Survival and First-Year Growth of Water Tupelo (Nyssa Aquatica L.) in Relation to Flooding and Siltation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Survival and First-Year Growth of Water Tupelo (Nyssa Aquatica L.) in Relation to Flooding and Siltation Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1969 Survival and First-Year Growth of Water Tupelo (Nyssa Aquatica L.) in Relation to Flooding and Siltation. Harvey Ellis Kennedy Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Kennedy, Harvey Ellis Jr, "Survival and First-Year Growth of Water Tupelo (Nyssa Aquatica L.) in Relation to Flooding and Siltation." (1969). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1668. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1668 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 70-9068 KENNEDY, Jr., Harvey Ellis, 1933- SURVIVAL AND FIRST-YEAR GROWTH OF WATER TUPELO (Nvssa aguatica L.) IN RELATION TO FLOODING AND SILTATION. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1969 Agriculture, forestry and wildlife University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan SURVIVAL AND FIRST-YEAR GROWTH OF WATER TUPELO (Nysaa aguatica L.) IN RELATION TO FLOODING AND SILTATION A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Forestry and Wildlife Management by Harvey Ellis Kennedy, Jr. B.S., Louisiana State University, 1963 M.F., Louisiana State University, 1964 August, 1969 PLEASE NOTE: Several pages contain colored illustrations. Filmed in the best possible way. UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is indebted to the U.S . Forest Service , Southern Forest Experiment Station, and Southern Hardwoods Laboratory for permission to use this study for a dissertation. Acknowledgment is made to Mr. J. S. "Sid" McKnight, Project Leader for Timber Management Research at the Southern Hardwoods Laboratory, for his advice and encouragement during the study. The author is also indebted to Dr. N. E. Linnartz for his advice and help in the completion of this study and the prepara­ tion of this dissertation; and to Drs. W. H. Patrick, Jr., P. Y. Bums, T. Hansbrough, and B. A. Bateman for their critical review of the manuscript. Special thanks are extended to Mr. R. L. Johnson for his advice and suggestions during the study; to Mr. R. M. Krinard for his statistical advice and writing the computer programs used; and to Mr. W. D. Boykin for his assistance in the field and laboratory work. Special acknowledgment is made to the author's wife for her typing of this manuscript and for her understanding and encourage­ ment, without which the study may never have been completed. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS................... ..................... iii LIST OF TABLES........ ,.................................. v LIST OF FIGURES *....... viii LIST OF PLATES............................................ ix ABSTRACT........ x INTRODUCTION.............................................. 1 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE................... 3 Flooding Studies with Water Tupelo and Various Other Hardwoods•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 Flooding Studies with Species Exclusive of Water Tupelo. .... ••••• 10 Effects of Flooding on Various Soil Properties......• 15 Summary. .... ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 20 METHODS AND PROCEDURES.................................... 22 Physical Layout•••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••.....•••• 22 Plot Selection and Treatments ..... 24 Planting and Flooding•••••••••••••••••.......•••••••• 28 Measurements ..... 30 Chemical Analyses •••••... 31 Statistical A n a l y s e s 33 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.................................... 36 Effects of Flooding and Siltation on Growth and Survival•••••.........••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 36 Total heights and root-collar diameters36 Survival. • ........... ..••••••. 56 Dieback. 58 iii Page Effects of Flooding on Some Soil Properties and Nutrient Uptake by S e e d l i n g s 60 Oxidation-reduction potentials........ 63 Ammonium accumulations ........ 65 Nitrate reduction.•••••• ..... 65 Bxtractable phosphorus•••••••••••••••••••••.••••••• 67 Potassium.......... 69 Calcium.•• • • • • • • • • • • • • . 6 9 . Organic matter and pH.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 72 Relationship of soil changes to growth and survival••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••• 74 Nutrient uptake•.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 75 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS................................... 78 LITERATURE CITED...................... 