared for: Prepared by: Fehr & Peers 600 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 March 2015 Final Report Westside Cities Final Report Subregional Mobility Matrix Westside Cities PS-4010-3041-U-01 Prepared for: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Prepared by: Fehr & Peers In Association With: Iteris, Inc. Arellano Associates, LLC Civic Projects, Inc. Quality Review Tracking Version # Date Reviewer Signature Description/Comments Internal Review Draft 2/9/15 FP Reviewer: Rachel Neumann RMN Draft 2/11/15 FP Reviewer: Sarah Brandenberg Submit Draft to Metro SUBREGIONAL MOBILITY MATRIX – WESTSIDE CITIES March 2015 Page i Final Report Westside Cities Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Mobility Matrix Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Project Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Process 3 Subregional Overview ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Information About the Contents of This File
    GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONTENTS OF THIS FILE Submissions by the public in compliance with the Commission Rules and Operating Procedures (ROPs), Rule 4.3, are distributed to the Commission and uploaded online. Please note that “compliance” means that the submission complies with deadline, delivery method (hard copy and/or electronic) AND the number of copies. Please review the Commission ROPs to ensure that you meet the submission requirements. The ROPs can be accessed at http://planning.lacity.org, by selecting “Commissions & Hearings” and selecting the specific Commission. All compliant submissions may be accessed as follows: • “Initial Submissions”: Compliant submissions received no later than by end of day Monday of the week prior to the meeting, which are not integrated by reference or exhibit in the Staff Report, will be appended at the end of the Staff Report. The Staff Report is linked to the case number on the specific meeting agenda. • “Secondary Submissions”: Compliant submissions received after the Initial Submission deadline up to 3:00 p.m. Thursday of the week prior to the Commission meeting are contained in this file and bookmarked by the case number. • “Day of Hearing Submissions”: Compliant submissions after the Secondary Submission deadline up to and including the day of the Commission meeting will be uploaded to this file within two business days after the Commission meeting. Material which does not comply with the submission rules is not distributed to the Commission. ENABLE BOOKMARKS ONLINE: **If you are using Explorer, you need will need to enable the Acrobat toolbar to see the bookmarks on the left side of the screen.
    [Show full text]
  • Haynes Expo Final Report 12-5-Rev
    The Exposition Light Rail Line Study A Before-and-After Study of the Impact of New Light Rail Transit Service Prepared for: The Haynes Foundation Prepared by: Marlon G. Boarnet (Principal Investigator), Andy Hong, Jeongwoo Lee, Xize Wang, Weijie Wang University of Southern California With Doug Houston, Steven Spears University of California, Irvine Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... v I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Background and research objectives ................................................................................................................................... 1 2. The policy context ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 3. Travel behavior variables .................................................................................................................................................... 3 4. Structure of this report ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 II. Methods and data collection ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Culver City Palms West Los Angeles Mar Vista Westwood
    PALMS – VA MEDICAL CENTER – UCLA 17 UCLA Macgowan Hall E Terminal Wyton Dickson Westholme Charles E Young Le Conte Weyburn WESTWOOD Veteran Gayley Wilshire Bonsall Hammer Museum n D e l VA West Los Angeles w o D Medical Center Santa Monica Blvd WEST Olympic LOS Westwood Blvd Westside ANGELES Pavilion Pico Sepulveda Station C - E Line Exposition National Sawtelle MAR Palms Station PALMS -E Line Hamilton VISTA High School Sepulveda Palms Blvd B National Windward School Robertson Overland Motor Exposition Venice Blvd A Washington CULVER A Timepoint Punto de Tiempo CITY National Metro Rail Station Culver City Station - E Line Estación de Metro Rail - Metro Bus not to scale - Culver City Bus EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 15, 2021 CULVER CITY STATION E LINE TO UCLA Robertson & Venice City (Culver Station) Overland & Palms Sepulveda & Exposition (Sepulveda Station) Medical VA Center UCLA Macgowan Hall Terminal A B C D E 5:50 5:56 6:04 6:12 6:25 6:20 6:27 6:35 6:43 6:56 6:40 6:47 6:56 7:05 7:19 6:58 7:05 7:15 7:25 7:40 7:14 7:23 7:35 7:46 8:03 7:30 7:40 7:52 8:04 8:22 WEEKDAY 7:45 7:55 8:08 8:20 8:38 8:00 8:10 8:23 8:35 8:53 8:15 8:25 8:38 8:50 9:08 8:30 8:40 8:53 9:05 9:23 8:45 8:55 9:08 9:20 9:38 9:00 9:08 9:20 9:32 9:49 9:15 9:23 9:35 9:47 10:04 9:30 9:38 9:49 10:00 10:17 9:45 9:52 10:02 10:13 10:29 10:00 10:07 10:17 10:28 10:44 DURANTE LA SEMANA 10:15 10:22 10:32 10:43 10:59 10:30 10:37 10:47 10:58 11:14 10:50 10:57 11:07 11:18 11:34 11:10 11:17 11:27 11:38 11:54 11:30 11:37 11:47 11:58 12:14 11:50 11:57 12:07 12:18 12:34 12:10 12:17 12:28 12:40
