DOCSLIB.ORG

UKPGE 2010-Donations & Loans-Week5-2010-05-14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UKPGE 2010-Donations & Loans-Week5-2010-05-14 Weekly donations and loans reported by political parties during the 6 May 2010 general election period UK general election 6 May 2010 Week 1 Tuesday 06 April to Monday 12 April 2010 Week 2 Tuesday 13 April to Monday 19 April 2010 Week 3 Tuesday 20 April to Monday 26 April 2010 Week 4 Tuesday 27 April to Monday 03 May 2010 Week 5 Tuesday 04 May to Thursday 06 May 2010 During the general election period (6 April - 6 May 2010), political parties contesting the general election are required to submit weekly reports of donations (including publc funds) and borrowing above £7,500 received by the central party. Parties have 30 days after receiving a donation to carry out permissibility checks and decide whether to accept it. For details of donations and borrowing, please see the tabs at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Donations Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Total Party (£) No (£) No (£) No (£) No (£) No (£) No Christian Party "Proclaiming Christ's Lordship" - - £60,000.00* 1 - - - - - - £60,000.00 1 Conservative Party £1,455,811.86 33 £2,221,341.45 47 £645,250.00 22 £1,375,188.93 34 £1,620,009.50 35 £7,317,601.74 171 Co-operative Party [The] - - - - £33,745.00 1 - - - - £33,745.00 1 Labour Party £783,159.17 7 £1,490,000.00 14 £1,416,862.50 8 £475,000.00 3 £1,118,177.18 6 £5,283,198.85 38 Liberal Democrats £20,000.00 2 £120,000.00 3 £64,000.00 5 £500,000.00 9 £20,000.00 1 £724,000.00 20 Scottish National Party - - £10,000.00 1 - - - - - - £10,000.00 1 Solihull and Meriden Residents Association - - - - - - - - £11,582.00 1 £11,582.00 1 The Buckinghamshire Campaign for Democracy - - £20,000.00 2 - - - - - - £20,000.00 2 Total £2,258,971.03 42 £3,921,341.45 68 £2,159,857.50 36 £2,350,188.93 46 £2,769,768.68 43 £13,460,127.59 235 * Return submitted late. Party incurred a £500 penalty Borrowing (loans, credit facilities, connected transactions) Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Total Party Amount No Amount No Amount No Amount No Amount No (£) No Trust £40,000.00 1 £40,000.00 1 £40,000.00 1 - - - - £120,000.00 3 Total £40,000.00 1 £40,000.00 1 £40,000.00 1 £0.00 0 £0.00 0 £120,000.00 3 Public funds Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Total Party Amount No Amount No Amount No Amount No Amount No (£) No Conservative Party - - - - £397,425.75 1 - - - - £397,425.75 1 Liberal Democrats - - - - £190,284.64 2 - - - - £190,284.64 2 Plaid Cymru - Party of Wales [The] - - - - - - £10,229.02 1 - - £10,229.02 1 Scottish National Party - - - - £12,097.87 1 £38,696.19 1 - - £50,794.06 2 Total £0.00 0 £0.00 0 £599,808.26 4 £48,925.21 2 £0.00 0 £648,733.47 6 Weekly report of donations received by central parties during the 6 May 2010 general election period Week 1 Tuesday 06 April to Monday 12 April 2010 Week 2 Tuesday 13 April to Monday 19 April 2010 Week 3 Tuesday 20 April to Monday 26 April 2010 Week 4 Tuesday 27 April to Monday 03 May 2010 Week 5 Tuesday 04 May to Thursday 06 May 2010 During the general election period (6 April - 6 May 2010), political parties contesting the general election are required to submit weekly reports of donations (and borrowing) above £7,500 received by the central party. Parties have 30 days after receiving a donation to carry out permissibility checks and decide whether to accept it. Party Reported in Donor Donor status Donor address Town Postcode Date of receipt Amount Donation nature Conservative Party Week 5 Alexander Knaster Individual 05/05/2010 £100,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Christopher G French Individual 04/05/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 David J Rowland Individual 05/05/2010 £100,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 David Peacock Individual 05/05/2010 £14,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Delancey Real Estate Asset Management Ltd Company 6th Floor, Lansdowne House, Berkeley Square London W1J 6ER 04/05/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Deloitte LLP Company 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ 06/05/2010 £13,759.50 Secondment of staff and consultancy services Conservative Party Week 5 Edmund G Truell Individual 05/05/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Euro RSCG London Ltd Company Concorde House, 10-12 London Road Maidstone ME16 8QF 06/05/2010 £11,250.00 Advertising costs Conservative Party Week 5 George E Robinson Individual 05/05/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Gloucester