83 APPENDICES.............................. 88 Appendix A: Analytical Procedures for Chemical Analyses .....••••••••••••••• 88 Appendix B : Statistical Analyses•••••••••.....•••••• 101 iv LIST OF TABLES Number Page 1* Average heights, diameters, and survival of water tupelo by flooding depths and drainage date (Phase I).*..............**....*....*........ 37 2* Average heights, diameters, and survival of water tupelo by siltation depth, flooding depth, and drainage date (Phase II)••*•••••••••••••••.••• 38 3a Average heights, diameters, and survival of water tupelo by date and duration of reflooding (Phase III)................................ 39 4. Soil and water temperatures and oxygen content of water in Riase I plots*....•••••••••••••••••••• 44 5. Soil and water temperatures and oxygen content of water in Phase III plots...•••••••••••••••••••• 59 6. Nitrogen content of soil by treatment before, during, and after flooding...*.••••••••••••••••••• 66 7. Phosphorus content of soil by treatment before, during, and after flooding.• •••••••••••••••••••... 68 8. Potassium content of soil by treatment before, during, and after f l o o d i n g . •••••••••••• 70 9. Calcium content of soil by treatment before, during, and after flooding..............o*........ 71 10. Organic matter and pH of soil by treatment before, during, and after flooding.•••••••• ..... 73 11. Nutrient contents of leaves at the end of the growing season.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.. 76 12. Analysis of covariance for total heights in Phase I....................•••••••••••••••••.•• 101 13. Analysis of covariance for root-collar diameters in Phase I.•••••••••••••.102 v Number Page 14. Factorial analysis of variance of arcsin transformed survival percentages in Phase I....... 103 15. Analysis of covariance for total heights in Phase II....................................... 104 16. Analysis of covariance for root-collar diameters in Phase II.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 105 17. Factorial analysis of variance of arcsin transformed survival percentages in Phase II.••••• 106 18. Analysis of covariance for total heights in Phase I I I . 107 19. Analysis of covariance for root-collar diameters in Phase III......•••••••••••••••••••••• 108 20. Factorial analysis of variance of arcsin transformed survival percentages in Phase III..... 109 21. Analysis of variance for nitrogen content of leaves (Fhase 1)..«..................•••••••••• 110 22. Analysis of variance for phosphorus content of leaves (Phase I)............................... 110 23. Analysis of variance for potassium content of leaves (Phase I).... ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 111 24. Analysis of variance for calcium content of leaves (Phase I)............................... H I 25. Analysis of variance for calcium content of leaves (Phase II)•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 112 26. Analysis of variance for nitrogen content of leaves (Phase II)•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 112 27. Analysis of variance for potassium content of leaves (Phase II)•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 113 28. Analysis of variance for phosphorus content of leaves (Phase II)•••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••• 114 29. Analysis of variance for nitrogen content of leaves (Phase III).•••••••..••••••••••••••••••• 115 vi Number Page 30. Analysis of variance for phosphorus content of leaves (Fhase III)•••••.... •••••••••••••••••• 115 31. Analysis of variance for potassium content of leaves (Phase III).••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 116 32. Analysis of variance for calcium content of leaves (Phase III)............................ 116 vii LIST OF FIGURES Number Page 1. Diagrammatic layout of plots and irrigation system..•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 23 2. Diagrammatic layout of plots with randomly assigned treatments••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 27 3. Response of total height to depth and duration of flooding in Phase I..... ..... 4 7 4. Response of root-collar diameters to depth and duration of flooding in Phase I 48 viii LIST OF PLATES Number Page 1. Dock extending over Shell Lake with pump installed and attached to power unit.............. 25 2. Overall view of plots......••••••••••••••••••••••• 26 3. A shallow-flooded plot photographed early in the growing season............................. 41 4. A moderate-flooded plot photographed early in the growing s e a s o n . 42 5. Seedlings in a shallow-flooded plot at the end of the growing season.•••••••••••••••••••••••• 45 6. Seedlings in a moderate-flooded plot at the end of the growing season.•••••••••••••••••••••••• 46 7. Seedlings subjected to 6 to 8 inches of siltation in conjunction with moderate flooding until June l............................. 50 8. Seedlings subjected
