DOCSLIB.ORG

5 Populist Parties in Poland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5 Populist Parties in Poland A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Supply and Demand Identifying Populist Parties in Europe and Explaining their Electoral Performance Stijn Theodoor van Kessel University of Sussex Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July, 2011 ii I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be, submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree. Signature: iii Contents List of Tables and Figures v List of Abbreviations viii Acknowledgements x Summary xii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Setting the Scene 1 1.2 State of the Art: The Problems of Populism 4 1.3 Defining and Identifying Populist Parties 12 1.4 Explaining the Electoral Performance of Populist Parties 19 1.5 Research Design and Methodology 31 2 Populist Parties and their Credibility in 31 European Countries 38 2.1 Introduction 38 2.2 The Populist Parties and their Credibility 41 2.3 Conclusion 80 3 Paths to Populist Electoral Success and Failure: QCA Analysis 83 3.1 Introduction 83 3.2 Operationalisation of Causal Conditions 84 3.3 Crisp Set QCA Analysis 94 3.4 Fuzzy Set QCA Analysis 98 3.5 Conclusion 107 4 Populist Parties in the Netherlands 110 4.1 Introduction 110 4.2 Identifying the Populist Parties in the Netherlands 111 4.3 Explaining the Electoral Performance of the Dutch Populist Parties 117 4.4 Conclusion 133 5 Populist Parties in Poland 136 5.1 Introduction 136 5.2 Identifying the Populist Parties in Poland 137 5.3 Explaining the Electoral Performance of the Polish Populist Parties 146 5.4 Conclusion 163 iv 6 Populist Parties in the United Kingdom 166 6.1 Introduction 166 6.2 Identifying the Populist Parties in the United Kingdom 167 6.3 Explaining the Electoral Performance of the British Populist Parties 178 6.4 Conclusion 197 7 Conclusions and Implications 200 7.1 Introduction 200 7.2 Populist Parties in 31 European Countries 202 7.3 Comparing the Populist Parties and their Electoral Performance in the 205 Netherlands, Poland and the United Kingdom 7.4 Implications and Avenues for Further Research 212 Bibliography 218 Appendix A List of Consulted Country Experts (Chapter 2) 242 Appendix B Country Expert Questionnaire (Chapter 2) 243 Appendix C List of Interviewees (Case Studies) 244 Appendix D Expert Survey (Case Studies) 245 Appendix E QCA Analysis Data 247 v List of Tables and Figures Chapter 1 Figure 1.1 Explanatory model concerning the electoral performance of populist 29 parties. Chapter 2 Table 2.1 Populist parties within the 31 European countries under 39 consideration that managed to gain parliamentary representation at least once after the past four parliamentary elections. Table 2.2 The credibility of populist parties in Austria. 43 Table 2.3 The credibility of populist parties in Belgium. 45 Table 2.4 The credibility of populist parties in Bulgaria. 48 Table 2.5 The credibility of populist parties in the Czech Republic. 50 Table 2.6 The credibility of populist parties in Denmark. 52 Table 2.7 The credibility of populist parties in Finland. 53 Table 2.8 The credibility of populist parties in France. 55 Table 2.9 The credibility of populist parties in Germany. 57 Table 2.10 The credibility of populist parties in Greece. 58 Table 2.11 The credibility of populist parties in Hungary. 60 Table 2.12 The credibility of populist parties in Iceland. 61 Table 2.13 The credibility of populist parties in Ireland. 62 Table 2.14 The credibility of populist parties in Italy. 64 Table 2.15 The credibility of populist parties in Latvia. 66 Table 2.16 The credibility of populist parties in Lithuania. 67 Table 2.17 The credibility of populist parties in Luxembourg. 68 Table 2.18 The credibility of populist parties in the Netherlands. 69 Table 2.19 The credibility of populist parties in Norway. 71 Table 2.20 The credibility of populist parties in Poland. 72 Table 2.21 The credibility of populist parties in Romania. 74 Table 2.22 The credibility of populist parties in Slovakia. 76 Table 2.23 The credibility of populist parties in Sweden. 78 Table 2.24 The credibility of populist parties in Switzerland. 80 Chapter 3 Table 3.1 Raw data for the QCA analyses. 87 Table 3.2 Thresholds for QCA analyses. 88 Figure 3.1 Proportionality of electoral results (vote share compared to seat 90 share) in 31 European countries. Figure 3.2 Aggregate electoral volatility in 31 countries (mean over last four 92 parliamentary elections). vi Table 3.3 Truth table for csQCA analysis. 94 Figure 3.3 Venn diagram representing csQCA outcome. 95 Figure 3.4 Plot of degree of cases‟ membership in electoral performance 99 against their membership in the CREDIB condition. Table 3.4 Fuzzy set truth table for presence of electoral success, consistency 101 threshold set at > 0.9. Table 3.5 Intermediate solution for presence of populist electoral success. 