Research Ltd Company Whittington House, 5th Floor, 19-30 Alfred Place London WC1E 7EA 04/05/2010 £100,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Greg Hutchings Individual 04/05/2010 £15,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Ian Armitage Individual 04/05/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Investors in Private Capital Ltd Company 25 Harley Street London W1G 9BR 05/05/2010 £15,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 John L Whiter Individual 04/05/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Jonathan P Goodwin Individual 05/05/2010 £25,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Jonathan P Goodwin Individual 05/05/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Jonathan Wood Individual 04/05/2010 £500,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 M & C Saatchi PLC Company 36 Golden Square London W1R 4EE 06/05/2010 £30,000.00 Advertising costs Conservative Party Week 5 Mark Williams Individual 06/05/2010 £25,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Matthew R Ferrey Individual 05/05/2010 £25,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Michael A Alen-Buckley Individual 05/05/2010 £25,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Nicholas Miles Individual 04/05/2010 £25,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Noble Foods Ltd Company Bridgeway House, Ickmeld Way Tring HP23 4JX 05/05/2010 £11,000.00 Helicopter flights Conservative Party Week 5 Philip K Gibbs Individual 05/05/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Rainham Steel Ltd Company Devonshire House, 60 Goswell Road London EC1M 7AD 04/05/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Rhoderick M Swire Individual 05/05/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Sir Martyn Arbib Individual 04/05/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Sir Michael Bishop Individual 05/05/2010 £70,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Sir Richard George Individual 05/05/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Stuart Mitchell Individual 05/05/2010 £25,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Sunley Holdings Plc Company 20 Berkeley Square, Mayfair London W1J 6LH 05/05/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 The Spring Lunch Unincorporated Association PO Box 38549 London SW1V 3YE 05/05/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Thomas Hall Individual 05/05/2010 £25,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 5 Treasury Holdings (UK) Ltd Company 188 Kirtling Street, Battersea London SW8 5BN 06/05/2010 £20,000.00 Venue Hire Conservative Party Week 5 William Ainscough Individual 06/05/2010 £25,000.00 Cash Labour Party [The] Week 5 Fizabai Khaderbhai Individual 04/05/2010 £15,000.00 Cash Labour Party [The] Week 5 GMB Trade Union 22/24 Worple Road London SW19 4DD 05/05/2010 £500,000.00 Cash Labour Party [The] Week 5 Community Trade Union Swinton House, 324 Grays Inn Road London WC1X 8DD 05/05/2010 £23,242.25 Cash Labour Party [The] Week 5 Unite the Union Trade Union 35 King Street London WC2E 8JG 05/05/2010 £456,947.50 Cash Labour Party [The] Week 5 Communication Workers Union CWU Trade Union 150 The Broadway, Wimbledon London SW19 1RX 05/05/2010 £46,683.33 Cash Labour Party [The] Week 5 Anthony Blair Individual 06/05/2010 £76,304.10 Staff, travel, accommodation, website design. Liberal Democrats Week 5 Vitabiotics Ltd Company 1 Apsley Way London NW2 7HF 05/05/2010 £20,000.00 Cash Solihull and Meriden Residents Association Week 5 Nikki Sinclaire MEP Individual 06/05/2010 £11,582.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Alok Oberoi Individual 30/04/2010 £9,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Andrew C Green Individual 27/04/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Barrie O Pettman Individual 30/04/2010 £15,000.00 Cash Consultancy focus groups opinion research Conservative Party Week 4 Bearwood Corporate Services Ltd Company Arcadia House, Maritime Walk, Ocean Village Southampton SO14 3TL 03/05/2010 £21,968.14 printing and related costs Conservative Party Week 4 Christopher Sharples Individual 28/04/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 David W Harding Individual 30/04/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 David Whelan Individual 27/04/2010 £125,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Deloitte LLP Company 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ 03/05/2010 £14,414.08 Secondment of staff and consultancy services Conservative Party Week 4 Dudley Port & Ocker Hill Habitations of the Primrose League Unincorporated Association c/o 24 Old Queen Street London SW1H 9HP 28/04/2010 £23,280.71 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Edmund Lazarus Individual 29/04/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Edwina A Herrmann Individual 27/04/2010 £25,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Euro RSCG London Ltd Company Concorde House, 10-12 London Road Maidstone ME16 8QF 03/05/2010 £18,750.00 Advertising costs Conservative Party Week 4 George R Pinto Individual 27/04/2010 £9,999.