Habitat Modeling of the Common Pheasant Phasianus Colchicus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Habitat Modeling of the Common Pheasant Phasianus Colchicus Research Collection Journal Article Habitat modeling of the common pheasant Phasianus colchicus (Galliformes: Phasianidae) in a highly modified landscape: application of species distribution models in the study of a poorly documented bird in Iran Author(s): Ashoori, Abbas; Kafash, Anooshe; Varasteh Moradi, Hossien; Yousefi, Masoud; Kamyab, Hamidreza R.; Behdarvand, Neda; Mohammadi, Saeed A. Publication Date: 2018-01 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000302396 Originally published in: European Zoological Journal 85(1), http://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2018.1510994 Rights / License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library The European Zoological Journal ISSN: (Print) 2475-0263 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tizo21 Habitat modeling of the common pheasant Phasianus colchicus (Galliformes: Phasianidae) in a highly modified landscape: application of species distribution models in the study of a poorly documented bird in Iran A. Ashoori, A. Kafash, H. Varasteh Moradi, M. Yousefi, H. Kamyab, N. Behdarvand & S. Mohammadi To cite this article: A. Ashoori, A. Kafash, H. Varasteh Moradi, M. Yousefi, H. Kamyab, N. Behdarvand & S. Mohammadi (2018) Habitat modeling of the common pheasant Phasianus colchicus (Galliformes: Phasianidae) in a highly modified landscape: application of species distribution models in the study of a poorly documented bird in Iran, The European Zoological Journal, 85:1, 373-381, DOI: 10.1080/24750263.2018.1510994 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2018.1510994 © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 05 Oct 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 82 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tizo21 The European Zoological Journal, 2018, 373–381 Vol. 85, No. 1, https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2018.1510994 Habitat modeling of the common pheasant Phasianus colchicus (Galliformes: Phasianidae) in a highly modified landscape: application of species distribution models in the study of a poorly documented bird in Iran A. ASHOORI 1, A. KAFASH 2,3, H. VARASTEH MORADI4, M. YOUSEFI *2,5, H. KAMYAB4, N. BEHDARVAND4, & S. MOHAMMADI 6 1Gilan Provincial Office of the Department of the Environment, Rasht, Iran, 2Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran, 3Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Zurich, Switzerland, 4Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran, 5Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, and 6Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran (Received 10 December 2016; accepted 6 August 2018) Abstract The common pheasant is listed as a nationally protected species in Iran because it faces many threats such as habitat destruction, pollution from pesticides and overhunting. The species’ habitat selection remains unknown in Iran; consequently, conservation planning for the species is hampered by this lack of information. In this study we used predictor variables including topographic, anthropogenic, land cover and climate and 122 occurrence points to model the distribution of common pheasant (subspecies P. c. talischensis), in Gilan province, Iran. The results showed that distance to agriculture and orchards as well as distance to plantation forests were the most important variables in predicting species distribution. Furthermore, we found that the total potential suitable habitat for the species in Gilan province is 315,990 hectares. We observed a shift of the species to higher altitudes in the province. We recommend raising awareness about the presence of the species especially among private landowners, creating a network of protected areas on private land, and changing land-use policies at the provincial level as essential measures for the conservation of the species in Gilan province. Our results can be applied to management and conservation of the species in other modified or rapidly changing landscapes. Keywords: Avian ecology, avian conservation, distribution, Maxent, Iran Introduction (Robinson et al. 1995; Smith & Hellmann 2002), survival (Harris 1984) and movement (Shirley 2006; Natural habitats are rapidly changing worldwide; Tucker et al. 2018) of terrestrial animal species therefore, persistence of biodiversity on this chan- (Suárez-Seoane et al. 2008; Tucker et al. 2018). ging globe is a major challenge (Ricketts et al. 2004; Gilan province is one of the most rapidly changing Lavorel et al. 2007; Priess et al. 2007; Turner et al. provinces in terms of land use (forest to agricultural 2007a,b). Human