Recommended publications
  • Recommended Trees for Winnetka
    RECOMMENDED TREES FOR WINNETKA SHADE TREES Common_Name Scientific_Name Ohio Buckeye Acer galbra Miyabe Maple Acer miyabei Black Maple Acer nigrum Norway Maple Acer plantanoides v. ___ Sugar Maple (many cultivars) Acer saccharum Shangtung Maple Acer truncatum Autumn Blaze or Marmo Maple Acer x freemanii Red Horsechestnut Aesculus x carnea 'Briotii' Horsechestnut Aesulus hippocastanum Alder Alnus glutinosa Yellowwood Caldrastis lutea Upright European Hornbeam Carpinus betulus “Fastigata” American Hornbeam Carpinus carolinians Hickory Carya ovata Catalpa Catalpa speciosa Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Katsuratree Cercidiphyllum japonicum Turkish Filbert Corylus colurna American Beech Fagus grandifolia Green Beech Fagus sylvatica European Beech Fagus sylvatica Ginkgo Ginkgo biloba Thornless Honeylocust Gleditsia triacanthos inermis Kentucky Coffeetree Gymnocladus dioica Goldenraintree Koelreuteria paniculata Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Tulip Tree Liriodendron tulipfera Black gum, Tupelo Liriodendron tulipfera Hophornbeam Ostrya virginiana Corktree Phellodendron amurense Exclamation Plantree Plantanus x aceerifolia Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor Shingle Oak Quercus imbricaria Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa Chinkapin Oak Quercus muehlenbergii English Oak Quercus robur Red Oak Quercus rubra Schumard Oak Quercus shumardii Black Oak Quercus velutina May 2015 SHADE TREES Common_Name Scientific_Name Sassafras Sassafras albidum American Linden Tilia Americana Littleleaf Linden (many cultivars) Tilia cordata Silver
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Fringe
    Beyond the Fringe By Margaret Klein Wilson, Fairfax Master Gardener Intern The final flourish of native spring flowering trees belongs to fringe trees (Chionanthus virginicus). The measured parade of seasonal color — dogwoods and redbuds, flowering cherry and plum — is neatly capped by the fluttering grace of abundant white blossoms that engulf this small, often edge habitat tree beginning in mid-May. Encountering a fringe tree on a breezy spring day is to see masses of white corollas of petals casting their light perfume across the landscape. Is it any wonder Linnaeus named Yale ©2021 Copyright and noted this genus Chionanthus (chion = University snow; anthos = flower) as he compiled the photo: Genera Plantarum (1753)? Less poetically, fringe tree’s common names include Old Man’s Beard, Grancy graybeard, flowering ash and white fringe tree. Genus Chionanthus is a member of the Olive Family, the Olaceae, which includes 29 genera and over 600 species of trees and shrubs common in southeastern Asia and Australasia. Trees in this genus have uses both practical and ornamental: olive for food, ash for its lumber, and forsythia, gardenia and privets for sheer domestic beauty. In North America, ash trees in the genus Fraxinus, devilwood (Osmantus americanus) and Forestiera (swampprivet) are fringe tree’s near relatives. Only two species of fringe tree exist: C. virginicus in eastern North America and C. retusus, native to China. In his citation naming fringe tree the Virginia Native Plant Society 1997 Wildflower of the Year, C. F. Saachi explains this geographic disconnect: “This unusual biogeographic pattern, with different species within a genus … separated by several thousand miles, is a product of major geologic events including mountain building and the effects of glaciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana's Native Magnolias