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Hani Farsi Individual 27/04/2010 £100,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Harvey Water Softeners Ltd Company Hipley Street Old Woking GU22 9LQ 30/04/2010 £10,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Jeremy B Asher Individual 29/04/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Jeremy Hosking Individual 29/04/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 Jeremy Knight-Adams Individual 30/04/2010 £50,000.00 Cash Conservative Party Week 4 John C Cook
Load more

Recommended publications
  • David Cameron and the Eu: Crossing the Rubicon
    Report No: 149, February 2013 DAVID CAMERON AND THE EU: CROSSING THE RUBICON DAVID CAMERON VE AB: DÖNÜŞÜ OLMAYAN KARAR CENTER FOROrtadoğu MIDDLE Stratejik EASTERN Araştırmalar STRATEGIC MerkeziSTUDIES ORTADOĞUCenter for STRATEJİK Mıddle Eastern ARAŞTIRMALAR Strategıc MERKEZİ Studıes مركز الشرق اﻷوسط للدراسات اﻻستراتيجية ORSAM ORTADOĞU STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR MERKEZİ DAVID CAMERON AND THE EU: CROSSING THE RUBICON DAVID CAMERON VE AB: DÖNÜŞÜ OLMAYAN KARAR ORSAM Report No: 149 February 2013 ISBN: 978-605-4615-46-9 Ankara - TURKEY ORSAM © 2013 Content of this report is copyrighted to ORSAM. Except reasonable and partial quotation and exploitation under the Act No. 5846, Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works, via proper citation, may not be used or re-published without prior permission by ORSAM. Assessments expressed in this report reflect only the opinions of its authors and do not represent the instiutional opinion of ORSAM. Strategıc Informatıon Management and ORSAM Indepentdent Thought Productıon center for mıddle eastern strategıc studıes CENTER FOR MIDDLE EASTERN STRATEGIC STUDIES History In Turkey, the shortage of research on the Middle East grew more conspicuous than ever during the early 90’s. Center for Middle Eastern Strategic Studies (ORSAM) was established in Janu- ary 1, 2009 in order to provide relevant information to the general public and to the foreign policy community. The institute underwent an intensive structuring process, beginning to con- centrate exclusively on Middle affairs. Outlook on the Middle Eastern World It is certain that the Middle East harbors a variety of interconnected problems. However, ne- ither the Middle East nor its people ought to be stigmatized by images with negative connota- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Unison Women's Conference 2015 Preliminary Agenda 12
    2015 National Women's Conference UNISON PRELIMINARY AGENDA UNISON WOMEN’S CONFERENCE 2015 PRELIMINARY AGENDA 12-14 FEBRUARY 2015 SOUTHPORT THEATRE AND CONVENTION CENTRE Page 1 of 58 2015 National Women's Conference UNISON PRELIMINARY AGENDA Page 2 of 58 2015 National Women's Conference UNISON PRELIMINARY AGENDA Recruitment & Organisation 1. Modernising our union Conference notes that, in a time of austerity and job cuts, our recruitment figures for the past year are still encouraging. We commend our activists and staff for their efforts. However, there is still a need to recruit and organise more young members in our union. Given that the majority of public sector workers are women, it is essential that we devise ways to attract young women into our movement, and ensure that our agenda is one in which their aspirations are met, and that our organisation is one in which they can reach their full potential as UNISON members. Conference calls upon the National Women’s Committee to work with other appropriate bodies in UNISON to: 1) Collaborate with student unions, nursing and technical colleges etc to raise awareness of the benefits of union membership and to recruit eligible students into membership at the end of their period of study; 2) Ensure that our branches, regions and formal structures are “user friendly” and easy to access – including by the use of social media; 3) Work with regions to identify appropriate student events where UNISON could have a recruitment and information stand; 4) work with the national young members’ forum to identify the issues which are of concern to potential young women members, and the barriers to them joining a union; 5) request that the NEC consider introducing a reduced flat rate fee for students wishing to join UNISON, and to consider an appropriate rule change.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2009 RESEARCH PAPER 09/53 17 June 2009
