2019 LA84 Foundation Cross-Country Coaches Clinic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2019 LA84 Foundation Cross-Country Coaches Clinic 2019 LA84 Foundation Cross-Country Coaches Clinic: Presentation II • Endurance Training Program Design: An Evidence- Based, Physiological Perspective on “Why We Do What We Do” © Jeff Messer 2019 2019 LA84 Foundation Cross-Country Coaches Clinic: Presentation II • Endurance Training Program Design: An Dr. Jeffrey I. Messer Evidence-Based, Physiological Chair, Exercise Science Department, Perspective on “Why & Faculty, Exercise Physiology, Mesa We Do What We Do” Community College, Mesa, AZ. Volunteer Assistant Coach, Boy’s Cross-Country, Desert Vista High School, Phoenix, AZ. [email protected] (480) 461 – 7378 © Jeff Messer 2019 Presentation Overview • Part I: Speaker Background • Part II: What This Presentation Is Not • Part III: Training Program Philosophy • Part IV: Training – Art & Science © Jeff Messer 2019 Presentation Overview • Part V: Maximal Aerobic Power (VO2-MAX) • Part VI: Lactate Threshold (LT) • Part VII: Running Economy (RE) • Part VIII: The Long Run (LR) © Jeff Messer 2019 Presentation Overview • Part IX: Protein Requirements & Protein Distribution in Endurance Athletes • Part X: Mitochondrial Quality versus Mitochondrial Quantity • Part XI: Acknowledgments • Part XII: Questions & Discussion © Jeff Messer 2019 Presentation Overview • Part XIII: Appendices © Jeff Messer 2019 Part I Speaker Background © Jeff Messer 2019 Speaker Background • Education – Ph.D. in exercise physiology w/ concentration in exercise biochemistry (Arizona State University, 2004) – M.S. Exercise Science (Arizona State University, 1995) – M.B.A. (Duke University, 1992) – B.A. Economics (Wesleyan University, 1984) • Experience – Darien High School (2.0 Years), Desert Vista High School (2.5 Years), Queen Creek High School (1.5 Years), Xavier College Preparatory (6.5 Years), & Desert Vista High School (2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016 / 2017 / 2018 / 2019) © Jeff Messer 2019 Speaker Background • Coaching Influences – Chris Hanson / Ellie Hardt / Dave Van Sickle – Dan Beeks, Michael Bucci, Renato Canova, Dana Castoro, Robert Chapman, Steve Chavez, Liam Clemons, Bob Davis, Erin Dawson, Marty Dugard, Jason Dunn, John Hayes, Brad Hudson, Jay Johnson, Tana Jones, Arthur Lydiard, Steve Magness, Joe Newton, Dan Noble, Jim O’ Brien, Tim O’Rourke, Rene Paragas, Haley Paul, Louie Quintana, Ken Reeves Alberto Salazar, Jerry Schumacher, Brian Shapiro, Scott Simmons, Mando Siquieros, Renee Smith-Williams, Doug Soles, Danna Swenson, Bill Vice, Joe Vigil, Mark Wetmore, & Chuck Woolridge © Jeff Messer 2019 Speaker Background • Tara Erdmann, 2:14 / 4:54 • Desert Vista High School: 2016, 2014, & 2013 Arizona State • Kari Hardt, 2:11 / 10:26 High School Girls’ Cross- Country Team Champions • Baylee Jones 2:16 / 4:55 / 10:36 • Xavier College Preparatory: 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, • Danielle Jones, 2:09 / 4:39 / and 2007 Arizona State High 10:09 School Girls’ Cross-Country Team Champions • Haley Paul, 2:13 / 4:51 • Two (2) Foot Locker National (FLN) Championship qualifiers © Jeff Messer 2019 Speaker Background • Sarah Penney, 2:11 / 10:39 • Desert Vista High School: 2002 & 2017 Arizona State High • Mason Swenson, 2:16 / 4:59 / School