DOCSLIB.ORG

Details Combined,..9Perations Landing Craft and Barges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Details Combined,..9Perations Landing Craft and Barges p AL 04 11 - 2 1 This book is invariably to be kept locked up when not in use, and is not to be taken outside the ship or establishment for which it is issued without the express rmission of the Commanding Officer, taw dH4 C.B.04304 (JUNE, 1944) DETAILS OF COMBINED,..9PERATIONS LANDING CRAFT AND BARGES 7 'MG -"/ jity` A BY JUNE, 1944 1_ In order to keep this book up to date, and increase its value, Officers are requested to submit any additions, or corrections to, the information it contains to the Admiralty (D.C.O.M.) ek. 11. lam& This book is the property of H.M. Government. It is intended for the use of the recipients only and for communication to such Officers under them, not below the rank of Commissioned Officer, who may require to be acquainted with its contentsin the course of their duties. The Officers exercising this power will be held responsible that such information is imparted with due caution and reserve. • ,Y Instructors Reae.ing, this Documr•nt, Sign Bolow Name Date /7/ " COMBINED ARMS RESEARCH LIBRARY FORT LEAVENWORTH,KS 11113 iji11181?IAIMI Attention is called to the Penalties attaching to any infraction of the Official Secrets Acts. C.13.04304 NE, 194 DETAILS OF COMBI E TIONS LANDING CRAFT AND BARGES JUNE, 1944 C.B.04304(June, 1943), is hereby superseded and all copies are to be destroyed in accordance with Article 42 of C.B. Form U.2 D (1942). COMBINED OPERATIONS, MATERIAL DEPARTMENT ADMIRALTY, June, 1944. (D.C.O.M.0297/44.) (C52008) • RECORD OF AMENDMENTS Initials. Authority. • Amendment Number. Date of Insertion. 111 INDEX Major Landing Craft Short Title. Page Landing Craft, Flak, Mark III . L.C.F.(3) • • • . .. 1 Landing Craft, Flak, Mark IV .. .. L.C.F.(4) • • • • • . .. 2 Landing Craft, Gun (Large), Mark III .. L.C.G.(L)(3) • • • • • . .. 3 Landing Craft, Gun (Large), Mark IV .. .. L.C.G.(L)(4) • • • • • • .. 3 Landing Craft, Gun (Medium), Mark I .. .. L.C.G.(M)(1) • • . • • • .. 5 Landing Craft, Gun (Tower) .. .. L.C.G.(T) . • • • • . .. 7 Landing Craft (Headquarters) .. .. L.C.H. .. • • • • • 8 Landing Craft, Infantry (Large) .. .. L.C.I.(L) • • • • • . .. 9 Landing Craft, Infantry (Small) .. .. L.C.I. (5) • • • • • • 11 Landing Craft, Support (Large), Mark II . L.C.S.(L)(2) .. .. .. 13 For• L.C.S.(L)(1) see under minor craft. Landing Craft, Tank, Mark II .. .. .. L.C.T.(2) .. .. .. 15 Landing Craft, Tank, Mark III . .. L.C.T. (3) .. •. 17 Landing Craft, Tank, Mark IV .. .. L.C.T. (4) .. .. 19 Landing Craft, Tank, Mark V .. L.C.T.(5) .. .. .. 21 Landing Craft, Tank, Mark VI . .. L.C.T. (6) • • • . .. 93 Landing Craft, Tank (Rocket), Mark II .. .. L.C.T.(R)(2) • • .• • . .. 25 Landing Craft, Tank (Rocket), Mark III . L.C.T.(R)(3) • • • • •. .. 25 Minor Landing Craft Landing Craft, Assault .. .. L.C.A. .. • • • • • . .. 26 Landing Craft, Assault (Hedgerow) .. L.C.A.(HR) • • . • • . .. 28 Landing Craft, Control .•.. .. .. L.C.C. .. .• • • • . .. 29 Landing Craft, Emergency Repair .. L.C.E. .. • • • . .. 30 Landing Craft, Mechanised, Mark I .. L.C.M.(1) . • • • • . .. 31 Landing Craft, Mechanised, Mark III .. .. L.C.M.(3) . • • • • . .. 33 Landing Craft, Navigational . L.C.N. .. • • •. .. .. 35 Landing Craft, Personnel (Survey) .. L.C.P.(SY) .. • • . .. 35 Landing Craft, Personnel (Large) .. .. L.C.P.(L) . • •. .. .. 35 Landing Craft, Personnel(Medium) .. .. L.C.P.(M) . • • • • • .. 37 Landing Craft, Personnel (Nested) .. L.C.P.