    European Parliament Elections 2009 RESEARCH PAPER 09/53 17 June 2009 Elections to the European Parliament were held across the 27 states of the European Union between 4 and 7 June 2009. The UK elections were held concurrently with the county council elections in England on 4 June. The UK now has 72 MEPs, down from 78 at the last election, distributed between 12 regions. The Conservatives won 25 seats, both UKIP and Labour 13 and the Liberal Democrats 11. The Green Party held their two seats, while the BNP won their first two seats in the European parliament. Labour lost five seats compared with the comparative pre-election position. The Conservatives won the popular vote overall, and every region in Great Britain except the North East, where Labour won, and Scotland, where the SNP won. UKIP won more votes than Labour. UK turnout was 34.5%. Across Europe, centre-right parties, whether in power or opposition, tended to perform better than those on the centre-left. The exact political balance of the new Parliament depends on the formation of Groups. The UK was not alone in seeing gains for far-right and nationalistic parties. Turnout across the EU was 43%. It was particularly low in some of the newer Member States. Part 1 of this paper presents the full results of the UK elections, including regional analysis and local-level data. Part 2 presents summary results of the results across the EU, together with country-level summaries based on data from official national sources. Adam Mellows-Facer Richard Cracknell Sean Lightbown Recent Research
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Round-Up 12 Final.Indd
    CAMPUS ROUND-UPWWW.FEWEEK.CO.UK \ \ \ WEDNESDAY, APRIL 23 , 2014 FE Week celebrating FE in partnership with The Education & Training Foundation BBC’S COUNTRYFILE REPORTS FROM WARWICKSHIRE COLLEGE PAGE 5 PERFORMING ARTS STUDENTS HELP FIGHT BULLYING PAGE 8 WORLDSKILLS WINNER RECOGNISED AS MASTER CRAFTSMAN PAGE 9 CUTTING EDGE FILM MAKE-OVERS STUDENTS TRANSFORMED INTO CHARACTERS FROM TIM BURTON FILMS PAGES 4 Leeds City College performing arts student James Thompson, aged 19, as Edward Scissorhands Raising standards in teaching, leadership and workforce development within the education and training sector The new Education and Training Foundation website is here! www.etfoundation.co.uk Follow us on Twitter @_E_T_Foundation CAMPUS ROUND-UP FE Week celebrating FE in partnership with The Education & Training Foundation Young voters hear from Euro MPs and vote to stay in the EU tudents from Walsall College voted Welcome to CAMPUS ROUND-UP edition 12 Soverwhelmingly in favour of the UK staying in the European Union (EU) after debating the issue with three West The guest editor this week he has demonstrated a mature Union membership. We also Midlands Euro MPs. is James Jefferson (pictured), approach to work and obviously reported on a visit by the BBC’s The college held a Europe day, aged 16, who started a two-week wants to learn as much as possible Countryfi le team to Warwickshire where it invited Anthea McIntyre internship with FE Week on from his time here. College’s working farm and (Conservative), Phil Bennion (Liberal Wednesday, April 16. All newspapers have their own special recognition granted to a Democrats) and Nikki Sinclaire He is a fi rst year A-level student writing styles, which are always former WorldSkills winner from (Independent) to debate the advantages at Exeter College studying English a challenge for new reporters a historic representative body for and disadvantages of EU membership language, drama and theatre to learn, but James has already builders and tilers.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottingham Law Journal