102 Figure 3.5 Plot of degree of cases‟ membership in electoral performance 103 against their membership in the causal configuration AVAIL*CREDIB and CREDIB*PR. Table 3.6 Fuzzy set truth table for absence of electoral success, consistency 105 threshold set at > 0.88. Table 3.7 Intermediate solution for absence of populist electoral success 106 (threshold > 0.88). Table 3.8 Intermediate solution for absence of populist electoral success 106 (threshold > 0.80). Chapter 4 Table 4.1 Dutch parliamentary election results 1998-2010. 115 Figure 4.1 Disproportionality between votes and seats in parliamentary 118 elections in eight European countries. Table 4.2 Electoral choice according to social background 1956-2002 in %. 118 Figure 4.2 Aggregate electoral volatility in the Netherlands. 120 Figure 4.3 Positive versus negative references to multiculturalism in party 122 manifestos. Figure 4.4 Most important issues as perceived by the Dutch electorate. 123 Figure 4.5 Position of electorate on the issues of asylum seekers and ethnic 124 minorities. Figure 4.6 Reasons for party choice in parliamentary election of 2002. 125 Figure 4.7 Reaction to the statement: „MPs do not care about opinions of 126 people like me‟. Figure 4.8 Parties voted for in 2006 by the 2010 Freedom Party electorate. 127 Chapter 5 Table 5.1 Parliamentary election results in Poland since 1997. 139 Figure 5.1 Disproportionality between votes and seats in Polish parliamentary 146 elections. Figure 5.2 Disproportionality between votes and seats in parliamentary 147 elections in eight European countries. Figure 5.3 Party membership as a percentage of the electorate in 20 European 148 countries. Figure 5.4 Aggregate electoral volatility in Poland. 150 Figure 5.5 Anti-corruption references in party manifestos. 155 vii Figure 5.6 Confidence in political parties in 15 European countries. 156 Chapter 6 Table 6.1 Party affiliation in 15 European countries. 179 Figure 6.1 General election results (vote- and seat share) of the three main 180 parties, 1964-2010. Figure 6.2 Disproportionality between votes and seats in parliamentary 181 elections in eight European countries. Figure 6.3 Respondents who perceive race relations/immigration/immigrants 184 to be „the most important issues facing Britain today‟. Figure 6.4 Response to the question: „If there were a referendum now on 188 whether Britain should stay in or get out of the European Union, how would you vote?‟ Figure 6.5 Support for EU membership in the UK 1981-2004. 188 Figure 6.6 Agreement with the statement „EU membership is a good thing‟. 189 viii List of Abbreviations* AWS Solidarity Electoral Action (Poland) AWSP Solidarity Electoral Action of the Right (AWSP) BNP British National Party CBOS Public Opinion Research Centre (Warsaw, Poland) CD Centre Democrats (the Netherlands) CDA Christian Democrats (the Netherlands) CEEC Central and Eastern European country CP Centre Party (the Netherlands) D66 Democrats 66 (the Netherlands) EP European Parliament EU European Union FPTP First Past the Post LN Liveable Netherlands LPF List Pim Fortuyn (the Netherlands) LPR League of Polish Families MEP Member of the European Parliament MP Member of Parliament NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation NF National Front (UK) PC Centre Agreement (Poland) PiS Law and Justice (Poland) PO Civic Platform (Poland) PR Proportional Representation PSL Polish Peasant Party PvdA Labour Party (the Netherlands) PVN Party for the Netherlands PVV Freedom Party (the Netherlands) PZPR Polish United Workers Party QCA Qualitative Comparative Analysis SLD Democratic Left Alliance (Poland) SMP Single Member Plurality SNP Scottish National Party * For the sake of brevity, this list does not include all the populist parties (and usual suspects or borderline cases) discussed in Chapter 2. ix SO Self Defence (Poland) SP Socialist Party (the Netherlands) SSP Scottish Socialist Party TON Proud of the Netherlands UKIP UK Independence Party UP Labour Union (Poland) UW Freedom Union (Poland) VVD Liberal Party (the Netherlands) x Acknowledgements In the process of carrying out my research and writing up this dissertation I could rely on the invaluable support of a substantial amount of people. Without their comments and encouragement, this dissertation would not have taken its present form, if it had been written at all.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of English and American Studies UKIP And