(N) . • • • • . .. 39 Landing Craft, Personnel(Ramped) .. L.C.P.(R) . • • . .. .. 40 Landing Craft, Personnel (Small) • • .. L.C.P.(S) • • • • •. .. 42 Landing Craft, Support (Large), Mark I .. L.C.S.(L)(1) .. • • . .. 44 Landing Craft, Support (Medium), Mark I . L.C.S.(M)(1) .. .., • • •. .. 46 Landing Craft, Support (Medium), Mark II -L.C.S.(M)(2) .. .• • . .. 46 Landing Craft, Support (Medium), Mark III . L.C.S.(M)(3) .. .• •. .. 46 Landing Craft, Support (Small) .. .. .. L.C.S. (S) . .. • .. .. 48 Landing Craft, Vehicle .. .. .. .. L.C.V. .. - • • • • •. .. 49 Landing Craft, Vehicle, (Personnel) .. .. L.C.V.(P) .• • . .. .. 51 Landing Barges Landing Barge, Emergency Repair .. .. L.B.E. .. .. • • •. .. 55 Landing Barge, Flak .. .• •. .. L.B.F. • • • • • • • .. 59 Landing Barge, Oiler .. .. L.B.O. .. .. .• • • .. 57 Landing Barge, Vehicle, Marks (1) and(2)L.B.V.. • (1) and (2) .• • . .. 53 Landing Barge, Water .. • • . :: L.B.W. .. .• • • • • .. 57_ Illustrations • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • At end Appendix A • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. 60-65 Appendix B • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. 66,67 Relevant Publications • B.R.382 (43). Establishment of Naval stores for L.C.T. and associated types. O.U. Docking information—Landing Craft. (C52008) n2 LANDING CRAFT, FLAK (MARK III) (Nos. 3-18) These craft are converted from L.C.T., Mark III. Machinery, fuel, construction, etc., are similar to L.C.T. (3), except as under. Dimensions Length, extreme: 194 ft. 4in. Beam,extreme: 31 ft. 0 in. Displacement (a) Light (no fuel, water, crew, stores, etc.): 420 tons. (b) Loaded: 515 tons. Registered Tonnage Gross, 308-14. Net, 252-54. Revised Net, 230.97. Draughts At light displacement (a) 2 ft. 2 in. forward,5 ft. 4 in. aft. At loaded displacement (b) 2 ft. 9 in. forward,6 ft. 3 in. aft. Speed, Endurance and Fuel Consumption. (See Appendix A.) Machinery 1 in No., 15 kW,220 v. generator (in addition to L.C.T.(3)). Armour 15 lbs., D.I.H.T., abreast guns. 15 lbs., D.I.H.T., gunshields. Plastic protection round bridges. Armament Nos. 3-6. 8-2-pdrs., Mark VIII, on mountings, Mark VIII* (Single). 4-0erlikons on mountings, IIA or IIIA (Single). Nos. 7-18. 4-2-pdrs., Mark VIII, on mountings, Mark VIII* (Single). 8-0erlikons on mountings, IIA or IIIA (Single). Fresh Water 21 tons. Ammunition Pom-poms: 1,800 rounds/gun. Oerlikons: 2,400 rounds/gun.. Fire Control 1 in No., 1 metre or 80 cm. rangefinder. Signal Radio and Navigational Equipment(in addition to L.C.T. Equipment) 1 in No., Q.H. outfit. 1 in No., L.H., Type 431 or 432. 1 in No., W/T set, Type 686. 1 in No., W/T set, Type CNY 1 (or T.V.5, with hailing equipment, Type 431 or 432). 1 in No., Pattern W.1061,6-in, hand signalling outfit (220 v.). (Otherwise as L.C.T. (3).) Complement Nos.3-6 Naval: 2 officers. Nos. 7-18: 2 officers. 18 men. 18 men. • R.M. guns' crews: 2 officers. 2 officers. 46 men. 54 men. Provision is made for all the above to live aboard. Life-Saving Apparatus 1 in No.,10-ft. dinghy. (In addition to apparatus carried by L.C.T.(3).) Notes D.G. fitted. 20-ton fire and bilge pumps replaced by 70-torf­ (C52008) 133 2 L.C.F.(4) LANDING CRAFT, FLAK (MARK IV) (Nos.19 et seq.) These craft are converted from L.C.T., Mark IV. Machinery, fuel, construction, etc., are similar to L.C.T.