    FNR-238 Purdue University Forestry and Natural Resources Know your Trees Series Indiana’s Native Magnolias Sally S. Weeks, Dendrologist Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 This publication is available in color at http://www.ces.purdue.edu/extmedia/fnr.htm Introduction When most Midwesterners think of a magnolia, images of the grand, evergreen southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora) (Figure 1) usually come to mind. Even those familiar with magnolias tend to think of them as occurring only in the South, where a more moderate climate prevails. Seven species do indeed thrive, especially in the southern Appalachian Mountains. But how many Hoosiers know that there are two native species Figure 2. Cucumber magnolia when planted will grow well throughout Indiana. In Charles Deam’s Trees of Indiana, the author reports “it doubtless occurred in all or nearly all of the counties in southern Indiana south of a line drawn from Franklin to Knox counties.” It was mainly found as a scattered, woodland tree and considered very local. Today, it is known to occur in only three small native populations and is listed as State Endangered Figure 1. Southern magnolia by the Division of Nature Preserves within Indiana’s Department of Natural Resources. found in Indiana? Very few, I suspect. No native As the common name suggests, the immature magnolias occur further west than eastern Texas, fruits are green and resemble a cucumber so we “easterners” are uniquely blessed with the (Figure 3). Pioneers added the seeds to whisky presence of these beautiful flowering trees. to make bitters, a supposed remedy for many Indiana’s most “abundant” species, cucumber ailments.
    [Show full text]
  • Q U a R T E R L Y N E W S L E T T E R December 2009 Volume 7 Number 2 of 4
    LOUISIANA NATURAL AREAS REGISTRY Q u a r t e r l y N e w s l e t t e r December 2009 Volume 7 Number 2 of 4 Working with landowners towards conservation of Louisiana’s ecologically sensitive lands http//www.Louisiana.gov/experience/natural heritage/naturalareasregistry/ Can you name this flower? See Page 6 for answer. NATURAL AREAS UPDATE They are considered together here due to their floristic similarity Amity Bass has joined the and/or similarity in management needs.) Louisiana Natural Cypress‐Tupelo‐Blackgum Swamps throughout the natural range are Heritage Program staff as forested alluvial swamps growing on intermittently exposed soils our new Community most commonly along rivers and streams but also occurring in back Ecologist. She is a native swamp depressions and swales. The soils are inundated or saturated of West Monroe in by surface water or ground water on a nearly permanent basis northeast Louisiana. throughout the growing season except during periods of extreme Amity received her drought. However, even deepwater swamps, with almost Bachelors in Biology from continuous flooding, experience seasonal fluctuations in water levels the University of (LNHP 1986‐2004). Baldcypress swamps generally occur on mucks Louisiana at Monroe and clays, and also silts and sands with underlying clay layers (ULM) in 2005 and her (Alfisols, Entisols, Histosols, and Inceptisols) (Conner and Buford undergraduate work 1998). focused on the nesting ecology of turtles on sandbars and Cypress‐Tupelo‐Blackgum swamps have relatively low floristic herpetofaunal (study of reptiles and amphibians) surveys on state diversity. Taxodium distichum (baldcypress) and Nyssa aquatica wildlife management areas.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Magnoliaceae Liriodendron L. Magnolia L
    THE Magnoliaceae Liriodendron L. Magnolia L. VEGETATIVE KEY TO SPECIES IN CULTIVATION Jan De Langhe (1 October 2014 - 28 May 2015) Vegetative identification key. Introduction: This key is based on vegetative characteristics, and therefore also of use when flowers and fruits are absent. - Use a 10× hand lens to evaluate stipular scars, buds and pubescence in general. - Look at the entire plant. Young specimens, shade, and strong shoots give an atypical view. - Beware of hybridisation, especially with plants raised from seed other than wild origin. Taxa treated in this key: see page 10. Questionable/frequently misapplied names: see page 10. Names referred to synonymy: see page 11. References: - JDL herbarium - living specimens, in various arboreta, botanic gardens and collections - literature: De Meyere, D. - (2001) - Enkele notities omtrent Liriodendron tulipifera, L. chinense en hun hybriden in BDB, p.23-40. Hunt, D. - (1998) - Magnolias and their allies, 304p. Bean, W.J. - (1981) - Magnolia in Trees and Shrubs hardy in the British Isles VOL.2, p.641-675. - or online edition Clarke, D.L. - (1988) - Magnolia in Trees and Shrubs hardy in the British Isles supplement, p.318-332. Grimshaw, J. & Bayton, R. - (2009) - Magnolia in New Trees, p.473-506. RHS - (2014) - Magnolia in The Hillier Manual of Trees & Shrubs, p.206-215. Liu, Y.-H., Zeng, Q.-W., Zhou, R.-Z. & Xing, F.-W. - (2004) - Magnolias of China, 391p. Krüssmann, G. - (1977) - Magnolia in Handbuch der Laubgehölze, VOL.3, p.275-288. Meyer, F.G. - (1977) - Magnoliaceae in Flora of North America, VOL.3: online edition Rehder, A. - (1940) - Magnoliaceae in Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs hardy in North America, p.246-253.