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies English Language and Literature Anders Heger UKIP and British Politics Bachelor‟s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: Stephen Paul Hardy, Ph.D. 2015 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. ..................................................... Author‟s signature Acknowledgement I would like to express my thanks towards the Masaryk University and the Czech Republic for providing me with free education and I would also like to thank my supervisor, Mr. Hardy, for his support and much appreciated counsel. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 The History of UKIP ..................................................................................................................... 8 Allan Sked and the First Years .................................................................................................. 8 Change of Leadership and Becoming the Fourth Largest Party ............................................. 12 Becoming a Political Party ...................................................................................................... 16 The Beginning of a New Era ................................................................................................... 21 Analysing the Party‟s Policies ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • David Cameron and the Eu: Crossing the Rubicon
    Report No: 149, February 2013 DAVID CAMERON AND THE EU: CROSSING THE RUBICON DAVID CAMERON VE AB: DÖNÜŞÜ OLMAYAN KARAR CENTER FOROrtadoğu MIDDLE Stratejik EASTERN Araştırmalar STRATEGIC MerkeziSTUDIES ORTADOĞUCenter for STRATEJİK Mıddle Eastern ARAŞTIRMALAR Strategıc MERKEZİ Studıes مركز الشرق اﻷوسط للدراسات اﻻستراتيجية ORSAM ORTADOĞU STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR MERKEZİ DAVID CAMERON AND THE EU: CROSSING THE RUBICON DAVID CAMERON VE AB: DÖNÜŞÜ OLMAYAN KARAR ORSAM Report No: 149 February 2013 ISBN: 978-605-4615-46-9 Ankara - TURKEY ORSAM © 2013 Content of this report is copyrighted to ORSAM. Except reasonable and partial quotation and exploitation under the Act No. 5846, Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works, via proper citation, may not be used or re-published without prior permission by ORSAM. Assessments expressed in this report reflect only the opinions of its authors and do not represent the instiutional opinion of ORSAM. Strategıc Informatıon Management and ORSAM Indepentdent Thought Productıon center for mıddle eastern strategıc studıes CENTER FOR MIDDLE EASTERN STRATEGIC STUDIES History In Turkey, the shortage of research on the Middle East grew more conspicuous than ever during the early 90’s. Center for Middle Eastern Strategic Studies (ORSAM) was established in Janu- ary 1, 2009 in order to provide relevant information to the general public and to the foreign policy community. The institute underwent an intensive structuring process, beginning to con- centrate exclusively on Middle affairs. Outlook on the Middle Eastern World It is certain that the Middle East harbors a variety of interconnected problems. However, ne- ither the Middle East nor its people ought to be stigmatized by images with negative connota- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties and Welfare Associations
    Department of Sociology Umeå University Political parties and welfare associations by Ingrid Grosse Doctoral theses at the Department of Sociology Umeå University No 50 2007 Department of Sociology Umeå University Thesis 2007 Printed by Print & Media December 2007 Cover design: Gabriella Dekombis © Ingrid Grosse ISSN 1104-2508 ISBN 978-91-7264-478-6 Grosse, Ingrid. Political parties and welfare associations. Doctoral Dissertation in Sociology at the Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, 2007. ISBN 978-91-7264-478-6 ISSN 1104-2508 ABSTRACT Scandinavian countries are usually assumed to be less disposed than other countries to involve associations as welfare producers. They are assumed to be so disinclined due to their strong statutory welfare involvement, which “crowds-out” associational welfare production; their ethnic, cultural and religious homogeneity, which leads to a lack of minority interests in associational welfare production; and to their strong working-class organisations, which are supposed to prefer statutory welfare solutions. These assumptions are questioned here, because they cannot account for salient associational welfare production in the welfare areas of housing and child-care in two Scandinavian countries, Sweden and Norway. In order to approach an explanation for the phenomena of associational welfare production in Sweden and Norway, some refinements of current theories are suggested. First, it is argued that welfare associations usually depend on statutory support in order to produce welfare on a salient level. Second, it is supposed that any form of particularistic interest in welfare production, not only ethnic, cultural or religious minority interests, can lead to associational welfare. With respect to these assumptions, this thesis supposes that political parties are organisations that, on one hand, influence statutory decisions regarding associational welfare production, and, on the other hand, pursue particularistic interests in associational welfare production.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES 1. Opening of Sitting 2. Membership of Political Groups 3
