Chapter 3 ORIGINS of the CHRISTIAN DENOMINATION in NEW ENGLAND Elizabeth C
Chapter 3 ORIGINS OF THE CHRISTIAN DENOMINATION IN NEW ENGLAND Elizabeth C. Nordbeck Elizabeth C. Nordbeck is Associate Professor of Church History at Lancaster Theological Seminary, Lancaster, Pennsylvania. THE PIONEERS OF New England’s Christian Connexion, asserted the Rev. Austin Craig before a ministerial gathering in 1850, certainly “did not purpose the formation of a new sect.” Never- theless, he admitted, “moral affinities presently consociated them,” while misunderstanding and opposition from other religious groups gradually pushed them toward a more theologically and structurally defined position.(1) Some Christians [Hereafter this chapter will follow the Christian Connexion’s own most common usage: the word Christian, upper case, will refer to the Connexion itself; “christian,” lower case, will refer to the generic body of believers.] had begun to call their movement a denomination as early as the mid-1820s. As a whole, however, the group adamantly rejected such labels, advocating instead a broad and fun- damental christian inclusivity and eschewing all “party names.” Austin Craig’s address, deliv- ered on the eve of a historic convention at Marion, Ohio, effectively united the three distinct re- gional movements that “carried the name of Christ only,” and was thus especially notable for its attempt to summarize the several “principles” generally held among them. Resolutely biblical, privatistic, antidogmatic, and revivalistic, most of the Christians - especially in New England - had steadfastly resisted attempts to systematize or codify what they believed or how they ordered themselves. On both pragmatic and theological grounds they insisted on a believer’s right to pri- vate judgment and on the concomitant necessity for tolerance and cooperation among believers whose private judgments might differ.
[Show full text]