DOCSLIB.ORG

S T E N O G R a M a Şedinţei Delegaţiei Permanente a Partidului

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S T E N O G R a M a Şedinţei Delegaţiei Permanente a Partidului SECRET Exemplar Unic S T E N O G R A M A şedinţei Delegaţiei Permanente a Partidului Social Democrat Sediul PSD Bucureşti, 13 octombrie 2003 Stenograma şedinţei Delegaţiei Permente a Partidului Social Democrat - 13 octombrie 2003 - 1. INFORMARE referitoare la stadiul organizării Referendumului naţional privind revizuirea Constituţiei României ____________________________________________________9 Dl. _____________________________________________________________________________________ 9 Dl. Adrian Năstase ________________________________________________________________________ 9 Dl. Miron Mitrea__________________________________________________________________________ 9 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 10 Dl. Dan Ioan Popescu _____________________________________________________________________ 12 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 12 Dl. Miron Mitrea_________________________________________________________________________ 13 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 13 Dl. Dan Ioan Popescu _____________________________________________________________________ 13 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 13 D-na Rodica Stănoiu ______________________________________________________________________ 14 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 14 Dl. Dan Ioan Popescu _____________________________________________________________________ 14 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 14 Dl. Dan Ioan Popescu _____________________________________________________________________ 15 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 15 Dl. Dan Ioan Popescu _____________________________________________________________________ 15 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 15 Dl. Dan Ioan Popescu _____________________________________________________________________ 15 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 15 Dl. Octav Cozmâncă ______________________________________________________________________ 16 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 16 Dl. Miron Mitrea_________________________________________________________________________ 16 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 16 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 16 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 16 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 17 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 17 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 17 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 17 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 17 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 18 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 18 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 18 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 18 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 18 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 18 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 18 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 18 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 19 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 19 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 19 Dl. Ioan Rus ____________________________________________________________________________ 19 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 19 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 20 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 20 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 21 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 21 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 21 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 21 2 Sediul Partidului Social Democrat - Str.Ion Ionescu de la Brad, nr. 1- Stenograma şedinţei Delegaţiei Permente a Partidului Social Democrat - 13 octombrie 2003 - Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 21 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 22 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 22 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 22 D-na Rodica Stănoiu ______________________________________________________________________ 22 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 22 Dl. Ovidiu Muşetescu _____________________________________________________________________ 22 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 22 Dl. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 22 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 22 Dl. Ioan Rus ____________________________________________________________________________ 23 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 23 Dl. Ioan Rus ____________________________________________________________________________ 23 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 23 Dl. Ioan Rus ____________________________________________________________________________ 23 Dl. Miron Mitrea_________________________________________________________________________ 25 Dl. Ioan Rus ____________________________________________________________________________ 25 Dl. Ioan Rus ____________________________________________________________________________ 26 Dl. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 26 Dl. Ioan Rus ____________________________________________________________________________ 26 Dl. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 26 Dl. Viorel Hrebenciuc _____________________________________________________________________ 26 Dl. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 27 Dl. Viorel Hrebenciuc _____________________________________________________________________ 27 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 27 Dl. Viorel Hrebenciuc _____________________________________________________________________ 27 Dl. Miron Mitrea_________________________________________________________________________ 27 Dl. Viorel Hrebenciuc _____________________________________________________________________ 27 Dl. Miron Mitrea_________________________________________________________________________ 27 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 28 Dl. Miron Mitrea_________________________________________________________________________ 28 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 28 Dl. Ioan Rus ____________________________________________________________________________ 28 Dl. Miron Mitrea_________________________________________________________________________ 28 Dl. Viorel Hrebenciuc _____________________________________________________________________ 28 Dl. Nicolae Văcăroiu______________________________________________________________________ 28 Dl. Miron Mitrea_________________________________________________________________________ 29 Dl. Viorel Hrebenciuc _____________________________________________________________________ 29 Dl. Octav Cozmâncă ______________________________________________________________________ 29 Dl. Viorel Hrebenciuc _____________________________________________________________________ 29 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 29 Dl. Octav Cozmâncă ______________________________________________________________________ 30 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 30 Dl. Octav Cozmâncă ______________________________________________________________________ 31 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________ 31 Dl. Octav Cozmâncă ______________________________________________________________________ 31 Dl. Adrian Năstase _______________________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DIRECTORATE GENERAL for RESEARCH Directorate a Division for International and Constitutional Affairs ------WIP 2002/02/0054-0055 AL/Bo Luxembourg, 13 February 2002*
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR RESEARCH Directorate A Division for International and Constitutional affairs ------------------------------------------------------------------- WIP 2002/02/0054-0055 AL/bo Luxembourg, 13 February 2002* NOTE ON THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC SITUATION IN ROMANIA AND ITS RELATIONS WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE FRAMEWORK OF ENLARGEMENT This note has been prepared for the information of Members of the European Parliament. The opinions expressed in this document are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Parliament. * Updated 11 March 2002 Sources: - European Commission - European Parliament - European Council - Economic Intelligence Unit - Oxford Analytica - ISI Emerging Markets - Reuters Business Briefing -World Markets Country Analysis - BBC Monitoring Service WIP/2002/02/0054-55/rev. FdR 464703 PE 313.139 NOTE ON THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC SITUATION IN ROMANIA AND ITS RELATIONS WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE FRAMEWORK OF ENLARGEMENT CONTENTS SUMMARY................................................................................................................................ 3 I. POLITICAL SITUATION a) Historical background......................................................................................................3 b) Institutions...................................................................... .................................................5 c) Recent developments...................................................... .................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Democratisation and the Invigoration of Civil Society in Hungary, Poland and Romania
    The Relationship between Democratisation and the Invigoration of Civil Society in Hungary, Poland and Romania Mehmet Umut Korkut Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of DPhil Central European University, Department of Political Science May 2003 Supervisor: PhD Committee: András Bozóki, CEU Aurel Braun, University of Toronto Reinald Döbel, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster Zsolt Enyedi, CEU Anneci÷ime ve BabacÕ÷Õma, Beni ben yapan de÷erleri, Beni özel kÕlan sevgiyi, Beni baúarÕOÕ eden deste÷i verdikleri için . 1 Abstract: This is an explanation on how and why the invigoration of civil society is slow in Hungary, Poland and Romania during their democratic consolidation period. To that end, I will examine civil society invigoration by assessing the effect of interest organisations on policy-making at the governmental level, and the internal democracy of civil society organisations. The key claim is that despite previously diverging communist structures in Hungary, Poland and Romania, there is a convergence among these three countries in the aftermath of their transition to democracy as related to the invigoration of civil society. This claim rests on two empirical observations and one theoretical argument: (1) elitism is widely embedded in political and civil spheres; (2) patron-client forms of relationship between the state and the civil society organisations weaken the institutionalisation of policy-making. As a result, there is a gap between the general and specific aspects of institutionalisation of democracy at the levels of both the political system and civil society. The theoretical argument is that the country-specific historical legacies from the communist period have only a secondary impact on the invigoration of civil society in the period of democratic consolidation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report [PDF