Boys’ Cross-Country 10:56 Team Champions • Jessica Tonn, 2:13 / 4:50 / 10:21 • 2012 Mt. SAC Relays 4 x 1,600- • Sherod Hardt, 4:10 / 8:59 m Event – 3 teams / 12 student- athletes averaged 5:13 per split • Garrett Kelly, 4:17 / 9:18 • Four (4) time NXN team • 4 x 1,600-m Relay (20:14 / 20:52 participant across two schools / 21:37 XCP) & 4 x 800-meter Relay (8:57 XCP / 9:01 DVHS) (XCP, DVHS) and one (1) time NXN individual qualifier © Jeff Messer 2019 Part II What This Presentation Is Not © Jeff Messer 2019 “What this presentation is not” Xavier College Preparatory or Desert Vista High School Training Philosophies or Training Programs https://www.highschoolru nningcoach.com/ © Jeff Messer 2019 Part III Training Program Philosophy © Jeff Messer 2019 Program Philosophy • Emphasize Plan, Structure, & Discipline • Cumulative, Consistent Aerobic Development • Conjugate Periodization © Jeff Messer 2019 Program Philosophy • Consistent Patterns of Weekly, Phasic, Seasonal, and Annual Training • Individualization & Development • Shared Responsibility © Jeff Messer 2019 Part IV Training - Art & Science © Jeff Messer 2019 Art & Science: Energetic Demands of a 5- Kilometer Race Energy Source Comparisons for Middle Distance and Distance Events “Classic” Model Energy Source 400 800 1,500 5,000 10,000 Mar Aerobic (%) 18.5 35.0 52.5 80.0 90.0 97.5 Anaerobic (%) 81.5 65.0 47.5 20.0 10.0 2.5 “Current” Model Energy Source 400 800 1,500 5,000 10,000 Mar Aerobic (%) 43.5 60.5 77.0 94.0 97.0 99.0 Anaerobic (%) 56.5 39.5 23.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 *The “current” model was determined using the latest methodology in oxygen uptake kinetics and with a much more elite subject population than the “classic” model. © Jeff Messer 2019 Art & Science: Physiological Correlates of Endurance Performance Potential Equivalent VO2-max (80%) (80%) VO -max LT LT 2 (65%) Superior LT RE – 80% is effectively (65%) “only 78%” LT 15:32 15:45 16:30 17:30 5-K 5-K 5-K 5-K © Jeff Messer 2019 Part V Maximal Aerobic Power (VO2-max) © Jeff Messer 2019 Maximal Aerobic Power (VO2-max) • Endurance / Aerobic Training … – Improves VO2-max or, more specifically, … – Enhances cardiovascular function (maximal cardiac output) – Increases total blood volume – Enhances capillary density – Improves the detraining response – Elevates mitochondrial content © Jeff Messer 2019 Improving the Maximal Rate of O2 Delivery Convection Airway Lungs CO2 O2 Diffusion Pulmonary Circulation O2 CO2 Convection Right Left Heart CO Systemic O2 2 Circulation Diffusion CO2 O2 Muscle © JeffMito Messer 2019 Training Increases VO2-max • Typical training regimen – ~ 70% VO2-max – 30 - 40 minutes * day-1 – 4 - 5 days * week-1 – 3 - 5 months • Typical increase in VO2-max ~ 10 - 20% – Subjects who were previously sedentary • Larger % increases – Subjects with higher initial VO2-max • Smaller % increases • Essentially all of the increase due to increased maximal Q © Jeff Messer 2019 Training and VO2-max: 3 Human Studies (Gollnick et al.; Wibom et al.; and Howald et al.) • Training – Cycle ergometer – Training period, Frequency, Duration, Intensity • Gollnick et al.: 5 months, 4 d/wk, 1 hr/d, 75-90% VO2max • Wibom et al.: 6 wk, 4 d/wk, 36 min/d, 70% VO2max • Howald et al.: 6 wk, 5 d/wk, 30 min/d, 72 % VO2max • Improvements in VO2-max (i.e. Aerobic Capacity) – Gollnick: 13% (46.5 to 52.5 ml . min-1 . kg-1) – Wibom: 9.6% (44.0 to 48.2 ml . min-1 . kg-1) – Howald: 14% (43.2 to 49.4 ml . min-1 . kg-1) © Jeff Messer 2019 Adaptive Increase in VO2-max Is Dependent Upon Training Stimulus • More strenuous regimens elicit greater increases • Hickson et al. (J. Appl. Physiol. 