(4), except as under. Dimensions Length, extreme: 186 ft. 4 in. Beam,extreme: 38 ft. 9 in. Displacement (a) Light (no fuel, water, crew, stores, etc.) • 410 tons. (b) Loaded:510 tons. Draughts At light displacement (a): 2 ft. 3 in. forward,3 ft. 9 in. at"cut up," 4 ft. 2 in. at propellers. At loaded displacement (b) 2 ft. 11 in. forward, 4 ft. 3 in. at "cut up," 4 ft. 7 in. at propellers. Speed,Endurance and Fuel Consumption. (See Appendix A.) Armour Midship magazine: 4-in. Plastic on deck over. 30 lbs. D.W. plating on sides. Bridge: 20 lbs. N.M.B.P. on forward end. 30 lbs. D.W. plating on aft end. 30 lbs. D.W. plating to gun positions. Armament 4-2-pdrs., Mark VIII, on mountings, Mark VIII* (Single). 8-0erlikons on mountings, IIA or IIIA (Single). Ammunition Oerlikon: 2,400 rounds/gun. Pom-poms: 3,100 rounds/gun. Fresh Water Fire Control 1 in No., 1 metre or 80 cm. rangefinder. Signal, Radio and Navigational Equipment (in addition to L.C.T. Equipment) 1 in No., Q.H. outfit. 1 in No., L.H., Type 431 or 432. 1 in No., W/T set, Type 686. 1 in No., WiT set, Type CNY 1 (f.V.5 with hailing equipment,Type 431 or 432). 1 in No., Pattern W.1061,6-in, hand signalling outfit (220 v.). (Otherwise as L.C.T.(4).) Complement Officers: 2. Men 16. R.M. guns' crew: Officers: 2. Men: 56. Life-Saving Apparatus 1 in No., 10-ft. dinghy. 11 in No.,•Flotanets,9-men capacity. (In addition to apparatus carried by L.C.T.(4).) Notes D.G. fitted. Fire Fighting: 2 in No., Pyrene extinguishers. 5 in No., Foam extinguishers. 20-ton fire and bilge pump replaced by 70-ton. 3 L.C.G.(L)(3) and (4) Mark (3). Nos.1-20; thereafter retain original L.C.T. Nos. Mark (4). Retain original L.C.T. Nos. These craft are converted from L.C.T., Marks (3) and (4). Machinery, fuel, construction, etc., are similar to L.C.T.s from which they are converted, except as under. Dimensions Mark (3). Mark (4). Length, overall: 192 ft. 0 in. 186 ft. 4 in. Beam, overall: 31 ft. 0 in. 38 ft. 9 in. Displacement Mark (3). Mark (4). (a) Light: 420 (no fuel, water, stores, crew, etc.) (b) Loaded: 500 530 tons. Draughts Mark (3). Mark (4). Forward. Aft. Forward. Aft. At light displacement (a): 2 ft. 4in. 3 ft. 8 in. at "cut up," 4 ft. 0 in. at propellers. At loaded displacement (b): 3ft. 6 in. 6ft. 0 in. 2ft. 6in. 4 ft. 0 in. at"cut up," 4 ft. 1 in. at propellers. Speed,Endurance and Fuel Consumption.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROYAL NAVY LOSS LIST COMPLETE DATABASE LASTUPDATED - 29OCTOBER 2017 Royal Navy Loss List Complete Database Page 2 of 208
    ROYAL NAVY LOSS LIST COMPLETE DATABASE LAST UPDATED - 29 OCTOBER 2017 Photo: Swash Channel wreck courtesy of Bournemouth University MAST is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales, number 07455580 and charity number 1140497 | www.thisismast.org | [email protected] Royal Navy Loss List complete database Page 2 of 208 The Royal Navy (RN) Loss List (LL), from 1512-1947, is compiled from the volumes MAST hopes this will be a powerful research tool, amassing for the first time all RN and websites listed below from the earliest known RN wreck. The accuracy is only as losses in one place. It realises that there will be gaps and would gratefully receive good as these sources which have been thoroughly transcribed and cross-checked. any comments. Equally if researchers have details on any RN ships that are not There will be inevitable transcription errors. The LL includes minimal detail on the listed, or further information to add to the list on any already listed, please contact loss (ie. manner of loss except on the rare occasion that a specific position is known; MAST at [email protected]. MAST also asks that if this resource is used in any also noted is manner of loss, if known ie. if burnt, scuttled, foundered etc.). In most publication and public talk, that it is acknowledged. cases it is unclear from the sources whether the ship was lost in the territorial waters of the country in question, in the EEZ or in international waters. In many cases ships Donations are lost in channels between two countries, eg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archeology of the Atomic Bomb