    This Annual Report can also be accessed at website: www.meaindia.nic.in Front Cover: Illustration of Central Secretariat buildings from water colour painting by Shri Kashi Nath Das Designed and produced by: CYBERART INFORMATIONS PVT. LTD. Kanu Chambers, 3rd Floor, C-2, Sanwal Nagar, New Delhi 110 049, INDIA Telefax: 26256148/26250700 E mail:[email protected] Contents Introduction 1 Highlights of the Year 2 Synopsis 4 1. Indias Neighbours n Thailand 43 n Morocco 59 n Afghanistan 11 PMs Visit and Agreement for 44 n Palestine 59 n Bangladesh 12 Bilateral FTA n Sudan 60 n Bhutan 14 n Timor Leste 45 n Syria 60 Military Operation in Bhutan 14 n Vietnam 45 n Tunisia 60 by Royal Bhutanese Army China 15 n 3. East Asia 6. Africa (South of Sahara) PMs visit to China, 15 n Japan 46 n Angola 61 22-27 June 2003 n Republic of Korea (ROK) 47 n Botswana 61 n Hongkong 22 n Democratic Peoples Republic 49 n Namibia 61 n Iran 22 of Korea (DPRK) n Zambia 61 President Khatamis Visit and 22 n Mongolia 49 n Mozambique 62 The New Delhi Declaration n Swaziland 62 n Maldives 24 4. Central Asia n South Africa 62 n Myanmar 24 n Azerbaijan 50 n Lesotho 65 n Nepal 27 n Kazakhstan 50 n Zimbabwe 65 Maoist Insurgency in Nepal 27 n Kyrghyzstan 50 n Ethiopia 65 n Pakistan 28 n Tajikistan 51 n Madagascar 65 PMs Initiative at 28 n Turkey 51 n Tanzania 65 Srinagar, 18 April 2003 n Turkmenistan 52 n Zanzibar 66 Indian proposals to Pakistan: 28 n Uzbekistan 52 n Uganda 66 22 October 2003 n Rwanda 66 Ceasefire along the 30 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicknames of Romanian Politicians After 1989
    Nicknames of Romanian Politicians after 1989 Daiana FELECAN, Oliviu FELECAN Key-words: nicknames, political discourse, pragmalinguistics, semantics, sociolinguistics 1. Preliminaries 1.1. Politicians’ nicknames – strategies of argumentum ad hominem1 The present-day world of Romanian politics takes the shape of a theatre of operations from a warring area, a Gaza Strip whose property deed is continually claimed by parties found at either ends of the political spectrum. These parties insult one another publicly, suspect and tell on one another to the National Anticorruption Directorate. They even listen in on their private conversations and discredit each other by means of compromising films. All the aforementioned events, alongside many others, unfold before the alert yet blind eyes and under the allegedly fair consideration of a system of justice that is overwhelmed by the multitude of penal cases pending before courts of law, with ever-postponed trial dates. Nicknames have become means of attack, picked by belligerent interlocutors from the arsenal at hand. They are prolonged-release antidotes used to destroy opponents and their effect is visible in the long run, as nicknames become part of users’ collective memory. When this happens, speakers associate a nicknamed individual with the verbal tag considered emblematic of the nickname bearer. Contemporary Romanian society appears to be increasingly oblivious of the principles that underlie its foundation (politeness, promoting respect in interpersonal relationships and acknowledging the distribution of social roles). As a result, the psychological and linguistic profile of Romanian society was altered along with the institution of democracy after 1989. The consequences of hastily adopting a recently imported configuration, unspecific to a community that is respectful of traditional values yet anxious to follow the pace of globalisation and Americanisation at once and at any cost, are also salient in one of the most prolific language compartments, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Südosteuropa 66 (2018), no. 3, pp. 392-417 CORRUPTION IN SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE AND LATIN AMERICA ALEXANDRA IANCU Questioning Anticorruption in Postcommunist Contexts. Romanian MPs from Commitment to Contestation Abstract. The outbreak of corruption scandals involving elected officials has raised criticism concerning the quality of parliamentary representation in Romania. The public image of the legislature rapidly became that of a ‘reactionary gathering of criminals’, persons who use public office in order to cover abuses of power and office. The core contestation of the legislature aimed above all at the usage by parliament of its constitutional privileges and immunities in order to postpone / impede criminal investigations against members of the legislative. Starting from the analysis of the parliamentary speeches of the members of parliament (MPs) under criminal investigation on corruption charges, this paper focuses on the evolving dynamic of acceptance and contestation with respect to the implementation of anticorruption policies. The paper highlights, based on the analysis of the justifications put forward on the occasion of parliamentary hearings, the gradual configuration of a trans-partisan division within the legislature, promoting countervailing, ‘anti-anticorruption’ discourses, which pit ‘anticor- ruption’ and democratic representation against each other. Alexandra Iancu is a Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Political Science at the University of Bucharest, Romania. Introduction In 2017, hundreds of thousands of Romanians flooded the streets of Bucharest and other major cities in the country to protest at governmental initiatives and justice reforms that appeared conducive to softening the fight against corruption. This degree of mobilization, and especially the contestation of political elites, perceived as corrupt, and more particularly of the party in power initially took the national and international media by surprise.