    NOTTINGHAM LAW JOURNAL VOL. 21 2012 General Editor Dr Helen O’Nions, LLB (Middlesex), LLM (Leicester), PGDip HE Assistant Editor Ms Andrea Nicholson, LLB (Buckinghamshire), LLM (Durham) Advisory Board The Rt Hon the Lord Saville of Newdigate Prof Stephen Weatherill, University of Oxford Judge Bostjan Zupancic, the European Court of Human Rights The Rt Hon Sir Philip Otton Prof Mark Findlay, University of Sydney Prof Conor Gearty, London School of Economics Mr Jonathan Griffiths, Queen Mary, University of London Prof Michael J. Gunn, University of Staffordshire Prof Martin Hunter, Essex Court Chambers & Nottingham Prof Geraint Howells, Lancaster University Law School Prof Peter Jones, Nottingham Trent University Mr Roger Leng, University of Warwick Prof Robert G. Lee, Cardiff Law School Mr Gary Watt, University of Warwick Miss Helen Milgate, Solicitor Prof Neil Peck, Attorney, Snell & Wilmer, Denver, Mr Christopher Muttukumaru, Director of Legal Col, USA & Nottingham Law School Services, Department of Transport Prof Barry Rider, University of Cambridge Prof John Peysner, University of Lincoln Mr Paul Smith, Partner, Eversheds Prof Mary Seneviratne, Nottingham Law School Mr John Snape, Warwick University Mr Marc S. Stauch, Leibnitz University, Hannover Dr Kim Stevenson, University of Plymouth Prof Adrian Walters, Nottingham Law School Dr Christian Twigg-Flesner, University of Hull Editorial Board Development: Mr Simon Boyes, LLB (Hull), LLM (Hull), PGCert HE Nottingham Matters: Mr Graham Ferris, LLB (Nott), Solicitor Book Reviews: Ms Janice Denoncourt, BA (McGill), LLB (W.Aust.), LLM, Solicitor Case Notes: Miss Kay Wheat, BA (Reading), Solicitor Administrative Assistant Ms Carole Vaughan The Nottingham Law Journal is a refereed journal, normally published in Spring each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Act Before July 5 to Ban Illegal Timber in the UK and Europe
    “It is very important that people in other countries help us to preserve our forests by not using illegal wood. I would like voters in Europe to support this ban on importing illegal wood as it will serve our children – they will inherit the results.” Alberto Granados, Olancho, Honduras Act before July 5 to ban illegal timber in the UK and Europe: www.progressio.org.ukAct before July 5 to ban illegal timber from the UK and Europe Thank you for downloading this PROactive campaign action sheet and for supporting Progressio’s illegal logging action. The vote is on July 5, so there’s not much time to get our voices heard. While there is some hope in the European Parliament for the legislation which has been agreed, we still need to make sure our politicians know that there is public support to ban illegal timber. This is our chance and it is vital that we take it. Included on this sheet is everything you’ll need to tell our politicians we don’t want illegal timber in the UK or Europe: A short text for your church bulletin or to email around A general intercession for Sunday Mass on June 27 and July 4 A suggested text to write a letter to MEPs A list of MEPs by region A poster to print and display in a prominent place is included on the front of this pack Short text: You can use the following text in your church bulletin or personal emails to spread the word: Illegal logging is a disaster for poor communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Candidates and Party Practice in the UK: Evidence from the 2009 European Elections
    Women candidates and party practice in the UK: evidence from the 2009 European Elections Abstract Existing comparative research suggests that women candidates have better opportunities for electoral success when standing in (i) second order elections and (ii) PR elections - the 2009 European Elections provide an example of both criteria. This paper examines the 2009 results to build upon earlier work on the 1999 and 2004 elections by considering (i) regional patterns across parties, with reference to any strategies to improve women‟s representation (ii) incumbency effects (iii) effects of changes in seat shares across parties. --------- EXISTING research on previous European elections demonstrated that the willingness of political parties to place women in the top places on party lists varied, equity in terms of candidate numbers did not result in equity in representation if women languished at the lower end of party lists. Furthermore, virtually all parties failed to take advantage of their own retiring MEPs to promote women1. In the 2005 European Election it was clear that both the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats had taken the most „positive action‟, whilst Conservative equality rhetoric had failed to materialise into notable female candidate selection, and the electoral success of UKIP served as a hindrance to female representation in general. The number of UK MEPs in total declined from 78 (three in Northern Ireland) in 2004 to 72 in 2009 (69 in Great Britain). Women constitute just under 32% of MEPs, compared to 24% as a result of the 2004 elections. The mainstream political parties in the UK foster different attitudes towards equality promotion and equality guarantees.