transformation of land cover and land) in Iran (Nohegar et al. 2015). As a result of land use are the primary causes of biodiversity loss land-use change, urban growth and land degrada- (Haines-Young 2009). As a consequence, continu- tion, the distributions of some terrestrial species ous habitats are being divided into discontinuous have changed in recent years (Ashoori 2009). To patches, which affects population recruitment conserve biodiversity at a provincial scale, it is *Correspondence: M. Yousefi, Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. Tel: +98- 9906131955. Fax: +98-26-32229683. Email: yousefi[email protected] © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 374 A. Ashoori et al. necessary to understand how recent environmental et al. 1975). Phasianus colchicus has four subspecies changes may affect the distribution of species. in Iran – P. c. colchicus, P. c. talischensis, P. c. persicus The common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) is one and P. c. principalis – that can be distinguished from of the most widespread ground-dwelling game birds each other based on morphological characteristics in the Palearctic region, listed as Least Concern in (Kayvanfar & Aliabadian 2013; Kayvanfar et al. the International Union for Conservation of Nature 2013, 2017). Phasianus c. colchicus occurs in Red List (IUCN 2016). Several studies that have Kalibar Mountains in North of East-Azerbaijan pro- been conducted on the demography of and habitat vince, P. c. talischensis in Gilan province, P. c. persi- selection by pheasants in Italy showed that male cus from west of Mazandaran province to Golestan territories are preferentially placed along natural or province (Kayvanfar & Aliabadian 2013; Mahmoudi spontaneous vegetation strips (wood edges, fences, et al. 2016), and P. c. principalis in north-east hedgerows and tree rows) and in areas characterised Khorasan-e-Razavi province from Quchan County by high habitat diversity (Meriggi et al. 1996; Nelli east to Sarakhs County (Kayvanfar & Aliabadian et al. 2012). The presence and abundance of popu- 2013; Kayvanfar et al. 2017). Despite this species lations are linked to the presence of suitable vegeta- being known in terms of morphology (Kayvanfar tion for the settlement of territorial males (Nelli et al. 2013) and phylogeny (Kayvanfar et al. 2017), et al. 2012). Hen density, however, seems to be its habitat selection remains unknown in Iran; as a more linked to suitable sites for nesting, because consequence, conservation planning of the species is they choose to nest out of territories defended by hampered by this lack of information. males (Hill & Robertson 1988; Nelli et al. 2012). Our work is the first effort to build a robust habi- Baxter et al. (1996) showed that patches of smaller tat suitability model and explore the environmental size that are characterised by long and irregular drivers of common pheasant distribution in Iran. In edges are more suitable habitats compared to larger the present study we examined the population from patches with regular edges. However, the study by Gilan province, where the subspecies P. c. talischen- Nelli et al. (2012) showed that pheasants select sis is present. It has been reported that the subspe- small habitat patches but with more regular edges. cies talischensis is very rare throughout its range Sage and Tucker (1998) found that nesting bird (BirdLife International 2016) and has decreased in density was significantly lower in larger patches of many parts of the province during recent years due short-rotation forestry, and highlighted the positive to habitat destruction, land-use changes and over- effect of ecotone on nesting pheasants (Nelli et al. hunting. Because of recent rapid changes of land use 2012). Pheasants utilise marginal belts that supply in Gilan province (Ashoori 2009; Nohegar et al. them with food and protect them from predators 2015) we hypothesised that anthropogenic factors and severe weather, due to the development of her- such as roads and human-modified land use includ- baceous and bushy cover (Nelli
Recommended publications
  • Keeping Pheasants