    THE ARCHEOLOGY OF THE ATOMIC BOMB: A SUBMERGED CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF THE SUNKEN FLEET OF OPERATION CROSSROADS AT BIKINI AND KWAJALEIN ATOLL LAGOONS REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS Prepared for: The Kili/Bikini/Ejit Local Government Council By: James P. Delgado Daniel J. Lenihan (Principal Investigator) Larry E. Murphy Illustrations by: Larry V. Nordby Jerry L. Livingston Submerged Cultural Resources Unit National Maritime Initiative United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Papers Number 37 Santa Fe, New Mexico 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS ... LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ......................................... 111 FOREWORD ................................................... vii Secretary of the Interior. Manuel Lujan. Jr . ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................... ix CHAPTER ONE: Introduction ........................................ 1 Daniel J. Lenihan Project Mandate and Background .................................. 1 Methodology ............................................... 4 Activities ................................................. 1 CHAPTER TWO: Operation Crossroads .................................. 11 James P. Delgado The Concept of a Naval Test Evolves ............................... 14 Preparing for the Tests ........................................ 18 The AbleTest .............................................. 23 The Baker Test ............................................. 27 Decontamination Efforts .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Handbook
    o xs, '",«,xi "Z" }z'4 , ni t T r 4ULU1f r F i 3FM YwT y .t .i r w *a1 3 sib '-. iT ,' . tit<r Firm. k i 4 v: t"" ; .. teysh .« ~ .,.^ kr ' r w er ? 3 y ,.t '-".4, r i, ' .}, x s , '. ." 4 l 1 y'F"r .+/1 "i ,. ,rt e : r - .:,mss 1 7- Iv. r , .;3 ax." s... a - 1", «, is ck . fo 'To s . } . a~t o y .q .,' S xy ~ j: M} " D ° a4:iC:y1"tJ J "f,-. Y G ' a" now, c r }: 011, i a 11N V.N 4 s } r ti t1Y M.r h ... +? T i u r f ~ z - .. y'ry" rz.: Hr 3' s'ar '"z "" -son, 7 Ft ; M } r* i ool- ll" H 1 a't ' , a F w:saifsa r r d u ' , .s . .$# }x:.k r 7 yty r h s« k aOt W.0, "a ar 3 'H.a ar r ,G Y n a n 1'# "' t : a rF t ,,t.. lox too; "V MY" 0,11, AN- 4 L ^_: ' ". ,,..' vY : " .. Y 0.F y ~ K- AMENDMEflTS Amend- Amend- mend-By whom Date ofAmend By whom Date of No amended. insertion No amended. insertion. (C55964) B COlVBINED OFEPEATIONS STAFF NOTEBOOK CONTENTS PART I ABBREVIATIONS, DEFINITIONS AND SYMBOLS (a) Abbreviations used in Combined Operations. (b) Abbreviations for landing ships, craft and barges, amphibians and aircraft. (c) Abbreviations (US). (d) Symbols for landing ships and craft and amphibians. (e) Definitions for Combined Operations, with index. (f) Stores distinguishing marks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archeology of the Atomic Bomb