    C 286 E/274 Official Journal of the European Union EN 23.11.2006 Thursday 15 December 2005 (2006/C 286 E/04) MINUTES PROCEEDINGS OF THE SITTING IN THE CHAIR: Josep BORRELL FONTELLES President 1. Opening of sitting The sitting opened at 10.05. 2. Membership of political groups Sylwester Chruszcz, Maciej Marian Giertych and Bernard Piotr Wojciechowski had left the IND/DEM Group with effect from 15.12.2005. They would henceforth sit as non-attached Members. 3. Documents received The following documents had been received from the Council and Commission: — Council of the European Union: Amending letter No 1 to the draft general budget of the European Communities of the financial year 2006 (14862/2005 — C6-0413/2005 — 2005/2001(BUD)) referred to responsible: BUDG — Council of the European Union: Amending Letter No 2 to the draft general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2006 (14863/2005 — C6-0414/2005 — 2005/2001(BUD)) referred to responsible: BUDG — Draft general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2006, as amended and accompanied by proposals for modifications (14864/2005 — C6-0415/2005 — 2005/2001(BUD)) referred to responsible: BUDG — Council of the European Union: Amending letter No 3 to the draft general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2006 (15379/2005 — C6-0427/2005 — 2005/2001(BUD)) referred to responsible: BUDG — Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Audi- tors: annual accounts for the financial year 2004 of the
    [Show full text]
  • Europe on the Borderline © Photographer© Join Us for Progressive Thoughts on the 3Rd
    N°02 /2011 | QUARTERLY MAGAZINE Europe on the borderline © Photographer© Join us for progressive thoughts on the 3rd EUSONET I ended up on a “death list” put The late Stieg Larsson’s column together by a Swedish Nazi group. I later from 2003 proves that we were warned got hold of a copy. It states that I’m an about the growth of rightwing extremism anti-racist (true); it has the address of (page 25). We are proud to have been my parents’ house (now sold), and our given permission to posthumously pub- landline phone number (still used by my lish a text that highlights the closeness mum). But the scary calls, made at night between Larsson’s work as a journalist, at the weekends when the Nazis had had and an underlying political message of one beer too many, stopped long ago. his Millennium trilogy. EDITORIAL “Uuuh, you must mean my son. I’m This magazine aims to become a ref- voting for the liberals.” That was my dad’s erence point for progressive politicians, answer to the accusation of being a red so it should not be a surprise that we bastard – which was a mixture of being asked Norway’s Prime Minister Jens sleepy and very probably feeling a little Stoltenberg to address our readers. His “We’re going to kill you, you red bastard.” scared. If so, the 22 July 2011 showed message reflects profoundly the impres- My dad was the first to get to the phone that my late father was scared of the vio- sive way in which he handled a national when it surprisingly rang in the small lent extreme right for a reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Lord-Pearsons-Letter-Of-Complaint-To
    COMPLAINT: COVERAGE BY “TODAY”, SINCE THE WILSON REPORT, OF THE CASE FOR THE UK TO WITHDRAW FROM THE EU. BACKGROUND The 2005 Wilson Report into the BBC’s coverage of EU affairs was the Corporation’s first published independent analysis of its output. Its committee of inquiry was chaired by Lord Wilson of Dinton, formerly Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service. This complaint is that the BBC has not delivered the improvements it promised in its response to that report, of its coverage of EU affairs. This applies particularly to the debate about the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. The Wilson Report was published in January 2005. It was critical of parts of the relevant output. It said: …we do think there is a serious problem. Although the BBC wishes to be impartial in its news coverage of the EU it is not succeeding. Whatever the intention, nobody thinks the outcome is impartial. There is strong disagreement about the net balance but all parties show remarkable unity in identifying the elements of the problem. Sometimes being attacked from all sides is a sign that an organisation is getting it right. That is not so here. It is a sign that the BBC is getting it wrong, and our main conclusion is that urgent action is required to put this right. The problem can be summarised under a number of headings which we analyse below.1 Institutional mindset. Giving the audience the information it needs to make up its own mind is a proper and important role for the BBC and one which it must carry out.