    [Show full text]
  • Nyssa Aquatica, Water Tupelo1 Michael G
    FOR 262 Nyssa aquatica, Water Tupelo1 Michael G. Andreu, Melissa H. Friedman, Mary McKenzie, and Heather V. Quintana2 Family entire or smooth margins that sometimes have serrations (teeth). The thick leaves are shiny dark green on the topside Cornaceae, dogwood family. and paler and pubescent on the underside. The trunk is buttressed at the base and its bark is dark brown or dark Genus gray and splits into finely scaled ridges. In the spring, green Nyssa was the name of an ancient Greek mythological water flowers appear in clusters on long stalks. Male and female goddess. flowers appear on separate trees. The male flowers are about ¼ inch long and appear in clusters, while the female flowers Species are about ¾ inch long and are solitary. Oblong shaped drupes (fleshy fruits that usually contain one seed) about ½ The species name, aquatica, stems from Latin and means inch to 1½ inches long ripen in early fall and are dark blue “of water.” to dark purple. Common Name Water Tupelo, Cotton Gum The word “tupelo” is said to have stemmed from the language of the Creek tribe and means “swamp tree.” The other common name, “cotton gum,” is thought to come from the cottony feeling one gets in one’s mouth after eating the bitter fruits. Description This native deciduous tree is found in the bottomlands, floodplains, and swamps of southern Virginia, south to northwest Florida, west to southeastern Texas, and north Figure 1. Leaves and fruit of Nyssa aquatica. through the Mississippi River Valley. Mature trees grow Credits: SJQuinney, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 best in full sunlight and can reach heights of approximately 100 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • De Novo Genome Assembly of Camptotheca Acuminata, a Natural Source of the Anti-Cancer Compound Camptothecin Dongyan Zhao1, John
    Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript Camptotheca_Ms_v15_GigaSci.docx 1 2 3 4 1 De novo genome assembly of Camptotheca acuminata, a natural source of the anti-cancer 5 6 7 2 compound camptothecin 8 9 10 3 Dongyan Zhao1, John P. Hamilton1, Gina M. Pham1, Emily Crisovan1, Krystle Wiegert-Rininger1, 11 12 13 4 Brieanne Vaillancourt1, Dean DellaPenna2, and C. Robin Buell1* 14 15 16 5 1Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA 17 18 19 20 6 2Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 21 22 23 7 48824 USA 24 25 26 8 Email addresses: Dongyan Zhao <[email protected]>, John P. Hamilton <[email protected]>, 27 28 29 9 Gina M. Pham <[email protected]>, Emily Crisovan <[email protected]>, Krystle Wiegert- 30 31 10 Rininger <[email protected]>, Brieanne Vaillancourt <[email protected]>, Dean Dellapenna 32 33 34 11 <[email protected]>, C Robin Buell <[email protected]> 35 36 37 12 *Correspondence should be addressed to: C. Robin Buell, [email protected] 38 39 40 41 13 42 43 44 14 Manuscript type: Data note 45 46 47 48 15 49 50 51 16 Note: Reviewers can access the genome sequence and annotation using the following 52 53 54 17 temporary URL: http://datadryad.org/review?doi=doi:10.5061/dryad.nc8qr. 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 1 64 65 1 2 3 4 18 Abstract 5 6 7 8 19 Background: Camptotheca acuminata is one of a limited number of species that produce 9 10 20 camptothecin, a pentacyclic quinoline alkaloid with anti-cancer activity due to its ability to 11 12 13 21 inhibit DNA topoisomerase.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeomorphic Characterization of Floodplain Forest Change in Response to Reduced Flows Along the Apalachicola River, Florida