42: 372-376, 1977) – Protocol (8 healthy subj, age 20-42, 6 d/wk exercise, 10 wk): • 3 d/wk: Interval cycling 6 x 5’ @ 100% VO2max: 2’ @ 50% • 3 d/wk: Run steady rate as far as possible in 40’ – Results: • Mean increase in VO2max = 44% ! (from 38.2 to 55.0 ml/kg/min) • Increased VO2max correlated with improved endurance • One subject continued to train an additional 3 wks - total increase was 77% (22.8 to 41.0 ml/kg/min) © Jeff Messer 2019 . Training Increases Ventricular Size and Qmax (Adapted from: Rerych, S.M. et al. Am. J. Cardiol. 45: 244-252, 1980) Heart EDV SV Ejection Cardiac Total Blood Rate Fraction Output Volume (b/min) (ml) (ml) (%) (l/min) (liters) Before 74 133 95 73 6.9 8.7 Rest After 61* 167* 112* 67 6.7 11.4* Before 185 166 144 87 26.6 8.0 Maximal Exercise After 181 204* 176* 86 32.0* 10.8* 18 college swim athletes studied before and after 6 mo. intensive training Mean age = 19 yrs; 6 females, 12 males © Jeff Messer 2019 Aerobic High-Intensity Intervals • Helgerud, J., Hoydal, K., Wang, E., Karlsen, T., Berg, P., Bjerkaas, M., Simonsen, T., Helgesen, C., Hjorth, N., Bach, R., & Hoff, J. (2007). Aerobic High Intensity Intervals Improve VO2-MAX more than Moderate Training, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 39(4), 665-671 © Jeff Messer 2019 Helgerud et al. (2007) • Long, slow distance running (LSD) – Continuous run @ 70% of HRMAX (137 bpm) for 45-minutes • Lactate threshold running (LT) – Continuous run @ 85% of HRMAX (171 bpm) for 24.25-minutes © Jeff Messer 2019 Helgerud et al. (2007) • 15 / 15 interval running (15 / 15) – 47 repetitions of 15-second interval runs @ 90 - 95% of HRMAX (180 - 190 bpm) interspersed w/ 15-second active recovery periods @ 70% of HRMAX (140 bpm) • 4 x 4 interval running (4 x 4) – 4 x 4-minute interval runs @ 90 - 95% of HRMAX (180 - 190 bpm) interspersed w/ 3-minute active recovery periods @ 70% of HRMAX (140 bpm) © Jeff Messer 2019 Helgerud et al. (2007) Which training intervention is relatively more effective in eliciting improvement(s) in maximal aerobic capacity, stroke volume, running economy, and / or lactate threshold? © Jeff Messer 2019 Helgerud et al. (2007) 20.0% 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% ∆ VO2-max (%) 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% LSD LT 15/15 4 X 4 Training Intervention © Jeff Messer 2019 Helgerud et al. (2007) 20.0% 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% ∆SV (%) 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% LSD LT 15/15 4 X 4 Training Intervention © Jeff Messer 2019 Helgerud et al. (2007) Potential Interpretation: Long, slow distance training and / or threshold training may not be particularly effective in improving maximal aerobic capacity in already well- conditioned individuals © Jeff Messer 2019 Helgerud et al. (2007) • Physiological Correlate – VO2MAX = QMAX * (a-v)O2DIFF (Fick Principle) – QMAX = HRMAX * SVMAX – Endurance Training (ET) does not Increase HRMAX – Thus, one Focus of ET should be Enhancement of SVMAX © Jeff Messer 2019 Helgerud et al.