    THE ARCHEOLOGY OF THE ATOMIC BOMB: A SUBMERGED CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF THE SUNKEN FLEET OF OPERATION CROSSROADS AT BIKINI AND KWAJALEIN ATOLL LAGOO NS REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS Prepared for: The Kili/Bikini/Ejit Local Government Council By: James P. Delgado Daniel J. Lenihan (Principal Investigator) Larry E. Murphy Illustrations by: Larry V. Nordby Jerry L. Livingston Submerged Cultural Resources Unit National Maritime Initiative United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Papers Number 37 -Santa Fe, New Mexico 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . iii FOREWORD . vii Secretary of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................... ix CHAPTER ONE: Introduction . 1 Daniel J. Lenihan Project Mandate and Background . 1 Methodology . 4 Activities . 7 CHAPTER TWO: Operation Crossroads . 11 James P. Delgado The Concept of a Naval Test Evolves . 14 Preparing for the Tests . 18 The Able Test . 23 The Baker Test . 27 Decontamination Efforts . 29 The Legacy of Crossroads . 31 The 1947 Scientific Resurvey . 34 CHAPTER THREE: Ship's Histories for the Sunken Vessels 43 James P. Delgado USS Saratoga ............... .... ......................... 43 USS Arkansas . 52 HIJMS Nagato . 55 HIJMS Sakawa . 59 USS Prinz Eugen . 60 USS Anderson . 64 USS Lamson . 66 USS Apogon . 70 USS Pilotfish . 72 USS Gilliam . 73 USS Carlisle . 74 ARDC-13 ................................................. 76 Y0-160 .................................................. 76 LCT-414, 812, 1114, 1175, and 1237 . 77 CHAPTER FOUR: Site Descriptions . 85 James P. Delgado and Larry E. Murphy Introduction . 85 Reconstructing the Nuclear Detonations . 86 Site Descriptions: Vessels Lost During the Able Test . 90 USS Gilliam . 90 e USS Carlisle . 92 Site Descriptions: Vessels Lost During the Baker Test .
    [Show full text]
  • Juno Beach Landing Tables
    Operation Overlord/Neptune Force 'J' - Juno Beach They were Waiting - German Defences The Germans used millions of slave labourers during four years of occupation to construct the 'Atlantic Wall' - a modern fortification system along the coast of France. The fortifications consisted of a series of reinforced concrete gun emplacements supported by well protected infantry strong-points and heavy machine gun nests overlooking the beaches. These were surrounded by trenches with mortars and machine guns. The beaches were strewn with obstacles and mines. Tetrahedral obstacles - three iron bars intersecting at rights angles had been constructed on the beaches. Fields of barbed wire and mines covered the land past the beaches. Also the seafront houses provided excellent observation and firing positions for snipers. There were 32 static Infantry Divisions of widely varying quality defending these fortifications along the French and Dutch coast. This first line of defence was backed up by Panzer Divisions (Armoured and Motorized Divisions) positioned inland from the Atlantic wall. The strategy was, if the Atlantic wall were breached, theses elite formations of crack mobile troops would strike as soon as possible after the landing and throw the Canadians and the Allies back into the sea. Within striking distance of the coast were five first-class divisions: the 21st Panzer Division with an estimated 350 tanks, the 12th SS Division with 150 tanks, the Panzer Lehr Division in the Le Mans area and two more tank divisions in the Seine. The proximity of 12th SS and 21st Panzer Divisions made it difficult for the British and Canadians to capture their objectives of Caen on D-Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Brian O'sullivan AWAY ALL BOATS Pt