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS River. Res. Applic. (2009) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/rra.1251 BIOGEOMORPHIC CHARACTERIZATION OF FLOODPLAIN FOREST CHANGE IN RESPONSE TO REDUCED FLOWS ALONG THE APALACHICOLA RIVER, FLORIDA J. ANTHONY STALLINS,a* MICHAEL NESIUS,b MATT SMITH b and KELLY WATSON b a Department of Geography, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32308, USA b Graduate Program in Geography, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32308, USA ABSTRACT The Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint (ACF) River basin is an important ecological and economic component of a three-state region (Florida, Alabama and Georgia) in the southeastern U.S. Along the Apalachicola River in northwest Florida, the duration of floodplain inundation has decreased as a result of declining river levels. Spring and summer flows have diminished in volume because of water use, storage and evaporation in reservoirs, and other anthropogenic and climatic changes in the basin upstream. Channel erosion from dam construction and navigation improvements also caused river levels to decline in an earlier period. In this paper, we document trends in floodplain forest tree species composition for the interval spanning these influences. Historic tree inventories from the 1970s were compared to present-day forests through non-metric multidimensional scaling, indicator species analysis (ISA) and outlier detection. Forests are compositionally drier today than in the 1970s. Overstory to understory compositional differences within habitats (levees, high/low bottomland forest and backswamps) are as large as the species contrasts between habitats. Present-day forests are also compositionally noisier with fewer indicator species. The largest individual declines in species density and dominance were in backswamps, particularly for Fraxinus caroliniana Nyssa ogeche and Nyssa aquatica.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomic Approach
    Toward the ultimate phylogeny of Magnoliaceae: phylogenomic approach Sangtae Kim*1, Suhyeon Park1, and Jongsun Park2 1 Sungshin University, Korea 2 InfoBoss Co., Korea Mr. Carl Ferris Miller Founder of Chollipo Arboretum in Korea Chollipo Arboretum Famous for its magnolia collection 2020. Annual Meeting of Magnolia Society International Cholliop Arboretum in Korea. April 13th~22th, 2020 http://WWW.Chollipo.org Sungshin University, Seoul, Korea Dr. Hans Nooteboom Dr. Liu Yu-Hu Twenty-one years ago... in 1998 The 1st International Symposium on the Family Magnoliaceae, Gwangzhow Dr. Hiroshi Azuma Mr. Richard Figlar Dr. Hans Nooteboom Dr. Qing-wen Zeng Dr. Weibang Sun Handsome young boy Dr. Yong-kang Sima Dr. Yu-wu Law Presented ITS study on Magnoliaceae - never published Ten years ago... in 2009 Presented nine cp genome region study (9.2 kbp) on Magnoliaceae – published in 2013 2015 1st International Sympodium on Neotropical Magnoliaceae Gadalajara, 2019 3rd International Sympodium and Workshop on Neotropical Magnoliaceae Asterales Dipsacales Apiales Why magnolia study is Aquifoliales Campanulids (Euasterids II) Garryales Gentianales Laminales Solanales Lamiids important in botany? Ericales Asterids (Euasterids I) Cornales Sapindales Malvales Brassicales Malvids Fagales (Eurosids II) • As a member of early-diverging Cucurbitales Rosales Fabales Zygophyllales Celestrales Fabids (Eurosid I) angiosperms, reconstruction of the Oxalidales Malpighiales Vitales Geraniales Myrtales Rosids phylogeny of Magnoliaceae will Saxifragales Caryphyllales