    KKKEEEEEEPPPIIINNNGGG PPPHHHEEEAAASSSAAANNNTTTSSS AAASSS AAA HHHOOOBBBBBBYYY Text and photos: Jan Willem Schrijvers Photo above: Siamese Fireback pheasant male(Lophura diardi). ORIGIN AND LIFESTYLE OF THE WILD PHEASANT Pheasants are wild gallinaceous birds all originating in Asia. One exception is the Congo peacock from Africa. (The pheasants also include game fowl and peacocks.) Each species has its own characteristics and life habits. There are species that live in tropical rain forests, but there are species that live in the mountains, on cold plains. This is something to take in account when housing our pheasants (with or without a night coop, with or without heating). Most species live in and around the mountains with a woodland vegetation, where they can find lots of berries, greens and seeds. It is of utmost importance to first consider the habits and living conditions of the species you want to keep. Only with proper housing will these beautiful birds show to their fullest, and reproduce. PHEASANTS IN AVIARIES In the past there were some "pheasant farms" which mainly bred the common pheasant (also known as ring-neck pheasant). The birds on these farms were bred for sport hunting. They were released en masse in the autumn in the fields and other areas to be shot for the sport. Some escaped from the hunters and that is why today we can see wild pheasants roam our fields and woods. These pheasants have also succeeded in reproducing themselves, even though they are not native birds. The birds are also kept for their colourful feathers. Each year I see Prince Carnival walk again with the beautiful feathers of the Reeves's Pheasant at his cocked hat.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Portugal: Birds, Alpine Flora & Prehistoric
    Wild Portugal: Birds, Alpine Flora & Prehistoric Art Naturetrek Tour Report 14 – 21 July 2015 Ocellated Lizard Marsh Gentian White-rumped Swift Purple Shot Copper Report compiled by Philip Thompson Images by Tom Mabbett Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Wild Portugal: Birds, Alpine Flora & Prehistoric Art Tour Report Tour Participants: Philip Thompson & Tom Mabbett (leaders) with 15 Naturetrek clients Day 1 Tuesday 14th July With our safe mid-afternoon arrival into Porto airport, the formalities of collecting the minibuses were completed and, eventually, we were on our way for a direct transfer to our first hotel, based in the historic town of Castelo Rodrigo. A refreshment stop on the way was taken; it was something of a shock to the system as we stepped out of the air-conditioned vehicles into 38˚C! Fortunately, this was a very dry heat with non-existent humidity and not too taxing. Having arrived at the hotel, we were soon assigned our various rooms, spread among the three houses that make up the comfortable accommodation. After a pleasant dinner, we retired to rest up and prepare for an early start the next day. Day 2 Wednesday 15th July An early start was taken today in order to make the best use of the cooler conditions at the start of the day, and to enable a return to the hotel in the heat of the late afternoon for a swim and relax. We began with a drive to an area of arable cultivation where a small population of Little Bustards are known to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Birding Eastern Anatolia Th Th 10 June to 20 June 2021 (11 Days)
    Turkey Birding Eastern Anatolia th th 10 June to 20 June 2021 (11 days) Caspian Snowcock by Alihan Vergiliel Turkey, a country the size of Texas, is a spectacular avian and cultural crossroads. This fascinating nation boasts an ancient history, from even before centuries of Greek Roman and Byzantine domination, through the 500-year Ottoman Empire and into the modern era. Needless to say, with such a pedigree the country holds some very impressive archaeological and cultural sites. Our tour of Eastern Turkey starts in the eastern city of Van, formerly known as Tuspa and 3,000 years ago the capital city of the Urartians. Today there are historical structures from the Seljuk and Ottoman periods, and Urartian artifacts can be seen at its archaeological museum. RBL Turkey Itinerary 2 However, it is the birds that are of primary interest to us as here, at the eastern limits of the Western Palearctic, we expect to find some very special and seldom-seen species, including Mountain ‘Caucasian’ Chiffchaff, Green Warbler, Mongolian Finch and Grey-headed Bunting. Around the shores of Lake Van we will seek out Moustached and Paddyfield Warblers in the dense reed beds, while on the lake itself, our targets include Marbled Teal, the threatened White-headed Duck, Dalmatian Pelican, Pygmy Cormorant and Armenian Gull, plus a selection of waders that may include Terek and Broad-billed Sandpiper. As we move further north-east into the steppe and semi desert areas, we will attempt to find Great Bustards and Demoiselle Cranes, with a potential supporting cast of Montagu’s Harrier, Steppe Eagle, the exquisite Citrine Wagtail and Twite, to name but a few.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of Copulation in the Kori Bustard J Ardeotis Kori