    AWAY ALL BOATS: A study of the evolution and development of amphibious warfare in the Pacific War A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History in the University of Canterbury by Brian O’Sullivan University of Canterbury 2008 Abstract Amphibious operations are a topic central to the history of World War Two in the Pacific Theatre. The majority of research on this topic has been centred on the impact of American experiences and successes attributed to the development and evolution of amphibious warfare. The contributions of the United Kingdom and Japan to the development of amphibious warfare have been either overlooked or marginalized. This thesis will investigate the amphibious activities of all three powers both during and before the Pacific War, and seek to explain the importance of each nation’s contribution to amphibious warfare. In addition, the thesis will demonstrate how in its highest forms amphibious operations became a fully fledged system of global force projection. The thesis will explain how each of these powers interpreted the legacy of the failure of the 1915 Gallipoli campaign both in the context of their own wartime experiences, and in their respective strategic worldviews. This interpretation is central to how each power prepared for amphibious operations in the next war. The importance of the geography of the Pacific Ocean to the evolution and development of amphibious warfare will be discussed, as will the advances in technology that allowed the creation of logistical systems to support these operations. 2 Acknowledgements Throughout this project I have been fortunate to receive the support and generous assistance of many people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naval Balance 1970
    The Naval Balance 1970 home THE NAVAL BALANCE 1970 Navies of the world 01/01/1970 1. USA - 6382 tt; 2. USSR - 2195 tt; 3. United Kingdom - 810 tt; 4. France - 319 tt; 5. China - 193 tt; 6. Italy - 185 tt; 7. Taiwan - 183 tt; 8. Spain - 161 tt; 9. Japan - 158 tt; 10. Argentina - 140 tt; 11. Indonesia - 110 tt; 12. Australia - 106 tt; 13. Netherlands - 105 tt ALBANIA ALGERIA ARGENTINA AUSTRALIA AUSTRIA BELGIUM BRAZIL BRUNEI BULGARIA BURMA CAMBODIA CAMEROON CANADA index_1970.htm[18.02.2018 0:23:19] The Naval Balance 1970 CEYLON CHILE CHINA COLOMBIA CONGO COSTA RICA COTE D'IVOIRE CUBA CYPRUS DENMARK DOMINICAN REPUBLIC ECUADOR EGYPT EL SALVADOR ETHIOPIA FINLAND FRANCE GABON GERMANY, EAST GERMANY, WEST GHANA GREECE GUATEMALA index_1970.htm[18.02.2018 0:23:19] The Naval Balance 1970 HAITI HONG KONG HUNGARY ICELAND INDIA INDONESIA IRAN IRAQ IRELAND ISRAEL ITALY JAMAICA JAPAN KENYA KOREA, NORTH KOREA, SOUTH KUWAIT LAOS LEBANON LIBERIA LIBYA MADAGASCAR MALAYSIA index_1970.htm[18.02.2018 0:23:19] The Naval Balance 1970 MAURITANIA MEXICO MOROCCO NETHERLANDS NEW ZEALAND NICARAGUA NIGERIA NORWAY PAKISTAN PANAMA PARAGUAY PERU PHILIPPINES POLAND PORTUGAL QATAR ROMANIA SAUDI ARABIA SENEGAL SINGAPORE SOMALIA SOUTH AFRICA SOVIET UNION index_1970.htm[18.02.2018 0:23:19] The Naval Balance 1970 SPAIN SUDAN SWEDEN SYRIA TAIWAN TANZANIA THAILAND TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO TUNISIA TURKEY UNITED KINGDOM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA URUGUAY VENEZUELA VIETNAM, NORTH VIETNAM, SOUTH YEMEN, NORTH YEMEN, SOUTH YUGOSLAVIA index_1970.htm[18.02.2018 0:23:19] The Naval Balance 1970 Website Hit Counter © Ivan Gogin, 2015 index_1970.htm[18.02.2018 0:23:19] World navies yesterday - Albania 01.01.1970 home World navies yesterday 1970 Albania 01 January 1970 SUBMARINES 510 1956 pr.