    [Show full text]
  • DECIZIA Nr.375 Din 6 Iulie 2005
    DECIZIA Nr.375 din 6 iulie 2005 referitoare la sesizările de neconstituţionalitate a Legii privind reforma în domeniile proprietăţii şi justiţiei, precum şi unele măsuri adiacente Publicată în Monitorul Oficial nr.591 din 08.07.2005 Curtea Constituţională a fost sesizată, în temeiul dispoziţiilor art.146 lit.a) din Constituţia României şi ale art.15 din Legea nr.47/1992 pentru organizarea şi funcţionarea Curţii Constituţionale, cu privire la neconstituţionalitatea Legii privind reforma în domeniile proprietăţii şi justiţiei, precum şi unele măsuri adiacente, de către un grup de 101 deputaţi şi 39 senatori, după cum urmează: - deputaţi: Viorel Hrebenciuc, Dan Ioan Popescu, Valeriu Ştefan Zgonea, Bogdan Nicolae Niculescu-Duvăz, Constantin Niţă, Constantin Amarie, Petru Andea, Ecaterina Andronescu, Mihai Cristian Apostolache, Nicolae Bădălău, George Băeşu, Nicolae Bănicioiu, Eugen Bejinariu, Dumitru Bentu, Ioan Bivolaru, Răzvan-Petrică Bobeanu, Ovidiu Brânzan, Ioan Buda, Cătălin Ovidiu Buhăianu Obuf, Romeo Gheorghe Leonard Cazan, Ion Călin, Gheorghe Chiper, Filonaş Chiş, Ioan Cindrea, Titus Corlăţean, Gabriela Creţu, Vasile Emilian Cutean, Iosif Dan, Marin Diaconescu, Corneliu Ioan Dida, Vaier Dorneanu, Doina Micşunica Dreţcanu, Cristian Sorin Dumitrescu, Zamfir Dumitrescu, Mihai Dumitru, Ion Dumitru, Mircea Dusa, Monalisa Gălăteanu, Filip Georgescu, Ion Giurescu, Aurel Gubandru, Iulian Iancu, Florin Iordache, Costică Macaleţi, Iulian Claudiu Manda, Eduard-Stelian Martin, Cătălin Lucian Matei, Alexandru Mazăre, Vladimir Alexandru Mănăstireanu,
    [Show full text]
  • This Letter Is to Confirm That the Equipments for Strong Ground
    National Center for Seismic Risk Reduction NEWSLETTER of NCSRR Issue No. 3, March 2004 Official ceremony of equipment donation to MTCT by Japanese Ambassador in Romania, HE Naotoshi Sugiuchi, on Thursday, November13, 2003 On November 13, 2003, the Japanese International Cooperation Agency, JICA officially donated to Romania a set of earthquake research equipment in value of 1.7 million US$ within the JICA Technical Cooperation Project on Seismic Risk Reduction. The equipments consist in seismic instrumentation and investigation equipments: Kinemetrics K2 and ETNA accelerometers, Geodas (Geophysical Data System) acquisition systems, tri-axial testing apparatus model - DTC-367, and a truck with FRASTE Multidrill - XL drilling equipment. The ceremony took place at the Ministry of Transports, Constructions and Tourism, MTCT of Romania in the presence of HE Naotoshi Sugiuchi, the Japanese Ambassador in Romania and HE Miron Mitrea, the Minister of Transports, Constructions and Tourism, as well as Romanian and Japanese officials and experts and mass media representatives. HE Naotoshi Sugiuchi, the Japanese Ambassador in Romania (left) and HE Miron Mitrea, the Minister of Transports, Constructions and Tourism (right), during the donation ceremony Official handing over of the list with equipment donated © NEWSLETTER of NCSRR – 3RD ISSUE, MARCH 2004 1 National Center for Seismic Risk Reduction The donation was made in the framework of the JICA Project entitled Technical Cooperation Project on the Reduction of Seismic Risk for Buildings and Structures, started on October 1st, 2002 and having the National Center for Seismic Risk Reduction, NCSRR as implementing agency. Official speech of HE Miron Mitrea, the Minister of Transports, Constructions and Tourism In his speech, HE Miron Mitrea, the Minister of Transports, Constructions and Tourism, presented the efforts of MTCT to evaluate the seismic resistance of some 3.600 buildings in 22 counties, amongst which 200 buildings require retrofitting, 122 of them being in Bucharest.