    i David C. Lahti & Robert B. Payne 125 Bull. B.O.C. 2003 123(2) van Someren, V. G. L. 1918. A further contribution to the ornithology of Uganda (West Elgon and district). Novitates Zoologicae 25: 263-290. van Someren, V. G. L. 1922. Notes on the birds of East Africa. Novitates Zoologicae 29: 1-246. Sorenson, M. D. & Payne, R. B. 2001. A single ancient origin of brood parasitism in African finches: ,' implications for host-parasite coevolution. Evolution 55: 2550-2567. 1 Stevenson, T. & Fanshawe, J. 2002. Field guide to the birds of East Africa. T. & A. D. Poyser, London. Sushkin, P. P. 1927. On the anatomy and classification of the weaver-birds. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bull. 57: 1-32. Vernon, C. J. 1964. The breeding of the Cuckoo-weaver (Anomalospiza imberbis (Cabanis)) in southern Rhodesia. Ostrich 35: 260-263. Williams, J. G. & Keith, G. S. 1962. A contribution to our knowledge of the Parasitic Weaver, Anomalospiza s imberbis. Bull. Brit. Orn. Cl. 82: 141-142. Address: Museum of Zoology and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of " > Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A. email: [email protected]. 1 © British Ornithologists' Club 2003 I A description of copulation in the Kori Bustard j Ardeotis kori struthiunculus \ by Sara Hallager Received 30 May 2002 i Bustards are an Old World family with 25 species in 6 genera (Johnsgard 1991). ? Medium to large ground-dwelling birds, they inhabit the open plains and semi-desert \ regions of Africa, Australia and Eurasia. The International Union for Conservation | of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Animals lists four f species of bustard as Endangered, one as Vulnerable and an additional six as Near- l Threatened, although some species have scarcely been studied and so their true I conservation status is unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prince of Transylvania's Court Cookbook from the 16Th Century
    The Prince of Transylvania’s court cookbook From the 16th century Trans: Bence Kovacs Editor: Gwyn Chwith ap Llyr (mka Glenn Gorsuch) © Glenn F. Gorsuch Version 1.04 Additional Editing and Error-Checking (which is and shall be an ONGOING process): Kolosvari Arpadne Julia (mka Julia Szent-Györgyi) Kolozsvari Arpad (mka David Szent-Györgyi) Palotzi Marti (mka Martha Palotay) The Science of Cooking Written by The Prince of Transylvania’s court master chef at the end of the 16th century First part of the science of cooking. [text begins here]…keep it, so that the flies wouldn’t lay eggs on it. However, if you can’t kill the hen, ask your master; take both of its wings in your left hand, take its neck with your two fingers and cut it under its wattle, be cautious not to cut its neck. Do the same with the goose and chicken. If you use vinegar, be sure to wash your hands before, lest your hands would taint it. If you want to pluck the feathers, don’t use boiling water. The water for the goose and chicken should be colder than the sterlet’s water. After you’re done with plucking the feathers, singe it, put it into clean water, wash it, cut its nails, disembowel it, but put its stomach and liver into a different pot of water to clean it. When slaughtering a pig, take its nose with one of your hand and put a knife into its brisket. Water temperature should be similar to a chicken’s, because you don’t want to burn it.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Strategy and Action Plan for the Great Bustard (Otis Tarda) in Morocco 2016–2025
    Conservation Strategy and Action Plan for the Great Bustard (Otis tarda) in Morocco 2016–2025 IUCN Bustard Specialist Group About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature- based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with more than 1,200 government and NGO Members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. www.iucn.org About the IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation The IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation was opened in October 2001 with the core support of the Spanish Ministry of Environment, the regional Government of Junta de Andalucía and the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation and Development (AECID). The mission of IUCN-Med is to influence, encourage and assist Mediterranean societies to conserve and sustainably use natural resources in the region, working with IUCN members and cooperating with all those sharing the same objectives of IUCN. www.iucn.org/mediterranean About the IUCN Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of 9,000 experts.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Food and Feeding Habits of Blue Peafowl, Pavo Cristatus Linnaeus, 1758 in District Kurukshetra, Haryana (India)