    [Show full text]
  • ROYAL NAVY LOSS LIST COMPLETE DATABASE LASTUPDATED - 31MAY 2020 Royal Navy Loss List Complete Database Page 2 of 239
    ROYAL NAVY LOSS LIST COMPLETE DATABASE LAST UPDATED - 31 MAY 2020 Photo: Swash Channel wreck courtesy of Bournemouth University MAST is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales, number 07455580 and charity number 1140497 | www.thisismast.org | [email protected] Royal Navy Loss List complete database Page 2 of 239 The Royal Navy Loss List (The List) covers all vessels recorded as sunk or destroyed Exclusive Economic Zone, Territorial Seas or International Waters in service from the burning of the Regent at the Battle of St Matthieu in 1512 to the sinking of HMS Scylla as an artificial reef in 2004. In most cases it is unclear from the sources whether the ship was lost in the territorial waters of the country in question, in the EEZ or in international waters. Where the The List presents basic details in the format: source specifically states ‘on’ a coast or specific location, it has been assumed that the wreck is in that country’s territorial waters. If, however, ‘off’ is used, or where no - Ship Name/former name(s), specific location is named, then the wreck is assumed to be in that country’s EEZ. In many cases ships are lost in channels between two countries, eg. the River Plate - Ship Type/guns (where applicable), with Argentina and Uruguay on opposite sides, or for example in the ambiguity of the - Tonnage/Displacement, Dover Straits or the English Channel. - Geographical Position (Included only when a Lat/Long position is recorded in the Therefore this work has taken the ‘best guess’ approach where the location of the sources) wreck is relatively clear.
    [Show full text]
  • \· L~I~1~I:;I~~~;;~M~Lm with Hon
    United* StateB* Naval Amphibious Ti"aining Base VOL. 4-NO. 21 FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA * * 25 MAY, 1945 Johnny Mortis Brings Admiral Ingram Praises Flotilla 77 Graduation Dance Band Here For .. l l . I I Exercises on Saturday two Days of Bookings Vita At antic F eet Ro e At 1000 Saturday morning grad­ that only three weeks before the The Battle of the Atlantic uation exercises, featuring a re­ Johnny Morris, known to his was "one of the most decisive" Germans surrendered a U-boat view and dress inspection, will be friends · and fans as "Paradiddle of the war, and particulars of wolf-pack, with orders to "~lanket held on the drill field west of Gul­ Joe" and to all in the music field the "fight to the finish" have the .East C~ast from Mame to . Flonda was mtercepted and badly branson Hall for the officers and as the World's Fastest Drummer, men of Flotilla 77, senior flotilla brings his newly-formed orchestra JUSt bee~ given to t~e Amen- mauled" by a powerful force of can pubhc by Admiral Jonas carriers and DEs. in the Attack Boat Training pro­ to USNATB for a two-day engage­ gram. ment next Monday and Tuesday. H. Ingram, USN, Commander­ In all ,the Atlantic Fleet sank On Monday, Morris and his mu­ in-Chief, Atlantic Fleet. 126 U-boats officially, "most of Heading a group of Base offi­ cials will be Capt. C. Gulbranson, sicians will play at a show for all At a press them far from shore, and probably hands at Gulbranson Hall at 1830; sank many more," Admiral In­ USN, Commanding Officer, who conference a t will award cash prizes to the three and will follow with a "Music the Navy De­ gram said.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Cruise of the Battleship Nagato Part Two: at Sea and Underway
    The Last Cruise of the Battleship Nagato Part Two: At Sea and Underway Bikini Bound We sailed from Yokosuka amid rainsqualls, slipping down the Sagami-wan by time and compass with the cruiser Sakawa on our port quarter. “Well begun, half done,” I said to Captain Whipple. He grimaced and said he sure as hell hoped so. The evening meal was good and movies were shown. Everyone was in high spirits. Nothing happened during the night and by morning we were clear of the land. It was a cloudy day with a gale on our port beam, but already the wind and water were warmer. We settled down into the pleasant routine of life at sea. Water was getting in through cracks and leaks everywhere, but we managed to keep ahead of it. The crew was tired but confident. On the third day out, the wind was still abeam with rough seas, but the water was definitely bluer. It was then that we got the first hint that adventure might be in store for us. Sakawa signaled she was making turns for fourteen knots and wondered how long she would have to keep it up. This was puzzling as we were only making ten knots, yet the two ships stayed right together. The water did seem to be slipping by pretty fast, at that. I hoped she was right. But presently the sun appeared; we shot it and it worked out. Ten knots was right. 