    [Show full text]
  • Instabilite Du Personnel Gouvernemental Et Continuite Decisionnelle En Roumanie Postcommuniste Ionașcu, Alexandra
    www.ssoar.info Instabilite du personnel gouvernemental et continuite decisionnelle en Roumanie postcommuniste Ionașcu, Alexandra Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Ionașcu, A. (2006). Instabilite du personnel gouvernemental et continuite decisionnelle en Roumanie postcommuniste. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 6(2), 319-356. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168- ssoar-56152-8 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0/deed.de Instabilité du personnel gouvernemental 319 Instabilité du personnel gouvernemental et continuité décisionnelle en Roumanie postcommuniste ALEXANDRA IONAŞCU Pour les pays de l’Europe Centrale et de l’Est l’année 1989 marque la fin du communisme et l’écroulement des régimes de «démocratie populaire». Ce change- ment de régime nous pouvons le retrouver avec sa spécificité dans le cas roumain. Comme Daniel Barbu l’observait, la théorie du vide du pouvoir qui a succédé aux événements de 1989 a permis à l’ancienne classe dominante de s’instituer non pas comme une partie dans la négociation, mais comme un arbitre de celle-ci. Pour cette raison on ne pourrait pas parler d’un changement au niveau des élites, mais seulement d’une reconfiguration institutionnelle, car au fond «le macro-change- ment politique a été accompagné par une micro-continuité individuelle»1.
    [Show full text]
  • Icsid Case No. Arb/05/13)
    INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES WASHINGTON, D.C. IN THE PROCEEDING BETWEEN EDF (SERVICES) LIMITED (CLAIMANT) AND ROMANIA (RESPONDENT) (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/05/13) ___________________________________________________________________________ AWARD ___________________________________________________________________________ Members of the Tribunal: Professor Piero Bernardini, President Mr. Arthur W. Rovine, Arbitrator Mr. Yves Derains, Arbitrator Secretary of the Tribunal: Mr. Ucheora Onwuamaegbu Representing the Claimant: Representing the Respondent: Mr. Christoph Liebscher Mr. Darryl S. Lew Mag. Florian Haugeneder Ms. Abby Cohen Smutny Wolf Theiss White & Case LLP Vienna, Austria Washington, D.C., U.S.A. Mr. Florentin Mr. Cornel Popa Zbârcea & Bucharest, Romania Date of dispatch to the Parties: October 8, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................. ii I. PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................... 1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ......................................................................................... 10 1. ASRO’s Operation ............................................................................................................ 11 2. SKY’s Operation ............................................................................................................... 13 III. SUMMARY OF THE PARTIES’ SUBMISSIONS ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th QUARTERLY REPORT
    United States Agency for International Development Contract IQC NO.LAGI-00-98-00006-00 Task Order No. 814 5thQUARTERLY REPORT 5 October 1 -December 31,2001 NEXANT, Inc. A Bechtel -Affiliated Company Gas Restructuring and Regulatory Assistance in Romania 5" Quarterly Report - Oct./Dec. 2001 5thQUARTERLY REPORT October 1 -December 3 1,2001 CONTENTS I. Background 11. Summary of Project Activities During the Reporting Period 111. Future Activities IV. In-Country Staff Activities During the Reporting Period V. Deliverables During the Reporting Period VI. Budget Activity Appendix A: Schedule of Events & Deliverables Appendix B: COPPresentation on Focus Areas & Selection of Project Team Members Appendix C: Project Team Appendix D: Review of Legislative and Market Changes Gas Restructuring and Regulatory Assistance in Romania 5" Quarterly Report - Oct./Dec. 2001 1. Background The objective of USAID's Gas Regulatory and Restructuring Assistance Project in Romania (hereinafter referred to as "The Project") is to provide technical assistance to the Romanian Ministry of Industry and Resources ("MoIR"), formerly Ministry of Industry and Trade ("MoIT"), the Romanian National Gas Regulatory Authority ("ANRGN"), and the gas sector companies that, prior to Romanian Governmental Decision No. 334 of April 2000, were part of the Romanian National Gas Company, ROMGAZ SA'. The Project supports USAID's Strategic Objective 1.5: "A more economically sustainable and environmentally sound energy sector." Assistance under The Project is provided in two areas: 1)
    [Show full text]
  • Privatizare La Petrom?