Recommended publications
  • Exercise Intensity During Olympic-Distance Triathlon in Well-Trained Age-Group Athletes: an Observational Study
    sports Article Exercise Intensity during Olympic-Distance Triathlon in Well-Trained Age-Group Athletes: An Observational Study Atsushi Aoyagi 1 , Keisuke Ishikura 2 and Yoshiharu Nabekura 3,* 1 Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8574, Japan; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Management, Josai University, 1-1 Keyakidai, Sakado, Saitama 350-0295, Japan; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8574, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine the exercise intensity during the swimming, cy- cling, and running legs of nondraft legal, Olympic-distance triathlons in well-trained, age-group triathletes. Seventeen male triathletes completed incremental swimming, cycling, and running tests to exhaustion. Heart rate (HR) and workload corresponding to aerobic and anaerobic thresholds, maximal workloads, and maximal HR (HRmax) in each exercise mode were analyzed. HR and workload were monitored throughout the race. The intensity distributions in three HR zones for each discipline and five workload zones in cycling and running were quantified. The subjects were then assigned to a fast or slow group based on the total race time (range, 2 h 07 min–2 h 41 min). The mean percentages of HRmax in the swimming, cycling, and running legs were 89.8% ± 3.7%, 91.1% ± 4.4%, and 90.7% ± 5.1%, respectively, for all participants. The mean percentage of HRmax and intensity distributions during the swimming and cycling legs were similar between groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Athletes and Distance Training Physiological and Biomechanical Rationale for Change
    Sports Med 2007; 37 (1): 47-57 REVIEW ARTICLE 0112-1642/07/0001-0047/$44.95/0 2007 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved. Power Athletes and Distance Training Physiological and Biomechanical Rationale for Change Marcus C.C.W. Elliott,1 Phillip P. Wagner1 and Loren Chiu2 1 Peak Performance Project, Santa Barbara, California, USA 2 Department of Biokinesiology, University of Southern California, Santa Barbara, California, USA Contents Abstract .....................................................................................47 1. Current Practices of Distance Training .......................................................48 2. Performance Decrements from Distance Training ............................................49 2.1 Neuromuscular Considerations .........................................................50 2.2 Endocrine Considerations ..............................................................51 2.3 Overtraining ..........................................................................51 3. The Benefits of Aerobic Training for Anaerobic Athletes .......................................52 3.1 Improved Recovery ...................................................................52 3.2 Enhanced Glucose Uptake ............................................................53 3.3 Improved Body Composition ...........................................................53 3.4 Active Recovery Day ..................................................................54 3.5 Preparation of Supporting Structures ....................................................54
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Special Warfare Physical Training Guide
    Naval Special Warfare Physical Training Guide DISCLAIMER: Preparation for this training can be equally strenuous. You should consult a physician before you begin any strenuous exer- cise program, such as the one described here, or any diet modification, especially if you have or suspect that you may have heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, or any other adverse medical conditions. If you feel faint or dizzy at any time while performing any portion of this training program, stop immediately and seek medical evaluation. The United States Government and any service member or civilian employed by the United States Government disclaims any liability, personal or professional, resulting from the misapplication of any training procedure, technique, or guidance described in this guide. he Naval Special Warfare This guide provides infor- sit-ups as they are necessary TPhysical Training Guide mation about the type of train- for success at BUD/S. Cross- is designed to assist anyone ing required to properly pre- training such as cycling, who wants to improve his fit- pare for the rigors of BUD/S, rowing and hiking is useful to ness in order to take and pass and it offers a tailorable 26- rehabilitate an injury, to add the Physical Screening Test week training plan that should variety or to supplement your (PST) and succeed at Basic help a person with average basic training. Underwater Demolition/SEAL fitness prepare for training Work to improve your (BUD/S). and avoid injury. weakest areas. If you are a Most of your cardio- solid runner but a weak swim- vascular exercise should mer, don’t spend all your time General Training Guidelines focus on running and running just because you are Your workouts should be swimming, and your good at it.
    [Show full text]
  • Intensity: How to Plan & Gauge Effective Training
    Cycling Past 50, 60 and Beyond: Training by Intensity How to Plan & Gauge the Most Beneficial Training Efforts By John Hughes, 65 years old Paris-Brest-Paris ’79, ’87, ’91, ’95, ’99; Furnace Creek 508 ’89 (Course Record), ’93 (1st); Boston-Montreal-Boston ’92 (Course Record); Reno-Tucson record ’94 (849 miles in 54:17, still standing), Oregon North- Race Across AMerica ’96; Rocky Mountain 1200 ’04 South record ’95 (292 miles in 14:23, still standing); Table of Contents Introduction Why Ride Hard? Why Does Performance Decline With Age? Benefits of Training with Intensity Benefits of Types of Intensity Ways of Gauging Exertion Rate of Perceived Exertion Heart Rate Monitor Power Meter Training Zones Using RPE, Heart Rate and Power Preventing Injury Proper Preparation Importance of Recovery Managing Training Load Athletic Maturity and Choosing Workouts Intensity Workouts Tempo Workouts Sweet Spot Workouts Sub-Lactate Threshold Workouts Super-Lactate Threshold Workouts Maximum Effort Workouts Measuring Progress Go for It! Resources About the Author Other Publications by Coach John Hughes Follow Coach Hughes https://twitter.com/HughesCoaching and https://www.facebook.com/john.hughes.5283 © Copyright 2014 by John Hughes Page 1 Introduction The median age of RBR readers at the time of our last reader survey in 2012 was 48, so it’s safe to assume that our median age is approaching if not past the watershed 50th birthday. Experts estimate that by 2025 more than 25% of the population in the United States and Canada will be age 65 or older. (Taylor, 2008) As we age—I’m in my 60s and know from experience—cardiovascular capacity, endurance, strength and power all decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic Training: Do We Really Need Cardio?