2 Another message from Sakawa: “Fuel consumption was fantastic, there were not enough men to man the fire rooms.” In short: could she slow down to eight of her kind of knots? Captain Whipple directed the signal back: “Negative.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Green Turtle Fibropapillomatosis on The
    EFFECTS OF GREEN TURTLE FIBROPAPILLOMATOSIS ON THE REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND EGG COMPOSITION OF GREEN TURTLES (CHELONIA lvfYDAS) NESTING AT FRENCH FRIGATE SHOALS, HAWAIIAN ISLANDS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ANlMAL SCIENCE (ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY) DECEMBER, 2002 By Vanessa Elisabeth Pepi Thesis Committee: Shannon Atkinson, Chairperson James R. Carpenter Lee Ann Woodward Thierry Work f .~ We certify that we have read this thesis and that, in our opinio~ it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree ofMaster of Science in Animal Science (Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology). THESIS COMMITTEE ~P1L;;It&-o~ Chairperson P U-L:J~-~t! f I 11 I r \ l t .. ACKNO\VLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank the following for the invaluable assistance received during this project: George Balazs, National Marine Fisheries Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service personnel & associated Tern Island volunteers during the summer of 1999; The Animal Science graduate students & stress relieflunches (Stephanie Bennett, Eric Beyer, Ann-Marie Dehn, Tom Leedom, Carolyn Oki, Barbara Tang, Chandra Wilkemeyer); Tim Clark, Mindy Dornbusch, Dominique Horvath, John Mulhouse, Julie Rocho, Steve Spielman, Wayne Toma, Dr. Halina Zaleski, and the Grau Lab, HIJv1B. The author wishes to thank the following for project funding and support; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Enviromnental Contaminant Investigation Project Identification No. IN48, Pacific Marine Life Foundation, Animal Nutrition Lab, Department of Human Nutrition Food and Animal Science, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources and Peter and Regula Pepi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Admiralty Trilogy 2012 Standard Damage Point Summary
    The Admiralty Trilogy 2012 Standard Damage Point Summary by Larry Bond and Andy Doty The Admiralty Trilogy 2012 Standard Damage Point Summary by Larry Bond and Andy Doty discovered a way to more correctly describe Shattered Armada, published this year, the damage a ship can suffer. It increases will be the first supplement published using Many of us are familiar with the story the damage points a ships has, with small the 2012 Standard for damage points, of USS Laffey (DD-724), a Sumner-class ships getting more of an increase than larger because all the naval vessels needed for the destroyer that withstood multiple kamikaze vessels. scenarios are included in Annex A of that attacks during the battle of Okinawa and The result is that WW II destroyers supplement. Player who compare the British kept on fighting. By rights, and in our game won’t simply evaporate from a single turn or German ships in Shattered Armada with Command at Sea, she would have been sunk. of heavy cruiser fire (it will still make a the listings in Home Fleet or Gruppe Nord A more recent example is the SINKEX respectable divot). Small craft (Size classes E, will immediately see the difference. of the decommissioned USS Buchanan F, and G) now have more of a chance of not For the ships that have already been (DDG-14), which we covered in the article dying instantly. published, we have created this damage “Proving the Rule” in issue #20 of The Case studies (including USS Buchanan) point summary. It lists all the ships ever Naval SITREP (April 2001).
    [Show full text]