    [Show full text]
  • Expo Line Scavenger Hunt
    Just like following water through a watershed, Metro’s Expo Line takes us 7th Street/Metro Center from the headwaters to the sea. With The City each passing station, you’ll receive a clue Over the next 46 minutes you will travel 15.2 miles or question. You will be travelling through through 19 station stops, ending up 3 blocks from the Pacific Ocean. Which came first in Downtown the Ballona Creek Watershed and LA – the buildings above or the train below? Why embarking on a journey through time, is this station underground? so be observant and enjoy the ride. Jefferson/USC station PICO STATION LID You are approaching the University of Southern California. Some of the 43,000 students that attend Los Angeles is constantly changing study Urban Design & Low Impact Development Over time the landscape of LA has changed (LID)– a way of designing buildings to conserve and to suit a growing population (12 million in use natural features to protect the environment. Can Greater LA est. 2016). As the train pulls out of you name two ways a building could have a lower this station, look to find murals covering the impact on the surrounding environment? Los Angeles Technical Trade College. Can you find 3 trades featured in the murals that were used to build LA? Fun Fact: Heal the Bay works with the City of LA to protect the watershed by including LID in city plans. Fun Fact: Kanye West once taught a fashion and design class at LATTC. Vermont station Carbon Footprint Calculation Expo Park/USC station Estimate how many people are in your train car.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Commission Agenda Item Report
    City of Culver City, California Planning Commission Agenda Item Report Meeting Date: February 17, 2016 Item Number: PH-1 AGENDA ITEM: Proposed Comprehensive Plan, Height Exception and Tentative Tract Map (P2015-0141-CP, HTEX, and TTM) to allow a mixed use development consisting of a 148 room hotel, approximately 57,700 gross square feet of retail and restaurant uses, 196,300 gross square feet of office use and 200 residential dwelling units located at 8824 National Boulevard. Contact.: Susan Yun, Senior Planner Phone Number: (310) 253-5755; Thomas Gorham, Planning Manager (310) 253-5727 Public Hearing: [X] Action Item: [] Attachments: [X] Public Notification: On January 26, 2016 a notice was posted on the site and was mailed to all the property owners and occupants within a 1,000 foot radius of the Culver City’s Transit Oriented Development area (approximately 1,900 recipients) and emailed to the Master Notification List. The notice was also published in the Culver City News on January 28 and February 4, 2016. Planning Approval: Department Approval: Thomas Gorham, Planning Manager Sol Blumenfeld, Director of Community Development RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) based on the Initial Study finding that the Project, with mitigation measures incorporated, will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment (Attachment No. 2); and 2. Recommend to the City Council Approval of Comprehensive Plan, P2015- 0141-CP, Height Exception, P2015-0141-HTEX, and Tentative Tract Map, P2015-0141-TTM subject to the Conditions of Approval as stated in Resolution No. 2016-P002 (Attachment No.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX L Market Study
    APPENDIX L Market Study Report: Expo and Crenshaw LRT Transit Neighborhood Plans Market Analysis Los Angeles, CA Prepared for: City of Los Angeles, Department of City Planning (DCP) Prepared by: Pro Forma Advisors LLC re+ep February 2013 (with minor revisions April 2014) PFAID: 10-377.02 Pro Forma Advisors LLC Los Angeles Hartford Hong Kong www.ProFormaAdvisors.com Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Organization of the Report .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Project ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Regional Demographic and Socio-Economic Context ............................................................................................. 3 Analysis Geographies ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Population and Households .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4320 S Centinela Ave, Los Angeles, CA