    JOI, 13 FEBRUARIE 2003 ANUL V / NR. 1.059 12 PAGINI PRE}: 10.000 lei Privatizare la Petrom? Sta]i www.zf.ro ABONEAZ~-TE NOU! INSTANT mai \ntåi s` ne concentr`m Acum v` pute]i abona pe loc la Ziarul Financiar pe o lun` de zile! Ministerul Industriilor vrea s` strång` \ntr-o singur` mån` ce a mai r`mas Trimite]i un SMS \n re]eaua Orange cu textul „ZF“ la 6666 [i \n cel mai scurt timp ve]i fi contactat de din petrochimia romåneasc` departamentul abonamente al ZIARULUI FINANCIAR pentru a vi se cere adresa pe care dori]i s` primi]i Lumea abonamentul. Vi se va da totodat` o parol` [i un Dup` aproape 12 ani de nume de user pe baza c`rora ve]i putea accesa integral site-ul www.zf.ro. laude la adresa Puzzle de Stat arat` mai Valoarea abonamentului - 4 USD + TVA - beneficiilor aduse va fi inclus` \n factura de telefon din luna respectiv`. economiei de afacerile Ministerul Industriilor are o idee: s` fac` un bine Dac` trimite]i SMS-ul private mici [i mijlocii, colos, cu vånz`ri de 700 milioane de dolari pån` la data de 25 a anual, din diviziile petrochimice a trei fiec`rei luni ve]i primi statul romån se uita companii. printr-un abonamentul \ncepånd cu data oftånd \n urm`, de \ntåi a lunii |ns`: - una nu-i apar]ine (Petromidia), display urm`toare. \ncercånd s` reg`seasc` - una este \nglodat` \n datorii (Oltchim), Pentru informa]ii suplimentare sinergiile [i avantajele - alta este \n plin proces de privatizare color pute]i suna la 202.18.42 concentr`rilor (SNP Petrom).
    [Show full text]
  • Stenograma Şedinţei Delegaţiei Permanente a Partidului Social Democrat Bucureşti, Sediul Central PSD, 8 Martie 2004
    Stenograma şedinţei Delegaţiei Permanente a Partidului Social Democrat Bucureşti, sediul central PSD, 8 martie 2004 STENOGRAMA şedinţei Delegaţiei Permanente a Partidului Social Democrat Bucureşti, sediul central PSD, 8 martie 2004 Caseta 1B Dl. Adrian Năstase ... de bază, pentru restructurarea de anul trecut. S-au redistribuit anumite sarcini. Atunci am redus numărul de ministere şi au fost destul de multe elemente pozitive care au apărut. Aspectul cel mai important în momentul de faţă, după părerea mea, şi care ne este reproşat este faptul că noi nu urmărim suficient de atent şi de eficient punerea în aplicare a deciziilor şi a legislaţiei. Foarte mulţi ne spun: venim, ne întâlnim la nivel central cu miniştrii, hotărâm anumite lucruri, dar după aceea, la nivelul doi, la nivelul trei sau nu se doreşte sau nu există mecanismele necesare pentru punerea în aplicare a deciziilor; sunt reglementări care sunt uitate, care nu sunt cunoscute. Şi de aceea, dacă aţi observat şi în Raportul de ţară de anul trecut - nu vorbesc de Raportul Comisiei de Politică Externă de anul acesta - dar în Raportul de ţară de anul trecut, principala critică în legătură cu activitatea guvernamentală în România a fost aceea legată de punerea în aplicare, de implementarea deciziilor şi, de asemenea, a acquisului comunitar. Aş vrea împreună să decidem că aceasta reprezintă o prioritate şi de aceea această unitate specială pe care o creăm la nivelul Guvernului trebuie să aibă acest rol deosebit, de a urmări, 1 Stenograma şedinţei Delegaţiei Permanente a Partidului Social Democrat Bucureşti, sediul central PSD, 8 martie 2004 de a veghea ca ceea ce decidem, ceea ce este prins în programele noastre să poată să fie realizat.
    [Show full text]