    International Journal of Research Studies in Biosciences (IJRSB) Volume 2, Issue 6, July 2014, PP 11-16 ISSN 2349-0357 (Print) & ISSN 2349-0365 (Online) www.arcjournals.org A Study of Food and Feeding Habits of Blue Peafowl, Pavo Cristatus Linnaeus, 1758 in District Kurukshetra, Haryana (India) Girish Chopra, Tarsem Kumar Department of Zoology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119 (INDIA) [email protected] Summary: Present study was conducted to determine the food and feeding habits of blue peafowl in three study sites, namely, Saraswati plantation wildlife sanctuary (SPWS), Bir Sonti Reserve Forest (BSRF), and Jhrouli Kalan village (JKAL). Point count method (Blondel et al., 1981) was followed during periodic fortnightly visits to all the three selected study sites. The peafowls were observed to feed on flowers, fruits, leaves of 11, 8 and 8 plant species respectively. These were sighted to feed on Brassica compestris (flowers, leaves), Trifolium alexandarium (flowers, leaves), Triticum aestivum (flowers, leaves, fruits), Oryza sativa (flowers, leaves, fruits), Chenopodium album (flowers, leaves, fruits), Parthenium histerophoresus (flowers, leaves), Pisum sativum (flowers, leaves, fruits), Cicer arientum (flowers, leaves, fruits), Pyrus pyrifolia (flowers, fruits), Ficus benghalensis (flowers, fruits), Ficus rumphii (flowers, fruits). They were also observed feeding on insects in all three study sites and on remains of the snake bodies at the BSRF and JKAL study site. The findings revealed that the Indian peafowl, on one hand, functions as a predator of agricultural pests but, on the other hand, is itself a pest on agricultural crops. Keywords: Blue peafowl, Food, Feeding Habits, Herbs, Shrubs, Trees. 1. INTRODUCTION Birds are warm-blooded, bipedal, oviparous vertebrates characterized by bony beak, pneumatic bones, feathers and wings.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Checklists of the World Country Or Region: Ghana
    Avibase Page 1of 24 Col Location Date Start time Duration Distance Avibase - Bird Checklists of the World 1 Country or region: Ghana 2 Number of species: 773 3 Number of endemics: 0 4 Number of breeding endemics: 0 5 Number of globally threatened species: 26 6 Number of extinct species: 0 7 Number of introduced species: 1 8 Date last reviewed: 2019-11-10 9 10 Recommended citation: Lepage, D. 2021. Checklist of the birds of Ghana. Avibase, the world bird database. Retrieved from .https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/checklist.jsp?lang=EN&region=gh [26/09/2021]. Make your observations count! Submit your data to ebird.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Paul Johnsgard Collection Papers in the Biological Sciences 1983 Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants" (1983). Paul Johnsgard Collection. 17. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Paul Johnsgard Collection by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. HYBRIDIZATION & ZOOGEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN PHEASANTS PAUL A. JOHNSGARD The purpose of this paper is to infonn members of the W.P.A. of an unusual scientific use of the extent and significance of hybridization among pheasants (tribe Phasianini in the proposed classification of Johnsgard~ 1973). This has occasionally occurred naturally, as for example between such locally sympatric species pairs as the kalij (Lophura leucol11elana) and the silver pheasant (L. nycthelnera), but usually occurs "'accidentally" in captive birds, especially in the absence of conspecific mates. Rarely has it been specifically planned for scientific purposes, such as for obtaining genetic, morphological, or biochemical information on hybrid haemoglobins (Brush. 1967), trans­ ferins (Crozier, 1967), or immunoelectrophoretic comparisons of blood sera (Sato, Ishi and HiraI, 1967). The literature has been summarized by Gray (1958), Delacour (1977), and Rutgers and Norris (1970). Some of these alleged hybrids, especially those not involving other Galliformes, were inadequately doculnented, and in a few cases such as a supposed hybrid between domestic fowl (Gallus gal/us) and the lyrebird (Menura novaehollandiae) can be discounted.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use by the Great Indian Bustard Ardeotis Nigriceps (Gruiformes: Otididae) in Breeding and Non-Breeding Seasons
    Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 February 2013 | 5(2): 3654–3660 Habitat use by the Great Indian Bustard Ardeotis nigriceps (Gruiformes: Otididae) in breeding and non-breeding seasons in Kachchh, Gujarat, India ISSN Short Communication Short Online 0974-7907 Sandeep B. Munjpara 1, C.N. Pandey 2 & B. Jethva 3 Print 0974-7893 1 Junior Research Fellow, 3 Scientist, GEER Foundation, Indroda Nature Park, P.O. Sector-7, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382007, OPEN ACCESS India 2 Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Sector-10, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382007, India 3 Presently address: Green Support Services, C-101, Sarthak Apartment, Kh-0, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382007, India 1 [email protected] (corresponding author), 2 [email protected], 3 [email protected] Abstract: The Great Indian Bustard Ardeotis nigriceps, a threatened District (Pandey et al. 2009; Munjpara et al. 2011). and endemic species of the Indian subcontinent, is declining in its natural habitats. The Great Indian Bustard is a bird of open land and In order to develop effective conservation strategies was observed using the grasslands habitat (73%), followed by areas for the long term survival of GIB, it is important to covered with Prosopis (11%). In the grasslands, the communities know its detailed habitat requirements. Determination dominated with Cymbopogon martinii were utilized the highest, while those dominated by Aristida adenemsoidis were least utilized. of various habitats and their utility by the species was As Cymbopogon martinii is non-palatable, we infer that it does not carried out to understand whether the grassland is attract livestock and herdsmen resulting in minimum movement and sufficient enough for detailed management planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Huntable Birds a Review of Status and Conservation Priorities
    FACE - EUROPEAN FEDERATIONEurope’s FOR Huntable HUNTING Birds A Review AND CONSERVATIONof Status and Conservation Priorities Europe’s Huntable Birds A Review of Status and Conservation Priorities December 2020 1 European Federation for Hunting and Conservation (FACE) Established in 1977, FACE represents the interests of Europe’s 7 million hunters, as an international non-profit-making non-governmental organisation. Its members are comprised of the national hunters’ associations from 37 European countries including the EU-27. FACE upholds the principle of sustainable use and in this regard its members have a deep interest in the conservation and improvement of the quality of the European environment. See: www.face.eu Reference Sibille S., Griffin, C. and Scallan, D. (2020) Europe’s Huntable Birds: A Review of Status and Conservation Priorities. European Federation for Hunting and Conservation (FACE). https://www.face.eu/ 2 Europe’s Huntable Birds A Review of Status and Conservation Priorities Executive summary Context Non-Annex species show the highest proportion of ‘secure’ status and the lowest of ‘threatened’ status. Taking all wild birds into account, The EU State of Nature report (2020) provides results of the national the situation has deteriorated from the 2008-2012 to the 2013-2018 reporting under the Birds and Habitats directives (2013 to 2018), and a assessments. wider assessment of Europe’s biodiversity. For FACE, the findings are of key importance as they provide a timely health check on the status of In the State of Nature report (2020), ‘agriculture’ is the most frequently huntable birds listed in Annex II of the Birds Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Illegal Killing and Taking of Birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus
    Review of illegal killing and taking of birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus Overview of main outputs of the project The information collated and analysed during this project has been summarised in a variety of outputs: 1. This full report Presenting all the aspects of the project at regional and national levels http://www.birdlife.org/illegal-killing 2. Scientific paper Presenting results of the regional assessment of scope and scale of illegal killing and taking of birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus1 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bird-conservation-international 3. Legislation country factsheets Presenting a review of national legislation on hunting, trapping and trading of birds in each assessed country http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/country (under ‘resources’ tab) 4. ‘The Killing 2.0’ Layman’s report Short communications publication for publicity purposes with some key headlines of the results of the project and the previous one focussing on the Mediterranean region http://www.birdlife.org/illegal-killing Credits of front cover pictures 1 2 3 4 1 Hen harrier Circus cyaneus © RSPB 2 Illegal trapping of Hen Harrier in the UK © RSPB 3 Common Coot (Fulica atra) © MISIK 4 Illegal trade of waterbirds illegally killed in Azerbaijan © AOS Citation of the report BirdLife International (2017) Review of illegal killing and taking of birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. 1 Paper in revision process for publication in Bird Conservation International in October 2017 when this report is released 1 Executive Summary The illegal killing and taking of wild birds remains a major threat on a global scale.
    [Show full text]