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Palette - Trees 50’-0”
    50’-0” 40’-0” 30’-0” 20’-0” 10’-0” Zelkova Serrata “Greenvase” Metasequoia glyptostroboides Cladrastis kentukea Chamaecyparis obtusa ‘Gracilis’ Ulmus parvifolia “Emer I” Green Vase Zelkova Dawn Redwood American Yellowwood Slender Hinoki Falsecypress Athena Classic Elm • Vase shape with upright arching branches • Narrow, conical shape • Horizontally layered, spreading form • Narrow conical shape • Broadly rounded, pendulous branches • Green foliage • Medium green, deciduous conifer foliage • Dark green foliage • Evergreen, light green foliage • Medium green, toothed leaves • Orange Fall foliage • Rusty orange Fall foliage • Orange to red Fall foliage • Evergreen, no Fall foliage change • Yellowish fall foliage Plant Palette - Trees 50’-0” 40’-0” 30’-0” 20’-0” 10’-0” Quercus coccinea Acer freemanii Cercidiphyllum japonicum Taxodium distichum Thuja plicata Scarlet Oak Autumn Blaze Maple Katsura Tree Bald Cyprus Western Red Cedar • Pyramidal, horizontal branches • Upright, broad oval shape • Pyramidal shape • Pyramidal shape, develops large flares at base • Pyramidal, buttressed base with lower branches • Long glossy green leaves • Medium green fall foliage • Bluish-green, heart-shaped foliage • Leaves are needle-like, green • Leaves green and scale-like • Scarlet red Fall foliage • Brilliant orange-red, long lasting Fall foliage • Soft apricot Fall foliage • Rich brown Fall foliage • Sharp-pointed cone scales Plant Palette - Trees 50’-0” 40’-0” 30’-0” 20’-0” 10’-0” Thuja plicata “Fastigiata” Sequoia sempervirens Davidia involucrata Hogan
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plants of Louisiana
    Rare Plants of Louisiana Agalinis filicaulis - purple false-foxglove Figwort Family (Scrophulariaceae) Rarity Rank: S2/G3G4 Range: AL, FL, LA, MS Recognition: Photo by John Hays • Short annual, 10 to 50 cm tall, with stems finely wiry, spindly • Stems simple to few-branched • Leaves opposite, scale-like, about 1mm long, barely perceptible to the unaided eye • Flowers few in number, mostly born singly or in pairs from the highest node of a branchlet • Pedicels filiform, 5 to 10 mm long, subtending bracts minute • Calyx 2 mm long, lobes short-deltoid, with broad shallow sinuses between lobes • Corolla lavender-pink, without lines or spots within, 10 to 13 mm long, exterior glabrous • Capsule globe-like, nearly half exerted from calyx Flowering Time: September to November Light Requirement: Full sun to partial shade Wetland Indicator Status: FAC – similar likelihood of occurring in both wetlands and non-wetlands Habitat: Wet longleaf pine flatwoods savannahs and hillside seepage bogs. Threats: • Conversion of habitat to pine plantations (bedding, dense tree spacing, etc.) • Residential and commercial development • Fire exclusion, allowing invasion of habitat by woody species • Hydrologic alteration directly (e.g. ditching) and indirectly (fire suppression allowing higher tree density and more large-diameter trees) Beneficial Management Practices: • Thinning (during very dry periods), targeting off-site species such as loblolly and slash pines for removal • Prescribed burning, establishing a regime consisting of mostly growing season (May-June) burns Rare Plants of Louisiana LA River Basins: Pearl, Pontchartrain, Mermentau, Calcasieu, Sabine Side view of flower. Photo by John Hays References: Godfrey, R. K. and J. W. Wooten.
    [Show full text]