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM 4320 S Centinela Avenue LOS ANGELES, CA EXCLUSIVELY LISTED BY: DANIEL WITHERS SVP & Senior Director - Multifamily Direct +1 818 923 6107 Mobile +1 310 365 5054 [email protected] License No. 01325901 (CA) ™ JEFFREY LOUKS Executive Managing Director Investments Senior Director, National Multi-Housing Group Direct +1 818 212 2780 Mobile +1 310 941 5899 [email protected] License No. 00908473 (CA) ELLIOT SABAG Associate Direct +1 818 212 2672 Mobile +1 818 903 7020 [email protected] License No. CA01989131 (CA) | 2 CONTENTS 05 PROPERTY OVERVIEW 09 AREA OVERVIEW 19 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 3 | S CENTINELA AVE | 4 PROPERTY SECTION OVERVIEW 01 5 | | 6 7 | 4320 S Centinela Avenue LOS ANGELES, CA LOCAL MAP PROPERTY OVERVIEW 4320 S. Centinela Avenue is a 15-unit apartment building located in a prime Mar Vista, CA. Built in 1990, the property consists entirely of two-bedroom, two-bathroom units. The building features a modern gray façade, private balconies, secure gated parking, controlled building access and central air conditioning and heating. Situated just South of Washington Boulevard, the property is in close proximity to many restaurants, cafes, coffee shops, boutiques and night life as well as a weekly farmers market. This location provides tenants easy access to surrounding areas including Culver City, Marina Del Rey and Venice. Additionally, the building is conveniently located near both the 405 and 90 Freeways. This area of West Los Angeles is extremely desirable and is a growing entertainment and technology hub with companies such as Amazon, Apple, Google, Sony and HBO in close proximity.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.12 Transportation and Traffic Regulatory
    Exposition Corridor Transit Neighborhood Plans 4.12 Transportation and Traffic Draft EIR 4.12 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This section provides an overview of transportation and traffic, and evaluates the construction and operational impacts associated with the Proposed Project. Topics addressed in this section include the circulation system; the congestion management plan; emergency access; and public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FEDERAL Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Act of 1990. Titles I, II, III, and V of the ADA have been codified in Title 42 of the United States Code, beginning at Section 12101. Title III prohibits discrimination based on disability in “places of public accommodation” (businesses and non-profit agencies that serve the public) and “commercial facilities” (other businesses). The regulation includes Appendix A through Part 36 (Standards for Accessible Design), establishing minimum standards for ensuring accessibility when designing and constructing a new facility or altering an existing facility. Examples of key guidelines include detectable warnings for pedestrians entering traffic where there is no curb, a clear zone of 48 inches for the pedestrian travelway, and a vibration-free zone for pedestrians. STATE Complete Streets Act. Assembly Bill 1358, the Complete Streets Act (Government Code Sections 65040.2 and 65302), was signed into law by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in September 2008. As of January 1, 2011, the law requires cities and counties, when updating the part of a local general plan that addresses roadways and traffic flows, to ensure that those plans account for the needs of all roadway users. Specifically, the legislation requires cities and counties to ensure that local roads and streets adequately accommodate the needs of bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders, as well as motorists.
    [Show full text]
  • Expocrenshaw Report05.01.14
    Report: Expo and Crenshaw LRT Transit Neighborhood Plans Market Analysis Los Angeles, CA Prepared for: City of Los Angeles, Department of City Planning (DCP) Prepared by: Pro Forma Advisors LLC re+ep February 2013 (with minor revisions April 2014) PFAID: 10-377.02 Pro Forma Advisors LLC Los Angeles Hartford Hong Kong www.ProFormaAdvisors.com Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Organization of the Report .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Project ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Regional Demographic and Socio-Economic Context ............................................................................................. 3 Analysis Geographies ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Population and Households .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Historic Regional Population
    [Show full text]