    Metabolic Training: Do We Really Need Cardio? Mike Bracko, Ed.D., CSCS, FACSM [email protected] Trainers and our clients are obsessed with “Cardio, Cardio, Cardio.” There is a perception that MICT must be part of an exercise program in order to make training complete, to burn more calories, to lose more weight, or to be completely fit. With more high intensity interval training (HIIT) research studies being done and showing reduced skin folds, total body mass, fat mass, trunk fat, and fasting plasma insulin levels it is time to ask the question: Which type of exercise is better for fat loss – continuous or interval training? What do “the guidelines” say? American College of Sports Medicine - Moderate-intensity cardio exercise for ≥30 min/day ≥5 days/week for a total of ≥150 min/week. Vigorous-intensity cardio exercise for ≥20 min/day ≥3 days/week for total of ≥75 min/week. Or a combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise. American Heart Association - 150 min/week moderate exercise or 75 min/week vigorous exercise (or combination of moderate and vigorous. 30 minutes a day, five times a week is an easy goal to remember. You will also experience benefits if you divide your time into 2 or 3 segments of 10 -15 minutes per day. American Diabetes Association - Exercise doesn't necessarily mean running a marathon or bench pressing 300 pounds. The goal is to get active and stay active . gardening to playing tennis to walking with friends. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology - To achieve health benefits, adults 18-64 yrs should get at least 150 min’s moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity/week, in bouts of 10 minutes or more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of Training Methods Between NCAA Division I Cross-Country Runners with 10,000 Meter Performance
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 4-1997 The Relationship of Training Methods Between NCAA Division I Cross-Country Runners with 10,000 Meter Performance Max J. Kurz Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Part of the Health and Physical Education Commons THE RELATIONSHIP OF TRAINING METHODS BETWEEN NCAA DIVISION I CROSS-COUNTRY RUNNERS WITH 10,000 METER PERFORMANCE A Thesis Presented to the School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science University of Nebraska at Omaha by Max J. Kurz April, 1997 UMI Number: EP73245 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP73245 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProGuesC ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 i THESIS ACCEPTANCE Acceptance for the faculty of the Graduate College, University of Nebraska, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Science, University of Nebraska at Omaha. / Committee Name Department/School L Narm Department/School Chairperson Date Acknowledgements This thesis began during the winter months when Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Long Slow Distance Exercise Regime on Health- Related Physical Fitness Components Among Overweight Adults with Non-Communicable Diseases
    International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences Vol. 7(1), pp. 9-15, January 2019 DOI: 10.30918/IRJMMS.71.18.056 ISSN: 2354-211X Full Length Research Paper Effect of long slow distance exercise regime on health- related physical fitness components among overweight adults with non-communicable diseases Mastura Johar¹*, Tan Chin Hung¹, Haizan Mohd Taha¹, Amira Raihana Adnan², Muhamad Safwan Ishak², Alicia Philip² and Mohd Nahar Azmi³ ¹College of Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia. ²College of Foundation & Diploma Studies, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia. ³Faculty Medicine, University Malaya, Malaysia. Accepted 23 November, 2018 ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a 12-weeks of long slow distance (LSD) exercise with interval training for the treatment of health related physical fitness components such as cardiovascular endurance, body fat composition, flexibility, muscle strength, muscle endurance and total fitness score among overweight adults with non-communicable disease. The intervention exercise program is a combination of long slow distance activity with interval training alternating of low and medium intensity involving a physical conditioning training with medium volume and low resistant. The study population consisted of twenty-three overweight subjects with 25 to 55 years of age and have a non-communicable disease. Subjects were assigned to a 12-weeks of intervention treatment for 60 min per once, three times in a week with total of 36 sessions. A pretest-posttest research design was used. Statistical analyses include descriptive analysis and paired t-test to determine within group mean differences. Results of the study subject of treatment group experienced a positive improvement in all the six variables after treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Intensity and Duration in Endurance Training