    [Show full text]
  • Doomed to Failure? UKIP and the Organisational Challenges Facing Right-Wing Populist Anti-Political Establishment Parties
    Abedi, A. and Lundberg, T.C. (2009) Doomed to failure? UKIP and the organisational challenges facing right-wing populist anti-political establishment parties. Parliamentary Affairs, 62 (1). pp. 72-87. ISSN 0031-2290 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/41367 Deposited on: 22 October 2010 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Doomed to Failure? UKIP and the Organisational Challenges Facing Right-Wing Populist Anti-Political Establishment Parties This is a pre-copy editing, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Parliamentary Affairs following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version (‘Doomed to Failure? UKIP and the Organisational Challenges Facing Right- Wing Populist Anti-Political Establishment Parties’, Parliamentary Affairs, 62(1): 72-87, January 2009) is available online at http://pa.oxfordjournals.org/content/62/1/72.abstract. Amir Abedi Thomas Carl Lundberg Department of Political Science School of Social and Political Sciences Western Washington University Adam Smith Building 516 High Street 40 Bute Gardens Bellingham, WA 98225-9082 University of Glasgow U.S.A. Glasgow G12 8RT +1-360-650-4143 Scotland [email protected] 0141-330 5144 [email protected] Abstract: Using the UK Independence Party (UKIP), we examine the effects of sudden electoral success on an Anti-Political Establishment (APE) party. The pressures of aspiring to government necessitate organisational structures resembling those of mainstream parties, while this aspiration challenges APE parties because they differ not just in terms of their policy profiles, but also in their more ‘unorthodox’ organisational make-up, inextricably linked to their electoral appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Rôle Des Associations Eurosceptiques Et Du United
    Le rôle des associations eurosceptiques et du United Kingdom Independence Party dans la campagne référendaire britannique de 2005 autour du traité constitutionnel européen Agnès Alexandre-Collier, Karine Tournier-Sol To cite this version: Agnès Alexandre-Collier, Karine Tournier-Sol. Le rôle des associations eurosceptiques et du United Kingdom Independence Party dans la campagne référendaire britannique de 2005 autour du traité constitutionnel européen. Revue française de civilisation britannique, CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d’études en civilisation britannique, 2009, pp.19-29. hal-00465876 HAL Id: hal-00465876 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00465876 Submitted on 10 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License 1 Article paru dans Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, hors-série 2009, pp. 19-29 Le rôle des associations eurosceptiques et du United Kingdom Independence Party dans la campagne référendaire britannique de 2005 autour du traité constitutionnel européen Agnès ALEXANDRE-COLLIER, Université de Bourgogne et Karine TOURNIER-SOL, Université de Toulon. Si les résultats négatifs des référendums français et néerlandais du 29 mai et du 1er juin 2005 ont désormais exclu la possibilité d'un référendum britannique sur le traité constitutionnel européen, la perspective d'un référendum, à plus ou moins long terme, sur l'avenir de la place du Royaume-Uni dans l'Union européenne, n'en reste pas moins envisageable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservatives and Europe, 1997–2001 the Conservatives and Europe, 1997–2001
    8 Philip Lynch The Conservatives and Europe, 1997–2001 The Conservatives and Europe, 1997–2001 Philip Lynch As Conservatives reflected on the 1997 general election, they could agree that the issue of Britain’s relationship with the European Union (EU) was a significant factor in their defeat. But they disagreed over how and why ‘Europe’ had contributed to the party’s demise. Euro-sceptics blamed John Major’s European policy. For Euro-sceptics, Major had accepted develop- ments in the European Union that ran counter to the Thatcherite defence of the nation state and promotion of the free market by signing the Maastricht Treaty. This opened a schism in the Conservative Party that Major exacer- bated by paying insufficient attention to the growth of Euro-sceptic sentiment. Membership of the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) prolonged recession and undermined the party’s reputation for economic competence. Finally, Euro-sceptics argued that Major’s unwillingness to rule out British entry into the single currency for at least the next Parliament left the party unable to capitalise on the Euro-scepticism that prevailed in the electorate. Pro-Europeans and Major loyalists saw things differently. They believed that Major had acted in the national interest at Maastricht by signing a Treaty that allowed Britain to influence the development of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) without being bound to join it. Pro-Europeans noted that Thatcher had agreed to an equivalent, if not greater, loss of sovereignty by signing the Single European Act. They believed that much of the party could and should have united around Major’s ‘wait and see’ policy on EMU entry.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin
    1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin ... Page 1 of 10 UK Office of the European Parliament Home > 1999 > 1999 Election Candidates Candidates The list of candidates was based on the information supplied by Regional Returning Officers at the close of nominations on 13 May 2004. Whilst every care was taken to ensure that this information is accurate, we cannot accept responsibility for any omissions or inaccuracies or for any consequences that may result. Voters in the UK's twelve EU constituencies will elect 78 MEPs. The distribution of seats is as follows: Eastern: 7 East Midlands: 6 London: 9 North East: 3 North West: 9 South East: 10 South West: 7 West Midlands: 7 Yorkshire and the Humber: 6 Scotland: 7 Wales: 4 Northern Ireland: 3 Eastern LABOUR CONSERVATIVE 1. Eryl McNally, MEP 1. Robert Sturdy, MEP 2. Richard Howitt, MEP 2. Christopher Beazley 3. Clive Needle, MEP 3. Bashir Khanbhai 4. Peter Truscott, MEP 4. Geoffrey Van Orden 5. David Thomas, MEP 5. Robert Gordon 6. Virginia Bucknor 6. Kay Twitchen 7. Beth Kelly 7. Sir Graham Bright 8. Ruth Bagnall 8. Charles Rose LIBERAL DEMOCRAT GREEN 1. Andrew Duff 1. Margaret Elizabeth Wright 2. Rosalind Scott 2. Marc Scheimann 3. Robert Browne 3. Eleanor Jessy Burgess 4. Lorna Spenceley 4. Malcolm Powell 5. Chris White 5. James Abbott 6. Charlotte Cane 6. Jennifer Berry 7. Paul Burall 7. Angela Joan Thomson 8. Rosalind Gill 8. Adrian Holmes UK INDEPENDENCE PRO EURO CONSERVATIVE PARTY 1. Jeffrey Titford 1. Paul Howell 2. Bryan Smalley 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Unison Women's Conference 2015 Preliminary Agenda 12
    2015 National Women's Conference UNISON PRELIMINARY AGENDA UNISON WOMEN’S CONFERENCE 2015 PRELIMINARY AGENDA 12-14 FEBRUARY 2015 SOUTHPORT THEATRE AND CONVENTION CENTRE Page 1 of 58 2015 National Women's Conference UNISON PRELIMINARY AGENDA Page 2 of 58 2015 National Women's Conference UNISON PRELIMINARY AGENDA Recruitment & Organisation 1. Modernising our union Conference notes that, in a time of austerity and job cuts, our recruitment figures for the past year are still encouraging. We commend our activists and staff for their efforts. However, there is still a need to recruit and organise more young members in our union. Given that the majority of public sector workers are women, it is essential that we devise ways to attract young women into our movement, and ensure that our agenda is one in which their aspirations are met, and that our organisation is one in which they can reach their full potential as UNISON members. Conference calls upon the National Women’s Committee to work with other appropriate bodies in UNISON to: 1) Collaborate with student unions, nursing and technical colleges etc to raise awareness of the benefits of union membership and to recruit eligible students into membership at the end of their period of study; 2) Ensure that our branches, regions and formal structures are “user friendly” and easy to access – including by the use of social media; 3) Work with regions to identify appropriate student events where UNISON could have a recruitment and information stand; 4) work with the national young members’ forum to identify the issues which are of concern to potential young women members, and the barriers to them joining a union; 5) request that the NEC consider introducing a reduced flat rate fee for students wishing to join UNISON, and to consider an appropriate rule change.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2009 RESEARCH PAPER 09/53 17 June 2009
    European Parliament Elections 2009 RESEARCH PAPER 09/53 17 June 2009 Elections to the European Parliament were held across the 27 states of the European Union between 4 and 7 June 2009. The UK elections were held concurrently with the county council elections in England on 4 June. The UK now has 72 MEPs, down from 78 at the last election, distributed between 12 regions. The Conservatives won 25 seats, both UKIP and Labour 13 and the Liberal Democrats 11. The Green Party held their two seats, while the BNP won their first two seats in the European parliament. Labour lost five seats compared with the comparative pre-election position. The Conservatives won the popular vote overall, and every region in Great Britain except the North East, where Labour won, and Scotland, where the SNP won. UKIP won more votes than Labour. UK turnout was 34.5%. Across Europe, centre-right parties, whether in power or opposition, tended to perform better than those on the centre-left. The exact political balance of the new Parliament depends on the formation of Groups. The UK was not alone in seeing gains for far-right and nationalistic parties. Turnout across the EU was 43%. It was particularly low in some of the newer Member States. Part 1 of this paper presents the full results of the UK elections, including regional analysis and local-level data. Part 2 presents summary results of the results across the EU, together with country-level summaries based on data from official national sources. Adam Mellows-Facer Richard Cracknell Sean Lightbown Recent Research
    [Show full text]