    [Show full text]
  • P Re S S Re Le A
    UK MEPs: Chairs of committee, EP Vice-Presidents, Chairs of political groups and Quaestors Sharon BOWLES (Lib Dem), Malcolm HARBOUR (Conservative), and Brian SIMPSON (Labour) and have been elected Chairs of the Economic and Monetary Affairs Com- mittee, Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee and the Transport Com- mittee respectively. Diana WALLIS (Lib Dem) and Edward McMILLAN-SCOTT (Conser- vative, whip withdrawn) are EP Vice-Presidents. Nigel FARAGE (UKIP) is the co-leader of the Europe of Freedom and Democracy group. Bill NEWTON-DUNN (Lib Dem) was elected as an EP Quaestor. UK MEPs Office holders: EP Vice-Presidents, Chairs of political groups, Chairs and Vice-Chairs of committees and Quaestors European Parlia- Leaders of EP po- Chairs of EP commit- Vice-Chairs of EP Quaestors ment Vice-Presi- litical groups tees Committees dents Diana Wallis (Liber- Nigel Farage Co- Sharon Bowles (Liberal Struan Stevenson Bill New- al Democrat, ALDE, leader of 32 MEP Democrat, ALDE, South (Conservative, ECR, ton-Dunn Yorkshire and the Europe of Freedom East) Chair of the Eco- Scotland) - First Vice- (Liberal Press release Humber) and Democracy nomic and Monetary Af- Chair of the Fisheries Democrat, group (UKIP, EFD, fairs Committee Committee ALDE, East South East) Midlands) Edward McMil- Malcolm Harbour (Con- Elizabeth Lynne (Liberal lan-Scott (Con- servative, ECR, West Democrat, ALDE, West servative - whip Midlands) Chair of In- Midlands), First Vice- withdrawn, non-at- ternal Market and Con- Chair of the Employment tached, Yorkshire sumer
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Populist Parties in Poland
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Supply and Demand Identifying Populist Parties in Europe and Explaining their Electoral Performance Stijn Theodoor van Kessel University of Sussex Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July, 2011 ii I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be, submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree. Signature: iii Contents List of Tables and Figures v List of Abbreviations viii Acknowledgements x Summary xii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Setting the Scene 1 1.2 State of the Art: The Problems of Populism 4 1.3 Defining and Identifying Populist Parties 12 1.4 Explaining the Electoral Performance of Populist Parties 19 1.5 Research Design and Methodology 31 2 Populist Parties and their Credibility in 31 European Countries 38 2.1 Introduction 38 2.2 The Populist Parties and their Credibility 41 2.3 Conclusion 80 3 Paths to Populist Electoral Success
    [Show full text]
  • The UK Independence Party: Analysing Its Candidates and Supporters1
    The UK Independence Party: analysing its candidates and supporters1 WORKING PAPER March 2011 Philip Lynch ([email protected]) Richard Whitaker ([email protected]) Gemma Loomes ([email protected]) Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH Abstract The UK Independence Party (UKIP) came second in the 2009 European Parliament elections, but small parties, especially those associated with a single issue, face a dilemma about how to progress. If they move too far beyond their core issue, they risk losing their niche position and support base, but if they are to grow their representation, they need to develop a broader platform. Using surveys of UKIP candidates at the 2009 European and 2010 general elections, we assess the political attitudes and views on party strategy of UKIP candidates and compare them with the views of UKIP supporters using opinion poll data. We demonstrate that UKIP’s candidates and supporters are closely aligned, with both groups placing themselves largely on the centre right, being strongly Eurosceptic, favouring tighter immigration policies and distrusting the main parties. There is broad acceptance within UKIP that the party should campaign on issues beyond EU membership, but there are differences over how to approach competition with the Conservative Party 1 The UK Independence Party: analysing its candidates and supporters The UK Independence Party (UKIP) achieved its best election performance in the 2009 European Parliament elections, coming second with 16.5% of the vote and 13 MEPs. As a ‘hard’ Eurosceptic party committed to withdrawal from the European Union (EU),2 it mobilised Eurosceptic sentiment and capitalised on the unpopularity of the main parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Blurred Lines: Exploring Contemporary Attitudes to Gender Portrayal in the Media James Bryson and David Bunker Market Research Society Annual Conference, 2015