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233855836 Intervals, Thresholds, and Long Slow Distance: the Role of Intensity and Duration in Endurance Training Article · January 2009 CITATIONS READS 117 3,278 2 authors: Stephen Seiler Espen Tønnessen Universitetet i Agder The Norwegian Olympic Sport Center 160 PUBLICATIONS 2,861 CITATIONS 62 PUBLICATIONS 1,033 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Connecting physiological and perceptual responses during HIIT View project Training intensity, volume and recovery distribution among elite endurance athletes View project All content following this page was uploaded by Espen Tønnessen on 21 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. SPORTSCIENCE · sportsci.org Perspectives / Training Intervals, Thresholds, and Long Slow Distance: the Role of Intensity and Duration in Endurance Training Stephen Seiler1 and Espen Tønnessen2 Sportscience 13, 32-53, 2009 (sportsci.org/2009/ss.htm) 1 University of Agder, Faculty of Health and Sport, Kristiansand 4604, Norway. Email. 2 Norwegian Olympic and Paralympic Committee National Training Center, Oslo, Norway. Email. Reviewers: Iñigo Mujika, Araba Sport Clinic, Vitoria, Spain; Stephen Ingham, English Institute of Sport, Loughborough Uni- versity, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK. Endurance training involves manipulation of intensity, duration, and frequency of training sessions. The relative impact of short, high-intensity training versus longer, slower distance training has been studied and debated for decades among athletes, coaches, and scientists. Currently, the popularity pendulum has swung towards high-intensity interval training. Many fitness experts, as well as some scientists, now argue that brief, high-intensity interval work is the only form of training necessary for performance optimization.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2019 NEWSLETTER RIDE & TIE and EQUATHON
    April 2019 NEWSLETTER RIDE & TIE AND EQUATHON Bud Johns the founder of Ride & Tie has passed away. July 9th 1929- February 15th 2019 Painting by Teri Rose 1995 !1 2019 Race Schedule Apr 5-6, 2019, Giddyup and Run: WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP PREVIEW! Identify the parts of a horses hoof • Apr 6, 2019, Foxcatcher • Apr 19-20, 2019, Old Dominion No Frills • May 10-11, 2019, Tiger Turnout • May 17-18, 2019, Yellowhammer R&T **NEW DATE** • May 25-27, 2019, Outback Station • May 26, 2019, Klickitat Trek • Jun 1, 2019, Camp Fire Butte-Paradise Revival Fund Raiser • Jun 7-8, 2019, Old Dominion DID YOU KNOW? • Jun 15, 2019, Trout Lake Horses are not colored blind? • Jun 22-23, 2019, Virginia Highlands Horses don’t have a gallbladder? • Jul 13-14, 2019, WEST COAST CHAMPIONSHIP Horses teeth take up more space • Jul 27-28, 2019, Old Dominion Ride and Tie Weekend in it’s head than it’s brain? • Aug 3, 2019, Sand Canyon Male horses have 40 teeth and • Aug 16-18, 2019, 49TH ANNUAL WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP mares have 36? • Aug 31 - Sep 1, 2019, Crazy Daze Horses can see 360 degrees? • Sep 6-8, 2019, Big South Fork R&T Horses produce 10 gallons of saliva a day? • Sep 19-21, 2019, Meadow Creek Mountain Mingle You can tell if a horse is cold by • Sep 20-22, 2019, Chesapeake Fall Ride and Tie feeling behind their ears. If that area is cold, so is the horse? • Sep 28, 2019, Ride the Loup • Oct 4, 2019, Coolest Ride and Tie & Equathon • Oct 18-19, 2019, Fort Valley R&T For every anyone who participates in a R&T or Equathon you will receive this beautiful hat.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Scientific Evidence for a Polarized Cardiovascular Endurance Training Model
    BRIEF REVIEW CURRENT SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR A POLARIZED CARDIOVASCULAR ENDURANCE TRAINING MODEL JAY R. HYDREN AND BRUCE S. COHEN U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Military Performance Division, Natick, Massachusetts ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Hydren, JR and Cohen, BS. Current scientific evidence for his article discusses recent scientific evidence and a polarized cardiovascular endurance training model. J Strength current coaching practice for optimizing the period- Cond Res 29(12): 3523–3530, 2015—Recent publications T ization of cardiovascular (CV) endurance training have provided new scientific evidence for a modern aerobic exercise prescription. Several common types of endurance training models will be introduced, a short history or cardiovascular endurance exercise prescription that opti- of a novel endurance training program will be provided, and mizes the periodization cycle and maximizes potential endur- a summary of several key experiments are discussed to reveal ance performance gains in highly trained individuals. The the efficacy behind these training models. traditional threshold, high volume, and high-intensity training The traditional endurance training models have been: models have displayed limited improvement in actual race pace threshold, high volume, and high-intensity training. Thresh- in (highly) trained individuals while frequently resulting in over- old training is characterized by increasing intensity to a hard _ reaching or overtraining (physical injury and psychological pace (14–16, 6–20 RPE scale, ;55% VO2max) and holding it burnout). A review of evidence for replacing these models with for the entire workout, followed by a progressive increase in the proven polarized training model seems warranted. This the pace of the workouts in a linear periodization model.