    Blurred lines: Exploring contemporary attitudes to gender portrayal in the media James Bryson and David Bunker Market Research Society Annual Conference, 2015 Title: Blurred lines: Exploring contemporary attitudes to gender portrayal in the media Author(s): James Bryson and David Bunker Source: Market Research Society Issue: Annual Conference, 2015 Blurred lines: Exploring contemporary attitudes to gender portrayal in the media James Bryson and David Bunker MTM and BBC Television Gender and society Despite major changes in the circumstances and attitudes of both men and women over the last 50 years the issue of gender is still very much alive in British society today – and not just in the realm of the media. There are still significant gaps in pay (women currently earn, on average, £2.53 less per hour than men do, which equates to 80 pence for every pound a man is paid1) and the British Social Attitudes survey shows that there is still a lot further to go in pursuit of equality in the home (60% of women report doing more than their fair share of the housework compared with just 15% of men2) For women in particular, our qualitative research identified a range of areas in contemporary life where gender-related problems were a cause for concern for. These include: l Life balance – a societal expectation that women should be able to 'have it all' in terms of a career and family, which can put immense pressure on working mums (and, to a lesser extent, dads) l Body image – a pre-occupation with physical appearance and body size (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Equality Act 2010 and Empty Diversity: Neoliberal Legislation and Inequality in the Lives of Trans* and Sexgender Nonconforming People
    The Equality Act 2010 and Empty Diversity: neoliberal legislation and inequality in the lives of trans* and sexgender nonconforming people. C Hunter Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD London Metropolitan University May 2018 Abstract This thesis explores how effectively equality and diversity legislation in the UK offers recognition and protection to trans* and sexgender nonconforming people by engaging with their contemporary experiences. In order to explore these dynamics I give a genealogical and multidisciplinary context to my work. More specifically, I trace the ways in which the development of trans* and sexgender nonconforming discourses impacts on the evolving self-understanding of my research subjects. Finally, I also analyse the implications of my findings for particular forms of legally focused activism. The thesis makes a critical examination of the much commented-on increase in trans* and sexgender nonconforming people’s visibility and social inclusion in the 21st century. In order to undertake such critique I theorize the impact of structural socioeconomic and cultural changes that have taken place in the context of neoliberal governmentality, including the developments in information technologies. I focus on important issues of materiality and political economy to analyse how the neoliberal logic of inclusion of previously discriminated against populations according to their socio-economic fungibility – i.e. their ability to participate in the market – necessarily creates new forms of exclusion and marginalization. This thesis produced a critical examination of the nature of diversity itself in a neoliberal age, focusing in particular on how the valorization of a particular form of empty diversity – i.e.
    [Show full text]