    [Show full text]
  • Endurance Training Webinar Program Clinic Design: an Evidence­ Coaches Based
    2020 LA ‘84 Foundation: PresentationI 7/8/2020 • Endurance Training Webinar Program Clinic Design: An Evidence­ Coaches Based, PhysiologicalCountry Perspective on Cross “Why We Do What LA84We Do” From: 2020 LA ‘84 Foundation PresentationI 7/8/2020 • Endurance Training Program Design: An Dr. JeffreyWebinar I. Messer Evidence-Based, Physiological FacultyClinic - Exercise Physiology, Perspectiveon “Why Exercise Science Department, Mesa We Do WhatWe Do ” Community College, Mesa, AZ. Coaches Volunteer Assistant Coach, Boy's Country Cross-Country, Desert Vista High School, Phoenix, AZ. Cross LA84 [email protected] (480) 461 - 7378 From: Presentation Overview 7/8/2020 • Part I: Speaker Background Webinar • Part II: What This PresentationClinic Is Not • Part III: Training ProgramCoaches Philosophy Country • Part IV: Training - Art & Science Cross LA84 From: Presentation Overview 7/8/2020 • Part V: Maximal Aerobic Power (VO2-MAX) Webinar • Part VI: Lactate ThresholdClinic (LT ) Coaches • Part VII: Running Economy (RE) Country • Part VIII: TheCross Long Run (LR) LA84 From: Presentation Overview 7/8/2020 • Part IX: Protein Requirements & Protein Distribution in Endurance AthletesWebinar Clinic • Part X: Mitochondrial Quality versus Mitochondrial QuantityCoaches • Part XI: AcknowledgmentsCountry Cross • Part XII:LA84 Questions & Discussion From: Presentation Overview 7/8/2020 • Part XIII: Appendices Webinar Clinic Coaches Country Cross LA84 From: 7/8/2020 Webinar Clinic Coaches Country Cross Part LA84 I From: Speaker Background Evidence-Based
    [Show full text]
  • To Make a Triathlete
    To Make A Triathlete (Triathlon Conditioning) By: Farshad Najafipour, MD, PhD. & Farzad Najafipour, Physiotherapist. Table of Contents PREFACE ........................................................................................................ 9 AEROBIC ENDURANCE TRAINING ................................................................. 11 LONG SLOW DISTANCE TRAINING .................................................................... 12 PACE/TEMPO TRAINING .................................................................................... 12 INTERVAL TRAINING ......................................................................................... 13 REPETITION TRAINING ...................................................................................... 14 FARTLEK TRAINING ........................................................................................... 14 LACTATE THRESHOLD TRAINING .................................................................. 15 LACTATE THRESHOLD TRAINING SESSIONS ...................................................... 16 THE LACTATE THRESHOLD ........................................................................... 18 LACTATE THRESHOLD AS A PERCENTAGE OF VO 2 MAX ................................. 19 LACTATE THRESHOLD AND TRAINING .............................................................. 21 VO2 MAX, AEROBIC POWER& MAXIMAL OXYGEN UPTAKE .......................... 23 VO2 MAX IN ATHLETES AND NON ATHLETES .................................................. 24 TRAINING & VO2 MAX ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]